Could the oxygen cost of breathing be used to optimize the application of pressure support ventilation?

Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is a new ventilator modality that augments spontaneous inspiratory pressure with selected levels of positive airway pressure. There is presently considerable interest in its use in the management of critically ill, ventilator-dependent patients. The optimal method for application has not yet been established. This study investigated the effects of PSV on the oxygen cost of breathing (OCOB), a clinically applicable technique for quantitating the work of breathing. The OCOB and other bedside variables of pulmonary function were measured during PSV in ventilator-dependent patients where weaning was limited by an inability to sustain respiratory work. Nine studies were performed in 8 patients in the surgical intensive care unit. The OCOB, tidal volume (VT), respiratory rate (RR), and minute ventilation (VE) were measured at various levels of pressure support. The OCOB was calculated from the difference in oxygen consumption (VO2) during mechanical and spontaneous ventilation both at CPAP and with PSV. With increasing levels of PSV, the OCOB was observed to steadily decrease from 22% to 8% (p < 0.001). There were also statistically significant increases in VT and decreases in RR. VE appeared not to be influenced. The results of this study suggest that the bedside measurement of the OCOB may be an accurate, simple, and reproducible method of titrating the level of applied pressure support in order to optimize respiratory work.     

Comparison of proportional assist ventilation and pressure support ventilation in chronic respiratory failure due to neuromuscular and chest wall deformity

BACKGROUND: The physiological and symptomatic effects of proportional assist ventilation (PAV) and pressure support ventilation (PSV) were compared in stable awake patients with neuromuscular and chest wall deformity (NMCWD). METHODS: Oxygen saturation (SaO(2)), transcutaneous carbon dioxide (TcCO(2)), minute ventilation (VE), tidal volume (VT), respiratory rate (RR), and diaphragm electromyography (EMGdi) were measured in 15 patients during both modes. Subjective effort of breathing and synchrony with the ventilator were assessed using visual analogue scales. RESULTS: Three of 15 patients failed to trigger the ventilator in either mode and were excluded. In the 12 remaining patients there were similar improvements in SaO(2), TcCO(2), VE, VT, and RR during both modes. The mean (SD) percentage fall in EMGdi was greater during PSV (-80.5 (10.7)%) than during PAV (-41.3 (35.2)%; p= 0.01). Effort of breathing (p=0.004) and synchrony with the ventilator (p=0.004) were enhanced more with PSV than with PAV. CONCLUSION: Both PSV and PAV produced similar improvements in physiological parameters. However, greater diaphragm unloading was observed with PSV than with PAV, associated with greater symptomatic benefit. These findings suggest that tolerance to PAV may be compromised in patients with NMCWD.     

Hemodynamic effects of pressure support ventilation in cardiac surgery patients

Hemodynamic consequences of pressure support ventilation (PSV) were compared with intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) in 20 patients following aortocoronary bypass. On the morning following surgery, all patients were weaned by IMV to a rate of eight breaths per minute, tidal volume of 12 ml/kg and inspired oxygen concentration of 40 per cent. With patients awake and able to breath spontaneously, PSV was begun at 20 cm of water. In patients with static lung compliance, less than 0.06 l/cm H2O, 30 cm H2O of PSV was used. Subsequently, all patients were weaned to PSV 10 cm of water, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) at 5 cm water and extubated. Hemodynamic data including oxygen transport were obtained at each level of PSV and at IMV prior to weaning. Analysis using ANOVA showed comparable hemodynamic and oxygen transport parameters for PSV of 30 cm H2O in comparison with IMV. PSV at levels of 20 and 10 cm H2O produced statistically significant increases in heart rate, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Cardiac output was stable, and these increases were not clinically significant. In awake patients following cardiac surgery, PSV up to 30 cm H2O can be safely applied without hemodynamic embarrassment in patients with good left ventricular ejection fractions.     

Mandatory minute volume weaning in patients with pulmonary pathology

This study evaluates mandatory minute volume (MMV) weaning in patients with pulmonary pathology. When weaning criteria were fulfilled, 22 patients were randomised to MMV and 18 to a control intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) group. With IMV weaning the ventilator rate was decreased by two breaths per minute at 3-4 hourly intervals during daylight hours. In the MMV group a target of 75% of the ventilator minute volume was set. All weans were considered complete four hours after the cessation of mechanical support, and were deemed successful if no further ventilation was required. The success rate was 86% in the IMV and 89% in the MMV group. MMV weaning was rapid (4.75 + 1.5 hrs) and proved less demanding on the ICU staff by providing a safe trial of spontaneous respiration, while retaining the facility for partial ventilation.     

Newer modes of mechanical ventilatory support

Recent modes of ventilatory support aim to facilitate weaning and minimise the physiological disadvantages of intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV). Intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) allows the patient to breathe spontaneously in between ventilator breaths. Mandatory minute volume ventilation (MMV) ensures that the patient always receives a preset minute volume, made up of both spontaneous and ventilator breaths. Pressure supported (assisted) respiration is augmentation of a spontaneous breath up to a preset pressure level, and is different from 'triggering', which is a patient-initiated ventilator breath. Other modes or refinements of IPPV include high frequency ventilation, expiratory retard, differential lung ventilation, inversed ratio ventilation, 'sighs', varied inspiratory flow waveforms and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. While these techniques have useful applications in selective situations, IPPV remains the mainstay of managing respiratory failure for most patients.     

Supraglottic combined frequency jet ventilation versus subglottic monofrequent jet ventilation in patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery

We compared the efficacy of gas exchange during supraglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation via a jet ventilation laryngoscope and during monofrequent jet ventilation via the Mon-Jet catheter (Xomed, Jacksonville, FL). Twenty-three anesthetized (propofol, fentanyl, vecuronium) patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery were prospectively studied and randomly assigned to one of two groups. The patients' lungs were ventilated with combined-frequency jet ventilation (10 min, 15 and 600 breaths/min, inspiration/expiration time ratio = 1, driving pressure 750-1500 mm Hg), monofrequent (low-frequency group: 15 breaths/min; high-frequency group: 600 breaths/min) jet ventilation (20 min), and again combined-frequency jet ventilation (15 min). PaO(2), PaCO(2), and the inspiratory oxygen fraction (FIO(2)) were measured. Wilcoxon's signed rank test was applied. During monofrequent jet ventilation, PaCO(2) increased and the PaO(2)/FIO(2) decreased significantly (P < 0.05) as compared with combined-frequency jet ventilation (low-frequency group: PaCO(2) from 39.4 +/- 3.3 to 50. 8 +/- 8.0 mm Hg, PaO(2)/FIO(2) from 306 +/- 100 to 225 +/- 94 mm Hg; high-frequency group: PaCO(2) from 36.7 +/- 7.2 to 60.3 +/- 6.1 mm Hg, PaO(2)/FIO(2) from 429 +/- 87 to 190 +/- 51 mm Hg; mean +/- SD). After switching back to combined-frequency jet ventilation, PaCO(2) decreased and PaO(2)/FIO(2) increased to baseline levels. We conclude that gas exchange during microlaryngeal surgery can be more easily maintained with supraglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation than with subglottic monofrequent jet ventilation via the Mon-Jet catheter. IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates that the combination of high- and low-frequency supraglottic jet ventilation via a jet ventilation laryngoscope provides a better pulmonary gas exchange and allows more accurate airway pressure monitoring during microlaryngeal surgery than subglottic monofrequent jet ventilation via an endotracheal catheter.     

Effectiveness of pressure support ventilation for mechanical ventilatory support in patients with status asthmaticus

We compared the effects of pressure support ventilation (PSV) with those of assist control ventilation (ACV) on breathing patterns and blood gas exchange in six patients with status asthmaticus. Both PSV and ACV delivered adequate minute ventilation (PSV: 7.5 +/- 1.4 l/min/m2, ACV: 7.3 +/- 1.3 l/min/m2) to correct respiratory acidosis (pH = 7.33 +/- 0.12 during both PSV and ACV) and prevent hypoxia. Peak airway pressure during PSV was significantly lower with the same tidal volume than that during ACV (PSV: 30 +/- 10 cmH2O (2.9 +/- 1.0 kPa), ACV: 50 +/- 13 cmH2O (4.9 +/- 1.3 kPa)). The lower airway pressure during PSV was due to persistent inspiratory muscle activity. The oxygen cost of breathing estimated by oxygen consumption was equivalent in both modes. We conclude that PSV is effective in supplying tidal volumes adequate to improve hypercarbia at markedly lower airway pressures than ACV.     

The metabolic and ventilatory response to the infusion of stress hormones.

Sepsis and trauma result in increases in epinephrine, glucagon, and cortisol secretion as well as alterations in respiratory pattern that is characterized by increased minute ventilation, decreased tidal volume, and increased frequency. Six male subjects were infused for 5.5 hours with cortisol, epinephrine, and glucagon in amounts designed to simulate plasma levels seen in patients following trauma. During the initial 20 minutes of the hormone infusion, minute ventilation (VE), oxygen consumption (VO2), and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) increased above preinfusion values. VCO2 increased more than VO2 resulting in an increase in respiratory quotient (RQ) from 0.93 to 1.14. The increase in VE was due to increased tidal volume and not frequency (f). After 4.5 hours, the VE, VO2, and VCO2 were still above preinfusion levels but the RQ had decreased to 0.98 because of a decrease in VCO2. Frequency had increased from 19 +/- 4.8 breaths/min preinfusion to 22 +/- 4.7 after 4.5 hours. After 4.5 hours, VT was still above preinfusion levels while pH and PaCO2 had decreased below them. The latter was associated with an increase in serum lactate. At no time was a decrease in tidal volume observed. Therefore, the infusion of these hormones does not simulate all the alterations observed during trauma and sepsis.     

Pressure-supported ventilation for posterior fossa operation

To maintain enough gas exchange while using spontaneous respiration as a monitor of the normal brainstem function, we tried pressure-supported ventilation (PSV) with a Servo 900C ventilator (Siemens Elema AB, Sweden) on 12 otherwise healthy patients during posterior fossa operation. Ventilation mode was switched from controlled to PSV after the dura was open uneventfully in all cases but one. With a trigger level of -1 to -2 cm H2O, spontaneous respiration was triggered to start the inspiration. With supporting inspiratory pressure of 4-20 cm H2O, PaCO2 was kept at 31.7-45.9 mm Hg. The ventilatory level could be monitored breath by breath by ventilatory frequency, tidal volume, minute volume, and end-tidal CO2 concentration shown on the ventilator system. Apnea was observed in two cases during surgical manipulation around the brainstem. It was indicated immediately by the ventilator's alarm for decreased expiratory minute volume, and no sign of brainstem dysfunction was observed postoperatively. PSV was useful in maintaining adequate ventilation whereas spontaneous respiration was used as an indicator of normal brainstem function. The alarm system of the ventilator was sensitive enough to detect the surgical invasion of the brainstem at a very early stage.     

Central Haemodynamics and Oxygen Transport During CPAP With and Without Mandatory Ventilations

Ten patients, subjected 16 h earlier to open-heart surgery (aortocoronary bypass and/or aortic valve replacement), were studied during the weaning period after postoperative mechanical ventilation. Central haemodynamics and oxygen transport were assessed along with total oxygen consumption during continuous positive airway pressure with four mandatory ventilations per minute (mode CPAP+IMV) and, subsequently, during CPAP alone.
During the two modes of ventilation, airway pressure was adjusted to be equal during the spontaneous inspiratory phases. All parameters of haemodynamics, oxygenation and oxygen consumption were found to be essentially satisfactory and unchanged during both modes of ventilation. Our observations suggest that, as the parameters studied were unaltered with the change from CPAP+IMV to CPAP, the use of ventilatory support for these patients during the weaning period (in the form of four mandatory ventilations per minute) appears, in terms of central haemodynamics and oxygen transport, to be well tolerated in cases where adequate spontaneous ventilation is in doubt.     

Sigh improves gas exchange and lung volume in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing pressure support ventilation

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to assess the effect of periodic hyperinflations (sighs) during pressure support ventilation (PSV) on lung volume, gas exchange, and respiratory pattern in patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Thirteen patients undergoing PSV were enrolled. The study comprised 3 steps: baseline 1, sigh, and baseline 2, of 1 h each. During baseline 1 and baseline 2, patients underwent PSV. Sighs were administered once per minute by adding to baseline PSV a 3- to 5-s continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) period, set at a level 20% higher than the peak airway pressure of the PSV breaths or at least 35 cm H2O. Mean airway pressure was kept constant by reducing the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during the sigh period as required. At the end of each study period, arterial blood gas tensions, air flow and pressures traces, end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), compliance of respiratory system (Crs), and ventilatory parameters were recorded. RESULTS: Pao2 improved (P < 0.001) from baseline 1 (91.4 +/- 27.4 mmHg) to sigh (133 +/- 42.5 mmHg), without changes of Paco2. EELV increased (P < 0.01) from baseline 1 (1,242 +/- 507 ml) to sigh (1,377 +/- 484 ml). Crs improved (P < 0.01) from baseline 1 (40.2 +/- 12.5 ml/cm H2O) to sigh (45.1 +/- 15.3 ml/cm H2O). Tidal volume of pressure-supported breaths and the airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) decreased (P < 0.01) during the sigh period. There were no significant differences between baselines 1 and 2 for all parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of 1 sigh per minute during PSV in patients with early ARDS improved gas exchange and lung volume and decreased the respiratory drive.     

Respiratory efficacy of subglottic low-frequency, subglottic combined-frequency, and supraglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation during microlaryngeal surgery

We tested the respiratory efficacy of different jet ventilation techniques (subglottic low-frequency versus subglottic combined-frequency and subglottic combined-frequency versus supraglottic combined frequency) in patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery. The PaCO(2) and the quotient of arterial oxygen tension (PaO(2)) over FIO(2) were measured. After anesthetic induction (propofol, remifentanil, vecuronium), an endotracheal Mon-Jet catheter (Xomed, Jacksonville, FL) for subglottic jet ventilation and a laryngoscope for supraglottic jet ventilation (Carl Reiner G.m.b.H., Vienna, Austria) were inserted. In Group 1 (n = 18), subglottic low-frequency (15 breaths/min), combined-frequency (600 and 15 breaths/min), and low-frequency jet ventilation was subsequently performed (15 min each). In Group 2 (n = 19), the sequence was supraglottic, subglottic, and supraglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation. The driving pressures were initially adjusted to achieve normocapnia and were not changed during the entire study period. The FIO(2) was measured endotracheally. The Wilcoxon's signed rank test was applied. In Group 1, PaCO(2) and PaO(2)/FIO(2) improved significantly after switching from subglottic low-frequency to subglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation (PaCO(2), from 46.6 +/-8.3 to 42.1+/-8.1 mm Hg; PaO(2)/FIO(2), from 311+/-144 to 361+/-141 mm Hg; P<0.05). In Group 2, PaCO(2) increased and PaO(2)/FIO(2) decreased significantly after switching from supraglottic to subglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation (PaCO(2), from 39.4+/-7.1 to 45.9+/-7.5 mm Hg; PaO(2)/FIO(2), from 415+/-114 to 351+/-129 mm Hg; P<0.05). We conclude that subglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation is less effective than supraglottic combined-frequency ventilation, but more effective than subglottic low-frequency jet ventilation. Implications: The combination of high and low respiratory frequencies (600 and 15 breaths/min) improves pulmonary gas exchange during subglottic jet ventilation via an endotracheal catheter. However, subglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation is less effective than supraglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation via a jet ventilation laryngoscope.     

How rebreathing anaesthetic systems control PaCO2: studies with a mechanical and a mathematical model

Results from a proposed equation for rebreathing systems, (formula: see text), were compared with results from a mechanical model "lung" ventilated either with a Bain Breathing Circuit, or a circle system (Eger-Ethans type A) without soda lime. When values for carbon dioxide excretion (VCO2), dead spacetidal volume ratio (VD/VT), minute volume ventilation (VE), and fresh gas flow (VF) were varied over a wide range, the model and the equation yielded identical values of PaCO2. When VCO2 = 2.25 ml/kg, VD/VT = 0.5, and VE = 140 ml/kg, then fresh gas flows (VF) with both the equation and the model produced values of PaCO2 which were very close to those found by Bain and Spoerel in anaesthetized, artificially ventilated humans. It is concluded that the equation is an accurate mathematical representation of how rebreathing anaesthetic systems control PaCO2. It is expected that the equation will be useful in the clinical application of rebreathing anaesthetic systems, allowing the selection of minute volumes and fresh gas flows which will yield predictable PaCO2 values.     

Regional blood flow in respiratory muscles during partial ventilatory assistance in rabbits

We tested the hypothesis that even partial ventilatory assistance would reduce respiratory muscle blood flow to levels similar to those found during control mechanical ventilation (CMV). Three levels of pressure support ventilation (PSV) and 2 CMV settings were compared in 10 rabbits. PSV 0, 6, and 12 cm H2O, under continuous positive airway pressure mode, were applied, and then pressure control ventilation (PCV) values of 6 (36 breaths/min) and 12 cm H2O (18 per breaths/min) were applied to each CMV setting with a muscle relaxant. Using colored microspheres, we measured regional tissue blood flow in respiratory muscles, lower extremities, kidney, and liver. Regional tissue blood flow in the diaphragm during PSV6, PCV6, and PCV12 were less than those during PSV0. During PSV12, blood flow in the crural diaphragm was more than that during PCV12 and similar to that during PSV0. Whereas the transdiaphragmatic pressure of PSV6 was -0.8 +/- 1.6 cm H2O, that of PSV12 was -3.1 +/- 2.4 cm H2O. Inspiratory asynchrony, arising from an ineffective triggering effort, was observed in PSV12. The ventilatory settings did not affect blood flow of the lower extremities, liver, and kidney. In conclusion, ventilatory settings affected blood flow in the diaphragm. At certain PSV settings, blood flow in the diaphragm was minimal.     

Breathing pattern and workload during automatic tube compensation,pressure support and T-piece trials in weaning patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Automatic tube compensation has been designed as a new ventilatory mode to compensate for the non-linear resistance of the endotracheal tube. The study investigated the effects of automatic tube compensation compared with breathing through a T-piece or pressure support during a trial of spontaneous breathing used for weaning patients from mechanical ventilation of the lungs. METHODS: Twelve patients were studied who were ready for weaning after prolonged mechanical ventilation (10.2 +/- 8.4 days) due to acute respiratory failure. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were excluded. Thirty minutes of automatic tube compensation were compared with 30 min periods of 7 cmH2O pressure support and T-piece breathing. Breathing patterns and workload indices were measured at the end of each study period. RESULTS: During T-piece breathing, the peak inspiratory flow rate (0.65 +/- 0.20 L s(-1)) and minute ventilation (8.9 +/- 2.7L min(-1)) were lower than during either pressure support (peak inspiratory flow rate 0.81 +/- 0.25 L s(-1) minute ventilation 10.2 +/- 2.3 L min(-1), respectively) or automatic tube compensation (peak inspiratory flow rate 0.75 +/- 0.26L s(-1); minute ventilation 10.8 +/- 2.7 L min(-1)). The pressure-time product as well as patients' work of breathing were comparable during automatic tube compensation (pressure-time product 214.5 +/- 104.6 cmH2O s(-1) min(-1), patient work of breathing 1.1 +/- 0.4 J L(-1)) and T-piece breathing (pressure-time product 208.3 +/- 121.6 cmH2O s(-1) min(-1), patient work of breathing 1.1 +/- 0.4 J L(-1)), whereas pressure support resulted in a significant decrease in workload indices (pressure-time product 121.2 +/- 64.1 cmH2O s(-1) min(-1), patient work of breathing 0.7 +/- 0.4 J L(-1)). CONCLUSIONS: In weaning from mechanical lung ventilation, patients' work of breathing during spontaneous breathing trials is clearly reduced by the application of pressure support 7 cmH2O, whereas the workload during automatic tube compensation corresponded closely to the values during trials of breathing through a T-piece.     

Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation by means of Intermittent Assisted Ventilation I.A.V. Case Reports

A new ventilator is described which is capable of interposing controlled breaths synchronized with the patient's own breathing rhythm. This ventilation pattern is called "intermittent assisted ventilation" (IAV). It differs from intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) in that each ventilator cycle is triggered by the patient. IAV constitutes a new approach to the problems during the critical period of weaning from mechanical ventilation. Further, this new ventilator provides means for continuous display and recording of airway gas flow and pressures and expired minute volume (EMV) during different types of ventilation, e.g. controlled ventilation, intermittent assisted, and spontaneous ventilation.     

Augmentierte Spontanatmung

Impaired pulmonary gas exchange can result from lung parenchymal failure inducing oxygenation deficiency and fatigue of the respiratory muscles, which is characterized by hyercapnia or a combination of both mechanisms. Contractility of and coordination between the diaphragm and the thoracoabdominal respiratory muscles predominantly determine the efficiency of spontaneous breathing. Sepsis, cardiac failure, malnutrition or acute changes of the load conditions may induce fatigue of the respiratory muscles. Augmentation of spontaneous breathing is not only achieved by the application of different technical principles or devices; it also has to improve perfusion, metabolism, load conditions and contractility of the respiratory muscles. Intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) allows spontaneous breathing of the patient and augments alveolar ventilation by periodically applying positive airway pressure tidal volumes, which are generated by the respirator. Potential advantages include lower mean airway pressure (P_AW), as compared with controlled mechanical ventilation, and improved haemodynamics. Suboptimal IMV systems may impose increased work and oxygen cost of breathing, fatigue of the respiratory muscles and CO₂ retention. During pressure support ventilation (PSV), inspiratory alterations of P_AW or gas flow (trigger) are detected by the respirator, which delivers a gas flow to maintain P_AW at a fixed value (usually 5–20?cm H₂O) during inspiration. PSV may be combined with other modalities of respiratory therapy such as IMV or CPAP. Claimed advantages of PSV include decreased effort of breathing, reduced systemic and respiratory muscle consumption of oxygen, prophylaxis of diaphragmatic fatigue and an improved extubation rate after prolonged periods of mechanical ventilation. Minimum alveolar ventilation is not guaranteed during PSV; thus, close observation of the patient is mandatory to avoid serious respiratory complications. Continuous positive airway pressure breathing (CPAP) maintains P_AW above atmospheric pressure throughout the respiratory cycle, which may increase functional residual capacity and decrease the effort of breathing. CPAP has been conceptually designed for the augmentation of spontaneous breathing and requires the intact central and peripheral regulation of the respiratory system. Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) improves alveolar ventilation by intermittent release of P_AW, which is kept above atmospheric pressure by means of a high-flow CPAP system. The opening of an expiratory valve for 1–2?s induces a decreased P_AW and lung volume, which increases rapidly to pre-exhalation values after closure of the valve due to the high gas flow within the circuit (90–100?l/min). APRV may improve haemodynamics and V_A/Q distribution as compared with conventional mechnical ventilation. Biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) is characterized by the combination of spontaneous breathing and time-regulated, pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation. During the respiratory cycle the ventilator generates two alternating CPAP levels, which can be modified with regard to time and pressure. As with APRV, alveolar ventilation is maintained even if the spontaneous breathing efforts of the patient cease, which improves the safety of both modes of respiratory therapy. The contribution of spontaneous breathing to total minute ventilation may be important, since a decreased shunt and improved V_A/Q relationship have been observed in experimental non-cardiogenic lung oedema. These data give support to the concept that spontaneous breathing should be maintained and augmented in the setting of acute respiratory failure.     

Emergency ventilatory management in hemorrhagic states: elemental or detrimental?

BACKGROUND: A study was performed to demonstrate that slower respiratory rates (RRs) of positive-pressure ventilation can preserve adequate oxygenation and acid-base status in hemorrhagic states, whereas "normal" or higher RRs worsen hemodynamics. METHODS: Eight swine (ventilated with 12 mL/kg tidal volume, 0.28 Fio(2); RR of 12 breaths/min) were hemorrhaged to < 65 mm Hg systolic arterial blood pressure (SABP). RRs were then sequentially changed every 10 minutes to 6, 20, 30, and 6 breaths/min. RESULTS: With RRs at 6 breaths/min, the animals maintained pH > 7.25/Sao(2) > 99%, but increased mean SABP (from 65 to 84 mm Hg; p < 0.05), time-averaged coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) (from 50 +/- 2 to 60 +/- 4 mm Hg; p < 0.05), and cardiac output (Qt) (from 2.4 to 2.8 L/min; p < 0.05). With RRs of 20 and 30 breaths/min, SABP (73 and 66 mm Hg), CPP (47 +/- 3 and 42 +/- 4 mm Hg), and Qt (2.5 and 2.4 L/min) decreased, as did Pao(2) and Paco(2) (< 30 mm Hg), with p < 0.05 for each comparison, respectively. When RR returned to 6 breaths/min, SABP (95 mm Hg), CPP (71 +/- 6 mm Hg), and Qt (3.0 L/min) improved significantly (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: After even moderate levels of hemorrhage in animals, positive-pressure ventilation with "normal" or higher RRs can impair hemodynamics. Hemodynamics can be improved with lower RRs while still maintaining adequate oxygenation and ventilation.     

Sigh Improves Gas Exchange and Lung Volume in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Undergoing Pressure Support Ventilation

Background: The aim of our study was to assess the effect of periodic hyperinflations (sighs) during pressure support ventilation (PSV) on lung volume, gas exchange, and respiratory pattern in patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Methods: Thirteen patients undergoing PSV were enrolled. The study comprised 3 steps: baseline 1, sigh, and baseline 2, of 1 h each. During baseline 1 and baseline 2, patients underwent PSV. Sighs were administered once per minute by adding to baseline PSV a 3- to 5-s continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) period, set at a level 20% higher than the peak airway pressure of the PSV breaths or at least 35 cm H2O. Mean airway pressure was kept constant by reducing the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during the sigh period as required. At the end of each study period, arterial blood gas tensions, air flow and pressures traces, end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), compliance of respiratory system (Crs), and ventilatory parameters were recorded.

Results: Pao2 improved (P < 0.001) from baseline 1 (91.4 +/- 27.4 mmHg) to sigh (133 +/- 42.5 mmHg), without changes of Paco2. EELV increased (P < 0.01) from baseline 1 (1,242 +/- 507 ml) to sigh (1,377 +/- 484 ml). Crs improved (P < 0.01) from baseline 1 (40.2 +/- 12.5 ml/cm H2O) to sigh (45.1 +/- 15.3 ml/cm H2O). Tidal volume of pressure-supported breaths and the airway occlusion pressure (P0.1) decreased (P < 0.01) during the sigh period. There were no significant differences between baselines 1 and 2 for all parameters.     

Adult respiratory distress syndrome: improved oxygenation during high-frequency jet ventilation/continuous positive airway pressure

The role of high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV)/continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and HFJV/intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) in the treatment of surgical patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome were evaluated. To compare the efficacy of HFJV to IMV at a constant FiO2 and positive end-expiratory pressure, patients in surgical intensive care were randomized to receive IMV/CPAP therapy or one of three modes of HFJV: (1) HFJV/CPAP alone, (2) HFJV/CPAP + IMV (1), or (3) HFJV/CPAP + IMV (2). Each patient served as his own control. During comparison of HFJV/CPAP + IMV (1) to HFJV/CPAP + IMV (2) (n = 9) and HFJV/CPAP to HFJV/CPAP + IMV (1) (n = 7), cardiac output, PaCO2, PaO2, PvO2, and variables consisting of intrapulmonary shunt fraction (Qsp/Qt), PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and A-a gradient were calculated. The subgroup placed on HFJV/CPAP demonstrated a fall in PaO2 of 13 torr (p = NS; n = 5). HFJV/CPAP + IMV (1) compared with HFJV/CPAP significantly (p less than 0.005) increased PaO2 by 52 +/- 24 torr and decreased Qsp/Qt by 8.9 +/- 1.0 (p less than 0.025). Cardiac output remained unchanged. Comparison of HFJV/CPAP + IMV (2) to HFJV/CPAP + IMV (1) demonstrated a significant improvement in oxygenation (p less than 0.025), but of lesser magnitude (8.4 +/- 11 torr). PaO2/FiO2 ratio and A-a gradient improved in both IMV (1) and IMV (2) subgroups. Oxygenation and ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) matching significantly improved with HFJV/CPAP + IMV (1), to a greater magnitude than with HFJV/CPAP + IMV (2) or HFJV/CPAP alone, and was the preferred method of ventilatory support.