Evidence-based medicine in botulinum toxin therapy for cervical dystonia

Early controlled studies of botulinum toxin (BTX) in cervical dystonia were unblinded and indicated that BTX injections are more successful than medication. In this article, the use of botulinum toxin (BTX) in cervical dystonia is reviewed according to evidence-based medicine. To document the efficacy of BTX, there have been a number of prospective, placebo-controlled studies of the use of BTX in cervical dystonia. Most were double-blind, some included videotapes to provide blinded objective assessments. The more recent studies of BTX in cervical dystonia focused on particular issues such as utility of EMG guidance, comparison to anticholinergic treatment, BTX serotype B in BTX type A resistant and non-resistant patients and different dosages. Despite the wealth of data generated with prospective placebo-controlled studies on the effectiveness of BTX in cervical dystonia, there is uncertainty on which outcome measures to use to express the efficacy of treatments for cervical dystonia. Disease specific instruments to measure quality of life in cervical dystonia have not been used so far. Data on the use of BTX for cervical dystonia have long been restricted to small series of patients reflecting exclusively the experience of individual specialized centers.

     

Distant effects of locally injected botulinum toxin: a double-blind study of single fiber EMG changes

We used single fiber electromyography (SFEMG) to study 42 patients who had enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial undertaken to assess the efficacy of botulinum toxin (BTX) injection of neck muscles to treat torticollis. SFEMG in a limb muscle was performed before treatment, 2, and 12 weeks after injection of placebo or BTX. Before treatment, the mean jitter was 26.8 microsec in patients who were to receive BTX, and 25.7 microsec in the placebo group. Two weeks after injection, mean jitter in the group receiving BTX was 43.6 microsec. In the placebo group, it was 26.5 microsec (P = less than .05). Twelve weeks after injection, mean jitter in the BTX group was 35.5; for the placebo group it was 24.5. Fiber density did not change in any patient during the study. There were no remote clinical effects of BTX. Injection of BTX into muscles affected with focal dystonia is a promising and safe treatment, but there are subclinical effects on uninjected muscles.     

Severe dysphagia after botulinum toxin injection for cervical dystonia in multiple system atrophy.

A 71-year-old woman was treated by botulinum toxin (BTX) type A injections for cervical dystonia related to a multiple system atrophy (MSA). A few days later and persisting for the next 4 months, she developed a severe dysphagia, requiring nasogastric feeding. This implicates cautious use of BTX in a case of MSA.     

Tardive and idiopathic oromandibular dystonia: a clinical comparison

OBJECTIVE: Most patients with tardive dystonia have a focal onset involving the cranial-cervical region. Because of its resemblance to idiopathic cranial dystonia, a common form of dystonia, it often poses a diagnostic problem. To compare clinical features and response to botulinum toxin (BTX) injections between patients with tardive and idiopathic oromandibular dystonia (OMD). METHODS: Patients seen in a movement disorder clinic who satisfied the inclusion criteria for tardive or idiopathic OMD were studied. The clinical variables and responses to BTX between the two groups of patients were compared. In the tardive group, we also compared the clinical variables between those with oro-facial-lingual stereotypies, and those without. RESULTS: Twenty four patients with tardive OMD and 92 with idiopathic OMD were studied. There were no differences in the demographic characteristics. Most were women, with duration of symptoms longer than 8 years. The mean duration of neuroleptic exposure was 7.1 (SD 7.9) years. Jaw closure was the most frequent subtype of OMD (tardive=41.7%, idiopathic=51.1%). Idiopathic patients were more likely to have coexistent cervical dystonia (p<0.05), whereas isolated OMD was significantly higher in tardive patients (p<0.05). Limb stereotypies, akathisia, and respiratory dyskinesia were seen only in the tardive OMD. Frequency of oro-facial-lingual stereotypy was significantly higher in the tardive than the idiopathic group (75.0% v 31.5%, p<0.0001). The peak effect of BTX was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oro-facial-lingual stereotypies were significantly more frequent in the tardive than the idiopathic group. Presence of stereotypic movements in the limbs, akathisia, and respiratory dyskinesias in patients with OMD strongly suggests prior neuroleptic exposure. Dystonia in tardive OMD is more likely to be restricted to the oromandibular region, whereas in patients with idiopathic OMD, there is often coexistent cervical dystonia. BTX is equally effective in both groups of patients.     

Treatment of upper limb dystonia with botulinum toxin

The use of botulinum toxin A (BTX A) in upper limb dystonia is gaining increasing acceptance and it has recently been suggested that it be considered as first line treatment.(1) We have reviewed our experience since 1991 of treating 20 cases of upper limb dystonia. 14 patients had task-specific dystonias (6 simple writer's cramp, 5 dystonic writer's cramp, 3 musician's cramp) and 6 had secondary focal or segmental dystonias (4 with early cortico-basal degeneration). All patients had electromyography to both determine and guide muscle selection. Pre- and post-treatment video as well as questionnaires formed the basis for outcome assessment. Botulinum toxin therapy was clearly beneficial in about two-thirds of those with primary upper limb dystonia, a condition affecting young adults (mean onset 32.9 years). In contrast, BTX A was far less effective in secondary upper limb dystonias which occurred in the elderly (mean onset 71.7 years). Optimal treatment strategies are discussed. In conclusion, botulinum toxin is an effective form of treatment for primary upper limb dystonia; its role in late onset secondary dystonia is mainly palliative.     

Polyradiculoneuritis after botulinum toxin therapy for cervical dystonia

A 40-year-old man with cervical dystonia developed an acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuritis after botulinum toxin type A treatment. Some cases of idiopathic brachial plexopathy and polyradiculoneuritis have been reported to date. Although a causal relationship is not firmly established, the clinical temporal profile suggests a pathogenic relationship. In patients with cervical dystonia, further use of type A botulinum toxin should be considered contraindicated, and the use of another type of botulinum toxin should be taken into consideration.     

Low-dose botulinum toxin-a treatment of cervical dystonia - a double-blind,randomized pilot study

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of low-dose botulinum toxin (BTX) treatment of cervical dystonia in a double-blind, randomized pilot study. Thirty-one patients with cervical dystonia and a minimum of 2 previous Dysport treatments received either a mean total target dose of 547 +/- 113 mouse units (MU) (group A, 500 MU Dysport/ml) or a 4-times-diluted preparation 130 +/- 32 MU (group B, 125 MU Dysport/ml). Assessment was made before and 4 weeks after the injection using Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scales (TWSTRS). Additionally, a self-response scale evaluated the patients' subjective condition for 12 weeks after injection. TWST rating before and after injection revealed comparable clinical improvement in both groups. The severity of cervical dystonia at study entry had no effects on therapeutic effects of either preparation. Self-rating revealed comparable subjective improvement in both groups; however, 3 patients of group B received reinjections due to insufficient effects of the injection. Our findings suggest that low-dose treatment of cervical dystonia with Dysport may be clinically effective during maintenance therapy, at least for a limited period of time. Long-lasting effects of previous Dysport treatments at conventional doses and possibly improved diffusion of a highly diluted toxin preparation may have contributed to the effects of the low-dose regimen. Our data emphasize the need for further studies in order to clearly identify optimal toxin preparations for therapeutic uses of BTX-A in neurologic disorders.     

Long-term efficacy of botulinum toxin A in treatment of various movement disorders over a 10-year period.

Although botulinum toxin A (BTX) has been licensed in Canada for treatment of various movement disorders since 1990, few clinical studies regarding its long-term efficacy and side effects have been reported. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 235 patients who received BTX from our movement disorders clinic over a 10-year period (January 1990 to December 1999). A total of 2,616 treatment cycles (multiple injections) were administered to 235 patients with cervical dystonia (CD), hemifacial spasm (HS), blepharospasm (BP), and other movement disorders. Substantial benefit at 5 years was seen in most patients (90% in BP, 88% in HS, 63% in CD, 100% in jaw closing and lower limb dystonia, and 56% in writer's cramp). Benefit was maintained for up to 10 years in CD, HS, and BP data, with a 75.8% benefit reported. Twenty-eight percent of patients discontinued treatment during the follow-up period due to a variety of reasons. Of these, 9.1% of patients developed primary resistance, and 7.5% of patients secondary resistance. Adverse effects, mostly minor, developed in 27% of patients at any one time, occurring over 4.5% of treatment cycles. These were most frequently reported in blepharospasm (22 of 36 patients in 40 cycles), followed by hemifacial spasm (21 of 70 patients in 46 cycles), and cervical dystonia (17 of 106 in 28 cycles). Only 1.3% of patients discontinued therapy due intolerable adverse effects. The results show that BTX is a safe and effective treatment of various types of movement disorders, and most side effects are well tolerated. Discontinuation for any reason was also low after 5 years. Efficacy was maintained after long periods of treatment with high degree of patient satisfaction.     

Botulinum toxin and neuromotor rehabilitation: An integrated approach to idiopathic cervical dystonia.

Currently, the best treatment option for idiopathic cervical dystonia (ICD) is injection of botulinum toxin (BTX) into the affected muscles, whereas rehabilitative approaches have given disappointing results. We evaluated whether the association of an ad hoc rehabilitative program may improve the clinical efficacy of BTX treatment in a single-center, cross-over, controlled study. Forty patients with ICD were randomly assigned to two different treatment groups: (1) BTX type A (BTX-A) plus a specific program of physical therapy (BTX-PT) or (2) BTX-A alone (BTX-0). Patients in the BTX-PT group showed a longer duration of the clinical benefit (118.8 vs. 99.1 days) and needed a lower dose of BTX at reinjection (284.5 vs. 325.5 units). In addition, they showed more marked reductions in their disability in activities of daily living (-9.7 vs. -4.85 points) and subjective pain (-13.35 vs. 6.95 points) scores. Association of BTX-A therapy with a specific program of physical therapy may improve ICD treatment outcome.     

Long-term follow-up of cervical dystonia patients treated with botulinum toxin A.

We followed the course in 100 consecutive patients with cervical dystonia (CD) after they were initially treated with botulinum toxin (BTX) in the form of Dysport 10 to 12 years ago. A total of 4 patients had died, and 6 were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 90 patients, 57 (63%) were still treated with BTX. In the patients treated at one centre over the whole period with Dysport, mean dose used during each treatment session was 833 (SD +/- 339) units Dysport with a cumulative dose of 20,943 (SD +/- 9462) units Dysport over a mean of 26.8 (SD +/- 8.6) treatment cycles. Secondary nonresponse was detected in 3 of the 90 patients. During follow-up, 12 patients developed blepharospasm, 13 oromandibular dystonia, and 17 patients writer's cramp. We conclude that BTX remains effective and safe for approximately 60% of CD patients for more than 10 years.     

Treatment of hip adductor spasticity with botulinum toxin type B

For the treatment of focal spasticity using botulinum toxin, only studies using type A have been published.Botulinum toxin type B (Neurobloc) is registered for cervical dystonia, but there is increasing interest in ist effectiveness for treating other diseases. Four patients, each with seriously disabling hip adductor spasticity of different origins, were treated with botulinum toxin type B following the failure of other therapeutic options.Total doses of 10,000 IU to 22,000 IU were injected bilaterally into the hip adductor muscles. A reduction in muscle tone or painful spasms was observed in all patients within 2 weeks, leading to an improvement in gait and increased ease of nursing care. Therefore, botulinum toxin type B may be a more cost-effective treatment for hip adductor spasticity than botulinum toxin type A.     

Accurate targeting of botulinum toxin injections: how to and why

Botulinum toxin (BTX), the exotoxin of the obligate anaerobe, Clostridium botulinum, is used to ameliorate pain and treat conditions associated with glandular, smooth and skeletal muscle overactivity. The benefits derived from the injection of BTX may be negated by unintended weakness of uninjected muscles. Performance of BTX injections may be facile, requiring only surface marking or clinical-localisation techniques but may be more technically demanding, necessitating the use of equipment, such as electromyography (EMG) or ultrasonography (U/S). Less often, endoscopic, fluoroscopic or computed tomographic (CT) guidance may be required. Despite evidence to support the efficacy of BTX injections in treating many conditions, there is no evidence to support the superiority of any one injection technique over needle localisation using surface anatomy. This is possibly due to the lack of well-designed controlled studies, that is, current studies are hampered by small patient numbers, lack of consistency of injection technique and the application of different rating scales. Intuitively, certain injection techniques are more suited to injection of specific muscles or conditions, for example, U/S or passive-monitoring EMG should be used to treat cervical dystonia, active-monitoring EMG applied for strabismus injections, whereas either active-monitoring EMG or endoscopy is indicated when giving BTX for spasmodic dysphonia. Finally, electrical-stimulation EMG or U/S (or a combination of both) would be most suitable when injecting the forearm muscles for spasticity or writer's cramps.     

Botulinum toxin A in patients with oromandibular dystonia: long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin A (BTX) in patients with oromandibular dystonia (OMD) and to compare the treatment results of the various subtypes of OMD. BACKGROUND: OMD is one of the most challenging forms of dystonia to treat. Pharmacologic therapies are generally not effective, and there are no surgical alternatives. METHODS: Of 202 patients diagnosed clinically to have OMD in a movement disorders clinic over a period of 10 years, 162 patients satisfied the study inclusion criteria. The masseters and submentalis complex were the only two muscle groups injected with BTX in this group of patients. RESULTS: The mean age was 57.9+/-15.3 years and the mean follow-up period was 4.4+/-3.8 years. More than half the patients had jaw-closing (JC) dystonia. A total of 2,529 BTX treatments were administered into the masseter muscles, submentalis complex, or both during a total of 1,213 treatment visits. The mean doses of BTX (per side) were 54.2+/-15.2 U for the masseters and 28.6+/-16.7 U for the submentalis complex. The mean total duration of response was 16.4+/-7.1 weeks. The mean global effect of BTX was 3.1+/-1.0 (range, 0 to 4, where 4 equals the complete abolition of the dystonia), with the JC dystonia patients responding best. Fifty-one patients (31.5%) reported adverse effects with BTX in at least one visit. Complications such as dysphagia and dysarthria were reported in 135 (11.1%) of all treatment visits. CONCLUSIONS: BTX is a safe and effective long-term treatment for OMD. JC dystonia responds better than jaw-opening or mixed dystonias, and the treatment of the latter types of OMD are more likely associated with dysphagia and dysarthria. Jaw-opening dystonia can be treated successfully by injecting the submentalis complex.     

Botulinum toxin as treatment for focal dystonia: a systematic review of the pharmaco-therapeutic and pharmaco-economic value

Focal dystonia is a common, invalidating neurologic condition characterized by involuntary, sustained muscle contractions causing twisting movements and abnormal postures in one body part. Currently, botulinum toxin is the treatment of first choice. We performed a systematic review towards the pharmaco-therapeutic and pharmaco-economic value of botulinum toxin as treatment for focal dystonia, which yielded the following results. Botulinum toxin is the most effective treatment for reducing dystonic symptoms measured with dystonia-specific and general questionnaires, and pain in patients with focal dystonia. Seventy-one percent of patients with cervical dystonia had a reduction in neck pain compared to 12?% in placebo groups. Adverse events occur in 58?% of patients during treatment with botulinum toxin compared to 46?% treated with placebo. Especially dry mouth, neck weakness, dysphagia, and voice changes are common. Adverse events are usually mild and self-limiting. Health-related quality of life, measured with the SF-36 is 20?C50 points lower in patients with focal dystonia compared to controls and the effect of botulinum toxin on health-related quality of life is unclear. Botulinum toxin treatment is expensive because the drug itself is expensive. Yearly costs for treating a patient with focal dystonia with botulinum toxin range from EUR 347 to EUR 3,633 and the gain in QALYs with BTX treatment is small. Focal dystonia impairs the productivity and the ability to work. At start of botulinum toxin treatment only 47?C50?% was working. Botulinum toxin partly improves this. Overall, we conclude that botulinum toxin is an expensive drug with good effects. From a societal perspective, the costs may well weigh up to the regained quality of life. However, the available literature concerning costs, health-related quality of life and labor participation is very limited. An extensive cost-effectiveness study should be performed incorporating all these aspects.     

Efficacy of pharmacological treatment of dystonia: evidence-based review including meta-analysis of the effect of botulinum toxin and other cure options

The treatment of both generalized and focal dystonia is symptomatic. There is no evidence-based information about the efficacy of the different methods of the pharmacological therapeutic options currently being applied in dystonia. The specific questions addressed by this study were which treatments for dystonia have proven efficacy and which of them have unproven results. Following evidence-based principles, a literature review based on MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library, augmented by manual search of the most important journals was performed to identify the relevant publications issued between 1973 and 2003. All articles appearing in the professional English literature, including case reports, were considered. In the presence of comparable studies the meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled information and make a reasonable inference. Based on this review, we conclude: (i) botulinum toxin has obvious benefit (level A, class I-II evidence) for the treatment of cervical dystonia and blepharospasm; (ii) trihexyphenidyl in high dosages is effective for the treatment of segmental and generalized dystonia in young patients (level A, class I-II evidence); (iii) all other methods of pharmacological intervention for generalized or focal dystonia, including botulinum toxin injections, have not been confirmed as being effective according to accepted evidence-based criteria (level U, class IV studies).     

Comparison of efficacy and immunogenicity of original versus current botulinum toxin in cervical dystonia

The authors compared 130 patients treated for cervical dystonia with original botulinum toxin (BTX) type A (Botox; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA), 42 of whom were exposed only to the original BTX type A used before 1998 (25 ng protein/100 units), and 119 treated only with the current BTX type A (5 ng of protein/100 units). Blocking antibodies were detected in 4 of 42 (9.5%) patients treated only with original BTX type A but in none of the 119 patients treated exclusively with current BTX type A (p < 0.004). The current preparation decreased the risk of antibody formation by a factor of six. The authors conclude that the low risk of antibody formation after current BTX type A treatment is related to lower protein load.     

Efficacy and safety of a new bulk toxin of botulinum toxin in cervical dystonia: a blinded evaluation

We investigated the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin A (BTX) manufactured from a new bulk strain for the treatment of cervical dystonia. This was a single-blinded retrospective comparison of length of benefit, subjective improvement, and complications of treatment in 50 patients treated with the old form of toxin designated 79-11 and the new toxin strain BCB2024. The mean duration of benefit of the 79-11 strain and the BCB2024 strain were the same. Subjective efficacy, measured on a -4 to +4 scale, demonstrated no difference between the two strains. Dysphagia occurred in 12% of patients injected with the 79-11 strain and 14% of subjects injected with the BCB2024 strain. We also used a clinician's global assessment that incorporated the duration of benefit, subjective efficacy, and complications as a secondary analysis. There was no significant difference between the two forms of botulinum toxin A according to this scale. We conclude that the 79-11 strain and the BCB2024 strain offer similar peak efficacy duration of benefit, and adverse events.     

Efficacy and Safety of Long-term Botulinum Toxin Treatment in Craniocervical Dystonia: A Systematic Review

Botulinum neurotoxins have been shown to be a safe and effective therapeutic option for most forms of focal dystonia, and are now considered to provide the best symptomatic treatment in these disorders. However, only a few papers addressed the long-term efficacy and safety of repeated treatments with this drug. This article reviews the data from clinical trials that have assessed the long-term results of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) and type B in the treatment of the different forms of focal craniocervical dystonia, cervical dystonia (CD), blepharospasm, oromandibular, and laryngeal dystonia. Studies on the long-term effects of BoNT-A therapy have demonstrated that the majority of patients comply with this repeated treatment because they experience a positive and stable effect over time. It is still unclear whether in patients with focal dystonia the mean dose of BoNT-A changes over time. In spite of the wide spectrum of side effects reported to be associated with BoNT-A treatment, there is no evidence of specific side effects due exclusively to the long-term use of such drugs. The only exception to these positive long-term findings is the occurrence of a subgroup of patients with CD who fail to maintain a sustained response after the first or second effective treatment, partly owing to the development of neutralizing antibodies against the toxin. Longitudinal studies aimed at defining the risk factors for this abnormal pattern of response to botulinum toxin treatment are currently being conducted.     

Generalised muscular weakness after botulinum toxin injections for dystonia: a report of three cases

Three patients are reported on who developed transient generalised weakness after receiving therapeutic doses of botulinum toxin for cervical dystonia (one case) and symptomatic hemidystonia (two cases) respectively. Clinical and electrophysiological findings were in keeping with mild botulism. All patients had received previous botulinum toxin injections without side effects and one patient continued injections without recurrence of generalised weakness. The cause is most likely presynaptic inhibition due to systemic spread of the toxin. Patients with symptomatic dystonia may be more likely to have this side effect and botulinum toxin injections in these patients should be carried out cautiously.     

Current status and prospects of medical therapy for dystonia]

The goal of medical therapy for primary dystonia is conservative. While botulinum toxin (BTX) therapy is a first choice for blepharospasm and cervical dystonia, medical therapy is selected as such for other types of dystonia. As oral medications, trihexyphenidyl and benzodiazepines are most frequently used. Muscle relaxants are also commonly used, but dopamine antagonists are not recommended because of the risk of inducing tardive dyskinesia. For childhood-onset generalized dystonia, levodopa should be considered to rule out levodopa-responsive dystonia. Mexiletine is reported to be effective not only for bleharospasm and cervical dystonia but for focal limb dystonia. To improve the therapeutic performance of BTX therapy for blepharospasm, it is recommended that corrugator supercilii and procerus muscles, as well as orbicularis oculi muscle, be added as target muscles. To improve the therapeutic performance of BTX therapy for cervical dystonia, it is recommended that this therapy be started as early as possible, especially within one year of illness, and that levator scapulae muscle be added as target if necessary. To improve usefulness of medical therapy for dystonia, its strategy must be standardized, and more useful therapies must be positively adopted. Algorithm for treatment of dystonia must also be established and generalized.