Bronchodilator effect of an inhaled combination therapy with salmeterol + fluticasone and formoterol + budesonide in patients with COPD

In the present trial, we compared the broncholytic efficacy of the combination therapy with 50 microg salmeterol + 250 microg fluticasone and 12 microg formoterol + 400 microg budesonide, both in a single inhaler device, in 16 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. The study was performed using a single-blind crossover randomized study. Lung function, pulse oximetry (SpO2) and heart rate were monitored before and 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 480, 600, and 720 min after bronchodilator inhalation. Both combinations were effective in reducing airflow obstruction. FEV1 AUC(0-12 h) was 2.83 l (95% CI: 2.13-3.54) after salmeterol/fluticasone and 2.57 l (95% CI: 1.97-3.2) after formoterol/budesonide. Formoterol/budesonide elicited the mean maximum improvement in FEV1 above baseline after 120 min (0.29 l; 95% CI: 0.21-0.37) and salmeterol/fluticasone after 300 min (0.32 l; 95% CI: 0.23-0.41). At 720 min, the increase in FEV1 over baseline values was 0.10 l (95% CI: 0.07-0.12) after salmeterol/fluticasone and 0.10 l (95% CI: 0.07-0.13) after formoterol/budesonide. The mean peak increase in heart rate occurred 300 min after formoterol/budesonide (1.5 b/min; 95% CI--2.3 to 5.3) and 360 min after salmeterol/fluticasone (2.6 b/min; 95% CI--1.9 to 7.0). SpO2 did not change. All differences between salmeterol/fluticasone and formoterol/budesonide were not significant (P > 0.05) except those in FEV1 at 120 and 360 min. The results indicate that an inhaled combination therapy with a long-acting beta2-agonist and an inhaled corticosteroid appears to be effective in improving airway limitation after acute administration in patients suffering from COPD.     

Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the effects of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists on pulmonary artery pressure in COPD patients

Increase in pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), which is common in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is a predictor of mortality independent of airflow limitation. beta-agonists might slightly attenuate this increase because they exert a vasodilating effect on pulmonary circulation when systematically administered. We have investigated the acute effects of salmeterol and formoterol on echocardiographic systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) in 20 patients with COPD and a sPAP greater than 20mmHg at rest. Acute haemodynamic responses to inhaled formoterol or salmeterol were assessed in all patients, in a randomized, double-blind double-dummy fashion. On two consecutive days, patients received, in a randomized order, formoterol 12microg via Turbuhaler plus placebo via Diskus or salmeterol 50microg via Diskus plus placebo via Turbuhaler. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography measurements of sPAP were made before and 15, 30, 60 and 180min after bronchodilator inhalation. Lung function, pulse oximetry and heart rate were also monitored at the same times. Mean sPAP significantly (p<0.05) decreased in comparison with baseline at 15, 30, and 60min post inhalation but returned towards control levels at 180min after both salmeterol and formoterol. There was no correlation between the maximum increase in FEV(1) and maximum decrease in sPAP either after inhalation of salmeterol (r(2)=0.071) or after that of formoterol (r(2)=0.0006). The increases in FEV(1) in comparison with baseline were always significant (p<0.05) from 15 to 180min post inhalation after either salmeterol or formoterol. Neither pulse oximetry nor heart rate changed in a significant manner (p>0.05). This study demonstrated that salmeterol and formoterol were equally beneficial for pulmonary haemodynamics in patients with COPD. A direct vasodilatation due to the activation of beta-adrenoceptors that are present in pulmonary vessels is a likely mechanism of their action in inducing the decrease in sPAP.     

Bronchodilator response to formoterol Turbuhaler in patients with COPD under regular treatment with formoterol Turbuhaler

Formoterol Turbuhaler has been suggested for as-needed use in asthmatic patients. We investigated whether regular treatment with formoterol would modify the dose-response curves to formoterol in patients with partially reversible COPD. In this randomised, double-blind, cross-over study taking place over four non-consecutive days 16 outpatients with moderate to severe COPD, who were under regular treatment with formoterol Turbuhaler (18 microg in two daily doses) from at least 4 months, inhaled a conventional dose of formoterol Turbuhaler 9 microg or placebo. Two hours later, a FEV(1) value was established, following which a dose-response curve to formoterol (4.5 microg/inhalation) or placebo was constructed using four inhalations (1+1+2)--total cumulative delivered dose of 18 microg formoterol--with the following sequences: (1) formoterol pre-treatment + formoterol 18 microg, (2) formoterol pre-treatment + placebo, (3) placebo pre-treatment + formoterol 18 microg, (4) placebo pre-treatment + placebo. Formoterol 9 microg induced significant (P < 0.0001) bronchodilation at 2 h after inhalation (best mean increase in FEV(1): 0.170 L). Afterwards, dose-dependent increases in FEV(1) occurred with formoterol (maximum mean increase from 2-h value with formoterol: 0.072 after formoterol pre-treatment, and 0.201 L after placebo pre-treatment). Both maximum values of bronchodilation after the last inhalation of formoterol were statistically different (P < 0.001) from 2-h levels. These results show that dose-dependent bronchodilatation of formoterol is maintained despite regular treatment.     

Long-term treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with salmeterol and the additive effect of ipratropium.

The efficacy and safety of salmeterol alone was compared with the combination of salmeterol plus ipratropium and with placebo during long-term treatment in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In addition, the single-dose effect in response to the first dose of treatment was studied over 12 h. The patients (n=144; age 64+/-7 yrs, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 44+/-11% pred) participated in a three-centre double-blind double-placebo parallel group study and were randomized after a run-in period of 2 weeks to receive either salmeterol 50 microg b.i.d., salmeterol 5 microg b.i.d. plus ipratropium 40 microg q.i.d. or placebo for a period of 12 weeks. The single-dose study demonstrated that salmeterol produced a significant increase in FEV1 (peak of 7% pred) and specific airway conductance (sGaw) (maximum of 60% baseline) for > or =12 h. The combination of salmeterol plus ipratropium elicited a greater bronchodilator response (11% and 94% increases respectively) than salmeterol alone during the first 6 h after inhalation. During treatment there were significant improvements in daytime symptom scores and morning peak expiratory flow in both the salmeterol and the salmeterol plus ipratropium groups (p<0.001), with an associated decrease in the use of rescue salbutamol. Improvements in FEV1 and sGaw were greater in the salmeterol plus ipratropium group than in the patients receiving only salmeterol. Thirty-five patients had an exacerbation; 11 (23%) in the salmeterol group (versus placebo NS), six (13%) in the salmeterol plus ipratropium group (versus placebo p<0.01) and 18 (36%) in the placebo group. In conclusion, in patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, long-term treatment with either salmeterol alone or salmeterol plus ipratropium is safe and effective. There was added benefit from the combination therapy in terms of improvement in airways obstruction, but not for improvement in symptom control or need for rescue salbutamol.     

Comparison of a combination of tiotropium plus formoterol to salmeterol plus fluticasone in moderate COPD

BACKGROUND: A 6-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in patients with COPD to compare lung function improvements of tiotropium, 18 microg qd, plus formoterol, 12 microg bid, to salmeterol, 50 microg bid, plus fluticasone, 500 microg bid. METHODS: Following a screening visit, subjects entered a run-in period in which they received regular ipratropium. At randomization, patients were assigned to either tiotropium plus formoterol or salmeterol plus fluticasone. After 6 weeks of treatment, a 12-h lung function profile was obtained. The coprimary end points were FEV(1) area under the curve for the time period 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) and peak FEV(1). RESULTS: A total of 729 patients were screened, and 605 patients were randomized and treated. A total of 592 patients (baseline FEV(1), 1.32 +/- 0.43 L/min [+/-SD]) were included in the analysis. After 6 weeks, the 12-h lung function profiles in the group receiving tiotropium plus formoterol were superior to those in the group receiving salmeterol plus fluticasone (mean difference in FEV(1) AUC(0-12), 78 mL [p = 0.0006]; mean difference in FVC AUC(0-12), 173 mL, p < 0.0001). Also, peak responses were in favor of tiotropium plus formoterol (difference in peak FEV(1), 103 mL [p < 0.0001]; difference in peak FVC, 214 mL [p < 0.0001]), as were FEV(1) and FVC at each individual time point after dose (p < 0.05). Predose FVC was significantly higher with the bronchodilator combination, while predose FEV(1) and rescue medication use did not differ significantly between groups. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Tiotropium plus formoterol was superior in lung function over the day compared to salmeterol plus fluticasone in patients with moderate COPD. Long-term studies in patients with severe COPD are warranted to assess the relative efficacy of different treatment combinations. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00239421.     

Formoterol Turbuhaler for as-needed therapy in patients with mild acute exacerbations of COPD.

Worsening of underlying bronchospasm may be associated with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). As airway obstruction becomes more severe, the therapeutic option is to add a short-acting inhaled beta2-agonist as needed to cause rapid relief of bronchospasm. Unfortunately however, the most effective dosage may increase above that recommended during acute exacerbations. Formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler has a rapid onset of action (within minutes) and demonstrates a maintained effect on a rway function. In this study, we examined the effects of formoterol used as needed in 20 patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. A dose response curve to inhaled formoterol (9 microg per inhalation) or placebo was constructed using three separate inhalations, i.e. a total cumulative dose of 27 microg. Dose increments were given at 20-min intervals, with measurements being made 15 min after each dose. Formoterol, but not placebo, induced a large and significant (P<0.001) dose-dependent increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) [mean differences from baseline = 0.1311 after 9 microg formoterol (95% CI: 0.096-0.167)] 0.1811 after 18 microg formoterol (95% CI: 0.140-0.2221) and 0.2081 after 27 microg formoterol (95% CI: 0.153-0.2631). However, 27 microg formoterol did not induce further benefit [0.0271 (95% CI: -0.008-0.0621); P=0.121] when compared wth 18 microg formoterol. Results of this study suggest the use of higher than customary dose of formoterol for as-needed therapy to provide rapid relief of bronchospasm in patients suffering from acute exacerbations of partially reversible COPD.     

Influence of higher than conventional doses of oxitropium bromide on formoterol-induced bronchodilation in COPD

We examined the influence of higher than conventional doses of oxitropium bromide on formoterol-induced bronchodilation in patients with partially reversible stable COPD. Twenty outpatients inhaled one or two puffs of formoterol (12 microg puff(-1)), or placebo. Two hours after inhalation, a dose-response curve to inhaled oxitropium bromide (100 microg puff(-1)) or placebo was constructed using one puff, one puff, two puffs and two puffs, for a total cumulative dose of 600 microg oxitropium bromide. Doses were given at 20-min intervals and measurements made 15 min after each dose. On six separate days, all patients received one of the following: (1) formoterol 12 microg + oxitropium bromide 600 microg, (2) formoterol 12 microg + placebo, (3) formoterol 24 microg + oxitropium bromide 600 microg, (4) formoterol 24 microg + placebo, (5) placebo + oxitropium bromide 600 microg, or (6) placebo + placebo. Both formoterol 12 microg and 24 microg induced a good bronchodilation (formoterol 12 microg, 0.19-0.20 l; formoterol 24 microg 0.22-0.24 l). The dose-response curve of oxitropium, but not placebo, showed an evident increase in FEV1, with a further significant increase of respectively 0.087 l and 0.082 l after the formoterol 12 microg and formoterol 24 microg pre-treatment. This study shows that improved pulmonary function in patients with stable COPD may be achieved by adding oxitropium 400-600 microg to formoterol. There is not much difference in bronchodilation between combining oxitropium with formoterol 12 microg or 24 microg. In any case, formoterol 24 microg alone seems sufficient to achieve the same bronchodilation induced by oxitropium 600 microg alone in most patients.     

Formoterol: a review of its use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Inhaled formoterol is a long-acting selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonist, with an onset of action of 5 minutes postdose and a bronchodilator effect that lasts for at least 12 hours. Statistically significant and clinically relevant (>120 ml) improvements in lung function [assessed using standardized/normalized area under the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) versus time curve (AUC FEV1)] were observed with inhaled formoterol 12 microg twice daily (the approved dosage in the US) compared with placebo in 12-week and 12-month, randomized, double-blind trials in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The bronchodilator efficacy of formoterol 12 microg twice daily was greater than that of oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages) in a 12-month trial or inhaled ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily in a 12-week trial. Improvement in AUC FEV1 with formoterol, but not theophylline, compared with placebo was observed in patients with irreversible or poorly-reversible airflow obstruction. Formoterol also significantly improved health-related quality of life compared with ipratropium bromide or placebo and significantly reduced symptoms compared with placebo. Combination therapy with formoterol 12 microg twice daily plus ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily was significantly more effective than albuterol (salbutamol) 200 microg four times daily plus the same dosage of ipratropium bromide in a 3-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial. Inhaled formoterol was well tolerated in clinical trials. The incidence of investigator-determined drug-related adverse events with inhaled formoterol 12 microg twice daily was similar to that with placebo and inhaled ipratropium bromide 40 microg four times daily but lower than that with oral slow-release theophylline (individualized dosages). Importantly, there were no significant differences between formoterol and placebo or comparator drugs in cardiovascular adverse events in patients with COPD and corrected QT interval values within the normal range. In conclusion, inhaled formoterol improved lung function and health-related quality of life and reduced symptoms relative to placebo in clinical trials in patients with COPD. The drug had greater bronchodilator efficacy than oral slow-release theophylline or inhaled ipratropium bromide and showed efficacy in combination with ipratropium bromide. The adverse events profile (including cardiovascular adverse events) with formoterol was similar to that with placebo. Thus, inhaled formoterol may be considered as a first-line option for the management of bronchoconstriction in patients with COPD who require regular bronchodilator therapy for the management of symptoms.     

Rapid onset of bronchodilation in COPD: a placebo-controlled study comparing formoterol (Foradil Aerolizer) with salbutamol (Ventodisk)

Formoterol fumarate is a beta2-agonist bronchodilator that combines a fast onset of action with a long duration of action. Its fast onset of action is well documented in asthma but has not been directly compared with that of salbutamol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the bronchodilatory effects over the first 3 h after inhalation of single doses of formoterol 24 microg delivered via the Aerolizer dry powder inhaler device (double-blind), or salbutamol 400 microg delivered by a Diskhaler dry powder inhaler (single-blind) in patients with COPD. A total of 24 patients with COPD were randomized [mean age 61.6 +/- 7.8 years, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) 1.38 +/- 0.32 l and 45.8 +/- 9.6% of predicted]. Inhalation of formoterol or salbutamol resulted in similar increases in FEV from 0 to 3 h post-dose. Both drugs produced similar bronchodilation by 5 min, which became almost maximal by 30 min. The primary efficacy variable, the area under the curve (AUC) of the FEV increase above predose baseline from 0 to 30 min (AUC(0-30 min)), demonstrated significant effects for formoterol (mean 5.89 +/- 4.67 l min(-1)), and salbutamol (mean 6.06 +/- 4.34 l min(-1)), which were not statistically different from each other but statistically significantly higher (P<0.0001) than that observed with placebo (-0.32 +/- 2.59 l min(-1)). In addition, both formoterol and salbutamol produced similar and rapid increases in forced vital capacity (FVC). In summary, this study confirms the rapid onset of action of formoterol and indicates that the onset of action of formoterol and salbutamol are similar in patients with COPD.     

Onset of action following formoterol Turbuhaler and salbutamol pMDI in reversible chronic airway obstruction

Short-acting beta(2)-agonists are currently recommended for symptom relief in asthma and the treatment of mild, acute exacerbations in COPD. However, formoterol has as fast an onset of action as salbutamol with the additional benefit of longer-lasting bronchodilation (approximately 12 h). Furthermore, systemic side effects observed with formoterol are of a similar duration but less pronounced than with short-acting beta(2)-agonists. In this double-blind, randomized, cross-over study, 20 adult patients with reversible chronic airway obstruction (intrinsic asthma or COPD) inhaled single doses of formoterol 9 microg or salbutamol 100 microg (group A) or formoterol 18 microg or salbutamol 200 microg (group B). FEV(1) was measured prior to and 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 min following inhalation of study drug. No significant differences in FEV(1) values were observed between group A (P=0.704) or group B (P=0.270) at baseline, or at 5 (Group A: P=0.340; Group B: P=0.559) and 15 min (Group A: P=0.526; Group B: P=0.818) post dose. No adverse events were reported during the study. Formoterol Turbuhaler has as rapid an onset of action as salbutamol pMDI when given at the recommended doses.     

Onset of action of formoterol/budesonide in single inhaler vs. formoterol in patients with COPD

Formoterol is a beta(2)-agonist bronchodilator that combines a fast onset of action with a long duration of broncholytic effect. An increasing documentation is showing that the combination of a long acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist bronchodilator and an inhaled corticosteroid targets the airways obstruction in patients with COPD. In this study, we have explored whether the acute addition of an inhaled corticosteroid influences the fast bronchodilator response to formoterol. A total of 20 patients with stable COPD were randomized. Single doses of formoterol/budesonide 2 x (4.5/160)microg or formoterol 2 x 4.5 microg were given via Turbuhaler. Serial measurements of FEV(1) were performed over 60 min. Formoterol/budesonide elicited a significantly larger mean FEV(1)-AUC(0-15 min) than formoterol alone. Also the change in FEV(1) 15 min after inhalation of formoterol/budesonide combination (0.197 l; 95% CI: to 0.142-0.252) was greater than that induced by formoterol alone (0.147 l; 95% CI: to 0.092-0.201). The mean increases in FEV(1) were always higher after budesonide/formoterol than formoterol alone, although both treatments induced a significant improvement over baseline at each explored time point. Even the FEV(1)-AUC(0-60 min) after formoterol/budesonide was significantly larger than that after formoterol. Both treatments induced a significant reduction in VAS score but did not modify heart rate in a statistically significant manner. This study indicates that the addition of budesonide influences the fast onset of action of formoterol, but does not induce systemic effects, in patients with stable COPD.     

Profiles of measured and perceived bronchodilation. A placebo-controlled cross-over trial comparing formoterol and salmeterol in moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Long-acting beta(2)-agonists have acquired an indispensable position in the management of bronchial symptoms in patients with asthma. The objective of this study was to compare onset-of-action and clinical effectiveness of formoterol and salmeterol during 2 weeks of treatment. We also investigated the association between bronchodilator effects and perceived relieve of dyspnoea. METHODS: A multi-centre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial was performed in 35 subjects with moderate persistent asthma. Treatment periods existed of 2 weeks formoterol (12 microg bid), salmeterol (50 microg bid) and placebo, all administered by pressurized metered dose inhaler. FEV(1) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were repeatedly measured until 180 min post-bronchodilation (post-BD), before as well as after each treatment period. Onset-of-action was defined as a >/=15% increase in FEV(1). Subjects kept diaries of morning and evening PEFR values and use of rescue bronchodilator. RESULTS: Formoterol and salmeterol both caused a significant increase in FEV(1) (0.45L [95% CI 0.01, 0.80] and 0.27L [95% CI 0.08, 0.62] respectively). At 3' post-BD, three times as many subjects demonstrated onset-of-action on formoterol compared to salmeterol (36% versus 13%, P = 0.063), at 6' post-BD 42% versus 27% (P = 0.063). VAS scores were similar for formoterol and salmeterol at pre-treatment assessment, but tended to be higher for formoterol after 2weeks treatment. No differences between formoterol and salmeterol were observed for PEFR values or use of rescue medication. 50% of the subjects preferred formoterol, 29% salmeterol (P < 0.001). Significant associations between FEV(1) and VAS ratings existed only at 10', 15' and 30' post-BD, not before or after these time points. CONCLUSION: The earlier described faster onset-of-action of formoterol as compared to a equipotent dosage of salmeterol was confirmed in this study. Perception of decreasing airflow obstruction may be delayed after acute bronchodilation.     

Formoterol mono- and combination therapy with tiotropium in patients with COPD: a 6-month study

Although guidelines recommend combining long-acting bronchodilators in COPD, data are limited. We examined the clinical efficacy and safety of formoterol, tiotropium and the combination in patients with COPD. Eight hundred and forty-seven patients with COPD (mean FEV(1) 52% predicted; FEV(1)/FVC 53%) were randomized to receive one of the following four treatments for 24 weeks: formoterol 10 microg b.i.d. plus tiotropium 18 microg o.d.; formoterol 10 microg b.i.d.; tiotropium 18 microg o.d., or placebo. The study was partially blinded (formoterol and placebo). For the primary endpoint, FEV(1) 2h post-dose after 24 weeks, there were small differences in favour of the combination therapy versus formoterol (0.07 L, p=0.044) or tiotropium (0.06 L, p=0.066). All three treatments were superior to placebo (p<0.001). The combination was statistically superior to monotherapy for: the primary endpoint (p=0.044 vs. formoterol); FEV(1) 5 min after the first dose (p<0.001) and at 12 weeks (p<0.05 vs. tiotropium); and peak expiratory flow averaged over the first 6 weeks (p<0.001 vs. both). The three active treatments were significantly more effective than placebo for secondary endpoints: COPD-related 'bad days', symptoms, use of rescue medication and peak expiratory flow, and aspects of health-related quality of life. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar with all active treatments, although COPD-related adverse events were more common with tiotropium. Combined bronchodilator therapy may be a valuable treatment option for patients with COPD.     

Comparable spirometric efficacy of tiotropium compared with salmeterol plus fluticasone in patients with COPD: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend the long-acting anticholinergic, tiotropium, or long-acting beta 2-agonists as maintenance therapy in patients with moderate-to-very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The efficacy of long-acting beta(2)-agonists combined with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the treatment of COPD has also been confirmed for severe and very severe COPD, but data comparing tiotropium with the combination of a long-acting beta 2-agonist and an ICS are lacking. METHODS: This 6-week multicentre, randomised, double-blind, triple-dummy pilot study compared the bronchodilator effects of tiotropium 18 microg once daily (n=56) vs. the combination of salmeterol 50 microg plus fluticasone 250 microg twice daily (n=51) in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. Serial spirometry was performed over 12h after 6 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 to 12h (AUC0-12h) on Day 43. RESULTS: Randomization failed to provide treatment groups with comparable baseline characteristics for smoking history, current smokers, duration of COPD, FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC) and reversibility. Mean+/-SD FEV1 was 1.31+/-0.47 l in the tiotropium group vs. 1.46+/-0.53 l in the salmeterol plus fluticasone group. Fewer patients in the tiotropium showed a 12% and 200 ml acute increase to short-acting bronchodilators at baseline. However, treatment with tiotropium alone resulted in comparable bronchodilation compared with salmeterol plus fluticasone, as measured by all the spirometric parameters at the end of the 6-week study period. FEV1 AUC0-12h was 1.55+/-0.03 l in the tiotropium group vs. 1.57+/-0.04 l in the salmeterol plus fluticasone groups (p=0.63). Trough (predose) FEV1 was 1.54+/-0.03 l in the tiotropium group vs. 1.46+/-0.03 l in the combination group (p=0.07), and peak FEV(1) was 1.68+/-0.04 l vs. 1.66+/-0.04 l, respectively, (p=0.77). FVC AUC0-12h, trough and peak were also comparable between groups at study end (p>0.05, for all). Further, rescue salbutamol use was similar in the tiotropium and combination groups and both treatment regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Six weeks of treatment with tiotropium resulted in comparable bronchodilation compared with salmeterol plus fluticasone in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD, despite tiotropium patients having lower lung function and fewer patients considered reversible at baseline. The results of this pilot study will aid planning for further large-scale comparative studies.     

Changes in specific airway resistance after powder inhalation of formoterol or salmeterol in moderate bronchial asthma

Formoterol and salmeterol are two long acting beta 2 agonists available for the treatment of asthma which show differences in onset of action. In a multicentre parallel group study, patients with moderate asthma were investigated by measuring the specific airway resistance (sRaw), a more sensitive parameter than FEV1. A total of 99 patients were randomised for open treatment with either 12 micrograms formoterol delivered via Turbohaler or 50 micrograms salmeterol via Diskus. The patients were between 18 and 66 years of age, had a medium FEV1 of 68.8% (+/- 17.8%) predicted and showed a medium reversibility of 28.8% (+/- 16.5%). The patients response to one inhalation of the study drug was investigated by sRaw measurements 2, 5, 10, 20 and 60 minutes after inhalation of the formulation. Additionally, FEV1 was measured. The results show a significant decrease in specific airway resistance of 29% within the first two minutes in patients who had received 12 micrograms formoterol via Turbohaler. However, patients on salmeterol showed no change (sRaw +/- 1%). This difference is statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, in 49% of the patients treated with salmeterol an increase in sRaw was seen immediately after inhalation of the drug. This increase was +16.4% in an average of 2 minutes after inhalation. One hour after inhalation the differences between the groups were small and not significant neither between formoterol and salmeterol-treated patients nor within the salmeterol group. In the following week patients were treated with 12 micrograms formoterol Turbohaler b.i.d. or 50 micrograms salmeterol Diskus b.i.d., respectively. A further sRaw measurement was performed 11 +/- 1 hours after the last inhalation of the drug. The results for sRaw and FEV1 show no differences between both study drugs indicating a similar duration of action for both formoterol Turbohaler and Salmeterol Diskus in moderate asthma. No serious adverse events were reported. The adverse event profile observed in both study groups was comparable. Thus, this study shows once again that formoterol delivered via Turbohaler has a more rapid onset of bronchodilating action compared with salmeterol Diskus. Furthermore the inhalation of salmeterol via Diskus in one-half of the patients led to an increase in specific airway resistance within the first minutes after inhalation. It is worth discussing whether an unspecific reaction to the relatively large lactose particles which are components of the salmeterol Diskus formulation are responsible for this observation.     

Onset and duration of action of formoterol and tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe COPD

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management guidelines recommend regular treatment with one or more long-acting bronchodilators for patients with moderate to severe COPD. OBJECTIVE: To compare the onset and duration of action of formoterol and tiotropium in patients with COPD. METHODS: This randomized, multicentre, open-label crossover study in 38 patients with COPD (mean age 64 years; mean FEV(1) 55% predicted) assessed the effect of 7 days of treatment with formoterol (12 microg b.i.d. via Foradil Aerolizer) vs. tiotropium (18 microg o.d. via Spiriva HandiHaler) on lung function measured over a period of 12 h after the first dose on day 1 and the last dose on day 8. RESULTS: The primary efficacy variable, FEV(1)-AUC during the first 2 h post-dose (FEV(1)-AUC(10-120 min)), was significantly higher for formoterol compared with tiotropium, with between-treatment differences of 124 ml (p = 0.016) after the first dose and 80 ml (p = 0.036) after 7 days' treatment in favour of formoterol. FEV(1) measured 12 h after inhalation did not differ statistically significantly between treatments. Adverse events occurred in 2 (5%) patients after treatment with formoterol and in 5 (12%) patients after treatment with tiotropium. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates faster onset of action and greater bronchodilation of formoterol vs. tiotropium for bronchodilation within the first 2 h of inhalation (FEV(1)-AUC(10-120 min)) and comparable bronchodilation 12 h post-inhalation in patients with moderate to severe COPD.     

Relief of dyspnoea by beta2-agonists after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction

Virtually all asthma patients use brorichodilators. Formoterol and salbutamol have a rapid onset of bronchodilating effect, whereas salmeterol acts slower. We studied the onset of improvement of dyspnoea sensation after inhalation with these bronchodilators and placebo to reverse a methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction as a model for an acute asthma attack. Seventeen patients with asthma completed this randomised, double-blind, crossover, double-dummy study. On 4 test days, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and Borg score were recorded and patients were challenged with methacholine until FEV1 fell with > or = 30% of baseline value. Thereafter, formoterol 12 microg via Turbuhaler, salbutamol 50 microg via Turbuhaler, salmeterol 50 microg via Diskhaler, or placebo was inhaled. FEV1 and Borg scores were assessed during the following 60 min. The first sensed improvement of Borg score was significantly (P<0.05) faster achieved with formoterol (geometric mean (Gmean) (range) 1.5 (1-40) min) and salbutamol 1.8 (1-10) min than with salmeterol 4.5 (1-30) min and placebo 3.4 (1-40) min. The Borg score returned significantly faster to the baseline value with formoterol, salbutamol, and salmeterol (Gmean time 13.8 (1-75), 13.4 (1-60), and 18.0 (1-75) min, respectively) than with placebo (33.6 (1-75 min). Formoterol and salbutamol act significantly faster than salmeterol in relieving dyspnoea induced by methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction, in patients with asthma.     

The 24 h duration of bronchodilator action of the salmeterol/fluticasone combination inhaler

INTRODUCTION: The duration of bronchodilator action of the long-acting beta agonist salmeterol when administered in the evening has not been investigated. In this study we have investigated whether a single evening dose of salmeterol, administered from the combination salmeterol/fluticasone (SFC) Accuhaler significantly attenuates the circadian rhythm in airway tone over 24 h. METHODS: Eighteen subjects with mild to moderate asthma (mean FEV1 84% predicted) participated in a double-blind, double dummy, placebo controlled, cross-over study. Subjects inhaled, in random order, placebo, salbutamol (200 microg) or SFC (50/100 microg) administered in the evening (2000 h) on three separate occasions. Lung function measurements including FEV1, specific airways conductance (sGaw) and maximum expiratory flow at 25-75% of vital capacity (MEF(25-75%)) were assessed at baseline, at 1 h and subsequently every 4 h post-dose for 24 h. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, SFC significantly improved the three measures of airways function throughout the 24 h period, with a difference in FEV1 at 24 h of 0.24 l (0.00-0.47 l). SFC abolished the biphasic pattern of the circadian rhythm in airway tone. In contrast, salbutamol had a significant bronchodilator action of 4-8 h, depending on the lung function parameter measured. CONCLUSION: The single evening administration of SFC via the Accuhaler resulted in a duration of bronchodilation of at least 24 h, with the abolition of the accentuated biphasic circadian variation in airway tone observed in asthma.     

Actions other than smooth muscle relaxation may play a role in the protective effects of formoterol on the allergen-induced late asthmatic reaction

Long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists attenuate the allergen-induced late asthmatic reaction. We evaluated whether other mechanisms in addition to airway smooth muscle relaxation may be implicated in this protective effect. The effects of formoterol (Foradil Aerolizer(TM), 24 microg dry powder) on the late asthmatic reaction were assessed by a randomised crossover factorial study in 24 patients with asthma. Four challenge/treatment combinations were tested: (A) saline/placebo, (B) saline/formoterol, (C) allergen/placebo, (D) allergen/formoterol. Formoterol and placebo were administered double blind after the last inhalation of the allergen or saline. FEV(1) was measured up to 32 h. The bronchodilator effect of formoterol was estimated as (B-A) and the overall protective effect as (D-C). The effect not due to bronchodilation was estimated as [(D-C)-(B-A)]/2. The bronchodilator effect of formoterol was statistically significant up to 5h (all P< or =0.015). Formoterol significantly attenuated the late asthmatic reaction between 3 and 32 h after allergen inhalation (all P< or =0.0012). The difference between this protective effect and the bronchodilator effect was statistically significant at 5 h and between 7 and 28 h after allergen inhalation (all P< or =0.035). Our results suggest that functional antagonism may not be the sole mechanism by which formoterol attenuates the allergen-induced late asthmatic reaction.     

Profiling the bronchodilator effects of the novel ultra-long-acting β2-agonist indacaterol against established treatments in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Indacaterol is a novel, inhaled, ultra-long-acting β(2)-agonist providing 24-h bronchodilation with once-daily (od) dosing for maintenance use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This article reviews the bronchodilator properties of indacaterol compared with other treatments used in COPD. Data from five published placebo-controlled studies were reviewed. Two 14-day crossover studies, the first comparing indacaterol 300 μg od with salmeterol 50 μg twice daily (bid), the second comparing indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg od with tiotropium 18 μg od, assessed forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) at 24 h postdose (trough). Third, a 14-day crossover study evaluated trough FEV(1) following indacaterol 300?μg dosed morning or evening compared with salmeterol 50 μg bid. Fourth, a single-dose study of indacaterol 150 and 300 μg measured FEV(1) at 5 min postdose compared with salmeterol/fluticasone 50/500 μg and salbutamol 200 μg. Finally, data from a 1-year study with indacaterol 300 μg and formoterol 12 μg bid were examined to determine whether bronchodilation was maintained long term. In the first two studies, indacaterol increased trough FEV(1) after 14 days by a statistically significant and clinically relevant margin over placebo; indacaterol had a greater effect than salmeterol and a similar effect to tiotropium. In the third study, indacaterol had the same effect on trough FEV(1) whether dosed in the morning or evening. In the fourth study, the onset of the bronchodilator effect of indacaterol was similar to that of salbutamol. In the fifth study, the bronchodilator effect of indacaterol on trough FEV(1) was maintained at a significant and clinically relevant level over 52 weeks, whereas the bronchodilator effect of formoterol diminished over time. To conclude, indacaterol is a highly effective bronchodilator that is superior to or at least as effective as other available long-acting bronchodilators for COPD.