A statewide initiative to improve the care of hospitalized pneumonia patients: The Connecticut Pneumonia Pathway Project

PURPOSE: A statewide quality improvement initiative was conducted in Connecticut to improve process-of-care performance and to decrease length of stay for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. SETTING AND METHODS: Data were collected on 1,242 elderly (> or =65 years) pneumonia patients hospitalized at 31 of 32 acute care hospitals between January 16, 1995, and March 15, 1996, and on 1,146 patients hospitalized between January 1, 1997, and June 30, 1997. Interventions included feedback of performance data (Qualidigm, the Connecticut Peer Review Organization), dissemination of an evidence-based pneumonia critical pathway (Connecticut Thoracic Society), and sharing of pathway implementation experiences (hospitals). Process and outcome measures included early antibiotic administration, blood culture collection, oxygenation assessment, length of stay, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission rates. Analyses were adjusted for severity of illness and hospital-specific practice patterns. RESULTS: After the statewide initiative, improvements were noted in antibiotic administration within 8 hours of hospital arrival (improvement from 83.4% to 88.8%, relative risk [RR] = 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10 to 1.32), oxygenation assessment within 24 hours of hospital arrival (93.6% to 95.4%; RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.38), and length of stay (7 days to 5 days, P <0.001). There were no significant changes in blood culture collection within 24 hours of hospital arrival, blood culture collection before antibiotic administration, 30-day mortality, or 30-day readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: Statewide improvements were demonstrated in the care of hospitalized pneumonia patients concurrent with a multifaceted quality improvement intervention. Further research is needed to separate the effects of the quality improvement interventions from secular trends.     

Misdiagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia and inappropriate utilization of antibiotics: side effects of the 4-h antibiotic administration rule

BACKGROUND: The 2003 Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) recommend the initiation of antibiotic therapy within 4 h of hospitalization. This quality indicator has been linked to the incentive compensation of third-party payers to hospitals. We evaluated the impact of this recommendation on the diagnosis of CAP and the utilization of antibiotics. METHODS: All patients with a hospital admission diagnosis of CAP before publication of the guidelines (January to June 2003) and after publication of the guidelines (January-June 2005) were included. We collected data on clinical signs and symptoms on presentation, chest radiograph findings, blood cultures prior to therapy with antibiotics, time to antibiotic administration, pneumonia severity index (PSI) score, confusion, urea, respiratory rate, BP, and age >or= 65 years (CURB-65), and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 518 patients were included in the study. More patients in 2005 had a hospital admission diagnosis of CAP without radiographic abnormalities compared to 2003 (2005, 91 patients [28.5%]; 2003, 41 patients [20.6%]; p = 0.04), and more patients received antibiotics within 4 h of triage (2005, 210 patients [65.8%]; 2003, 107 patients [53.8%]; p = 0.007). Blood cultures prior to antibiotic administration increased (2005, 220 patients [69.6%]; 2003, 93 patients [46.7%]; p < 0.001). However, the final diagnosis of CAP dropped to 58.9% in 2005 from 75.9% in 2003 (p < 0.001). The mean (+/- SD) antibiotic utilization per patient increased to 1.66 +/- 0.54 in 2005 compared to 1.39 +/- 0.58 in 2003 (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in PSI or CURB-65 scores, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Linking antibiotic administration within 4 h of hospital admission (as a quality indicator) to financial compensation may result in an inaccurate diagnosis of CAP, inappropriate utilization of antibiotics, and thus less than optimal care.     

Process of care performance, patient characteristics, and outcomes in elderly patients hospitalized with community-acquired or nursing home-acquired pneumonia

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare process of care performance, patient characteristics, and outcomes in a contemporary cohort of elderly (> or = 65 years) patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) or with nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP). DESIGN: State-wide retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Thirty-four acute-care hospitals in Connecticut. PATIENTS: Elderly Medicare patients hospitalized in 1995-1996 with CAP (1,131) or with NHAP (528). MEASUREMENTS: Antibiotic administration within 8 h of hospital arrival, blood culture collection within 24 h of hospital arrival, oxygenation assessment within 24 h of hospital arrival, demographic and clinical characteristics, in-hospital complications, mortality, and length of stay. RESULTS: Process of care performance rates for patients with CAP and NHAP were equivalent for antibiotic administration within 8 h of hospital arrival (76.8% vs 76.3%, respectively; p = 0.82), blood culture collection within 24 h of hospital arrival (78.1% vs 81.1%, respectively; p = 0.31), and oxygenation assessment within 24 h of hospital arrival (94.7% vs 95. 3%, respectively; p = 0.70). Patients with CAP were younger than those with NHAP (median age, 80 vs 84 years, respectively; p < 0. 001), had less cerebrovascular disease (16.8% vs 34.7%, respectively; p < or = 0.001), and lower mortality risk scores at hospital presentation (median, 100 vs 137, respectively; p < or = 0. 001) than patients with NHAP. The median length of stay was equivalent (7 days), but the in-hospital mortality rate was lower in patients with CAP than in patients with NHAP (8.0% vs 18.6%, respectively; p < or = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Initial hospital processes of care are performed at the same rate in patients hospitalized with CAP or NHAP. However, patients with CAP are younger, are less acutely and chronically ill, and have lower in-hospital mortality rates than patients with NHAP.     

Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in a population-based study: Link between etiology and patients characteristics, process-of-care, clinical evolution and outcomes

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The etiologic profile of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) for each age group could be similar among inpatients and outpatients. This fact brings up the link between etiology of CAP and its clinical evolution and outcome. Furthermore, the majority of pneumonia etiologic studies are based on hospitalized patients, whereas there have been no recent population-based studies encompassing both inpatients and outpatients. METHODS: To evaluate the etiology of CAP, and the relationship among the different pathogens of CAP to patients characteristics, process-of-care, clinical evolution and outcomes, a prospective population-based study was conducted in Spain from April 1, 2006, to June 30, 2007. Patients (age >18) with CAP were identified through the family physicians and the hospital area. RESULTS: A total of 700 patients with etiologic evaluation were included: 276 hospitalized and 424 ambulatory patients. We were able to define the aetiology of pneumonia in 55.7% (390/700). The most frequently isolated organism was S. pneumoniae (170/390, 43.6%), followed by C. burnetti (72/390, 18.5%), M. pneumoniae (62/390, 15.9%), virus as a group (56/390, 14.4%), Chlamydia species (39/390, 106%), and L. pneumophila (17/390, 4.4%). The atypical pathogens and the S. pneumoniae are present in pneumonias of a wide spectrum of severity and age. Patients infected by conventional bacteria were elderly, had a greater hospitalization rate, and higher mortality within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides information about the etiology of CAP in the general population. The microbiology of CAP remains stable: infections by conventional bacteria result in higher severity, and the S. pneumoniae remains the most important pathogen. However, atypical pathogens could also infect patients in a wide spectrum of severity and age.     

Evaluation of outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia: a guide for patients,physicians, and policy-makers

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a key target for research and quality improvement in acute medicine. However, many of the outcome measures used in prognostic and antibiotic studies are not validated and do not capture features of outcome that are important to patients. Substitutes for traditional outcome measures include a recently validated patient-based symptom questionnaire (the CAP-Sym) and process-of-care measures. The interpretation of outcomes also depends on the quality of the study design and methods used. This paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of outcome, process-of-care, and economic measures in CAP and the interpretation of these measures in randomised and observational studies. A core set of measures for use in clinical CAP research and performance measurement is proposed.     

Utility of blood cultures in community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization: influence of antibiotic treatment before admission.

It has been previously shown that antibiotics given before hospitalization significantly reduce the proportion of positive blood cultures in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The aim of this prospective study was to compare the utility and cost-benefits of blood cultures in patients, hospitalized for moderate CAP, who had or had not received antibiotic therapy prior to admission. During 1 year, 53 patients were included and separated into two groups: group 1 patients had not received antibiotic treatment prior to admission (n = 30), whereas group 2 patients had been treated with antibiotics (n = 23). Within the first 48 hours, a set of blood cultures was collected if the body temperature was higher than 38.5 degrees C or in the case of shaking chills. A total of 136 blood cultures was collected; 74 in group 1 and 62 in group 2. Bacteraemia was significantly more frequent in group 1 than in group 2, 5/30 patients vs. 0/23, respectively (P < 0.05). The cost of negative blood cultures was valued at 13,939.2 FF in group 1 and 13,164.8 FF in group 2, respectively 464.6 +/- 244.3 FF and 569.3 +/- 233.4 FF per patient (n.s.). Moreover, blood cultures were the method of diagnosis in only one of the five patients with bacteraemia and in no case did a positive blood-culture result influence the initial therapeutic regime. Thus, our results suggest a reduced clinical utility and cost-benefit of blood cultures in patients hospitalized for moderate CAP who have received an antibiotic treatment prior to admission.     

Implementation of admission decision support for community-acquired pneumonia

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Considerable variation exists in hospital admission rates for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Logic to determine need for admission has been proposed by several authors. We compared Intermountain Health Care pneumonia guideline recommendations for inpatient vs outpatient care with actual physician decision making and clinical outcomes before vs after implementation. A secondary objective was to determine whether the pneumonia severity index predicts need for admission in this population. DESIGN: Prospective study after implementation vs historic controls. SETTING: Four ambulatory, urgent-care facilities. PATIENTS: Four hundred sixty-three immunocompetent adults with radiographically confirmed community-acquired pneumonia. INTERVENTION: A pneumonia practice guideline including decision support logic was implemented for a 12-month period. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: After implementation, physicians used the pneumonia guideline form in 90% of cases. The percentage of patients admitted within 30 days decreased from 13.6% to 6.4% (p = 0.01). Only five patients before (2.5%) and three patients after (1.1%, p = 0.3) guideline implementation required subsequent hospital admission within 30 days after initial outpatient treatment. Only two deaths occurred in the study cohort, both outpatients before implementation. The positive predictive value was 14.4%, and the negative predictive value for admission was 98.8% after guideline implementation. Guideline recommendation for admission was more likely to be followed in patients with more risk factors and hypoxemia. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased admission rate was observed after implementation of admission decision support in combination with specific recommendations for outpatient antibiotic therapy. Favorable outpatient outcomes suggest that implementation of decision support was safe.     

Management of community-acquired pneumonia and secular trends at different hospitals

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess variability in the management of patients admitted to hospitals with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), and changes in secular trends of this condition. METHODS: Observational study carried out, in 5 teaching hospitals, in northern Spain of patients admitted with CAP between March 1,1998 and March 1,1999 (baseline period), and between March 1, 2000 and September 30, 2001 (follow-up period). Clinical histories were analyzed retrospectively for relevant parameters for process-of-care and outcome performance. Those parameters among hospitals during the baseline period were compared. For each hospital, changes in these parameters between baseline and follow-up were also measured. All parameters were adjusted for disease severity. RESULTS: A total of 844 patients were included in the baseline period, and 654 in the follow-up period. During the baseline period, adjusted analyses revealed statistically significant differences in all process-of-care parameters except the coverage of atypical pathogens. With regard to clinical outcomes, however, only the 30-day readmission rate was significantly different (P=0.03). Adjusted mean length of stay ranged from 6.3 to 9.2 days (P<0.0001). In adjusted analyses of temporal changes within hospitals for process-of-care and outcome performance, revealed few statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Variability discovered between hospitals in the management of patients in the absence of relevant secular changes in each hospital points out the necessity to implement measures designed to reduce such variability between hospitals and to improve the quality of medical treatment.     

The role of new therapies for severe community-acquired pneumonia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is the most common cause of death from infectious diseases. CAP patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission carry the highest mortality rates. This paper aims to review the current literature regarding epidemiology, risk factors, severity criteria and reasons for admitting the hospitalized patient to the ICU, and the empiric and specific antibiotic therapeutic regimens employed. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple sets of clinical practice guidelines have been published in the past few years addressing the treatment of CAP. The guidelines all agree that CAP patients admitted to the hospital represent a major concern, and appropriate empiric therapy should be instituted to improve clinical outcomes. SUMMARY: The cost, morbidity and mortality of CAP patients requiring ICU admission remain unacceptably high. These are heterogeneous groups of patients, so it is important to use risk-stratification based on clinical parameters and prediction tools. Appropriate antibiotic therapy is an important component in the management of both groups of patients. In particular, it is essential to administer an appropriate antimicrobial agent from the initiation of therapy, so that the risks of treatment failure and the morbidity of CAP may be minimized.     

Influence of prior pneumococcal and influenza vaccination on outcomes of older adults with community-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether prior pneumococcal and seasonal influenza vaccination improves outcomes in older adults hospitalized for community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP). DESIGN: Prospective, observational, multicenter study. SETTING: Five public hospitals providing universal free care to the whole population in three Spanish regions. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older admitted to the hospital with CAP through the emergency department. MEASUREMENTS: Pneumococcal and influenza vaccination status. The primary study outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of hospital stay (LOS), and overall case‐fatality rate. Outcome variables of individuals vaccinated with both vaccines were compared with outcomes of those who were unvaccinated. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty‐eight individuals had received 23‐valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine and seasonal influenza vaccination and were compared with 195 unvaccinated individuals. No differences were found with respect to combined antibiotic therapy between groups (38.0% vs 39.7%; P=.80). Similar percentages of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals required ICU admission (7.2% vs 8.2%; P=.69). Mean LOS was significantly shorter in vaccinated individuals (9.9 vs 12.4 days; P=.04). Overall case‐fatality rates were similar in both groups (5.9% vs 5.1%; P=.73). After adjustment, LOS, risk of ICU admission, and overall case‐fatality rate were not associated with prior pneumococcal and seasonal influenza vaccination. CONCLUSION: The clinical outcomes of vaccinated older adults hospitalized with CAP were not better than those observed in unvaccinated individuals.     

北京市某三甲医院老年社区获得性肺炎住院患者诊治现况调查

目的 调查北京某三甲医院老年社区获得性肺炎( CAP)住院患者的诊治现状,并与中国2016年版《成人社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南》推荐的诊治方案进行对比,探讨诊治过程中存在的问题.方法 选择2020年1月至12月于首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院住院的295例老年CAP患者为研究对象.根据CAP评分量表( CURB-65)...     

Effect of a simple educational intervention on the hospital management of community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Both the speed of commencement and the appropriateness of i.v. antibiotic administration influence outcomes in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). While quality improvement projects have been linked to better CAP management and outcomes, there are limited data evaluating simple and achievable interventions. METHODS: A simple educational programme targeting rapid and appropriate antibiotic administration for the inpatient treatment of CAP was evaluated using a retrospective chart review of all patients admitted through the emergency department with CAP during 'pre-intervention' and 'post-intervention' periods. RESULTS: There were 108 pre-intervention patients (56 women, median age 63 years) and 88 post-intervention patients (43 women, median age 61 years) included in the evaluation. Comparison of indicators of care in the post-intervention period with those in the pre-intervention period showed there were significant changes in: median time to antibiotic administration (2.5 h vs 3.5 h, 95% CI: 0-1.25, P = 0.01); subjects not prescribed macrolide antibiotics (2.3% vs 10.2%, 95% CI for OR 1.02-46.19, P = 0.04); hospital length of stay (3.5 vs 6 days, 95% CI: 1-3, P < 0.001) and mortality (0% vs 6.5%, 95% CI for OR 1.13 to infinity, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: A simple, inexpensive educational intervention was associated with significant improvements in the hospital management of CAP. The widespread introduction of similar programmes has the potential to effect substantial improvements in management, and possibly patient outcomes, and requires prospective confirmation in a larger, randomized sample.     

Pneumonia versus aspiration pneumonitis in nursing home residents: prospective application of a clinical algorithm

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate a clinical algorithm for the diagnosis of pneumonitis and pneumonia in nursing home residents. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Inpatient geriatrics unit. PARTICIPANTS: Nursing home residents admitted to the hospital with suspected pneumonia. MEASUREMENTS: Identification of pneumonitis and pneumonia using the algorithm; medical record review and abstraction of clinical data; hospital outcome and length of stay. RESULTS: One hundred seventy episodes of suspected pneumonia were screened with the algorithm and classified into four groups: 25% pneumonia, 28% aspiration pneumonitis of 24 hours or less duration, 12% aspiration pneumonitis of more than 24 hours' duration, and 35% an aspiration event without pneumonitis. Presenting symptoms and signs, laboratory tests, severity of illness measures, or serum C-reactive protein levels did not distinguish between the four groups. Those with an aspiration event without pneumonitis tended to be treated less often with antibiotic therapy after admission (P=.004) and after discharge (P=.01). Of those who survived, there was no significant difference in mean hospital length of stay between the four groups. There was no significant difference in the percentage of case fatality between the four groups, but those with aspiration pneumonitis of 24 hours or less duration and with an aspiration event without pneumonitis had a lower mortality than the other two groups. CONCLUSION: Distribution of episodes of suspected pneumonia by clinical category as determined using the algorithm was similar to that of the derivation study, as were case fatality rates in each category. These findings suggest that the algorithm may be useful for making the distinction between pneumonitis and pneumonia in nursing home residents; further studies are warranted.     

Improving the quality of care for patients with pneumonia in very small hospitals

BACKGROUND: Despite the publication of guidelines for the management of pneumonia, significant variation in care continues to exist. While there have been several published reports of quality improvement projects for pneumonia, there are few data on the effectiveness of these efforts in small hospitals. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that a project implemented by a quality improvement organization in small hospitals would lead to an improvement in care that could not be accounted for by secular trends in the management of pneumonia. METHODS: Medicare-insured hospital admissions for pneumonia were reviewed from 20 small hospitals in Oklahoma (intervention group) at baseline and after feedback. Project intervention included onsite feedback presentations to the medical staff, samples of performance improvement materials, and comparative measures of performance of predefined quality indicators. A second group of 16 demographically similar hospitals (control group) was selected for review during the same 2 periods. These hospitals subsequently underwent an identical intervention with a follow-up assessment. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in process measures were demonstrated in the intervention hospitals, including performance of a sputum (P<.01) and blood (P<.001) cultures, antibiotic administration within 4 hours of hospital admission (P<.001), and administration of the first dose of antibiotic in the emergency department (P<.001). These measures in the control hospitals did not change significantly (P =.93, .08, .79, and .52, respectively) during the 2 periods. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in processes of care achieved by the intervention hospitals resulted from activities initiated because of participation in a quality improvement organization-directed project. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of quality improvement activities in very small hospitals.     

Limited role for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia

Background and objective: This study examined the potential utility of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) as a means of reducing the excessive number of patients hospitalized with low‐risk community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods: A prospective feasibility study was conducted, in which a selection algorithm was applied to a cohort of patients admitted with suspected CAP, to identify a group in whom admission may have been prevented by the use of OPAT. Numbers of potentially suitable patients, inpatient bed days saved and frequency of adverse events that may have led to readmission were measured. Results: There were 118 inpatients treated with confirmed CAP during the study period, of whom 27 had low‐risk disease (Pneumonia Severity Index grades I–III). Application of the selection algorithm identified eight (30% of those with low‐risk disease) patients who were potentially suitable for OPAT, and this group commonly experienced adverse events during follow up which may have resulted in readmission to hospital. Conclusions: In many hospitalized patients with CAP, outpatient therapy is precluded by either disease severity or active medical and psychosocial factors. This limits the role of OPAT as a tool for reducing the inpatient burden of CAP.     

SWAB/NVALT (Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy and Dutch Association of Chest Physicians) guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults

The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) and the Dutch Association of Chest Physicians (NVALT) convened a joint committee to develop evidence-based guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of community acquired pneumonia (CAP). The guidelines are intended for adult patients with CAP who present at the hospital and are treated as outpatients as well as for hospitalised patients up to 72 hours after admission. Areas covered include current patterns of epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of causative agents of CAP in the Netherlands, the possibility to predict the causative agent of CAP on the basis of clinical data at first presentation, risk factors associated with specific pathogens, the importance of the severity of disease upon presentation for choice of initial treatment, the role of rapid diagnostic tests in treatment decisions, the optimal initial empiric treatment and treatment when a specific pathogen has been identified, the timeframe in which the first dose of antibiotics should be given, optimal duration of antibiotic treatment and antibiotic switch from the intravenous to the oral route. Additional recommendations are made on the role of radiological investigations in the diagnostic work-up of patients with a clinical suspicion of CAP, on the potential benefit of adjunctive immunotherapy, and on the policy for patients with parapneumonic effusions.     

Community-acquired pneumonia due to gram-negative bacteria and pseudomonas aeruginosa: incidence,risk, and prognosis

BACKGROUND: Initial empirical antimicrobial treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is based on expected microbial patterns. We determined the incidence of, prognosis of, and risk factors for CAP due to gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: Consecutive patients with CAP hospitalized in our 1000-bed tertiary care university teaching hospital were studied prospectively. Independent risk factors for CAP due to GNB and for death were identified by means of stepwise logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: From January 1, 1997, until December 31, 1998, 559 hospitalized patients with CAP were included. Sixty patients (11%) had CAP due to GNB, including P aeruginosa in 39 (65%). Probable aspiration (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-5.2; P =.04), previous hospital admission (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.7-7.1; P<.001), previous antimicrobial treatment (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.01-3.7; P =.049), and the presence of pulmonary comorbidity (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.5-5.5; P =.02) were independent predictors of GNB. In a subgroup analysis of P aeruginosa pneumonia, pulmonary comorbidity (OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 2.2-15.3; P<.001) and previous hospital admission (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.8-8.3; P =.02) were predictive. Infection with GNB was independently associated with death (relative risk, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.6-7.4; P =.002). CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, in every tenth patient with CAP, an etiology due to GNB has to be considered. Patients with probable aspiration, previous hospitalization or antimicrobial treatment, and pulmonary comorbidity are especially prone to GNB. These pathogens are also an independent risk factor for death in patients with CAP.     

The emergency department community-acquired pneumonia trial: Methodology of a quality improvement intervention

Community-acquired pneumonia causes more than 4 million episodes of illness each year and has high morbidity, mortality, and total cost of care. Nationwide, nearly 75% of community-acquired pneumonia patients are initially evaluated and treated in hospital-based emergency departments (EDs). Substantial variation exists in illness severity assessment, hospital admission decisions, and performance of recommended processes of care. We designed an ED-based quality improvement trial focused on the initial care of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. We used the Pneumonia Severity Index and level of arterial oxygenation to identify patients at low risk for 30-day mortality and to guide admission decisionmaking. We assessed the performance of recommended “best practices,” consisting of assessment of arterial oxygenation, the collection of blood cultures for inpatients, and the timely initiation of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy for inpatients and outpatients. We conducted a 32-site, cluster-randomized trial in Pennsylvania and Connecticut, comparing the effectiveness and safety of 3 guideline implementation strategies of increasing intensity. The multifaceted implementation plans were carried out in conjunction with each state's quality improvement organization. This article describes the background, objectives, and methodology of this trial to translate evidence-based knowledge on the quality and efficiency of care for community-acquired pneumonia into clinical practice.     

Nonvalue of the initial microbiological studies in the management of nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of the initial microbiological studies (MBS), consisting of sputum Gram's stains, sputum cultures, and blood cultures, in the etiologic diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) without comorbidity. DESIGN: A prospective study of 74 adult patients hospitalized with nonsevere CAP empirically treated according to the American Thoracic Society guidelines (ATS-GL) and evaluated with Gram's stains and cultures of valid sputum specimens and blood cultures. SETTING: University-affiliated community hospital. RESULTS: Gram's stain of a valid sputum specimen failed to identify the etiologic agent in all patients. Sputum cultures identified pathogens in only four patients (5%). The results of all blood cultures were negative. All patients responded to the initial empiric antibiotic coverage selected according to the ATS-GL, and the results of the initial MBS had no clinical impact. CONCLUSION: The initial MBS, such as sputum Gram's stains, sputum cultures, and blood cultures, have no value in the management of nonsevere CAP without comorbid factors.     

Management of community-acquired pneumonia by trained family general practitioners.

SETTING: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a respiratory health disease with a high prevalence in the general population. Family general practitioners (GPs) can play an important role in CAP management by reducing unnecessary hospital admissions and, consequently, national health costs. OBJECTIVE: To assess CAP management by trained GPs. DESIGN: A course in CAP management, including a risk classification method based only on clinical criteria, was developed within the framework of an educational programme. GPs who participated in the programme (n = 220) were asked to collect data on their CAP patients. RESULTS: GPs (n = 94, response rate 42.7%) provided information on 370 patients (50% males, aged 18-93 years). The numbers of patients judged to be at low, moderate and high risk were 81%, 13% and 6%, respectively. The admission rate was 19.5%. All home-treated patients had good clinical outcomes. Home treatment was based on quinolones (62%), beta-lactams (23%) and macrolides (15%). The attributable economic mean cost of antibiotic home treatment was euro 96 per episode (standard deviation 71, range 17-445). CONCLUSIONS: The good outcomes suggest that GPs managed their CAP patients well, adhering to the content of the CAP management course. The risk evaluation of patients admitted to hospital, based exclusively on clinical elements, was consistent with more complex classification.