Effects of Conditioned Stimulus Fear-Relevance and Preexposure on Expectancy and Electrodermal Measures of Human Pavlovian Conditioning

The present research investigated the effects of fear-relevance of the conditioned stimulus (CS) and CS preexposure on human electrodermal conditioning and on a continuous measure of expectancy of the unconditioned stimulus (US). Both experiments employed 20 preexposure, 8 acquisition, and 8 extinction trials in a differential Pavlovian conditioning paradigm with shock as the US. In Experiment 1 (N = 48), electrodermal conditioning was retarded by CS preexposure, but was not influenced by fear-relevance of the CS. Expectancy of the US was retarded by preexposure only in the fear-relevant condition. In Experiment 2 (N = 48), the CS/US contingencies was embedded in a visual masking task. Preexposure retarded both electrodermal conditioning and US expectancy. Neither measure was influenced by fear-relevance of the CS. However, fewer subjects in the preexposure condition learned the CS/US relationship and those who did, did so on later trial than those in the no-preexposure condition. Thus, the results indicated clear retardation of conditioning as a result of preexposure, but no reliable effect of fear-relevance.     

Cardiovascular and Electrodermal Responses Conditioned to Fear-Relevant Stimuli

This study examined heart rate, finger pulse volume, and skin conductance responses in subjects conditioned to fear-relevant (snakes and spiders) and fear-irrelevant (flowers and mushrooms) slide stimuli by an electric shock unconditioned stimulus. A differential conditioning paradigm with an interstimulus interval of 8 sec was used. There were 4 habituation, 8 acquisition, and 20 extinction trials with each of the two cues. The results demonstrated reliable acquisition for finger pulse volume and skin conductance responses, with superior resistance to extinction for the fear-relevant conditioned stimuli. The heart rate data showed no differentiation between reinforced and nonreinforced cues during acquisition and extinction, and no effect of fear-relevance. This discrepancy between skin conductance and finger pulse volume responses, on the one hand, and heart rate, on the other, was interpreted as due to differences in innervation, with the former measures mainly reflecting sympathetic and the latter parasympathetic effects.     

Effects of Stimulus Content on Second-Order Electrodermal Conditioning in Humans

Two experiments investigated human second-order conditioning with electrodermal activity as the dependent variable. In Experiment 1 (N = 144), Group PP received first-order pairings of CS1 and a white noise US of 100dB. In phase 2, Croup PP received pairings of CS2 and CS1, Group PR received first-order pairings of CS1, and the US during phase 1, and random presentations of CS: and CS, during phase 2. Group RP received random presentatiuns of CS2, and the US during phase 1, and pairings of CS: and CS, during phase 2. Within each of Groups PP, PR. and RP. the CSs were pictures of snakes and spiders, beetles and lizards, or flowers and mushrooms. All CS durations were 5 s, the US duration was 1 s, and the interstimulus interval was 5 s. First-order conditioning was clearly established in Groups PP and PR. and in phase 2. second-order conditioning was evident in Group PP. However, neither first-order nor second-order conditioning was affected, in either acquisition or extinction, by fear-relevance of the CS. Experiment 2 (N- 72) employed only groups who received stimulus pairings in both phases, and crossed fear-relevance of the CSs (fear-relevant vs. fear-irrelevant) with three US conditions (shock after work-up, noise after work-up, and noise of lOOdB). Second-order responding during extinction was greater in the fear-relevant condition than in the fear-irrelevant condition regardless of the type of US employed. The results are discussed in terms of the preparedness theory of the acquisition of phobias.     

Fear conditioning, preparedness, and the contingent negative variation

Psychophysiological research on preparedness has previously focused on autonomic nervous system parameters. The present study used electrocortical indices of fear conditioning. Subjects (n= 10) were tested under fear-relevant and fear-irrelevant conditions (1 week apart, order of conditions counterbalanced). Each condition comprised acquisition and extinction sessions. The contingent negative variation (CNV) was elicited in anticipation of forewarned slides (fear relevant: small animals; fear irrelevant: landscapes). In acquisition, reinforced conditioned stimulus (CS+) (but not nonreinforced conditioned stimulus [CS-]) slides were followed by white noise as an unconditioned stimulus (UCS). In extinction, the UCS was omitted. In the fear-relevant condition, CNV amplitude was significantly larger for CS+ than CS- in both acquisition and extinction. In the fear-irrelevant condition, CNV differentiation between CS+ and CS- was weak in both sessions. CNV was significantly larger in the fear-relevant than in the fear-irrelevant condition, for CS+ but not CS-. The findings are consistent with a preparedness interpretation and suggest that CNV under such circumstances may represent an automatic affective response to fear-relevant stimuli. Electrocortical measures could be particularly useful in examining information processing mechanisms in phobia and cognition-affect relationships generally.     

“Prepared” fear or socio-cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns,snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm

Across three experiments, we investigated whether electrodermal responses conditioned to ontogenetic fear-relevant (pointed guns) and phylogenetic fear-relevant stimuli (snakes and spiders) would resist instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm. Instructed extinction involves informing participants before extinction that the unconditional stimulus (US) will no longer be presented. This manipulation has been shown to abolish fear conditioned to fear-irrelevant conditional stimuli, but is said to leave fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders intact. The latter finding, however, has only been demonstrated when fear-relevance is manipulated between-groups. It is also not known whether instructed extinction affects fear conditioned to ontogenetic fear-relevant stimuli, such as pointed guns. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that fear conditioned to images of pointed guns does not resist instructed extinction. In Experiment 2, we detected some evidence to suggest that fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders survives instructed extinction but this evidence was not conclusive. In Experiment 3, we directly compared the effects of instructed extinction on fear conditioned to snakes and spiders and to guns and provide strong evidence that fear conditioned to both classes of stimuli is reduced after instructed extinction with no differences between ontogenetic and phylogenetic stimuli. The current results suggest that when fear relevance is manipulated within-participants fear conditioned to both phylogenetic and ontogenetic, fear-relevant stimuli responds to instructed extinction providing evidence in favor of a socio-cultural explanation for “preparedness” effects.     

Nonconscious associative learning: Pavlovian conditioning of skin conductance responses to masked fear-relevant facial stimuli

We examined the possibility of nonconscious associative learning in a context of skin conductance conditioning, using emotional facial expressions as stimuli. In the first experiment, subjects were conditioned to a backwardly masked angry face that was followed by electric shock, with a masked happy face as the nonreinforced stimulus. In spite of the effectively masked conditioned stimuli, differential conditioned skin conductance responses were observed in a subsequent nonmasked extinction phase. This effect could not be attributed to differential sensitization or pseudo-conditioning. In the second experiment, the differential responding during extinction was replicated with angry but not with happy faces as conditioned stimuli. It was concluded that with fear-relevant facial expressions as the conditioned stimulus, associative learning was possible even in conditions where the subjects remained unaware of the conditioned stimulus and its relationship to the unconditioned stimulus.     

Effects of fear-relevance on electrodermal safety signal learning

Safety signal learning in human subjects was investigated using a conditioned inhibition procedure with a shock unconditioned stimulus (US). The conditioned stimulus (CS) duration, and thus the CS-US interval, varied randomly from 20 to 50 s. Conditioning was assessed by change in tonic skin conductance level (SCL). Experiment 1 demonstrated reliable learning of a conditioned inhibition (A+/AB-) discrimination, in terms of both self-reported shock expectancy and change in SCL, in subjects who were able to report correctly the stimulus contingency. There was, however, no evidence of transfer of inhibitory properties from the safety signal B to a separately trained excitor. Experiment 2 compared two groups in which the safety signal was either fear-relevant (picture of snake or spider) or fear-irrelevant (flower or mushroom). As in previous research, there was no effect of fear-relevance on safety-signal learning. The results are discussed in terms of preparedness theory and excitatory conditioning with fear-relevant stimuli.     

Effects of conditioned stimulus preexposure on human electrodermal conditioning

Two experiments investigated the effects of conditioned stimulus (CS) preexposure on Pavlovian differential conditioning and extinction of the skin conductance response. In both experiments, half the subjects were exposed to 20 presentations each of the CS+ and CS-, and the other half were exposed to control stimuli. CS duration was 8 sec. The unconditioned stimulus in Experiment 1 (N = 48) was a 1000 Hz tone of 80 dB which signalled a reaction time requirement, and in Experiment 2 (N = 48), it was a 1 sec burst of white noise at 105 dB. The results of Experiment 1 indicated that no-preexposure groups displayed more CS+/CS- differentiation than preexposure groups during acquisition and more resistance to extinction, at least for the first interval anticipatory response. In addition, the results of Experiment 2 indicated that no-preexposure groups displayed more differentiation than preexposure groups in terms of the second interval anticipatory response. These data constitute a demonstration of the latent inhibition effect with human subjects, and imply that there is an intrinsic relationship between the orienting response and the conditioning process.     

Learning to fear suffocation: a new paradigm for interoceptive fear conditioning

The present study aimed to establish a new interoceptive fear conditioning paradigm. The conditioned stimulus (CS) was a flow resistor that slightly obstructs breathing; the unconditional stimulus (US) was a breathing occlusion. The paired group (N = 21) received 6 acquisition trials with paired CS–US presentations. The unpaired group (N = 19) received 6 trials of unpaired CS–US presentations. In the extinction phase, both groups were administered 6 CS‐only trials. Measurements included startle eyeblink response, electrodermal responses, and self‐reported US expectancy. In the paired group, startle blink responses were larger during CS compared to intertrial interval during acquisition and extinction. Electrodermal and US expectancies were larger for the paired than for the unpaired group during acquisition, but not during extinction. The present paradigm successfully established interoceptive fear conditioning with panic‐relevant stimuli.     

Backward masking and skin conductance responses after conditioning to nonfeared but fear-relevant stimuli in fearful subjects

The present study examined two issues. Are skin conductance responses conditioned to fear-relevant stimuli, as contrasted with responses conditioned to fear-irrelevant stimuli, elicited after merely an automatic, nonconscious analysis of the stimulus content? Do fearful subjects show better conditioning to nonfeared but fear-relevant stimuli (e.g., conditioning to spiders in snake-fearing subjects) than do nonfearful subjects? Subjects afraid of snakes, but not of spiders, or vice versa (n= 32) and nonfearful subjects (n= 32) were shown either fear-relevant stimuli (snakes or spiders and rats) or fear-irrelevant stimuli (flowers and mushrooms) in a differential conditioning paradigm, where one of the stimuli was followed by an electric shock. During a subsequent extinction phase, the conditioned stimuli were presented under backward masking conditions, preventing their conscious recognition. Consistent with our hypothesis, during the masked extinction of the conditioned stimuli, differential skin conductance responses to conditioning and control stimuli remained only for subjects conditioned to fear-relevant stimuli. Both fearful and nonfearful control subjects had significantly larger differential electrodermal responses to fear-relevant than to fear-irrelevant stimuli. However, contrary to our hypothesis, fearful subjects did not show enhanced conditionability to their nonfeared but fear-relevant stimuli as compared with nonfearful control subjects.     

Hemispheric Asymmetry in Conditioning to Facial Emotional Expressions

In the present experiment, we report a right hemisphere advantage for autonomic conditioning to facial emotional expressions. Specifically, angry, but not happy, facial expressions showed significantly more resistance to extinction when presented initially to the right as compared to the left hemisphere. Slides of happy and angry faces were used as conditioned stimuli (CS+ and CS-) with shock as the unconditioned stimulus (UCS). Half of the subjects (n = 15) had the angry face as CS+ (and the happy face as CS-), the other half had the happy face as CS+ (and the angry face as CS-). During acquisition, the CSs were presented foveally. During extinction, using the Visual Half-Field (VHF) technique, half of the CS+ and CS- trials were randomly presented in the right visual half-field (initially to the left hemisphere), and half of the trials were presented in the left half-field (initially to the right hemisphere). Stimuli were presented for 210 ms during acquisition, and for 30 ms during extinction. Bilateral skin conductance responses (SCRs) were recorded. The results showed effects of acquisition only for the angry CS+ group. During extinction, there was a significant Conditioning X Half-field interaction which was due to greater SCRs to the CS+ angry face when it was presented in the left half-field. It is concluded that the present results reveal hemisphere asymmetry effects in facial emotional conditioning.     

Orienting and Defensive Responding in the Electrodermal System: Palmar-Dorsal Differences and Recovery Rate during Conditioning to Potentially Phobic Stimuli

It was suggested that the effects of fear-relevant pictures as conditioned stimuli (CSs) for electrodermal responses may be explained if it is assumed that they produce conditioned defense responses (DRs), as opposed to the orienting responses (ORs) that are produced by fear-irrelevant stimuli. Some propositions in Edelberg's theory of electrodermal activity were used to differentiate between DRs and ORs in a test of this hypothesis. Groups of subjects were conditioned to fear-relevant (snakes and spiders) or fear-irrelevant (flowers and mushrooms) CSs by means of an aversive (electric shock) or a non-aversive (imperative signal for a reaction time (RT) task) unconditioned stimulus in long interval differential paradigms. The neutral-shock, phobic-RT, and neutral-RT groups showed no palmar-dorsal differences either in magnitude, probability or amplitude, and no conditioning in the recovery rate measure. However, the phobic-shock group showed a peak of dorsal magnitude early in training that subsequently habituated whereas the palmar magnitude data indicated a gradual conditioning effect that lasted throughout the 20 extinction trials. In addition, it showed slower recovery to the reinforced than to the nonreinforced stimulus. These data are taken as support for the hypothesis.     

Direction of changes in the cardiac component in a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm with variations in CS- and UCS-contents

The research reported was aimed at examining the direction of heart rate post-stimulus changes in a conditioning paradigm with fear-relevant (snakes and spiders), and fear-irrelevant (circles and triangles) slide-CSs. Furthermore, half of the subjects in each group had electric shocks as the UCS, whereas the other two halves were merely threatened about the shock. Finally, all subjects were informed at the start of the extinction about the removal of the UCS. Thus, a 2 X 2 factorial design was used. The conditioning situation involved a differential paradigm with an interstimulus interval of 8 sec. There were 12 presentations of each cue during acquisition, and 20 during extinction. The results showed reliable effects of decelerative acquisition in the fear-relevant shock group, and the fear-irrelevant threat group. During extinction, only the fear-relevant shock group showed evidence of continuing differential responding, with larger deceleration to the CS+. It is speculated that responses to fear-relevant CSs, together with shock-UCSs, share important similarities with the irrational aspect of phobic behavior, since the instructions about the omission of the UCS during extinction did not eliminate the responses to the CS+ in the fear-relevant shock group.     

Skin Conductance Conditioning to Potentially Phobic Stimuli as a Function of Interstimulus Interval and Delay Versus Trace Paradigm

Because prepared learning has been defined in terms of response acquisition in spite of degraded input, it was expected that differences in resistance to extinction between skin conductance responses conditioned to potentially phobic and neutral stimuli would increase with increased interstimulus interval (ISI) and be larger with a trace than with a delay conditioning paradigm. Twelve groups with 10 subjects each were observed in a differential conditioning experiment manipulating ISI (2, 8, or 16 sec), paradigm (delay versus trace), and fear-relevance of the conditioned stimulus (potentially phobic versus neutral). The results showed highly reliable resistance to extinction of first-interval anticipatory responses to phobic stimuli, and no resistance to extinction of the corresponding responses to the neutral stimuli. This difference did not interact either with the ISI or the paradigm factor. Thus, although underscoring the reliability of the difference in conditioning to potentially phobic and neutral stimuli, the results did not support the specific hypothesis of conditioning to phobic stimuli as being less dependent on the ISI parameters than conditioning to neutral stimuli.     

The Preparedness Theory of Phobias: The Effects of Initial Fear Level on Safety-Signal Conditioning to Fear-Relevant Stimuli

The preparedness theory of phobias implies that fear-relevant stimuli are biologically contrapre-pared for safety-signal conditioning. Thus it should be very difficult to establish a pictorial snake as a safety-signal predicting the absence of shock in a Pavlovian conditioned inhibition paradigm. Since this contrapreparedness is postulated as species-wide, the snake stimulus should be an ineffective safety-signal even in those subjects who do not fear snakes. In contrast, the prior fear hypothesis suggests that this difficulty should occur only in those subjects who already fear snakes. To test these hypotheses, subjects reporting either high or low snake fear were exposed to electrodermal conditioning trials designed to establish a fear-relevant CS (a pictorial snake) and a fear-irrelevant CS (a pictorial flower) as safety-signals by nonreinforcing each in compound with a fear-eliciting CS. The results provided marginal support for the prior fear hypothesis.     

Left hemisphere advantage for classical conditioning to auditory verbal CSs: Effects of nonattended extinction

The effects of brain laterality, or hemispheric asymmetry, on electrodermal classical conditioning during both attended and nonattended stimulus conditions were studied. Participants were conditioned to consonant-vowel (CV) syllables during an acquisition, or learning, phase of the experiment. During a subsequent extinction phase, the conditioned stimuli (CS) were presented in a dichotic mode of presentation. Half of the participants attended to the left car (right hemisphere) during the extinction phase and the other half of the participants attended to the right ear (left hemisphere). The results showed effects of conditioning for all participants during the acquisition phase. During dichotic extinction, the left hemisphere group showed remaining learning effects in both the attended and nonattended conditions, whereas the right hemisphere group demonstrated conditioning only in the attended condition.     

Effects of differential cue availability in an active avoidance CS for young and adult rats

In Experiment I, groups of 22- and 140+ -day-old rats were trained in acquisition and extinction of 1-way avoidance with a CS that consisted of the opening of a guillotine door 5 sec before US onset or a combination of door-opening plus a tonal signal that remained on until the occurrence of the motor response. Under both CS conditions, avoidance acquisition was similar at each age level. The extinction data indicated comparable performance for the young subjects but differential performance and greater resistance to extinction for the adult subjects. Adults trained with the door-opening CS persisted in responding for an entire series of 100 extinction trials, whereas the adults trained with the compound CS extinguished well within the 100-trial limit. A 2nd experiment included 10 pre-exposures of the simple or compound CS's prior to avoidance training. Although the pups were insensitive to pre-exposure effects, the adults that were pre-exposed and trained with identical CS'5 showed evidence of pre-exposure effects. Results of both experiments were interpreted as indicative of differential cue saliency between ages.     

Hemispheric Asymmetry and Human Electrodermal Conditioning: The Dichotic Extinction Paradigm

It was hypothesized that classically conditioned responses to an auditory verbal CS initially presented only to the left cerebral hemisphere would be greater than when the same CS was presented to the right hemisphere. The experiment consisted of three different phases in a dichotic extinction paradigm. During the habituation phase the CS+ and CS? were presented binaurally, and separated. All subjects were treated alike. During the acquisition phase the conditioning subjects had the CS+ but not the CS? followed by the UCS. The CS+ and CS? were presented binaurally and separated. The control subjects received no UCS presentations. During the dichotic extinction phase, half of the conditioned subjects had the CS+ presented in the right ear (i.e., with initial left hemisphere input), with the CS? simultaneously presented in the left ear (i.e., with initial right hemisphere input). The other half had the earphones reversed. The control group was similar to the two conditioning groups. During the acquisition phase, significantly larger electrodermal responses were observed to the CS+ compared to the CS? in the conditioning groups, but not in the control group. During the dichotic extinction phase, significantly more resistance to extinction was observed in the CS+ Right-Ear group compared to the CS+ Left-Ear group, with the control group revealing virtually no responding at all. It was concluded that the present results have demonstrated effects of cerebral asymmetry on rate of extinction of the classically conditioned response.     

Greater Resistance to Extinction of Electrodermal Responses Conditioned to Potentially Phobic CSs: A Noncognitive Process?

Previous results have suggested that electrodermal responses classically conditioned to potentially phobic CSs (e.g., pictures of snakes or spiders) are highly resistant to extinction and occur largely independently of cognitive expectancies. In order to test stringently for these possibilities, 144 college student subjects were administered differential classical conditioning acquisition and extinction paradigms while expectancies of the shock UCS were closely monitored. Half the subjects had potentially phobic CSs, whereas the other half had neutral CSs. Regardless of type of CS, during acquisition no evidence of electrodermal conditioning was found among subjects unaware of the CS?UCS contingency, nor was conditioning found on the pre-aware trials of subjects who became aware. During extinction, there was significantly greater resistance to extinction of electrodermal responses conditioned to potentially phobic CSs as well as a similar trend with expectancies of the UCS. However, when expectancies were equated, there was no greater resistance to extinction of electrodermal responses conditioned to potentially phobic CSs. Thus, while electrodermal responses conditioned to potentially phobic CSs did exhibit greater resistance to extinction, this conditioning was no more independent of expectancies than is conditioning with neutral CSs.     

Fear but not awareness predicts enhanced sensory processing in fear conditioning

It is not clear whether enhanced cortical processing of reinforced stimuli as reported by neuroimaging studies is due to expectancy of an aversive event alone or to activation of the fear system. The present study investigated cortical and autonomic responses of aware participants using an instructed fear conditioning design. Steady-state visual evoked fields (ssVEF) and heart rate change were recorded to assess sensory processing and activation of the fear system by reinforced (CS+) and nonreinforced stimuli (CS-). Participants who showed heart rate acceleration demonstrated increased ssVEFs in visual and parietal cortex during CS+ in acquisition trials. Heart rate decelerators did not show enhanced cortical activation with respect to the CS+. Participants in both groups reported awareness of CS-US contingencies. Awareness of stimulus contingency in fear conditioning seems not to be sufficient to elicit enhanced visual cortical processing.