Activities of oseltamivir and ribavirin used alone and in combination against infections in mice with recent isolates of influenza A (H1N1) and B viruses

Mouse models have been widely used for evaluating potential influenza virus inhibitors. However, the viral strains traditionally used in these models are fairly old and do not represent currently circulating viruses in nature. We developed two new lethal infection models in mice using mouse-adapted influenza A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1) and influenza B/Sichuan/379/99 viruses. Both virus infections were used to study oral treatment with oseltamivir and ribavirin, both alone and in combination. Oral treatments were given twice daily for 5 days starting 4 h before infection in initial studies. Against influenza A, oseltamivir was active at 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg/day, protected 80-100% of mice from death and reduced lung consolidation - ribavirin was similarly effective at 20, 40, and 80 mg/kg/day. When treatments were initiated after virus challenge, delaying treatment with oseltamivir even 1 day caused it to be ineffective. Ribavirin prevented mortality by 50-80% when treatments were delayed 1-4 days after infection. The combination of the two drugs (oseltamivir at 20 mg/kg/day and ribavirin at 40 mg/kg/day) was no better than ribavirin alone. In contrast to what we observed with influenza A virus infections, oseltamivir and ribavirin showed similar dose-related antiviral activities against influenza B virus infections. The compounds both significantly increased survival when treatments started up to 4 days after infection, but ribavirin was more active than oseltamivir (50-80% survival compared to 30-40% survival, respectively, when starting treatments on days 2-4 after infection). By varying the doses of each drug that were used in combination (oseltamivir at 1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg/day; ribavirin at 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg/day) certain dosage combinations were superior to either compound used alone as assessed by decreased mortality, lung virus titre, lung score and lung weight parameters. These activities differed from published results with older, more established virus strains as oseltamivir was less effective and ribavirin was more active than previously reported.     

In vivo influenza virus-inhibitory effects of the cyclopentane neuraminidase inhibitor RJW-270201

The cyclopentane influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitor RWJ-270201 was evaluated against influenza A/NWS/33 (H1N1), A/Shangdong/09/93 (H3N2), A/Victoria/3/75 (H3N2), and B/Hong Kong/05/72 virus infections in mice. Treatment was by oral gavage twice daily for 5 days beginning 4 h pre-virus exposure. The influenza virus inhibitor oseltamivir was run in parallel, and ribavirin was included in studies with the A/Shangdong and B/Hong Kong viruses. RWJ-270201 was inhibitory to all infections using doses as low as 1 mg/kg/day. Oseltamivir was generally up to 10-fold less effective than RWJ-270201. Ribavirin was also inhibitory but was less tolerated by the mice at the 75-mg/kg/day dose used. Disease-inhibitory effects included prevention of death, lessening of decline of arterial oxygen saturation, inhibition of lung consolidation, and reduction in lung virus titers. RWJ-270201 and oseltamivir, at doses of 10 and 1 mg/kg/day each, were compared with regard to their effects on daily lung parameters in influenza A/Shangdong/09/93 virus-infected mice. Maximum virus titer inhibition was seen on day 1, with RWJ-270201 exhibiting the greater inhibitory effect, a titer reduction of >10(4) cell culture 50% infective doses (CCID(50))/g. By day 8, the lung virus titers in mice treated with RWJ-270201 had declined to 10(1.2) CCID(50)/g, whereas titers from oseltamivir-treated animals were >10(3) CCID(50)/g. Mean lung consolidation was also higher in the oseltamivir-treated animals on day 8. Both neuraminidase inhibitors were well tolerated by the mice. RWJ-270201 was nontoxic at doses as high as 1,000 mg/kg/day. These data indicate potential for the oral use of RWJ-270201 in the treatment of influenza virus infections in humans.     

Efficacy of orally administered T-705 on lethal avian influenza A (H5N1) virus infections in mice

T-705 (6-fluoro-3-hydroxy-2-pyrazinecarboxamide) was inhibitory to four strains of avian H5N1 influenza virus in MDCK cells, with the 90% effective concentrations ranging from 1.3 to 7.7 microM, as determined by a virus yield reduction assay. The efficacy was less than that exerted by oseltamivir carboxylate or zanamivir but was greater than that exerted by ribavirin. Experiments with mice lethally infected with influenza A/Duck/MN/1525/81 (H5N1) virus showed that T-705 administered per os once, twice, or four times daily for 5 days beginning 1 h after virus exposure was highly inhibitory to the infection. Dosages from 30 to 300 mg/kg of body weight/day were well tolerated; each prevented death, lessened the decline of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO(2)), and inhibited lung consolidation and lung virus titers. Dosages from 30 to 300 mg/kg/day administered once or twice daily also significantly prevented the death of the mice. Oseltamivir (20 mg/kg/day), administered per os twice daily for 5 days, was tested in parallel in two experiments; it was only weakly effective against the infection. The four-times-daily T-705 treatments at 300 mg/kg/day could be delayed until 96 h after virus exposure and still significantly inhibit the infection. Single T-705 treatments administered up to 60 h after virus exposure also prevented death and the decline of SaO(2). Characterization of the pathogenesis of the duck influenza H5N1 virus used in these studies was undertaken; although the virus was highly pathogenic to mice, it was less neurotropic than has been described for clinical isolates of the H5N1 virus. These data indicate that T-705 may be useful for the treatment of avian influenza virus infections.     

Utilization of alpha-1-acid glycoprotein levels in the serum as a parameter for in vivo assay of influenza virus inhibitors

Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP), an acute phase protein in serum assayed by single radial immunodiffusion using a commercially available kit, was found to significantly increase in mice infected with influenza A and B viruses. Experiments were run to determine the rate of increase of serum AGP and its relation to other influenza disease parameters, including lung consolidation, development of lung virus titres, decline in arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), histopathological changes in the lung, and death of the animal. Maximal AGP levels occurred by day 3 in the animals, at about the same time lung virus titres reached their peak and inflammatory effects were evident in the lung. Serum levels of AGP were then compared with other disease parameters in the evaluation of the anti-influenza A and B virus efficacy of oseltamivir and ribavirin in mice. Treatment was by oral gavage twice daily for 5 days, beginning 4 h before virus exposure using doses of 100, 10, and 1 mg/kg per day of oseltamivir and 75 mg/kg per day of ribavirin. Against the influenza A infection, significant inhibition of death, SaO2 decline, and lung consolidation was seen at all doses of each compound; day-6 AGP levels were reduced in a dose-responsive manner. Lung virus titres were lessened at this time, but to a significant degree only at the high dose of oseltamivir and by ribavirin. The influenza B virus infection, which appeared more severe than the influenza A infection, was also significantly inhibited by both compounds, but to a lesser extent. The serum AGP levels were again lessened by therapy with both compounds. The influence of challenge dose of influenza A virus on AGP level and on the antiviral activity of 20 mg/kg per day of oseltamivir, administered by oral gavage, was determined in mice. The AGP level was in proportion to the viral challenge dose; oseltamivir significantly inhibited AGP levels and all other disease parameters regardless of size of viral inoculum. These data indicate murine AGP levels to be markedly stimulated by infection with influenza A and B viruses, and the level of the protein to be an additional measure of antiviral efficacy.     

Efficacy of 1-beta-D-ribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide against influenza virus infections in mice.

1-beta-d-Ribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide (ribavirin) was effective against strains of influenza virus types A and F, whereas amantadine hydrochloride was effective only against strains of influenza virus type A. Dose-related protective effects against lethal influenza infections in mice were obtained with single oral doses of 25 to 400 mg of ribavirin per kg administered at the time of virus inoculation or up to 24 h thereafter. Therapeutic indexes (maximum tolerated dose/median effective dose) against various strains of influenza virus ranged from 5 to 35. With multiple-dose treatment initiated immediately after virus inoculation, oral doses as low as 12 to 25 mg/kg twice daily also afforded significant protection. Treatment with ribavirin inhibited the growth of influenza virus in the lungs of mice and delayed by about 24 h the attainment of maximal viral titers, which in nontreated mice were reached within 24 to 48 h. Inhibition of viral growth was correlated with a suppression of lung consolidation. Ribavirin appears to exert its protective effects against influenza infections by inhibiting virus growth, thereby preventing virus titers from reaching levels that result in massive lung tissue destruction and death of the mice.     

Amantadine-oseltamivir combination therapy for H5N1 influenza virus infection in mice

BACKGROUND: The clinical management of H5N1 influenza virus infection in humans remains unclear. Combination chemotherapy with drugs that target different viral proteins might be more effective than monotherapy. METHODS: BALB/c mice were treated by oral gavage for 5 days with amantadine (1.5, 15 or 30 mg/kg/day) and oseltamivir (1 or 10 mg/kg/day) separately or in combination. Mice were challenged 24 h after initiation of treatment with 10 mouse 50% lethal doses of either amantadine-sensitive (having S31 in the M2 protein) or amantadine-resistant (having N31 in the M2 protein) recombinant A/Vietnam/1203/04 (H5N1) virus. RESULTS: Combination treatment with amantadine (15 or 30 mg/kg/day) and oseltamivir (10 mg/kg/day) provided greater protection (60% and 90%, respectively) against lethal infection with amantadine-sensitive H5N1 virus than did monotherapy. Moreover, spread of the virus to the brain was prevented by both combination regimens. The efficacy of the drug combinations against amantadine-resistant H5N1 virus was comparable to that of oseltamivir alone. Oseltamivir produced a dose-dependent effect against both recombinant H5N1 viruses (P < 0.05) but did not provide complete protection against lethal infection. Importantly, no mutations in the HA, NA and M2 proteins were detected when the two drugs were used in combination. CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy provided a survival advantage over single-agent treatment of mice inoculated with neurotropic H5N1 influenza virus. This strategy might be an option for the control of pandemic influenza viruses that are sensitive to amantadine. Combinations that include other drugs should be explored.     

Oseltamivir-ribavirin combination therapy for highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus infection in mice

We studied the effects of a neuraminidase inhibitor (oseltamivir) and an inhibitor of influenza virus polymerases (ribavirin) against two highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses. In vitro, A/Vietnam/1203/04 virus (clade 1) was highly susceptible to oseltamivir carboxylate (50% inhibitory concentration [IC₅₀] = 0.3 nM), whereas A/Turkey/15/06 virus (clade 2.2) had reduced susceptibility (IC₅₀ = 5.5 nM). In vivo, BALB/c mice were treated with oseltamivir (1, 10, 50, or 100 mg/kg of body weight/day), ribavirin (37.5, 55, or 75 mg/kg/day), or the combination of both drugs for 8 days, starting 4 h before virus inoculation. Monotherapy produced a dose-dependent antiviral effect against the two H5N1 viruses in vivo. Three-dimensional analysis of the drug-drug interactions revealed that oseltamivir and ribavirin interacted principally in an additive manner, with several exceptions of marginal synergy or marginal antagonism at some concentrations. The combination of ribavirin at 37.5 mg/kg/day and oseltamivir at 1 mg/kg/day and the combination of ribavirin at 37.5 mg/kg/day and oseltamivir at 10 mg/kg/day were synergistic against A/Vietnam/1203/04 and A/Turkey/15/06 viruses, respectively. These optimal oseltamivir-ribavirin combinations significantly inhibited virus replication in mouse organs, prevented the spread of H5N1 viruses beyond the respiratory tract, and abrogated the cytokine response (P < 0.01). Importantly, we observed clear differences between the efficacies of the drug combinations against two H5N1 viruses: higher doses were required for the protection of mice against A/Turkey/15/06 virus than for the protection of mice against A/Vietnam/1203/04 virus. Our preliminary results suggest that oseltamivir-ribavirin combinations can have a greater or lesser antiviral effect than monotherapy, depending on the H5N1 virus and the concentrations used.     

Treatment of cowpox virus respiratory infections in mice with ribavirin as a single agent or followed sequentially by cidofovir

To better understand the potential of ribavirin in the treatment of orthopoxvirus infections (such as those acquired through bioterrorist activities), the efficacy of the drug was studied in a cowpox respiratory infection model in mice under varying disease severity. Mice did not survive a high intranasal cowpox virus challenge [3 x 10(6) plaque forming units (pfu)/animal] treated with subcutaneous ribavirin (100 mg/kg/day for 5 days), but lived 3.9 days longer than placebos. In contrast, 100% of animals receiving the same dose of drug survived a 3 x 10(5) pfu challenge compared with 0% survival of those that received placebo. Survival rates of 50 and 30% occurred with ribavirin doses of 50 and 25 mg/kg/day, respectively. At the 100 mg/kg/day dose, ribavirin reduced lung virus titres 40-fold on day 6 of the infection relative to titres in the placebo group. Weight loss resulting from illness and mean lung weights of mice treated with ribavirin were also significantly reduced. Mice were infected intranasally with the high 3 x 10(6) pfu virus challenge dose and treated with 100 mg/kg/day ribavirin for 5 days, followed by single injections of 75 mg/kg cidofovir on day 6, 7, 8 or 9. Cidofovir alone (without ribavirin) administered on day 6 had no beneficial effect on disease outcome. Ribavirin alone increased the mean time to death by 3.7 days. Ribavirin treatment for 5 days followed by cidofovir treatment on days 6 and 7 significantly increased the mean time to death beyond that achieved with ribavirin alone by 8.2 and 4.4 days, respectively, with 30 and 40% of mice surviving the infection. These results suggest that many individuals infected with an orthopoxvirus by aerosol route would benefit by a course of ribavirin therapy. Later, the fewer number of very sick individuals could be treated with intravenous cidofovir.     

Effects of the Combination of Favipiravir (T-705) and Oseltamivir on Influenza A Virus Infections in Mice

Favipiravir (T-705 [6-fluoro-3-hydroxy-2-pyrazinecarboxamide]) and oseltamivir were combined to treat influenza virus A/NWS/33 (H1N1), A/Victoria/3/75 (H3N2), and A/Duck/MN/1525/81 (H5N1) infections. T-705 alone inhibited viruses in cell culture at 1.4 to 4.3 μM. Oseltamivir inhibited these three viruses in cells at 3.7, 0.02, and 0.16 μM and in neuraminidase assays at 0.94, 0.46, and 2.31 nM, respectively. Oral treatments were given twice daily to mice for 5 to 7 days starting, generally, 24 h after infection. Survival resulting from 5 days of oseltamivir treatment (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg/day) was significantly better in combination with 20 mg/kg of body weight/day of T-705 against the H1N1 infection. Treatment of the H3N2 infection required 50 mg/kg/day of oseltamivir for 7 days to achieve 60% protection; 25 mg/kg/day was ineffective. T-705 was ≥70% protective at 50 to 100 mg/kg/day but inactive at 25 mg/kg/day. The combination of inhibitors (25 mg/kg/day each) increased survival to 90%. The H5N1 infection was not benefited by treatment with oseltamivir (≤100 mg/kg/day for 7 days). T-705 was 30 to 70% protective at 25 to 100 mg/kg/day. Survival improved slightly with combination treatments. Increased activity was seen against H5N1 infection by starting treatments 2 h before infection. Oseltamivir was ineffective at ≤40 mg/kg/day. T-705 was 100% protective at 40 and 80 mg/kg/day and inactive at 20 mg/kg/day. Combining ineffective doses (20 mg/kg/day of T-705 and 10 to 40 mg/kg/day of oseltamivir) afforded 60 to 80% protection and improved body weights during infection. Thus, synergistic responses were achieved with low doses of T-705 combined with oseltamivir. These compounds may be viable candidates for combination treatment of human influenza infections.The emergence of swine influenza H1N1 virus infections in 2009 (2) highlights the need for effective antiviral therapy in a largely immune-naïve population. Treatment options for influenza are becoming more limited because viruses, including the 2009 swine H1N1 virus, are resistant to the antiviral drugs amantadine and rimantadine (3, 4, 11, 13, 20). Oseltamivir-resistant viruses are also becoming more common in the environment, particularly within the last 2 years (1, 5, 19). Thus, more potent and effective treatments are needed to combat these growing threats.More potent antiviral therapy can be achieved by using drugs in combination, as demonstrated in mouse models (10, 14-17, 24, 26, 27). Such treatment can slow down the emergence of drug-resistant viruses (12). The reported animal studies have primarily focused on the known-active antiviral agents amantadine, rimantadine, oseltamivir, peramivir, zanamivir, and ribavirin. The kinds of studies that can be performed have been limited based upon the number of active antiviral compounds that are available.In 2002, Furuta et al. reported a novel pyrazine molecule, T-705 (6-fluoro-3-hydroxy-2-pyrazinecarboxamide, now named favipiravir), as an inhibitor of influenza virus infections in cell culture and in mice (8). T-705 inhibits both influenza A and B viruses (8, 23, 29). The compound converts to nucleoside mono- (T-705 RMP [ribosylated, monophosphorylated]), di-, and triphosphate (T-705 RTP [ribosylated, triphosphorylated]) forms in cells (9). The mode of action of T-705 RTP is similar to that of ribavirin triphosphate as an inhibitor of influenza virus RNA polymerase (6, 9). Unlike ribavirin monophosphate, T-705 RMP is only weakly inhibitory to cellular inosine monophosphate (IMP) dehydrogenase (9, 28), and thus, it is less cytotoxic. These properties make T-705 a viable candidate for the treatment of influenza virus infections in humans. The compound is currently undergoing phase II clinical trials.The use of T-705 in combination with other antiviral substances has not been reported. The purpose of the present work was to evaluate whether the combination of T-705 with the widely used antiviral drug oseltamivir is more beneficial than either substance used alone against influenza virus infections in mice. We chose three mouse-adapted influenza viruses for these comparisons, A/NWS/33 (H1N1), A/Victoria/3/75 (H3N2), and A/Duck/MN/1525/81 (H5N1). The A/NWS and A/Victoria viruses are of seasonal origin and are confined to the respiratory tract following infection. The A/Duck virus is a low-pathogenicity avian virus from the United States that also does not spread beyond the respiratory tract of mice. The experimental influenza A/Duck mouse infection does not fully reflect the type of pathogenesis of the highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses from the Old World. This is because the A/Duck virus lacks the multibasic amino acid R-X-R/K-R motif in the hemagglutinin protein, whereas the highly pathogenic avian H5N1 viruses contain it (7). This motif allows for the highly pathogenic viruses to be proteolytically activated by ubiquitous subtilisin-like cellular proteases, allowing the virus to spread in vivo beyond the respiratory tract and to cause multiorgan failure. Nevertheless, the A/Duck virus induces rapid, severe lung infections that are difficult to treat with conventional antiviral therapy. Using these three models, H1N1, H3N2, and H5N1, in mice, we were able to demonstrate the benefits of using oseltamivir and T-705 in combination to treat influenza virus infections.     

Oral oseltamivir in human experimental influenza B infection

Oseltamivir is the prodrug of Ro64-0802 (GS4071), a potent and selective inhibitor of influenza A and B virus neuraminidases. Three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluated oral oseltamivir for early treatment (75 or 150 mg twice daily for 5 days) or prevention (75 mg once or twice daily for 7 days) of experimental influenza B virus infection in healthy susceptible adults. Treatment study A (n=60) demonstrated similar trends to treatment study B (n=117), in which 75 mg doses of oseltamivir introduced 24 h after inoculation reduced median area under curve (AUC) virus titre (oseltamivir, 22.7; placebo, 131.1 log10 TCID50 x h/ml; P=0.002) and duration of viral shedding (oseltamivir, 23.9 h; placebo, 95.8 h; P=0.0005). In prevention study C (n=58), oseltamivir did not reduce infection rates (85 versus 84%) but significantly reduced median AUC virus titre (10.0 versus 66.9 log10 TCID50 x h/ml; P=0.03) and duration of viral shedding (36 versus 84 h; P=0.03) compared with placebo. Oseltamivir was well tolerated. No emergence of drug-resistant variants was detected by testing last-day isolates (n=112) in neuraminidase inhibition assays. These results indicate that oseltamivir has significant antiviral activity in experimental human influenza B virus infection when used for prophylaxis or early treatment.     

Effect of oral gavage treatment with ZnAL42 and other metallo-ion formulations on influenza A H5N1 and H1N1 virus infections in mice

Avian influenza H5N1 infections can cause severe, lethal human infections. Whether influenza A virus treatments effectively ameliorate avian influenza H5N1 human infections is uncertain. The research objective was to evaluate the efficacy of novel zinc and other metallo-ion formulations in two influenza A mouse models. Mice infected with influenza A/Duck/MN/1525/81 (H5N1) virus were treated orally 48 h before virus exposure and then twice daily for 13 days with ZnAL42. The optimal dosing regimen for ZnAL42 was achieved at 17.28 mg/kg 48 h prior to virus exposure, twice daily for 7 days. The survival rate was 80% compared with 10% in the untreated control group and a 100% survival rate with ribavirin (75 mg/kg/day, twice a day for 5 days, beginning 4 h before virus exposure). ZnAL42 treatment significantly lessened the decline in arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2; P < 0.001). This regimen was also well tolerated by the mice. Manganese and selenium formulations were not inhibitory to virus replication when given therapeutically. Mice were also infected with influenza A/NWS/33 (H1N1) virus and were treated 48 h before virus exposure with three dosages of ZnAL42 (8.64, 1.46 or 0.24 mg/kg/day). Treatment was by oral gavage twice daily for 13 days. The highest dose of ZnAL42 was significantly inhibitory to the virus infection as seen by prevention of deaths and lessening of decline in SaO2. The data suggest that the prophylactic use of ZnAL42 is effective against avian influenza H5N1 or H1N1 virus infection in mice and should be further explored as an option for treating human influenza virus infections.     

In vitro and in vivo activities of T-705 and oseltamivir against influenza virus

T-705 (6-fluoro-3-hydroxy-2-pyrazinecarboxamide) has a potent and selective inhibitory activity against influenza virus. We studied the effects of an infectious dose on the anti-influenza virus activities of T-705 and oseltamivir, a commercially available neuraminidase inhibitor, both in vitro and in vivo. Plaque formation of influenza A/PR/8/34 virus was completely inhibited by 10 microg/ml of T-705 after 72 h incubation, whereas visible plaque formation was detected in the plate treated with GS 4071, the active form of oseltamivir (10 microg/ml). The antiviral activity of T-705 was not influenced by an increase in multiplicity of infection (MOI) from 0.0001 to 1, but that of GS 4071 was influenced in a yield reduction assay. No increase in viral yield was seen in either culture supernatant or cells after removal of T-705 (10 microg/ml) but, in contrast, productive infection recurred in culture supernatant and in cells after removal of GS 4071. In mice infected with a high challenge dose of influenza A/PR/8/34 virus, orally administered T-705 (200 and 400 mg/kg/day) completely prevented the death of mice and the survival rates of mice were significantly higher than those in mice treated with oseltamivir (P<0.01). When the treatment was delayed at 1, 13 and 25 h post infection, oral administration of 200 mg/kg of T-705 significantly prevented the death of mice (P<0.01), and the survival rates of mice treated with T-705 were comparable to those of mice treated with oseltamivir. These results suggest that T-705 has the potential to be a potent inhibitor of human influenza virus infections.     

Comparison of the anti-influenza virus activity of RWJ-270201 with those of oseltamivir and zanamivir

We have recently reported an influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitor, RWJ-270201 (BCX-1812), a novel cyclopentane derivative discovered through structure-based drug design. In this paper, we compare the potency of three compounds, RWJ-270201, oseltamivir, and zanamivir, against neuraminidase enzymes from various subtypes of influenza. RWJ-270201 effectively inhibited all tested influenza A and influenza B neuraminidases in vitro, with 50% inhibitory concentrations of 0.09 to 1.4 nM for influenza A neuraminidases and 0.6 to 11 nM for influenza B neuraminidases. These values were comparable to or lower than those for oseltamivir carboxylate (GS4071) and zanamivir (GG167). RWJ-270201 demonstrated excellent selectivity (>10,000-fold) for influenza virus neuraminidase over mammalian, bacterial, or other viral neuraminidases. Oral administration of a dosage of 1 mg/kg of body weight/day of RWJ-270201 for 5 days (beginning 4 h preinfection) showed efficacy in the murine model of influenza virus infection as determined by lethality and weight loss protection. RWJ-270201 administered intranasally at 0.01 mg/kg/day in the murine influenza model demonstrated complete protection against lethality, whereas oseltamivir carboxylate and zanamivir at the same dose demonstrated only partial protection. In the delayed-treatment murine influenza model, oral administration of a 10-mg/kg/day dose of RWJ-270201 or oseltamivir (GS4104, a prodrug of GS4071) at 24 h postinfection showed significant protection against lethality (P < 0.001 versus control). However, when the treatment was delayed for 48 h, no significant protection was observed in either drug group. No drug-related toxicity was observed in mice receiving 100 mg/kg/day of RWJ-270201 for 5 days. These efficacy and safety profiles justify further consideration of RWJ-270201 for the treatment and prevention of human influenza.     

Inhibition of influenza virus replication in mice by GG167 (4-guanidino-2,4-dideoxy-2,3-dehydro-N-acetylneuraminic acid) is consistent with extracellular activity of viral neuraminidase (sialidase).

We demonstrate the potent antiviral activity of a novel viral neuraminidase (sialidase) inhibitor, 4-guanidino-2,4-dideoxy-2,3-dehydro-N-acetylneuraminic acid (GG167), administered by the intranasal route in comparison with those of amantadine and ribavirin in experimental respiratory tract infections induced with influenza A and B viruses. In an extended study in which mice were infected (day 0) with influenza A/Singapore/1/57 virus, with treatments given prophylactically plus twice daily over days 0 to 3 and with mice observed to day 10, we show that intranasally administered GG167 at 0.4 and 0.01 mg/kg of body weight per dose reduced mortality, lung consolidation, and virus titers in the lung, with no virus growing back following the cessation of treatment. In other studies with influenza B/Victoria/102/85 virus in which infected mice were culled after the cessation of treatment, the calculated intranasal dose required to reduce virus titers in the lungs of treated animals to 10% of that seen in untreated controls (EDAUC10 [where AUC is area under the virus titer days curve]) was 0.085 mg/kg per dose. GG167 was inactive against influenza viruses A and B when given by the intraperitoneal or oral route (EDAUC10, > 100 mg/kg per dose). GG167 was metabolically stable, with an elimination half-life of 10 min following intravenous administration. While readily bioavailable by systemic routes, it was poorly bioavailable by the oral route. Its potent efficacy by the intranasal route but lack of efficacy by other routes, relative to those of amantadine and ribavirin, was explicable in terms of its in vitro activity, bioavailability, and pharmacokinetic properties and with the extracellular activity of viral sialidase.     

In vitro and in vivo Phlebovirus inhibition by ribavirin.

Ribavirin (1-beta-D-ribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide) was markedly inhibitory in vitro to Adames and Balliet strains of Punta Toro virus (PTV), a Phlebovirus related to Rift Valley fever and sandfly fever viruses. By using inhibition of viral cytopathic effect in LLC-MK2 cells with both virus strains, the 50% effective dose was 4 to 10 micrograms/ml and the virus rating was 1.3. The Adames strain of PTV infection in mice was established for evaluation of the in vivo antiviral efficacy of ribavirin. The drug was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) twice daily for 5 to 7 days beginning 4 h pre-virus inoculation, 24 h post-virus inoculation, or 36 h post-virus inoculation, with increased survivors, reduced hepatic icterus, reduction of serum glutamic oxalic acid transaminase and serum glutamic pyruvic acid transaminase, and inhibition of infectious virus from sera and livers of infected mice. The minimum effective dose was 4.7 mg/kg per day, with a maximum tolerated dose of 75 mg/kg per day. When the same treatment schedule beginning 4 h pre-virus inoculation, 4 h post-virus inoculation, or 24 h post-virus inoculation was used, orally administered ribavirin was effective at doses as low as 6.3 mg/kg per day. Single s.c. ribavirin treatments at doses of 175 to 700 mg/kg administered from 4 to 48 h post-virus inoculation were also effective. No effect was seen when ribavirin was administered s.c. to mice infected intracerebrally with the PTV strain Balliet, even though treatment was begun 36 h before virus exposure.     

蚀斑减数试验的建立及在体外抗流感病毒药物敏感性试验中的应用

目的 建立PRA以评估奥司他韦(达菲)、金刚烷胺、利巴韦林和板蓝根4种药物的体外抗流感病毒作用.方法 建立PRA,选取临床分离的流感病毒株8株,其中甲型流感病毒3株,乙型流感病毒5株.病毒培养并接种,利用PRA测定奥司他韦、金刚烷胺、利巴韦林和板蓝根4种药物体外对流感病毒的IC_(50)值.结果 8株甲、乙型流感病毒临床分离株的PRA测定结果显示,奥司他韦对甲型流感病毒IC_(50)值为0.064-0.128 mg/L,金刚烷胺为0.5 mg/L,利巴韦林对甲型流感病毒不敏感(IC_(50)>8 mg/L),板蓝根无抗病毒作用;奥司他韦、金刚烷胺、利巴韦林和板蓝根对乙型流感病毒均未发现体外抗病毒作用.结论 奥司他韦和金刚烷胺对甲型流感病毒敏感,利巴韦林不敏感,板蓝根无抗病毒作用,该4种药物未发现体外抗乙型流感病毒作用.     

Clinical and immunological evaluation of oral ribavirin administration in recurrent herpes simplex infections

A total of 38 out-patients with recurrent oral or genital Herpes simplex virus infections received either oral ribavirin (800-1600 mg/day for 7 days) or placebo following a randomized and balanced protocol. Clinical and laboratory parameters, including haematological, metabolic and immunological tests, were checked in order to estimate tolerance to and efficacy of ribavirin on recurrent Herpes simplex virus infection and on the number of recurrences during the 12 months following treatment. Ribavirin showed definite superiority in the treatment of recurrent Herpes simplex virus 1, when compared to placebo, its efficacy being enhanced if treatment is started as soon as possible after infection has started. No significant modification of the parameters used to assess tolerance was noted; moreover there was no modification of the immunological parameters evaluated.     

Efficacy of single intravenous injection of peramivir against influenza B virus infection in ferrets and cynomolgus macaques

We evaluated the efficacy of a single intravenous dose peramivir for treatment of influenza B virus infection in ferrets and cynomolgus macaques in the present study. A single dose of peramivir (60 mg/kg of body weight) given to ferrets on 1 day postinfection with influenza B virus significantly reduced median area under the curve (AUC) virus titers (peramivir, 8.3 log(10) 50% tissue culture infective doses [TCID(50)s] · day/ml; control, 10.7 log(10) TCID(50)s · day/ml; P < 0.0001). Furthermore, nasal virus titers on day 2 postinfection in ferrets receiving a single injection of peramivir (30 mg/kg) and AUCs of the body temperature increase in ferrets receiving a single injection of peramivir (30 and 60 mg/kg) were lower than those in ferrets administered oral oseltamivir phosphate (30 and 60 mg/kg/day twice daily for 3 days). In macaques infected with influenza B virus, viral titers in the nasal swab fluid on days 2 and 3 postinfection and body temperature after a single injection of peramivir (30 mg/kg) were lower than those after oral administration of oseltamivir phosphate (30 mg/kg/day for 5 days). The two animal models used in the present study demonstrated that inhibition of viral replication at the early time point after infection was critical in reduction of AUCs of virus titers and interleukin-6 production, resulting in amelioration of symptoms. Our results shown in animal models suggest that the early treatment with a single intravenous injection of peramivir is clinically recommended to reduce symptoms effectively in influenza B virus infection.     

Amantadine and ribavirin aerosol treatment of influenza A and B infection in mice.

Ribavirin, amantadine, and the two drugs in combination given in small-particle aerosol were highly effective in the treatment of influenza A infection in mice. Treatment was started 72, 96, and 120 h after inoculation and was given continuously for 4 days. With increasing delay in start of treatment, there was a pronounced reduction in effectiveness of ribavirin but not in that of amantadine. The combination treatment reflected the loss of ribavirin activity. Leukocyte infiltration and virus titers in the lungs were inversely related to the effectiveness of treatment. Influenza B infection treated 72 h after inoculation responded only to ribavirin, as indicated by the criteria described for influenza A. Intraperitoneal administration of drug begun 72 h after inoculation in regimens equivalent to aerosol afforded less protection than aerosol treatment.     

Anti-influenza virus activity of propolis in vitro and its efficacy against influenza infection in mice

BACKGROUND: Propolis has been used worldwide as a dietary supplement to maintain and improve human health. We examined whether ethanol extracts of Brazilian propolis exhibit antiviral activity against influenza virus in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: Among 13 ethanol extracts screened in a plaque reduction assay, four showed anti-influenza virus activity. The anti-influenza efficacy of the four extracts was further examined in a murine influenza virus infection model. The mice were infected intranasally with influenza virus, and the four extracts were orally administered at 10 mg/kg three times daily for seven successive days after infection. RESULTS: In this infection model, only one extract, AF-08, was significantly effective at 10 mg/kg in reducing the body weight loss of infected mice. The doses of 2 and 10 mg/kg were also effective in prolonging the survival times of infected mice significantly, but 0.4 mg/kg was not. The anti-influenza efficacy of AF-08 at 10 mg/kg was confirmed in a dose-dependent manner in mice. AF-08 at 10 mg/kg significantly reduced virus yields in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluids of lungs in infected mice as compared with the control. The reduction of virus yields by AF-08 at 10 mg/kg significantly corresponded to those induced by oseltamivir at 1 mg/kg twice daily from day 1 to day 4 after infection. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian propolis AF-08 was indicated to possess anti-influenza virus activity and to ameliorate influenza symptoms in mice. AF-08 may be a possible candidate for an anti-influenza dietary supplement for humans.