A cadaveric study of posterior dislocation after total hip replacement��effects of head diameter and acetabular anteversion

The size of the femoral head and acetabular anteversion are crucial for stability in total hip replacements. This study examined the effects of head diameter and acetabular anteversion on the posterior instability after total hip replacement in an in vivo setting. The acetabular shell was inserted at 0–20° of anteversion at five degree intervals. By using different head sizes (28 mm, 32 mm, 36 mm), the degrees of dislocation were recorded by computer navigation. The 36-mm group consistently showed better stability compared with the 32- and 28-mm groups, regardless of the degree of cup anteversion. Within each group of head size, the hip was significantly more stable when the cup anteversion increased from 0° to 10°. The difference became insignificant when it increased from 15° to 20°.     

Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject‐specific approach

Hip range of motion after total hip arthroplasty has been shown to be dependent on prosthetic design and component placement. We hypothesized that bony anatomy would significantly affect range of motion. Computer models of a current generation hip arthroplasty design were virtually implanted in a model of pelvis and femur in various orientations ranging from 35° to 55° cup abduction, 0° to 30° cup anteversion, and 0° to 30° femoral anteversion. Four head sizes ranging from 22.2 to 32 mm and two neck sizes ranging from 10‐mm and 12‐mm diameter were tested. Range of motion was recorded as maximum flexion–extension, abduction–adduction, and axial rotation of the femur before any contact between prosthetic components or bone was detected. Bony impingement preceded component impingement in about 44% of all conditions tested, ranging from 66% in adduction to 22% in extension. Range of motion increased as head size increased. However, increasing head size also increased the propensity for bony impingement, which tended to reduce the beneficial effect of increased head size on range of motion. Reducing neck diameter had a greater effect on prosthetic impingement (mean, 3.5° increase in range of motion) compared to bone impingement (mean, 1.9°). This model allowed for a clinically relevant assessment of range of motion after total hip arthroplasty and may also be used with patient‐specific geometry [such as that obtained from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans] for more accurate preoperative planning. © 2007 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 26:443–452, 2008     

Do large femoral heads reduce the risks of impingement in total hip arthroplasty with optimal and non-optimal cup positioning?

The purpose of this study was to assess whether large femoral heads (36–38 mm) improve the range of motion in total hip arthroplasty compared to standard (28–32 mm) femoral heads in the presence of optimal and non-optimal cup positioning. A mathematical model of the hip joint was generated by using a laser scan of a dried cadaveric hip. The range of motion was assessed with a cup inclination and anteversion of reference and with non-optimal cup positions. Large femoral heads increased the range of motion, compared to the 28-mm femoral head, in the presence of a hip prosthesis correctly implanted and even more so in the presence of non-optimal cup positioning. However, with respect to the 32-mm femoral head, large femoral heads showed limited benefits both in the presence of optimal and non-optimal cup positioning.     

Influence of Acetabular Shell Position and Component Design on Hip Dynamic Dislocation

Background

Dislocation is a major complication following total hip arthroplasty, with risk factors such as surgical technique, implant positioning, and implant design. Literature has suggested the distance the femoral head must travel before dislocation to be a predictive factor of dislocation where smaller travel distance has increased dislocation risk. The purpose of this study was to compare 3 designs (hemispherical, metal-on-metal, and dual mobility [DM]) in terms of the dynamic dislocation distance and force required to dislocate.

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Imageless Navigation With the Concept of Combined Anteversion

Background

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the implant positions and clinical results of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using an imageless navigation with the concept of combined anteversion.

Guidelines for Implant Placement to Minimize Impingement During Activities of Daily Living After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Impingement, both prosthetic and bony, precedes the vast majority of dislocations after total hip arthroplasty and may adversely impact component wear. Reconstructed computer hip models of 8 subjects were used to evaluate hip range of motion for activities of daily living (ADLs) associated with posterior instability and anterior instability. Variables examined included acetabular position, femoral offset, and head size. The majority of flexion ADLs (associated with posterior instability) encountered prosthetic impingement, whereas extension ADLs demonstrated bony impingement with the 45/20 cup placement position. Cup placement in natural anteversion and adduction allowed normal joint motion in anterior and posterior impinging activities. Insufficient femoral offset and smaller head size negatively impacted range of motion. Any anterior cup and posterior cup protrusions greater than 5 mm should be avoided.     

The 2014 Frank Stinchfield Award: The ‘Landing Zone’ for Wear and Stability in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Smaller Than We Thought: A Computational Analysis

Background

Positioning of total hip bearings involves tradeoffs, because cup orientations most favorable in terms of stability are not necessarily ideal in terms of reduction of contact stress and wear potential. Previous studies and models have not addressed these potentially competing considerations for optimal total hip arthroplasty (THA) function.

Questions/purposes

We therefore asked if component positioning in total hips could be addressed in terms of balancing bearing surface wear and stability. Specifically, we sought to identify acetabular component inclination and anteversion orientation, which simultaneously resulted in minimal wear while maximizing construct stability, for several permutations of femoral head diameter and femoral stem anteversion.

Methods

A validated metal-on-metal THA finite element (FE) model was used in this investigation. Five dislocation-prone motions as well as gait were considered as were permutations of femoral anteversion (0°–30°), femoral head diameter (32–48 mm), cup inclination (25°–75°), and cup anteversion (0°–50°), resulting in 4320 distinct FE simulations. A novel metric was developed to identify a range of favorable cup orientations (so-called “landing zone”) by considering both surface wear and component stability.

Results

When considering both wear and stability with equal weight, ideal cup position was more restrictive than the historically defined safe zone and was substantially more sensitive to cup anteversion than to inclination. Ideal acetabular positioning varied with both femoral head diameter and femoral version. In general, ideal cup inclination decreased with increased head diameter (approximately 0.5° per millimeter increase in head diameter). Additionally, ideal inclination increased with increased values of femoral anteversion (approximately 0.3° per degree increase in stem anteversion). Conversely, ideal cup anteversion increased with increased femoral head diameter (0.3° per millimeter increase) and decreased with increased femoral stem anteversion (approximately 0.3° per degree increase). Regressions demonstrated strong correlations between optimal cup inclination versus head diameter (Pearson’s r = −0.88), between optimal cup inclination versus femoral anteversion (r = 0.96), between optimal cup anteversion versus head diameter (r = 0.99), and between optimal cup anteversion and femoral anteversion (r = −0.98). For a 36-mm cup with a 20° anteverted stem, the ideal cup orientation was 46° ± 12° inclination and 15° ± 4° anteversion.

Conclusions

The range of cup orientations that maximized stability and minimized wear (so-called “landing zone”) was substantially smaller than historical guidelines and specifically did not increase with increased head size, challenging the presumption that larger heads are more forgiving. In particular, when the cup is oriented to improve not only stability, but also wear in the model, there was little or no added stability achieved by the use of larger femoral heads. Additionally, ideal cup positioning was more sensitive to cup anteversion than to inclination.

Clinical Relevance

Positioning THA bearings involves tradeoffs regarding stability and long-term bearing wear. Cup positions most favorable to minimization of wear such as low inclination and elevated anteversion were detrimental in terms of construct stability. Orientations were identified that best balanced the competing considerations of wear and stability.     

In vivo kinematics,component alignment and hardware variables influence on the liner-to-neck clearance during chair-rising after total hip arthroplasty

BackgroundThere is an interest in quantifying dynamic hip kinematics before and after total hip arthroplasty (THA) during chair-rising: one of daily life activities.MethodsThe study consisted of 21 patients who underwent unilateral total hip arthroplasty for symptomatic osteoarthritis. We obtained continuous radiographs using a flat-panel X-ray detector while the participants rose from chair. We assessed the pre and postoperative hip joint's movements using three-dimensional-to-two-dimensional model-to-image registration techniques. We also measured minimum liner-to-neck distances at maximum hip flexion and extension as anterior and posterior liner-to-neck distances, respectively. Multivariate analyses were applied to determine which factors were associated with liner-to-neck distances.ResultsThe cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem anteversion averaged 37.4°, 23.1°, and 30.1°, respectively. Significantly larger maximum hip flexion angle (72°) was found during chair-rising after THA compared to that before THA (63°, P < 0.01). The anterior pelvic tilt at the maximum hip flexion after THA (3° of anterior tilt) was significantly (P < 0.05) anterior compared to that before THA (1° of posterior tilt). The anterior and posterior liner-to-neck distances averaged 12.3 mm and 8.1 mm, respectively, with a significant difference (P < 0.01). No liner-to-neck contact was found in any hips. In multivariate analysis, the hip flexion angle, cup inclination, stem anteversion and head diameter were significantly associated with the anterior liner-to-neck distance (P < 0.05), the hip extension angle, cup anteversion, neck length and with or without elevated rim were significantly associated with the posterior liner-to-neck distance (P < 0.05, 0.01, 0.05, 0.01, respectively).ConclusionThis study indicates that well-positioned THA provide increased range of hip flexion with sufficient anterior liner-to-neck clearance during chair-rising. Dynamic hip kinematics, component position, and hardware variables significantly influenced on the liner-to-neck clearance under weight-bearing conditions.     

Hip Abduction Can Be Considered the Sole Posterior Precaution Strategy to Lower the Rate of Impingement After Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty With Large Femoral Head: A Computer Simulation Study

BackgroundStudies suggest that posterior hip precautions are unnecessary after total hip arthroplasty; however, many surgeons and patients choose to follow these precautions to some extent. In this study, we hypothesized that 20° of hip abduction would be sufficient to prevent impingement and dislocation in motions requiring hip flexion when using larger prosthetic heads (≥36 mm) when the acetabular implant is placed within a reasonable orientation (anteversion:15-25° and inclination: 40-60°).MethodsUsing a robotic hip platform, we investigated the effect of hip abduction on prosthetic and bony impingement in 43 patients. For the flexed seated position, anterior pelvic tilt angles of 10 and 20° were chosen, while anterior pelvic tilt angles of 70 and 90° were chosen for the bending forward position. An additional 10° of hip external rotation and 10 or 20° of hip internal rotation were also added to the simulation. One hip received a 32-mm head; otherwise, 36-, 40-mm, or dual-mobility heads were used. The study power was 0.99, and the effect size was 0.644.ResultsIn 65% of the cases, bone-bone impingement between the calcar and anterior-inferior iliac spine was the main type of impingement. The absolute risk of impingement decreased between 0 and 16.3% in both tested positions with the addition of 20° hip abduction.ConclusionWith modern primary total hip arthroplasty stems (low neck diameter) and an overall acceptable cup anteversion angle, small degrees of hip abduction may be the only posterior hip precaution strategy required to lower the risk of dislocation among patients. Future studies can potentially investigate the concept of personalized hip precautions based on preoperative computer simulations, utilized implants, hip-spine relations, and final implant orientation.     

The acetabulum: The elusive home run of THR

The objective is to describe the current factors for optimizing positioning of the acetabular component in THR. The emphasis in cup placement today is personalizing the component position for each patientʼs anatomy rather than a “one size fits all” (always put the cup in the same position such as 45° inclination and 15° anteversion). To individualize, the arthroplasty requires remembering the operation is on both sides of the joint (combined anteversion) and implanting the cup in the functional plane of that patient, which requires knowledge of the pelvic tilt at surgery and the changes in the spine−pelvic−hip construct between standing and sitting for that patient. To individualize, the cup position will demand higher precision than has been accepted in the past, such as computer navigation, to augment the experience and instinct of the surgeon in performing total hip replacement. In conclusion, acetabular cup placement is an elusive home run because the complexity of its positioning for each patient requires new preoperative planning, and more precise intraoperative positioning.     

Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not Associated with a Greater Incidence of Groin Pain in Comparison with Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing:A Retrospective Comparative Study

Background

Groin pain is a common long-term complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Femoral head size has been proposed as one of the primary causes. The implants used in dual mobility (DM) THA have large outer-bearing articulations, which could increase the risk of post-operative groin pain. Hip resurfacing (HR), too, has been shown to be associated with a risk of groin pain.

Questions/Purposes

The goals of this study were to compare the incidence of groin pain at 1 year after hip arthroplasty in patients with different femoral head diameters and in patients undergoing conventional THA, DM THA, and HR.

Methods

After combing an institutional registry for all patients who had undergone THA or HR for primary hip osteoarthritis, we included 3193 patients in the analysis; 2008 underwent conventional THA, 416 underwent DM THA, and 769 underwent HR. We used logistic regression modeling to analyze the relation of groin pain at 1 year after surgery to patient demographics and clinical characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), University of California at Los Angeles activity score at 1 year after surgery, bearing couple, and the ratio of acetabular diameter to femoral head diameter. We also measured cup inclination and anteversion in a subset of patients with and without groin pain at 1 year to assess whether pain could be related to implant position.

Results

Overall, 8.7% of patients reported groin pain at 1 year. Patients with groin pain were younger and had lower BMIs. There were increased odds of groin pain with a greater cup-to-head ratio, although DM implants, interestingly, were not significantly associated with groin pain; this may be attributable to so much of their movement taking place inside the implant. Subgroup analysis measuring cup inclination and anteversion showed no difference in cup position between patients with and without pain.

Conclusion

In this population of hip arthroplasty patients, the incidence of groin pain 1 year after surgery did not differ among patients undergoing DM and conventional THA; DM THA in particular was not associated with a higher risk of groin pain, despite its comparatively larger femoral head sizes. HR, on the other hand, was associated with a higher risk of pain. Appropriate implant sizing and bearing couple choice may optimize the functional benefit of THA.

     

Validation of a new method for determination of cup orientation in THA

Our goal was to validate accuracy, consistency, and reproducibility/reliability of a new method for determining cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This method allows matching the 3D‐model from CT images or slices with the projected pelvis on an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph using a fully automated registration procedure. Cup orientation (inclination and anteversion) is calculated relative to the anterior pelvic plane, corrected for individual malposition of the pelvis during radiograph acquisition. Measurements on blinded and randomized radiographs of 80 cadaver and 327 patient hips were investigated. The method showed a mean accuracy of 0.7 ± 1.7° (?3.7° to 4.0°) for inclination and 1.2 ± 2.4° (?5.3° to 5.6°) for anteversion in the cadaver trials and 1.7 ± 1.7° (?4.6° to 5.5°) for inclination and 0.9 ± 2.8° (?5.2° to 5.7°) for anteversion in the clinical data when compared to CT‐based measurements. No systematic errors in accuracy were detected with the Bland–Altman analysis. The software consistency and the reproducibility/reliability were very good. This software is an accurate, consistent, reliable, and reproducible method to measure cup orientation in THA using a sophisticated 2D/3D‐matching technique. Its robust and accurate matching algorithm can be expanded to statistical models. © 2009 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 27:1583–1588, 2009     

High friction moments in large hard‐on‐hard hip replacement bearings in conditions of poor lubrication

Disappointing clinical results for large diameter metal replacement bearings for the hip are related to compromised lubrication due to poor cup placement, which increases wear as well as friction moments. The latter can cause overload of the implant–bone interfaces and the taper junction between head and stem. We investigated the influence of lubrication conditions on friction moments in modern hip bearings. Friction moments for large diameter metal and ceramic bearings were measured in a hip simulator with cup angles varying from 0° to 60°. Two diameters were tested for each bearing material, and measurements were made in serum and in dry conditions, representing severely compromised lubrication. Moments were lower for the ceramic bearings than for the metal bearings in lubricated conditions, but approached those for metal bearings at high cup inclination. In dry conditions, friction moments increased twofold to 12 Nm for metal bearings. For ceramic bearings, the increase was more than fivefold to over 25 Nm. Although large diameter ceramic bearings demonstrate an improvement in friction characteristics in the lubricated condition, they could potentially replicate problems currently experienced due to high friction moments in metal bearings once lubrication is compromised. © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 31: 807–813, 2013     

Effect of acetabular cup position and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty.

Long-term clinical results of total hip arthroplasty for patients with developmental acetabular dysplasia of the hip have been reported, but placement of the femoral head center or cup orientation remains controversial, especially with a severe anterolateral shallow acetabulum or dislocated femoral head. Results of 41 Müller and 34 Harris Design 2 cemented total hip arthroplasties were evaluated for developmental dysplasia of the hip. The femoral head center and acetabular cup inclination angle were measured from the interteardrop line. Linear wear and wear direction were measured using the Livermore technique. The best position of the femoral head center was less than 35 mm vertically from the interteardrop line and 25 mm laterally from the teardrop. Femoral head center analysis showed that hips with the cup in a lateral and superior cup position all were revised, but a superior and medial position combined with a cup inclination angle less than 40 degrees did not require revision. Hips with a cup inclination angle more than 45 degrees had superior and lateral penetration patterns of the polyethylene. However, hips with an inclination angle less than 35 degrees and medial placement had medial head penetration patterns. With these all-polyethylene monolithic cemented cups, regardless of the femoral head diameter or cup thickness, better long-term results occurred with a cup inclination angle of 40 degrees or less and medial position of the cup.     

Imageless computer assistance to orientate the cup of total hip arthroplasties: a new system based on joint kinematics

Purpose of the study  Most imageless navigation systems for computer-assisted (CAS) total hip arthroplasty (THA) aim at orientating the cup with regard to the anterior pelvic plane (APP). However, these systems have some limitations: 1) the adequate position is not well defined to prevent impingement and dislocation; 2) dynamic variation of the APP according to activities (sitting, climbing stairs, etc.) are not integrated in determining the adequate orientation; 3) intraoperative assessment of the APP is not reliable with conventional tools, requiring ultrasound or two-stage identification. To address these issues, we developed an imageless CAS system without using APP, based on a kinematic approach of the hip joint. This system does not use the APP as the reference plane to orient the cup. The systemhelps the surgeon to orient the cup in relation to the cone describing the hip joint range of motion. The purpose of this study was to detail the technique and to analyze preliminary results. Materials and methods  Twenty-four primary cementless THAs were implanted using CAS Pleos™ with optoelectronic tracking system (18 women, 6 men; mean age, 67 ± 7.8 years, age range, 54–83 years) because of primary osteoarthritis. Two optoelectronic sensors are fixed percutaneously on the pelvis and the distal femur. The acetabulum is prepared first, followed by the femur using reamers and broaches of increasing size. The last broach placed in the femur was equipped with a large head adapted to the newly prepared acetabulum. The range of hip motion is recorded to determine the maximal range of motion cone. The acetabular cup is thus positioned so that the prosthesis range of motion totally covers the maximal range of motion of the hip joint. Results  The Postel-Merle-d’Aubigné score improved from 8.1 ± 3.2 (range, 3–13) preoperatively to 17.1 ± 0.8 (range, 16–18) at last follow-up. There were no complaints of patients about the sensor insertion and no cases of hematoma or fracture. Operative time was 35–40 min longer for the first four cases and was progressively reduced by 15–20 min for the last four cases. Mean leg length discrepancy was 5.6 ± 7.5 mm (range, 0–25 mm) before implantation and 0.6 ± 3 mm (range, −5 to 10 mm) at last follow-up, eighteen were equal. Mean frontal cup inclination was 47 ± 7° (range, 38–60°). After CT-scan measurement, mean anteversion of the femoral implant was 16.8 ± 9.2° (0–31°). The mean cup anteversion was 25.2 ± 9.2° (range, 8–40°) for “anatomical anteversion”. Only 10 of the 24 cups were orientated inside the Lewinnek safe zone (there was only one dislocation that was traumatic with a cup orientated in the safe zone). Conclusion  This method can be used in routine procedures without lengthening operative time significantly. It safely controls leg length and helps position the cup. This study demonstrates that there is no ideal position for the cup that can be used for all patients. Because of the wide range of inclination and anteversion figures, 58% of the cups were outside the safe zone recommended by Lewinnek.     

Visual intraoperative estimation of cup and stem position is not reliable in minimally invasive hip arthroplasty

Background and purpose — In hip arthroplasty, acetabular inclination and anteversion—and also femoral stem torsion—are generally assessed by eye intraoperatively. We assessed whether visual estimation of cup and stem position is reliable.

Patients and methods — In the course of a subgroup analysis of a prospective clinical trial, 65 patients underwent cementless hip arthroplasty using a minimally invasive anterolateral approach in lateral decubitus position. Altogether, 4 experienced surgeons assessed cup position intraoperatively according to the operative definition by Murray in the anterior pelvic plane and stem torsion in relation to the femoral condylar plane. Inclination, anteversion, and stem torsion were measured blind postoperatively on 3D-CT and compared to intraoperative results.

Results — The mean difference between the 3D-CT results and intraoperative estimations by eye was??4.9° (?18 to 8.7) for inclination, 9.7° (?16 to 41) for anteversion, and??7.3° (?34 to 15) for stem torsion. We found an overestimation of?>?5° for cup inclination in 32 hips, an overestimation of?>?5° for stem torsion in 40 hips, and an underestimation?

Interpretation — Even an experienced surgeon’s intraoperative estimation of cup and stem position by eye is not reliable compared to 3D-CT in minimally invasive THA. The use of mechanical insertion jigs, intraoperative fluoroscopy, or imageless navigation is recommended for correct implant insertion.     

Comparison of extracapsular pseudotumors seen in magnetic resonance imaging and in revision surgery of 167 failed metal-on-metal hip replacements

Background and purpose It is controversial whether the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) is a reliable guide for determining the cup orientation during total hip arthroplasty (THA). We investigated the variations in TAL anatomy and the TAL-guided cup orientation.

Methods 80 hips with osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia (OA) and 80 hips with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ON) were examined. We compared the anatomical anteversion of TAL and the TAL-guided cup orientation in relation to both disease and gender using 3D reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) images.

Results Mean TAL anteversion was 11° (SD 10, range –12 to 35). The OA group (least-square mean 16°, 95% confidence interval (CI): 14–18) had larger anteversion than the ON group (least-square mean 6.2°, CI: 3.8 – 7.5). Females (least-square mean 20°, CI: 17–23) had larger anteversion than males (least-square mean 7.0°, CI: 4.6–9.3) in the OA group, while there were no differences between the sexes in the ON group. When TAL was used for anteversion guidance with the radiographic cup inclination fixed at 40°, 39% of OA hips and 9% of ON hips had more than 10° variance from the target anteversion, which was 15°.

Interpretation In ON hips, TAL is a good guide for determining cup orientation during THA, although it is not a reliable guide in hips with OA secondary to dysplasia. This is because TAL orientation has large individual variation and is influenced by disease and gender.     

Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position

In a prospective and randomised clinical study, we implanted acetabular cups either by means of an image-free computer-navigation system (navigated group, n = 32) or by free-hand technique (freehand group n = 32, two drop-outs). Total hip replacement was conducted in the lateral position and through a minimally invasive anterior approach (MicroHip). The position of the component was determined postoperatively on CT scans of the pelvis using CT-planning software. We found an average inclination of 42.3° (range 32.7–50.6°; SD±3.8°) and an average anteversion of 24.5° (range 12.0–33.3°; SD±6.0°) in the computer-assisted study group and an average inclination of 37.9° (range 25.6–50.2°; SD±6.3°) and an average anteversion of 23.8° (range 5.6–46.9°; SD±10.1°) in the freehand group. The higher precision of computer navigation was indicated by the lower standard deviations. For both measurements we found a significant heterogeneity of variances (p < 0.05, Levene's test). The mean difference between the cup inclination/anteversion values displayed by computer navigation and the true cup position (CT control) was 0.37° (SD 3.26) and −5.61° (SD 6.48), respectively. We found a bias (underestimation) with regard to anteversion determined by the imageless computer navigation system. A bias for inclination was not found. Registration of the landmarks of the anterior pelvic plane in lateral position with undraped percutaneous methods leads to an error in cup anteversion, but not to an error in cup inclination. The bias we found is consistent with a correct registration of the anterosuperior iliac spine (ASIS) and with a registration of the symphysis 1 cm above the bone, corresponding to the less compressible overlying soft tissue in this region. There was no significant correlation between the bias and the thickness of soft tissue above the pubic tubercles. We suggest use of a percutaneous registration of ASIS and an invasive registration above the pubic tubercles when computer-assisted navigation is performed in minimally invasive THR in a lateral position.     

Asymptomatic prospective and retrospective cohorts with metal‐on‐metal hip arthroplasty indicate acquired lymphocyte reactivity varies with metal ion levels on a group basis

Some tissues from metal‐on‐metal (MoM) hip arthroplasty revisions have shown evidence of adaptive‐immune reactivity (i.e., excessive peri‐implant lymphocyte infiltration/activation). We hypothesized that, prior to symptoms, some people with MoM hip arthroplasty will develop quantifiable metal‐induced lymphocyte reactivity responses related to peripheral metal ion levels. We tested three cohorts (Group 1: n = 21 prospective longitudinal MoM hip arthroplasty; Group 2: n = 17 retrospective MoM hip arthroplasty; and Group 3: n = 20 controls without implants). We compared implant position, metal‐ion release, and immuno‐reactivity. MoM cohorts had elevated (p < 0.01) amounts of serum Co and Cr compared to controls as early as 3 months post‐op (Group 1:1.2 ppb Co, 1.5 ppb Cr; Group 2: 3.4 ppb Co, 5.4 ppb Cr; Group 3: 0.01 ppb Co, 0.1 ppb Cr). However, only after 1–4 years post‐op did 56% of Group 1 develop metal‐reactivity (vs. 5% pre‐op, metal‐LTT, SI > 2), compared with 76% of Group 2, and 15% of Group 3 controls (patch testing was a poor diagnostic indicator with only 1/21 Group 1 positive). Higher cup‐abduction angles (50° vs. 40°) in Group 1 were associated with higher serum Cr (p < 0.07). However, sub‐optimal cup‐anteversion angles (9° vs. 20°) had higher serum Co (p < 0.08). Serum Cr and Co were significantly elevated in reactive versus non‐reactive Group‐1 participants (p < 0.04). CD4+CD69+ T‐helper lymphocytes (but not CD8+) and IL‐1β, IL‐12, and IL‐6 cytokines were all significantly elevated in metal‐reactive versus non‐reactive Group 1 participants. Our results showed that lymphocyte reactivity to metals can develop within the first 1–4 years after MoM arthroplasty in asymptomatic patients and lags increases in metal ion levels. This increased metal reactivity was more prevalent in those individuals with extreme cup angles and higher amounts of circulating metal. © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 31: 173–182, 2013     

Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.

Impingement between femoral neck and endoprosthetic cup is one of the causes for dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Choosing a correct combined orientation of both components, the acetabular cup and femoral stem, in manual or computer-assisted implantation will yield a maximized, stable range of motion (ROM) and will reduce the risk for dislocation. A mathematical model of a THA was developed to determine the optimal combination of cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem antetorsion for maximizing ROM and minimizing the risk for cup-neck impingement. Single and combined hip joint motions were tested. A radiographic definition was used for component orientation. Additional parameters, such as stem-neck (CCD) angle, head-neck ratio, and the design of the acetabular opening, were also considered. The model showed that a maximized and safe ROM requires compliant, well-defined combinations of cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem antetorsion depending on the intended ROM. Radiographic cup anteversion and stem antetorsion were linearly correlated. Additional internal rotation reduced flexion, and additional external rotation reduced extension, abduction and adduction. The articulating hemispheric surface of acetabular cups should be oriented between 40 degrees and 45 degrees of radiographic inclination, between 20 degrees and 28 degrees of radiographic cup anteversion, and should be combined with stem antetorsion so that the sum of cup anteversion plus 0.7 times the stem antetorsion equals 37 degrees. Final component orientation must also consider cup containment, implant impingement with bone and soft tissue, and preoperative skeletal contractures or deformities to achieve the optimal compromise for each patient.