Interaction of the discriminative stimulus properties of diazepam and ethanol in pigeons

One group of pigeons (n = 5) was trained to discriminate between the effects induced by 5.6 mg/kg of diazepam (DZP) and the vehicle whereas other pigeons (n = 5) had to discriminate between 3.0 g/kg of ethanol (ETOH) and the vehicle, administered intragastrically (IG) 10 and 40 min prior to the training sessions respectively. Once trained, the pigeons were tested with either diazepam or ethanol alone and in combination. The birds trained to discriminate between DZP and the vehicle mostly performed non-drug associated responses when tested with ETOH (0.56 to 3.0 g/kg). Tests with other doses of DZP (0.3 to 3.0 mg/kg) in the diazepam-trained birds resulted in an ED50 value of 1.4 mg/kg. The birds trained to discriminate between ETOH and the vehicle generalized DZP to ETOH, the ED50 value for diazepam being 3.0 mg/kg. Tests with other doses of ETOH (0.56 to 2.0 g/kg) in this latter group resulted in an ED50 value of 1.3 g/kg. Tests with combinations of DZP and ETOH produced a shift of the dose-response curves to the left indicating drug additivity. The discrimination of 5.6 mg/kg of IG administered DZP but not that of ETOH (3.0 g/kg) was attenuated by injections of the analeptic bemegride (ED50 = 5.5 mg/kg), thus suggesting a difference in the cueing processes of the two drugs. When tested singly, bemegride induced non-drug responding or complete suppression of responding in the birds at the doses of 3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg respectively. In conclusion, the discriminable effects of DZP and ETOH are additive or even supra-additive, but the stimulus properties of the two drugs are not identical.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of the optical isomers of nicotine

Rats were trained to discriminate 200 or 400 g/kg (-)nicotine from saline in a two-bar operant paradigm. Dose-response relationships for optically pure (-)- and (+)nicotine as well as antagonistic effects were examined in both groups of rats. The natural isomer (-)nicotine was approximately nine-times more potent than (+)nicotine. Mecamylamine produced equal blockade of the (-)- and (+)nicotine cues. Hexamethonium and atropine were without effect. These data demonstrate the possible stereospecificity of the central nicotinic receptor that mediates the stimulus effect produced by nicotine.     

The discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in pigeons

This experiment was designed to elucidate the neurotransmitter systems that mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine. Four pigeons were trained to peck one key following saline injections and a second key following methamphetamine injections (1.0 or 1.7 mg/kg, IM). Substitution tests revealed drug-appropriate responding following administration of the psychomotor stimulants methamphetamine, amphetamine and cocaine, the dopamine (DA) reuptake inhibitor bupropion, norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitors imipramine and tomoxetine, and the serotonin (5-HT) releaser fenfluramine. Salinekey responding occurred following administration of the D₁ agonist SKF-38393, the D₁ antagonist SCH-23390, the α₂ receptor agonist clonidine, the α₁ antagonist prazosin, a nonselective β-antagonist propranolol and the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine. The D₂/D₃ agonist quinpirole produced drug-appropriate responding in two pigeons and partial substitution in the remaining two pigeons. The 5HT_1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT produced drug-appropriate responding at higher doses (0.3–1.0 mg/kg), whereas much lower doses (0.003–0.1 mg/kg) antagonized the methamphetamine stimulus. The stimulus effects of methamphetamine were attenuated by pretreatment with prazosin, SCH-23390 and eticlopride, whereas pretreatment with propranolol and the 5-HT₃ antagonist, MDL 72222, failed reliably to attenuate drug key responding. These results suggest that NE and DA reuptake inhibition and 5-HT release mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine as do the 5-HT_1A and DA D₁ and D₂ receptors.     

Generalization of the discriminative stimulus properties of phencyclidine to other drugs in the pigeon using color tracking under second order schedules

Pigeons were trained to track the location of a red or green key color under a second order schedule, with reinforcement of responses to each color contingent upon whether 1.5 mg/kg phencyclidine (PCP) or saline had been administered before the session. When cumulative dose-effect curves were determined for other drugs substituted for PCP, pigeons responded predominantly on the PCP key after other doses of PCP, ketamine, pentobarbital, d-cyclazocine and l-cyclazocine, but not after saline, lactic acid solution, d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide, scopolamine, morphine, naltrexone, or d-, or l-methadone. l-Cyclazocine was slightly more potent than d-cyclazocine in producing PCP key responding. PCP key responding after the optical isomers of cyclazocine was not blocked by naltrexone.     

Selective blockade of the discriminative stimulus effects of pentobarbital in pigeons

The ability of CNS stimulants to block the discriminative effects of pentobarbital was studied in pigeons trained to discriminate IM pentobarbital (5 mg/kg) from saline. Pentobarbital, when administered alone, consistently produced greater than 90% pentobarbital-appropriate responding. The concomitant administration of pentobarbital and increasing doses of bemegride or pentylenetetrazol resulted in a dose-related decrease in pentobarbital-appropriate responses. In contrast, picrotoxin, another CNS stimulant, had little or no effect on pentobarbital-appropriate responding produced by pentobarbital.     

The discriminative stimulus properties of the R2 isomer of viminol

Viminol is a pyrrylethanolamine derivative which exists naturally as a racemic mixture containing six different stereoisomers. Viminol has been reported to exert both potent analgesic activity and minimal dependence liability. The analgesic component of racemic viminol has been attributed to the R2 isomer, while the antagonistic S2 isomer appears to be responsible for minimizing the dependence liability of the racemate. We tested the R2 isomer of viminol in rats trained to discriminate 3 mg/kg morphine sulfate from saline on a VI-15 sec schedule for sweetened milk reinforcement. The R2 isomer resulted in dose dependent morphine-like responding, with complete generalization to the 2.5 mg/kg dose of R2 viminol. The morphine-like discriminative stimulus properties of R2 viminol were reversed by naloxone in a dose-dependent fashion, with total blockade by 0.1 mg/kg naloxone. R2 viminol, like morphine, also had a biphasic effect on response rate with low doses increasing and high doses suppressing response rates. R2 viminol had a overall shorter time course than that reported for morphine, and its different physiological and behavioral effects may not occur simultaneously. These data suggest that R2 viminol exerts a subjective effect similar to that of morphine and supports the hypothesis that R2 viminol has opiate activity despite its lack of structural relationship to the opiate series.     

The discriminative stimulus properties of zolpidem,a novel imidazopyridine hypnotic

Zolpidem is a non-benzodiazepine hypnotic drug which displaces benzodiazepines from their binding sites in different brain structures. Previous work has demonstrated several differences between zolpidem and benzodiazepines, including differences between the stimulus properties of zolpidem and chlordiazepoxide. In the present study the discriminative stimulus properties of zolpidem were analysed by training rats to discriminate between this drug and saline. It was found that stimulus control developed readily with 2 mg/kg but not with 1 mg/kg zolpidem. The effect was dose-related, had a short duration of action and was antagonised by Ro 15-1788. Furthermore, stimulus control produced by zolpidem was associated with marked reductions in rates of responding. Injections of chlordiazepoxide, triazolam, lorazepam, zopiclone, CL 218,872 and pentobarbital produced dose-related responding on the zolpidem-associated lever but haloperidol did not. However, in general, the doses of those drugs which produced drug-lever responding also reduced response rates. It is possible that the above mentioned differences between the discriminative stimulus produced by zolpidem in rats and those produced by other sedatives may be due to a selective action of zolpidem on a sub-type of benzodiazepine binding site. Offprint requests to: D.J. Sanger     

Nisoxetine and amphetamine share discriminative stimulus properties in mice

The interaction of amphetamine with noradrenergic neurons could mediate a portion of the drug's discriminative stimulus properties. To test this hypothesis, mice were trained to discriminate 1.0 or 3.2 mg/kg amphetamine, 32 mg/kg of the selective norepinephrine uptake inhibitor, nisoxetine, or 32 mg/kg nisoxetine + 1.0 mg/kg amphetamine from saline. Differential drug- or saline-appropriate responding was determined using a two photocell-beam procedure with beam interruption as the operant. Reinforcement (5-sec access to evaporated milk) was presented on a fixed-ratio 20 (FR-20) schedule. Mice trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg amphetamine from saline generalized to nisoxetine (32 mg/kg) alone and to doses of 0.56 mg/kg amphetamine and above but not to lower doses unless pretreated with nisoxetine (20 or 32 mg/kg). Mice trained to discriminate nisoxetine (32 mg/kg) from saline generalized to 0.56, 1.0 and 3.2 mg/kg amphetamine and generalized to all amphetamine doses when pretreated with nisoxetine (32 mg/kg). Mice trained to discriminate the drug combination from saline generalized to nisoxetine (32 mg/kg) alone, and to 3.2 mg/kg amphetamine tested alone, to 0.56 mg/kg of amphetamine or above when the lower dose of nisoxetine (20 mg/kg) was used, and to all test doses of amphetamine with nisoxetine (32 mg/kg) pretreatment. Mice trained to discriminate 3.2 mg/kg amphetamine from saline generalized to no test dose of amphetamine following either saline or nisoxetine (32 mg/kg) pretreatment. Testing with several doses of pentobarbital (1.0, 3.0, 10.0 and 18.0 mg/kg) resulted in saline-appropriate responding regardless of training group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Discriminative stimulus effects of pentobarbital in pigeons

Pigeons were trained to discriminate the IM injection of pentobarbital (5 or 10 mg/kg) from saline in a task in which 20 consecutive pecks on one of two response keys produced access to mixed grain. Pentobarbital (1.0–17.8 mg/kg) produced a dose-related increase in the percentage of the total session responses that occurred on the pentobarbital-appropriate key. The concomitant administration of bemegride (5.6–17.8 mg/kg) antagonized the discriminative control of behavior exerted by the training dose of pentobarbital. Benzodiazepines, diazepam (1.0 mg/kg) and clobazam (3.2 mg/kg), and barbiturates, methohexital (10 mg/kg), phenobarbital (56 mg/kg), and barbital (56 mg/kg), produced responding on the pentobarbital-appropriate key similar to that produced by pentobarbital. In contrast, narcotics such as morphine, ethylketazocine, cyclazocine, and SKF-10,047, at doses up to and including those that markedly suppressed response rates, produced responding predominantly on the saline-appropriate key. Similarly, the anticonvulsants, valproate, phenytoin, and ethosuximide occasioned only saline-appropriate behavior, indicating that not all anticonvulsants share discriminative stimulus effects with pentobarbital. Muscimol, a direct GABA agonist, and baclofen, a structural analogue of GABA, also failed to produce pentobarbital-appropriate responding. Ketamine, dextrorphan, and ethanol (0.3–3.2 g/kg, orally) produced intermediate levels of pentobarbital-appropriate responding, suggesting that the discriminative effects of these drugs may be somewhat like those of pentobarbital.     

Cholinergic mediation of the discriminative stimulus properties of clozapine

Rats were trained to discriminate clozapine (CLZ; 5.76 mg/kg, IPt-30 min) in a two-lever operant task in which responding on the correct lever was reinforced with water under a fixed ratio 32 schedule. The ED₅₀ of CLZ was 1.1 mg/kg. The CLZ cue was generalised to atropine (ED₅₀=8.7 mg/kg), scopolamine (ED₅₀=0.37 mg/kg) and fluperlapine (ED₅₀=4.0 mg/kg), but not to non-cholinergic compounds, i.e. buspirone, diazepam, ketanserin, prazosin or SCH 23390. The peripherally-acting muscarinic antagonist methylscopolamine did not substitute for CLZ. Furthermore, the CLZ cue was marginally attenuated byd-amphetamine; a high dose of oxotremorine (1 mg/kg) appeared to block the CLZ cue (to 22%). However, this effect could not be evaluated statistically due to an insufficient number of animals responding. These results may indicate that the discriminative stimulus effects of CLZ primarily involve antagonism of central muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of ketamine stereoisomers in phencyclidine-trained rats

Rats were trained to discriminate phencyclidine (PCP) from saline in a two-lever drug discrimination task on a fixed-ratio 32 schedule of food presentation. The subjects were given IP injections of 3.0 mg/kg PCP or saline daily on a double alteration schedule. After reliable discriminative control of lever choice was established, dose-response determinations for generalization to the training dose of PCP were made with several doses of PCP, a racemic mixture of ketamine and the pure levo (?) and dextro (+) salts of ketamine. All three forms of ketamine produced dose-dependent PCP-appropriate responding. ED₅₀ values were determined for each drug for percent drug-lever appropriate responding and for suppression of operant responding during test sessions. There was a greater difference between doses which produced drug-lever appropriate responding and doses which suppressed response rates for PCP than for any of the forms of ketamine. (±)- and (+)-ketamine were about 2 times more potent than (?)-ketamine for producing drug-lever appropriate responding but were roughly equipotent for response rate suppression. Thus there is no qualitative and little quantitative stereospecificity for the PCP-like discriminative stimulus effects of ketamine in rats.     

Similarity of the discriminative stimulus effects of ketamine,cyclazocine, and dextrorphan in the pigeon

Separate groups of pigeons were trained to discriminate the IM injection of ketamine, cyclazocine, or dextrorphan from saline. Each of the training drugs and phencyclidine produced dose-related, drug-appropriate responding in each group of birds. In contrast, ethylketazocine and nalorphine generally produced responding appropriate for saline. These results indicate that common elements of discriminable effects exist among ketamine, cyclazocine, and dextrorphan, structurally dissimilar compounds that are generally considered to belong to distinct pharmacological classes.     

Studies on the discriminative stimulus properties of apomorphine in rhesus monkeys

Four rhesus monkeys were trained to discriminate the effect of apomorphine (0.1 mg/kg IM) from that of saline injections. The discriminative stimulus (DS) effect of apomorphine generalized to the dopamine D₂ receptor agonist quinpirole. The D₁ dopamine receptor agonist SKF 38393 elicited responses only on the saline-appropriate lever. Stimulus generalization of the dopamine autoreceptor agonist 3-PPP exhibited stereospecificity favoring the (+) over the (-) isomer. d-Amphetamine, phencyclidine, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), and clonidine did not share the DS effect of apomorphine. The D₂-selective antagonists sulpiride and metoclopramide reversed both the DS effect and the response rate reduction produced by the training dose of apomorphine. Chlorpromazine and the D₁ antagonist Sch 23390 also antagonized the DS effect, but the antagonism was accompanied by a further rate reduction. Haloperidol and clozapine antagonized the DS effect incompletely. The DS effect produced by apomorphine in this study appears to be mediated predominantly by post-synaptic D₂ receptor activation, with contribution also from the D₁ receptor.     

Environmental modification of tolerance to morphine discriminative stimulus properties in rats

The development of tolerance to the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine was examined in rats trained to discriminate saline and 3.2 mg/kg morphine under amultiple timeout 15 min, 5 min fixed-ratio 30 schedule of food delivery. Generalization gradients were generated by administering increasing doses of morphine before successive timeout periods within the experimental session. Over the course of the study, the minimal discriminable dose (MDD) of morphine under control conditions fluctuated but did not systematically increase or decrease. Acute pretreatments of 3.2–17.8 mg/kg morphine 4–24 h before a generalization test resulted in minor changes in the MDD. To examine development of tolerance, supplemental doses of morphine (17.8 mg/kg) or saline were administered twice daily while discrimination training was either suspended or continued. Tolerance was assessed by weekly generalization tests. Greater tolerance developed to the morphine stimulus when training was suspended than when training was continued. For both training conditions, response rates during generalization tests were markedly suppressed during supplemental morphine administration, and original generalization gradients were recaptured within 2 weeks after termination of supplemental morphine administration. Supplemental saline administration did not alter the discriminative or rate-altering effects of morphine under either training condition. Thus, the magnitude of tolerance to a morphine discriminative stimulus reflected an interaction of supplemental drug treatment with the training conditions imposed during that treatment.     

The effects of opiate antagonists on the discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol

The effects of naloxone HCl (1.0 mg/kg, 10.0 mg/kg) and naltrexone HCl (1.0 mg/kg, 10.0 mg/kg) on the discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol were measured in order to assess the role of opiate pathways in that behavioral property of ethanol. Forty-eight Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to perform ethanol: saline discriminations on a DRL 10″ schedule of reinforcement in a double lever operant paradigm. Discrimination training for 170 days established 0.6 mg/kg IP ethanol doses as a discriminative stimulus producing at least 80% of all responses as drug appropriate lever choices during 10 min test sessions. After that performance criterion was achieved the effects of the opiate antagonists on the discrimination were assessed by administering naloxone (1.0 mg/kg, IM, 10.0 mg/kg IM) or naltrexone (1.0 mg/kg, IM, 10.0 mg/kg, IM) 15–30 min before the ethanol test dose. Neither antagonist produced significant changes in the performance of the ethanol-saline discrimination. These data demonstrate that the discriminative stimulus properties of ethanol do not require intact opiate pathways. That result implies that the neuropharmacological mechanisms mediating ethanol's stimulus properties in rodents are different from the mechanisms mediating many other behavioral actions of ethanol, including its reinforcing properties.     

The discriminative stimulus effects of tripelennamine in humans

Twenty volunteers were trained to discriminate between 75 mg tripelennamine (TP) and placebo. During the first four sessions, the drugs were identified prior to ingestion by letter code. During the next six sessions, the procedure was the same except the capsules were not identified. At the end of the 3-h session, participants indicated which capsule they believed they received using the letter codes. When correct, they received a monetary bonus. If they were correct on five sessions, they entered the third phase which had ten additional training and 12 test sessions. During tests, participants received capsules that contained other drugs, including diphenhydramine (50 and 75 mg), chlorpheniramine (4 and 6 mg), diazepam (5 and 10 mg),d-amphetamine (5 and 10 mg), as well as tripelennamine (25, 50 and 75 mg) and placebo. Thirteen participants learned the discrimination and nine entered the third phase. Except for placebo, most participants identified the test compounds as TP and labeled them as sedatives. TP produced significant changes on several subjective and physiological measures. The test compounds produced varied effects which were neither clearly dose-related nor related to the identification as TP or placebo. These results indicate that tripelennamine can function as a discriminative stimulus, but with little evidence of pharmacological specificity.The opinions expressed by the authors are not necessarily those of the United States Government. Portions of the data were presented as a poster at the 1993 annual meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence, which was published as an abstract (Evans S, Henningfield J, Johanson CE (1994) Discriminative stimulus effects of tripelennamine in humans. In Problems of Drug Dependence 1993: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Scientific Meeting. Harris LS (ed) National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series 141:396)     

The effects of perinatal exposure to lead on the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine and related drugs in rats

RATIONALE: Developmental lead exposure may alter responsiveness to cocaine well into adulthood, and ultimately influence drug-use patterns. OBJECTIVES: The present study examined the effect of perinatal lead exposure on the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine. METHODS: Female rats were treated with 0, 8, or 16 mg lead daily for 30 days before breeding with untreated males. This exposure regimen continued through gestation and until postnatal day (PND) 21, i.e., weaning. At PND 60 male pups were trained to discriminate between saline and cocaine (5 mg/kg) injections. After acquisition, a series of generalization/substitution tests were performed using a cumulative dosing procedure. RESULTS: Developmental lead exposure produced subsensitivity to SKF-82958 (D1-like dopamine receptor agonist), quinpirole (D2-like dopamine receptor agonist), and apomorphine (mixed D1-like/D2-like dopamine receptor agonist); but no differences were evident among lead-treatment groups on generalization/substitution tests with cocaine, d-amphetamine, or GBR-12909. Furthermore, when the kappa-opioid receptor agonist U69,593 was administered prior to cocaine (5 mg/kg), generalization to the cocaine stimulus decreased in control rats, but generalization in lead-exposed rats was not altered. Group differences were not evident in tolerance or recovery of tolerance to cocaine following repeated cocaine administration (60 mg/kg per day for 14 days). Furthermore, no differences were found across groups in concentrations of lead in brain, although pups exposed to 16 mg lead had slightly elevated blood lead concentrations (<7 microg/dl). CONCLUSIONS: These results further a growing research literature that suggests developmental lead exposure can produce long-lasting changes in drug responsiveness, even after exposure to the toxicant has been discontinued.     

The discriminative stimulus properties of self-administered ethanol are mediated by GABAA and NMDA receptors in rats

RATIONALE: The neurobiological systems that mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of self-administered drugs are largely unknown. The present study examined the discriminative stimulus effects of self-administered ethanol. METHODS: Rats were trained to discriminate ethanol (1 g/kg, IP) from saline on a two-lever drug discrimination task with sucrose (10% w/v) reinforcement. Test sessions were conducted with ethanol (0 or 10% v/v) added to the sucrose reinforcement to determine if self-administered ethanol would interact with the discriminative stimulus effects of investigator-administered ethanol, or with the ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects of the GABAA-positive modulator pentobarbital or the non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK-801. RESULTS: During a saline test session, ethanol (10% v/v) was added to the sucrose reinforcement. Responding by all animals began accurately on the saline-appropriate lever and then switched to the ethanol-appropriate lever after rats self-administered a mean dose of 1.2 +/- 0.14 g/kg ethanol. During cumulative self-administration trials, responding initially occurred on the saline lever and then switched to the ethanol-appropriate lever after ethanol (0.68 +/- 0.13 g/kg) was self-administered. Investigator-administered MK-801 (0.01-1.0 mg/kg, cumulative IP) and pentobarbital (0.3-10.0 mg/kg, cumulative IP) dose-dependently substituted for ethanol. When ethanol (10% v/v) was added to the sucrose reinforcer, MK-801 and pentobarbital dose-response curves were shifted significantly to the left. CONCLUSIONS: Self-administered ethanol substituted for and potentiated the stimulus effects of investigator-administered ethanol, suggesting that the discriminative stimulus effects of self-administered ethanol are similar to those produced by investigator-administered ethanol. Self-administered ethanol enhanced the ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects of MK-801 and pentobarbital, which suggests that the discriminative stimulus effects of self-administered ethanol are mediated by NMDA and GABAA receptors.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of melatonin in the rat

To provide initial information on the potential mechanisms underlying the discriminative stimulus effects of melatonin, rats were trained to discriminate melatonin (150 mg/kg, IP) from saline in a two-choice discrete-trial avoidance paradigm. Stimulus generalization curves for melatonin were steep; complete generalization with melatonin occurred at 100–150 mg/kg. Triazolam generalized completely with melatonin (n=7). Flurazepam generalized completely with melatonin in only two out of six rats; however, partial generalization was produced in the remaining four animals. The melatonin-appropriate responding produced by triazolam was antagonized completely (in six out of seven rats) by 0.3–10 mg/kg flumazenil (Ro 15–1788). In contrast, the dose of flumazenil sufficient to block completely the melatonin-like discriminative effects of triazolam failed to block the stimulus effects of the training dose of melatonin. Pentobarbital produced primarily melatonin-appropriate responding, with complete generalization with melatonin in five out of seven rats. Diphenhydramine generalized completely with melatonin in two out of seven rats; however, little or no partial generalization was observed in the remaining five rats. These results suggest that melatonin may produce its discriminative effects through sites on the GABA_A-benzodiazepine receptor complex distinct from the benzodiazepine binding sites.     

Role of serotonin in the discriminative stimulus properties of mescaline

Rats were trained to discriminate intraperitoneally administered mescaline from saline in a two-lever operant chamber for food reinforcement. Reward was contingent upon responses made greater than 15 sec apart (DRL-15) on the appropriate lever paired with either drug or saline administration. Following the establishment of discriminative response control by mescaline, the animals were tested for stimulus generalization produced by mescaline after: (a) blockade of peripheral and central serotonin (5-HT) receptors with cinanserin, methysergide, or cyproheptadine; (b) blockade of peripheral 5-HT receptors with xylamidine tosylate; and (c) depletion of brain 5-HT with the tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor p-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA). The results show that all three central 5-HT antagonists greatly reduced the discriminability of mescaline while the peripheral antagonist, xylamidine tosylate, was without effect. Furthermore, these agents at the doses employed did not affect the discriminability of saline. Depletion of 5-HT with PCPA potentiated the effects of a sub-threshold dose of mescaline and slightly reduced the discriminability of saline. The results indicate that mescaline produces its discriminative stimulus properties by directly stimulating central serotonergic receptors.