微创治疗粘连性肠梗阻

目的:探索中西医结合疗法与腹腔镜技术分阶段联合微创治疗粘连性肠梗阻的效果。方法:粘连性肠梗阻31例,在急性期以中西医结合疗法辨证施治,解除急性梗阻;缓解期行腹腔镜粘连松解术,根除梗阻。结果:31例急性期经中西医结合治疗,肠梗阻均解除。缓解期行腹腔镜粘连松解术,成功26例(83.9％);中转开腹手术5例(16.1％)。腹腔镜粘连松解术后胃肠功能恢复时间0.5-2d;术后住院2-4d。26例腹腔镜粘连松解术后随访,均未再发肠梗阻表现,治愈率100％。结论:中西医结合与腹腔镜联合微创治疗粘连性肠梗阻中转开腹率低,并发症发生率低,术后效果好,无再发梗阻。     

三阶段微创治疗急性粘连性肠梗阻

目的:建立分阶段中西医结合与腹腔镜微创手术联合治疗急性粘连性肠梗阻的方案,并探讨此方案的治疗效果。方法:将1997年10月至2004年12月急性粘连性肠梗阻173例患者分为三个阶段进行中西医结合微创联合治疗。第1阶段:急性期中西医结合非手术治疗解除梗阻,未解除梗阻者行急症腹腔镜探查或剖腹手术。第2阶段:缓解期行腹腔镜肠粘连松解术,去除引起肠梗阻的病因。第3阶段:是疗效巩固期,用中药治疗以避免术后粘连性肠梗阻再发。结果:术后随访,三阶段联合治疗71例,复发4例(5.6%);单纯中西医结合非手术治疗39例,复发24例(61.5%);开腹行肠粘连松解术15例,复发5例(33.3%)。急症腹腔镜手术15例,中转开腹7例(46.7%),发生并发症6例(40%);择期腹腔镜手术77例,中转开腹6例(7.8%),发生并发症6例(7.8%)。结论:分阶段中西医结合微创联合治疗急性粘连性肠梗阻的效果明显优于单一治疗方式。     

腹腔镜在肠粘连松解术中的应用体会

目的探讨腹腔镜下肠粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的应用价值。方法回顾分析32例粘连性肠梗阻行腹腔镜下肠粘连松解术的临床资料。结果26例腹腔镜下完成肠粘连松解术,4例在小切口辅助下完成手术,2例中转开腹手术。随访12-36月,均无肠梗阻复发。结论在掌握手术指征、规范操作及把握好中转开腹指征的前提下,腹腔镜手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻安全可行,具有创伤小、恢复快、再粘连率低等优点。     

三阶段中西医结合微创治疗急性粘连性肠梗阻

目的:建立分阶段中西医结合与腹腔镜微创手术联合治疗急性粘连性肠梗阻的方案,并评估该方案的可行性、有效性和优势.方法:39例急性粘连性肠梗阻,在急性期行中西医结合非手术治疗,在缓解期根据是否具备指征选用腹腔镜粘连松解术,术后再用中药治疗.施行上述三阶段治疗者为三阶段中西医结合微创治疗组.治疗后随访1年以上,比较治疗结果.结果:三阶段治疗组复发率5.1%,显著低于中西医结合非手术组的29.3%和开腹手术组的21.4%.结论:分阶段中西医结合微创联合治疗粘连性肠梗阻,效果明显优于其他任何单一治疗方式.     

腹腔镜治疗粘连性肠梗阻42例报告

目的:探讨腹腔镜下肠粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的可行性及疗效。方法:总结2001年1月至2007年12月42例粘连性小肠梗阻患者行腹腔镜粘连松解术,并配合留置医用生物蛋白胶或透明质酸钠防止再粘连的临床资料。结果:40例应用腹腔镜成功实施粘连松解术,未出现手术并发症和过敏现象,随访3~36个月,无肠梗阻症状复发;2例中转开腹。结论:腹腔镜肠粘连松解术配合生物蛋白胶治疗粘连性肠梗阻安全实用,疗效满意,是处理粘连性肠梗阻的有效手段之一。     

中西医结合微创治疗粘连性肠梗阻

目的探讨中西医结合微创治疗粘连性肠梗阻的方法，提高粘连性肠梗阻的治疗效果。方法利用中西医结合微创治疗粘连性肠梗阻9例，其中因束带粘连致小肠梗阻者，在腹腔镜下切除束带；小肠与腹壁粘连成角及小肠、网膜与腹壁粘连者，用电凝分离剪或分离钳分离与腹壁的粘连。结果全部病例均无手术并发症发生。随防2—24个月，均无梗阻症状复发。结论利用中西医结合微创治疗粘连性肠梗阻是安全实用的，可以提高粘连性肠梗阻的治疗效果。     

腹腔镜治疗小儿肠粘连26例报告

目的:探讨腹腔镜治疗小儿术后粘连性肠梗阻的可行性和适应证。方法:回顾分析1994年至2004年8月因粘连性肠梗阻行腹腔镜下肠粘连松解术26例的临床资料。结果:24例手术成功,2例中转开腹,无术后并发症,随访未见复发。结论:腹腔镜肠粘连松解术切口小、腹膜创面小,腹腔干扰少,能较大限度地减少术后腹腔内再粘连,为粘连性肠梗阻的外科治疗提供了一种新方法,不仅在成人,在小儿肠粘连中也可应用。     

腹腔镜肠粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻体会

目的总结腹腔镜下肠粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的体会。方法采用腹腔镜下肠粘连松解术治疗26例腹腔手术后粘连性肠梗阻,对患者的诊治资料进行回顾性分析。结果本组26例患者中,22例顺利完成手术。手术时间34~145 min。患者术后第1天开始下床活动,术后26~48 h恢复肛门排气后,拔除胃管开始进流质食物。仅3例患者术后使用止痛剂。3例患者因肠袢致密粘连成团、腔镜下粘连松解困难,1例患者因多段小肠肠管与原腹壁切口致密粘连,松解时肠管多处损伤而中转开腹完成手术。术后未发生肠瘘、腹腔感染等并发症,住院时间4~9 d,顺利出院。随访6~12个月,无1例肠梗阻复发者。结论对非手术治疗无效的粘性梗阻患者,采用腹腔镜下肠粘连松解术,具有适应证宽、创伤小、对腹腔脏器干扰轻、术后患者胃肠功能恢复快、并发症少等优势。但必须把握好手术适应证和中转开腹的时机。     

腹腔镜下粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的探讨

目的:探讨腹腔镜下粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻的方法及临床效果。方法:对46例诊断明确、临床症状基本缓解的粘连性肠梗阻患者,行择期腹腔镜下粘连松解术。设定气腹压力为12~15mm Hg,3~4个操作孔。其中粘连带致肠梗阻者切除粘连带,小肠与腹壁粘连成角及小肠网膜与腹壁粘连者用电凝分离剪、分离钳分离与腹壁的粘连;对粘连广泛致密腹腔镜操作困难者,可做辅助小切口,手助完成手术。结果:35例腹腔镜下完成粘连松解术,3例因粘连致密分离困难,做辅助小切口完成手术;7例不能造气腹中转开腹;1例分离时小肠破裂中转开腹。随访腹腔镜完成手术者3~48个月,梗阻均无复发。结论:腹腔镜粘连松解术治疗粘连性肠梗阻安全实用,临床效果可靠。具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少、住院时间短等优点。     

粘连性肠梗阻腹腔镜肠粘连松解术手术方法选择

探讨粘连性肠梗阻急性期、恢复期实施腹腔镜松解术的效果.2016年12月—2019年12月,粘连性肠梗阻急性发作期实施腹腔镜下粘连松解术病例34例(对照组),粘连性肠梗阻恢复期择期实施腹腔镜下+辅助小切口肠粘连松解术病例71例中,随机选取34例(观察组),比较两组的手术情况.结果显示,观察组的中转开腹率、肠梗阻复发率、肠...     

Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in acute small bowel obstruction: a preliminary experience.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate laparoscopy as another tool for management of cases of adhesive acute small bowel obstruction. METHODS: Fourteen patients suffering from suspected adhesive small bowel obstruction were explored laparoscopically over a period of 24 months. The Veress needle was inserted either in a virgin part of the abdomen away from previous scars or under direct vision using an open technique. Careful inspection of the entire abdomen was done, and the small bowel was "run" in a retrograde fashion starting at the cecum. The point of obstruction was localized and adhesiolysis was performed, thus resolving the problem. RESULTS: Laparoscopic exploration was able to determine the site and cause of obstruction precisely in all 14 cases, with resolution of the problem laparoscopically in 12 patients (85.7%). Two cases were converted to open surgery (14.3%). There were no mortalities and low morbidity (7.1%). The mean hospital stay was 3.7 days. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery can be an advantageous alternative to open surgery in acute small bowel obstruction, thus providing a new technique for its diagnosis and treatment with all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.     

Elective laparoscopy in diagnosis and treatment of recurrent small bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of laparoscopy in diagnosis and treatment of recurrent small bowel obstruction. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 253 patients who underwent therapeutic laparoscopy for recurrent small bowel obstruction from June 1996 to May 2005 was carried out. Patients with acute small bowel obstruction, bowel obstruction due to tumor, and obstructed inguinal hernias were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: Laparoscopy diagnosed cause of obstruction in all except 3 (1.18%) patients. The etiology included adhesions (38%), incarcerated ventral incisional hernias (32%), Meckel diverticulum (7%), stricture (14%), volvulus (3%), intussusception (4%). One hundred sixty nine patients were managed totally laparoscopically with adhesiolysis. Therapeutic bowel intervention other than adhesiolysis was required in 84 patients, of which 33 procedures were performed totally laparoscopically and remaining 51 procedures were completed with laparoscopically guided target incision. Five patients required conversion to open celiotomy. Iatrogenic enterotomies occurred in 3 patients and small bowel perforation during manipulation occurred in 1 patient. Postoperative procedure-related complications were seen in 44 patients. There was one mortality due to postoperative arrhythmia and cardiac failure. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic diagnosis and treatment of recurrent small bowel obstruction is feasible, safe, and can be performed electively in selected cases.     

Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND: Conventional surgical management of acute small bowel obstruction involves laparotomy. The laparoscopic approach has not been favoured due to the presumed increased risk of bowel injury. METHODS: A retrospective review of our experience of laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction was undertaken. Nine patients were identified from 1997 to 2003. The aetiology of obstruction was identified laparoscopically in all cases. Eight cases were caused by bands or local adhesions and one patient had a bezoar. RESULTS: Laparoscopic treatment was successful in 78% of patients including one laparoscopy-assisted procedure. Conversion to laparotomy was performed in two patients, one due to difficult adhesiolysis and one due to iatrogenic bowel injury during adhesiolysis. The mean operating time was 74 minutes. There were no postoperative complications and the mean length of hospital stay was 4.3 days. CONCLUSION: This small series demonstrates that laparoscopy can serve as a good diagnostic tool as well as treatment of acute small bowel obstruction. In an appropriately selected patient, laparoscopic management of small bowel obstruction is a feasible therapeutic approach and appears to convey the benefits of a short postoperative hospital stay, reduced postoperative complications and possibly reduced subsequent adhesion formation.     

Laparoscopic approach to postoperative adhesive obstruction

Background Some authors have assessed the feasibility of laparoscopy in the treatment of postoperative adhesive obstruction, but conclusions about its effectiveness are related to different selection criteria used for surgery. This paper reports on our experience in laparoscopic adhesiolysis and analyses the results on the basis of the selection criteria used.Methods From January 1993 to December 2001, 65 patients were submitted to laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction according to specific selection criteria. Of the 65 patients, 40 were admitted for acute obstruction and 25 for chronic or recurrent transit disturbances. Correlation between historical and clinical data and the results of surgical treatment were statistically analyzed.Results The procedure was completed by laparoscopy in 52 patients (conversion rate: 20%). Mean postoperative stay was 4.4 days with a 12.3% morbidity and no mortality. Recurrence rate was 15.4%; a single correlation was found between recurrence and age.Conclusions Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in the treatment of small bowel obstructions seems to be effective; further studies are required to define selection criteria for surgery and confirm real advantages in terms of recurrences.     

生长抑素联合经肛肠梗阻导管在远端结肠恶性肠梗阻老年病人中的应用

目的评价生长抑素联合经肛肠梗阻减压导管在远端结肠恶性肠梗阻治疗中的应用价值。方法回顾分析2010年9月至2016年11月经手术治疗的57例急性完全性远端结肠恶性梗阻老年病人(年龄均≥70岁),2013年以来济宁市第一人民医院采用经肛肠梗阻导管治疗部分肠梗阻病人,31例经生长抑素持续静脉泵入及经肛置入肠梗阻导管综合治疗4~10 d,平均(5.6±1.2)d,后行腹腔镜或剖腹探查;26例经生长抑素持续静脉泵入治疗后行手术治疗。结果 31例经生长抑素及经肛置入肠梗阻导管综合治疗的病人术前腹痛及腹胀症状均得以缓解;与入院时腹围(100%)相比,术前腹围明显缩小,为(81±2.3)%(P=0.001);综合治疗后3 d行腹部CT检查,测量近端结肠最大横径为(2.8±0.3)cm,明显小于治疗前的(6.2±0.5)cm(P=0.001);31例病人均行手术治疗,其中18例病人行腹腔镜探查手术,11例完成根治手术并行一期吻合(腹腔镜下完成7例),20例行肿瘤切除并近端结肠造口术,术后病人均无严重并发症。26例经生长抑素持续静脉泵入治疗病人中,仅5例行一期吻合,无一例在腹腔镜下完成,术后1例出现肠瘘并发症。结论生长抑素联合经肛肠梗阻导管治疗对急性远端大肠恶性肠梗阻的老年病人安全有效,有较高的腹腔镜手术完成率及一期吻合成功率,降低了围手术期风险,避免了二次手术,减轻了病人的经济负担。     

中西医结合疗法治疗腹部手术后粘连性肠梗阻的临床疗效

为探讨中西医结合疗法治疗腹部手术后粘连性肠梗阻的临床疗效,将35例腹部手术后粘连性肠梗阻患者随机分为两组,一组采用西医治疗（18例,对照组）,一组在西医治疗的基础L予中药液保留灌肠、中药外敷、穴位注射、微波治疗等治疗（17例。观察组）。结果显示,两组患者均治愈。对照组平均肛门排气恢复时间为（4．8±0．9）d,观察组为（2．4±0．9）d;对照组腹部平片示肠梗阻恢复时间平均为（5．6±1．3）d,观察组为（3．3±1,3）d。观察组肠梗阻缓解明显快于对照组,P〈0．01。结果表明,中西医结合疗法治疗鳆部手术后粘连性肠梗附疗效显著。     

Laparoscopic compared with conventional treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopy may be associated with fewer intra-abdominal adhesions and quicker recovery of bowel function, it remains unclear whether patients with acute small bowel obstruction (SBO) might benefit from laparoscopic techniques. METHOD: The results of patients with acute SBO treated laparoscopically (LAP; n = 52) and conventionally (CONV; n = 52) were compared in a retrospective matched-pair analysis. Conversions were included in the laparoscopic group. RESULTS: Complete laparoscopic treatment was performed in 25 patients (48.1 per cent). Major intraoperative complications occurred in 15 patients in the LAP group and eight in the CONV group (P = 0.156). Intraoperative perforations were more frequent in patients who had undergone more than one previous laparotomy (P = 0.066). Postoperative complications occurred in ten patients (19.2 per cent) in the LAP group and in 21 patients (40.4 per cent) who had conventional surgery (P = 0.032). Bowel movements started 3.5 days after operation in the LAP group and 4.4 days after conventional operation (P = 0.001). The length of hospital stay was 11.3 and 18.1 days respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic treatment of acute SBO was feasible in about half of these patients. Postoperative recovery was improved after laparoscopic procedures but the risk of intraoperative complications increased. A laparoscopic approach seems justified in a subset of patients.     

Laparoscopic management of mechanical small bowel obstruction

Background: Laparoscopy is used increasingly for the management of acute abdominal conditions. For many years, previous abdominal surgery and intestinal obstruction have been regarded as contraindications to laparoscopy because there is an increased risk of iatrogenic bowel perforation. The role of laparoscopy in acute small bowel obstruction remains unclear. Methods: Since 1995, data from patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery have been entered prospectively into a database. Patients who underwent surgery before 1995 were added retrospectively to the same database. The charts of all patients treated surgically for mechanical small bowel obstruction were reviewed. Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with success or failure, especially intraoperative complications, conversion, and postoperative morbidity. Stepwise logistic regression was used to assess for independent variables. Results: This study included 83 patients (56 women and 27 men) with a mean age of 56 years (range, 17–91 years). Conversion was necessary in 36 cases (43%). Laparoscopy alone was successful in 47 patients (57%). Intraoperative complications were noted in 16% and postoperative complications in 31% of the patients. Eight reoperations (9%) were necessary. Mortality was 2.4%. Duration of surgery (p < 0.001) and a bowel diameter exceeding 4 cm (p= 0.02) were predictors of conversion. No risk factor for intraoperative complication was identified. Accidental bowel perforation (p= 0.008) and the need for conversion (p= 0.009) were the only independent factors associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Laparoscopic management of small bowel obstruction is possible in roughly 60% of the patients selected for this approach. Morbidity is lower, resumption of a normal diet is faster, and hospital stay is shorter than with patients requiring conversion. No clear predictor of success or failure was identified, but intraoperative complications must be avoided. If the surgeon is widely experienced in advanced laparoscopic surgery and there is a liberal conversion policy, laparoscopy is a valuable alternative to conventional surgery in the management of acute small bowel obstruction. Received: 20 July 1999/Accepted: 22 November 1999/Online publication: 17 April 2000