New perspectives in antiplatelet therapy

Platelet activation is a complex mechanism of response to vascular injury and atherothrombotic disease, leading to thrombus formation. A wide variety of surface receptors -integrins, leucine-rich family receptors, G protein coupled receptors, tyrosine kinase receptors- and intraplatelet molecules support and regulate platelet activation. They are potential targets of antiplatelet therapy for the prevention and treatment of arterial thrombosis. Despite the overall clinical benefit of established antiplatelet drugs targeting cyclooxigenase-1 (COX-1), glycoprotein integrin αIIbβ3, and the purinergic P2Y(12) receptor of adenosine diphosphate, a significant proportion of treated patients continue to experience recurrent ischaemic events. This may be in partly attributed to insufficient inhibition of platelet activation. In addition, it should not be underestimated that these drugs are not immune from bleeding complications. The substantial progress in understating the regulation of platelet activation has played a key role in the development of novel antiplatelet agents. Current examples of drug under development and evaluation include: novel P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors (prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel), thrombin receptor PAR-1 antagonists (vorapaxar, atopaxar), new integrin glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and inhibitors targeting the thromboxane receptor (TP), phosphodiesterases, the collagen receptor glycoprotein VI, and intraplatelet signalling molecules. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action and current clinical evaluation of these novel antiplatelet agents.     

Failure of Aspirin to Prevent Atherothrombosis

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) reduces the odds of serious atherothrombotic vascular events and death in a broad category of high risk patients by about one-quarter. The mechanism is believed to be inhibition of thromboxane biosynthesis by inactivation of platelet cyclo-oxygenase-1 enzyme. However, aspirin is not that effective; it still fails to prevent the majority of serious vascular events. Mechanisms that may account for the failure of aspirin to prevent vascular events include non-atherothrombotic causes of vascular disease, non-adherence to aspirin therapy, an inadequate dosage, alternative ‘upstream’ pathways of platelet activation (e.g. via stimulation of the ADP, collagen or thrombin receptors on platelets), aspirin-insensitive thromboxane biosynthesis (e.g. via monocyte cyclo-oxygenase-2), or drugs that interfere with the antiplatelet effects of aspirin. Genetic or acquired factors may further modify the inhibitory effects of aspirin on platelets (e.g. polymorphisms involving platelet-associated proteins, increased platelet turnover states). Identification and treatment of the potential causes of aspirin failure could prevent at least another 20% of serious vascular events (i.e. over and above those that are currently prevented by aspirin). There is currently no role for routine laboratory testing to measure the antiplatelet effects of aspirin. Clinicians should ensure that patients at high risk of atherothrombosis (>3% risk over 5 years) are compliant with aspirin therapy and are taking the correct dosage (75–150 mg/day). Patients who cannot tolerate aspirin, are allergic to aspirin, or have experienced recurrent serious atherothrombotic events whilst taking aspirin, should be treated with clopidogrel, and patients with acute coronary syndromes benefit from the combination of clopidogrel plus aspirin. Future research is required to standardize and validate laboratory testing of the antiplatelet effects of aspirin and to identify treatments that can both improve these laboratory measures and reduce the risk of future atherothrombotic events.     

Resistance to antiplatelet drugs: current status and future research

Platelet reactivity and activation are important factors during the development of atherothrombotic processes and subsequent ischaemic complications. Pharmacological agents that suppress platelet function are proved to be the most efficient in the prevention and treatment of thrombotic complications. As the activation of platelets during thrombus generation involves many complex and redundant pathways, simultaneous use of different antiplatelet drugs that are directed against different targets have been effective in reducing adverse clinical events. The main antiplatelet drugs are aspirin (which inhibits thromboxane synthesis), thienopyridines (which block P2Y12 receptors) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists (which block glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors). In recent years, resistance or nonresponsiveness to antiplatelet therapy has been reported and, more importantly, are linked to the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events. New treatment strategies to overcome nonresponsiveness are being sought. A focus on the development of simple, reproducible and user friendly point-of-care methods to determine aspirin/clopidogrel responsiveness should be undertaken to assist clinicians in tailoring antiplatelet therapy to the individual patient.     

The value of clopidogrel versus aspirin in reducing atherothrombotic events: the CAPRIE study

Atherothrombotic disease is a growing health problem, and is increasingly more costly to manage. Clopidogrel is an advanced, specific adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist, which has been shown to be a highly potent antiplatelet agent. Data from the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events (CAPRIE) study have demonstrated the significantly superior clinical benefit of clopidogrel over aspirin for secondary prevention of atherothrombotic disease, with a relative risk reduction in myocardial infarction, stroke or vascular death of 8.7% (95% confidence interval 0.3, 16.5; P = 0.043). Moreover, clopidogrel demonstrated an amplified clinical benefit versus aspirin in patients at high risk of atherothrombotic events, such as those with a previous history of symptomatic atherothrombotic disease or with major risk factors such as diabetes mellitus or hypercholesterolaemia. On the basis of commonly accepted threshold criteria (Euros 20000 per life-year gained; LYG), clopidogrel in comparison with aspirin is cost-effective for the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic disease (cost per LYG ranging from Euros 19462 to Euros 3256). Economic analyses have demonstrated consistent cost-effectiveness results with clopidogrel in different countries. Moreover, in high-risk patient subgroups the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in comparison with aspirin was evenbetter (cost per LYG ranging from Euros 5900 to Euros 6310). Compared with other treatment strategies used for the prevention of ischaemic or atherothrombotic events, the cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in comparison with aspirin based on CAPRIE is favourable, with most analyses in the intermediate range of cost-effectiveness. The available data thus support the use of clopidogrel as a clinically efficient and cost-effective option for secondary prevention of atherothrombotic disease, particularly in high-risk patients.     

Clopidogrel hydrogen sulphate for atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation is a common cardiac rhythm abnormality with a considerable cardiovascular disease burden worldwide. It is an independent major risk factor for stroke. Stroke prevention with anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents has been an important area of clinical research. Warfarin is the most widely used antithrombotic therapy for stroke prophylaxis for last several years, and now dabigatran (150 mg b.i.d.) is more effective than warfarin in stroke prevention in individuals at increased of stroke. In addition, several studies have evaluated the efficacy of clopidogrel for stroke prophylaxis either alone or in combination with aspirin. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the key findings of the trials looking at the efficacy of clopidogrel in stroke prevention. A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. The trials that evaluated the efficacy of clopidogrel in preventing atherothrombotic events or stroke were also included. EXPERT OPINION: Clopidogrel prevents more vascular events, including stroke, in patients with a recent myocardial infarction, stroke or peripheral vascular disease than aspirin. Combination of clopidogrel and aspirin provides a greater reduction of stroke than aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy, but at an increased risk of bleeding. Dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel and aspirin) is inferior to warfarin in primary stroke prevention for patient with atrial fibrillation and thus should be considered for stroke prophylaxis only in patients ineligible for warfarin. However, with the advent of newer agents, like direct thrombin inhibitors and Factor Xa inhibitors, the role of antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation remains unclear.     

Antiplatelet therapy: thrombin receptor antagonists

Activated platelets stimulate thrombus formation in response to rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque or endothelial cell erosion, promoting atherothrombotic disease. Multiple pathways contribute to platelet activation. Aspirin, an irreversible inhibitor of thromboxane A2 synthesis, in combination with clopidogrel, an inhibitor of P2Y(12) adenosine diphosphate platelet receptors, represent the current standard-of-care of antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome and for those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Although these agents have demonstrated significant clinical benefit, the increased risk of bleeding and the recurrence of thrombotic events represent substantial limitations. Thrombin is one of the most important platelet activators. The inhibition of protease-activated receptor 1 showed a good safety profile in preclinical studies. In fact, phase II studies with vorapaxar (SCH530348) and atopaxar (E5555) showed no increase of bleeding events in addition to the current standard-of-care of antiplatelet therapy. Although the results of phase III trials for both drugs are awaited, this family is a promising new addition to the current clinical practice for patients with atherothrombotic disease, not only as an alternative, but also as additional therapy.     

Pharmacodynamic properties of antiplatelet agents: current knowledge and future perspectives

Platelets play an important role in atherothrombotic disease. The currently available antiplatelet drugs target key steps of platelet activation including thromboxane A(2) synthesis, ADP-mediated signaling, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-mediated platelet aggregation. The improvement of our understanding on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of these drugs enables the tailoring of the most appropriate anti-thrombotic therapy to the individual patient and risk situation in the daily clinical practice. However, current antiplatelet therapies are associated with increased bleeding risk. Thus, further research on platelet functions may give rise to numerous new antiplatelet agents with high anti-thrombotic efficiency and low adverse hemorrhagic side effects.     

Antiplatelet Agents for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes Mellitus

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have accelerated atherothrombotic disease of coronary, cerebral, leg, and other vessels. The major cause of death is cardiovascular, and the risk for a myocardial infarction (MI) in a patient with DM who has never had a MI is the same as a nondiabetic individual who has already had one. In this paper, we review the major reasons for a prothrombotic state in patients with DM: alterations in the intrinsic coagulation and fibrinolytic systems and many abnormalities of platelet function. Increased platelet thromboxane production as well as activation of platelet receptors for fibrinogen and or adenosine diphosphate (ADP) are often present, and can be treated with aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and/or receptor blockers. Review of the major primary prevention trials in DM indicates that a significantly reduced risk for MI or major cardiovascular events may be obtained by enteric-coated aspirin, 81–325 mg/day. There is emerging consensus that this is recommended strategy in adult (aged >30 years) patients with DM who are at high vascular risk. Surveys suggest that this includes virtually every patient with type 2 DM in the US, as well as many patients with complicated type 1 DM. These recommendations are also appropriate for secondary prevention. Data supporting the use of clopidogrel as an alternative drug in the case of aspirin allergy or other contraindications are reviewed. Evidence is presented in support of using aspirin plus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes (ACS), and a meta-analysis of six trials of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors and aspirin in diabetic patients with ACS establishes this regimen as an effective choice. Although bleeding episodes are more common with combined antiplatelet therapy for ACS than for aspirin alone, the benefit of a significant reduction in 30-day mortality appears to outweigh the risk of major bleeding. It is concluded that major advances in our understanding of the prothrombotic state in DM have been made. Evidence from controlled clinical trials supports the use of enteric-coated aspirin, 81–325 mg/day, as a primary and a secondary prevention strategy in adults with DM with high vascular risk. In ACS, combination therapy with aspirin plus clopidogrel or alternatively, aspirin plus a platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor is supported by prospective trial data. These approaches should be added to the other multifactorial preventive strategies directed at lowering the risk for major vascular events in patients with DM.     

Antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention in stroke � making the right choice

In 2004, approximately 9 million people worldwide experienced a stroke, with the majority being ischemic in nature. While the prognosis for recovery can be good, long-term survival and functional outcome can be improved. Stroke survivors are at an increased risk for recurrent stroke and other ischemic vascular events and face significant cross-risk for atherothrombotic conditions affecting the coronary and peripheral vascular beds. As such, the secondary prevention of ischemic events in patients with stroke has focused on the treatment of atherosclerosis as a whole, with antiplatelet therapy playing a key role. There is some controversy regarding optimal antiplatelet therapy following stroke. The appropriate use of specific agents, the impact of stroke type and proper dosing, and other questions stem from an incomplete understanding of the issues, variability in clinical trial data, diversity in patient demographics, and differences in antiplatelet regimens. This review evaluates the clinical evidence for antiplatelet therapy in patients that have suffered an ischemic stroke, with an emphasis on balancing the benefits of a particular antiplatelet regimen with its attendant risk profile. The critical assessment of emerging trial data and its impact on existing treatment guidelines may aid in choosing the most appropriate antiplatelet regimen for comprehensive secondary prevention following stroke.     

Clopidogrel hydrogen sulphate for atrial fibrillation

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation is a common cardiac rhythm abnormality with a considerable cardiovascular disease burden worldwide. It is an independent major risk factor for stroke. Stroke prevention with anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents has been an important area of clinical research. Warfarin is the most widely used antithrombotic therapy for stroke prophylaxis for last several years, and now dabigatran (150 mg b.i.d.) is more effective than warfarin in stroke prevention in individuals at increased of stroke. In addition, several studies have evaluated the efficacy of clopidogrel for stroke prophylaxis either alone or in combination with aspirin.

Areas covered: This review summarizes the key findings of the trials looking at the efficacy of clopidogrel in stroke prevention. A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. The trials that evaluated the efficacy of clopidogrel in preventing atherothrombotic events or stroke were also included.

Expert opinion: Clopidogrel prevents more vascular events, including stroke, in patients with a recent myocardial infarction, stroke or peripheral vascular disease than aspirin. Combination of clopidogrel and aspirin provides a greater reduction of stroke than aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy, but at an increased risk of bleeding. Dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel and aspirin) is inferior to warfarin in primary stroke prevention for patient with atrial fibrillation and thus should be considered for stroke prophylaxis only in patients ineligible for warfarin. However, with the advent of newer agents, like direct thrombin inhibitors and Factor Xa inhibitors, the role of antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation remains unclear.     

P2Y12 receptor antagonists in acute coronary syndrome: clinical implications of pharmacologic and pharmacogenetic differences

Platelet activation and aggregation are key events in the pathophysiological process of thrombosis, and vascular occlusions. Antiplatelet therapy has proven to be crucial for managing patients with acute coronary syndromes, coronary artery disease and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. However, residual platelet reactivity on antiplatelet treatment confers a five-fold increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events which indicates a need for more effective antiplatelet medications to address the substantial burden of cardiovascular disease. This article reviews the P2Y(12) receptor antagonists with regards to pharmacologic and pharmacogenetic differences and their clinical implications along with the discussion of recent patents.     

Pharmacodynamic properties of antiplatelet agents: current knowledge and future perspectives

Platelets play an important role in atherothrombotic disease. The currently available antiplatelet drugs target key steps of platelet activation including thromboxane A₂ synthesis, ADP-mediated signaling, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-mediated platelet aggregation. The improvement of our understanding on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of these drugs enables the tailoring of the most appropriate anti-thrombotic therapy to the individual patient and risk situation in the daily clinical practice. However, current antiplatelet therapies are associated with increased bleeding risk. Thus, further research on platelet functions may give rise to numerous new antiplatelet agents with high anti-thrombotic efficiency and low adverse hemorrhagic side effects.     

The pharmacogenetics of antiplatelet drugs

Platelets play a pivotal role in coronary heart disease and atherothrombotic events, and thus antiplatelet therapy is commonly used to treat cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, the benefits of this approach are limited, and a large proportion of treated patients will suffer a new thrombotic event, either within the first few weeks following stent implantation or in the follow-up period after myocardial infarction. This lack of clinical benefit may be related to a heterogeneous response to antiplatelet drugs among individuals. Recently, the field of pharmacogenetics has tried to identify gene variants in order to explain tile observed heterogeneity in patient responses to drugs. This review explores the genetic influences on antiplatelet drug efficacy by analyzing the modulating role of different genetic polymorphisms on individual responses to antiplatelet therapy.     

Antiplatelet drug resistance: not ready for prime time

Antiplatelet drug therapy reduces vascular events in a wide range of patients. Although antiplatelet drug resistance is becoming well documented, a universal definition has not been established. This lack and the lack of standardized measures of platelet function make estimation of the prevalence of antiplatelet drug resistance difficult. Mounting evidence suggests that antiplatelet drug resistance is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, which have been assessed in patients with coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease. Patients with antiplatelet drug resistance have significantly more vascular events than patients without such resistance. However, there are no guidelines for the treatment of antiplatelet drug resistance. Although point-of-care platelet-function testing makes screening for resistance feasible, routine screening should not be standard practice until data regarding the management of antiplatelet drug resistance are available.     

Dual antiplatelet therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic events.

The advantages of dual antiplatelet therapy over monotherapy in preventing recurrent ischemic events are examined. Atherosclerosis is an insidious systemic process involving multiple vascular beds, including the cerebral, coronary, and peripheral arteries. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture is one of the inciting events in the progression of platelet activation, aggregation, and thrombus formation. Patients with any clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis are vulnerable to others in different vascular beds since the disease develops throughout the vasculature, and different vascular events have common predisposing risk factors. Ischemic coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease are two of the three most frequent causes of death in the United States. The efficacy of aspirin in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke has been demonstrated in numerous trials. While dipyridamole has not been linked with a greater odds reduction than aspirin in the development of MI, stroke, and vascular death, ticlopidine and clopidogrel have been associated with a greater reduction in the development of acute MI, stroke, and vascular death than aspirin. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic events are ongoing. The rationale for using a combination of two mechanistically different antiplatelet agents is supported by ex vivo and clinical studies. Inhibition of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation is enhanced with dual antiplatelet therapy. Combination antiplatelet regimens with different mechanisms of action to inhibit multiple sites in the thrombotic pathway may further improve long-term clinical outcomes. Dual antiplatelet therapy may have advantages over monotherapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic events.     

Is there a role for oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with peripheral arterial disease?

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an index of systemic atherosclerotic disease and is associated with a high incidence of atherothrombotic complications in coronary, cerebral and peripheral arteries. While antiplatelet agents have been extensively evaluated and shown to be effective in reducing the risk of ischemic vascular complications in PAD, few randomised controlled trials have compared the effects of antiplatelet agents with oral anticoagulants in PAD. Oral anticoagulants have been shown to be superior to aspirin only for the prevention of infrainguinal bypass occlusion of venous grafts in case the bypass is at high risk for occlusion. The effectiveness of oral anticoagulants in reducing vascular morbidity and mortality is still uncertain. However, the reduction of ischemic events by oral anticoagulants is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. As a result, oral anticoagulants have a limited role in patients with symptomatic PAD.     

Heterogeneity of Efficacy and Safety of Antiplatelet Therapy in Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease

The beneficial effects of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention in patients with prior cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, including stroke, transient ischemic attack, and myocardial infarction, have been demonstrated repeatedly over the past decade. It is increasingly apparent that pathophysiologic differences between patients with different types of prior vascular events have an important effect on treatment outcomes. Several large, important trials of antiplatelet therapies, including MATCH, CHARISMA, ESPRIT, and TRITON-TIMI 38, underscore the heterogeneity of the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet agents in patients with recent cerebrovascular disease, compared with patients with recent acute coronary syndromes. Trial data therefore support an individualized approach to antithrombotic therapy for secondary vascular-event prevention that is appropriate for any probable future vascular events and actively reduces the impact of modifiable risk factors common to all vascular events. The potential for benefit in reducing recurrent vascular events must be weighed against the increased risk of bleeding and of patient non-responsiveness to treatment. A number of other factors also need to be considered, including drug interactions, patient compliance, and adverse-effect profiles. Overall, there is now a substantial body of clinical trial evidence that supports the need to carefully individualize antiplatelet therapy and other risk-reducing strategies on the basis of each patient’s pathology and specific needs.     

Monitoring of the antiplatelet drugs effect in patients with coronary artery disease: what is the real clinical impact?

Antiplatelet therapy is used to reduce the risk of ischemic events in patients with cardiovascular disease. The balance of benefits and risks of antiplatelet drugs in coronary artery disease has been evaluated in large-scale randomised trials, however the absolute benefit for an individual patient and a specific platelet-active drug need further evaluation. Several well-conducted studies have demonstrated a substantial inter-individual variability in the platelet responsiveness to drugs. The historical "gold standard" test of platelet function (optical aggregation) has well established limitations for measuring the effect of antiplatelet drugs. Other new tests developed (i.e. PFA-100, VerifyNow) may overcome some of these limitations but they do not correlate well with each other. Despite these unresolved methodological questions, several recent clinical studies, but not all, suggest a significant correlation between antiplatelet resistance status and serious vascular events. In these conditions, laboratory monitoring for antiplatelet therapies raises several questions: (i) the necessity for a consensus on the definition of resistance and on the best test for evaluation of the condition, (ii) the demonstration that biological resistance has clinical significance, and (iii) the clinical impact of adapting the antiplatelet therapy. Therefore, it is not currently appropriate to test patients or to change therapy on the basis of such tests, other than in prospective and adequately powered clinical trials.     

Monitoring antiplatelet therapy: What is the best method?

Platelet function tests measure different aspects of platelet function, which include adherence, activation, aggregation and secretion. Clinically, the goal of platelet function testing is to provide information about the platelet contribution to the risk of thrombotic or haemorrhagic events and the optimisation of antiplatelet therapy. The important clinical questions are whether an antiplatelet agent is having the desired effect on platelet inhibition (effectiveness) and whether the patient has sufficient residual platelet function to avoid bleeding (safety). The role of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and thienopyridines is well established in the management of patients with coronary artery disease and in the setting of coronary interventions. The last several years have demonstrated the unequivocal effectiveness of intravenously administered platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists in the management of acute coronary syndromes and in the setting of percutaneous coronary interventions. With the increasing use of these GPIIb/IIIa antagonists, it is becoming more important clinically to measure platelet inhibition with these agents. This paper reviews major techniques and instrumentation for platelet monitoring and discusses the goals of the best method.     

Novel Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes: What is New in the Pipeline?

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are triggered by enhanced platelet activation and aggregation. Hence, a cornerstone of successful secondary prevention in ACS is an effective platelet inhibition. Additionally, coronary interventions (PCI) lead to even increased artherothrombotic risks, another challenge in preventing recurrent events including stent thrombosis. Promising platelet targets were characterized and novel molecules were developed that are currently under investigation. Intensified antiplatelet therapy includes the risk of major bleeding which itself increases the mortality rate. Previous strategies of antiplatelet therapy were based on an "one-size fits all" concept. However, there has been evidence that variability of drug response exists and represents a clinically relevant issue. This observation is in line with results of randomized clinical trials that standard-of-care antiplatelet therapy is not sufficient to reduce cardiovascular (CV) risk in certain subgroups of ACS patients. In the last years, novel antiplatelet substances have entered the clinical arena and others are currently under investigation in phase II and III clinical trials. These include 3rd generation thienopyridine (prasugrel, elinogrel), ATP analogs (Ticagrelor, cangrelor), and non-ADP-receptor blocking antiplatelet substances like thrombin receptor antagonists. These agents have shown promising results in pilot studies and recent randomized trials. As the prevention of atherothrombotic risk is at the expense of bleeding risk, it will be a future task to clearly define patients' groups and subsets of ACS for the best net clinical benefit. This article focuses on the role of novel antiplatelet substances to reduce CV risk in ACS, discuss clinical implications and their potential future role.