86例颅内蛛网膜囊肿的临床特征分析

【目的】探讨颅内蛛网膜囊肿的治疗方法及临床疗效。【方法】回顾性分析本院自2000年9月至2010年10月经头颅核磁共振和（或）CT确诊的86例患者的临床资料。其中28例定期观察,未做特殊治疗仅作一般处理;16例经保守治疗;共42例行手术治疗,其中21例行囊肿分流手术;17例行脑室镜下囊肿壁切除手术;4例行开颅囊肿壁切除术。【结果】随访6个月至10年经过治疗的患者治疗后,】盎床症状均有所改善,复查头颅MRI及CT显示手术治疗患者囊肿均有不同程度缩小。未做特殊者症状无明显变化,复查囊肿无明显增大。其中一例为右侧侧脑室枕角囊肿患者,在外院行囊肿切除手术,术后脑积水,来本院行分流手术,术后效果不佳,死亡。【结论】囊肿分流手术和脑室镜手术是治疗蛛网膜囊肿的首选治疗方案。     

Postoperative discal pseudocyst and its similarities to discal cyst: A case report

BACKGROUNDPostoperative discal pseudocyst (PDP) is a rare condition that presents after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Due to the lack of information, the diagnosis and treatment of PDP remain controversial. Herein, we report a PDP case that occurred following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and received conservative treatment. Additionally, we review all the published literature regarding PDP and propose our hypothesis regarding PDP pathology.CASE SUMMARYA 23-year-old man presented with a relapse of low back pain and numbness in his left lower extremity after undergoing percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Repeat magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a cystic lesion at the surgical site with communication with the inner disc. The patient was diagnosed as having PDP. The patient received conservative treatment, which resulted in rapid improvement and spontaneous regression of the lesion, and had a favorable outcome in follow-up.CONCLUSIONPDP and discal cyst (DC) exhibit similarities in both histological and epidemiological characteristics, which indicates the same pathological origin of PDP and DC. The iatrogenic annular injury during discectomy might accelerate the pathological progression of DC. For patients with mild to moderate symptoms, conservative treatment can lead to great improvement, even inducing spontaneous regression. However, surgical cystectomy is necessary in patients with neurological deficits and where conservative treatment is ineffective.     

New minimally invasive discectomy technique through the interlaminar space using a percutaneous endoscope

INTRODUCTION: The serial dilating technique used to access herniated discs at the L5-S1 space using percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (PED) via an 8 mm skin incision can possibly injure the S1 nerve root. In this paper, we describe in detail a new surgical procedure to safely access the disc and to avoid the nerve root damage. This small-incision endoscopic technique, small-incision microendoscopic discectomy (sMED), mimics microendoscopic discectomy and applies PED. MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The sMED approach is similar to the well-established microendoscopic discectomy technique. To secure the surgical field, a duckbill-type PED cannula is used. Following laminotomy of L5 using a high-speed drill, the ligamentum flavum is partially removed using the Kerrison rongeur. Using the curved nerve root retractor, the S1 nerve root is gradually and gently moved caudally. Following the compete retraction of the S1 nerve root to the caudal side of the herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP), the nerve root is retracted safely medially and caudally using the bill side of the duckbill PED cannula. Next, using the HNP rongeur for PED, the HNP is removed piece by piece until the nerve root is decompressed. A total of 30 patients with HNP at the L5-S1 level underwent sMED. In all cases, HNP was successfully removed and patients showed improvement following surgery. Only one patient complained of moderate radiculopathy at the final visit. No complications were encountered. DISCUSSION: We introduced a minimally invasive technique to safely remove HNP at the L5-S1 level. sMED is possibly the least invasive technique for HNP removal at the L5-S1 level.     

Transcatheter coil embolization of an aneurysm of an anomalous splenic artery : Usefulness of double microcatheter method

A contralateral neurologic deficit following microendoscopic discectomy (MED) or laminectomy (MEL) had not previously been reported. Between September 1999 and April 2004, 60 patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniations or spinal stenotic syndrome received MED or MEL at the authors' institution. Three out of 60 patients were found to exhibit a contralateral neurologic deficit following unilateral microendoscopic surgery. All three patients complained of a newly developed, contralateral neurologic deficit following their operations. One MED patient with a concomitant contralateral disc herniation developed contralateral motor and sensory deficits and required immediate open surgery. At the two‐year follow‐up, a residual motor deficit was noted. The other two patients (1 MED, 1MEL) with temporary sensory deficits were only treated conservatively and experienced complete recovery one week and six weeks following the operation, respectively. Surgeons should pay close attention to the possibility that contralateral neurologic deficits may occur following MED or MEL. Our reports indicate that caution should be exercised when performing microendoscopic procedures on patients with substantial dural compromise, a concomitant contralateral disc herniation, or a lateral spinal stenosis, which may be etiologies.     

Minimally invasive and simultaneous removal of herniated intracanal and extracanal lumbar nucleus pulposus with a percutaneous spinal endoscope

Herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) in the lumbar spine is usually found in the neural canal (in the intracanal space) and occasionally in the extracanal space, where it is known as a lateral HNP. HNP is rarely found simultaneously in both spaces. However, we experienced such a case in a 48‐year‐old man who presented with right leg pain and lower back pain that had lasted for more than a year. MRI revealed HNP in both the right intracanal and extracanal spaces at L2‐L3. A transforaminal approach was used to complete a percutaneous endoscopic discectomy. An 8‐mm incision was made with the patient under local anesthesia, and the percutaneous endoscope was inserted at the affected disc space. First, the HNP fragments in the intracanal space were removed, and then the cannula and endoscope were extracted to the extracanal space where the extracanal fragments were removed. Two hours after the surgery, the patient stood and walked. Right leg pain and lower back pain had disappeared. Unlike other techniques such as Love's procedure and the microendoscopic discectomy technique, the use of a transforaminal approach with the percutaneous endoscopic technique enables the HNP fragments in the intracanal and extracanal spaces to be removed at the same time with a single approach.     

Microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in the elderly

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the feasibility of microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation in elderly patients over the age of 65. Methods: The elderly group consisted of 44 patients (27 men and 17 women; mean age, 69.6 years; mean follow‐up, 27.7 months) with sciatic pain caused by lumbar disc herniation who were treated using MED. The younger group was comprised of 44 sex‐matched patients younger than 65 years. The younger group also had lumbar disc herniation treated with MED and served as the control group. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for low back pain (JOA score). Results: The results revealed that the good surgical outcomes achieved in the younger group were also achieved in the elderly group (JOA scores: 14.8 ± 4.1 in the younger group before surgery versus 13.0 ± 3.2 in the elderly group; 26.0 ± 2.4 at follow‐up versus 25.5 ± 2.7; recovery rates of JOA scores: 78.3 ± 17.8% versus 77.9 ± 16.6%, respectively). The mean surgical time was 78.3 ± 31.0 min in the elderly group and 69.2 ± 22.9 min (P=0.12) in the younger group; the blood loss was 33.9 ± 71.9 cc and 28.0 ± 37.8 cc (P=0.63), respectively. Complications included a dural tear in two elderly patients, and postoperative discitis and hematoma in one elderly patient each: all of these complications were managed successfully. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that MED is a feasible minimally invasive surgical option for elderly patients with lumbar disc herniation.     

椎管内囊肿的手术治疗

目的探讨椎管内囊肿的手术治疗疗效。方法 2006年5月-2009年12月对30例患者的临床表现、影像学和治疗情况进行回顾性分析。结果 30例均行手术治疗,3例为椎管内单侧硬膜下髓外囊肿,3例为脑脊膜囊肿,12例为髓外硬脊膜下囊肿,9例为神经根袖套部囊肿（Tarlov囊肿）,3例为脊管内肠源性囊肿。术后21例症状消失;9例好转,其中3例术后发生脑脊液漏,伤口二次缝合未成功,后经内引流后切口愈合。结论椎管内囊肿的临床表现及体征复杂,不典型,与椎管内肿瘤及椎间盘突出症的临床表现和体征相似;对症状及体征明显者宜施行手术治疗,手术治疗效果较满意。     

A novel therapeutic approach to non‐parasitic splenic cysts: Laparoscopic fenestration and endothelium obliteration

Splenic cyst is a relatively rare disease; true splenic cysts are classified as parasitic and non‐parasitic cysts. Although most cysts are asymptomatic, large cyst cases show clinical symptoms, consisting mainly of dyspepsia and fullness in the upper left abdomen. Surgical intervention is recommended primarily for large cysts to prevent complications such as rupture, hemorrhage, and infection. This paper presents our experience of eleven laparoscopic procedures for non‐parasitic splenic cysts. Laparoscopic fenestration was performed in all cases, and the cyst endothelium was destroyed . All operations were accomplished successfully. The mean operative time was 56?minutes (range 40‐90?minutes). Intraoperative bleeding was 15ml (range 5‐30?ml), oral food intake was started on the first postoperative day. The median duration of postoperative hospitalization was 2.8 days (range 1–7days). There were no postoperative complications. All cases were followed up for a period of 21 months to 5.5 years, and no recurrence occurred. Laparoscopic fenestration and endothelium obliteration is an advantageous approach to large non‐parasitic splenic cysts with little postoperative pain, fast recovery, splenic tissue and splenism preservation, low complication rates, and a short hospital stay; it is easily accepted by patients. It yields favorable medium‐term results. Our study confirms that good results can be achieved with an approach of laparoscopic fenestration and endothelium obliteration for simple non‐parasitic splenic cysts.     

Microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation*

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to elucidate the feasibility of microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Methods: Thirty‐six patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation were treated using MED (30 men and six women; mean age: 45.7 years, range: 26–80 years; mean follow‐up: 24.4 months, range: 12–52 months; mean duration between the primary and revision surgery: 65.9 months, range: 1–320 months) (recurrent group). Sex‐ and age‐matched patients with primary lumbar disc herniation treated by MED served as the control group (primary group). The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for low back pain and questionnaires regarding MED. Results: The average Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores before surgery and at the final follow‐up were significantly lower in the recurrent group than in the primary group (10.8 ± 3.4 versus 15.0 ± 4.0 before surgery, P=0.001 and 25.4 ± 2.6 versus 26.8 ± 1.9 at follow‐up, P=0.013), while the average recovery rates were not significantly different between the two groups (80.3 ± 14.1% versus 84.5 ± 14.6, P=0.22). The surgical time was significantly longer for the recurrent group than for the primary group (83.0 ± 41.8 min versus 67.1 ± 18.1 min,P=0.042). Of the 18 questionnaire respondents, 17 answered that postoperative pain was milder after MED than after a standard discectomy. Conclusion: MED is a feasible surgical option for recurrent lumbar disc herniation, yielding surgical outcomes comparable to those obtained in primary lumbar disc herniation.     

Lumbar disc sequestration mimicking a tumor: Report of four cases and a literature review

BACKGROUNDDisc herniation refers to the displacement of disc material beyond its anatomical space. Disc sequestration is defined as migration of the herniated disc fragment into the epidural space, completely separating it from the parent disc. The fragment can move in upward, inferior, and lateral directions, which often causes low back pain and discomfort, abnormal sensation, and movement of lower limbs. The free disc fragments detached from the parent disc often mimic spinal tumors. Tumor like lumbar disc herniation can cause clinical symptoms similar to spinal tumors, such as lumbar soreness, pain, numbness and weakness of lower limbs, radiation pain of lower limbs, etc. It is usually necessary to diagnose the disease according to the doctor''s clinical experience, and make preliminary diagnosis and differential diagnosis with the help of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced MRI. However, pathological examination is the gold standard that distinguishes tumoral from non-tumoral status. We report four cases of disc herniation mimicking a tumor, and all the pathological results were intervertebral disc tissue.CASE SUMMARYThe first case was a 71-year-old man with low back pain accompanied by left lower extremity radiating pain for 1 year, with exacerbation over the last 2 wk. After admission, MRI revealed a circular T2-hypointense lesion in the spinal canal of the L4 vertebral segment, with enhancement on contrast-enhanced MRI suggesting neurilemmoma. The second case was a 74-year-old man with pain in both knees associated with movement limitation for 3 years, with exacerbation over the last 3 mo. MRI revealed an oval T2-hyperintense lesion in the spinal canal at the L4–5 level, with obvious peripheral enhancement on contrast-enhanced MRI. Thus, neurilemmoma was suspected. The third case was a 53-year-old man who presented with numbness and weakness of the lumbar spine and right lower extremity for 2 wk. MRI revealed a round T2-hyperintense lesion in the spinal canal at the L4–5 level, with obvious rim enhancement on contrast-enhanced MRI. Thus, a spinal tumor was suspected. The fourth case was a 75-year-old man with right lower extremity pain for 2 wk, with exacerbation over the last week. MRI revealed a round T1-isointense lesion in the spinal canal of the L3 vertebral segment and a T2-hyperintense signal from the lesion. There was no obvious enhancement on contrast-enhanced MRI, so a spinal tumor was suspected. All four patients underwent surgery and recovered to ASIA grade E on postoperative days 5, 8, 8, and 6, respectively. All patients had an uneventful postoperative course and fully recovered within 3 mo.CONCLUSIONDisc herniation mimicking a tumor is a relatively rare clinical entity and can be easily misdiagnosed as a spinal tumor. Examinations and tests should be improved preoperatively. Patients should undergo comprehensive preoperative evaluations, and the lesions should be removed surgically and confirmed by pathological diagnosis.     

单切口显微内窥镜下椎间盘切除术与传统开放椎间盘切除术治疗双节段腰椎间盘突出症的对比研究

目的 比较单切口显微内窥镜下椎间盘切除术（MED）与传统开放椎间盘切除术（OD）治疗双节段腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效.方法 2009年1月至2011年1月在我科接受椎间盘切除手术的双节段腰椎间盘突出症患者,共25例,入院时随机分为MED组（n=12）和OD组（n=13）,分析比较两组患者的手术时间、麻醉时间、住院时间、住院费用、术中出血量、摘除椎间盘重量、手术切口长度、Oswestry评分的改善情况以及临床效果满意率.结果 MED组的手术时间、麻醉时间明显高于OD组（P＜0.05）,MED组的术中出血量、切口长度、术后下床时间、住院时间、住院费用等明显小于OD组（P＜0.05）.两组术中摘除髓核组织重量无明显差别（P＞0.05）.和术前相比,术后MED组和OD组的Oswestry评分具有明显改善,但术前和术后两组间均无明显差别（P＞0.05）.两组间临床效果满意率无明显差异（P＞0.05）.结论 对于双节段腰椎间盘突出症患者,OD和单切口MED均是有效的治疗方法.但单切口MED术中出血量少、切口长度小、术后下床时间早、住院时间短、住院费用低,更加符合微创理念.     

Cervical percutaneous laser disc decompression: preliminary results of an ongoing prospective outcome study

OBJECTIVE: This study identifies the efficacy of laser disc ablation and compares the relative efficacy of Holmium2100; YAG and KTP532 laser wavelengths in the treatment of broad-based cervical disc protrusions presenting with cervical axial pain with compressive or noncompressive radicular symptoms. BACKGROUND: A preliminary report on a prospective outcome study of cervical laser disc ablation and decompression in the management of cervical disc prolapse and discographically confirmed discogenic pain in association with radicular pain. METHODS: Patients with chronic cervical pain and radicular symptoms unresponsive to conservative treatment were assessed with magnetic resonance (MR) scans. Those with broad-based disc bulge or discal degeneration were assessed with provocative discography to isolate the source of pain. Percutaneous laser disc decompression was performed as a day case procedure on 105 patients at 108 levels under X-ray control via the anterior approach with side-firing probes in patients. RESULTS: At a minimum follow up of 24 months, 51% of patients demonstrated a sustained significant clinical benefit with an additional 25% in whom functional improvement was noted. No difference in outcome was identified either with the wavelengths used or with laser annealing or painful discal tears. The cohort integrity of the study was 80%. CONCLUSION: The sustained nature of the benefit (mean 3.5 years at final follow up) after long-term preoperative symptoms (mean 3.9 years) in 76% patients rules out placebo effect. Benefits occurred independently of the wavelength of laser used.     

Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal approach to decompress the lateral recess in an elderly patient with spinal canal stenosis,herniated nucleus pulposus and pulmonary comorbidities

A 70‐year‐old man with severe pulmonary comorbidities was referred to our institution for treatment of a right L5 nerve impingement. He had suffered from spinal canal stenosis and herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) at the level of L4‐L5 for more than a year and had been treated conservatively. However, the pain could not be alleviated, and his primary care physician scheduled posterior decompression surgery. During this procedure, the anesthesiologist refused to induce general anesthesia because of the patient's very poor pulmonary condition. Subsequently, the patient was referred to us. We used a transforaminal approach with percutaneous endoscopic discectomy, with the patient under local anesthesia. First, herniated nucleus pulposus fragments at the disc level were removed. With a trephine drill, the upper part of the L5 pedicle was removed, which allowed for the extraction of dorsally migrated fragments. Following complete removal of the herniated nucleus pulposus fragments, osseous decompression was performed. The osseous endplate of L5 (anterior part of the lateral recess) was removed to enlarge the lateral recess so that decompression of the L5 nerve root was possible. The patient's lower back pain and right leg pain subsided following surgery. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy is useful for patients with severe comorbidities as it can be done with local anesthesia.     

Thoracic outlet syndrome

The diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome rests on clinical findings. A study of 21 patients with the syndrome is reported. Six of the patients underwent surgery and the remainder were treated conservatively. Surgery completely eliminated the symptoms in five patients; one patient had minor symptoms after surgery. In the patients managed conservatively, half had partial relief of symptoms and the other half did not respond to therapy. Physical therapy is initially recommended in most patients.     

Familial incidence of intervertebral disc herniation: an hypothesis suggesting that laminectomy and discectomy may be counterproductive

OBJECTIVE: To determine (1) if familial and genetic factors play a role in the genesis of disc herniation, (2) the incidence of multiple disc herniations, (3) the incidence of disc reherniation in patients treated with standard laminectomy and discectomy, and (4) to construct a hypothesis that best explains all three. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: It is known that there is a substantial incidence of disc herniation in first order relatives of patients with herniated nucleus pulposa (HNP), that multiple disc herniations are not uncommon, and that disc reherniations and repeat operations after laminectomy and discectomy range from 5 to 37%. Also, there is a recent report of a genetic defect leading to defective cross-linkage of collagen strands in patients with HNP. METHODS: Using the questionnaire method, a group of the author's patients with documented HNP treated with percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) was surveyed as to the existence of known disc herniations among first order relatives. Analysis of the author's series of 621 patients with HNP disclosed the incidence of multiple disc herniations. A comprehensive literature search provided data on reherniations and reoperations following laminectomy and discectomy. RESULTS: In 174 respondents, the number with first order relatives who had HNP was 74 (or 43%). This compares with the national incidence of HNP of 1.7%. The statistical significance yields a P = 0.0001. In the 621 patients with known HNP, the number who had more than one herniated disc was 236 (or 38%). In multiple reports in the literature, the incidence of reherniation after laminectomy and discectomy ranged from 5 to 37%. CONCLUSIONS: The simplest hypothesis explaining all of the above is that intervertebral disc herniation is due to an acute or subacute increase of intradiscal pressure acting against a congenitally weak anulus fibrosus and posterior longitudinal ligament, and therefore laminectomy and discectomy, by further weakening these structures, may be counterproductive.     

Contralateral neurologic deficits following microendoscopic lumbar surgery. Can it happen?

A contralateral neurologic deficit following microendoscopic discectomy (MED) or laminectomy (MEL) had not previously been reported. Between September 1999 and April 2004, 60 patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniations or spinal stenotic syndrome received MED or MEL at the authors' institution. Three out of 60 patients were found to exhibit a contralateral neurologic deficit following unilateral microendoscopic surgery. All three patients complained of a newly developed, contralateral neurologic deficit following their operations. One MED patient with a concomitant contralateral disc herniation developed contralateral motor and sensory deficits and required immediate open surgery. At the two-year follow-up, a residual motor deficit was noted. The other two patients (1 MED, 1MEL) with temporary sensory deficits were only treated conservatively and experienced complete recovery one week and six weeks following the operation, respectively. Surgeons should pay close attention to the possibility that contralateral neurologic deficits may occur following MED or MEL. Our reports indicate that caution should be exercised when performing microendoscopic procedures on patients with substantial dural compromise, a concomitant contralateral disc herniation, or a lateral spinal stenosis, which may be etiologies.     

腰椎间盘突出症术后椎间隙感染临床分析

目的总结腰椎间盘突出症术后椎间隙感染的临床特征,以期探讨有效的预防方法。方法对9例腰椎间盘突出术后椎间隙感染患者的临床表现、实验室检查、细菌培养、CT、MRI等临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果和结论9例患者在术后8～24d出现症状,生化检查结合MRI有助于早期诊断。6例患者保守治疗预后良好,3例后路手术治疗患者随访效果满意。     

Lumbar spine: common pathology and interventions.

Lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) and lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are common spine pathologies with different clinical presentations and interventions. HNP generally has an acute onset often without a precipitating event. Unless there is a significant or emergent neurologic deficit, nonsurgical medical management is warranted for 6 or more weeks after the onset of symptoms. If there is no improvement in 6 weeks, surgical intervention may be indicated. Microdiscectomy is the gold standard treatment for uncomplicated HNP. LSS has an insidious onset. Often, clinical presentation is a long history of intermittent back pain and gradual decrease in ambulation due to leg pain-which quickly subsides upon sitting. Medical management is the first treatment choice. If there is no improvement in the patient's condition, surgery may be necessary. As with any spine surgery, patient symptoms, clinical exam, and diagnostics must correlate. Postoperative care differs for microdiscectomy and decompressive laminectomy because the surgical pathology and interventions are different. The usual age variation of patients undergoing either of the two procedures will also change postoperative care needs. Neuroscience nurses provide ongoing patient education, and ensure a complete understanding of the proposed surgical intervention and outcome that may be expected by the patient and family. Congruent expectations between the patient and provider are vital. In addition, accurate assessment and evaluation of the patient's physical and functional progress by neuroscience nurses is of the utmost importance.     

显微内窥镜下椎间盘摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症172例临床分析

目的探讨后路显微内窥镜下行腰椎间盘摘除术(Microendoscopic discectomy,MED)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效及手术要点.方法自2001年3月起对172例腰椎间盘突出或脱出患者进行椎间盘摘除和侧隐窝及神经根管扩大术,对神经根彻底减压.结果近期随访3～12个月,平均10个月,优良160例,优良率93%,无明显并发症发生.结论显微内窥镜下椎间盘摘除术治疗单纯腰椎间盘突出症创伤少、恢复快、疗效肯定.     

内窥镜腰椎间盘术后椎间盘炎的原因及外科治疗

目的探讨腰椎间盘镜（MED）术后致腰椎间盘炎的原因、临床表现特点及微创外科治疗。方法2000年4月至2005年12月，1256例微创腰椎间盘摘除术致腰椎间盘炎6例，发病率0、63％。腰4、5椎间盘炎5例，腰5骶1椎间盘炎1例。所有患者均表现为术后疼痛持续加重，或临床症状缓解后再次出现腰骶部痉挛性剧痛和活动障碍。均伴有血沉（ESR）和C-反应蛋白（CRP）显著增高及MRI早期显著改变。6例腰椎间盘炎患者，2例采用非手术治疗，4例采用腹膜外小切口（3—4cm）椎间隙清创，自体髂骨植骨融合。结果平均随访时间19、7月，手术组的平均卧床时间3、2月，非手术组平均卧床时间7．5月，其腰痛缓解程度和椎间隙高度手术组优于非手术组。结论手术治疗是腰椎间盘炎的最好治疗方法。