Fracture strength of teeth with flared root canals restored with glass fibre posts

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the fracture strength and pattern of failure of teeth with weakened roots reconstructed by different procedures. METHODS: In an in vitro study root posts were placed in 50 endodontically treated canines, divided into 5 groups (n=10) as follows: cast metallic post; glass fibre post with smaller diameter than the root canal; glass fibre post with smaller diameter than the root canal + glass fibre strips; glass fibre post with smaller diameter than the root canal + accessory glass fibre posts; anatomical post (glass fibre post with smaller diameter than the root canal, relined with low viscosity composite resin). Posts were luted with resin cement and the coronal portion of posts was constructed with composite resin. Metallic crowns were cemented on the posts. Specimens were submitted to compressive load in a universal testing machine. Fracture strength values of each group were compared. RESULTS: Fracture strength values were for Groups 1-5 respectively: 1087.06; 745.69; 775.41; 920.64; 876.12kgf, with significant differences between Groups 1 and 2 and between Groups 1 and 3 (p<0.05). Observed patterns of fracture were: Group 1 - 100% of roots fractured; Groups 2 and 4 - variable fracture modes; Group 3 - 60% of fractures occurred in the cervical root third; Group 5 - 50% of failures occurred in the coronal portion of the post. CONCLUSIONS: The fracture strength of teeth with cast metallic posts, teeth with anatomical posts or teeth with glass fibre posts combined with accessory posts was similar. All teeth restored with cast metallic posts presented fractures and were unfavourable to maintenance of the remaining tooth structure. Teeth with fibre posts (Groups 2 to 5) presented variable fracture modes; however, the maximum percentage of unfavourable fractures was 30%.     

Comparison of the push-out strength of two fiber post systems dependent on different types of resin cements

The purpose of this study was to compare the push-out strength of glass fiber posts dependent on the resin cement. One hundred human teeth were divided into five groups (n = 20). Two glass fiber post systems (DT Light SL (DTSL) and RelyX Fiber Post (RF)) were used. DTSL posts were cemented with one "etch & rinse" system (ER) or one of three self-adhesive resin cements (SA). The RF posts were cemented with RelyX Unicem. Afterwards, half of the specimens were thermocycled (TC; 5°C/55°C, 5,000 cycles). All specimens were cut into disks (thickness, 2 mm). The push-out test was performed (crosshead speed, 1 mm/min), fracture types were determined (×25 and ×40 magnification), and statistical analysis was performed (one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Scheffe test, p < 0.05). One-way ANOVA showed a significant influence of the resin cement on the push-out strength of the glass fiber posts before thermocycling (p < 0.001). After TC, no significant differences were detected. Microscopic evaluation showed mainly adhesive failures between post and cement for ER or mixed fractures for SA. The bond strength of adhesively cemented glass fiber posts is not dependent on the type of resin cement after TC. The use of SA can lead to bond strength values comparable to ER. Self-adhesive resin cements could be used just as well as resin cements with "etch & rinse" adhesive systems for the cementation of glass fiber posts.     

Effect of post‐space treatments on the push‐out bond strength and failure modes of glass fibre posts

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different post‐space treatments on the push‐out bond strength and failure modes of glass fibre posts. Forty mandibular premolar roots were cut and endodontically treated. Post spaces were prepared and roots were divided into four groups. In group 1 distilled water irrigation (control), in group 2 2.25% NaOCl irrigation, in group 3 2.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA irrigation were done and in group 4 diode laser was applied to the prepared post spaces. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis was made for each group. Fibre posts were then luted with resin cement. Each root was prepared for push‐out test. Data were statistically analysed with anova (P = 0.05). After push‐out test, the failure modes were observed but not statistically analysed. There were statistically significant differences between Group 3 and Group 2 in both regions (P < 0.05), also in the middle region of Group 4 and Group 2 (P < 0.05). Cervical root segments showed higher bond strengths than middle ones in all groups (P < 0.05). The highest bond strength values were obtained from NaOCl/EDTA and the lowest bond strength values were obtained from NaOCl for both regions.     

In vitro evaluation of the retention of zirconia-based ceramic posts luted with glass ionomer and resin cements

The retention of zirconia-based ceramic posts (CosmoPost system) luted with glass ionomer and resin cements was evaluated. Thirty-two extracted, caries-free, unrestored teeth were selected and stored in chlorhexidine and water solution. The teeth were endodontically treated and randomly assigned to two groups (n=16). Each tooth was decoronated and prepared to a depth of 10.0 mm from root surface to receive a 1.4 mm diameter zirconium dioxide post. Each group had posts cemented with either glass ionomer cement (Fuji I) or resin cement (Variolink II). The post/teeth specimens were embedded in resin blocks and subjected to tensile testing. The tensile force required to dislodge the cemented posts in a tensile testing machine was recorded. The mean stress values of both groups were analyzed for statistical differences using ANOVA and Student's t-test. Significance level was set at 5%. Mean peak forces at failure (N) and standard deviation for the tested cements were the following: Fuji I = 121.8 (+/-17.4) and Variolink II = 228.1 (+/-36.8). Posts luted with the resin cement presented statistically significant higher tensile bond strength than those retained with glass ionomer (p<0.05). It may be concluded that zirconia posts cemented with resin-based cement (Variolink II) failed at statistically significant higher values compared to those cemented with glass ionomer cement (Fuji I). Regardless of the cement type, the posts failed adhesively at the cement/post interface when subjected to a tensile force.     

The effect of calcium silicate-based sealer on the push-out bond strength of fibre posts

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the iRoot SP root canal sealer on the push‐out bond strength of fibre posts cemented with self‐adhesive resin cement. Methods:  Forty‐eight extracted maxillary incisors were randomly divided into four groups according to the tested sealer (n = 12): group 1 – control (only gutta‐percha points, no sealer); group 2 – AH Plus Jet (resin‐based sealer); group 3 – Endofill (zinc oxide‐eugenol‐based sealer); and group 4 – iRoot SP (calcium silicate‐based sealer). All root canals were filled with gutta‐percha, and groups 2–4 additionally received one of the sealers. Fibre posts were cemented with the self‐adhesive resin cement Clearfil SA Cement. The specimens were sectioned in the coronal, middle and apical regions, producing three slices of 1 mm thickness. The push‐out test was performed. All data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey tests (α = 0.05). Results:  No statistically significant differences were found between the control group, AH Plus Jet and iRoot SP (p > 0.05). The Endofill sealer showed significantly lower bond strength compared to the other sealers and the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusions:  The calcium silicate‐based sealer did not adversely affect the bond strength of the fibre posts cemented with self‐adhesive resin cement.     

Effect of endodontic sealer and resin luting strategies on pull-out bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of eugenol-containing endodontic sealers and luting strategy on the pull-out bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin. Sixty-four bovine incisors were randomly assigned into two groups of 32 specimens each for obturation procedure with gutta-percha only, or with Pulp Canal Sealer EWT Subsequently, the roots were prepared for the fiber post Reforpost and all specimens of each endodontic sealing procedure were allocated to four groups (n = 8), according to the strategies for post cementation: A) Single Bond 2 and RelyX ARC; B) All Bond 2 and C&B cement; C) All Bond 2 and RelyX ARC; D) Single Bond 2 and C&B Cement. The posts were cemented immediately after the endodontic treatment. The pull-out test was performed at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min in a universal testing machine (EMIC). Data (Kgf) were submitted to a two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p < or = 0.05). The eugenol-based sealer did not influence the pull-out bond strength of fiber posts regardless of the luting strategy. RelyX ARC showed higher bond strength than C&B Cement when used with Single Bond 2 adhesive system, when the eugenol-based sealer was present. All Bond 2, when associated to all cements studied, promoted similar bond strength, regardless of the eugenol-containing endodontic sealer In conclusion, eugenol-containing sealer did not influence the pull-out bond strength values of the resin luting systems for glass fiber post cementation. The bond system and resin cement association from the same manufacturer had similar bond strength values for dentin.     

Bond strengths of three types of fibre-reinforced post systems in various regions of root canals

Aim To evaluate the bond strengths of three adhesive/resin cement/fibre post systems to coronal, middle and apical thirds of post space dentine. Methodology Three types of glass‐fibre post systems were selected for the study. Saremco Post Non‐stop Fibre (Saremco), FRC Postec Plus (Ivoclar Vivadent) and Anatomical Post (Dentalica) were luted in prepared root canals using adhesive system and resin cement provided by the respective manufacturer. The luting agent was placed into the root canal using a specific syringe with needle. A push‐out test was performed on sections from the apical, middle and coronal parts of each specimen to measure bond strength. All fractured specimens were observed using a stereomicroscope to identify the modes of failure. Results Bond strength values were significantly affected both by the post–adhesive–cement system used and by root region (P < 0.05). Additionally, there was no significant interaction between the post system and region of canal factors (P > 0.05). The highest bond strength values were found in the coronal third for all experimental groups. The middle and apical thirds exhibited similar bond strengths with no statistically significant differences amongst them. Saremco and Precision post systems had the highest retentive strengths, whilst the Ivoclar post system had the lowest values. Microscopic analysis of the specimens revealed a prevalence of post–cement and mixed failures. Conclusions Type of post–adhesive–cement system and root position had a significant effect on fibre post retention. The coronal region of the canals was characterized by significantly higher bond strengths.     

Microtensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) of a dual-cure resin core material to different regions of fibre posts using different surface treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five silica zirconium glass fibre posts (Snowpost) and 25 quartz fibre posts (Aestheti-Plus) were used and randomly divided into five groups according to the surface treatments: (1) no surface treatment (Control) (2) dual-cure bonding agent, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V (LB) (3) LB followed by light curing for 20 s (LB and C) (4) silane coupling bonding agent agent, Clearfil Photobond with Porcelain Bond Activator (PB+PBA) (5) PB+PBA followed by light curing for 20 s (PB+PBA and LC). Treated posts were cemented into artificial post cavities using a dual-cure composite core material (Clearfil DC Core) and cured for 60 s from the top of the cavity. After 24 h storage in water, each specimen was serially sliced into 8, 0.6 x 0.6 mm2-thick beams for the microTBS test. The data were divided into three regions (upper/middle/bottom) and analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Dunnet's T3 multiple comparisons (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in bond strength between the three regions (p>0.05). The bond strengths were enhanced by the application of a silane coupling agent. For Snowpost, photoirradiation of the dual-cure bonding agent applied to the post surface significantly improved the bond strength (p<0.05) whereas it did not affect the bond strength of Aestheti-Plus post (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The bond strength between fibre post and dual-cure resin core material depends upon the type of post and surface treatment. There were no regional differences in microTBS of the bonded post.     

Push-out bond strength of fiberglass posts cemented with adhesive and self-adhesive resin cements according to the root canal surface

ObjectiveEvaluating the bond strength of fiberglass posts cemented with different resin cements. Materials and Methods: Seventy freshly extracted roots of healthy human canines were endodontically treated and prepared to receive fiberglass posts. The roots were randomly divided into seven groups: (G1) RelyX ARC, (G2) Enforce, (G3) BisCem, (G4) Duo-Link, (G5) Cement Post, (G6) Variolink II, and (G7) RelyX U200. After post cementation, the specimens were sectioned perpendicularly to the root axis using a high-speed diamond disc, totaling 340 specimens. The strength values obtained in the push-out test were submitted to two-factor ANOVA and Tukey test (p = 0.05). Results: The root thirds (p = 0.001) and the type of cement (p = 0.001) influenced the bond strength values. The relation between these two factors was also significant (p = 0.011). Conclusions: The bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements was significantly higher as compared to other cements. Besides the cervical third in roots cemented with conventional cements types presented the highest bond strength values (p < 0.05).     

Push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin using glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cements

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts to root dentin after cementation with glass ionomer (GICs) and resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs).

Material and Methods

Fifty human maxillary canines were transversally sectioned at 15 mm from the apex. Canals were prepared with a step back technique until the application of a #55 K-file and filled. Post spaces were prepared and specimens were divided into five groups according to the cement used for post cementation: Luting & Lining Cement; Fuji II LC Improved; RelyX Luting; Ketac Cem; and Ionoseal. After cementation of the glass fiber posts, all roots were stored at 100% humidity until testing. For push-out test, 1-mm thick slices were produced. The push-out test was performed in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute and the values (MPa) were analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene''s tests and by two-way ANOVA and Tukey''s post hoc test at a significance level of 5%.

Results

Fiber posts cemented using Luting & Lining Cement, Fuji II LC Improved, and Ketac Cem presented the highest bond strength to root dentin, followed by RelyX Luting. Ionoseal presented the lowest bond strength values (P>0.05). The post level did not influence the bond strength of fiber posts to root dentin (P=0.148). The major cause of failure was cohesive at the cement for all GICs and RMGICs.

Conclusions

Except for Ionoseal, all cements provided satisfactory bond strength values.     

玻璃纤维桩表面不同处理方法对粘接强度的影响

目的 评价表面处理方法对玻璃纤维桩粘接强度的影响.方法 选用MATCHPOST玻璃纤维桩和Relyx玻璃纤维桩各16根,按照表面处理方法随机分为4组:对照组(无表面处理);单独硅烷偶联剂处理组;单独粘接剂处理组;硅烷偶联剂+粘接剂联合处理组,每组每种纤维桩4根.用树脂水门汀将纤维桩粘接就位至圆筒模具,再用自凝塑料包埋.37C蒸馏水水浴24h后从垂直于纤维桩长轴的方向将样本从底部切割2个1 mm薄片.对64个薄片进行微推出测试.所得数据用SPSS19.0统计软件进行分析.结果 MATCHPOST玻璃纤维桩四组中,硅烷偶联剂+粘接剂联合处理组的粘接强度最高,与对照组相比差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05),与单独粘接剂处理组相比统计学上具有非常显著差异(P＜0.01);其他各组间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).Relyx玻璃纤维桩四组中,硅烷偶联剂+粘接剂联合处理组粘接强度最高,但各组间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 硅烷偶联剂和粘接剂联合处理后可以增强玻璃纤维桩与树脂水门汀的粘接强度.     

The effect of the application of gaseous ozone and ND:YAG laser on glass‐fibre post bond strength

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the application of gaseous ozone and Nd:YAG laser on glass‐fibre post bond strength. Forty‐two madibular premolar roots were cut, endodontically instrumented and irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl. Post spaces were prepared and roots were divided into three groups (n = 14). The antimicrobial pretreatment was conducted as follows: gaseous ozone, Nd:YAG laser and control (no additional disinfection methods). Scanning electron microscope analysis was made for each group (n = 2). A resin cement was used for luting the posts. For push‐out test, each root was cut horizontally (two cervical, two middle and two apical). Statistical analyses were performed with one‐way anova (α = 0.05). Fracture types were observed. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in cervical and apical segments of laser and control groups (P < 0.05). The disinfection of the post spaces with Nd:YAG laser and ozone had no adverse effects on bond strength of glass‐fibre post.     

INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ADHESIVE SYSTEMS ON THE PULL-OUT BOND STRENGTH OF GLASS FIBER POSTS

This in vitro study evaluated the tensile bond strength of glass fiber posts (Reforpost – Angelus-Brazil) cemented to root dentin with a resin cement (RelyX ARC – 3M/ESPE) associated with two different adhesive systems (Adper Single Bond - 3M/ESPE and Adper Scotchbond Multi Purpose (MP) Plus – 3M/ESPE), using the pull-out test. Twenty single-rooted human teeth with standardized root canals were randomly assigned to 2 groups (n=10): G1- etching with 37% phosphoric acid gel (3M/ESPE) + Adper Single Bond + #1 post (Reforpost – Angelus) + four #1 accessory posts (Reforpin – Angelus) + resin cement; G2- etching with 37% phosphoric acid gel + Adper Scotchbond MP Plus + #1 post + four #1 accessory posts + resin cement. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 7 days and submitted to the pull-out test in a universal testing machine (EMIC) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The mean values of bond strength (kgf) and standard deviation were: G1- 29.163 ± 7.123; G2- 37.752 ±13.054. Statistical analysis (Student''s t-test; α=0.05 showed no statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the groups. Adhesive bonding failures between resin cement and root canal dentin surface were observed in both groups, with non-polymerized resin cement in the apical portion of the post space when Single Bond was used (G1). The type of adhesive system employed on the fiber post cementation did not influence the pull-out bond strength.     

Influence of endodontic sealer cement on fibreglass post bond strength to root dentine

Aim To test the hypothesis that the composition of endodontic sealer cements and the time elapsed between root filling and fibreglass post fixation interferes with adhesion to root canal dentine. Methodology Sixty bovine incisor roots were divided into five groups (n = 12): CI, unfilled; SI, filled with a calcium hydroxide‐based cement‐Sealer 26, and immediate post fixation; S7, Sealer 26 and post fixation after 7 days; EI, filled with a zinc oxide and eugenol‐based cement‐Endofill and immediate fixation; and E7 Endofill and post fixation after 7 days. The posts were cemented with adhesive system and dual resin cement. Ten roots were cross‐sectioned to obtain two 1‐mm‐thick discs for each cervical (TC), middle (TM) and apical (TA) third of the prepared root portion. The posts were submitted to a micropush‐out test. The other two teeth were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy to analyse the bond interface. Data were analysed using anova , Tukey and Dunnett tests (P < 0.05). Results Group EI was associated with a significant reduction in bond strength values irrespective of the root region; TC = 3.50 MPa (P = 0.0001); TM = 2.22 MPa (P = 0.0043) and TA = 1.45 MPa (P = 0.003). Region of canal had an influence on the values for the cement used in group E7, in which only the TA presented differences from the CI. Conclusions Endofill interfered negatively with the bond to root dentine along its full length and in the TA when post fixation was delayed for 7 days. Bond strength decreased from crown to apex in all groups.     

Compressive and flexural behaviour of fibre reinforced endodontic posts

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the mechanical properties of five types of fibre-reinforced composite (FRC) posts and compare them with traditional metal post.MethodsFive FRC posts and a metallic post having different geometry and type of fibre (glass, carbon or quartz fibre) were loaded to failure in compression and bending. The transverse sections of FRC posts were observed using SEM to evaluate the fracture mode and the percentage of fibres (compared with burn-off test). Densities and voids content were also evaluated.ResultsMechanical results were subjected to a one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p < 0.05). In compression, quartz fibre posts exhibited the greater maximum load and ultimate strength, carbon fibre posts showed a poor compressive behaviour. All posts had similar compressive moduli.Carbon posts showed the highest flexural properties (p < 0.0001) while glass posts the greater maximum load. The fracture load values correlated to the diameters of posts showed a parabolic behaviour. The flexural strengths of all posts were four and seven times higher than dentine.The elastic moduli of almost all posts were similar to dentine. The compressive strengths were lower than flexural strengths. The fibre diameters ranged from 5.2 to 26 μm, the volume percentage of fibres was about 64%. The content of voids of some posts lower their mechanical behaviour.ConclusionsCompressive properties of FRC posts were lower than in bending. The flexural properties of FRC posts were higher than the metal post and similar to dentine. The mechanical behaviour is influenced by voids.     

Fracture resistance of structurally compromised root filled bovine teeth restored with accessory glass fibre posts

Aim  To evaluate the mechanical behaviour of structurally compromised root filled bovine roots after restoration with accessory glass fibre posts.
Methodology  Fifty roots of bovine teeth received conventional post preparations with a cervical diameter of 3.5 mm. The roots were assigned to five groups ( n  = 10): group MP – cast metal post, group GP – glass fibre post and group AGP – glass fibre post plus accessory glass fibre posts. In groups GP-R and AGP-R (similar to groups GP and AGP), 2 mm of coronal tooth structure were left intact. All groups were subjected to an elastic limit assay and tested in an universal machine for fracture resistance. Repeated measures anova were performed to examine differences in fracture resistance; fracture modes were analysed by Fischer's exact test.
Results  The mean fracture resistance values (kgf) were 61.8 (MP), 63.1 (GP), 55.5 (AGP), 56 (GP-R) and (53.1) AGP-R. No statistically significant difference was found between groups. The Fisher's exact test indicated significant differences ( P  < 0.05) in the fracture mode amongst groups MP, GP and AGP, indicating 100%, 50% and 10% of catastrophic fractures, respectivelly.
Conclusions  The use of accessory glass fibre posts affected the fracture mode favorably: 90% of fractures in group AGP were in the coronal third.     

The interference of the cleaning procedure of root walls with two different solvents on the adhesion of fiberglass intraradicular posts

Aim: This study was undertaken to examine the effect of root canal (RT) sealers content and the cleaning procedure of RT walls on bond strength (BS) of a fiber reinforced composite (FRC) post cemented with resin-based or zinc phosphate cement. Materials and methods: Forty bovine roots were divided into 2 groups (n = 20) and obturated with gutta-percha points plus Sealer 26 sealer or gutta-percha points plus N-Rickert sealer. In each group, half (n = 10) of intracanal walls was cleaned with ethanol and the other half with sulfuric ether. In each of these subgroups, half of intracanal posts (n = 5) were cemented with Bistite resin-based cement and half with zinc phosphate cement. Specimens were submitted to pull-out test and tensile force until post dislodgement. The maximum forces required for post removal was expressed in MPa, means were submitted to statistical analysis (Analysis of Variance Test, a = 0.05). Results: Fiber reinforced composite cemented with zinc phosphate were significantly more retentive than those cemented with Bistite (p < 0.05). Regarding the influence of eugenol-based sealer on post retention, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) only between groups cemented with Bistite, in which canals filled with N-Rickert + gutta-percha showed lower BS than canals filled with Sealer 26 + gutta-percha. Conclusion: Despite endodontic cement used, higher pull-out bond strength were obtained when posts were cemented with zinc phosphate. Clinical significance: The importance of ethanol or sulphuric ether application to properly replace water from intraradicular dentine still requires further investigations, especially to clarify if this technique may reduce the effect of aging and improve the stability of the bond, when used to cement fiber posts into the root canal. Keywords: Laboratory research, Dentin, Eugenol, Resin cements, Root canal filling material, Pull-out test, Cleaning procedure. How to cite this article: Gomes MF, Botta SB, Matos AB, Garone- Netto N. The Interference of the Cleaning Procedure of Root Walls with Two Different Solvents on the Adhesion of Fiberglass Intraradicular Posts. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(3):275-279. Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None declared.     

Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.

OBJECTIVES: Retention of composite resins to metal can be improved when metal surfaces are conditioned. The purpose of this investigation was to investigate the effect of two conditioning treatments on the tensile bond strength of four resin-based luting cements and zinc phosphate cement to titanium posts. METHODS: The effect on tensile bond strength of (1) air-particle abrasion (50 microm Al2O3) and (2) silica coating (30 microm SiO(x)) and silanization of tapered titanium posts prior to luting with any of the four resin composite luting cements (Compolute) Aplicap, Flexi-Flow cemTM, Panavia 21 EX, Twinlook) were evaluated. The posts luted with zinc phosphate cement (Tenet) were considered as the control group. Following endodontic preparation of 100 intact anterior human teeth with hand instruments, the post spaces were prepared using the opening drills of the corresponding size of the posts. All posts were cemented into the roots according to the manufacturer's instructions of each cement. The specimens were first stored in water at 37 degrees C for 24 h and then subjected to thermocycling (5000 cycles, 5-55 degrees C, 30 s). The tensile strength values were measured on a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed statistically using ANOVA and corrected with Scheffé-test due to the significance levels (P<0.05). RESULTS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The composite resin luting cements did not show significant differences (P<0.05) showing values between (352+/-76N-475+/-104N) when the posts were air-abraded. After silica coating and silanization, significantly higher (P<0.05) tensile strengths were obtained for Compolute Aplicap (600+/-123N) than those of the other luting cements (Flexi-Flow cemTM: 191+/-62N; Panavia 21 EX: 375+/-77; Twinlook: 430+/-78N). No significant differences (P>0.05) were found between the tensile strength of the posts luted with zinc phosphate (414+/-102N) and the resin composite cements. Silica coating and silanization revealed the highest tensile bond strength in posts luted with Compolute Aplicap but it was not effective for the other experimental groups. Zinc phosphate cement exhibited tensile bond strength as good as resin composite cements.     

Microleakage along Glassix glass fibre posts cemented with three different materials assessed using a fluid transport system

AIM: To evaluate the microleakage along Glassix fibre posts cemented with three different materials. METHODOLOGY: The root canals of maxillary central incisor teeth were filled and restored with Glassix posts (Harald Nordin sa, Chailly/Montreux, Switzerland) cemented with either a zinc-phosphate Harvard cement (Richter & Hoffmann, Harvard Dental GmbH, Berlin, Germany), Fuji PLUS cement (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) or Variolink II cement (Vivadent, Schaan, Lichtenstein) in three groups of 15 canals each. Twenty unrestored canals served as a control group, 10 filled with gutta-percha and sealer (negative control group), the remaining 10 with gutta-percha only (positive control group). Coronal microleakage was evaluated using a fluid transport system. The movement of an air bubble in a capillary glass tube connected to the apex of the experimental root section was measured over 5-min periods. Measurements were performed four times for each specimen and the mean values recorded. ANOVA and Duncan's test were performed. RESULTS: The positive control group had the highest values of microleakage. Amongst experimental groups, the highest values of microleakage occurred in the group with the posts cemented with Harvard cement, followed by Fuji PLUS and Variolink II cements. Groups with Fuji PLUS, Variolink II and the negative control group had significantly (P < 0.00001) less microleakage compared with the Harvard cement group and the positive control group. CONCLUSION: Canals with Glassix posts cemented with Variolink II and Fuji PLUS cement had the least leakage when assessed using a fluid transport system.     

Effect of luting cement and thermomechanical loading on retention of glass fibre posts in root canals

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of luting cement and thermomechanical loading on the retention of glass fibre posts in root canals.

Methods

One hundred and forty-four single-rooted human premolars were endodontically treated and restored with RelyX Fibre Posts. The teeth were divided into four groups according to the cements used (Fuji I, Fuji CEM, RelyX Unicem and RelyX ARC). Each group was further divided into two subgroups according to the method of ageing (immediately tested and after thermomechanical loading). Bond strength was evaluated using a pull-out test. Microleakage was examined quantitatively with dye penetration. The dentine–cement-post bonding interface was assessed using scanning electron microscopy. Data were analysed with two-way ANOVA (pull-out test) and Kruskal–Wallis analysis (microleakage).

Results

The pull-out bond strength and microleakage were significantly affected by the type of cement and ageing. Although RelyX ARC showed the highest bond strength before thermomechanical loading (p < 0.05), the sealing ability of this cement was worse than those exhibited in Fuji CEM and RelyX Unicem (p < 0.05). After thermomechanical loading, pull-out strengths of Fuji I and Fuji CEM were significantly increased, whereas that of RelyX ARC group significantly decreased (p < 0.05). The sealing ability of Fuji CEM was significantly better than the two resin cement groups (p < 0.05) after ageing.

Conclusion

Fuji CEM demonstrates increased pull-out strength after thermomechanical loading and favourable sealing ability compared with the other cements.

Clinical significance

Resin-modified glass ionomer cements have the potential benefit of achieving long-term retention when used for luting glass fibre post to root canal dentine. So it may be recommended for the cementation of glass fibre post in clinics.