LC‐MS/MS detection of unaltered glucuronoconjugated metabolites of metandienone

The aim of this study was to evaluate the direct detection of glucuronoconjugated metabolites of metandienone (MTD) and their detection times. Metabolites resistant to enzymatic hydrolysis were also evaluated. Based on the common mass spectrometric behaviour of steroid glucuronides, three liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS) strategies were applied for the detection of unpredicted and predicted metabolites: precursor ion scan (PI), neutral loss scan (NL), and theoretical selected reaction monitoring (SRM) methods. Samples from four excretion studies of MTD were analyzed for both the detection of metabolites and the establishment of their detection times. Using PI and NL methods, seven metabolites were observed in post‐administration samples. SRM methods allowed for the detection of 13 glucuronide metabolites. The detection times, measured by analysis with an SRM method, were between 1 and 22 days. The metabolite detected for the longest time was 18‐nor‐17β‐hydroxymethyl‐17α‐methyl‐5β‐androsta‐1,4,13‐triene‐3‐one‐17‐glucuronide. One metabolite was resistant to hydrolysis with β ‐glucuronidase; however it was only detected in urine up to four days after administration. The three glucuronide metabolites with the highest retrospectivity were identified by chemical synthesis or mass spectrometric data, and although they were previously reported, this is the first time that analytical data of the intact phase II metabolites are presented for some of them. The LC‐MS/MS strategies applied have demonstrated to be useful for detecting glucuronoconjugated metabolites of MTD, including glucuronides resistant to enzymatic hydrolysis which cannot be detected by conventional approaches. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Detection of stanozolol O‐ and N‐sulfate metabolites and their evaluation as additional markers in doping control

Stanozolol (STAN) is one of the most frequently detected anabolic androgenic steroids in sports drug testing. STAN misuse is commonly detected by monitoring metabolites excreted conjugated with glucuronic acid after enzymatic hydrolysis or using direct detection by liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS). It is well known that some of the previously described metabolites are the result of the formation of sulfate conjugates in C17, which are converted to their 17‐epimers in urine. Therefore, sulfation is an important phase II metabolic pathway of STAN that has not been comprehensively studied. The aim of this work was to evaluate the sulfate fraction of STAN metabolism by LC‐MS/MS to establish potential long‐term metabolites valuable for doping control purposes. STAN was administered to six healthy male volunteers involving oral or intramuscular administration and urine samples were collected up to 31 days after administration. Sulfation of the phase I metabolites commercially available as standards was performed in order to obtain MS data useful to develop analytical strategies (neutral loss scan, precursor ion scan and selected reaction monitoring acquisitions modes) to detect potential sulfate metabolites. Eleven sulfate metabolites (M‐I to M‐XI) were detected and characterized by LC‐MS/MS. This paper provides valuable data on the ionization and fragmentation of O‐ sulfates and N‐ sulfates. For STAN, results showed that sulfates do not improve the retrospectivity of the detection compared to the previously described long‐term metabolite (epistanozolol‐N ‐glucuronide). However, sulfate metabolites could be additional markers for the detection of STAN misuse. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Urinary detection of conjugated and unconjugated anabolic steroids by dilute‐and‐shoot liquid chromatography‐high resolution mass spectrometry

Anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) are an important class of doping agents. The metabolism of these substances is generally very extensive and includes phase‐I and phase‐II pathways. In this work, a comprehensive detection of these metabolites is described using a 2‐fold dilution of urine and subsequent analysis by liquid chromatography‐high resolution mass spectrometry (LC‐HRMS). The method was applied to study 32 different metabolites, excreted free or conjugated (glucuronide or sulfate), which permit the detection of misuse of at least 21 anabolic steroids. The method has been fully validated for 21 target compounds (8 glucuronide, 1 sulfate and 12 free steroids) and 18 out of 21 compounds had detection limits in the range of 1–10 ng mL^?1 in urine. For the conjugated compounds, for which no reference standards are available, metabolites were synthesized in vitro or excretion studies were investigated. The detection limits for these compounds ranged between 0.5 and 18 ng mL^?1 in urine. The simple and straightforward methodology complements the traditional methods based on hydrolysis, liquid‐liquid extraction, derivatization and analysis by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) and liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry (LC‐MS). Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

UHPLC‐MS/MS and UHPLC‐HRMS identification of zolpidem and zopiclone main urinary metabolites and method development for their toxicological determination

Zolpidem and zopiclone (Z‐compounds) are non‐benzodiazepine hypnotics of new generation that can be used in drug‐facilitated sexual assault (DFSA). Their determination in biological fluids, mainly urine, is of primary importance; nevertheless, although they are excreted almost entirely as metabolites, available methods deal mainly with the determination of the unmetabolized drug. This paper describes a method for the determination in urine of Z‐compounds and their metabolites by ultra‐high‐pressure liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC‐MS/MS) and UHPLC coupled with high resolution/high accuracy Orbitrap® mass spectrometry (UHPLC‐HRMS). The metabolic profile was studied on real samples collected from subjects in therapy with zolpidem or zopiclone; the main urinary metabolites were identified and their MS behaviour studied by MS/MS and HRMS. Two carboxy‐ and three hydroxy‐ metabolites, that could be also detected by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) as trimethylsylyl derivatives, have been identified for zolpidem. Also, at least one dihydroxilated metabolite was detected. As for zopiclone, the two main metabolites detected were N‐demethyl and N‐oxide zopiclone. For both substances, the unmetabolized compounds were excreted in low amounts in urine. In consideration of these data, a UHPLC‐MS/MS method for the determination of Z‐compounds and their main metabolites after isotopic dilution with deuterated analogues of zolpidem and zopiclone and direct injection of urine samples was set up. The proposed UHPLC‐MS/MS method appears to be practically applicable for the analysis of urine samples in analytical and forensic toxicology cases, as well as in cases of suspected DFSA. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Phase I metabolism of the highly potent synthetic cannabinoid MDMB‐CHMICA and detection in human urine samples

Among the recently emerged synthetic cannabinoids, MDMB‐CHMICA (methyl N ‐{[1‐(cyclohexylmethyl)‐1H ‐indol‐3‐yl]carbonyl}‐3‐methylvalinate) shows an extraordinarily high prevalence in intoxication cases, necessitating analytical methods capable of detecting drug uptake. In this study, the in vivo phase I metabolism of MDMB‐CHMICA was investigated using liquid chromatography‐electrospray ionization‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐ESI‐MS/MS) and liquid chromatography‐electrospray ionization‐quadrupole time‐of‐flight‐mass spectrometry (LC‐ESI‐Q ToF‐MS) techniques. The main metabolites are formed by hydrolysis of the methyl ester and oxidation of the cyclohexyl methyl side chain. One monohydroxylated metabolite, the ester hydrolysis product and two further hydroxylated metabolites of the ester hydrolysis product are suggested as suitable targets for a selective and sensitive detection in urine. All detected in vivo metabolites could be verified in vitro using a human liver microsome assay. Two of the postulated main metabolites were successfully included in a comprehensive LC‐ESI‐MS/MS screening method for synthetic cannabinoid metabolites. The screening of 5717 authentic urine samples resulted in 818 cases of confirmed MDMB‐CHMICA consumption (14%). Since the most common route of administration is smoking, smoke condensates were analyzed to identify relevant thermal degradation products. Pyrolytic cleavage of the methyl ester and amide bond led to degradation products which were also formed metabolically. This is particularly important in hair analysis, where detection of metabolites is commonly considered a proof of consumption. In addition, intrinsic activity of MDMB‐CHMICA at the CB₁ receptor was determined applying a cAMP accumulation assay and showed that the compound is a potent full agonist. Based on the collected data, an enhanced interpretation of analytical findings in urine and hair is facilitated. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Elucidation of the metabolites of the novel psychoactive substance 4‐methyl‐N‐ethyl‐cathinone (4‐MEC) in human urine and pooled liver microsomes by GC‐MS and LC‐HR‐MS/MS techniques and of its detectability by GC‐MS or LC‐MSn standard screening approaches

4‐methyl‐N‐ethcathinone (4‐MEC), the N‐ethyl homologue of mephedrone, is a novel psychoactive substance of the beta‐keto amphetamine (cathinone) group. The aim of the present work was to study the phase I and phase II metabolism of 4‐MEC in human urine as well as in pooled human liver microsome (pHLM) incubations. The urine samples were worked up with and without enzymatic cleavage, the pHLM incubations by simple deproteinization. The metabolites were separated and identified by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) and liquid chromatography‐high resolution‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐HR‐MS/MS). Based on the metabolites identified in urine and/or pHLM, the following metabolic pathways could be proposed: reduction of the keto group, N‐deethylation, hydroxylation of the 4‐methyl group followed by further oxidation to the corresponding 4‐carboxy metabolite, and combinations of these steps. Glucuronidation could only be observed for the hydroxy metabolite. These pathways were similar to those described for the N‐methyl homologue mephedrone and other related drugs. In pHLM, all phase I metabolites with the exception of the N‐deethyl‐dihydro isomers and the 4‐carboxy‐dihydro metabolite could be confirmed. Glucuronides could not be formed under the applied conditions. Although the taken dose was not clear, an intake of 4‐MEC should be detectable in urine by the GC‐MS and LC‐MSⁿ standard urine screening approaches at least after overdose. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Detection of the recently emerged synthetic cannabinoid 4F‐MDMB‐BINACA in “legal high” products and human urine specimens

Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) remain one of the largest groups of new psychoactive substances (NPS) on the European drug market. Although the number of new derivatives occurring on the market has dropped in the last two years, newly emerging NPS still represent a challenge for laboratories performing forensic drug analysis in biological matrices. The newly emerged SC 4F‐MDMB‐BINACA has been reported by several law enforcement agencies in Europe and the USA since November 2018. This work aimed at revealing urinary markers to prove uptake of 4F‐MDMB‐BINACA and differentiate from the use of structurally similar SCs. Phase‐I metabolites detected in human urine specimens were confirmed by phase‐I metabolites generated in vitro using a pooled human liver microsomes (pHLM) assay. Seized materials and test‐purchased “legal high” products were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography?quadrupole‐time‐of‐flight?mass spectrometry (LC?qToF?MS). Human urine specimens and pHLM assay extracts were measured with liquid chromatography?electrospray ionization?tandem mass spectrometry (LC?ESI?MS/MS) and confirmed by LC?qToF?MS. In January 2019, the Institute of Legal Medicine in Erlangen (Germany) identified 4F‐MDMB‐BINACA in three herbal blends. During the same time period, the described SC was identified in a research chemical purchased online. Investigation of phase‐I metabolism led to the metabolites M10 (ester hydrolysis) and M11 (ester hydrolysis and dehydrogenation) as reliable urinary markers. Widespread distribution on the German drug market was proven by analysis of urine samples from abstinence control programs and by frequent detection of 4F‐MDMB‐BINACA in “herbal blends” and “‘research chemicals” purchased via the Internet.     

Direct and efficient liquid chromatographic‐tandem mass spectrometric method for opiates in urine drug testing – importance of 6‐acetylmorphine and reduction of analytes

Opiates comprise a class of abused drugs that is of primary interest in clinical and forensic urine drug testing. Determination of heroin, codeine, or a multi‐drug ingestion is complicated since both heroin and codeine can lead to urinary excretion of free and conjugated morphine. Liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS) offers advantage over gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry by simplifying sample preparation but increases the number of analytes. A method based on direct injection of five‐fold diluted urine for confirmation of morphine, morphine‐3‐glucuronide, morphine‐6‐glucuronide, codeine, codeine‐6‐glucuronide and 6‐acetylmorphine was validated using LC‐MS/MS in positive electrospray mode monitoring two transitions using selected reaction monitoring. The method was applied for the analysis of 3155 unknown urine samples which were positive for opiates in immunochemical screening. A linear response was observed for all compounds in the calibration curves covering more than three orders of magnitude. Cut off was set to 2 ng/ml for 6‐acetylmorphine and 150 ng/ml for the other analytes. 6‐Acetylmorphine was found to be effective (sensitivity 82%) in detecting samples as heroin intake. Morphine‐3‐glucuronide and codeine‐6‐glucuronide was the predominant components of total morphine and codeine, 84% and 93%, respectively. The authors have validated a robust LC‐MS/MS method for rapid qualitative and quantitative analysis of opiates in urine. 6‐Acetylmorphine has been demonstrated as a sensitive and important parameter for a heroin intake. A possible interpretation strategy to conclude the source of detected analytes was proposed. The method might be further developed by reducing the number of analytes to morphine‐3‐glucuronide, codeine‐6‐glucuronide and 6‐acetylmorphine without compromising test performance. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Study of the in vitro and in vivo metabolism of the tryptamine 5‐MeO‐MiPT using human liver microsomes and real case samples

The synthetic tryptamine 5‐methoxy‐N‐methyl‐N‐isopropyltryptamine (5‐MeO‐MiPT) has recently been abused as a hallucinogenic drug in Germany and Switzerland. This study presents a case of 5‐MeO‐MiPT intoxication and the structural elucidation of metabolites in pooled human liver microsomes (pHLM), blood, and urine. Microsomal incubation experiments were performed using pHLM to detect and identify in vitro metabolites. In August 2016, the police encountered a naked man, agitated and with aggressive behavior on the street. Blood and urine samples were taken at the hospital and his premises were searched. The obtained blood and urine samples were analyzed for in vivo metabolites of 5‐MeO‐MiPT using liquid chromatography–high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS/MS). The confiscated pills and powder samples were qualitatively analyzed using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), LC‐HRMS/MS, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). 5‐MeO‐MiPT was identified in 2 of the seized powder samples. General unknown screening detected cocaine, cocaethylene, methylphenidate, ritalinic acid, and 5‐MeO‐MiPT in urine. Seven different in vitro phase I metabolites of 5‐MeO‐MiPT were identified. In the forensic case samples, 4 phase I metabolites could be identified in blood and 7 in urine. The 5 most abundant metabolites were formed by demethylation and hydroxylation of the parent compound. 5‐MeO‐MiPT concentrations in the blood and urine sample were found to be 160 ng/mL and 3380 ng/mL, respectively. Based on the results of this study we recommend metabolites 5‐methoxy‐N‐isopropyltryptamine (5‐MeO‐NiPT), 5‐hydroxy‐N‐methyl‐N‐isopropyltryptamine (5‐OH‐MiPT), 5‐methoxy‐N‐methyl‐N‐isopropyltryptamine‐N‐oxide (5‐MeO‐MiPT‐N‐oxide), and hydroxy‐5‐methoxy‐N‐methyl‐N‐isopropyltryptamine (OH‐5‐MeO‐MiPT) as biomarkers for the development of new methods for the detection of 5‐MeO‐MiPT consumption, as they have been present in both blood and urine samples.     

Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry screening method using information‐dependent acquisition of enhanced product ion mass spectra for synthetic cannabinoids including metabolites in urine

The total number of synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) – a group of new psychoactive substances (NPS) – is increasing every year. The rapidly changing market demands the latest analytical methods to detect the consumption of SCs in clinical or forensic toxicology. In addition, SC metabolites must also be included in a screening procedure, if detection in urine is asked for. For that purpose, an easy and fast qualitative liquid chromatography—tandem mass spectrometry (LC?MS/MS) urine screening method for the detection of 75 SCs and their metabolites was developed and validated in terms of matrix effects, recovery, and limits of identification for a selection of analytes. SC metabolites were generated using in vitro human liver microsome assays, identified by liquid chromatography?high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC?HRMS/MS) and finally included to the MS/MS spectra in‐house library. Sample preparation was performed using a cheap‐and‐easy salting‐out liquid–liquid extraction (SALLE) after enzymatic hydrolysis. Method validation showed good selectivity, limits of identification down to 0.05 ng/mL, recoveries above 80%, and matrix effects within ±25% for the selected analytes. Applicability of the method was demonstrated by detection of SC metabolites in authentic urine samples.     

Metabolite profiling of guanfacine in plasma and urine of healthy Japanese subjects after oral administration of guanfacine extended‐release tablets

Guanfacine is used for the treatment of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS), metabolite profiling of guanfacine was performed in plasma and urine collected from healthy Japanese adults following repeated oral administration of guanfacine extended‐release formulation. Unchanged guanfacine was the most abundant component in both plasma and urine (from the MS signal intensity). In plasma, the M3 metabolite (a sulfate of hydroxy‐guanfacine) was the prominent metabolite; the M2 metabolite (a glucuronide of a metabolite formed by monooxidation of guanfacine), 3‐hydroxyguanfacine and several types of glucuronide at different positions on guanfacine were also detected. In urine, the M2 metabolite and 3‐hydroxyguanfacine were the principal metabolites. From metabolite analysis, the proposed main metabolic pathway of guanfacine is monooxidation on the dichlorobenzyl moiety, followed by glucuronidation or sulfation. A minor pathway is glucuronidation at different positions on guanfacine. As the prominent metabolites in plasma were glucuronide and sulfate of hydroxyguanfacine, which have no associated toxicity concerns, further toxicity studies of the metabolites, for example in animals, were not deemed necessary.     

Metabolism of the tryptamine‐derived new psychoactive substances 5‐MeO‐2‐Me‐DALT, 5‐MeO‐2‐Me‐ALCHT,and 5‐MeO‐2‐Me‐DIPT and their detectability in urine studied by GC–MS,LC–MSn,and LC‐HR‐MS/MS

Many N,N‐dialkylated tryptamines show psychoactive properties and were encountered as new psychoactive substances. The aims of the presented work were to study the phase I and II metabolism and the detectability in standard urine screening approaches (SUSA) of 5‐methoxy‐2‐methyl‐N,N‐diallyltryptamine (5‐MeO‐2‐Me‐DALT), 5‐methoxy‐2‐methyl‐N‐allyl‐N‐cyclohexyltryptamine (5‐MeO‐2‐Me‐ALCHT), and 5‐methoxy‐2‐methyl‐N,N‐diisopropyltryptamine (5‐MeO‐2‐Me‐DIPT) using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), liquid chromatography coupled with multistage accurate mass spectrometry (LC–MSⁿ), and liquid chromatography‐high‐resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐HR‐MS/MS). For metabolism studies, urine was collected over a 24 h period after administration of the compounds to male Wistar rats at 20 mg/kg body weight (BW). Phase I and II metabolites were identified after urine precipitation with acetonitrile by LC‐HR‐MS/MS. 5‐MeO‐2‐Me‐DALT (24 phase I and 12 phase II metabolites), 5‐MeO‐2‐Me‐ALCHT (24 phase I and 14 phase II metabolites), and 5‐MeO‐2‐Me‐DIPT (20 phase I and 11 phase II metabolites) were mainly metabolized by O‐demethylation, hydroxylation, N‐dealkylation, and combinations of them as well as by glucuronidation and sulfation of phase I metabolites. Incubations with mixtures of pooled human liver microsomes and cytosols (pHLM and pHLC) confirmed that the main metabolic reactions in humans and rats might be identical. Furthermore, initial CYP activity screenings revealed that CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 were involved in hydroxylation, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 in O‐demethylation, and CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 in N‐dealkylation. For SUSAs, GC–MS, LC‐MSⁿ, and LC‐HR‐MS/MS were applied to rat urine samples after 1 or 0.1 mg/kg BW doses, respectively. In contrast to the GC–MS SUSA, both LC–MS SUSAs were able to detect an intake of 5‐MeO‐2‐Me‐ALCHT and 5‐MeO‐2‐Me‐DIPT via their metabolites following 1 mg/kg BW administrations and 5‐MeO‐2‐Me‐DALT following 0.1 mg/kg BW dosage. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Determination of growth hormone releasing peptides metabolites in human urine after nasal administration of GHRP‐1, GHRP‐2, GHRP‐6, Hexarelin,and Ipamorelin

Growth hormone releasing peptides (GHRPs) stimulate secretion of endogenous growth hormone and are listed on the World Anti‐Doping Agency (WADA) Prohibited List. To develop an effective method for GHRPs anti‐doping control we have investigated metabolites of GHRP‐1, GHRP‐2, GHRP‐6, Hexarelin, and Ipamorelin in urine after nasal administration. Each compound was administrated to one volunteer. Samples were collected for 2 days after administration, processed by solid‐phase extraction on weak cation exchange cartridges and analyzed by means of nano‐liquid chromatography ‐ high resolution mass spectrometry. Six metabolites of GHRP‐1 were identified. GHRP‐1 in the parent form was not detected. GHRP‐1 (2‐4) free acid was detected in urine up to 27 h. GHRP‐2, GHRP‐2 free acid and GHRP‐2 (1‐3) free acid were detected in urine up to 47 h after administration. GHRP‐6 was mostly excreted unchanged and detected in urine 23 h after administration, its metabolites were detectable for 12 h only. Hexarelin and Ipamorelin metabolized intensively and were excreted as a set of parent compounds with metabolites. Hexarelin (1‐3) free acid and Ipamorelin (1‐4) free acid were detected in urine samples after complete withdrawal of parent substances. GHRPs and their most prominent metabolites were included into routine ultra‐pressure liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry procedure. The method was fully validated, calibration curves of targeted analytes were obtained and excretion curves of GHRPs and their metabolites were plotted. Our results confirm that the detection window after GHRPs administration depends on individual metabolism, drug preparation form and the way of administration. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

In vitro metabolism study of a black market product containing SARM LGD‐4033

Anabolic agents are often used by athletes to enhance their performance. However, use of steroids leads to considerable side effects. Non‐steroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) are a novel class of substances that have not been approved so far but seem to have a more favourable anabolic/androgenic ratio than steroids and produce fewer side effects. Therefore the use of SARMs has been prohibited since 2008 by the World Anti‐Doping Agency (WADA). Several of these SARMs have been detected on the black market. Metabolism studies are essential to identify the best urinary markers to ensure effective control of emerging substances by doping control laboratories. As black market products often contain non‐pharmaceutical‐grade substances, alternatives for human excretion studies are needed to elucidate the metabolism. A black market product labelled to contain the SARM LGD‐4033 was purchased over the Internet. Purity verification of the black market product led to the detection of LGD‐4033, without other contaminants. Human liver microsomes and S9 liver fractions were used to perform phase I and phase II (glucuronidation) metabolism studies. The samples of the in vitro metabolism studies were analyzed by gas chromatography‐(tandem) mass spectrometry (GC‐MS(/MS)), liquid chromatography‐high resolution‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐(HR)MS/MS). LC‐HRMS product ion scans allowed to identify typical fragment ions for the parent compound and to further determine metabolite structures. In total five metabolites were detected, all modified in the pyrrolidine ring of LGD‐4033. The metabolic modifications ranged from hydroxylation combined with keto‐formation (M1) or cleavage of the pyrrolidine ring (M2), hydroxylation and methylation (M3/M4) and dihydroxylation (M5). The parent compound and M2 were also detected as glucuronide‐conjugates. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Diphenidine,a new psychoactive substance: metabolic fate elucidated with rat urine and human liver preparations and detectability in urine using GC‐MS,LC‐MSn,and LC‐HR‐MSn

Diphenidine is a new psychoactive substance (NPS) sold as a ‘legal high’ since 2013. Case reports from Sweden and Japan demonstrate its current use and the necessity of applying analytical procedures in clinical and forensic toxicology. Therefore, the phase I and II metabolites of diphenidine should be identified and based on these results, the detectability using standard urine screening approaches (SUSAs) be elucidated. Urine samples were collected after administration of diphenidine to rats and analyzed using different sample workup procedures with gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) and liquid chromatography‐(high resolution)‐mass spectrometry (LC‐(HR)‐MS). With the same approaches incubates of diphenidine with pooled human liver microsomes (pHLM) and cytosol (pHLC) were analyzed. According to the identified metabolites, the following biotransformation steps were proposed in rats: mono‐ and bis‐hydroxylation at different positions, partly followed by dehydrogenation, N,N‐bis‐dealkylation, and combinations of them followed by glucuronidation and/or methylation of one of the bis‐hydroxy‐aryl groups. Mono‐ and bis‐hydroxylation followed by dehydrogenation could also be detected in pHLM or pHLC. Cytochrome‐P450 (CYP) isozymes CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, and CYP3A4 were all capable of forming the three initial metabolites, namely hydroxy‐aryl, hydroxy‐piperidine, and bis‐hydroxy‐piperidine. In incubations with CYP2D6 hydroxy‐aryl and hydroxy‐piperidine metabolites were detected. After application of a common users’ dose, diphenidine metabolites could be detected in rat urine by the authors’ GC‐MS as well as LC‐MSⁿ SUSA. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Development and validation of an LC‐MS/MS method after chiral derivatization for the simultaneous stereoselective determination of methylenedioxy‐methamphetamine (MDMA) and its phase I and II metabolites in human blood plasma

3,4‐Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) is a racemic drug of abuse and its two enantiomers are known to differ in their dose‐response curves. The S‐enantiomer was shown to be eliminated at a higher rate than the R‐enantiomer. The most likely explanation for this is a stereoselective metabolism also claimed in in vitro studies. Urinary excretion studies showed that the main metabolites in humans are 4‐hydroxy 3‐methoxymethamphetamine (HMMA) 4‐sulfate, HMMA 4‐glucuronide and 3,4‐dihydroxymethamphetamine (DHMA) 3‐sulfate. For stereoselective pharmacokinetic analysis of phase I and phase II metabolites in human blood plasma useful analytical methods are needed. Therefore the aim of the presented study was the development and validation of a stereoselective liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS) method for the simultaneous quantification of MDMA, 3,4‐methylenedioxyamphetamine, DHMA, DHMA 3‐sulfate, HMMA, HMMA 4‐glucuronide, HMMA 4‐sulfate, and 4‐hydroxy 3‐methoxyamphetamine in blood plasma for evaluation of the stereoselective pharmacokinetics in humans. Blood plasma samples were prepared by simple protein precipitation and afterwards all analytes were derivatized using N‐(2,4‐dinitro‐5‐fluorophenyl) L‐valinamide resulting in the formation of diastereomers which were easily separable on standard reverse phase stationary phases. This simple and fast method was validated according to international guidelines including specificity, recovery, matrix effects, accuracy and precision, stabilities, and limits of quantification. The method proved to be selective, sensitive, accurate and precise for all tested analytes except for DHMA. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Detection and phase I metabolism of the 7‐azaindole‐derived synthetic cannabinoid 5F‐AB‐P7AICA including a preliminary pharmacokinetic evaluation

In June 2018, a 'research chemica'l labeled 'AB‐FUB7AICA' was purchased online and analytically identified as 5F‐AB‐P7AICA, the 7‐azaindole analog of 5F‐AB‐PINACA. Here we present data on structural characterization, suitable urinary consumption markers, and preliminary pharmacokinetic data. Structure characterization was performed by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, infrared and Raman spectroscopy. Phase I metabolites were generated by applying a pooled human liver microsome assay (pHLM) to confirm the analysis results of authentic urine samples collected after oral self‐administration of 2.5 mg 5F‐AB‐P7AICA. Analyses of pHLM and urine samples were performed by liquid chromatography?time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). An LC–MS/MS method for the quantification of 5F‐AB‐P7AICA in serum was validated. Ten phase I metabolites were detected in human urine samples and confirmed in vitro. The main metabolites were formed by hydroxylation, amide hydrolysis, and hydrolytic defluorination, though – in contrast with most other synthetic cannabinoids – the parent compound showed the highest signals in most urine samples. The compound detection window was more than 45 hours in serum. The concentration‐time profile was best explained by a two‐phase pharmacokinetic model. 5F‐AB‐P7AICA was detected in urine samples until 65 hours post ingestion. Monitoring of metabolite M07, hydroxylated at the alkyl chain, next to parent 5F‐AB‐P7AICA, is recommended to confirm the uptake of 5F‐AB‐P7AICA in urinalysis. It seems plausible that the shift of the nitrogen atom from position 2 to 7 (e.g. 5F‐AB‐PINACA to 5F‐AB‐P7AICA) leads to a lower metabolic reactivity, which might be of general interest in medicinal chemistry.     

Lefetamine‐derived designer drugs N‐ethyl‐1,2‐diphenylethylamine (NEDPA) and N‐iso‐propyl‐1,2‐diphenylethylamine (NPDPA): Metabolism and detectability in rat urine using GC‐MS,LC‐MSn and LC‐HR‐MS/MS

N‐Ethyl‐1,2‐diphenylethylamine (NEDPA) and N‐iso‐propyl‐1,2‐diphenylethylamine (NPDPA) are two designer drugs, which were confiscated in Germany in 2008. Lefetamine (N,N‐dimethyl‐1,2‐diphenylethylamine, also named L‐SPA), the pharmaceutical lead of these designer drugs, is a controlled substance in many countries. The aim of the present work was to study the phase I and phase II metabolism of these drugs in rats and to check for their detectability in urine using the authors’ standard urine screening approaches (SUSA). For the elucidation of the metabolism, rat urine samples were worked up with and without enzymatic cleavage, separated and analyzed by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) and liquid chromatography‐high resolution‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐HR‐MS/MS). According to the identified metabolites, the following metabolic pathways for NEDPA and NPDPA could be proposed: N‐dealkylation, mono‐ and bis‐hydroxylation of the benzyl ring followed by methylation of one of the two hydroxy groups, combinations of these steps, hydroxylation of the phenyl ring after N‐dealkylation, glucuronidation and sulfation of all hydroxylated metabolites. Application of a 0.3 mg/kg BW dose of NEDPA or NPDPA, corresponding to a common lefetamine single dose, could be monitored in rat urine using the authors’ GC‐MS and LC‐MSⁿ SUSA. However, only the metabolites could be detected, namely N‐deethyl‐NEDPA, N‐deethyl‐hydroxy‐NEDPA, hydroxy‐NEDPA, and hydroxy‐methoxy‐NEDPA or N‐de‐iso‐propyl‐NPDPA, N‐de‐iso‐propyl‐hydroxy‐NPDPA, and hydroxy‐NPDPA. Assuming similar kinetics, an intake of these drugs should also be detectable in human urine. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Human urinary metabolic patterns of the designer benzodiazepines flubromazolam and pyrazolam studied by liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry

Over the past ~8 years, hundreds of unregulated new psychoactive substances (NPS) of various chemical categories have been introduced as recreational drugs through mainly open online trade. This study was performed to further investigate the human metabolic pattern of the NPS, or designer benzodiazepines flubromazolam and pyrazolam, and to propose analytical targets for urine drug testing of these substances. The urine samples originated from patient samples confirmed by liquid chromatography–high‐resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS/MS) analysis to contain flubromazolam or pyrazolam. The LC–HRMS/MS system consisted of a YMC‐UltraHT Hydrosphere C18 column (YMC, Dinslaken, Germany) coupled to a Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) Q Exactive Orbitrap MS operating in positive electrospray mode. The samples were analyzed both with and without enzymatic hydrolysis using β‐glucuronidase. Besides the parent compounds, the main urinary excretion products were parent glucuronides, mono‐hydroxy metabolites, and mono‐hydroxy glucuronides. In samples prepared without hydrolysis, the most common flubromazolam metabolites were 1 of the mono‐hydroxy glucuronides and 1 of the parent glucuronides. For pyrazolam, a parent glucuronide was the most common metabolite. These 3 metabolites were detected in all samples and were considered the primary targets for urine drug testing and confirmation of intake. After enzymatic hydrolysis of the urine samples, a 2–19‐fold increase in the concentration of flubromazolam was found, highlighting the value of hydrolysis for this analyte. With hydrolysis, the flubromazolam hydroxy metabolites should be used as target metabolites.     

Characterization and in vitro phase I microsomal metabolism of designer benzodiazepines: An update comprising flunitrazolam,norflurazepam, and 4'‐chlorodiazepam (Ro5–4864)

The number of newly appearing benzodiazepine derivatives on the new psychoactive substances (NPS) drug market has increased over the last couple of years totaling 23 ‘designer benzodiazepines’ monitored at the end of 2017 by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. In the present study, three benzodiazepines [flunitrazolam, norflurazepam, and 4′‐chlorodiazepam (Ro5–4864)] offered as ‘research chemicals' on the Internet were characterized and their main in vitro phase I metabolites tentatively identified after incubation with pooled human liver microsomes. For all compounds, the structural formula declared by the vendor was confirmed by gas chromatography?mass spectrometry (GC–MS), liquid chromatography?tandem mass spectrometry (LC MS/MS), liquid chromatography?quadrupole time of flight?mass spectrometry (LC?QTOF?MS) analysis and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The metabolic steps of flunitrazolam were monohydroxylation, dihydroxylation, and reduction of the nitro function. The detected in vitro phase I metabolites of norflurazepam were hydroxynorflurazepam and dihydroxynorflurazepam. 4’‐Chlorodiazepam biotransformation consisted of N‐dealkylation and hydroxylation. It has to be noted that 4′‐chlorodiazepam and its metabolites show almost identical LC–MS/MS fragmentation patterns to diclazepam and its metabolites (delorazepam, lormetazepam, and lorazepam), making a sufficient chromatographic separation inevitable. Sale of norflurazepam, the metabolite of the prescribed benzodiazepines flurazepam and fludiazepam, presents the risk of incorrect interpretation of analytical findings.