Optimizing recent advances in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The past few years have seen dramatic advances in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Dissection of the molecular pathways that regulate proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis has led to the development of targeted therapies such as the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sunitinib and sorafenib, the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody bevacizumab, and a class of rapamycin analogues including everolimus and temsirolimus. Each of these agents has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with metastatic RCC. The challenge before us is to expand on these successes by identifying which patients will best respond to these targeted therapies, optimizing the proper combination or sequence of available therapies, developing agents with improved side effect profiles, and identifying novel therapeutic targets to expand our armamentarium in the treatment of RCC.     

Recommendations from the Spanish Oncology Genitourinary Group for the treatment of metastatic renal cancer

For almost the last two decades, interleukin-2 and interferon-α have been the only systemic treatment options available for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. However, in recent years, five new targeted therapies namely sunitinib, sorafenib, temsirolimus, everolimus and bevacizumab have demonstrated clinical activity in these patients. With the availability of new targeted agents that are active in this disease, there is a need to continuously update the treatment algorithm of the disease. Due to the important advances obtained, the Spanish Oncology Genitourinary Group (SOGUG) has considered it would be useful to review the current status of the disease, including the genetic and molecular biology factors involved, the current predicting models for development of metastases as well as the role of surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapies in the early- or late management of the disease. Based on this previous work, a treatment algorithm was developed.     

Targeted therapies used sequentially in metastatic renal cell cancer: overall results from a large experience

Targeted therapies have improved survival in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC); however, expert opinion on the optimal therapeutic strategy is divided. This retrospective study evaluates different sequential schemes of targeted therapies in 310 patients with advanced/metastatic RCC who received different systemic agents - sorafenib, sunitinib, bevacizumab, everolimus, temsirolimus and axitinib - alone or in different sequences, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity (median follow-up: 37 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 22 months and the 5-year OS was 23.4%; differential therapeutic schemes were not associated with differences in OS. A worse performance status, no nephrectomy and a poor-risk classification according to the Motzer criteria was associated with a shorter OS. These findings support the use of targeted therapies in the treatment of RCC, even in a large unselected population from a single institution, and suggest that treatment should be tailored to meet individual circumstances and needs.     

Sequential therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: pre-clinical and clinical rationale for selecting a second- or subsequent-line therapy with a different mechanism of action

Few types of cancer have had their treatment evolve as rapidly as metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Since 2005, six new targeted therapies with proven efficacy have been approved for the treatment of mRCC. The downside is that our knowledge about the mechanisms of action of these therapies and the intrinsic and extrinsic mechanism of resistance has not evolved equally fast, and many questions remain unanswered. The only approved agent to date in the European Union for patients who progress on sunitinib or sorafenib is everolimus. The results of the phase III trial comparing axitinib vs. sorafenib after failure on sunitinib, bevacizumab, temsirolimus, or cytokines have recently been published, and axitinib has recently been licensed by the Food and Drugs Administration. Other phase III trials that are being conducted include a comparison between everolimus plus bevacizumab and everolimus after failure on tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and between temsirolimus and sorafenib after failure on sunitinib. In this article, we will review the available evidence from clinical studies on sequential therapy for mRCC, including those that are still in progress. In addition, information on the mechanism of resistance or tolerance to first-line therapy, recommendations of the main practice guidelines for second-line treatment, potential therapies for third or successive treatment lines, and the major reasons why patients who progress may benefit from a change of mechanism of action will also be discussed.     

Patients with advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy in the Czech Republic: twenty cancer centres, six agents, one database

The incidence and mortality of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the Czech Republic are among the highest in the world. Several targeted agents have been recently approved for the treatment of advanced/metastatic RCC. Objective: Presentation of a national clinical database for monitoring and assessment of patients with advanced/metastatic RCC treated with targeted therapy. The RenIS (RENal Information System, http://renis.registry.cz) registry is a non-interventional post-registration database of epidemiological and clinical data of patients with RCC treated with targeted therapies in the Czech Republic. Twenty cancer centres eligible for targeted therapy administration participate in the project. As of November 2011, six agents were approved and reimbursed from public health insurance, including bevacizumab, everolimus, pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib, and temsirolimus. As of 10 October 2011, 1,541 patients with valid records were entered into the database. Comparison with population-based data from the Czech National Cancer Registry revealed that RCC patients treated with targeted therapy are significantly younger (median age at diagnosis 59 vs. 66?years). Most RenIS registry patients were treated with sorafenib and sunitinib, many patients sequentially with both agents. Over 10?% of patients were also treated with everolimus in the second or third line. Progression-free survival times achieved were comparable to phase III clinical trials. The RenIS registry has become an important tool and source of information for the management of cancer care and clinical practice, providing comprehensive data on monitoring and assessment of RCC targeted therapy on a national level.     

Renal cell carcinoma: evolving approaches to advanced non-clear cell carcinoma

The treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has changed dramatically with the introduction of targeted therapies including sunitinib, sorafenib, and temsirolimus. Because patients with conventional clear cell histology account for 75–80% of all patients with RCC, there has been little accumulated evidence on the treatment of patients with non-clear cell histologies. Most clinical trials have excluded them from enrolment, except for randomized studies investigating temsirolimus. Many retrospective studies on the use of all three of these targeted therapies in patients with non-clear cell histology have demonstrated response rates ranging from 3.7%–16%. Although response rates may not be as high compared to patients with clear cell histologies, targeted therapy does provide a clinically meaningful response.     

Updates on novel therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) poses one of the great therapeutic challenges in oncology. RCC is predominantly refractory to treatment with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapies, and until recently management options were limited to immunotherapy or palliative care. However, in the past few years we have experienced a sea change in the treatment of advanced RCC with the introduction of targeted therapies that derive their efficacy at least in part through alterations in tumor angiogenesis. The tyrosine kinase inhibitors sunitinib, pazopanib, and sorafenib, the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (in combination with interferon-α), and the rapamycin analogs, temsirolimus and everolimus, are now approved agents in the United States for the treatment of metastatic RCC. Efforts to expand upon these successes include developing novel antiangiogenic agents, optimizing concomitant and sequential regimens, identifying predictors of response to specific treatments, and further dissecting the underlying molecular pathogenesis of RCC to reveal novel therapeutic targets.     

Maximising the duration of disease control in metastatic renal cell carcinoma with targeted agents: an expert agreement

With six targeted agents approved (sorafenib, sunitinib, temsirolimus, bevacizumab [+interferon], everolimus and pazopanib), many patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) will receive multiple therapies. However, the optimum sequencing approach has not been defined. A group of European experts reviewed available data and shared their clinical experience to compile an expert agreement on the sequential use of targeted agents in mRCC. To date, there are few prospective studies of sequential therapy. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus was approved for use in patients who failed treatment with inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptors (VEGFR) based on the results from a Phase III placebo-controlled study; however, until then, the only licensed agents across the spectrum of mRCC were VEGF(R) inhibitors (sorafenib, sunitinib and bevacizumab + interferon), and as such, a large body of evidence has accumulated regarding their use in sequence. Data show that sequential use of VEGF(R) inhibitors may be an effective treatment strategy to achieve prolonged clinical benefit. The optimal place of each targeted agent in the treatment sequence is still unclear, and data from large prospective studies are needed. The Phase III AXIS study of second-line sorafenib vs. axitinib (including post-VEGF(R) inhibitors) has completed, but the data are not yet published; other ongoing studies include the Phase III SWITCH study of sorafenib-sunitinib vs. sunitinib-sorafenib (NCT00732914); the Phase III 404 study of temsirolimus vs. sorafenib post-sunitinib (NCT00474786) and the Phase II RECORD 3 study of sunitinib-everolimus vs. everolimus-sunitinib (NCT00903175). Until additional data are available, consideration of patient response and tolerability to treatment may facilitate current decision-making regarding when to switch and which treatment to switch to in real-life clinical practice.     

Second-Line Treatment Outcomes After First-Line Sunitinib Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

This study was conducted to evaluate the treatment outcomes associated with common second-line targeted therapies given after first-line sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The sample comprised patients with mRCC (n = 257) who were receiving second-line everolimus, sorafenib, or temsirolimus between April 1, 2008, and February 29, 2011, after first-line sunitinib treatment. The patients were followed-up from the start of second-line treatment until treatment failure (defined as advancement to a third-line therapy or to mortality) or the last observation in the medical and pharmacy databases. Treatment failure was observed in 38.5% (n = 99) of cases: 20.2% of patients (n = 52) advanced a line of treatment; and 18.3% of patients (n = 47) died. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated a statistical difference in time to treatment failure among the 3 second-line targeted therapies (log-rank test, P = .045). The estimated 1-year cumulative probabilities of treatment failure were 49.9% for everolimus, 68.4% for sorafenib, and 71.4% for temsirolimus. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, a higher adjusted risk of treatment failure vs. everolimus was observed for both temsirolimus (hazard ratio [HR] 2.05 [95% CI, 1.26-3.35]; P = .004) and sorafenib (HR 1.77 [95% CI, 1.02-3.07]; P = .043). The results of this real-world data analysis suggest that the risk of second-line treatment failure after first-line sunitinib was significantly higher with temsirolimus and sorafenib compared with everolimus.     

Future directions of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor therapy in renal cell carcinoma

With an explosion of available treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in recent years, it is important to recognize that approved targeted therapies fall broadly into only two mechanistic categories. The first category, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-directed therapies, includes sunitinib, pazopanib, sorafenib and bevacizumab. The second category includes inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), namely everolimus and temsirolimus. A pivotal trial of everolimus supports use of the agent in patients with mRCC refractory to VEGF- tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) therapy, while pivotal data for temsirolimus supports use in poor-prognosis patients as first-line therapy. Multiple reviews exist to delineate the laboratory and clinical development of mTOR inhibitors. This paper will outline the future applications of these therapies. It will explore ongoing trials evaluating combinations of mTOR inhibitors with other targeted therapies, along with sequencing strategies and biomarker discovery efforts. The application of mTOR inhibitors in unique populations is also described.     

舒尼替尼治疗肾细胞癌的新进展

肾细胞癌（ｒｅｎａｌｃｅｌｌｃａｒｃｉｎｏｍａ,ＲＣＣ）是最常见的肾脏肿瘤,其发病率呈逐年上升趋势,近年来随着ＲＣＣ增殖分子机制研究的深入和新的分子靶向药物不断问世,ＲＣＣ患者的生存率及生活质量均得到显著提高,ＲＣＣ的治疗进入了分子靶向时代。更重要是的,多靶点药物舒尼替尼已经取代传统的ＩＦＮ被列为转移性ＲＣＣ的一线标准治疗药物,联合分子靶向治疗与免疫治疗将是未来的发展方向。本文就舒尼替尼治疗ＲＣＣ的研究现状及进展作一综述。     

“Real World” Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Joint Community-Academic Cohort: Progression-Free Survival Over Three Lines of Therapy

BackgroundNew targeted therapeutics approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) offer multiple options in each line of therapy; however, there are few prospective data beyond the first-line settings, and overall comparative effectiveness data are limited. In the targeted therapy era, progression-free survival (PFS) has been the most common regulatory end point for demonstrating the benefit of new therapies.Patients and MethodsDrawing on a joint community-academic retrospective mRCC registry, we analyzed all patients who had undergone at least 1 line of systemic therapy (N = 325) for PFS. Patients were grouped according to treatment choice (sorafenib, sunitinib, temsirolimus, everolimus, and “other”) for up to 3 lines of therapy. PFS by treatment choice and line of therapy was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.ResultsPFS was longest in patients treated with sunitinib in the first and second lines of therapy. First-line PFS for sorafenib, sunitinib, temsirolimus, everolimus, and “other” was 6.9, 8.9, 4.2, not analyzed (too few patients), and 10.8 months, respectively. Second-line PFS was 4.6, 7.0, 3.2, 3.8, and 4.1 months, respectively. Third-line PFS was 4.5, 4.6, 9.9, 4.2, and 2.9, months, respectively. The risk of progression in patients treated with temsirolimus was about twice that of patients treated with sunitinib in the first and second lines of therapy.ConclusionPatients treated with sunitinib had the longest PFS in the first and second lines of therapy. PFS from practice-based data appear consistent with trial-based expectations; however, practice variation was still evident.     

Long-term stable disease in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: sorafenib sequenced to sunitinib and everolimus: a case study

Long-term stabilization of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by the sequence of sorafenib monotherapy followed by sunitinib and everolimus treatments in a man with multiple metastases is reported. A 66-year-old man was diagnosed with advanced RCC in 2005. The patient initially underwent nephrectomy, but subsequently the disease metastasized to the lung, lymph nodes, and pancreas. The patient received sorafenib 400 mg bid in a clinical trial. He experienced minimal and manageable adverse events and achieved stable disease (SD), which was maintained with sorafenib therapy for nearly 3 years before the development of liver metastases. The patient was then prescribed sunitinib, with which he also experienced SD for 1.2 years until disease progression prompted the initiation of third-line everolimus therapy, resulting in SD for another 8 months. The patient lived with stabilized RCC for 4.6 years with the use of these three sequential targeted therapies. First-line sorafenib monotherapy achieved a durable stable response and subsequent use of sunitinib and then everolimus permitted a return to SD after disease progression. The patient experienced minimal toxicity from the regimen, suggesting that it can be safely administered to elderly patients.     

Molecular basis for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous malignancy whose incidence rate has notably increased in recent years without any evident reason. Traditionally, RCC has been resistant to classic treatments (chemotherapy, radiotherapy and hormonal therapy), with only a small percentage of patients benefiting from cytokine therapy. Different hereditary syndromes have been associated with RCC, Von Hippel Lindau (VHL) being the most important syndrome. Understanding key molecular pathways implicated in the tumorigenesis of RCC has crystallised in the development of more effective therapies. Specifically, drugs targeting VEGF (bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib, axitinib, pazopanib) and PI3K-mTOR (temsirolimus and everolimus) have become the cornerstone of renal cancer treatment.     

Sequential Targeted Therapy After Pazopanib Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer: Efficacy and Toxicity

Introduction/BackgroundPatients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in whom first-line therapies have failed might derive clinical benefit with sequential targeted agents. Limited data are available on the efficacy and toxicity of subsequent therapies after disease progression during pazopanib therapy.Patients and MethodsPatients with mRCC who received subsequent systemic treatment after pazopanib treatment failure were identified across 7 institutions. Pazopanib was given as first-line therapy in 28 patients and after cytokines therapy in 7 patients. Clinical outcome and toxicity analyses of 2 sequential treatment options (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor [mTORi]) is presented.ResultsSubsequent therapy was anti-VEGF in 22 patients and mTORi in 13. One patient who received bevacizumab and temsirolimus combination was excluded. VEGF-targeted therapies included sorafenib (n = 10), sunitinib (n = 3), bevacizumab (n = 2), cediranib (n = 4) and cabozantinib (n = 3). Patients treated with mTORi received everolimus. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months from the start of subsequent therapy with anti-VEGF and 2.4 months with mTORi (P = .009). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different (P = .68). Clinical benefit (including partial response and stable disease) on subsequent therapy was observed in 15 patients (64%) and 4 patients (31%) of anti–VEGF- and everolimus-treated patients, respectively (P = .021).ConclusionIn this retrospective study, targeting VEGF was an effective strategy after disease progression during pazopanib treatment, although OS was not different among patients treated with VEGF or mTORi.     

晚期肾癌靶向治疗的现状与进展

随着对肾癌发生发展过程的分子信号通路研究的不断深入,晚期肾癌的靶向治疗取得了重大进展.曾作为标准的细胞因子治疗效果不佳且有明显毒副作用,而靶向治疗已显示出在治疗晚期肾癌方面的明显优势.本文对舒尼替尼、索拉非尼、贝伐单抗、帕唑帕尼、Temsirolimus、依维莫司六种靶向药物的临床疗效,毒副作用以及对策,在贯序治疗、联合治疗和新辅助治疗方面的进展作一综述.     

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with VEGF-targeted agents

The medical treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has undergone a paradigm shift during the last decade with the approval of five drugs targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or its receptors (bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib and axitinib) and of two drugs inhibiting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathway (temsirolimus and everolimus). Median survival has now reached 2 years in mRCC patients receiving first-line targeted treatment. A considerable body of work was conducted on the identification of prognostic factors of survival in the earlier era of immunotherapy of mRCC. The current challenge is to pursue this work on biomarkers of prognosis for targeted therapy and, even more importantly, to identify predictive factors of response to such therapy. This review provides an overview of recent key work on prognostic and predictive factors in patients with advanced clear cell RCC treated with VEGF-targeted agents.     

Targeting von Hippel-Lindau pathway in renal cell carcinoma.

Inheritance of a defective copy of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene leads to the most common cause of inherited renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In addition, most patients with sporadic RCC have aberrant VHL. In the absence of VHL, hypoxia-inducible factor alpha accumulates, leading to production of several growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor. We review here the biology of RCC and how a combination of proximal and distal block of VHL/hypoxia-inducible factor alpha pathway by novel targeted agents, including sunitinib, sorafenib, bevacizumab, everolimus, and temsirolimus, has led to significant improvements in progression-free survival.     

Current options for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma: focus on sunitinib

Recent developments in molecular biology have increased our understanding of the biology and genetics of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and identified pathways for novel targeted therapy. Several targeted therapies are now available that show promising activity in this disease. Sunitinib, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has recently been approved for first-line treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC) and is the new reference standard for the treatment of clear-cell disease. Three other promising TKIs are temsirolimus, approved for the treatment of advanced RCC, sorafenib, approved for the treatment of patients with advanced RCC who have failed or are considered unsuitable for cytokine therapy and bevacizumab, effective in combination with immunotherapy for first-line therapy of mRCC. Several other agents are under investigation as single-agent or combination therapy for mRCC. These include the TKIs axitinib, pazopanib, everolimus, erlotinib, gefitinib and lapatinib. Use of these agents is leading to the development of treatment paradigms that will transform the management of mRCC.     

New systemic treatment options for metastatic renal‐cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapies

Advances in understanding the biology and genetics of renal‐cell carcinomas have led to the development of novel targeted therapies for the treatment of metastatic renal‐cell cancer. Previously the systemic approaches were limited to cytokine therapies that were modest in their clinical benefits and at the expense of significant toxicities. Investigational treatments with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation were equally toxic and resulted in significant morbidity and mortality. The development of targeted therapy has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic renal‐cell cancer with more meaningful outcomes. This review aims to provide a detailed discussion of the clinical benefits of targeted therapies such as sunitinib, sorafenib, temsirolimus, everolimus, bevacizumab, and some of the newer agents in clinical trial development. The efficacy of these compounds in terms of response, survival and clinical benefit are explored as well as their toxicities. The role of surgery in metastatic renal‐cell carcinoma is reviewed in the context of cytoreductive therapy and resection of solitary and oligometastatic disease. Ongoing studies in the adjuvant setting following curative resection are also reviewed. The availability of targeted therapies has led to their rapid adoption as frontline therapy over traditional cytokine therapy, thus bringing more optimistic and hopeful therapeutic options in a condition where historically, systemic treatments have been relatively unsatisfactory and disappointing.