Consolidative Radiotherapy After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Introduction

We evaluated the role of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Durable Survival Outcomes in Primary and Secondary Central Nervous System Lymphoma After High-dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Using a Thiotepa,Busulfan, and Cyclophosphamide Conditioning Regimen

BackgroundHigh-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been investigated in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with CNS involvement and has shown promising results.Patients and MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed of 48 consecutive patients who had undergone HDC/ASCT with TBC (thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide) conditioning for PCNSL (27 patients), secondary CNS lymphoma (SCNSL) (8 patients), or relapsed disease with CNS involvement (13 patients) from July 2006 to December 2017. Of the 27 patients with PCNSL, 21 had undergone ASCT at first complete remission (CR1).ResultsThe 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 80.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.9-92.9) and the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 80.1% (95% CI, 69.2%-92.7%) among all patients. The 2-year PFS and OS rate for patients with PCNSL in CR1 was 95.2% (95% CI, 86.6%-100%) and 95.2% (95% CI, 86.6%-100%), respectively. On univariate analysis of the patients with PCNSL, ASCT in CR1 was the only variable statistically significant for outcome (P = .007 for PFS; P = .008 for OS). Among patients with SCNSL or CNS relapse, the 2-year PFS and OS rate were comparable at 75.9% (95% CI, 59.5%-96.8%) and 75.3% (95% CI, 58.6%-98.6%), respectively. The most common side effects were febrile neutropenia (89.6%; of which 66.7% had an infectious etiology identified), nausea/vomiting (85.4%), diarrhea (93.8%), mucositis (89.6%), and electrolyte abnormalities (89.6%). Four patients (8.3%) died of treatment-related overwhelming infection; of these patients, 3 had SCNSL.ConclusionHDC and ASCT using TBC conditioning for both PCNSL and secondary CNS NHL appears to have encouraging long-term efficacy with manageable side effects.     

Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation as a Consolidative Strategy for the Treatment of Primary and Isolated Secondary Central Nervous System Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphomas

IntroductionStandard consolidation for primary diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the central nervous system (CNS) (PCNSL) is not established. This single center, retrospective observational study aims to define the outcomes of consolidative high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/ASCT) in patients with PCNSL and isolated secondary CNS DLBCL (SCNSL) and evaluate the prognostic factors.Patients and MethodsAll consecutive patients performed an HDC/ASCT for PCNSL or isolated SCNSLs between October 2012 and February 2022 were identified. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsAmong 35 patients included, 28 had PCNSL and 7 had isolated SCNSL. Median age was 51 (16-78). Males constituted 48.6%. Median follow-up after HDC/ASCT was 42.0 months. MATRIX (51.4%) and TEAM (80.0%) were the most frequent regimens of induction and conditioning, respectively. OS and PFS 1- and 2-year after HDC/ASCT were 68.0%, 57.0%, 58.0%, 48.0%, respectively. Increasing age, poor performance and comorbidities were associated with lower OS and PFS and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM). Complete response (CR) 1 at HDC/ACST was independently associated with higher OS and PFS [hazard ratio (HR): 4.67 and 6.99, respectively].ConclusionIn patients < 60 years consolidative HDC/ASCT yields promising OS and PFS. Patients ≥ 60 years may less likely benefit from consolidative HDC/ASCT and should be studied further in trials of novel agents, lower doses of consolidative radiotherapy and dose-adjusted conditioning regimens. Not only age, but also comorbidities, clinical performance and response to induction correlate with outcomes. Patients with isolated SCNSL may achieve similar outcomes.     

Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio at Relapse Predicts Outcome for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in the Rituximab Era

BackgroundPatients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a poor prognosis, even in the rituximab era. Several studies have reported the clinical importance of the peripheral blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in various malignancies, including lymphoma. However, the prognostic value of the LMR in relapsed/refractory DLBCL has not been well evaluated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the LMR at relapse can predict clinical outcomes for relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients treated with rituximab.Patients and MethodsWe analyzed data on 74 patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, who were initially treated with R-CHOP (rituximab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) or an R–CHOP-like regimen.ResultsThere was a significant association between a low LMR (≤ 2.6) and shorter overall survival (OS; P < .001) and progression-free survival (PFS; P < .001) compared with the high LMR group (> 2.6). Multivariate analysis showed that LMR was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P < .001) and PFS (P < .001), as was the international prognostic index (IPI) at relapse for OS. In addition, the LMR had an incremental value for OS and PFS compared with the IPI at relapse.ConclusionThe LMR predicts OS and PFS outcomes in relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients treated with rituximab, and might facilitate better stratification among patients in low- and intermediate-risk IPI groups.     

Pretransplantation positron emission tomography scan is the main predictor of autologous stem cell transplantation outcome in aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND.

Limited data exist about the role of second‐line chemotherapy response assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) as a prognostic factor in patients with aggressive non‐Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The objective of this analysis was to investigate the main determinants of prognosis in patients with aggressive B‐cell NHL who undergo ASCT, focusing on the impact of pretransplantation PET, secondary age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index (sAA‐IPI) score, histology, and previous response to first‐line chemotherapy.

METHODS.

Seventy‐five patients with diffuse, large B‐cell lymphoma or grade 3 follicular lymphoma who were treated at the author' institution with second‐line chemotherapy (combined ifosfamide, etoposide, and epirubicin [IEV]) followed by ASCT between September 2002 and September 2006 were included. All patients were evaluated by PET after 1 to 3 courses of IEV chemotherapy before ASCT, and all patients received a conditioning regimen of combined carmustine, etoposide, cytosine arabinoside, and melphalan. The prognostic impact of pretransplantation PET, sAA‐IPI score, histology, and previous response to first‐line chemotherapy was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS.

Seventy‐two of 75 patients underwent ASCT. In a univariate analysis for progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), a significant association was observed with pretransplantation PET (PFS, P < .00001; OS, P < .01) and previous first‐line response (PFS, P = .02; OS, P = .04). In the multivariate framework, pretransplantation PET was identified as the only independent prognostic factor (PFS, P < .001; OS, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS.

The current data indicated that pretransplantation PET is the main prognostic predictor in patients with aggressive B‐cell NHL who are scheduled for ASCT. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.     

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: prognostic features and outcomes

Between January 1990 and April 2001, 115 patients received high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). With a median follow-up of 58 months (range, 1 - 175 months), 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 46% and 58%, respectively. Twelve patients with primary refractory disease had a 5-year PFS of 41% and OS of 58%, not significantly different from those of the remaining cohort. Early and overall regimen related mortality were 7% and 16%, respectively. Male gender (P = 0.04) and a time to relapse (TTR) < 12 months (P = 0.03) were associated with decreased OS by univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, TTR < 12 months remained statistically significant (P = 0.04). We have confirmed that HDT and ASCT result in long-term survival for a proportion of patients with relapsed or refractory HL. All patients, including those with primary refractory disease, benefited from HDT and ASCT.     

Bcl‐2, Bcl‐6, and the International Prognostic Index are prognostic indicators in patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma treated with rituximab‐containing chemotherapy

This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological prognostic parameters of de novo diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the rituximab era. We examined the correlation of 22 clinicopathological parameters with progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and primary refractory disease in 285 DLBCL patients treated with rituximab‐containing chemotherapy. Complete response rate was 87%, overall response rate was 91%, 5‐year PFS rate was 72%, and 5‐year OS rate was 91%. By log–rank test, higher International Prognostic Index (IPI) (P < 0.0001), Bcl‐2 positivity (P = 0.0013), Bcl‐6 negativity (P = 0.0112), and no irradiation (P = 0.0371) were significantly correlated with shorter PFS; higher IPI (P = 0.0107), starry sky pattern (P = 0.0466), and no irradiation (P = 0.0264) correlated with shorter OS. In multivariate analyses, higher IPI (P = 0.0006), Bcl‐2 positivity (P = 0.0015), and Bcl‐6 negativity (P = 0.04) were significantly correlated with shorter PFS; higher IPI (P = 0.0045) correlated with shorter OS. Bcl‐2 (P = 0.0029), Bcl‐6 (P = 0.002), and IPI (P < 0.0001) were significantly correlated with primary refractory disease. In conclusion, Bcl‐2 positivity, Bcl‐6 negativity, and higher IPI were indicators of shorter PFS and OS plus primary refractory disease in patients with DLBCL in the rituximab era.     

LACE‐conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: treatment outcome and risk factor analysis from a single centre

High‐dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a recognized treatment option for patients with relapsed diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. We have analysed 51 patients who underwent ASCT after LACE (lomustine (CCNU), cytarabine (Ara‐C), cyclophosphamide, etoposide) conditioning for relapsed (n = 34, 67%) or primary refractory (n = 17, 33%) diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. With a median follow‐up of 60 months (range 2–216) the probabilities of overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) at 5 years were 47 and 42%, respectively. The cumulative treatment‐related mortality was 10% (n = 5). Probabilities for OS and PFS at 5 years were 56 and 50% for patients with chemosensitive and 29 and 27% for patients with chemorefractory disease. In multivariate analysis abnormal pre‐ASCT levels of C‐reactive protein (>5 mg/L) were identified as a risk factor for worse OS, whereas abnormal pre‐ASCT levels of C‐reactive protein and chemoresistance predicted inferior PFS. LACE followed by ASCT is an effective treatment for approximately half of patients with chemosensitive relapsed diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma, and a proportion of chemorefractory patients also benefit. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

ABVD方案治疗复发/难治弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的临床分析

目的研究吡柔比星+博来霉素+长春新碱+氮烯咪胺(ABVD)方案挽救化疗复发/难治弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的疗效和安全性。方法回顾性分析2011年1月至2017年3月收治的无法接受强烈化疗或自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT),接受ABVD方案挽救化疗的复发/难治DLBCL患者35例。ABVD方案如下:吡柔比星25 mg/m^2静滴d_1、d₁₅,博来霉素10 mg/m^2静滴d_1、d₁₅,长春新碱1.4 mg/m^2静滴d_1、d₁₅,氮烯咪胺375 mg/m^2静滴d_1、d₁₅。28天为1个周期,化疗6个周期。观察近期疗效、1年生存率、总生存时间(OS)和不良反应。结果随访截止于2019年3月,中位随访14.4个月。全组患者经ABVD方案挽救化疗后,获CR 8例、PR 17例、SD 6例、PD 4例;有效率(RR)为71.5%,疾病控制率(DCR)为88.6%。中位缓解持续时间为3.5个月(95%CI:3.13~3.87个月),1年生存率为45.7%,中位OS为13.0个月(95%CI:11.90~14.10个月)。25例国际预后指数(IPI)评分低中危组患者(0~2分)的RR、DCR、1年生存率、中位OS分别为84.0%、100.0%、60.0%和14.0个月(95%CI:12.71~15.30个月),均高于10例中高危组患者(3~4分)的40.0%、60.0%、10.0%和6.0个月(95%CI:3.65~8.35个月),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);而不同CD5表达情况以及ABVD方案不同治疗线程的患者上述指标的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。全组主要不良反应为骨髓抑制和消化道反应,发生率分别为61.8%(24/35)和14.3%(5/35),以1~2级为主。结论 ABVD方案对多次化疗、无法接受强烈化疗或ASCT的低中危型复发/难治DLBCL疗效可靠、耐受性好,值得进一步临床研究。     

Total lesion glycolysis in positron emission tomography is a better predictor of outcome than the International Prognostic Index for patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND:

This study was undertaken to evaluate the prognostic value of quantitative metabolic parameters in [¹⁸F]2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxyglucose (FDG)‐positron emission tomography (PET) for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

METHODS:

A total of 140 DLBCL patients underwent FDG‐PET scans before rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R‐CHOP) chemotherapy. The maximal standardized uptake value (SUV_max) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated, with the margin thresholds as 25%, 50%, and 75% of SUV_max of all lesions. Treatment outcomes were compared between groups according to metabolic parameters and the International Prognostic Index (IPI).

RESULTS:

After a median follow‐up of 28.5 months (range, 5‐81 months), the 2‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 83% and 87%, respectively. Among metabolic parameters, TLG at the threshold of 50% (TLG₅₀) was significantly associated with treatment outcomes. High TLG₅₀ values (>415.5) were associated with reduced survivals compared with low TLG₅₀ values (≤415.5) (2‐year PFS of 73% versus 92%, P = .007; and 2‐year OS of 81% versus 93%, P = .031). High IPI score (≥3) significantly reduced OS (2‐year OS of 79% versus 90%, P = .049). Ann Arbor stage III/IV adversely affected PFS (P = .013). However, high IPI score and Ann Arbor stage of III/V did not significantly shorten PFS (P = .200) and OS (P = .921), respectively. High TLG₅₀ values independently predicted survivals by multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 4.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.5‐13.1; P = .008 for PFS and hazard ratio = 3.1; 95% confidence interval = 1.0‐9.6; P = .049 for OS).

CONCLUSIONS:

Combined assessment of volume and metabolism (ie, TLG) is predictive of survivals in DLBCL patients who are treated with R‐CHOP. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

The Absolute Monocyte and Lymphocyte Prognostic Index for Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Who Receive R-CHOP

BackgroundThe baseline absolute monocyte count and absolute lymphocyte count were used to generate a prognostic index (the AMLPI) for survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).MethodsData from 245 patients with DLBCL who were treated with standard R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine sulfate, prednisone) were reviewed. By using the values previously reported for the AMLPI, its prognostic value was examined in our population.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 22 months for censored observations, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates for the international prognostic index (IPI) 0-2 and 3-5 risk groups were 73% and 58%, respectively (P = .0004); comparable overall survival (OS) rates were 88% and 68%, respectively (P < .0001). For patients with IPI scores of 0-2, 1-year PFS rates for AMLPI low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 92%, 89%, and 80%, respectively (P = .022); comparable 1-year OS rates were 96%, 95%, and 80%, respectively (P = .049). By multivariate analysis, with the adjustment of IPI in the model, AMLPI effects (low- vs. high-risk groups) on PFS and OS rates were significant, with P = .046 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.402 [95% CI, 0.164-0.986] and P = .052 (HR 0.325 [95% CI, 0.104-1.011]), respectively.ConclusionsThe absolute monocyte and lymphocyte counts prognostic index (the AMLPI) may add prognostic value beyond that of the IPI for patients with DLBCL who receive R-CHOP.     

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of relapsed follicular lymphoma after autologous stem cell transplantation in the rituximab era

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a therapeutic option for patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL). The clinical characteristics and outcomes of FL relapse after ASCT in the rituximab era have not yet been fully elucidated. We retrospectively reviewed 414 FL patients treated with ASCT between 2000 and 2014 in four hematology departments. All patients received rituximab as a first-line treatment. We specifically analyzed the clinical characteristics, treatment strategies at relapse, and outcomes of 95 patients (23%) who relapsed after ASCT. The patients (median age, 57 y) received a median of two lines of therapy (range, 2-6) prior to ASCT, with 92% in complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) before ASCT. Histological transformation at relapse after ASCT was observed in 20% of the patients. Treatment at relapse after ASCT consisted of chemotherapy with or without rituximab (n = 45/90, 50%), targeted agents (18%), rituximab monotherapy (14%), or consolidation allogeneic transplantation after induction chemotherapy (12%) and radiotherapy (6%). After relapse, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1 year (95% CI, 0.541-1.579) and 5.5 years (95% CI, 1.910-9.099), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, histological transformation (HT) was associated with OS (P = .044; HR 2.439; 95% CI, 1.025-5.806), and a high FLIPI score at relapse was associated with PFS (P = .028; HR 2.469; 95% CI, 1.104-5.521). This retrospective study showed that the period of PFS of patients who relapsed after ASCT is short. A biopsy should be performed for these patients to document the HT. Our results indicate that new treatment strategies will need to be developed for these patients.     

Prolonged survival after second autologous transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance for salvage treatment of myeloma patients at first relapse after prior autograft

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as part of the primary therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) is standard practice. In contrast, the role of a second ASCT (ASCT2) and subsequent lenalidomide maintenance for relapsed disease remains unclear. In this study, we analysed 86 consecutive MM patients with a first relapse after prior ASCT receiving either a second ASCT or conventional chemotherapy. After a median follow‐up of 37.7 months since first relapse, 54 (62.8%) patients were still alive and 29 (33.7%) without progression. Sixty‐one (71.0%) patients received ASCT2 and had better progression‐free survival (PFS) (30.2 versus 13.0 mo; P = .0262) and overall survival (OS) rates (129.6 versus 33.5 mo; P = .0003) compared with 25 (29.0%) patients with conventional treatment. Patients relapsing later than 12 months after ASCT1 benefitted from a second ASCT with better PFS2 (P = .0179) and OS2 (P = .0009). Finally, lenalidomide maintenance after ASCT2 was associated with longer PFS (41.0 vs 21.6 mo; P = .0034) and better OS (not yet reached vs 129.6 mo; P = .0434) compared with patients without maintenance. Our data suggest that a second ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance given at first relapse in MM after prior ASCT are associated with better survival rates.     

Late Relapses After High-dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in the Rituximab Era

BackgroundThe standard of care for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapsing after front-line therapy is high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Evidence has suggested that early relapses (ie, within 1 year) after this approach portends exceptionally poor outcomes. However, data examining relapses > 1 year after ASCT for patients with refractory or relapsed DLBCL are limited, in particular, in the rituximab era. We sought to examine the effect of early (≤ 1 year) and late (> 1 year) relapse after ASCT in a single-institution cohort of patients with relapsed and refractory DLBCL treated with chemoimmunotherapy.Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the data from 85 consecutive patients who had undergone ASCT for biopsy-confirmed relapsed or refractory DLBCL from 2001 to 2010 at the University of Rochester Medical Center. All patients had received rituximab as a part of treatment. Of the 85 patients, 35 developed relapse after ASCT. These 35 patients were divided into 2 groups according to the timing of the relapse (≤ 1 year and > 1 year after ASCT).ResultsThe median follow-up period was 6.4 years. For all patients, the overall survival (OS) from post-ASCT relapse was 5.2 years. For the 27 patients developing relapse at ≤ 1 year after ASCT, the median OS was 0.6 year and progression-free survival was 0.4 year. For the 8 patients developing relapse at > 1 year after ASCT, the median OS was 5.9 years and progression-free survival was 2.9 years.ConclusionPatients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL experiencing relapse > 1 year after ASCT had good outcomes. Despite the relative rarity in incidence, a significant risk of relapse of DLBCL after ASCT remains, suggesting the need for continued monitoring because of the possibility of later progression.     

含利妥昔单抗化疗方案治疗套细胞淋巴瘤效果分析

目的探讨含利妥昔单抗化疗方案治疗套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)患者效果及预后影响因素。方法回顾性分析2007年6月至2018年11月苏州大学附属第一医院血液科收治的56例≤65岁MCL患者临床资料,化疗方案中均包括利妥昔单抗,观察临床特征、治疗方案及生物学指标对总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)的影响。结果56例患者中位发病年龄57岁,男性43例,女性13例。24例接受R-CHOP方案化疗;29例接受含阿糖胞苷方案化疗,其中15例接受R-hyper CVAD/R-MA方案化疗,14例接受R-CHOP/R-DAHP交替治疗;3例接受其他方案化疗。19例接受自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT)巩固治疗。56例患者中位OS时间74个月,2年OS率83.8%,3年OS率70.9%,2年PFS率72.0%,3年PFS率49.7%。国际预后指数(IPI)评分和治疗中是否接受ASCT是MCL患者OS和PFS的独立影响因素。含阿糖胞苷治疗组总有效率(ORR)93.1%,优于R-CHOP方案组(83.3%),差异无统计学意义(χ²=0.465,P=0.495);两组间OS及PFS差异均无统计学意义(OS:χ²=0.291,P=0.590;PFS:χ²=0.912,P=0.339)。诱导化疗达缓解的MCL患者中,ASCT巩固治疗可延长中位OS时间(72个月比124个月,χ²=3.973,P=0.040)及中位PFS时间(34个月比90个月,χ²=3.984,P=0.046)。简化MCL国际预后指数(sMIPI)评分中高危组患者中接受ASCT巩固治疗患者OS和PFS优于未接受ASCT治疗者(OS:χ²=5.037,P=0.025;PFS:χ²=6.787,P=0.009),而sMIPI评分低危组患者中,是否接受ASCT组间OS、PFS差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论含阿糖胞苷的化疗方案对改善MCL患者的预后和生存并不理想。对于诱导化疗达缓解及sMIPI评分中高危组的MCL患者,ASCT巩固治疗可改善其预后,可作为年轻患者的一线巩固治疗方案。     

Chemoresistance can be overcome with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation for relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

BackgroundHigh-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplant (HDT/ASCT) is the preferred treatment of chemosensitive relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The role for HDT/ASCT in chemoresistant HL is less well defined. We evaluated long-term outcomes of relapsed/refractory HL patients whose disease was refractory to secondary chemotherapy preceding HDT/ASCT.Patients and methodsAll HL patients who underwent HDT/ASCT in British Columbia for primary progression (PP, defined as progression within 3 months of initial therapy completion) or first relapse (REL1) were reviewed. Patients were grouped based on response to secondary chemotherapy as sensitive (S), resistant (R), and untested/unknown (U).ResultsA total of 256 patients underwent HDT/ASCT for PP (35%) or REL1 (65%) between 1985 and 2011. At median follow-up of 11.7 years, 58% were alive without HL, 36% relapsed; 6% died of transplant-related mortality, 3% secondary malignancies, and 3% unrelated causes. For PP/S, PP/R, and PP/U groups, 10-year FFS were 47%, 31%, and 38%; 10-year OS were 52%, 29%, and 37%, respectively. For REL1/S, REL1/R, and REL1/U groups, 10-year FFS were 64%, 51%, and 81%; 10-year OS were 71%, 59%, and 79%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, resistance to secondary chemotherapy predicted for post-transplant mortality in the PP (P = 0.04) but not REL1 (P = 0.16) groups.ConclusionIn this large uniformly treated cohort of HL patients with long-term follow-up, chemoresistance preceding HDT/ASCT was identified as a poor prognostic factor; however, this factor can be partially overcome by HDT/ASCT, resulting in cure in 30%–50% of patients. HDT/ASCT should therefore be considered in all transplant eligible patients, regardless of responsiveness to salvage chemotherapy.     

Effect of addition of rituximab to salvage chemotherapy on outcome of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma relapsing after an autologous stem-cell transplantation

BackgroundWe have investigated if rituximab-based salvage regimens improve response rates and survival of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapsing after an autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT).Patients and methodsWe have retrospectively analyzed 82 patients with DLBCL who received salvage therapy for relapse or progression after ASCT. Patients were divided into two groups, according to whether rituximab-based salvage regimens were given (n = 42, ‘R-’ group) or not (n = 40, ‘R+’ group) after ASCT.ResultsPatients in the R+ group had better complete remission (CR) (55% versus 21.4%, P = 0.006) and overall response (OR) (75% versus 40.4%, P = 0.001) rates, and better 3-year event-free survival (EFS) (37% versus 9%, P = 0.002) and overall survival (OS) (50% versus 20%, P = 0.005) than patients in the R- group. Patients retreated with rituximab had better CR (42.9% versus 21.4%, P = 0.032) and OR (66.7% versus 40.4%, P = 0.019) rates, and better OS (36.2% versus 20% at 3 years, P = 0.05) and EFS (36.2% versus 9% at 3 years, P = 0.05) than patients who received chemotherapy alone at relapse after ASCT.ConclusionsThe addition of rituximab to salvage chemotherapy improves response rates and EFS in patients with relapsed DLBCL after ASCT. These patients may benefit from rituximab retreatment, although larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.     

Clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment outcome of the addition of rituximab to chemotherapy for CD5-positive in comparison with CD5-negative diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Background: CD5-positive (CD5+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) comprises ∼10% of DLBCLs, and it is associated with poor prognosis. The clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of CD5-negative (CD5-) DLBCL and CD5+ DLBCL were compared.Patients and methods: The subjects were 607 DLBCL patients in whom cell surface markers could be analyzed, among 930 consecutive patients registered in the Adult Lymphoma Treatment Study Group between 1998 and 2008.Results: In all, 102 patients (16.8%) had CD5+ DLBCL. Compared with CD5- DLBCL, CD5+ DLBCL was more closely associated with elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level, advanced stage, poor performance status, extranodal sites, CD10-, BCL-2+, MUM1+, and nongerminal center B-cell type. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of CD5+ DLBCL (n = 102) and CD5- DLBCL (n = 505) were 55% and 65%, respectively (P = 0.032), with 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of 52% and 61%, respectively (P = 0.041). In the CD5+ DLBCL patients, the addition of rituximab to chemotherapy significantly improved PFS (4-year PFS, 47.4% versus 62.5%), but not OS (4-year OS, 57.8% versus 63.5%).Conclusions: For CD5+ DLBCL, the addition of rituximab to chemotherapy significantly improved the PFS, but not OS. Therefore, it is thought that a new treatment strategy is necessary for CD5+ DLBCL.     

Ofatumumab,Etoposide, and Cytarabine Intensive Mobilization Regimen in Patients with High-risk Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

BackgroundMore than one-half of high-risk patients with relapsed/refractory (rr) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapse after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). In this phase II study, we investigate the long-term outcomes of high-risk patients with rrDLBCL receiving intensive consolidation therapy (ICT) with OVA (ofatumumab, etoposide, and high-dose cytarabine) prior to auto-HCT.Patients and MethodsThe primary endpoints were the ability of OVA to mobilize peripheral stem cells and the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate following OVA. Secondary endpoints included safety, 2-year overall survival (OS), impact of cell of origin (COO), and the prognostic utility of next-generation sequencing minimal residual disease (MRD) testing. We simultaneously retrospectively assessed the outcomes of DLBCL patients who underwent ICT with a similar regimen at our institution.ResultsTwenty-seven patients received salvage chemotherapy, with a response rate of 25% in patients with germinal center B-cell (GCB)-DLBCL versus 92% in patients with non-GCB-DLBCL (P = .003). Nineteen responding patients underwent ICT with OVA (100% successful stem cell mobilization). The 2-year PFS and OS rate was 47% and 59%, respectively, with no difference based on COO. Similar findings were observed when the study and retrospective cohorts were combined. Neutropenia was the most common toxicity (47%). MRD-negative patients at the completion of salvage had a median OS of not reached versus 3.5 months in MRD-positive patients (P = .02).ConclusionsOVA followed by auto-HCT is effective and safe for high-risk rrDLBCL. Patients with GCB-DLBCL had a lower response to salvage chemotherapy, but no difference in outcomes based on COO was seen after auto-HCT. MRD testing in the relapsed setting was predictive of long-term survival.     

Clinical impact of controlling nutritional status score on the prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is a nutritional index calculated from serum albumin and total cholesterol levels and lymphocyte counts. Its role in predicting clinical outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has not been evaluated. In this retrospective study, data from 476 patients with DLBCL were analyzed. The cutoff value of the CONUT score was set as 4. CONUT score significantly stratified the overall survival (OS) and the progression-free-survival (PFS) (5-year OS, 49.0% vs 83.2%, P < .001; 5-year PFS, 46.1% vs 73.1%, P < .001) of the patients. Among patients at high-intermediate or high risk, as per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI), 5-year OS was lower in patients with high CONUT scores than in those with low CONUT scores (high-intermediate risk, 51.2% vs 75.5%, P < .001; high risk, 29.9% vs 63.3%, P = .007). Additionally, in patients with high CONUT scores, maintenance of relative dose intensity (RDI) of chemotherapy did not affect the 5-year OS (RDI > 80% vs RDI ≤ 80%: 59.8% vs 50.9%, P = .73). In the present study, we have demonstrated that the CONUT score is an independent prognostic factor in patients with DLBCL.