The safety and efficacy of angioseal in therapeutic endovascular interventions.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the closure device Angioseal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All consecutive patients, who underwent a therapeutic radiological intervention using the femoral artery approach from January 2001 to January 2005 in the Service of Vascular Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France, were prospectively included in the study. The efficacy of Angioseal was defined by the ability of the device to cover the puncture site and stop bleeding. The safety was defined by the rate of complications. RESULTS: A total of 79 Angioseal devices were employed on 77 patients. There were 62 (78.5%) males and 17 (21.5%) females. The mean age of the patients was 65.2+/-11.6 years (mean+/-SD). All Angioseal devices were deployed successfully. There were 62 (78.4%) 6F and 17 (21.6%) 8F sheaths employed during the procedures. There were two minor (2.5%) hematomas, one (1.2%) major hematoma and one (1.2%) pseudoaneurysm after the procedure. The mean time of discharge from the hospital was 2.1+/-1.8 (mean+/-SD) days. The patients were followed up for a mean of 9.0+/-9.3 (1-60 months) months. CONCLUSIONS: Angioseal provides a safe and effective way of closing the femoral artery puncture site with acceptable morbidity rates.     

Peripheral angioplasty with same-day discharge in patients with intermittent claudication

BACKGROUND: As the number of endovascular interventions increase and resources become scarce, surgeons need to be aware of cost-effective and efficient practice options. Many surgeons routinely admit their patients for overnight observation after uneventful endovascular interventions. Although this may be appropriate for patients with tissue loss and rest pain, we believe that peripheral angioplasty in patients with claudication can be safely performed as an outpatient procedure with significant cost savings. METHODS: All patients with intermittent claudication undergoing peripheral angioplasty by a single vascular surgeon were enrolled prospectively in a same-day discharge protocol. Involved arteries and use of stent and closure device were recorded. Time to mobilization and time to discharge were determined. Patients were observed in an observation unit by a registered nurse, and were examined by the surgeon at the time of ambulation and before discharge. Patients were admitted to the hospital if complications arose during the predetermined observation period. Periprocedural complications and reasons for admission were noted. Patients were evaluated at 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 to 6 months after the intervention. RESULTS: During 27 months, 112 interventions were performed in 97 patients. The superficial femoral artery was the most frequent site of intervention (47%). Multiple sites had angioplasty in 27 (24%) procedures. Nine (8%) procedures resulted in admission. One patient was admitted for a major puncture site hematoma requiring blood transfusion, two patients for observation of a minor hematoma at the puncture site, one for chest pain, and one for observation of transient bradycardia. The mean time to mobilization was 1.4 +/- 1.3 hours, and the mean time to discharge was 2.8 +/- 1.2 hours. The average postprocedural cost for patients undergoing same-day discharge was $320 per patient, which contrasts with $1800 for routine overnight observation. No deaths or unplanned admissions to the hospital occurred < or =30 days of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Same-day discharge after peripheral angioplasty is safe and cost-effective. Need for admission is evident within 2 hours. Routine admission after peripheral angioplasty for patients with claudication is unnecessary and should no longer be the standard of care.     

模拟器训练在实施股动脉穿刺点ExoSealTM封堵止血系统操作的多中心对照研究

背景与目的：介入手术已成为血管外科的主要治疗手段,对于手术直接相关的股动脉穿刺点封堵处理是手术操作收尾的一个重要环节。鉴于国内外目前尚缺乏关于封堵止血系统模拟器训练应用效果的高级别证据,本研究旨在评估模拟器训练在实施股动脉穿刺点ExoSealTM封堵止血系统操作的临床应用效果以及在血管介入操作基础教学培训中的应用价值。 方法：采用前瞻性对照设计,选择2020年5月—2020年10月7个中心的8名血管介入医师分别用两种不同方式进行封堵操作培训。4名血管介入医师通过阅读ExoSealTM说明书和观看视频进行培训（对照组）,另4名血管介入医师的培训方式为在前者基础上增加专业人员指导下的模拟器使用（研究组）。培训结束后,在主诊医师监管下,每名医师对接受血管介入手术,并在股总动脉使用6 F鞘管的患者,采用ExoSealTM封堵止血系统对穿刺点进行封堵。两组医师各操作50例患者,比较两组的操作时间、出血量、器械成功率、股动脉栓塞发生率、二次干预率、24 h内发生血肿率。 结果：研究组在ExoSealTM封堵止血系统操作中,所需的操作时间和出血量均少于对照组（24.50 s vs. 30.00 s,P=0.003;8.60 mL vs. 11.22 mL,P=0.019）。研究组的器械成功率（98.0%）高于对照组（96.0%）,但差异无统计学意义（P=0.558）。两组均无动脉栓塞、二次干预和24 h内发生血肿情况。 结论：ExoSealTM封堵止血系统模拟器的训练能够提高股动脉封堵的安全性和有效性。该模拟器的训练应常规用于血管介入操作的基础教学培训中。     

Midterm outcomes of femoral arteries after percutaneous endovascular aortic repair using the Preclose technique

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous access during endovascular aortic repair has been shown to be feasible and safe using a suture-mediated closure device ("Preclose" technique) for closure of up to 24F introducer sheaths. The purpose of this study is to examine the late outcomes of those femoral arteries repaired in this manner. METHODS: The Preclose technique has been previously described. Briefly, the technique involves two Perclose Proglide devices deployed in the femoral artery prior to insertion of the large diameter introducer sheath and then closure of the arteriotomy by tying down knots of the Proglide following removal of the sheath. The medical records of all patients who underwent endovascular aortic repairs using the Preclose technique between December 2004 and August 2007 were reviewed. Follow-up protocol consisted of computed tomography (CT) angiograms performed at 1, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. All Preclose patients who had at least a 6-month postoperative scan were included in the study. For each patient, the most recent postoperative scan was compared with the preoperative scan for evidence of any new anatomic abnormalities of the femoral artery such as dissection, stenosis, or pseudoaneurysm. Three-dimensional post processing with multiplanar reconstructions was also performed as necessary to confirm axial scan findings. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients underwent percutaneous endovascular aortic repairs (TEVAR-125, EVAR-167). Four hundred thirty-two femoral arteries were closed with 870 devices. Four hundred eighteen vessels were approximated with two devices, while 30 arteries required three devices for hemostasis and an additional four vessels only required a single device. Two hundred seventy-eight (64.3%) vessels were accessed with sheaths 18 to 24F. Four hundred eight femoral arteries (94.4%) were closed successfully with the Preclose technique. There were 100 patients (TEVAR-35, EVAR-65) who had adequate postoperative CT scan at 6-months or later. The mean follow up was 11.6 +/- 5.0 months. Of the 156 femoral arteries in these 100 patients repaired using the Preclose technique, there were 3 late complications in 3 patients, 1 asymptomatic femoral artery dissection, and 2 femoral artery pseudoaneurysms requiring surgical repair, resulting in a late complication rate of 1.92% (3/156). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous closure of femoral arteries after large diameter introducer sheaths using the Preclose technique has a low incidence of early and late complications related to the closure site.     

Management of Vascular Complications following Femoral Artery Catheterization with and without Percutaneous Arterial Closure Devices

Percutaneous arterial closure devices allow earlier mobilization and discharge of patients after arterial catheterization than with manual compression for puncture site hemostasis. We reviewed our recent experience managing the complications of femoral artery catheterization with and without these devices on the vascular surgery service at a tertiary hospital. Thirty-one patients presenting over an 18-month period with complications after femoral artery catheterization with manual compression (n = 21) or percutaneous arterial closure devices (n = 10) were retrospectively reviewed.     

The use of closure devices

The use of arterial closure devices offers significant benefits over manual compression in achieving groin hemostasis following catheter-based procedures. Several currently available devices provide rapid puncture site closure with complication rates similar to that of manual compression. Closure devices allow for early times to ambulation and hospital discharge, and have a high degree of patient satisfaction. Their use may be of particular benefit inpatients that are anticoagulated. We believe that their use should be strongly considered in all patients following femoral artery catheterization.     

Acute Leg Ischemia: The Dark Side of a Percutaneous Femoral Artery Closure Device

The use of femoral artery closure devices to obtain hemostasis after percutaneous catheterization has become widespread because of their proven feasibility in combination with patient-related advantages. Since 2002 more than 6,500 patients have undergone either diagnostic angiography or therapeutic intervention via the femoral route with an Angioseal closure device in our hospital. We were faced with six cases of limb-threatening complications, which are described here. Most (5/6) complications were of obstructive origin due to traumatic dissection or occlusion of the artery mainly caused by malpositioning of the device. Recommendations are made in order to prevent or successfully overcome this certainly increasing problem in the vascular field.     

The efficacy and safety of closure of brachial access using the AngioSeal closure device: experience with 161 interventions in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia

PURPOSE: This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of the 6F Angio-Seal (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, Minn) as a closure device for transbrachial artery access for endovascular procedures in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia. METHODS: From January 2005 and September 2007, 1887 diabetic patients underwent interventional procedures in the lower limbs at a two diabetic foot centers. Patients presented with rest pain (16%), ulcers (80%), or gangrene (4%). Systemic anticoagulation with sodium heparin (70 IU/kg) was obtained for all patients at the beginning of the endovascular treatment. A total of 249 brachial arteries (238 patients) were evaluated for possible Angio-Seal use after endovascular recanalization of the leg. Color Doppler ultrasound imaging of the artery was obtained before revascularization only in patients with previous Angio-Seal placement in the brachial artery. No further imaging studies were done in the remaining brachial arteries where the Angio-Seal was deployed at the operator's discretion. Impairment or disappearance of the radial pulse or onsets of hand ischemia or hand pain, or impairment of hand function during or at the end of the endovascular revascularization were all regarded as contraindications to Angio-Seal usage. Evidence of a highly calcified plaque of the brachial artery access site at the time of vessel puncture was regarded as an absolute contraindication to the Angio-Seal use. Patients were seen before discharge, at 1, 3, and 8 weeks after the procedure, and at 3-month intervals thereafter. Complications included hemorrhage, pseudoaneurysm, infection, and vessel occlusion. RESULTS: A total of 1947 Angio-Seal collagen plugs were deployed in 1709 diabetic patients (90.5%). The Angio-Seal was used for brachial artery closure in 159 patients (8.4%) in 161 procedures (159 in the left, 2 in the right brachial artery). In 79 patients (4.2%) in 88 procedures (87 in the left and 1 in the right brachial artery), the device was deemed contraindicated due to small vessel size in 73 patients (92.4%) or presence of calcium at the access site in five patients (6.3%). One patient (1.3%) refused the collagen plug closure after revascularization. The non-Angio-Seal group was evaluated for comparison. The success rate for achieving hemostasis in the Angio-Seal group was 96.9%. Five major complications (3.1%) at 30 days consisted of two puncture site hematomas >4 cm, two brachial artery occlusions, and one brachial artery pseudoaneurysm, with three patients requiring open surgery. Minor complications (7.50%) were three puncture site hematomas < 4 cm, three oozing of blood from the access site, and six patients had mild pain in the cubital fossa. No further complications were recorded in the 14-month follow-up (range 1-25 months) of a total of 140 patients. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study shows that the 6F Angio-Seal is a valuable and safe vascular closure device for transbrachial access in diabetic patients undergoing interventional procedures for critical limb ischemia.     

Complications associated with the arterial puncture closure device--Angio-Seal

BACKGROUND: Arterial puncture closure devices (APCD) are frequently used after cardiac catheterization. Here, the diagnosis and therapy of femoral artery complications after the use of the Angio-Seal APCD is reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Angio-Seal APCD was deployed in 1600 patients undergoing transfemoral catheterization. RESULTS: In 7 of 1600 cases (0.4%) vascular complications occurred following Angio-Seal deployment. Diagnosis was made by duplex sonography. Intraoperative findings consisted of a complete occlusion with dissection of the femoral artery in all patients. In 6 cases, the femoral bifurcation had to be reconstructed after endarterectomy. Follow-up is complete with a mean of 6 months. CONCLUSION: The Angio-Seal device should not be used for closure of the superficial femoral artery and in patients with severe arteriosclerosis. The application of arteriography as well as the use of ultrasound-guided puncture is advisable. In all cases, surgical intervention was successful and an adequate therapy for management of complications.     

Totally percutaneous aortic aneurysm repair: experience and prudence

OBJECTIVE: Totally percutaneous aortic aneurysm repair has been shown to be technically feasible, with low morbidity. Complications from percutaneous arterial closure are not insignificant, however, and can be fatal. We sought to evaluate our experience with this technique, compare it with the published literature, and identify factors associated with conversion to open repair and complications. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. All patients who underwent percutaneous closure of large-bore-sheath (>12F) access sites with off-label use of a suture-mediated closure device (Prostar XL) between December 2002 and August 2005 were reviewed. Outcome measures evaluated were rates of technical success, conversion to open femoral arterial repair, and complications. Axial diameter measurements of the accessed vessels were assessed with computed tomographic (CT) angiography both before and after the procedure. Patient variables were compared by using chi2, Fisher exact, and paired and independent samples t tests where appropriate. The mean follow-up interval was 1.5 years. RESULTS: During the study period, 49 patients underwent percutaneous closure of 79 large-bore-sheath access sites after successful endovascular aneurysm repair. Seven patients (14%) were morbidly obese (body mass index >35 kg/m2). Successful closure was achieved in 74 access sites (93.7%). Percutaneous closure was unsuccessful in five access sites (6.3%), all of which required open femoral repair at the same setting. Two converted patients experienced complications (4.1%): one retroperitoneal hematoma requiring transfusion of blood products and one iliac artery injury leading to death from myocardial infarction. Both of these patients were morbidly obese. Both complications occurred after closure of larger than 20F sheath sites. Morbid obesity and sheath size greater than 20F were associated with a significantly increased complication rate (P = .02 and P = .01, respectively). No thrombotic or infectious complications occurred in this series. Upon comparison of preoperative and postoperative CT angiograms, one (1.3%) small pseudoaneurysm was detected. No arteriovenous fistulas or hematomas larger than 3 cm were detected. The pseudoaneurysm occurred after closure of a 20F sheath access site. There were no significant differences in minimum intraluminal (7.38 +/- 1.8 vs 7.48 +/- 1.8) or maximum extraluminal (11.25 +/- 2.8 vs 12.02 +/- 2.7) diameters between preoperative and postoperative CT angiograms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Totally percutaneous aortic aneurysm repair is technically feasible in most cases, with no effect on the luminal diameter of the accessed femoral artery. Complications occur more often in morbidly obese patients and with sheaths larger than 20F. These complications can be minimized with meticulous technique and good patient selection. The capability for expeditious open femoral arterial repair is mandatory with this approach.     

Emerging role of endovascular grafts in complex aortoiliac occlusive disease

BACKGROUND: Aortobifemoral bypass is the standard therapy for complex aortoiliac occlusive disease. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of endovascular grafts as an alternative to aortobifemoral bypass in patients with advanced aortoiliac occlusive disease at high risk. METHODS: Endovascular grafts were placed in 23 limbs in 22 patients with TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus document (TASC) type C and D lesions. All procedures were performed in the operating room, and images were obtained with portable digital fluoroscopy. Surgical exposure of the ipsilateral common femoral artery was performed to enable safe closure of 9F to 12F sheath sites and to facilitate ipsilateral interventions in the distal external iliac artery. Concomitant infrainguinal outflow procedures were performed in 6 patients. RESULTS: Twenty of 22 patients were men; mean patient age was 63.2 +/- 3.2 years. Indications for intervention were rest pain in 12 of 23 limbs and tissue loss in 9 of 22 limbs. Risk factors included hostile abdomen or pelvis in 8 patients, coronary artery disease in 11 patients, end-stage renal disease in 3 patients, and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 3 patients. Each patient received a mean of 1.6 grafts. Initial technical success was 95.2%, with one technical failure. There was no 30-day mortality. All patients experienced at least one grade improvement per Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards. Primary patency at 24 months was 84.2% +/- 8.0%, with a limb salvage rate of 95.3% +/- 5.0%. Mean (+/- SD) ankle brachial index improved from 0.49 +/- 0.22 to 0.87 +/- 0.26 (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Endovascular grafting to treat advanced aortoiliac occlusive disease can be accomplished with good clinical outcome and acceptable short-term patency. This endovascular technique can be a viable alternative to conventional surgical revascularization in patients with advanced aortoiliac occlusive disease at high risk.     

A novel access method for endovascular procedures in the porcine model

Objective To evaluate the use of the saphenous artery as an alternative access for endovascular procedures in the porcine model. Methods Fourteen adult pigs (25-35kg) were used in this study, 3 pigs from an acute study and 11 from chronic studies. A 2-3 cm incision was made and a saphenous artery cutdown was performed in 24 sides. Micropunc ture sets (Boston Scientific) or 18 G puncture needles were used to access the artery. Different sizes of introducers (4-7F) were used to establish endovascular access. Angiographic catheters were then used to confirm if the access was usable. Four saphenous arteries were explanted in the pigs from a chronic study 4 to 28 days after surgical procedure. Results The saphenous artery was very easy to expose and 4-5 F introducer sheaths were able to be inserted to establish access for endovascular procedures in the pigs. The saphenous artery was unable to accomodate an introducer with a size larger than 6 F. Four saphenous arteries were injured when 5 and 6 F introducers were used, but angiographic procedures could still be performed. Morphologic evaluation of the explanted arteries demonstrated occlusion of the saphenous arteries without injury or disruption of the adjacent femoral arteries. Conclusion The saphenous artery can be used as an access site in pigs for angiographic and interventional procedures if the catheter size is less than 6 F. This vessel is easier to access and can preserve the femoral artery for repeat procedures in the future.     

A reconsideration of cerebral perfusion in aortic arch replacement

Ten patients underwent aortic arch replacement for aneurysmal disease from 1970 to 1985 using a simplified cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) technique with partial brachiocephalic perfusion, low CPB flow (30 to 50 ml/kg/min), moderate systemic cooling (26 degrees to 28 degrees C), and topical hypothermic myocardial protection. The arterial line from a single pump head has a Y shape to perfuse the femoral artery (20F cannula) and either the innominate or left carotid artery (14F). Of the 10 patients (mean age, 58 years) with arch aneurysm (6 atherosclerotic, 2 dissections, and 2 degenerative), 3 had previously undergone major cardiovascular operations. Concomitant procedures included aortic valve replacement in 4 and coronary artery bypass grafting in 3. Eight patients survived the procedure, and 1 died three weeks after operation of a ruptured abdominal aneurysm. Among the survivors, CPB time was 119 +/- 36 minutes (+/- standard deviation), myocardial ischemia time was 79 +/- 32 minutes, and intraoperative blood requirement was 5.9 +/- 3.4 units. There were no postoperative strokes. Neurological complications were only minor and included an asymptomatic miosis and ulnar nerve paresthesias in 1 patient and transient vocal cord palsy in another. Applicable in most patients undergoing elective resection of degenerative and atherosclerotic arch aneurysms and in selected patients with arch dissections, this simplified technique of brachiocephalic perfusion without circulatory arrest provides an attractive and safe alternative; the potential advantages are technical simplicity, reduced CPB and operating times, and satisfactory cerebral protection.     

Closure of carotid artery puncture site with a percutaneous device

The surgical treatment of traumatic neck injuries in patients with hostile anatomy is associated with higher risk of complications, due to the technical challenge and associated clinical conditions. The use of a percutaneous closure device for removal of a 7.5 Fr sheath, nonintentionally implanted into the carotid artery, is reported. The right common carotid sheath was removed after introducing a 0.035-inch guidewire; the Angioseal 8 Fr device was then introduced over the wire, successfully sealing the puncture site. Duplex scan control showed patency of the carotids, sealing of the puncture, and adequate flow in the jugular vein and carotid arteries. This maneuver allowed the safe placement of a percutaneous arterial device (Angioseal) to close the puncture site.     

Femoral artery pressures are more reliable than radial artery pressures on initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVE: To compare radial and femoral artery perfusion pressure during initiation and various stages of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: The cardiac center of a tertiary referral teaching institute. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty consecutive patients of all ages undergoing a variety of cardiac operations. INTERVENTIONS: Radial and femoral arterial pressures were measured in all patients on the same transducer, from the beginning to end of CPB. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean perfusion pressures on CPB measured at the femoral artery at 1, 5, 10, and 15 minutes of CPB were 38.4+/-3.6, 46.2+/-3.1, 49.7+/-3.9, and 52.8+/-4.1 mmHg and were significantly greater than the corresponding radial artery pressures (29.9+/-4.1, 35.3+/-6.1, 40.9+/-4.8, and 41.8+/-5.3 mmHg) (p < 0.001). At 30 minutes and 60 minutes of CPB, femoral artery pressures are higher (60.3+/-8.8 mmHg and 66.4+/-8.2 mmHg) compared with radial artery pressures (54.7+/-6.9 mmHg and 59.6+/-6.1 mmHg), but the difference is less significant (p < 0.05). On conclusion of CPB, mean femoral artery pressures (70.9+/-6.7 mmHg) are greater than mean radial artery pressures (67.6+/-8.1 mmHg) (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Although radial artery pressures are more commonly monitored during cardiac surgery, femoral artery perfusion pressures are more reliable during the initial part of CPB, and routine monitoring of femoral artery pressures may prevent vasoconstrictor use on initiation of CPB.     

Arterioarterial prosthetic loop: a new approach for hemodialysis access

OBJECTIVES: In this report we present a novel procedure that uses an arterioarterial prosthetic loop (AAPL) with the proximal axillary or the femoral artery as a vascular access for hemodialysis in patients who have inadequate vascular conditions for creating an arteriovenous fistula or graft. METHODS: Between April 1996 and September 2004, 34 patients received 36 AAPLs as vascular access, either as an axillary chest loop (n = 31) or as a femoral loop (n = 5). In this procedure the artery is ligated between the anastomoses to direct flow through the AAPL. Data from all patients undergoing the procedure were prospectively collected. RESULTS: The indication for an AAPL was the unsuitability of large deep veins in 64%, steal syndrome in 11%, the combination of only a suitable femoral vein and severe peripheral arterial disease in 22%, and congestive heart failure in 3%. All AAPLs were cannulated 18 +/- 4 days postoperatively. Mean follow-up was 31 months (range, 1 to 83). Primary patency was 73% and secondary patency was 96% at 1 year; these rates at 3 years were 54% and 87%, respectively. The rate of all interventions for the maintenance of AAPL function was 0.47 procedures per patient year. Four grafts were abandoned. More than 11,000 hemodialyses with proven efficiency were performed. CONCLUSIONS: The AAPL is an unusual but useful and easy-to-perform alternative procedure to create vascular access for hemodialysis. It can provide survival for strictly selected patients in whom conventional vascular access is not possible. The axillary chest AAPL is preferred.     

Development and clinical application of minimally invasive cardiac surgery using percutaneous cardiopulmonary support.

OBJECTIVES: Optimal cardiopulmonary support during minimally invasive cardiac surgery remains controversial. We developed cardiopulmonary bypass for minimally invasive cardiac surgery using percutaneous peripheral cannulation. METHODS: Subjects were 34 patients (age: 58 +/- 13 years; range: 17-73) undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery using percutaneous cardiopulmonary support between June 1997 and March 1999. Procedures included atrial septal defect closure (n = 14), partial atrioventricular septal defect closure (n = 1), mitral valve replacement (n = 8), mitral valve repair (n = 3), aortic valve replacement (n = 6), coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 1), and right atrial myxoma extirpation (n = 1). Bicaval venous drainage from the right internal jugular vein and the femoral vein and arterial return to the femoral artery were instituted by percutaneous cannulation. Venous drainage was implemented by negative pressure (-20 to -40 mmHg) and arterial return was by conventional roller pump. All procedures were conducted through a skin incision 8 +/- 1 cm, from 6 to 10 cm and partial sternotomy. Aortic cross clamping and cardioplegic solution were administered in the surgical field. RESULTS: The operation lasted 224 +/- 45 min., cardiopulmonary bypass 104 +/- 32 min., and aortic clamping 77 +/- 23 min.. No deaths occurred. One patient with residual atrial septal defect required reoperation through the same skin incision. Only 1 patient required homologous blood transfusion. The average postoperative hospital stay was 15 +/- 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery using percutaneous cardiopulmonary support is safe and an excellent option for selected patients affected by single valve lesion, simple cardiac anomalies, and coronary artery bypass grafting.     

The use of a percutaneous closure device for closure of an accidental puncture of the aortic arch; a simple solution for a difficult problem.

Percutaneous closure devices are now often used for closure of the femoral puncture site after percutaneous vascular interventions. We describe a case were an accidental puncture in the aortic arch during placement of a central venous catheter is successfully closed with a closure device.     

主动脉腔内修复术双Perclose ProGlide交叉缝合与传统缝合穿刺点的疗效比较

目的通过与传统缝合比较,探讨主动脉腔内修复术采用双Perclose ProGlide交叉缝合修复20F或22F穿刺点的优缺点,为临床穿刺点修复方法选择提供参考。方法 2007年6月-2011年5月,103例115侧采用外径为20F或22F输送鞘行主动脉腔内修复术,其中采用双Perclose ProGlide交叉缝合修复穿刺点57例64侧(双Perclose组),传统缝合修复46例51侧(传统缝合组)。两组患者年龄、性别、病程等一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。结果双Perclose组不同病种患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间均明显优于传统缝合组(P<0.05)。术后双Perclose组5例(5侧)、传统缝合组2例(2侧)出现不同程度腹股沟区皮下瘀血;双Perclose组2例(2侧)皮肤穿刺点处淋巴漏,传统缝合组6例(8侧)切口发生淋巴漏。双Perclose组术后早期并发症发生率为7.8%(5/64),传统缝合组为15.7%(8/51),比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.76,P=0.19)。双Perclose组技术成功率为96.9%(62/64),传统缝合组为100%(51/51),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.31,P=0.50)。两组患者术后均获随访,双Perclose组随访时间2～19个月,平均15个月;传统缝合组随访时间2～18个月,平均14个月。双Perclose组1例(1侧)术后3个月出现原穿刺点处假性动脉瘤,给予切开缝合;其余患者无缝合动脉狭窄、假性动脉瘤形成等中期并发症发生。双Perclose组中期并发症发生率为1.6%(1/64),传统缝合组为0,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。结论与传统缝合技术相比,双PercloseProGlide交叉缝合技术修复主动脉腔内修复术中20F或22F穿刺点疗效相似,但在控制手术时间、术中出血量及住院时间方面具有明显优势。     

Management of infected femoral closure devices

An increase in infectious complications has been noted with the introduction of percutaneous femoral artery closure devices. We report five cases of infected groins and/or femoral arteries following angiographic procedures that were completed using the Perclose Suture Mediated Closure Device (Perclose). Each patient required drainage of the abscess and removal of the Perclose suture. Most patients required more extensive vascular reconstructive procedures. When these complications arise, we recommend expeditious drainage of the abscess, removal of the suture, and adequate exposure of the femoral artery to facilitate repair of the vessel.