Short-term sexual function after prostate brachytherapy

Sexual function was evaluated in 34 patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PSA < or = 10, Gleason score < or = 6, clinical stage T1/T2) undergoing brachytherapy in a phase III prospective randomized trial comparing iodine-125 ((125)I) to palladium-103 ((103)Pd). The mean and median International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores for the entire group were 14.2 and 16.5, respectively, and there was no difference between these scores when stratified by isotope. IIEF scores < 6, 6 to 11, and > or = 12 were recorded in 35% (12/34), 6% (2/34), and 59% (20/34) of patients, respectively. Hematospermia, orgasmalgia (pain at the time of orgasm), and alteration in intensity of orgasm were documented in 26% (9/34), 15% (5/34), and 38% (13/34) of patients, respectively, but these side effects were of limited duration for most patients. There was no relationship between radiation dose to the neurovascular bundles (NVB), which averaged 209% of the prescribed prostate dose, and the development of postbrachytherapy impotence. All four impotent patients who used sildenafil responded favorably. With a median follow-up of 13 months, 65% of patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy maintained sexual function without pharmacologic support. Including sildenafil responses, 76.5% of patients sustained erections sufficient for sexual intercourse.     

Prostatourethral-rectal fistula after prostate brachytherapy

BACKGROUND: Brachytherapy (BT) has seen increased utilization as a potentially curative treatment for patients with localized initial or recurrent prostate carcinoma. This modality can be delivered by palladium 103 (Pd(103)) or iodine 125 (I(125)) implant with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Prostatourethral-rectal fistula (PRF) is a serious complication of this approach, and its incidence, clinical presentation, and risk factors for occurrence have not been documented thoroughly. Thus, the authors sought to determine these factors in a large series of patients who were treated at two institutions. METHODS: Seven hundred sixty-five patients received outpatient BT using a computed tomography (CT)-guided or transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided technique between July 1994 and June 1999 using either Pd(103) or I(125) implants. Of the 754 patients with follow-up, 640 patients received BT monotherapy, 69 patients received BT monotherapy as a boost after EBRT, and 45 patients received BT as salvage therapy after locally recurrent prostate carcinoma that was treated initially with BT (20 patients), EBRT (20 patients), surgery plus EBRT (3 patients), surgery and high dose rate radiotherapy (HDR) (1 patient), or EBRT plus HDR (1 patient). CT dosimetry of the TRUS-guided implants was carried out in all patients 1-7 days postprocedure. Patient follow-up and clinical status were compiled in a data base. RESULTS: Seven PRFs developed in 754 patients (1%) between 9 months and 12 months after treatment. One PRF (0.2%) occurred in patients who were treated with BT monotherapy. PRFs occurred in patients who were treated with combination therapy (2 of 69 patients; 2.9%) and in patients who underwent salvage BT (4 of 45 patients; 8.8%) patients. All six patients who developed fistulas in the context of combination BT/EBRT or salvage BT had biopsy of an anterior rectal lesion overlying the prostate noted on physical examination during routine follow-up. Gastrointestinal endoscopic evaluation alone was not associated with any PRF. Five of the seven PRFs resolved with either surgical repair (3 patients) or conservative management (2 patients). CONCLUSIONS: There is a low incidence of PRF formation after BT monotherapy. Because all patients who developed PRF did so subsequent to prior rectal biopsies, the authors currently are discouraging such practices strongly if the rectal lesion is consistent with radiation-induced effects.     

Dysuria after permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: Although numerous prostate cancer quality-of-life studies have been reported, a paucity of data exists regarding brachytherapy-related dysuria. In this study, we evaluated the incidence and temporal resolution of dysuria, along with the influence of multiple treatment, clinical, and dosimetric parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five hundred eighty-one consecutive patients without a preimplant history of transurethral resection of the prostate underwent brachytherapy between January 1998 and December 2001 for clinical T1c-T3a (1997 AJCC) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland. The evaluated population consisted of the 546 patients who had completed at least two postimplant dysuria evaluations. The median patient follow-up was 26.4 months. In all patients, alpha-blocker therapy was initiated before implantation and continued at least until the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) returned to baseline. The frequency of dysuria was assessed on a 1-5 scale using the IPSS scoring criteria. The dysuria severity was scored on a 1-10 scale. The clinical parameters evaluated included age, T stage, preimplant IPSS, ultrasound volume, and elapsed time since implantation. The treatment parameters included the use of neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation, use of supplemental external beam radiotherapy, isotope, and total implanted seed strength. The dosimetric parameters included values of the minimal dose received by 90% of the prostate, the percentage of prostate volume receiving 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescribed minimal peripheral dose, and the median and maximal urethral doses. RESULTS: The incidence of dysuria peaked at 52% 1 month after implantation. The median dysuria frequency score was 0 of 5 for all patients and 2 of 5 for those reporting dysuria. The median severity score was 0 of 10 for the entire cohort and 3 of 10 for those reporting dysuria. For the entire group, both the frequency and the severity of dysuria steadily improved with time, with near complete resolution of dysuria at 45 months. For those patients reporting dysuria, neither the frequency nor the severity revealed any durable improvement for approximately 36 months. Patients with dysuria displayed higher postimplant IPSSs. Of the 7 IPSS questions, nocturia and incomplete voiding were the best surrogates for dysuria. The isotope, supplemental external beam radiotherapy, hormonal status, minimal dose received by 90% of the prostate, and urethral dose did not predict for dysuria. CONCLUSIONS: After permanent prostate brachytherapy, dysuria is a relatively common event, but only rarely severe in frequency or intensity. At approximately 45 months after brachytherapy, dysuria appears to resolve in almost all patients.     

Erectile function after prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate erectile function after permanent prostate brachytherapy using a validated patient-administered questionnaire and to determine the effect of multiple clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters on penile erectile function. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 226 patients with preimplant erectile function determined by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire underwent permanent prostate brachytherapy in two prospective randomized trials between February 2001 and January 2003 for clinical Stage T1c-T2c (2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer) prostate cancer. Of the 226 patients, 132 were potent before treatment and, of those, 128 (97%) completed and returned the IIEF questionnaire after brachytherapy. The median follow-up was 29.1 months. Potency was defined as an IIEF score of > or =13. The clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters evaluated included patient age; preimplant IIEF score; clinical T stage; pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level; Gleason score; elapsed time after implantation; preimplant nocturnal erections; body mass index; presence of hypertension or diabetes mellitus; tobacco consumption; the volume of the prostate gland receiving 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescribed dose (V(100/150/200)); the dose delivered to 90% of the prostate gland (D(90)); androgen deprivation therapy; supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT); isotope; prostate volume; planning volume; and radiation dose to the proximal penis. RESULTS: The 3-year actuarial rate of potency preservation was 50.5%. For patients who maintained adequate posttreatment erectile function, the preimplant IIEF score was 29, and in patients with brachytherapy-related ED, the preimplant IIEF score was 25. The median time to the onset of ED was 5.4 months. After brachytherapy, the median IIEF score was 20 in potent patients and 3 in impotent patients. On univariate analysis, the preimplant IIEF score, patient age, presence of nocturnal erections, and dose to the proximal penis predicted for postimplant erectile function. However, in multivariate analysis, only the preimplant IIEF score and the D(50) to the proximal crura were statistically significant predictors of brachytherapy-related erectile function. CONCLUSIONS: Using a patient-administered validated quality-of-life instrument, brachytherapy-induced ED occurred in 50% of patients at 3 years. On multivariate analysis, preimplant erectile function and the D(50) to the proximal crura were the best predictors of brachytherapy-related erectile function. Because the proximal penis is the most significant treatment-related predictor of brachytherapy-related ED, techniques to minimize the radiation dose to the proximal penis may result in improved rates of potency preservation.     

Erectile function after permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of potency preservation after permanent prostate brachytherapy using a validated patient-administered questionnaire and to evaluate the effect of multiple clinical and treatment parameters on penile erectile function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty-five patients underwent permanent prostate brachytherapy from April 1995 to October 1999. Two hundred nine patients who were potent before brachytherapy and who at the time of the survey were not receiving hormonal therapy were mailed the specific erectile questions of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire with a self-addressed stamped envelope. The questionnaire consisted of 5 questions, with a maximal score of 25. Of the 209 patients, 181 (87%) completed and returned the questionnaire. The mean and median follow-up was 40.4 +/- 14.9 and 40.6 months, respectively (range 19-75). Preimplant erectile function was assigned using a three-tiered scoring system (2 = erections always or nearly always sufficient for vaginal penetration; 1 = erections sufficient for vaginal penetration but considered suboptimal; 0 = the inability to obtain erections and/or erections inadequate for vaginal penetration). Postimplant potency was defined as an IIEF score >/=11. The clinical parameters evaluated for erectile function included patient age, preimplant potency, clinical T-stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, elapsed time after implantation, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and tobacco consumption. Treatment parameters included radiation dose to the prostate gland, use of hormonal manipulation, use of supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), choice of isotope, prostate volume, and planning volume. The efficacy of sildenafil citrate in brachytherapy-induced erectile dysfunction (ED) was also evaluated. RESULTS: Pretreatment erectile function scores of 2 and 1 were assigned to 125 and 56 patients, respectively. With a 6-year follow-up, 39% of patients maintained potency after prostate brachytherapy, with a plateau on the potency preservation curve. Postimplant preservation of potency (IIEF >/=11) correlated with preimplant erectile function (50.4% vs. 13.2% for preimplant scores of 2 and 1, respectively, p <0.001), patient age (57.4%, 38.2%, and 21.9% for patients <60, 60-69, and >/=70 years old, respectively, p <0.004), use of supplemental EBRT (52.0% vs. 26.4% for patients without and with EBRT, p <0.001), and a history of diabetes mellitus (41.4% vs. 0% for patients without and with diabetes, respectively, p = 0.017). In multivariate analysis, clinical stage, radiation dose to the prostate gland, hormonal manipulation, choice of isotope, history of hypertension, and tobacco consumption had no effect on the ultimate preservation of potency. Only the preimplant potency score, use of supplemental EBRT, and diabetes maintained statistical significance. Sixty-two patients used sildenafil, with 53 (85%) reporting a favorable response. When potent patients were grouped with the ED patients who used sildenafil, the 6-year actuarial rate of potency preservation was 92%. Including the 70 impotent patients who never used sildenafil, the actuarial 6-year rate of potency preservation with and without pharmacologic support was 54% and 39%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that brachytherapy-induced ED is more common than previously reported and may be the result of obtaining patient information by means of a validated quality-of-life instrument by mail and not by personal interview. In multivariate analysis, only pretreatment potency, supplemental EBRT, and diabetes maintained statistical significance. Most patients with brachytherapy-induced ED responded favorably to sildenafil. Although the 6-year actuarial incidence of potency preservation was 39%, 52% of patients not receiving supplemental EBRT maintained potency. In addition, with pharmacologic support, 92% of patients maintained potency.     

Late rectal function after prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: Using a patient-administered quality of life instrument, to evaluate the effect of permanent prostate brachytherapy on late rectal function. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred eighty-nine prostate brachytherapy patients were mailed the Rectal Function Assessment Score (R-FAS), with a prestamped return envelope. The R-FAS consists of nine questions and a scoring range of 0-27, with higher scores indicative of poorer bowel function. One hundred eighty-seven (98.4%) surveys were returned. The median follow-up was 66.3 months (range 54-92 months). Clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters evaluated for bowel dysfunction included patient age, diabetes, hypertension, tobacco consumption, clinical T-stage, elapsed time since implant, prostate ultrasound volume, planning target volume, hormonal status, supplemental external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), isotope, average, median and maximum rectal doses, total implanted seed strength, values of the minimum dose received by 90% of the prostate gland (D(90)), and the percent prostate volume receiving 100%, 150%, and 200% of the minimum prescribed dose (V(100/150/200)). RESULTS: The R-FAS score for the evaluated cohort was 3.92, which represented a slight improvement from the 1999 survey score of 4.15 (p = 0.29). Of the evaluated clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters, the number of preimplant bowel movements, a history of tobacco consumption, and the median rectal dose correlated with the R-FAS. Although lower rectal doses were noted with Pd-103, isotope did not predict for bowel function. Only 12% (23/187) of patients reported their bowel function to be worse after implantation. Patient perception of overall rectal quality of life was inversely related to the use of supplemental EBRT (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Minor bowel changes are noted following prostate brachytherapy. The vast majority of patients did not report any deterioration in bowel function. In addition, the R-FAS continue to improve with time.     

Potency after permanent prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

The evaluation of potency preservation after treatment of localized prostate cancer with transperineal permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) and the efficacy of sildenafil were studied.

This study comprised 482 patients who were able to maintain an erection suitable for intercourse before treatment from a cohort of 1166 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with PPB. All patients have been followed prospectively, and actuarial analysis was performed to assess potency preservation over time. Patients treated with sildenafil were evaluated as to its efficacy.

The median follow-up of this cohort was 34 months (6–92), with a median age of 68 years (47–80). Potency was preserved in 311 of the 482 patients, with a 5-year actuarial potency rate of 52.7%. The 5-year actuarial potency rate for patients treated with PPB as monotherapy was 76%, and, for those treated with combination external beam radiotherapy (EBT) + PPB, 56% (p = 0.08). Patients treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAAD) + PPB had a 5-year potency rate of 52%, whereas those with combination EBT + PPB + NAAD had a potency rate of 29% (p = 0.13). Cox regression analysis identified that pretreatment use of NAAD and patient age predicted for impotence (p = 0.0001 and 0.04, respectively). Of 84 patients treated with sildenafil, 52 had a successful outcome (62%). The response to sildenafil was significantly better in those patients not treated with NAAD (p = 0.04).

The actuarial potency rates at 5 years for patients treated with PPB are lower than generally acknowledged, except for those patients treated with PPB as monotherapy. Patients who received sildenafil exhibited improved potency in a majority of cases.     

Prostate-specific antigen spikes after permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether any clinical, treatment, or dosimetric parameters correlated with the development of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) spike after permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The evaluated population consisted of 218 hormone-naive patients free of biochemical or clinical failure who underwent permanent prostate brachytherapy with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy for clinical Stage T1b-T3a adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland (1997 AJCC) between August 1995 and November 1999. No patient underwent pre- or postimplant hormonal manipulation, pretreatment seminal vesicle biopsy, or pathologic lymph node staging. In addition, none of the 218 patients possessed equivocal biochemical results (one or two consecutive PSA rises or a declining PSA >1.0 ng/mL). The median patient follow-up was 46.2 months. A PSA spike was defined as a rise of >or=0.2 ng/mL, followed by a durable decline. The clinical parameters evaluated included patient age, clinical T stage, Gleason score, pretreatment PSA level, prostate volume, brachytherapy planning volume, and patient follow-up in months. The evaluated treatment parameters included isotope and use of supplemental external beam radiotherapy. The dosimetric parameters evaluated included the minimal dose received by 90% of the prostate gland (D(90)), the percentage of the prostate volume receiving 100% (V(100)), 150%, and 200% (V(200)) of the prescribed minimal peripheral dose, and the mean, median, maximal, and minimal urethral doses. Biochemical disease-free survival was defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition with the additional constraint that the most recent PSA level was 0.2 to 0.5 to 1.0 ng/mL (20%, 50%, and 80%, respectively, p <0.001). In Cox multivariate regression analysis, patient age, clinical stage, first postimplant PSA level, and V(150) were predictive for the development of a PSA spike. A postimplant dosimetric threshold of either <115% of the minimal peripheral dose for D(90) or <55% of the prostate volume for V(150) was strongly predictive of a spike. When the variables only determinable after the occurrence of the PSA spike were included in the multivariate analysis, V(150), preimplant PSA level, and nadir PSA were the significant predictors. CONCLUSION: Of the patients, 23.9% developed a PSA spike with a median time to development of 16.3 months and a median prespike and median postspike PSA of 0.50 ng/mL and 0.90 ng/mL, respectively. In multivariate analysis, patient age, clinical stage, first postimplant PSA level, and V(150) were predictive for the development of a PSA spike. At approximately 66 months after implantation, the PSA curves converged for spike and nonspike patients, with a median PSA level <0.1 ng/mL.     

Radiation exposure after permanent prostate brachytherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Limited information is available on the true radiation exposure and associated risks for the relatives of the patients submitted to prostate brachytherapy with permanent implant of radioactive sources and for any other people coming into contact with them. In order to provide appropriate information, we analyzed the radiation exposure data from 216 prostate cancer patients who underwent (125)I or (103)Pd implants at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan, Italy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1999 and October 2004, 216 patients with low risk prostate carcinoma were treated with (125)I (200 patients) or (103)Pd (16 patients) permanent seed implantation. One day after the procedure, radiation exposure measurements around the patients were performed using an ionization chamber survey meter (Victoreen RPO-50) calibrated in dose rate at an accredited calibration center (calibration Centre SIT 104). RESULTS: The mean dose rate at the posterior skin surface (gluteal region) following (125)I implants was 41.3 microSv/h (range: 6.2-99.4 microSv/h) and following (103)Pd implants was 18.9 microSv/h (range 5.0-37.3 microSv/h). The dose rate at 50 cm from the skin decreased to the mean value of 6.4 microSv/h for the (125)I implants and to the mean value of 1.7 microSv/h for the (103)Pd implants. Total times required to reach the annual dose limit (1 mSv/year) recommended for the general population by the European Directive 96/29/Euratom and by the Italian law (Decreto Legislativo 241/2000) at a distance of 50 cm from the posterior skin surface of the implanted patient would be 7.7 and 21.6 days for (125)I and for (103)Pd. Good correlation between the measured dose rates and both the total implanted activity and the distance between the most posteriorly implanted seed and the skin surface of the patients was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the dose rates at 50 cm away from the prostate brachytherapy patients are very low and that the doses possibly absorbed by the relatives and other members of the general population coming into contact with the treated patients are well below the dose limit set by the European Directive and by the Italian regulation. However, in order to meet the recommendation of the ALARA principle (As Low As Reasonably/Readily Achievable), some advice to the patients should be given, such as to maintain a minimum distance from the patient of 1m, at least for a period equal to one half life of used radionuclide (60 days for (125)I and 15 days for (103)Pd).     

Late rectal complications after prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

This review of the literature on late rectal complications after prostate brachytherapy indicated that it is a highly effective treatment modality for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer but can cause chronic radiation proctitis. The most common manifestation of chronic radiation proctitis was anterior rectal wall bleeding, which often occurred within the first 2 years after brachytherapy. It is interesting to note that the rates of late rectal morbidity appear to have declined over time, which may reflect improvements in implantation techniques and imaging. Rectal biopsy as part of the workup to evaluate rectal bleeding can lead to rectal fistula and the need for colostomy, a rare but major complication. The authors recommend 1) screening colonoscopy before brachytherapy for patients who have not had a screening colonoscopy within the preceding 3 years to rule out colorectal malignancies and, thus, facilitate conservative management should rectal bleeding occur; 2) lifestyle modifications during treatment to limit exposure of the rectum to radiation; and 3) conservative management for rectal bleeding that occurs within 2 years after brachytherapy. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Salvage brachytherapy after external-beam irradiation for prostate cancer

The options available for patients with recurrent prostate cancer are limited. Men who have failed external-beam irradiation as the primary treatment are rarely considered for potentially curative salvage therapy. Traditionally, only palliative treatments have been offered with hormonal intervention or simple observation. A significant percentage of these patients have only locally recurrent cancer and are thus candidates for curative salvage therapy. Permanent brachytherapy with iodine-125 or palladium-103 has been used in an attempt to eradicate the remaining prostate cancer and prevent the need for additional intervention. It is critical in this population to identify patients most likely to have distant metastases or who are unlikely to suffer death or morbidity from their recurrence, in order to avoid potential treatment morbidity in those unlikely to benefit from any intervention. Following salvage brachytherapy, up to 98% of these cancers may be locally controlled, and 5-year freedom from second relapse is approximately 50%. With careful case selection, relapse-free rates up to 83% may be achieved. A schema is presented, suggesting that it may be possible to identify the patients most likely to benefit from salvage treatment based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics and other features. Such features include histologically confirmed local recurrence, clinical and radiologic evidence of no distant disease, adequate urinary function, age, and overall health indicative of at least a 5- to 10-year life expectancy, prolonged disease-free interval (> 2 years), slow PSA doubling time, Gleason sum < or = 6, and PSA < 10 ng/mL.     

Five-year potency preservation after iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy

Background

We aimed to evaluate long-term erectile function following prostate brachytherapy, based on patient characteristics and treatment factors.

Methods

Between 2003 and 2006, 665 men with localized prostate cancer were treated with ¹²⁵I permanent seed implantation. None was given adjuvant hormone therapy. Erectile function was assessed before treatment, and at 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after implantation using the Mount Sinai Erectile Function Score (MSEFS) of 0–3 (0 = no erections, 1 = erections insufficient for intercourse, 2 = suboptimal erections but sufficient for intercourse, 3 = normal erectile function). Potency was defined as score 2 or 3, and 382 men were potent before treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the data from these 382 patients to identify variables associated with potency preservation.

Results

In patients who were potent before treatment, the actuarial potency preservation rate fell to 46.2 % at 6 months after brachytherapy, and then slowly recovered reaching 52.0 % at 5 years after brachytherapy. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, patient age (p = 0.04) and pre-treatment MSEFS (p < 0.001) were predictors of 5-year potency preservation. Neoadjuvant hormone therapy affected potency preservation only at 6 months after brachytherapy.

Conclusions

Patient age at implantation and pre-treatment erectile function are predictive factors for the development of erectile dysfunction following prostate brachytherapy.     

Factors predicting for urinary incontinence after prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To define risk factors that predict for urinary incontinence after (125)I prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Urinary incontinence after (125)I prostate brachytherapy was evaluated using a patient self-assessment questionnaire based on the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2). Grade 0 is defined as no incontinence; Grade 1 incontinence occurs with coughing, sneezing, or laughing; Grade 2 is spontaneous incontinence with some control; and Grade 3 is no control. One hundred fifty-three patients received monotherapy (145 Gy) (125)I implants between October 1996 and December 2001, and 112 (75%) responded to our survey. Median follow-up was 47 months (range, 14-74 months). Patient characteristics included a preimplant prostate-specific antigen < or =10, Gleason score < or =6, and stage < or =T2b. CT-based postimplant dosimetry was analyzed approximately 30 days after the procedure, and dose-volume histograms of the prostate and the prostatic urethra were generated based on contoured volumes. Dosimetric parameters evaluated as predictive factors for incontinence included the prostate volume; total activity implanted; number of needles; number of seeds; seed activity; urethral D(5), D(10), D(25), D(50), D(75), and D(90) doses; prostate D(90) doses; and prostate V(100), V(200), and V(300). Clinical parameters evaluated included age, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen, preimplant International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS), and length of follow-up. RESULTS: Urethral D(10) dose and preimplant I-PSS predicted for urinary incontinence on multivariate analysis (p = 0.002 and p = 0.003, respectively). Twenty-eight patients reported Grade 1 incontinence (26%), and 5 patients reported Grade 2 (5%). Patients with Grade 1 and 2 incontinence were analyzed together, because of the small number of patients who experienced Grade 2. No patients reported Grade 3 incontinence. Mean urethral D(10) was 314 +/- 78 Gy in patients with Grade 0 compared with 394 +/- 147 Gy in patients with Grades 1, 2 incontinence (p = 0.002). The incidence of incontinence doubled as the urethral D(10) dose increased above 450 Gy. Patients with Grade 0 had a mean preimplant I-PSS score of 6.6 +/- 4.5 compared with 10.0 +/- 6.4 for Grades 1, 2 (p = 0.003). A significant increase in the incidence of incontinence was noted when the preimplant I-PSS was greater than 15. No relationship was noted between incontinence and prostate volume, total activity implanted, or the number of needles used (p = 0.83, p = 0.89, p = 0.36, respectively). CONCLUSION: Urethral D(10) dose and preimplant I-PSS are predictive for patients at higher risk of urinary incontinence. To decrease the risk of this complication, an effort should be made to keep the urethral D(10) dose as close to the prescribed dose as possible, and the preimplant I-PSS should be thoroughly evaluated in an attempt to select patients with scores less than 15.