Are anxiety disorders more frequent in subjects with eating disorders?

OBJECTIVE: We designed a controlled study comparing referred women with an eating disorder (ED) to a matched normal control group to answer the following questions: what are the frequencies of anxiety disorders (AD) in anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN), according to DSM-IV criteria? Are AD significantly more frequent among women with an ED than among women from the community? METHOD: We assessed frequencies of six specific AD among 271 women with a current diagnosis of AN or BN and 271 controls, using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), French DSM-IV version. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of both the AN and the BN subjects had a lifetime comorbidity with at least one AD, significantly more (p<0.001) than the percentage of controls with an AD. Prevalence was significantly higher in the ED groups than in controls for most types of AD, and between 41.8% and 53.3% of comorbid cases had an AD preceding the onset of the ED. CONCLUSION: Evidence that AD are significantly more frequent in subjects with ED than in the community has important etiological and therapeutic implications.     

Are seizures more frequent in asthmatic children?

Asthma and epilepsy have been suspected to be related to each other for a long time. To determine the frequency of seizures occurring in all asthmatic children referred to the teaching hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) for two consecutive years, we conducted the following study. 16 out of 202 cases had previous history of non-febrile seizures (7.9%). Five patients (2.5%) had only a single seizure, and the remaining (5.4%) had recurrent attacks. All cases had generalized tonic-clonic type of seizures. One of the cases had a prolonged seizure (status epilepticus) lasting for more than 30 minutes. We concluded that the occurrence of seizure in our asthmatic patients was far more frequent than that in the general population.     

Are low target blood pressure goals justified in persons with diabetes mellitus?

Hypertension is common in patients with diabetes and is a major risk factor for development and progression of the macro- and microvascular complications seen in diabetes. The Joint National Committee VI recommendation for goal blood pressure is less than 130/85 mm Hg in diabetics—a more aggressive target than in nondiabetic patients. Data over the past decade support these aggressive goals, especially for cardiovascular and renal outcomes and overall mortality. In addition, in diabetics, blood pressure appears to be a continuous risk factor for these outcomes without evidence of a J-point effect. While these goals are rarely obtained in diabetic patients, studies demonstrate that they are achievable with attention to detail and use of multiple antihypertensive agents.     

Are elderly patients with diabetes being overtreated in French long-term-care homes?

AimIn France, diabetes prevalence and ageing of the population are both on the increase, yet little information on diabetes in elderly patients living in geriatric institutions is available. Moreover, institutionalized diabetic patients are not included in the French recommendations for the management of diabetes in the elderly. For this reason, the aim of the present study was to evaluate diabetes management in older, institutionalized patients.MethodsThe medical records of 100 diabetic patients, aged 65 years and over, and living in seven geriatric institutions in the Côte d’Or region of France, were studied from May 2008 to January 2009.ResultsPrevalence of diabetes in these seven geriatric institutions was 15.46 ± 4.9%, higher than in the general population. The diabetic patients had a mean age of 81.85 ± 11.93 years, and 32% had glycated haemoglobin (HbA_1c) less or equal to 6.5%, indicating a high risk of severe hypoglycaemia. A diet for diabetes was prescribed in 54% of the patients, but HbA_1c levels did not differ between patients following and not following the diet (7.26 ± 1.36% vs 7.11 ± 1.10%, respectively; P = 0.27). Creatinine was assessed in 87% of the patients, and 16% were ophthalmologically followed-up. Daily capillary blood glucose monitoring was performed in 100% of the patients taking insulin and in 17% of those taking oral antidiabetic treatment (P < 0.0001).ConclusionOur data show that, among older institutionalized patients, the prevalence of diabetes is high and the control of diabetes too tight, with a potential risk of hypoglycaemia. Antidiabetic treatment should be reduced when the HbA_1c value is less than 7.5% in this frail and functionally dependent population. Furthermore, a diabetic diet, prescribed for more than half this population, is useless for glycaemic control and may even impinge on quality of life.     

Which basal insulin should be used in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?

The initiation of insulin therapy is a significant event for patients with diabetes and the physicians who care for them. Reluctance to begin insulin is multifactorial, with major stumbling blocks being the perceived complexity of insulin and fear of hypoglycemia. Recent guidelines supporting earlier introduction of insulin to achieve glycemic goals in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus will require that traditional approaches to insulin therapy be altered and a new paradigm be introduced into clinical practice. In particular, an understanding of the role of basal insulin in the regulation of glucose and the development of strategies to implement basal insulin therapy can provide a transition that is rational and highly effective in most patients. The strategy also offers a unique approach to diabetes education that permits a focused and patient-specific correction to glucose abnormalities.     

What values should be used to diagnose microalbuminuria in patients with diabetes mellitus?

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) associated with increased morbi-mortality. The identification of individuals at high risk for DN will make its prevention more effective. Urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) is still the best marker for DN development and progression. It is also a major risk factor for macrovascular disease. High-normal albuminuria (< 20 microg/min) is still associated with development of micro- and macroalbuminuria. UAER has a continuous relationship with the development of renal and cardiovascular disease, without a cutoff point from which there is a highly increased risk. However, in clinical practice we need a reference value in order to guide the patient's treatment. Some evidence indicates values of UAER between 5 and 10 microg/min as a new cutoff point for the diagnosis of microalbuminuria. In conclusion, the association between UAER and the renal and cardiovascular outcomes seems to be continuous and is already present with UAER within the normal range. The adoption of a UAER value around 5 to 10 microg/min as risky could identify patients that should receive earlier and more aggressive treatment of modifiable risk factors.     

Peritoneal adhesions and intestinal obstructions in patients with familial Mediterranean fever--are they more frequent?

OBJECTIVE: Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is characterized by recurrent episodes of peritonitis. A controversy exists as to whether intestinal obstruction due to peritoneal adhesions is more common among FMF patients compared with healthy controls. The aim of the study was to estimate the rate of spontaneous or postsurgical small-bowel obstruction (SBO) in FMF patients. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 560 FMF patients followed in our clinic for the occurrence of spontaneous SBO. We also assessed the occurrence of postappendectomy intestinal obstruction among 89 FMF patients compared with 417 individuals without FMF who underwent an appendectomy without other abdominal surgery in the same medical center. RESULTS: Ten of 471 FMF patients (2.1%) developed spontaneous SBO, 8 of whom required laparotomy and adhesiolysis. Six of 89 FMF patients (6.7%) who underwent appendectomy developed SBO. None of the non-FMF patients developed SBO. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective study showed that FMF patients are at a higher risk than healthy individuals for developing SBO either spontaneously or as a postsurgical complication. Physicians should be alert to this possible complication when FMF patients arrive at the emergency room.     

Coagulation status in coronary artery disease patients with type II diabetes mellitus compared with non-diabetic coronary artery disease patients using the PFA-100® and ROTEM®

Previous investigations in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) revealed differences in thromboelastographic parameters indicating different states of coagulability. The aim of the present study was to investigate the coagulation status of patients with documented CAD and type II diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease with the PFA-100® and the ROTEM®. No differences were found in platelet function as measured with collagen/epinephrine (263.6 ± 70.6 s vs. 254.6 ± 65.3 s) and collagen/ADP cartridges (105.3 ± 63.2 s vs. 90.6 ± 47.3 s) in CAD patients with DM and CAD patients without DM. Measured with the EXTEM reagent of the ROTEM®, mean maximum clot elasticity (MCE) in patients with CAD and DM (233.6 ± 86.9) was significantly longer than in CAD patients without DM (186.7 ± 54.5), (p = 0.03). A similar result was seen using the INTEM reagent; patients with CAD and DM (234.4 ± 83.9) showed a higher value for MCE than CAD patients without DM (190.8 ± 57.8) which was of borderline significance (p = 0.053). Moreover, a weak trend for higher maximum clot firmness (MCF) was seen in CAD patients with DM compared with CAD patients without DM with the EXTEM reagent (68.1 ± 7.5 vs. 63.6 ± 8.6, p = 0.08) and the INTEM reagent (68.4 ± 7.2 vs. 64.1 ± 8.2, p = 0.09). The ROTEM® analysis indicates increased coagulability in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus compared to non-diabetic CAD patients. Moreover, the ROTEM® device seems to be an appropriate and easy-to-use tool to describe the coagulation status in these patients groups.