Suppression of the endogenous luteinizing hormone surge by the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix during ovarian stimulation

Surges of luteinizing hormone (LH) that result In luteinizationbut occur prematurely with respect to the diameter of the leadingfolilde, prevent attempts to induce multiple follicular maturationfor in-vitro fertilization (IVF) in a significant number ofwomen. We examined the possibility of blocking premature LIIsurges by the administration of Cetrorelix, a potent antagonistof gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH), in a study Including20 patients, some of whom had previously shown premature LHsurges. All patients were treated with human menopausal gonadotrophins(HMG) starting on day 2. From day 7 until the induction of ovulationby human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) the GnRII antagon Cetrorelixwas given daily. HCG was injected when the dominant fofficlehad reached a diameter of >18 mm and oestradlol concentrationwas >300 pg/ml for each follicle having a diameter of >15mm. Oocyte collection was performed 36 h later by transvaginalultrasound puncture, followed by IVF and embryo transfer. Thehormone profiles of these patients and the results of IVF andembryo transfer are comparable to those treated with GnRH agonistsand HMG. However, less time and especially less HMG Is neededin comparison to patients stimulated with a long agonist protocol.Hence, treatment with Cetrorelix proved to be much more comfortablefor the patient. In this study we showed that combined treatmentwith gonadotrophins and the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix is apromising method for ovarian stimulation in patients who frequentlyexhibit premature LH surges and therefore fall to complete treatment.     

Endocirnology: Comparison between prolactin, gonadotrophins and steroid hormones in serum and follicular fluid after stimulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists and human menopausal gonadotrophin for an in-vitro fertilization programme

The inter-relationship between serum and follicular fluid prolactin,oestradiol, progesterone, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH),and luteinizing hormone (LH) in two groups of women was investigated.In group 1, 32 women were treated with gonadotrophin-releasinghormone agonist (GnRH-a) in a long term protocol and subsequentlystimulated with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG). In group2, 25 women were simultaneously stimulated with GnRH-a in ashort protocol with HMG. Follicular fluid was collected from54 follicles in group 1 and 47 follicles in group 2. Serum wasobtained on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration.Serum prolactin and oestradiol concentrations were significantlyhigher (P < 0.025 and P< 0.01, respectively) in group1 than in group 2. Serum LH (P < 0.005), FSH (P< 0.01)and progesterone (P < 0.025) were significantly lower ingroup 1 than in group 2. Follicular fluid prolactin was significantlyhigher (P < 0.005) in group 1. No differences were foundin follicular fluid progesterone and oestradiol. Follicularfluid LH was significantly lower (P < 0.005) in group 1.Serum prolactin correlated positively with oestradiol in bothgroups (P < 0.005 group 1; P < 0.02 group 2). No significantcorrelation was found between serum prolactin and LH in group1. We conclude that prolactin secretion is independent fromLH secretion. Hyperprolactinaemia, which is observed in womenstimulated with GnRH-a and HMG, is positively associated withincreased oestradiol.     

Ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction with HMG and concomitant midcycle administration of the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix according to the multiple dose protocol: a prospective uncontrolled phase III study

A total of 346 women with normal ovulatory function was stimulated with human menopausal gonadotrophins (HMG) to attain ovarian stimulation for IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Stimulation with HMG started on cycle day 2 or 3. After 6 days of stimulation, Cetrorelix in its minimum effective multiple dose of 0. 25 mg/day, was administered daily until induction of ovulation. In total, 333 patients (96.2%) reached the day of HCG administration, and 324 (93.6%) underwent oocyte retrieval. A mean of 25.2 ampoules of HMG was applied for a mean of 10.4 days. Cetrorelix was administered for a mean time lapse of 5.7 days. The mean normal fertilization rate was 60% in the IVF group and 59% in the ICSI group. Seventy pregnancies were attained, reflecting an ongoing clinical pregnancy rate of 24% per transfer. The ongoing clinical implantation rate was 11.4%. Only three cases of raised luteinizing hormone (LH) (>/=10 IU/l) with increased progesterone secretion (>/=1 ng/ml) were observed after initiation of Cetrorelix administration, reflecting an incidence of premature luteinization of 0.9%. The abortion rate was 17%. The incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (World Health Organization grade III) was as low as 0.6%.     

Relationship of biochemical pregnancy to pre-ovulatory endometrial thickness and pattern in patients undergoing ovulation induction

In order to assess the relationship between pre-ovulatory endometrialthickness and pattern and biochemical pregnancy, the pregnancyoutcome was retrospectively analysed in 81 patients undergoingovulation induction evaluated by vaginal ultrasound on the dayof human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration or luteinizinghormone (LH) surge. Biochemical pregnancies occurred in 7/32(21.9%) pregnancies when endometrial thickness was <9 mm,compared to 0/49 when endometrial thickness was 9 mm on theday of HCG administration or LH surge (P < 0.0025). Clinicalabortions occurred in 5/32 (15.6%) pregnancies when endometrialthickness was 6–8 mm, compared to 6/49 (12.2%) when endometrialthickness was 6–8 mm (NS). Endometrial thickness was relatedto the cycle day of HCG or LH surge (r = 0.37, P < 0.001)but was unrelated to oestradiol level on the day of HCG administrationor LH surge (r = 0.12). Biochemical pregnancies were relatedto endometrial pattern (r = – 0.22, P = 0.02) but wereunrelated to maternal age or previous abortions. Clinical abortionswere related to age (r = 0.26, P = 0.01) and to previous abortion(r = 0.25, P = 0.013) but were unrelated to endometrial pattern.Neither biochemical pregnancy nor clinical abortion was relatedto oestradiol or LH levels on the day of HCG administrationor LH surge. These findings suggest that the majority of biochemicalpregnancies do not result from karyotypically abnormal embryos,as do clinical abortions.     

Revival of the natural cycles in in-vitro fertilization with the use of a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix): a pilot study with minimal stimulation

Natural cycles were abandoned in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) embryo transfer, due to premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges--and subsequent high cancellation rates. In this study, we investigated the administration of a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix) in the late follicular phase of natural cycles in patients undergoing IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A total of 44 cycles from 33 healthy women [mean age 34.1 +/- 1.4 (range 26-36) years] were monitored, starting on day 8 by daily ultrasound and measurement of serum concentrations of oestradiol, LH, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and progesterone. When plasma oestradiol concentrations reached 100-150 pg/ml, with a lead follicle between 12-14 mm diameter, a single injection (s.c.) of 0.5 mg (19 cycles) or 1 mg (25 cycles) Cetrorelix was administered. Human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG; 150 IU) was administered daily at the time of the first injection of Cetrorelix, and repeated thereafter until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Four out of 44 cycles were cancelled (9.0%). No decline in follicular growth or oestradiol secretion was observed after Cetrorelix administration. A total of 40 oocyte retrievals leading to 22 transfers (55%) was performed. In 10 cycles (25%), no oocyte was obtained. Fertilization failure despite ICSI occurred in six cycles (15%). In two patients the embryo was arrested at the 2 pronuclear (PN) stage. The stimulation was minimal (4.7 +/- 1.4 HMG ampoules). A total of seven clinical pregnancies was obtained (32.0% per transfer, 17.5% per retrieval), of which five are ongoing. Thus, a spontaneous cycle and the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix in single dose administration could represent a first-choice IVF treatment with none of the complications and risks of current controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols, and an acceptable success rate.     

Triggering of ovulation in human menopausal gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles: comparison between intravenously administered gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (100 and 500 {micro}g), GnRH agonist (buserelin, 500 {micro}g) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (10 000 IU)

We studied the peri-ovulatory and luteal phases in 38 humanmenopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)-stimulated cycles, in which ovulationwas triggered with four different i.v. bolus ovulation triggers:100 µg gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH; group A,n = 9), 500 µg GnRH agonist (GnRHa; group B, n = 10),10 000IU human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; group C, n = 10)and 500 µg GnRH (group D, n = 9). Endogenous luteinizinghormone (LH) surges occurred in all cycles of groups A, B andD. The rise was slowest but highest in group B (P < 0.0001)and lowest in group A. Although the t₀ serum oestradiol valueswere similar in all groups, day +8 oestradiol and day +4 and+8 progesterone concentrations were higher in group C (P <0.05). At day +4 and +8, serum LH concentrations were lowest(P < 0.01) but follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrationswere higher. Clinically, day +8 luteal scores showed a moreconspicuous degree of ovarian hyperstimulation in the HCG group(P = 0.0292). Luteal insufficiency, defined as cycles with progesteroneconcentrations of <8 ng/ml, occurred much more frequentlyin groups A, B and D than in group C (day +4: P < 0.0003;day +8: P < 0.0001), despite progesterone supplementation.Three pregnancies (one in group C and two in group D) and onemoderate case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (ina non-conceptional group D cycle) occurred. These findings showthat (i) ovulation occurs and pregnancy can be achieved followingan endogenous LH surge induced by GnRH and its agonists, (ii)a high frequency of luteal insufficiency occurs in such cycleseven with luteal supplementation and (iii) OHSS cannot be totallyprevented by this approach, although cycles with an endogenousLH surge in general result in fewer subclinical signs of ovarianhyperstimulation.     

The effects of the somatostatin analogue octreotide on ovulatory performance in women with polycystic ovaries

The elevated luteinizing hormone (LH) and androgen concentrationscharacteristic of women with polycystic ovaries (PCO) are consideredcrucial factors in their infertility. The somatostatin analogueoctreotide lowers LH and androgen concentrations in women withPCO. The effects of octreotide given concurrently with humanmenopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) were therefore compared withthat of HMG alone in 28 infertile women with PCO resistant toclomiphene. In 56 cycles of combined HMG and octreotide therapythere was more orderly follicular growth compared with the multiplefollicular development observed in 29 cycles in which HMG wasgiven alone (mean number of follicles > 15 mm diameter onthe day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration:2.5 ± 0.2 and 3.6 ± 0.4 respectively; P = 0.026).There was a significantly reduced number of cycles abandoned(>4 follicles > 15 mm diameter on day of HCG) in patientstreated with octreotide + HMG, so that HCG had to be withheldin only 5.4% of cycles compared to 24.1% with HMG alone (P <0.05). The incidence of hyperstimulation was also lower on combinedtreatment. Octreotide therapy resulted in a more ‘appropriate’hormonal milieu at the time of HCG injection, with lower LH,oestradiol, androstenedione and insulin concentrations. Althoughgrowth hormone concentration was similar on both regimens, significantlyhigher insulin growth factor-I concentrations were observedon the day of HCG in women on combined therapy than on HMG alone.     

Comparison of LH concentrations in the early and mid-luteal phase in IVF cycles after treatment with HMG alone or in association with the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix

Luteinizing hormone (LH) is mandatory for the maintenance of the corpus luteum. Ovarian stimulation for IVF has been associated with a defective luteal phase. The luteal phases of two groups of patients with normal menstrual cycles and no endocrinological cause of infertility were retrospectively analysed in IVF cycles. Thirty-one infertile patients stimulated with human menopausal gonadotrophins (HMG) for IVF to whom the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist Cetrorelix 0.25 mg was also administered to prevent the LH surge (group I) were compared with 31 infertile patients stimulated with HMG alone (group II). Despite differences in the stimulation outcome, luteal LH serum concentrations were similar in the two groups. LH values dropped from 2.3 +/- 1 IU/l on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration to 1.1 +/- 0.7 IU/l on day HCG +2 in group I (P < 0.0001) and from 5.1 +/- 3 to 1.2 +/- 1.7 IU/l (P < 0.0001) in group II. In the mid-luteal phase, LH concentrations were low in both groups. Our results suggest that suppressed LH concentrations in the early and mid-luteal phase may not be attributed solely to the GnRH-antagonist administration. Pituitary LH secretion may be inhibited by supraphysiological steroid serum concentrations via long-loop feedback and/or by the central action of the exogenously administered HCG via a short-loop mechanism.     

Delayed occurrence of an LH surge after HCG administration during ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins: effect of LHRH treatment

Previous studies have shown the appearance of a spontaneous luteinizing hormone (LH) surge after human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration in human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)/HCG-stimulated menstrual cycles. In this report we investigated the effect of leuprolide acetate, a long-acting luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist, on the occurrence of these post-HCG rises in serum LH. Two groups of patients were included. Group 1: 10 patients receiving HCG as a part of an HMG/HCG protocol for induction of follicular development in an IVF/GIFT program and Group II: 10 patients treated as Group I, but receiving the LHRH agonist leuprolide acetate to inhibit gonadotrophin secretion prior to and during ovarian stimulation. In Group I, none of the patients showed a surge prior to HCG administration. However, an LH surge following HCG treatment was apparent in four patients (40%). Pregnant patients (2/10) had low mean levels (less than or equal to 2.5 mIU/ml LH) in the follicular phase and showed no LH surge after HCG. In Group II, baseline levels of serum LH were reduced significantly (mean, 1.4 +/- 0.1 mIU/ml; P less than 0.001) compared to Group I. No patient showed an LH surge either before or after HCG administration and the occurrence of pregnancy was higher (6/9 transfers) than in Group I. In spite of the differences in pregnancy rates, the combined therapy versus HMG therapy showed no significant difference in number of oocytes collected or serum oestradiol levels. This suggests that high levels of serum LH, whether prior to or after HCG administration, may have a detrimental effect on the establishment of pregnancy despite adequate follicular growth.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Randomized controlled trial of follicle stimulating hormone versus human menopausal gonadotrophin in in-vitro fertilization*

The adverse effect of raised luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrationson reproductive outcome suggests that exogenous LH administrationfor ovarian stimulation may not be desirable. The aim of thisstudy was to compare the clinical pregnancy rates between folliclestimulating hormone (FSH) and human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG) used in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. A total of232 infertile patients, with a mean duration of infertilityof 67.1 ± 32.9 months, were selected for IVF (femaleage <38 years, FSH <15 IU/1, and total motile sperm count>5x10⁶). A short (flare-up) protocol with daily leuprolideacetate was followed randomly from day 3 with FSH (n = 115)or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG; n = 117), at an initialdose of two ampoules per day. A maximum of three embryos wastransferred, and the luteal phase was supported with four dosesof HCG (2500 IU). No differences were observed between the twogroups in any of the cycle response variables except fertilizationrates per oocyte and per patient, both of which were significantlyhigher with FSH. Clinical pregnancy rates per cycle initiated,per oocyte retrieval and per embryo transfer were 19.1, 21.0and 22.7% respectively for FSH, and 12.0, 12.8 and 15.4% respectivelyfor HMG. Whilst these differences were not statistically significant,the results of this interim analysis suggest that HMG may beassociated with a lower clinical pregnancy rate than FSH.     

The effect of progesterone supplementation prior to the induction of ovulation in women treated for in-vitro fertilization

Thirty-one patients superovulated with clomiphene citrate (CC)and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) were given a singleinjection of 25 mg progesterone (P group) 6 h prior to injectionof human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). Levels of urinary andplasma luteinizing hormone (LH) were significantly higher (P<0.001)immediately prior to HCG in the P group compared with thirty-onecontrol patients who had HCG on the same night. Plasma levelsof progesterone remained significantly elevated (P<0.02)for 80 h after injection in the P group, thereafter the levelwas similar to controls. The number of oocytes recovered, fertilizedand replaced per patient was identical in both groups. However,four control patients had no embryos replaced due to failedfertilization. It is concluded that (i) in the majority of Ppatients the timing of ovulation induction by HCG injectionwas appropriate as an LH surge was elicited thus reflectinga physiological stage of readiness, and (ii) elevated plasmaprogesterone levels around the time of oocyte recovery and inthe early luteal phase do not increase the likelihood of theestablishment of pregnancy in patients stimulated for in-vitrofertilization and embryo replacement (TVF/ER) with CC and HMG.     

A double-blind cross-over controlled study to evaluate the effect of human biosynthetic growth hormone on ovarian stimulation in previous poor responders to in-vitro fertilization

The effect of exogenous human biosynthetic growth hormone (HGH;12 IU/day; Norditropin, Novo-Nordisk) on the response to ovarianstimulation using a buserelin/human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG) regimen was assessed in women who had previously showna ‘poor response’ in spite of increasing doses ofHMG. Forty patients were recruited into a prospective double-blindplacebo-controlled study. The serum follicle stimulating hormone(FSH) on day 2–5 of a menstrual cycle (< 10 IU/I) wasused to exclude any peri-menopausal candidates. The urinary24 h GH secretion was normal in all patients. Thirty-three patientscompleted the study with 21 patients having human chorionicgonadotrophin (HCG) in both arms, thus providing a completeset of placebo control data. Of these 21 patients, the administrationof HGH compared to the placebo cycle resulted in increased serumconcentrations of fasting insulin on the 8th (median 3.9 versus5.8 mU/I; P < 0.0005) and13th (median 4.4 versus 5.8 mU/I;P < 0.05) day of HMG in those cycles receiving HGH. After8 days of co-treatment with HGH the number of cohort follicles(14–16.9 mm) was significantly increased, but this changewas not sustained on the day of HCG administration. No statisticaldifference in the serum oestradiol on the 8th day of HMG orday of HCG, length of the follicular phase, total dose of HMGused, or the number of oocytes collected was seen between theplacebo or HGH cycles. This study demonstrates that HGH doesnot improve the ovarian response to ovulation induction in previouspoor responders.     

Subcutaneous low dose leuprolide acetate depot versus leuprolide acetate for women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization

A total of 100 women undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin-releasinghormone agonist (GnRHa) and a human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG) for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) participated in thisrandomized comparative study. Leuprolide acetate at a dose of0.5 mg/day s.c. (n = 52, group I), or low-dose leuprolide acetatedepot at a dose of 1.88 nig s.c. (n = 48, group II), was startedon days 21–23 of the cycle. Stimulation with 225 IU/dayHMG was started after pituitary desensitization had been achieved.The luteal phase was supported by human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG) i.m. injection. There were nostatistical differences inbaseline oestradiol (24.5 ± 4.8 versus 21.9 ±4.5 pg/ml) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations(3.9 ± 1.9 versus 3.2 $ 1.8 mlU/ml), and concentrationson the day of HCG administration of oestradiol (1657 ±245 versus 1512$165 pg/ml), luteinizing hormone (LH; 6.2 ±4.8 versus 5.6 ± 4.3 mlU/ml) and FSH (10.6 ± 2.8versus 10.8 ± 3.6 mIU/ml). There were also no statisticaldifferences in the HMG dosage (26.8 ± 1.8 versus 28.5± 1.5), the number of oocytes retrieved (7.6 ±3.0 versus 8.1 ± 4.3), the number of oocytes fertilized(5.3 ± 2.1 versus 5.6 ± 3.0) and the number ofembryos transferred (3.5 ± 1.3 versus 3.4 ± 1.6).There was no evidence of a premature LH surge in either group,but two patients appeared to have a poor response in the leuprolideacetate group (group I). There were 11 pregnancies (21.2%) afterthe use of leuprolide acetate and 12 pregnancies (25.0%) inthose given leuprolide acetate depot; no statistical differenceexisted between these two groups. Thus, an s.c. low-dose leuprolideacetate depot injection may offer a useful alternative for pituitarysuppression in ovarian stimulation for IVF.     

The effect of human menopausal gonadotrophin and highly purified, urine-derived follicle stimulating hormone on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization in down-regulated normogonadotrophic women

It has been suggested that the luteinizing hormone (LH) activityof human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) preparations used forovarian stimulation in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) may haveadverse effects on reproductive outcome. In the present prospective,randomized trial of 218 infertile couples this notion was investigated.A total of 114 women were treated with Pergonal (HMG group)and 104 with Fertinorm HP (HP-FSH group). The two groups werecomparable with regard to duration of infertility, cause ofinfertility, age and number of previous IVF attempts and allhad normal basal gonadotrophin concentrations before treatmentwas started. A standard hormonal treatment consisting of pituitarydown-regulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue(GnRHa) for 14 days starting on cycle day 21, followed by eitherHMG or highly purified follicle stimulating hormone (HP-FSH),three ampoules (225 IU) per day for 7 days, was used in allcases. The daily hormone dose was thereafter individualizedaccording to the ovarian response. A maximum of two pre-embryoswere transferred after 3 days of culture. Luteal support withprogesterone (300 mg per day intravaginally) was used in allcases. Serum concentrations of oestradiol, FSH and LH were measuredon days 1 and 8 of stimulation and on the day of oocyte retrieval.The mean number of days of stimulation, mean number of ampoulesof HMG or HP-FSH used, mean total motile sperm count on theday of oocyte retrieval and mean numbers of oocytes retrieved(13.4 versus 13.7) or pre-embryos transferred (1.8 versus 1.8)were similar for both groups. Significantly (P < 0.05) morecycles in the HP-FSH group (17 = 16%) were cancelled due tocomplete failure of fertilization than in the HMG group (7 =6%). The mean fertilization rate was significantly (P < 0.05)higher in the HMG group (56%) than in the HP-FSH group (50%),and significantly more transferable pre-embryos were obtainedin the HMG than in the HP-FSH group (mean: 4.0 versus 3.2; P< 0.01). Serum hormone concentrations were similar in thetwo groups on stimulation day 1, but differed significantlywith regard to FSH, LH and oestradiol on stimulation day 8.The clinical outcome was similar in the two groups, with anongoing pregnancy rate (>12 weeks of gestation) per startedcycle of 33% in the HMG group and 29% in the HP-FSH group. Theclinical abortion rates were similar(10 and 14%), and the implantationrate was 30% in each group. In conclusion, no detrimental effectof the LH activity of HMG on the clinical outcome of IVF inGnRHa down-regulated normogonadotrophic women was found. Tothe contrary, some beneficial effects of HMG on fertilizationrates and pre-embryo development as compared with HP-FSH weredemonstrated. These effects, as well as the differences in serumhormone concentrations during ovarian stimulation, may be causedby differences in LH content and/or in the composition of FSHisoforms of the HMG and HP-FSH preparations.     

Assessment of serum luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation with gonadortrophins

An immunoradiometrte assay (IRMA), using monoclonal antibodieswith high affinity for human luteinizing hormone (HLH), wasevaluated for quantitative measurement of serum LH after humanchorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration in patients undergoingstimulation of multiple folh'cular development. Compared toa radioimmunoassay (RIA) commonly used to monitor serum LH,LH IRMA was more effective by several orders of magnitude indiscriminating between HLH and HCG and showed no crossreactivityat HCG concentrations normally found in serum after hormonetreatment. Assays of serum samples obtained from 10 patientsreceiving HCG as part of an HMG/HCG protocol to induce ovulationfor IVF/GIFT also demonstrated that RIA values were greatlyaffected by exogenous HCG. It was estimated that 17–32%of serum HCG was measured as serum LH in RIA. In contrast, determinationsof serum LH by IRMA was not biased by exogenous HCG. Data fromIRMA indicated that eight of the 10 patients showed a significantrise in LH secretion, relative to mean baselines, at either12 or 36 h after adminstration. In one patient the rise hadalready occurred before HCG administration. When an LH riseoccurred, either before or after HCG injection, mean valueswere 2to 9fold higher than those of baseline levels. Assumingthat LH rises > 12 mlU/ml may relate to an endogenous surgeof LH, none of the patients showed a surge prior to HCG administration.On the contrary, the occurrence of an ‘LH surge’after HCG was apparent in four patients. These data demonstratethe application of monoclonal antibodies incorporated in anIRMA to study the occurrence of endogenous LH surges duringstimulation of follicular development by gonadotrophins.     

Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation to recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone induced ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist multiple-dose protocol

BACKGROUND: Suppression of endogenous LH production by mid-follicular phase GnRH-antagonist administration in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol using recombinant (rec) FSH preparations void of LH activity may potentially affect ovarian response and the outcome of IVF treatment. The present study prospectively assessed the effect of using a combination of recFSH and recLH on ovarian stimulation parameters and treatment outcome in a fixed GnRH-antagonist multiple dose protocol. METHODS: 127 infertile patients with an indication for IVF or ICSI were recruited and randomized (using sealed envelopes) to receive a starting dose of either 150 IU recFSH (follitropin alpha) or 150 IU recFSH plus 75 IU recLH (lutropin alpha) for ovarian hyperstimulation. GnRH-antagonist (Cetrorelix) 0.25 mg was administered daily from stimulation day 6 onwards up to and including the day of the administration of recombinant HCG (chorion gonadotropin alpha). Gonadotropin dose adjustments were allowed from stimulation day 6 onwards, HCG was administered as soon as three follicles > or =18 mm were present. The primary outcome parameter was treatment duration until administration of HCG. RESULTS: Exogenous LH did not shorten the time necessary to reach ovulation induction criteria. Serum estradiol (E(2)) and LH levels were significantly higher on the day of HCG administration in the recLH-supplemented group (1924.7 +/- 1256.4 vs 1488.3 +/- 824.0 pg/ml, P < 0.03), and 2.1 +/- 1.4 vs 1.4 +/- 1.5 IU/l, P < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Except for higher E(2) and LH levels on the day of HCG administration, no positive trend in favour of additional LH was found as defined by treatment outcome parameters.     

Endocrinology: A comparison of two starting doses of human menopausal gonadotrophin for follicle stimulation in unselected patients for in-vitro fertilization

Ovarian responses and embryology data were compared in patientsundergoing in-vitro fertilization following follicular stimulationusing long course gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue/humanmenopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) in which the initial daily dosewas two (150 IU) or three ampoules (225 IU) maintained for aminimum of 7 days. Group 1 (n = 31; centre A) patients weretreated with a starting dose of two ampoules, while group 2(n = 46; centre A) patients were treated chronologically immediatelybefore group 1 with a starting dose of three ampoules per day.Group 3 (n = 74; centre B) patients were treated with threeampoules per day simultaneously with group 1. There was no differencein the distributions of patient ages or reasons for treatmentbetween the three groups. Group 1 required longer treatmentbefore the plasma oestradiol attained 250 pg/ml than did boththe other groups (group 1, 9.0; group 2, 6.9; group 3, 6.7 days;P < 0.01), and this resulted in a longer follicular phasefor group 1 (mean: 14.5 days compared with 12.7 and 12.8 forgroups 2 and 3 respectively; P < 0.05). The numbers of follicles>16 mm in diameter at human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG)administration and the numbers of eggs and embryos were allsignificantly lower (P < 0.04) in group 1, and cycle cancellationsdue to insufficient ovarian responses were higher (P < 0.02)in group 1. There was no difference in the numbers of ampoulesused, the oestradiol concentration at HCG, the fertilizationand pregnancy rates or the incidence of hyperstimulation syndromein the three groups. The lower starting dose, therefore, yieldedinferior responses without significant reduction in the HMGrequirement.     

Ovarian stimulation with buserelin/HMG/HCG: prospective randomized study of short versus long protocol

The combined administration of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone(GnRH) agonist buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG) was evaluated in 527 cycles (428 patients) of an assistedreproduction programme. All women were randomly allocated accordingto the ovulation induction protocol into two groups: group I(short protocol; 318 cycles) was given buserelin (1 mg/day)intranasally from cycle day 1 and HMG (2 ampoules/day) fromday 3 until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration:group H (long protocol; 209 cycles) was given buserelin (1 mg/day)intranasally from cycle day 1 for at least 14 days and then2 ampoules HMG/day were added, increasing progressively accordingto the ovarian response. The number (mean ± SEM) of folliclesdeveloped was higher in group II than in group I (9.1 ±0.4 versus 7.7 ± 0.3, respectively; P < 0.05). Moreoocytes were retrieved in group II (8.4 ± 0.5) than ingroup I (6.5 ± 0.3) (P < 0.001), as well as more embryos(6.3 ± 0.5 and 4.0 ± 0.3, respectively; P <0.001). Moreover, in group II there was a better correlationbetween oestradiol and the total follicular volume (r = 0.5391)on cycle day 0 compared with group I (r = 0.458), while oestradiolvalues were similar between the two groups. No differences wereobserved in the cancellation rate, fertilization rate and maturityof the oocytes between the two groups. The pregnancy rate pertransfer was slightly better in group II (25.8%) than in groupI (19.4%), but this difference was not significant. More stimulationdays were needed in group II than in group I (11.8 ±0.2 and 10 ± 0.2, respectively) (P < 0.001) and moreHMG ampoules (37.7 ± 1.4 and 27.9 ± 0.1, respectively)(P < 0.001). In conclusion, the administration of the longprotocol is associated with a higher number of follicles developed,oocytes retrieved and embryos obtained, while it seems morepromising concerning the pregnancy rates. Nevertheless, treatmentwith this protocol increases the stimulation days and the numberof HMG ampoules administered and hence the cost.     

Endocrine composition of follicular fluid comparing human chorionic gonadotrophin to a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist for ovulation induction

Concentrations of inhibin, oestradiol and progesterone weredetermined in pre-ovulatory follicular fluid from 16 women undergoingin-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment. A prospectiverandomized design was used such that ovulation was induced ineight women with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) (9000 IU),and in eight women with an endogenous surge of luteinizing hormone(LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) caused by a singleinjection of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa).Inhibin was measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,and oestradiol and progesterone were measured by radioimmunoassay.Concentrations of inhibin and progesterone are significantlyhigher in follicular fluids collected after ovulation inductionwith HCG compared with ovulation induction with GnRHa (P <0.001, P < 0.02, respectively). Concentrations of oestradiolwere similar in the two groups. This study shows that the methodby which ovulation is triggered significantly affects the micro-environmentof the oocyte just prior to ovulation. The results indicatethat HCG causes a prolonged luteotrophic effect well beforeovulation, compared to an endogenous surge of gonadotrophinscaused by GnRHa, and suggest that follicular maturation withan endogenous surge of gonadotrophins may be closer to the naturalcycle than those cycles in which HCG is administered for ovulationinduction. In addition, this study shows that the concentrationsof inhibin and progesterone in follicular fluid may be valuableparameters in assessing the midcycle LH surge requirements forinduction of ovulation.     

Endocrinology: A randomized prospective study of gonadotrophin with or without gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist for treatment of unexplained infertility

The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) incombination with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for ovulationinduction has been advocated for the treatment, particularlyby in-vitro fertilization (IVF) of various types of infertility.The present study was designed to compare the clinical efficacyof HMG alone with a short protocol of GnRHa/HMG for treatmentof unexplained infertility. A total of 91 couples with unexplainedinfertility were randomly assigned to one of two treatments;either HMG with intra-uterine insemination (IUI) (45 patients,62 cycles) or GnRHa/HMG with IUI (46 patients, 69 cycles) treatments.Progesterone concentrations on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG) administration were significantly higher in HMG (1.5 ±0.9 ng/ml) versus GnRHa/HMG (0.8 ± 0.6 ng/ml; P <0.05)cycles. Furthermore, GnRHa suppressed the occurrences ofpremature luteinization (GnRHa/HMG 5.8% and HMG 24.2% respectively).However, there were no significant differences in HMG dose requirements,plasma oestradiol concentrations or follicular development onthe day of HCG administration between the two groups. Nor wereany significant differences found in the pregnancy rates betweenthe two treatment protocols (GnRHa/HMG 13.0% and HMG 11.3% respectively).Our results suggest no beneficial effect of GnRHa/HMG comparedto HMG alone for the treatment of unexplained infertility, basedon pregnancy rates.