Direct‐acting antiviral regimens are safe and effective in the treatment of hepatitis C in simultaneous liver–kidney transplant recipients

Hepatitis C (HCV) remains the single most common etiology of end‐stage liver disease leading to simultaneous liver/kidney transplant (SLKT) and has worse post‐transplant survival compared to non‐HCV patients. We aim to assess the effectiveness and tolerance of the all‐oral direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) agents with or without ribavirin (RBV) in the treatment of HCV recurrence post‐SLKT. Thirty‐four patients were studied retrospectively, composed predominantly of treatment‐naïve (73.5%) non‐Caucasian (61.8%) males (82.4%) infected with genotype 1a (64.7%). 94.1% reached a sustained virologic response (SVR) after 24 weeks (32/34 patients), without difference between 12 and 24 weeks of therapy. 64.7% had no clinical side effects. Three deaths occurred, all unrelated to treatment. One patient had liver rejection; tacrolimus was increased and prednisone was initiated while HCV treatment was continued and the patient ultimately achieved SVR. No liver graft losses. No kidney rejection or losses. We demonstrated that DAA combinations with or without RBV result in a remarkable SVR rate and tolerated in the majority of the studied SLKT patients. It is safe to wait to treat until post–kidney transplant and therefore increase the donor pool for these patients. Our cohort is ethnically diverse, making our results generalizable.     

DAA‐based antiviral treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C in the pre‐ and postkidney transplantation setting

DAA‐based regimens for chronic hepatitis C infection encourage treatment of “difficult‐to‐treat” cohorts. This study investigated efficacy and safety of DAA‐based regimens in HCV patients on dialysis or postkidney or liver/kidney transplantation. Twenty‐five patients treated with DAA combinations were evaluated: 10 were on dialysis (eight: hemodialysis, two: peritoneal dialysis), eight were kidney transplant recipients, and seven were liver/kidney transplant recipients. Except for one patient treated with daclatasvir ([DCV]/60 mg/QD)/simeprevir ([SMV]/150 mg/QD), the others received sofosbuvir‐based regimens ([SOF];400 mg/QD) combined with SMV:eight, DCV:13 or either ledipasvir ([LDV]90 mg/QD), ribavirin ([RBV];weight based) or pegylated interferon/RBV. HCV‐RNA was determined by Abbott RealTime (LLOQ]:12 IU/ml) or Roche AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan assay (LLOQ:15 IU/ml); treatment response evaluated every 4 weeks, at the end of treatment, and 4 and 12 weeks thereafter. Twenty‐four (96%) patients achieved SVR 12/24 (ITT‐analysis). Mean treatment duration was 15.1 ± 5.1 weeks (±SD), and two patients terminated prematurely – both reached SVR12. Six patients were hospitalized due to complications of underlying disease. One patient achieved SVR24 but was re‐infected (week 27). Kidney function remained stable; serum creatinine increased in only one patient – SOF was reduced to 400 mg/48 h. Treatment with DAA combinations in renally impaired HCV patients is highly effective and well tolerated. These findings call for further controlled trials and data from real‐life cohorts.     

Advanced donor age increases the risk of severe recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

The association between donor age and the severity of recurrent hepatitis C and, whether there is any donor age above which severity of recurrence increases significantly, were analyzed. A total of 131 liver grafts of hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐infected recipients were selected for the study. Distribution of donor age was compared between grafts with and without severe recurrence. The risk of developing severe recurrence as well as the hepatitis‐free, severe hepatitis‐free and HCV‐related graft survival was compared between different donor age groups. Mean donor age was higher for grafts with severe recurrence (P = 0.007). The risk of developing severe recurrence within 2 years post‐transplant increased with donors aged ≥50 years (RR = 1.34) and donors aged ≥70 years (RR = 1.61). Five‐year severe hepatitis‐free survival rates decreased progressively when donor age was over 50 years (P < 0.001). The study shows 50 and 70 years as the donor age cut‐off points above which the evolution of HCV‐infected recipients worsens.     

Successful treatment of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis with pegylated interferon,ribavirin and sofosbuvir after a combined kidney–liver transplantation

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) is a classical but rare and severe form of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation. Classical anti‐HCV therapy, that is pegylated‐interferon (peg‐interferon) and ribavirin, has been shown to have limited efficacy in treating FCH. Herein, we report on the first case of successful use of peg‐interferon, ribavirin, plus sofosbuvir to treat HCV‐induced FCH in a combined liver–kidney transplant patient. Antiviral therapy was given for 24 weeks. HCV clearance occurred within 4 weeks after starting therapy and was maintained until 4 weeks after the end of therapy. Antiviral tolerance was good. We conclude that the use of sofosbuvir‐based anti‐HCV therapy can be successfully used to treat FCH after a liver or combined kidney–liver transplantation.     

Use of direct‐acting agents for hepatitis C virus‐positive kidney transplant candidates and kidney transplant recipients

In some parts of the world, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a huge problem for kidney transplant candidates and kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Until 2 years ago, anti‐HCV treatment for the general population relied on pegylated alpha‐interferon plus ribavirin, but led to a sustained viral response (SVR) in <50% of cases. This treatment was contraindicated in KT patients because of acute‐rejection issues and was poorly tolerated in patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD). Over the last year, direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have entered the market and are associated in the general population with a SVR of >90%, whatever the patient's HCV genotype. In KT patients, sofosbuvir‐based therapy is associated with a SVR at nearly 100% in patients with a HCV genotype‐1 infection, with almost no side effects and only mild interference with immunosuppressive drugs. Most HCV(+) patients with ESRD are genotype 1: in that setting, a recent study reported that the association of grazoprevir/elbasvir 100/50 mg/day led to a SVR of nearly 95% with very few side effects. Thus, it is concluded that DAAs can be safely used and lead to results in KT candidates and KT patients that are as good as those observed in the nonrenal population.     

Impact of hepatitis C virus and direct acting antivirals on kidney recipients: a retrospective study

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) in kidney transplanted patients (KTx‐p) carries a high risk for a worse outcome. This retrospective study evaluates the impact of HCV and of the new direct acting antivirals (DAAs) on patient and graft outcomes in KTx patients. Forty (6.5%) of the 616 KTx‐p, who received a kidney transplantation (KTx) in our Centre had antibodies against HCV: 13 were positive for HCV RNA and received DAAs (Group A); 11 were HCV RNA positive and did not receive any treatment (Group B; n = 11); 16 were negative for HCV RNA (Group C). All Group A patients had HCV RNA negativity after 12 weeks of treatment, and 12 (92.30%) achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). Only two patients, who had proteinuria greater than 500 mg/day showed a worsening of proteinuria after antiviral therapy in Group A. Liver enzyme elevation and death were significantly more frequent in Group B than other groups. Our results support the notion that active HCV infection negatively affects kidney recipients and that DAA have a high safety and efficacy profile after KTx with no significant negative effect on allograft function, particularly in well‐functioning renal grafts.     

The Tor Vergata weaning of immunosuppression protocols in stable hepatitis C virus liver transplant patients: the 10‐year follow‐up

We report herein the 10‐year outcome of the Tor Vergata weaning off immunosuppression protocol in hepatitis C virus (HCV) liver transplant patients. Thirty‐four patients who had received a liver graft for HCV‐related cirrhosis were enrolled in a prospective study in which they were progressively weaned off immunosuppression. The primary endpoints were feasibility and safety of the weaning; the second aim was to assess fibrosis progression. At the 10‐year follow‐up, of the eight original tolerant patients, six remained IS‐free. Of the 26 individuals who could not be weaned, 22 were alive. When the baseline biopsies were compared with the 10‐year biopsies, the tolerant group showed no differences in staging, whereas the nontolerant group showed a significant increase in staging. The fibrosis progression rates calculated for the tolerant and the nontolerant groups were ?0.06 ± 0.12 and 0.1 ± 0.2, respectively (P = 0.04). Furthermore, with the last taken biopsies, nine nontolerant patients were showing frank cirrhosis versus no cirrhosis among the tolerant patients. After a 10‐year follow‐up of a Tor Vergata weaning protocol, 6/34 patients completed follow‐up without reinstitution of immunosuppression and this appeared beneficial regarding a reduction in fibrosis progression.     

Decreasing frequency and improved outcomes of hepatitis C‐related liver transplantation in the era of direct‐acting antivirals – a retrospective cohort study

Benefit of direct‐acting antivirals (DAA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) on clinical outcomes is unclear. We examined temporal trends in liver transplant (LT) listings, receipt of LT, re‐LT, and survival between pre‐DAA (2009–2012) and DAA era (2013–2016) using UNOS database. Of 32 319 first adult LT, 15 049 (47%) were performed for HCV. Trends on listing, first LT, and of re‐LT for HCV showed 23%, 20%, and 21% decrease in DAA compared to pre‐DAA era (P < 0.0001). One‐year liver graft and patient survival among HCV LT improved in DAA era (90% vs. 86% and 92% vs. 88%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Non‐HCV LT showed no improvement in survival (89% vs. 89% and 92% vs. 92.4%, P = NS). On cox regression, compared to non‐HCV LTs in DAA era, LT for HCV in pre‐DAA era had worse patient survival (HR 1.56 [1.04–2.35]). The outcome was similar when compared to LTs for HCV in DAA era and for non‐HCV in pre‐DAA era. Burden of HCV‐related LT waitlist and LT is declining in DAA era, with improved post‐transplant outcomes, more so in later than earlier DAA era. Our findings negate recent Cochrane meta‐analysis on DAA therapy and encourage studies to examine HCV clinical outcomes outside LT setting.     

Cost‐effectiveness analysis of antiviral treatment in liver transplant recipients with HCV infection

Within 5–10 years, 20–40% of hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐infected liver transplant recipients can be expected to develop cirrhosis. Here, cost‐effectiveness of antiviral therapy was assessed. A Markov model was developed to simulate disease progression and calculate outcome and costs of treatment. In the baseline analysis, Peg‐IFN/RBV treatment prevented organ loss/death, gained quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALYs) and undercut the limit of cost‐effectiveness of €50 000/QALY with an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio of approximately €40 400/QALY and €21 000/QALY for HCV genotype 1 and 2/3 patients, respectively. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis testing modified model parameters according to extreme data described in the literature confirmed cost‐effectiveness for a lower or higher rate of fibrosis progression, increased non‐HCV‐related mortality, lower limits of utilities, a time horizon of 30 years, and additional costs in the year of death. On the other hand, cost‐effectiveness was lost for patients with genotype 1 in case of doubled antiviral or life‐time costs or an increased discount rate of 7%. New treatment strategies for HCV genotype 1 infected patients remained on the same level cost‐effective, if additional costs did not exceed €10 774 per 10% sustained virologic response gain. We conclude that Peg‐IFN/RBV treatment is cost‐effective post transplant. This may support treatment decision in individual cases.     

Antiviral re‐treatment of IFN‐Ribavirin non‐responders for recurrent post‐transplantation hepatitis C

Yedibela S, Demir R, Melling N, Aydin Ü, Schuppan D, Müller V, Hohenberger W, Schönleben F. Antiviral re‐treatment of IFN‐Ribavirin non‐responders for recurrent post‐transplantation hepatitis C.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 131–135. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) plus ribavirin (RIB) and PEG‐IFN monotherapy after unsuccessful initial therapy with interferon‐α2b (IFN) plus RIB after recurrent post‐transplantation hepatitis C. Methods: Twenty‐four patients with either no response (n = 10) or relapse (n = 14) after treatment with IFN plus RIB were prospectively randomized in the two treatment arms: 1) PEG‐IFN monotherapy at a dosage of 0.8 μg/kg per week (n = 12) and 2) PEG‐IFN (0.8 μg/kg per week) plus RIB (800–1200 mg/d) (n = 12). Results: Twenty‐one patients (86%) were treated for at least six months. Three patients are still being treated. At the end of therapy, 18 patients (75%) were HCV RNA negative. Five (45%) patients in PEG‐IFN and five (50%) in PEG‐IFN plus RIB arms had sustained virological response. Two patients (10%) died from recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. The histologic activity indices significantly improved in both treatment arms. In the PEG‐IFN arm, one patient experienced an acute rejection and discontinued therapy. Conclusions: Both treatment arms showed to be effective, well tolerated and lead to an improvement in histologic outcome. Because of lower rates in side effects and equal outcome, PEG‐IFN monotherapy is an adequate option for antiviral re‐treatment.     

One‐year vaccination against hepatitis B virus with a MPL‐vaccine in liver transplant patients for HBV‐related cirrhosis

Conflicting results have been reported on vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) as a prophylaxis against viral recurrence after liver transplantation. We investigated the efficacy of 1‐year, monthly vaccination using an adjuvant 3‐deacylated monophosphoryl‐lipid‐A (MPL) recombinant S vaccine initially administered together with hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIg) in 18 patients transplanted for HBV‐related cirrhosis. All received 12 vaccine doses (HBsAg, 20 mcg plus MPL, 50 mcg): the initial six doses (phase I) were administered within 7 days after intravenous HBIg (2000 IU), while the last 6 (phase II) following HBIg withdrawal. All patients received lamivudine during the study. Anti‐HBs titers were determined before each dose and then for 1 year after vaccination. After phase I anti‐HBs titers were greater than 100 IU/l in all patients and in three (16.6%) were greater than 500 IU/l. After phase II 10 patients (55.5%) achieved anti‐HBs titers greater than 100 IU/l and five (27.7%) greater than 500 IU/l. One year after vaccination eight patients (44.4%) maintained anti‐HBs titers greater than 100 IU/l, with a median titer of 234 IU/l (102–1205), and 2 (11.1%) greater than 500 IU/l. One‐year extended monthly vaccination with a MPL‐adjuvant recombinant vaccine induces a sustained protective anti‐HBs response in approximately half of transplant recipients.     

Fibrosing Cholestatic Hepatitis in HIV/HCV Co‐Infected Transplant Patients—Usefulness of Early Markers After Liver Transplantation

We characterized fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) in a large cohort of HIV/HCV co‐infected patients. Between 1999 and 2008, 59 HIV infected patients were transplanted for end‐stage liver disease due to HCV. Eleven patients (19%) developed FCH within a mean period of 7 months [2–27] after liver transplantation (LT). At Week 1 post‐LT, the mean HCV viral load was higher in the FCH group: 6.13 log₁₀ IU/mL ± 1.30 versus 4.9 log₁₀ IU/mL ± 1.78 in the non‐FCH group, p = 0.05. At the onset of acute hepatitis after LT, activity was moderate to severe in 8/11 HIV+/HCV+ patients with FCH (73%) versus 13/28 (46%) HIV+/HCV+ non‐FCH (p = 0.007) patients. A complete virological response to anti‐HCV therapy was observed in 2/11 (18%) patients. Survival differed significantly between the two groups (at 3 years, 67% in non‐FCH patients versus 15% in FCH patients, p = 0.004). An early diagnosis of FCH may be suggested by the presence of marked disease activity when acute hepatitis is diagnosed and when a high viral load is present. The initiation of anti‐HCV therapy should be considered at this point.     

The Italian compassionate use of sofosbuvir observational cohort study for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C: clinical and virological outcomes

Direct antivirals are available for treating recurrent hepatitis C (RHC). This study reported outcomes of 424 patients with METAVIR F3–F4 RHC who were treated for 24 weeks with sofosbuvir/ribavirin and followed for 12 weeks within the Italian sofosbuvir compassionate use program. In 55 patients, daclatasvir or simeprevir were added. Child–Pugh class and model of end stage liver disease (MELD) scores were evaluated at baseline and 36 weeks after the start of therapy. The sustained viral response (SVR) was 86.7% (316/365) in patients who received sofosbuvir/ribavirin and 98.3% (58/59) in patients who received a second antiviral (P < 0.01). In patients treated with sofosbuvir/ribavirin, a significant difference in SVR was observed between patients diagnosed with METAVIR F4 (211/250; 84.4%), METAVIR F3 (95/105; 90.5%) and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (10/10; 100%) (P = 0.049). A significant association was found between patients who worsened from Child–Pugh class A and who experienced viral relapse (4/26 vs. 8/189, P = 0.02). In patients with a baseline MELD score <15, a significant association was found between maintaining a final MELD score <15 and the achievement of SVR (187/219 vs. 6/10, P = 0.031). This real‐world study indicates that sofosbuvir/ribavirin treatment for 24 weeks was effective, and the achievement of SVR was associated with a reduced probability of developing worsening liver function.