急诊高龄患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术的临床对比研究

目的探讨急诊高龄患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术的临床治疗效果。方法 101例高龄急诊胆囊炎患者分别施行腹腔镜胆囊切除(LC)和开腹胆囊切除(OC)两种手术方法治疗,LC组53例,OC组48例,观察手术恢复及并发症等情况。结果在手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛、肠道功能恢复时间、住院时间、并发症发生率等方面,LC组明显优于OC组。结论高龄患者急性胆囊炎行LC并发症少,创伤小、痛苦小、恢复快,高龄患者急性胆囊炎行LC是安全可行的,并具有微创的优势。     

老年患者急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹式胆囊切除术的疗效比较

【摘要】〓目的〓比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与开腹式胆囊切除术(OC)治疗老年患者急性胆囊炎的安全性和有效性。方法〓选择从2007年1月至2012年12月收治的年龄超过70岁急性胆囊炎患者76例,分别采用LC(34例)与OC(42例)治疗。观察两组的手术时间、术中失血、术后住院时间和术后并发症。结果〓两组患者手术均顺利完成胆囊切除术,且LC组无中转开腹的病例。LC组的手术时间为95.2±19.7 min,OC组的手术时间为86.8±21.2 min,两者差异无统计学意义;LC组术中失血>500 mL的有2例(5.9%),OC组术中失血>500 mL的有8例(19.0%)(P<0.05);LC组的术后住院时间明显少于OC组(P<0.01)。总共有24例患者在术后出现了并发症(31.6%),其中LC组的术后并发症明显少于OC组(P<0.05)。结论〓急性胆囊炎老年患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗能缩短术后住院时间和减少术后并发症发生率。     

结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术的对照研究

目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)与开腹胆囊切除术(open cholecystectomy,OC)治疗结石性胆囊炎的疗效及并发症.方法:将343例结石性胆囊炎患者分为两组,220例行LC,123例行OC,观察两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛时间、肛门排气、术...     

高龄急性化脓坏疽性胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的对比分析

目的:对比分析腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗高龄急性化脓坏疽性胆囊炎患者的优越性。方法:回顾分析115例急性化脓坏疽性胆囊炎高龄患者的临床资料。其中60例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC组),55例行开腹胆囊切除术(open cholecystectomy,OC组),对比分析两组患者术中与术后等情况。结果:115例手术均获成功。两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间及术后恢复情况差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗高龄急性化脓坏疽性胆囊炎具有手术时间短、术中出血少、术后肠道功能恢复快、痛苦轻及住院时间短等优点,临床经验丰富、腹腔镜技术掌握熟练的术者首选腹腔镜手术治疗。     

腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的效果比较

目的比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)与开腹胆囊切除术(opencholecystectomy,OC)治疗急性胆囊炎的效果。方法回顾性比较行胆囊切除术治疗的急性胆囊炎患者114例,其中LC 53例,OC 61例,比较两种手术的手术时间、术中出血量、下床活动时间、术后排气时间、住院时间、住院综合费用、切口感染率和置引流管率的差异。结果与OC组比较,LC组手术时间、下床活动时间和术后排气时间短,术中出血量少,住院时间短,住院费用低,切口感染率低,置引流管的比率低,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。两组患者中均无胆道损伤、胆漏病例。均获随访,平均时间13.3(2~48)个月,均未发现胆管损伤、胆漏损伤、胆囊残株炎、胆囊切除术后综合征等并发症。结论与OC相比,LC治疗急性胆囊炎具有创伤小、并发症少和综合费用少等优点,是治疗急性胆囊炎可行的手术方式。     

腹腔镜胆囊大部切除治疗急性坏疽性胆囊炎的临床分析

目的 探讨腹腔镜胆囊大部切除治疗急性坏疽性胆囊炎的临床疗效.方法 回顾120例急性坏疽性胆囊炎患者实施腹腔镜胆囊大部切除术后、观察其疗效及并发症的发生率.结果 120例急性坏疽性胆囊炎患者均成功施行腹腔镜胆囊大部切除、手术成功率为100%.平均手术时间(60.2±29.2) min、平均住院时间4～7 d、平均引流管留置时间2～5 d.术后无并发症发生.除择期手术组与急诊手术组手术时间(35.0±10.0) min vs.(55.0±12.0) min两组差异有统计学意义,P<0.05外,其他无统计学意义.结论 腹腔镜胆囊大部切除术治疗急性坏疽性胆囊炎是安全、有效的方法之一.     

腹腔镜和开腹胆囊切除术治疗慢性胆囊炎急性发作疗效分析

目的探讨比较腹腔镜和开腹胆囊切除术治疗慢性胆囊炎急性发作的临床效果。方法回顾性分析45例腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC组)与48例开腹胆囊切除术(OC组)患者的临床资料,对比2组患者术中情况、术后恢复情况及并发症比例。结果LC组的手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度均少于OC组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.01),其中LC组有2例术中转开腹手术;LC组住院时间、住院费用、肛门排气时间、术后疼痛时间、下床活动时间均少于OC组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.01);而LC组和OC组的术后并发症发生率分别为6.7%和8.3%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗慢性胆囊炎急性发作,与开腹手术比较,具有创伤小、疼痛轻、恢复快、并发症少的特点,值得临床推广应用。     

腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术对急性结石性胆囊炎患者胃肠功能的影响

观察腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术对急性结石性胆囊炎患者胃肠功能影响的差异。100例急性结石性胆囊炎患者中80例行腹腔镜手术(LC组),20例行常规开腹胆囊切除术(OC组)。LC组手术后整体疼痛程度、术后平均住院时间及切口美容效果(切口长度)显著优于OC组(P0.05);LC组术后肠鸣音恢复时间、肛门排气排便时间、进食时间显著短于OC组(P0.05),且手术后血清CRP水平低于OC组(P0.05)。相对于传统开腹手术,腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎术后疼痛更少,对机体损伤更小,对肠胃功能影响更轻,利于患者康复。     

老年急性结石性胆囊炎急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的效果

目的探讨急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)治疗老年急性结石性胆囊炎的效果。方法将接受急诊手术的80例老年急性结石性胆囊炎患者随机分为2组,每组40例。开腹组行开腹胆囊切除术(OC),腔镜组实施LC。比较2组的疗效。结果 2组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。腔镜组术中出血量及术后肛门恢复排气时间、住院时间、并发症发生率均优于开腹组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论急诊LC治疗老年急性结石性胆囊炎,创伤小、术后并发症少、患者术后恢复快,效果优于OC。     

PTGD联合LC治疗高原地区老年急性胆囊炎

目的：探讨高原地区老年急性胆囊炎行经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术联合二期腹腔镜胆囊切除的可 行性。 方法：对收治的30例老年急性胆囊炎患者分别行经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术联合二期腹腔镜胆囊切除术（PTGD+LC）及一期常规胆囊切除术（OC）,比较两组手术时间,术中出血量、术后并发症、术后恢复时间及费用方面进行分析,总结治疗效果和临床经验。 结果：两组手术方式比较后,PTGD+LC术从手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症、恢复时间方面均优于OC术。 结论：高原地区老年急性胆囊炎发病急,基础疾病多,经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术联合二期腹腔镜胆囊切除术优于传统胆囊切除术。

     

急症腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转开腹危险因素的分析

目的:分析术前预测急症腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)中转开腹的可能性,以期找到客观、实用、准确率高的预测LC手术难易度的方法,并选择适当的手术方式.方法:回顾分析2005～2009年120例急症LC中38例中转开腹患者的临床资料.从胆囊炎、胆囊结石疾病病理方面提取胆囊...     

Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the treatment of choice for symptomatic gallstones; however conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC) remains a possibility. Unfortunately, preoperative factors indicating risk of conversion are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to identify risk factors associated with conversion of LC to OC. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: Records of 564 patients undergoing LC in 1995 and 1996 were reviewed. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: (1) acute cholecystitis defined by the presence of gallstones, fever, leukocyte count >10(4), and inflammation on ultrasound or histology; (2) chronic cholecystitis that included all other symptomatic patients. Demographics, history, and physical, laboratory, and radiology data, operative note, and the pathology report were reviewed. RESULTS: 161 of 564 patients, had acute and 403 patients had chronic cholecystitis; 16 acute cholecystitis patients (10%) were converted from LC to OC and 17 chronic cholecystitis patients (4%) had LC converted to OC. Patients having open conversion were significantly older, had greater prevalence of cardiovascular disease, and were more likely to be males. LC conversion to OC in acute cholecystitis patients was associated with a greater leukocyte count; in gangrenous cholecystitis patients, 29% had open conversion. CONCLUSIONS: Importantly, these risk factors-older men, presence of cardiovascular disease, male gender, acute cholecystitis, and severe inflammation-are determined preoperatively, permitting the surgeon to better inform patients about the conversion risk from LC to OC. While acute cholecystitis was associated with more than a twofold increased conversion rate, only 10% of these patients could not be completed laparoscopically. Therefore, acute cholecystitis alone should not preclude an attempt at laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

急性坏疽性胆囊炎腹腔镜治疗体会（附20例报告）

目的探讨腹腔镜治疗急性坏疽性胆囊炎的手术技巧性。方法回顾性分析我院自2006年4月至2007年7月LC治疗急性坏疽性胆囊炎20例临床资料。结果本组无一例中转开腹手术。1例由于胆囊壁已大部分坏疽、无法完整切除胆囊故行胆囊大部分切除，胆囊床电凝烧灼，术后无并发症发生，术后住院时间（除胆总管结石病例）3-5d。结论在急性坏疽性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除时，联合使用超声刀、吸引器等方法。可减少出血，保持解剖清晰，提高安全、降低中转开腹率，值得进一步推广和应用。     

Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gangrenous cholecystitis

Treatment of severe acute cholecystitis by laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains controversial because of technical difficulties and high rates of complications and conversion to open cholecystectomy. We investigated whether early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is appropriate for acute gangrenous cholecystitis. Pathologic diagnoses and outcomes were analyzed in patients who underwent laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy at our hospital, January 2002 to September 2005. Of 30 patients with acute gangrenous cholecystitis, 16 underwent early laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 10 underwent open cholecystectomy, and 4 were converted to open cholecystectomy (conversion rate, 20.0%). There was no significant difference in operation time or intraoperative bleeding. The requirement for postoperative analgesics was significantly lower (6.4+/-7.3 vs. 1.5+/-1.2 doses, P<0.05) and hospital stay significantly shorter (8.6+/-2.1 vs. 15.6+/-6.3 d, P<0.01) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There were no postoperative complications in either group. Thus, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy seems appropriate for acute gangrenous cholecystitis. Conversion to open cholecystectomy may be required in difficult cases with complications.     

An early review of 800 laparoscopic cholecystectomies at a university-affiliated community teaching hospital.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was first performed at Georgia Baptist Medical Center (GBMC) in December 1989, subsequently becoming the treatment of choice for most patients with symptomatic gallbladder disease. Early in the authors' series, all patients evaluated for cholecystitis were treated laparoscopically, unless the third party refused reimbursement or the attending surgeon was not trained in LC. Indications for LC were no different than for standard open cholecystectomy (OC). Eight hundred patients from December 1989 to March 1991 had an attempted LC at GBMC. The procedure was completed in 782 patients (97.7%) and required conversion to OC in 18 patients, (2.3%) primarily because of technical difficulties such as dense adhesions or gangrenous changes. No patient sustained a trocar injury to the intra-abdominal viscera, bile ducts injury, or major vascular injury. Overall morbidity was 3.1 per cent and mortality 0.13 per cent. Selective cholangiography (SIOC) was used in 14 per cent. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), choledochoscopy, and Fogarty catheter techniques were used for common bile duct stone management. Average hospitalization was 0.89 days, with 85 per cent discharged in less than 24 hours. Average operative time was 86 minutes (range: 25 to 353). Patients returned to full activities at home in 8.4 days. Savings on hospital charges to patients averaged $1,100 for inpatient LC and $2,500 for outpatient LC when compared to 1989 costs for OC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current surgical procedure of choice for most patients with cholecystitis and can be done at least as safely as standard open cholecystectomy. The morbidity appears to be significantly less with LC, but longer follow-up is needed to confirm these preliminary findings.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的体会

目的:探讨急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的安全性。方法:对急性结石性胆囊炎185例施行LC。结果:顺利完成LC177例,中转开腹手术8例。全组无死亡病例,无胆管损伤,出血等严重并发症。结论:急性结石性胆囊炎为LC手术的适应证。要求术者具有丰富的LC手术经验和及时中转开腹手术的思想准备。     

急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术192例临床分析

目的：探讨急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术（laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC）治疗急性胆囊炎（acute cholecystitis,AC）的手术时机与临床效果。方法：回顾分析为192例AC患者行LC的临床资料,其中单纯性胆囊炎57例,化脓性胆囊炎115例,坏疽性胆囊炎20例,合并胆囊穿孔4例。发病至手术时间72 h内154例（A组）,〉72 h 38例（B组）。161例完整切除胆囊（C组）,31例行部分切除术（D组）。结果：A、B两组患者手术时间、术后住院时间、中转开腹、放置引流管比例差异均有统计学意义,C、D两组仅放置引流管比例差异有统计学意义。均无胆管损伤、手术死亡等严重并发症发生。结论：对于急性胆囊炎,手术时机的把握是手术成功的关键。发病72 h内施术,操作简单易行、预后好。操作困难、手术难度较大的病例,过分追求完整切除胆囊可造成出血、损伤等并发症,部分切除术同样有效。     

老年人急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜手术治疗

目的探讨老年人急性胆囊炎采用腹腔镜手术治疗的临床效果与应用价值。方法回顾性分析105例因急性胆囊炎实施胆囊切除术的老年患者的临床资料,按手术方式分为腹腔镜组(LC组)和剖腹胆囊切除术组(OC组)。结果两组患者手术时间、肠功能恢复时间及住院天数差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),LC组优于OC组;术中出血、腹腔引流量和术后并发症两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论老年急性胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜治疗是安全可行的。