动态轮廓眼压计的临床应用

目的 探讨动态轮廓眼压计(OCT)在原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)、高眼压症(OHT)、正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)及正常对照人群眼压和眼压脉动振幅(OPA)测量中的临床应用价值及影响因素.方法 选取POAG、OHT、NTG及正常对照组各30例,分别采用Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)测量眼压,DCT测量眼压及OPA,并测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)、中央角膜曲率(CCV)以及心率、收缩压、舒张压等指标,以了解这些指标对OPA的影响.各组统计量两两比较采用q检验.各统计量之间的相关分析采用Pearson相关分析,对于多个变量之间的线性关系采用多重线性回归分析.结果 DCT测量POAG、OHT、NTG及对照组的眼压值分别为(21.68±2.02)、(23.37±2.65)、(18.43±3.08)、(17.04±2.07)lnln Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa);GAT测最的眼压值分别为(21.18±2.95)、(23.28±5.95)、(16.39±3.60)、(14.66±2.27)mm Hg.两者测量结果的差异无统计学意义(t=1.338,1.445,1.682,1.803;P=0.197,0.151,0.136,0.081).POAG、OHT、NTG及对照组的OPA值分别为3.03±1.13,3.53±1.43,2.21±0.55,2.87±0.60,组间比较差异有统计学意义(F=21.311,P=0.000);OPA值与心率、收缩压、舒张压、GAT测量值、CCT均相关,与年龄无明显相关性.结论 DCT测量结果与GAT有良好的一致性,受干扰因素少,可信度高;POAG、NTG、OHT患者和正常人的OPA存在差异,其中NCT患者OPA值明显较低,提示各组间眼内血液动力学状况的差异,OPA可能对青光眼的诊断及治疗具有一定的潜在价值.     

Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the hysteresis and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in normal tension glaucoma (NTG), primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) eyes measured by the ocular response analyser (ORA). Methods: This is a prospective, cross‐sectional and comparative clinical trial. The setting was a teaching hospital in Birmingham, England. Patients: 216 eyes with POAG, 68 eyes with NTG and 199 eyes with OHT. Observational procedures: Goldmann applanation tonometry and intraocular pressure (IOP), hysteresis and CRF measured by ORA and central corneal thickness (CCT) by ultrasonic pachymetery. The main outcome measures were IOP, CCT, hysteresis and CRF. Results: The hysteresis in NTG, POAG and OHT eyes was 9.0 ± 1.9, 9.9 ± 2.1 and 10.2 ± 2.0 mmHg; CRF was 9.1 ± 2.2, 10.6 ± 2.0 and 12.0 ± 2.0 mmHg; IOP by Goldmann applanation tonometry and ORA was 14.7 ± 2.8 and 15.3 ± 4.2 mmHg, 16.7 ± 4.0 and 16.9 ± 4.6 mmHg and 20.5 ± 4.1 and 20.0 ± 4.5 mmHg; CCT was 526.5 ± 42.2, 537.0 ± 36.0 and 563.4 ± 35.9 µm, respectively. The difference for CRF, IOP and CCT for NTG, POAG and OHT eyes was statistically significant. Conclusion: Hysteresis and CRF were highest in OHT eyes. These factors may prove to be useful measurements of ocular rigidity and may help to understand role of the corneal rigidity in monitoring the progress of conditions such as NTG, POAG and OHT.     

动态轮廓眼压计在正常眼压性青光眼及原发性开角型青光眼的应用研究

目的:应用动态轮廓眼压计(dynamic contour tonometer,DCT)测量正常眼压性青光眼(normal tension glaucoma,NTG)及原发性开角型青光眼(primary open angle glaucoma,POAG)患者的眼压(intraocular pressure,IOP)及眼脉动幅度值(ocular pulse amplitude,OPA),并探讨影响OPA测量值的相关因素。方法:选取NTG患者20例,POAG患者21例及正常对照组各20例,应用Goldmann压平眼压(Goldmann applanation tonometer,GAT)及DCT测量IOP,同时测量了中央角膜厚度(central corneal thickness,CCT)、眼轴(axial length,AL)、心率(heart rate,HR)、收缩压(systolic blood pressure,SBP)、舒张压(diastolic blood pressure,DBP)等指标,并探讨GAT,DCT两种眼压计测量的相关性,进而分析OPA测量值的影响因素。结果:三组被检者的IOP,OPA,SBP及DBP差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),而CCT,AL及HR差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。其中OPA值NTG组为(1.7±0.9)mmHg,POAG组为(2.8±0.7)mmHg,正常对照组为(2.4±0.6)mmHg;NTG组与POAG组比较(P=0.001),与正常对照组比较(P=0.005)差异均有统计学意义,POAG组与正常对照组比较(P=0.502)差异无统计学意义;OPA值与IOP,HR及CCT无相关性(P>0.05),与AL,SBP及DBP具有一定的相关性(P<0.05)。结论:NTG患者与POAG患者及正常人的OPA值存在差异,同时OPA值受AL及SBP及DBP影响。     

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice

Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) readings taken using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) with IOP readings taken with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Methods: The present study included 100 eyes in 100 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. After pachymetry DCT and GAT were performed. Intraocular pressures as measured with DCT and GAT were compared with one another and with central corneal thickness (CCT). Results: Mean DCT IOP measurements (20.1 ± 4.3 mmHg) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than GAT IOP values (17.9 ± 4.7 mmHg). The mean difference between DCT and GAT measurements was 2.1 mmHg (range ? 3.4 to 9.7 mmHg). The difference followed a normal distribution. Measurements made with DCT and GAT correlated significantly with one another (Spearman’s rho = 0.761, p < 0.001). Neither GAT nor DCT measurements showed a significant correlation with CCT (537 ± 39 μm, range 458–656 μm). Multivariate regression analysis has shown that the difference between DCT and GAT is influenced significantly by ocular pulse amplitude (r = ? 0.334, p = 0.001) and it is not influenced by CCT (r = ? 0.106, p = 0.292). Conclusions: In eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, DCT facilitates suitable and reliable IOP measurements which are in good concordance with GAT readings. Variation in CCT cannot by itself explain the differences in measurements taken with DCT and GAT in a number of eyes.     

相干光断层扫描仪检测正常人及青光眼患者中央角膜厚度

目的探讨相干光断层扫描仪(OCT)测量正常人、原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)、正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)、高眼压症(OHT)患者的中央角膜厚度(CCT)。方法采用OCT3测量正常人143例(143只眼)、POAG患者36例(36只眼)、NTG患者39例(39只眼)及OHT患者40例(40只眼)的CCT,并进行单因素4水平设计定量资料的方差分析;用线性回归方法分析正常人CCT与Goldmann压平眼压测量值的相关关系;对OCT测量CCT观察者间和观察者内的一致性进行类内相关系数(ICC)分析。结果正常组、POAG组、NTG组及OHT组的平均CCT值分别为(523.66±32.13)μm、(530.92±27.32)μm、(506.92±21.49)μm及(573.13±27.39)μm。POAG组与正常人组的平均CCT值差异无统计学意义(P=0.099);OHT组的平均CCT值大于其他各组,均P<0.01;NTG组的平均CCT值小于其他各组,均P<0.01。正常组CCT与眼压值呈正相关(r=0.318,R2=0.101,P<0.01)。OCT测量CCT的测量者间和测量者内的ICC值分别为0.995和0.996。结论OCT可以准确地测量CCT;NTG患者平均CCT比正常人薄,而OHT患者比正常人厚;CCT可以影响Goldmann压平眼压计的测量值,但贡献率较小。(中华眼科杂志,2006,42:199-203)     

Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken with Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), the TonoPen and the Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements taken with Pascal DCT and the TonoPen was evaluated. METHODS: One eye in each of 101 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) underwent ultrasonic CCT measurement and IOP evaluation with GAT, Pascal DCT and the TonoPen in random order. The agreement between results from Pascal DCT and the TonoPen and those of GAT was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. The deviation of Pascal DCT and TonoPen readings from GAT values, corrected for CCT, was calculated and correlated to CCT using a linear regression model. RESULTS: The mean of the differences in IOP measurements was 3.2 +/- 2.4 mmHg for Pascal DCT minus GAT readings and 0.5 +/- 4.5 mmHg for TonoPen minus GAT readings. The 95% confidence interval of differences in IOP measurements was higher between TonoPen and GAT readings (- 6 to 7 mmHg) than between Pascal and GAT readings (0.1-6.8 mmHg). Pascal DCT significantly overestimated IOP compared with GAT, especially for higher IOP readings. Bland-Altman scatterplots showed reasonable inter-method agreement between Pascal DCT and GAT measurements, and poor agreement between TonoPen and GAT measurements. The deviations of Pascal DCT and TonoPen readings from the corrected GAT values were both highly correlated with CCT values (linear regression analysis, p < 0.0001). The mean change in measured IOP for a 10-microm increase in CCT was 0.48 mmHg for Pascal DCT and 0.74 mmHg for the TonoPen. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement with GAT measurements was higher for Pascal DCT than for TonoPen readings; however, Pascal DCT significantly overestimated IOP values compared with GAT. Measurements of IOP obtained with both Pascal DCT and the TonoPen appeared to be influenced by CCT, and this influence appeared to be greater for the latter.     

动态轮廓眼压计在正常人群中的应用及其影响因素分析

目的评价动态轮廓眼压计（DCT）与Goldmann压平眼压计（GAT）测量值之间的关系,寻找DCT眼压测量值的影响因素;分析DCT所测眼压脉动振幅（OPA）与DCT眼压值、中央角膜厚度（CCT）、角膜屈光力（CCV）、眼轴长度（AL）、前房深度（ACD）、收缩压（SBP）、舒张压（DBP）和心率（HR）的关系。方法分别测量正常人60例60眼的DCT眼压、GAT眼压、CCT、CCV、AL、ACD以及HR、SBP、DBP等指标,比较GAT、DCT2种眼压计测量的相关性及DCT测量值的影响因素。结果 DCT与GAT所测眼压平均值分别为（16.04±2.57）mmHg和（14.20±2.93）mmHg。DCT眼压值较GAT眼压值高,差异有统计学意义（t=6.454,P〈0.01）。DCT眼压值与GAT眼压值呈正相关（r=0.684,P〈0.01）。DCT眼压值与CCT不相关（r=0.212,P=0.105）,GAT眼压值与CCT呈正相关（r=0.291,P=0.024）。60例正常人的OPA均值为（2.50±0.89）mmHg,OPA与年龄、DCT眼压值、CCT、SBP、DBP、HR均不相关（P〉0.05）,与CCV呈正相关（r=0.343,P=0.007）。结论在正常人群中DCT眼压值与GAT眼压值有较好的相关性,DCT的眼压测量值不受CCT、CCV等因素的影响。DCT眼压值、CCT、SBP、DBP、HR等对OPA无明显影响。     

Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes

BACKGROUND: The PASCAL Dynamic Contour Tonometer (DCT) is a new diagnostic approach for the digital measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with glaucoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of DCT in normal eyes and to compare DCT with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and TonoPenXL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study on 323 normal, consecutive eyes was performed. Eyes with an IOP of more than 23 mmHg (GAT) were excluded. Central corneal power (Zeiss Ophthalmometer) and central corneal thickness (ultrasound pachymetry: Tomey AL-1000) were taken. The IOP readings were obtained as follows: 3 x DCT [quality of measurement, IOP and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) were taken], 1 x TonoPenXL, GAT, finally: once again DCT to evaluate the tonography effect. RESULTS: The quality of 3 following IOP (DCT) readings was good (quality Q1 = 43.4 %, Q2 = 32.5 %, Q3 = 22.7 %). The reproducibility of the IOP (DCT) measurements was excellent (first measurement IOP (DCT) = 18.1 +/- 3.4 mmHg, second measurement IOP (DCT) = 18.1 +/- 3.4 mmHg, third measurement IOP (DCT) = 17.8 +/- 3.4 mmHg, Cronbach's alpha = 0.976). First and second IOP (DCT) values showed a strong correlation (r = 0.93). A significant tonography effect was observed between first and third IOP (DCT) measurements (0.4 mmHg; p = 0.004). Mean OPA (DCT) was 3.0 mmHg during the first three measurements (Cronbach's alpha = 0.964). IOP (DCT) and OPA (DCT) reproducibility showed no laterality. IOP (DCT) (17.7 +/- 3.4 mmHg) was significantly higher than IOP (TonoPenXL) (16.0 +/- 3.2 mmHg, n = 275; p < 0.001) and higher than IOP (GAT) (14.5 +/- 3.1 mmHg, n = 275; p < 0.001). The effect of tonography between the third and last IOP (DCT) measurement was zero (p = 0.6). IOP (DCT) and IOP (GAT) values were only weak correlated with central corneal thickness. CONCLUSIONS: IOP and OPA values measured with the DCT are extraordinary reproducible in normal eyes. Frequently, DCT detects higher IOP values than those obtained with TonoPenXL and GAT. A reproducible measurement of IOP and OPA may open new diagnostic fields, e. g., in glaucoma detection or ocular vascular diseases.     

PASCAL动态轮廓眼压计临床应用的初步报告

目的:验证动态轮廓眼压计(DCT)的临床性能。方法:对81例143眼青光眼及可疑病例青光眼患者用DCT测量眼内压(IOP);132眼同时用Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)测量眼压,部分病例同时用NIDEKUP-1000型角膜测厚仪测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)。GAT与DCT测量结果采用配对t检验,GAT、DCT测量值与CCT的关系及DCT测量值与眼脉动振幅(OPA)的相关关系采用Spearman双变量相关分析。结果:①DCT和GAT测得的眼压均数分别为(18.6±3.9)mmHg和(17.4±4.1)mmHg;DCT测得的眼压值高于GAT,其差值均数为(1.1±2.3)mmHg;两种眼压计测得的眼压值呈正相关(r=0.83,P<0.01)。②116眼同时完成了DCT眼压测量及CCT测量,两者相关系数r=0.03,P=0.77;113眼同时完成了GAT眼压测量及CCT测量,两者相关系数r=0.28,P=0.003。③143眼同时记录了DCT眼压值和眼脉动振幅(OPA),其均数分别为(18.6±3.9)mmHg和(2.6±1.1)mmHg,两者的相关系数r=0.32,P<0.01。结论:以上结果初步证实:①DCT眼压计测量值与GAT眼压测量值高度相关,但DCT测量值略高于GAT测量值,提示DCT可用于临床诊断。②DCT测量值与CCT不相关,GAT测量值与CCT显著相关,提示DCT在青光眼诊断中有独特优势。③DCT测量的OPA与IOP值显著相关,相关的机制及临床意义有待探讨。     

Comparación de tonómetro de contorno dinámico,Goldmann y neumotonómetro en pacientes con hipertensión ocular y su relación con la paquimetría y amplitud del pulso ocular

PurposeTo determine the relationship between dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and pneumotonometry (PNT) in ocular hypertension patients (OHT) and their relationship to central corneal thickness (CCT) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA).MethodsSixty patients (101 eyes) with intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥21 mmHg using GAT and normal appearing optic nerve heads and normal visual fields were included. The following tests were performed simultaneously during a single visit: IOP using DCT, GAT and PNT, OPA using DCT and CCT using ultrasound pachymetry. We studied the difference IOP between these 3 tonometers using Wilcoxon non-parametric test and the effect of CCT on IOP and OPA, as well as the relationship between OPA and IOP using Spearman correlation coefficient.ResultsThe median PNT IOP was 24 mmHg (Inter-quartile range [IQR]: 22-26), median GAT IOP was 22 mmHg (IQR: 22-24), and median DCT IOP was 28.2 mmHg (IQR: 24.1-30.7). PNT and DCT had higher IOP values than GAT (median 2 mmHg and 6.2 mmHg, respectively). Mean CCT was 594.5 μm (SD 30.0). GAT IOP and DCT IOP showed an increase with increased corneal thickness (r: 0.209; P = .036 and r: 0.195; P = .051, respectively). PNT IOP did not change with CCT (r: 0.15; P = .12). The median OPA was 4.8 mmHg (IQR: 3.6-6.1), and significantly increased with GAT IOP (r: 0,38; P < .001) and with CCT (r: 0.287; P = .004). This association was unclear with IOP PNT and IOP DCT (r: 0.067; P = .50 and r: 0,17, P = .08, respectively).ConclusionsDCT and PNT IOP values were higher than GAT IOP measurements in ocular hypertension patients. GAT IOP showed a significant increase with increased corneal thickness. Increased OPA seems to correlate with increased CCT and IOP, particularly if GAT is used.     

Central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliative glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal population

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the relationship between central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by applanation tonometer in glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, and normal eyes. METHODS: A total of 125 subjects were included in the study. Twenty-six had primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), 25 had pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG), 24 had ocular hypertension (OHT), and 50 of them were normal. IOP values were measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer whereas CCT values were measured by ultrasonic pachymeter. RESULTS: CCT values in the OHT group (595.75+/-22.52 microm) were greater than the CCT values of the POAG group (539.92+/-21.50 microm), the PXG group (526.28+/-31.73 microm), and the normal group (533.96+/-29.25 microm) (p<0.05). Eight patients who were diagnosed with OHT showed IOP values of 21 mm Hg or lower with corrected IOP values according to CCT. CONCLUSIONS: Increased CCT may lead to falsely high values of IOP measured with Goldmann applanation tonometer. In this study, when IOP values of the OHT group were redefined according to the formulae regarding the CCT, the authors noted that one third of them were normal. Determination of the CCT in OHT cases is crucial since it has great impact on IOP values, measured with applanation tonometer, which is the main parameter in the diagnosis and follow-up of glaucoma.     

Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the Pascal dynamic contour,Canon TX‐10 non‐contact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in healthy subjects

Purpose: To investigate the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), Canon TX‐10 non‐contact tonometry (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements (GAT) in healthy subjects. Methods: IOP values of 135 eyes with normal corneas of 135 healthy volunteers were determined by DCT, NCT and by GAT. The CCT was measured using an ultrasonic pachymeter after all IOP determinations had been made. Results: When DCT measurements were compared (IOP = 17.52 ± 2.0 mmHg) with NCT measurements (IOP = 16.54 ± 2.77 mmHg) and GAT measurements (IOP = 15.07 ± 2.35 mmHg), DCT measurements were significantly higher than NCT and GAT (p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between CCT with both NCT (r = 0.260, p = 0.003) and GAT measurements (r = 0.257, p = 0.005). There was a weak correlation that was not statistically significant between CCT and DCT (r = 0.160, p = 0.079). Conclusion: The IOP measurements with DCT seem to be less dependent on CCT. NCT appears to be more affected by variation in CCT than GAT.     

Ocular pulse amplitude in patients with open angle glaucoma,normal tension glaucoma,and ocular hypertension

BACKGROUND/AIM: Intraocular pressure (IOP) is not a fixed constant value but rather has pulsatile components associated with cardiac action. The SmartLens dynamic observing tonometer (odc, Ophthalmic Development Company AG, Zurich, Switzerland) can measure and record simultaneously IOP and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA). It was the aim of this study to evaluate OPA in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and high IOP, normal tension glaucoma (NTG), and ocular hypertension (OHT). Furthermore, the authors examined whether there were any correlations with blood pressure. METHODS: 80 subjects were divided into four groups (n=20): 20 patients each with POAG, NTG, and OHT and 20 volunteers without any ocular pathology except for cataract served as a control group. RESULTS: The OPA of the POAG group was not statistically significant different from the control group and from the OHT group. However, OPA was statistically significant lower (p<0.01) in the NTG group compared with all other groups. The OPA of the OHT group was slightly higher compared to the healthy volunteers (p=0.09) and to the POAG patients (p=0.09). No statistically significant correlations with blood pressure could be detected. A logistic regression model was established which identified OPA as an independent risk factor for NTG. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated a decrease in OPA of patients suffering from NTG. Thus, measuring of OPA by the SmartLens dynamic observing tonometer could be helpful in the detection of NTG patients.     

Association between corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in glaucomatous and non‐glaucomatous eyes

Purpose: We aimed to determine corneal hysteresis values (CH) using the ocular response analyser (ORA) in non‐glaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes and their relationship with central corneal thickness (CCT). Methods: Corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and CCT were prospectively evaluated in 74 non‐glaucoma subjects with IOP < 21 mmHg and in 108 patients with treated primary open‐angle glaucoma (POAG). One eye in each subject was randomly selected for inclusion in the analysis. Results: Mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age was 59.2 ± 14.2 years in the non‐glaucoma group and 62.4 ± 9.8 years in the glaucoma group. Mean (± SD) GAT IOP was 15.7 ± 2.65 mmHg and 16.38 ± 2.73 mmHg in the non‐glaucoma and glaucoma groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in mean age (p = 0.396) or mean GAT IOP (p = 0.098). Mean (± SD) CH was 10.97 ± 1.59 mmHg in the non‐glaucoma and 8.95 ± 1.27 mmHg in the glaucoma groups, respectively. The difference in mean CH between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). There was a strong positive correlation between CH and CCT in the non‐glaucoma group (r = 0.743) and a significantly (p = 0.001) weaker correlation (r = 0.426) in the glaucoma group. Conclusions: Corneal hysteresis was significantly lower in eyes with treated POAG than in non‐glaucomatous eyes. The corneal biomechanical response was strongly associated with CCT in non‐glaucoma subjects, but only moderately so in glaucoma patients. It can be assumed that diverse structural factors, in addition to thickness, determine the differences in the corneal biomechanical profile between non‐glaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes. Corneal hysteresis could be a useful tool in the diagnosis of glaucoma.     

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties,refractive error,and ocular pulse amplitude

BackgroundAccurate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is essential in diagnosing and managing glaucoma. Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) is less dependent on corneal properties, such as thickness, elasticity, and rigidity, than Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). This study examined the relationship between GAT and DCT as well as their relationship with corneal properties and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA).MethodsGAT, DCT, OPA, pachymetry, refractive error, and corneal curvature measurements were obtained on 115 healthy volunteers.ResultsParticipants with thicker corneas (≥580 μm) had higher IOP measurements with GAT than DCT (P = 0.005). Those with thinner corneas (≤520 μm) had lower IOP with GAT versus DCT (P = 0.008). GAT and DCT readings did not differ significantly in corneas with average thickness (521 to 579 μm). A clinically significant IOP difference between DCT and GAT was found in 18.2% of subjects. A correlation was found between OPA and both refractive error and IOP (R² = .343, P < 0.0001). OPA was higher with increased IOP and decreased myopia.ConclusionDCT provides IOP measurements that are less dependent on corneal factors than GAT, aiding in diagnosis and treatment of patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Additional studies are necessary to examine the relationship between OPA, refractive error, and IOP and its possible association with increased incidence of glaucoma in myopic patients.     

Factors affecting ocular pulse amplitude in eyes with open angle glaucoma and glaucoma‐suspect eyes

Purpose: To investigate the associations between ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) as measured by dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and ocular and systemic factors in patients with open angle glaucoma (OAG) and in glaucoma suspects. Methods: One hundred and seventy‐three glaucoma‐suspect patients were consecutively enrolled. All subjects underwent intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement by DCT and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), OPA measurement by DCT, Humphrey visual field (HVF) examination and central corneal thickness measurements. Arterial pulse amplitude (APA) and ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) were defined as the difference between systolic and diastolic BP and the difference between mean arterial pressure and IOP, respectively. All subjects also completed a systemized questionnaire on systemic vascular morbidities. Results: Seventy‐four eyes were diagnosed with OAG, based on HVF results. The overall mean CCT was 538.2 ± 37.6 μm. In all 173 eyes, OPA was associated with spherical equivalent (SE, p < 0.001) and with IOP by GAT (p = 0.013) by multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis of the 77 subgroup eyes of patients for whom BP parameters were available also revealed that OPA was associated with SE (p = 0.007) and with IOP by GAT (p < 0.001). When the subjects were classified into the groups with low, intermediate and high cardiovascular risk based on the questionnaire, there was no difference in OPA among these groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Ocular pulse amplitude was associated with IOP measured by GAT and SE in patients with OAG and in glaucoma suspects. There was neither significant correlation between systemic hemodynamic parameters and OPA, nor difference of OPA in patients with different cardiovascular risk. OPA is primarily a measure of pressure, and there are certain limitations towards its use as a hemodynamic index.     

Physiological diurnal variability and characteristics of the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) with the dynamic contour tonometer (DCT-Pascal<Superscript>®</Superscript>)

PURPOSE: The Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) allows measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) independently of corneal properties. It records, simultaneously, haemodynamic IOP fluctuations and the difference between the systolic and the diastolic IOP corresponding to the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA). The OPA indirectly reflects choroidal perfusion and could be considered as an independent risk factor in glaucoma. We aimed to establish the physiological diurnal variability of the OPA and its correlations with other biophysical parameters because its characteristics remain partly unclear. METHOD: Prospective study including 52 eyes of 28 normal subjects with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) IOPs < 22 mmHg. Subjects treated with systemic medications that could interfere with blood pressure or heart rate were excluded. IOP was measured at 9:00 am, 1:00 pm, and 4:00 pm by GAT and DCT. Two consecutive GAT followed by three consecutive DCT measurements were performed in each session by the same clinician (SP). Only DCT measurements with quality 1 and 2 were taken into account. Blood pressure, pulse rate, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were recorded after the last IOP measurements. Spearman correlation coefficient was used for assessment of correlations. RESULTS: Mean age was 40 +/- 14 years. Mean DCT values were significantly higher than GAT readings (mean = 16.8 +/- 2.0 vs. 15.2 +/- 2.8 mmHg, P < 0.02). The mean OPA was 2.2 +/- 0.7 mmHg (range: 1-3.4 mmHg). The mean amplitude of diurnal OPA fluctuations was 0.4 mmHg. There was no significant difference in the mean OPA values at each time of the diurnal curve. The intraclass correlation (ICC) of only one OPA measurement in relation to part of total variance due to inter-measurement variation was 78%. Averaging over three independent readings of OPA improved ICC to 91%. The OPA was correlated with GAT (r = 0.31, P < 0.0001) and DCT IOP measurements (r = 0.49, P < 0.0001). It was correlated neither with blood pressure nor with age. OPA values of both eyes of the same individual were highly correlated (r = 0.89, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In normal healthy eyes, the ocular pulse amplitude remains stable during normal outpatient office hours and was not correlated with blood pressure or age of patients.     

Hornhautdickenunabhängige Methoden der Messung des Augeninnendrucks

Introduction

Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) has been the gold standard for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) for about 50 years. However, it depends on central corneal thickness (CCT) and is, therefore, prone to being incorrect. Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) has recently been introduced to measure IOP independently of CCT; however, DCT is costly and difficult. IOP measurement using the ocular response analyzer (ORA) offers noncontact tonometry with declaration of the corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc), which takes corneal hysteresis (CH) into account and is supposed to be independent of CCT.

Patients and methods

Using the ORA instrument, IOPcc was determined in 192 glaucoma eyes and 59 nonglaucoma eyes. Subsequently, measurement by DCT and GAT was performed. IOP measurements were compared and analyzed with respect to CCT and CH.

Results

Average values were as follows: IOPcc, 18.38±6.3 mmHg; GAT, 14.69±4.5 mmHg; DCT, 15.17±3.9 mmHg; CH, 9.96±2.5 mmHg; CCT, 552±57 μm. Neither CCT nor CH differed between the two groups. There was a positive correlation between GAT and CCT that did not exist for IOPcc and DCT values. However, IOPcc and DCT differed significantly in Bland–Altman analysis (p<0.01). Furthermore, these two IOP values differed significantly with respect to CH and the level of IOP.

Conclusion

Because IOPcc is not a primarily measured variable but also takes CH into account, a direct comparison of DCT and IOPcc values is not acceptable, and a simple correction factor may not be valid.     

Ocular pulse amplitude in patients with open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma, and ocular hypertensionby dynamic observing tonometry

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) in patients with different types of glaucoma, and also to evaluate the usefulness of OPA for the elucidation of normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). OPA is thought to reflect choroidal circulation. SUBJECTS: Sixty-six patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), 52 patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), 42 with ocular hypertension (OH) and 68 normal controls (NC) were enrolled in this study. METHODS: OPA was measured in all participants by dynamic observing tonometry(DOT). The correlation between OPA and the following parameters [IOP, refraction error (Ref), blood pressure, pulse pressure (PP), MD of Humphrey field analyzer 30-2, type of groups] was analyzed by linear and multiple regression analysis (MRA). Multiple logistic regression analysis (MLR) was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for evaluation of the association between OPA (including other factors) and the proportion of NTG. RESULTS: In MRA, IOP, Ref (< -3 D), PP and type of groups were significantly associated with OPA. The OPA in NTG was significantly lower than NC (p < 0.05). MLR demonstrated that OPA [OR 0.26 (95% CI, 0.12-0.57), p = 0.001] was associated with increased risk of having NTG. CONCLUSIONS: Lower OPA in patients with NTG suggests that there is insufficiency of ocular circulation in NTG. Evaluation of OPA may be useful for the elucidation of the pathogenesis of glaucoma.