Combination chemotherapy of carboplatin and gemcitabine against solid tumors: a phase I trial

Background. Some trials have suggested that the combination of gemcitabine and platinum compounds can have a synergistic effect on several solid tumors, but, at present, the data concerning carboplatin-gemcitabine combinations are not sufficient to allow the planning of phase II trials. The present phase I trial was planned to define the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicity of a carboplatin-gemcitabine combination. Methods. Thirty-two patients with advanced, pretreated solid tumors were treated with carboplatin on day 1 and gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The starting doses of carboplatin and gemcitabine were 3.5 mg/ml per min (area under the curve; AUC), and 600 mg/m², respectively. The doses of the two agents were alternately increased to 4, 4.5, and 5 mg/ml per min and to 800 and 960 mg/m², respectively. At each dose level, three patients were initially enrolled. If one of them experienced grade IV hematological toxicity or grade III–IV nonhematological toxicity (with the exception of alopecia), an additional three patients were enrolled at the same dose level. If two or more patients experienced grade IV hematological toxicity or grade III–IV non-hematological toxicity (with the exception of alopecia), the maximum tolerated dose was considered to have been reached, and the dose below this was recommended for further studies. All patients were evaluated weekly for toxicity and after every two courses of chemotherapy for response. Results. Dose-limiting toxicity was hematological, and the maximum tolerated doses were 4.5 mg/ml per min for carboplatin and 800 mg/m² for gemcitabine. The activity of the carboplatin/gemcitabine combination was encouraging, with a 21.9% response rate (7/32), three complete disease regressions, and a median time to progression of 30 weeks. The gemcitabine doses of day 15 or days 8 and 15 were omitted for hematological toxicity in 57 (50%) and 17 (14.9%) courses of chemotherapy, while no courses of chemotherapy were delayed for grade III–IV hematological or nonhematological toxicity. Conclusion. The maximum tolerated doses suggested by this trial are lower than those in other similar phase I trials, but they are consistent with those reported by most of the trials investigating gemcitabine either in combination with cisplatin or in heavily pretreated patients. Carboplatin 4.5 mg/ml per min on day 1 plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days may represent a promising schedule for further phase II trials. Received: January 29, 2001 / Accepted: September 13, 2001     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 5-fluorouracil administered by 5-day continuous infusion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE: In this study the maximum tolerated dose of 5-fluorouracil administered by 5-day (120-h) continuous infusion every 4 weeks was investigated and the pharmacokinetics in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were evaluated. METHODS: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma no longer amenable to established forms of treatment were eligible for the study. The starting dose of 5-fluorouracil was 300 mg/m(2) per day and doses were escalated in 50 mg/m(2) per day increments in successive cohorts of three new patients if tolerated. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed at the time of the first course of therapy. RESULTS: Enrolled in the study were 20 patients. The maximum tolerated dose was 500 mg/m(2) per day and the dose-limiting toxicity was stomatitis. Other toxicities were mild and well tolerated. Age, gender and associated liver cirrhosis were significant factors influencing 5-fluorouracil clearance. With regard to biochemical parameters, serum alanine aminotransferase and cholesterol levels were correlated with 5-fluorouracil clearance. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose for 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in hepatocellular carcinoma patients was 500 mg/m(2) per day. The recommended dose for phase II studies using this schedule is 450 mg/m(2) per day. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic data obtained in this study may be useful in determining chemotherapy dosage adjustments for reduction of toxicity.     

The in vivo immunomodulatory effects of recombinant interferon gamma plus recombinant tumor necrosis factor-alfa

We conducted a phase I study in which an intramuscular injection of interferon gamma (IFN gamma) at 10, 50, or 100 micrograms/m2 was followed 5 minutes later by an intramuscular injection of 10, 50, or 100 micrograms/m2 of tumor necrosis factor-alfa (TNF alpha) at another site every other day for 20 days (10 doses). The addition of TNF alpha to IFN gamma reduced both the magnitude and duration of IFN gamma-mediated effects on peripheral blood monocyte expression of Fc receptors (FcRs) and HLA-DR and production of hydrogen peroxide. This inhibition was related to the dose of TNF alpha. On the other hand, TNF alpha and IFN gamma appeared to have an additive stimulatory effect on the production of neopterin by monocytes. The highest serum levels of neopterin were detected in patients who received the highest doses of both IFN gamma and TNF alpha. Thus, conflicting conclusions regarding the effect of the combination on immune activation are possible. If the activation of peripheral blood monocytes is the appropriate surrogate measure of the immune enhancement of the combination, then the simultaneous administration of IFN gamma and TNF alpha is ineffective, and future attempts to exploit the potential additive or synergistic effects of this combination of cytokines in humans may need to explore sequential administration schemata. On the other hand, if serum neopterin levels are a more reliable index of immune activation, simultaneous administration of 100 micrograms/m2 IFN gamma and 50 micrograms/m2 TNF alpha every other day (the maximally tolerated dose [MTD]) should be used in phase II testing. This dilemma points out the limitations of currently available methods of human immune assessment and the inadequacies in our capacity to gauge what particular immune measure or set of measures predict for in vivo antitumor effects.     

Phase I trial of 5-fluorouracil,leucovorin, and cisplatin in combination

Summary The ongoing evaluation of combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin in several tumors prompted a phase I clinical trial of cisplatin with 5-FU modulated by leucovorin. A total of 26 patients were treated with varying doses of 5-FU by continuous i.v. infusion for 5 days; 200 mg/m² leucovorin was given by daily bolus injection for 5 days; and 20 mg/m² cisplatin was infused over 2 h on each day of treatment. Courses were repeated every 21–28 days. The starting dose of 5-FU was 300 mg/m². Poor-risk patients (extensive prior radiation, performance status of 2 or worse) did not tolerate the initial dose; the maximum tolerated dose of 5-FU in this group was 200 mg/m² daily. Good-risk patients tolerated 300 mg/m², but a majority had excessive toxicity at higher doses. The dose-limiting toxicity was gastrointestinal (mucositis/diarrhea) and/or myelosuppression; additional side effects included were nausea and vomiting (grade 2) and ataxia (one patient). Among 13 patients with colorectal cancer, 4 partial responses were observed. The marked reduction in the tolerable dose of 5-FU occasioned by the addition of modulating doses of leucovorin is noteworthy. The response observed support further investigation of this regimen in phase II trials.     

A phase I clinical trial of recombinant DNA gamma interferon

Recombinant gamma interferon (r-GIFN) demonstrates in vitro and in vivo characteristics that contrast with those of alpha and beta interferons. It has relatively weak antiviral properties, yet relatively potent immunomodulatory effects. A phase I trial was performed with r-GIFN (specific activity 2.6 X 10(6) IU/mg protein), administered as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion over 24 hours for five days (Cl X 5) and repeated every 28 days. This schedule was chosen based on the short half-life of r-GIFN in animal systems and the in vitro augmentation of biologic effects with continuous exposure to interferons. Twenty-one patients with refractory solid tumors received 46 evaluable courses of therapy. The dose-limiting toxicities included fever, flu-like symptoms, cardiovascular toxicity, and neurotoxicity. The cardiovascular toxicity included hypotension and one episode of cardiac ischemia with chest pain. Neurotoxicity consisted of lethargy and confusion. These toxicities were reversible, and although dose-limiting, occurred sporadically throughout all dosage levels. Mild to moderately severe non-dose-limiting toxicities included nausea and vomiting, leukopenia, and liver function abnormalities. Other infrequent toxicities included hypocalcemia, diarrhea, constipation, and alopecia. The maximally tolerated dose of r-GIFN on this schedule is 0.5 X 10(6) IU/m2/d. Partial responses were seen in one patient with metastatic melanoma and in one patient with renal cell carcinoma. Toxicity and antitumor activity were seen at doses where interferon serum levels could not be detected by radioimmunoassay. In addition, the toxicity and antitumor activity seen were at much lower doses than previously described for shorter infusion schedules of other recombinant gamma interferon preparations. Differences in biologic activity of interferon preparations and/or differences in scheduling may account for this variability. Although this study defines a recommended phase II dose of r-GIFN based on the maximally tolerated dose, the optimal therapeutic index may exist at a lower dosage level.     

Biological Modification of protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil with weekly leucovorin

A clinical trial was designed to find the maximally tolerated dose of weekly leucovorin (LV) that could be combined with 4 weeks of protracted infusion (PI) of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) at a fixed dose of 200 mg/m2. A total of 36 patients with disseminated gastrointestinal malignancies were treated; 9 either progressed or died before receiving 4 weeks of treatment leaving 27 patients evaluable for toxicity and response. 5FU was given as a protracted infusion using an ambulatory infusion pump and indwelling venous access. LV doses included 20, 25, 50, and 75 mg/m2 given as an i.v. push at the time of weekly pump fill with 5FU. In all, 72% of the patients tolerated LV at 20 mg/m2 for 4 continuous weeks, whereas the higher doses required treatment rests prior to 4 weeks. The dose-limiting toxicity at all doses was stomatitis. No significant myelosuppression was seen; diarrhea was infrequent. Overall, 40% of the patients with measurable cancer had partial responses. In view of evidence of biologic and therapeutic effects of these weekly doses of 20 mg/m2 LV with 200 mg/m2 5FU per day given as a protracted infusion over 4 weeks, phase II trials and multimodality studies for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies are being initiated at our institution using this dose and schedule.     

A phase I study of cisplatinum plus 5-fluorouracil in modulation with citrovorum factor in metastatic colorectal carcinoma

A phase I study of 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2/week and folinic acid 500 mg/m2/week on day 1 and cisplatin administered weekly on day 2 was carried out on 30 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma of which 20 patients were pretreated with 5-fluorouracil. The first group of patients received cisplatin at the dose of 5 mg/m2/week. Cisplatin was then escalated to 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 mg/m2/week for subsequent groups of patients. Gastrointestinal side-effects were the dose-limiting toxicity. A therapy related death was seen at the dose of 35 mg/m2/week of cisplatin. The maximally tolerated dose of cisplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil and citrovorum factor is 20 mg/m2/week. The optimally tolerated dose of 5-fluorouracil is 400 mg/m2/week in modulation with citrovorum factor 500 mg/m2/week. The recommended doses for a phase II study are cisplatin 20 mg/m2/week, 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2/week, and citrovorum factor 500 mg/m2/week.     

Phase I study of MST-16

Phase I study with a new oral anticancer agents. MST-16 (Sobuzoxane), was conducted by 3 administration schedules: single, 5 consecutive days and 10-15 consecutive days. No toxicity was observed in the single administration at doses escalated up to 1,500 mg/m2. Dose-dependent leukopenia was observed from 560 mg/m2/day in consecutive 5 day administration, and median days to the nadir and recovery were about 2 and 1 week, respectively. GI-disorders were also observed sporadically from 800 mg/m2/day. One patient with Hodgkin's disease receiving 1,000 mg/m2/day achieved complete response. Consecutive administration for 10-15 days was carried out at a dose of 800 mg/m2/day. Six out of 7 evaluable patients demonstrated leukopenia, and all 2 patients treated for 15 days experienced leukopenia with a nadir corresponding to grade 3. Median days to nadir and recovery were both about 2 weeks. Doses recommended for phase II study were considered to be 1,600 mg/body/day for 5 days and 1,200 mg/body/day for 10-14 days.     

Preclinical and phase I study of oxaliplatin and topotecan in combination in human cancer.

BACKGROUND: DNA damage caused by platinum agents is frequently followed by induction of topoisomerase I, providing a rationale for use of platinum-based compounds with topoisomerase I inhibitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the effect of a sequential schedule of oxaliplatin on day I and topotecan on days 2-5, in human colon and ovarian cancer cells in vitro, in nude mice bearing human cancer xenografts and finally in cancer patients in a phase I trial. RESULTS: We demonstrated a supra-additive effect of this combination on inhibition of colony formation and induction of apoptosis in vitro. We then demonstrated that the two agents in combination markedly inhibit tumor growth in nude mice. We translated these results into a clinical setting, conducting a phase I study in cancer patients with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on day 1 and topotecan at doses escalating from 0.5 to 1.5 mg/m2 on days 2-5. Sixty cycles of treatment were administered to 18 patients affected prevalently by ovarian and colorectal cancer. Combination with topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 caused a dose-limiting toxicity. Therefore the maximum tolerated dose of topotecan was 1.25 mg/m2, at which six patients experienced a mild hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity. We also obtained evidence of clinical activity, particularly in ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a solid biological and clinical rationale for a phase II trial at the recommended doses of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and topotecan 1.25 mg/m2, possibly in ovarian cancer patients.     

Prospective phase II trial of iriontecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in combination as salvage therapy for advanced colorectal cancer

Irinotecan (CPT11) has established activity in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer without cross-resistance with established 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid-based therapy. This phase II study was conducted to establish the efficacy and tolerance of combination treatment with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil as salvage treatment for this disease. Open phase II trial of CPT11 180 mg/m2 on day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2, and 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 loading dose followed by 600 mg/m2 infusion on days 1 and 2. Treatment was continued until progression or limiting toxicity. Responders could proceed to surgical resection of residual disease. Thirty-nine patients from 2 institutions received a total of 287 cycles of therapy (median 7 cycles/patient). Eight patients achieved an objective response (7 for liver metastasis and 1 for lung metastasis), and an additional 12 obtained stabilization of disease or minor responses (MR); of these patients, 8 with liver metastasis (7 partial response and 1 MR) underwent hepatic resection of metastases and all them obtained a complete response. The median duration of response was 14 months, and the median survival was 11 months. Hematologic toxicity (neutropenia) was the most common serious side effect (29% of patients in 2% of cycles), but significant fever developed in only 4 patients. Grade III diarrhea was experienced in at least 1 cycle by 10% of patients. The results of this schedule compare favorably with previously reported experience of a phase I study designed to establish the dose of CPT11. Efficacy in this poor prognosis group of patients is very encouraging, and the schedule is well tolerated by even previously treated patients.     

A phase I study to determine the safety,pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a dual VEGFR and FGFR inhibitor,brivanib, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

BackgroundThis study was designed to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of brivanib in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors.Patients and methodsNinety patients enrolled in this two-part, phase I open-label study of oral brivanib alaninate. The primary objectives of this study were (in part A) dose-limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the lowest biologically active dose level and (in part B) the optimal dose/dose range. The secondary objectives of this study were preliminary evidence of antitumor activity, PK and PD.ResultsAcross part A (open-label dose escalation and MTD) and part B (open-label dose optimization), 68 patients received brivanib alaninate. Brivanib demonstrated a manageable toxicity profile at doses of 180–800 mg. Most toxic effects were mild. Systemic exposure of the active moiety brivanib increased linearly ≤1000 mg/day. The MTD was 800 mg/day. Forty-four patients were treated at the MTD: 20 with 800 mg continuously, 11 with 800 mg intermittently and 13 with 400 mg b.i.d. doses. Partial responses were confirmed in two patients receiving brivanib ≥600 mg. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated statistically significant decreases in parameters reflecting tumor vascularity and permeability after multiple doses in the 800-mg continuous q.d. and 400-mg b.i.d. dose cohorts.ConclusionIn patients with advanced/metastatic cancer, brivanib demonstrates promising antiangiogenic and antitumor activity and manageable toxicity at doses ≤800 mg orally q.d., the recommended phase II study dose.     

Phase I-II study: triciribine (tricyclic nucleoside phosphate) for metastatic breast cancer

Triciribine is a purine analogue which inhibits DNA and protein synthesis. We performed two studies to define its activity against metastatic breast cancer. The first study was a phase II study in 14 patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received two or fewer chemotherapy treatments. The treatment schedule was triciribine 20 mg/m² per day by 24-h infusion (CI) daily for 5 days every 6 weeks as recommended by a previous open phase I trial. When neither response nor toxicity was seen in the phase II trial, we assumed the starting dose was too low for this group of patients with good performance status and repeated the phase I trial in patients with metastatic breast cancer with good performance status. The starting dose was 35 mg/m² per day using the same 5-day CI schedule, and starting doses were increased in subsequent cohorts of three patients in increments of 5 mg/m² until toxicity occurred. In the initial (phase II) study, one patient had stable disease for 18 weeks (three courses), the remainder progressed. There were no significant toxic effects. In the subsequent phase I study, ten patients were treated until the study was closed The maximum dose was 40 mg/m². Two patients died, one each at the 35 and 40 mg/m² levels, respectively, 3 months and 6 weeks after their last course, one without interveing disease progression. Both had severe hypertriglyceridemia (18- and 21-fold elevation) and severe fatigue. At postmortem examination, one had congestive cardiomyopathy, and the other had severe pancreatitis and hypothyroidism. One patient had severe exacerbation of psoriasis which made her bedridden for more than 30 days. Four patients had hyperglycemia. Plasma pharmacology studies showed erratic drug levels, presumably related to enterohepatic circulation. Postmortem pharmacology studies showed residual drug present as long as 12 weeks after the last dose. We conclude that triciribine is ineffective at all doses tested and at doses of 35 mg/m² has unacceptable toxic effects.This work was performed under National Cancer Institute contract 1-CM-57739     

Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of continuous infusion (6S)-folinic acid and bolus 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced cancer.

Twenty-seven patients with advanced cancer were entered in a phase I study of bolus i.v. 5-fluorouracil at a dose of 370 mg/m2/day for 5 days combined with a continuous i.v. infusion of (6S)-folinic acid for 5.5 days, starting 24 h in advance of the first 5-fluorouracil dose. The dose of (6S)-folinic acid was escalated in cohorts of patients from 250 mg/m2/day to a maximum of 1000 mg/m2/day. The pharmacokinetics of (6S)-folinic acid were studied in the 3 patients given 250 mg/m2/day and in 6 patients given 1000 mg/m2/day. The mean steady-state plasma concentrations of (6S)-folinic acid and its principal metabolite (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolate at the 250 mg/m2/day dose were 2.7 and 5.1 microM, respectively. Both concentrations were comparable to the concentrations produced when (6S)-folinic acid was administered as half of a (6R,S)-folinic acid mixture (E. M. Newman et al., Cancer Res., 49:5755-5760, 1989). At the 1000 mg/m2/day dose of (6S)-folinic acid, the concentration of (6S)-folinic acid was 15.3 microM, more than the 4-fold increase predicted by linear pharmacokinetics, while the concentration of (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolate was only 16.5 microM. The change in the ratio of the parent compound to its metabolite was accounted for by a decrease in the nonrenal clearance of (6S)-folinic acid, probably indicating saturation of its metabolism. The toxicities observed in this phase I trial, including stomatitis, diarrhea, neutropenia, and anemia, did not differ in nature or severity from those produced by 5-fluorouracil and (6R,S)-folinic acid when administered on the same schedule. Finally, the degree of toxicity did not appear to depend on the dose of (6S)-folinic acid over the range of doses tested.     

Biological and clinical effects of the combination of beta- and gamma-interferons administered as a 5-day continuous infusion

A phase I trial involving continuous infusion of both beta- and gamma-interferon (IFN-beta and IFN-gamma) was conducted in 20 patients in order to determine whether combinations of high doses of IFN-beta and IFN-gamma were tolerable when administered under conditions which mimic conditions of in vitro antiproliferative studies. Patients received a 5-day continuous infusion of IFN-beta/IFN-gamma, followed by a 9-day rest period. Two cycles were administered. Doses of IFN-beta/IFN-gamma were escalated between 4 dose levels, with 5 patients per dose level. Dose-dependent side effects, consisting primarily of constitutional symptoms typical of those experienced with IFN, were observed. The maximally tolerated dose of continuous IFN-beta/IFN-gamma infusion was 3 x 10(6) units of IFN-beta and 200 micrograms of IFN-gamma. Dose-limiting side effects consisted of severe headache, fatigue, fever, and hepatic toxicity. No clinical responses were observed. Serum IFN was measurable only at the highest 3 dose levels. Only 5 patients (4 at the highest dose level) had total serum levels which exceeded 50 laboratory units/ml (55, 63, 800, 800, and 550 laboratory units/ml, respectively). In order to confirm the biological effectiveness of this schedule, we measured IFN-inducible proteins prior to therapy, 24 h after the initiation of the infusion, and at the completion of the 5-day infusion. 2'-5'-Oligoadenylate synthetase, serum beta 2-microglobulin, neopterin, and p78 levels all increased significantly, and serum tryptophan decreased significantly within 24 h after the initiation of treatment (P less than 0.0001). A dose-response effect was observed for serum beta 2-microglobulin, neopterin, and p78 (P less than 0.02). We retrospectively compared the results of this trial with those of another IFN-beta/IFN-gamma trial in which IFN-beta and IFN-gamma were administered by i.v. bolus. Within the limitations of a retrospective comparison, continuous infusion was less well tolerated than our previous schedule of bolus administration 3 times/week. However, the continuous infusion schedule appeared to be more effective in enhancing 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase levels in mononuclear cells. We conclude that tolerable doses of IFN-beta and IFN-gamma do not result in serum IFN levels which produce significant synergistic antiproliferative responses in vitro. This study and other findings suggest that, unless higher doses can be achieved, combinations of IFN-beta and IFN-gamma are unlikely to have significant therapeutic activity.     

A phase I study of gemcitabine/cisplatin/etoposide in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of combined cisplatin, etoposide, and gemcitabine in patients with small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: We undertook a phase I study in patients with either extensive small-cell lung cancer with or without prior chemotherapy, or limited disease who had progressed or recurred despite prior treatment. Patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, etoposide 50-100 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 followed by oral administration of 50-100 mg/m2 days 2 5, and gemcitabine at either 800 or 1000 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8, on a 3 weekly cycle. RESULTS: We treated 20 patients, 14 at the 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine dose level, and six at the 1000 mg/m2 dose level. The protocol initially used an etoposide dose of 100 mg/m2 etoposide daily (i.v. day 1 and orally days 2-5), but the first two patients died of septic complications. With reduction of the etoposide dose to 50 mg/m2 daily x 5, the regimen was well tolerated. At this etoposide dose, neutropenia, mucositis, and gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in one patient at each of the two gemcitabine dose levels. In addition, one patient receiving gemcitabine at the 1000 mg/m2 level experienced a possible allergic reaction. The overall response rate was 54%. Patients on gemcitabine at the 800 mg/m2 level who had not received prior chemotherapy had the highest response rate, at 75%. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II doses for this regimen are cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, etoposide 50 mg/m2 i.v. day 1 and orally days 2-5, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8. Future trials should further examine the optimal relative doses and schedule of gemcitabine and etoposide.     

A phase I clinical trial of low-dose interferon-α-2A, thalidomide plus gemcitabine and capecitabine for patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Background We have conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine in combination with interferon, thalidomide and capecitabine. Methods Patients received oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² per day, divided in 2 daily doses, 2 weeks on, 1 week off; subcutaneous interferon-α 1 mIU twice a day without an interruption; daily oral thalidomide 200 mg/day for the first 7 days, then escalated to 400 mg/day without an interruption. Gemcitabine was given by intravenous administration over 30 min on day 1, week 1 and day 8, week 2. Initial dose level of gemcitabine was 400 mg/m². The dose of gemcitabine was the phase I variable. One cycle was 3 weeks. Results and discussion We treated 12 patients, 6 patients were entered at a dose level of 0 (gemcitabine 400 mg/m²) and 6 patients entered at a dose level-1 (gemcitabine 200 mg/m²). Eight of 12 patients completed at least 12 weeks of therapy. Three partial responses and two stable disease were observed. The remaining patients had progressive disease. Non-hematologic toxicity was either grade 1 or 2. Hematologic toxicity at dose level 0 consisted of 3 patients with grade 3/4 neutropenia, and 1 patient with grade 3 thrombocytopenia. At dose level-1 grade 1/2 neutropenia was observed. Conclusions The completion of our phase I experience determined our maximum tolerated dose to be dose level-1. The phase II trial is currently being proposed for patients with rapidly growing clear cell, other histologies that may contain sarcomatoid elements or collecting duct tumor.     

Phase II clinical trial of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and ifosfamide as treatment for advanced locoregional head and neck carcinoma

The association of ifosfamide with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for the management of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was assessed in this trial. Ifosfamide was given initially to 12 patients in combination with standard fixed doses of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, at 1,000 mg/m2 daily on days 2, 3, and 4. Two patients died of neutropenia and severe infection, and the authors recruited seven more patients who were treated with a lower dose of ifosfamide, 800 mg/m2 daily on days 2, 3, and 4. One of the seven patients died of neutropenia and severe infection. Three complete remission were observed in 18 patients evaluable for efficacy. The study was closed early because of the severe toxicity profile demonstrated by this scheme and because of no clear advantage in efficacy versus cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil combinations.     

High dose oral tamoxifen and subcutaneous interferon alpha-2a for recurrent glioma

Chemotherapeutic regimens in present use for recurrent glioma have substantial toxicity. Activity against recurrent gliomas has been reported for both tamoxifen and interferon alpha, agents that have more acceptable toxicity profiles and that can be administered in an outpatient setting. We tested the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of high-dose tamoxifen and interferon alpha in adults with recurrent glioma in a phase II trial. Eligible patients had radiographically measurable recurrent gliomas of any grade after initial radiation therapy. Interferon-alpha (6 × 10⁶ U subcutaneously three times per week) and tamoxifen (240 mg/m²/day orally) were administered continuously. Treatment response was assessed at 6 week intervals using clinical and radiographic criteria. Eighteen patients (11 males and 7 females) were enrolled. Median age was 41 years (range 23–61 years). All patients had gliomas that progressed after radiation therapy and nitrosourea chemotherapy. The histologic diagnosis of the original tumor was glioblastoma multiforme in 8 patients, anaplastic astrocytoma in 5 patients, astrocytoma in 4 patients and mixed malignant glioma in 1 patient. Reversible moderate to severe neurological toxicity manifested by dizziness and unsteady gait was seen at tamoxifen doses of 240 mg/m²/day. Although the initial tamoxifen dose was reduced to 120 mg/m²/day, moderate neurotoxicity was noted at this dose as well and the trial was closed early. The combination of oral tamoxifen (120 to 240 mg/m²/day) and subcutaneous interferon-alpha (6 × 10⁶ U three times per week) was associated with significant neurotoxicity in this group of recurrent glioma patients, resulting in early study closure. Of 16 evaluable patients, 12 had progressive disease after one cycle of treatment, 3 had stable disease, and there was one minor response. Gradual dose escalation may be required if similar patients are to be treated with high dose tamoxifen in conjunction with interferon.     

Phase I/II study of daily carboplatin, 5-fluorouracil and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

A study was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities and the response rate of carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil administered daily with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. In a phase I/II clinical trial, patients with histologically documented, unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled. Carboplatin (20-40 mg m(-2) 2-h infusion, daily) and 5-fluorouracil (200 mg m(-2) 24-h continuous infusion, daily) were administered concurrently with radiotherapy on days 1-33. Radiotherapy, with a total dose of 60 Gy, was delivered in 30 fractions on days 1-40. In the phase I portion, the daily dose of carboplatin was escalated from 20 to 40 mg m(-2). Once the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of carboplatin was determined, the study entered the phase II portion. In the phase I portion, the daily MTD and RD of carboplatin were 40 and 35 mg m(-2), respectively. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. In the following phase II study, 30 patients were entered and the objective response rate was 76.7% (95% CI, 62-92%) and the local control rate was 85.7%. The median survival time was 19.8 months, with a survival rate of 70% at 1 year, 36.7% at 2 years. The major toxicities of treatment were neutropenia (>or=grade 3, 87.9%) and thrombocytopenia (>or=grade 3, 23.3%). This combined therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer is promising and shows acceptable toxicity.