Professional continuous glucose monitoring in patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim

To evaluate the effect on glucose control of professional continuous glucose monitoring (p-CGM)-based care as compared with standard care in the management of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Materials and methods

The PubMed database was searched comprehensively to identify prospective or retrospective studies evaluating p-CGM as a diagnostic tool for subsequent implementation of lifestyle and/or medication changes and reporting glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) as an outcome measure.

Results

We found 872 articles, 22 of which were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the use of p-CGM was associated with greater HbA1c reduction from baseline (−0.28%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.36% to −0.21%, I² = 0%, P < 0.00001) than usual care, irrespective of type of diabetes, length of follow-up, frequency of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use and duration of CGM recording. In the few studies describing CGM-derived glucose metrics, p-CGM showed a beneficial effect on change in time in range from baseline (5.59%, 95% CI 0.12 to 11.06, I² = 0%, P = 0.05) and a neutral effect on change in time below the target range from baseline (−0.11%, 95% CI −1.76% to 1.55%, I² = 33%, P = 0.90).

Conclusions

In patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, p-CGM-driven care is superior to usual care in improving glucose control without increasing hypoglycaemia.     

Effect of glycaemic control on cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes with pre-existing cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The role of intensive glucose control in people with type 2 diabetes and pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) is controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine in a subset of people with type 2 diabetes and pre-existing CVD, the CV effect of intensive glucose control versus standard of care. We searched Medline, the Cochrane library, EMBASE and the National Institutes of Health Trial registration database for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effect of intensive glucose control versus standard glucose control in people with type 2 diabetes on incident CVD. Data were extracted using a structured form. When data were not available in the publications, authors were contacted. Eight trials involving 8339 participants were included. Among adults with type 2 diabetes and pre-existing CVD, there was no difference in the risk of CV events in those allocated to intensive glucose control compared with those in the standard care arm (relative risk 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.09). In conclusion, in people with diabetes and pre-existing CVD, intensive glucose control versus standard care had a neutral effect on incident CV events.     

The indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and without COVID-19 infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe effect directly from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection on health and fatality has received considerable attention, particularly among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, evidence on the indirect impact of disrupted healthcare services during the pandemic on people with T2DM is limited. This systematic review aims to assess the indirect impact of the pandemic on the metabolic management of T2DM people without a history of COVID-19 infection.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched for studies that compared diabetes-related health outcomes between pre-pandemic and during-pandemic periods in people with T2DM and without the COVID-19 infection and published from January 1, 2020, to July 13, 2022. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the overall effect on the diabetes indicators, including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), lipid profiles, and weight control, with different effect models according to the heterogeneity.ResultsEleven observational studies were included in the final review. No significant changes in HbA1c levels [weighted mean difference (WMD), 0.06 (95% CI −0.12 to 0.24)] and body weight index (BMI) [0.15 (95% CI −0.24 to 0.53)] between the pre-pandemic and during-pandemic were found in the meta-analysis. Four studies reported lipid indicators; most reported insignificant changes in low-density lipoprotein (LDL, n = 2) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL, n = 3); two studies reported an increase in total cholesterol and triglyceride.ConclusionsThis review did not find significant changes in HbA1c and BMI among people with T2DM after data pooling, but a possible worsening in lipids parameters during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were limited data on long-term outcomes and healthcare utilization, which warrants further research.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42022360433.     

Delayed effect of different exercise modalities on glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aimsDespite the crucial role of exercise in the prevention of comorbidities and complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), people living with the disease are often insufficiently physically active, mainly due to the fear of hypoglycaemia. Research using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices has shown that exercise affects glycaemic control in T1DM for over 24 h. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is, therefore, to investigate the delayed effects of different exercise modalities on glycaemic control in adults with T1DM.Methods and resultsThe literature search of experimental studies was conducted on PubMed, SPORTDiscus and EMBASE from January 2000 to September 2019. Twelve studies using CGM devices were included. Compared to endurance, intermittent exercise increased the time spent in hypoglycaemia (0.62, 0.07 to 1.18; standardised effect size, 95% CI) and reduced the mean interstitial glucose concentration (?0.88, ?1.45 to ?0.33). No differences emerged in the time spent in hyperglycaemia (?0.07, ?0.58 to 0.45) or in the proportion of exercisers experiencing hypoglycaemic events (0.82, 0.45 to 1.49; proportion ratio, 95% CI) between conditions. The systematic review also found a reduced risk of hypoglycaemia if exercise is performed in the morning rather than in the afternoon, and with a 50% rapid-acting insulin reduction. It was not possible to determine the benefits of resistance exercise.ConclusionsFor the first time, we systematically investigated the delayed effect of exercise in adults with T1DM, highlighted undetected effects, shortcomings in the existing literature, and provided suggestions to design future comparable studies.     

COVID-19 associated ketosis and diabetic ketoacidosis: A rapid review

SARS-CoV-2 infection could disrupt the endocrine system directly or indirectly, which could result in endocrine dysfunction and glycaemic dysregulation, triggering transient or persistent diabetes mellitus. The literature on the complex relationship between COVID-19 and endocrine dysfunctions is still evolving and remains incompletely understood. Thus, we conducted a review on all literature to date involving COVID-19 associated ketosis or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). In total, 27 publications were included and analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. Studies included patients with DKA with existing or new onset diabetes. While the number of case and cohort studies was limited, DKA in the setting of COVID-19 seemed to increase risk of death, particularly in patients with new onset diabetes. Future studies with more specific variables and larger sample sizes are needed to draw better conclusions.     

Factors related to the risk of stroke in the population with type 2 diabetes: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:Type 2 diabetes is an independent risk factor for stroke. The main role of the current study is to study the mechanism of stroke induced by diabetes, but there is no systematic summary of daily management and stroke prevention for patients with type 2 diabetes. In order to provide a more detailed stroke prevention program for patients with type 2 diabetes, we included in the study and looked forward to analyzing the risk factors that were more in line with the clinical characteristics of type 2 diabetes.Methods:We will search the following Chinese and English databases: PubMed, Web of science, Cochrane Library, Medline, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure database. All of the above electronic databases will be searched from inception to June 30, 2021. In addition, we will manually search for conference papers, ongoing experiments, and internal reports to supplement the studies retrieved via electronic search. We will use the STATA 16.0 provided by Cochrane Collaboration Network for statistical analysis.Results:The study will prove a collective view on the relationship between related factors and stroke in the type 2 diabetes population.Conclusion:We plan to submit this systematic review to a peer-reviewed journal.INPLASY registration number: INPLASY2021100046     

Obesity and weight change during the COVID-19 pandemic in children and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Many obesity risk factors have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, including physical inactivity, poor diet, stress, and poverty. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as associated lockdowns or restrictions, on weight change in children and adults. We searched five databases from January 2020 to November 2021. We included only longitudinal studies with measures from before and during the pandemic that evaluated the change in weight, body mass index (BMI) (or BMI z-scores for children), waist circumference, or the prevalence of obesity. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to obtain pooled estimates of the mean difference in outcomes. Subgroups were evaluated for age groups and diabetes or obesity at baseline. The risk of bias was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A total of 74 studies were included (3,213,776 total participants): 31 studies of children, 41 studies of adults, and 2 studies of children and adults. In children, the pooled mean difference was 1.65 kg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40, 2.90; 9 studies) for weight and 0.13 (95% CI 0.10, 0.17; 20 studies) for BMI z-scores, and the prevalence of obesity increased by 2% (95% CI 1%, 3%; 12 studies). In adults, the pooled mean difference was 0.93 kg (95% CI 0.54, 1.33; 27 studies) for weight and 0.38 kg/m² (95% CI 0.21, 0.55; 25 studies) for BMI, and the prevalence of obesity increased by 1% (95% CI 0%, 3%; 11 studies). In children and adults, the pooled mean difference for waist circumference was 1.03 cm (95% CI −0.08, 2.15; 4 studies). There was considerable heterogeneity observed for all outcomes in both children and adults, and the certainty of evidence assessed using GRADE was very low for all outcomes. During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, small but potentially clinically significant increases in weight gain, BMI, and increased prevalence of obesity in both children and adults were observed. Increases were greater in children, and targeted prevention interventions may be warranted.