Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole compared with ciprofloxacin for treatment and prophylaxis of Isospora belli and Cyclospora cayetanensis infection in HIV-infected patients. A randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In developing countries, Isospora belli and Cyclospora cayetanensis frequently cause chronic diarrhea in HIV-infected patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare 1 week of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment and 1 week of ciprofloxacin treatment in HIV-infected patients with chronic diarrhea caused by I. belli and C. cayetanensis. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: HIV clinic in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. PATIENTS: 42 HIV-infected patients with chronic diarrhea due to I. belli (n = 22) or C cayetanensis (n = 20). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (160 mg or 800 mg) or ciprofloxacin (500 mg) twice daily for 7 days. Patients who responded clinically and microbiologically received prophylaxis for 10 weeks (1 tablet orally, three times per week). MEASUREMENTS: Treatment success was measured by cessation of diarrhea and negative stool examination at day 7. Prophylaxis success was measured by recurrent disease rate. RESULTS: Diarrhea ceased in all 19 patients treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Eighteen of 19 patients had negative results on stool examination at day 7 (95%). Among the 23 patients who received ciprofloxacin, diarrhea ceased in 20 (87% [CI; 66% to 97%]) and 16 had negative results on stool examination at day 7 (70%). By survival analysis, diarrhea from isosporiasis and cyclosporiasis ceased more rapidly with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole than with ciprofloxacin. All patients receiving secondary prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole remained disease-free, and 15 of 16 patients receiving secondary prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin remained disease-free. CONCLUSIONS: A 1-week course of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is effective in HIV-infected patients with cyclosporiasis or isosporiasis. Although ciprofloxacin is not as effective, it is acceptable for patients who cannot tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.     

Treatment of travelers' diarrhea: ciprofloxacin plus loperamide compared with ciprofloxacin alone. A placebo-controlled, randomized trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of loperamide used in combination with ciprofloxacin or ciprofloxacin alone for the treatment of travelers' diarrhea. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: United States Army hospital in Egypt. PARTICIPANTS: United States military personnel with travelers' diarrhea (n = 104) during a military exercise in November 1989. Persons who were noncompliant, had bloody diarrhea, or had received antidiarrheal medications before entry into the study were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: All participants with travelers' diarrhea were treated with ciprofloxacin, 500 mg twice daily for 3 days. Fifty of these patients were randomly assigned to receive loperamide, a 4-mg first dose and 2 mg for every loose stool (as much as 16 mg/d), and 54 were randomly assigned to receive placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli was isolated from 57% of patients; Shigella and Salmonella, seen in 4% and 2% of patients, respectively, were not common. MAIN RESULTS: After 24 hours, the symptoms of 82% of patients in the ciprofloxacin and loperamide group compared with 67% in the ciprofloxacin and placebo group had improved or fully recovered (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.8 to 6.3; P = 0.08). After 48 hours, the symptoms of 90% of both groups had improved or fully recovered. The mean number of stools for those receiving loperamide was not much lower than those who did not receive loperamide after 24 hours (1.9 +/- 0.2 [SE] compared with 2.6 +/- 0.2) or 48 hours (3.1 +/- 0.3 compared with 4.0 +/- 0.3) of treatment (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: In a region where enterotoxigenic E. coli was the predominant cause of travelers' diarrhea, loperamide combined with ciprofloxacin was not better than treatment with ciprofloxacin alone. Loperamide appeared to have some benefit in the first 24 hours of treatment in patients infected with enterotoxigenic E. coli. Both regimens were safe.     

Clostridium tertium septicemia in patients with neutropenia

Eighteen adult patients with hematologic malignancy developed bacteremia due to Clostridium tertium while neutropenic. Fifteen had accompanying abdominal pain, colonic bleeding, or diarrhea, and three had perianal cellulitis. Fourteen recovered with antibiotic therapy alone; no patient was treated by surgery. C. tertium is an unusual Clostridium because it is resistant to many beta-lactam antibiotics and to metronidazole but is susceptible to vancomycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and ciprofloxacin. It is possible that use of third-generation cephalosporins (cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, ceftazidime) for treating febrile episodes in the absence of any selective intestinal decontamination with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or ciprofloxacin may have resulted in selection for C. tertium in our patients.     

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of rifaximin compared with placebo and with ciprofloxacin in the treatment of travelers' diarrhea

Rifaximin was compared with placebo and ciprofloxacin for treatment of travelers' diarrhea in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Adult travelers (N = 399) consulting travel clinics in Mexico, Guatemala, and India were randomized to receive rifaximin 200 mg three times a day, ciprofloxacin (500 mg two times a day and placebo once a day), or placebo three times a day for 3 days. Patients recorded in daily diaries the time and consistency of each stool and documented symptoms for 5 days after treatment. Stool samples were collected for microbiologic evaluations before and after treatment. The median time to last unformed stool (TLUS) in the rifaximin group (32.0 hours) was less than one half that in the placebo group (65.5 hours; P = 0.001; risk ratio 1.6; 95% confidence interval 1.2, 2.2; primary efficacy endpoint). The median TLUS in the ciprofloxacin group was 28.8 hours (P = 0.0003 versus placebo; P = 0.35 versus rifaximin). Rifaximin was less effective than ciprofloxacin for invasive intestinal bacterial pathogens. Oral rifaximin is a safe and effective treatment of travelers' diarrhea caused by noninvasive pathogens.     

Treatment of traveler's diarrhea with ciprofloxacin and loperamide.

To determine the efficacy of loperamide given with long- and short-course quinolone therapy for treating traveler's diarrhea, 142 US military personnel were randomized to receive a single 750-mg dose of ciprofloxacin with placebo, 750 mg of ciprofloxacin with loperamide, or a 3-day course of 500 mg of ciprofloxacin twice daily with loperamide. Culture of pretreatment stool specimens revealed campylobacters (41%), salmonellae (18%), enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC, 6%), and shigellae (4%). Of the participants, 87% completely recovered within 72 h of entry. Total duration of illness did not differ significantly among the three treatment groups, but patients in the 3-day ciprofloxacin plus loperamide group reported a lower cumulative number of liquid bowel movements at 48 and 72 h after enrollment compared with patients in the single-dose ciprofloxacin plus placebo group (1.8 vs. 3.6, P = .01; 2.0 vs. 3.9, P = .01). While not delivering a remarkable therapeutic advantage, loperamide appears to be safe for treatment of non-ETEC causes of traveler's diarrhea. Two of 54 patients with Campylobacter enteritis had a clinical relapse after treatment that was associated with development of ciprofloxacin resistance.     

Diarrheal disease among HIV-infected adults in Karnataka, India: evaluation of risk factors and etiology

The objectives of this study were to evaluate characteristics associated with diarrhea, the effect of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) prophylaxis on diarrhea, the response to treatment with ciprofloxacin and tinidazole (Cipro-TZ), and presence of enteric pathogens. Adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus with and without diarrhea served as cases and controls, respectively. Participants provided a medical history and underwent a physical examination. Blood was collected for CD4 cell counts and stool for culture. Cases were treated with Cipro-TZ. Factors associated with a risk of diarrhea included crowded living and no toilet (all P < 0.05). Protective variables (P < 0.05) included a CD4 count greater than 200 cells/mm(3) and TMP/SMX prophylaxis. Cases were more likely to have a pathogen identified (P = 0.05). Eighty-six percent of the cases responded to treatment. Important risk factors for diarrhea were identified. Protection by TMP/SMX reinforces the importance of prophylaxis. These data suggest that treatment with an antibiotic and anti-parasitic medication may be effective.     

In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin compared to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole against Campylobacter spp., Shigella spp. and Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli causing travellers' diarrhea in Egypt

The in vitro activity of ciprofloxacin against bacterial enteropathogens isolated from cases of travellers' diarrhea in Egypt was compared to trimethoprim (TMP) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT). No resistance to ciprofloxacin was noted for any of the Campylobacter jejuni/coli, Shigella spp., and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains examined. However, resistance to TMP and SXT was noted among these same strains. Because of its broad spectrum and lack of resistance, ciprofloxacin is potentially a useful drug for the treatment of diarrhea caused by bacterial enteropathogens encountered in this region of the world.     

Comparison of ciprofloxacin with polymyxin B for infection prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with acute non-lymphocytic leukemia

Twenty-four neutropenic patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for acute non-lymphocytic leukemia were studied in a randomized trial comparing ciprofloxacin with polymyxin B for prevention of infections. Both groups (12 patients each group) received amphotericin B for antifungal prophylaxis. 20 febrile episodes occurred in 22 courses of oral prophylactic ciprofloxacin and 22 occurred in 24 courses of oral prophylactic polymyxin B. Patients receiving ciprofloxacin had a mean time to the first infection-related febrile episode of 7.2 days, compared with 4.3 days for the polymyxin B group (p less than 0.01). Patients receiving ciprofloxacin also had fewer days of fever (average 6.5 days versus 9.8 days for the polymyxin B group, p less than 0.02). Duration of administration of parental antibiotics were also shorter in the ciprofloxacin group (p less than 0.001). Although modifications of the empiric antibiotic regimen were required more frequent in patients receiving polymyxin B, this did not reach statistical significance. These results suggest that ciprofloxacin is a more efficacious oral antimicrobial agent than polymyxin B for the prevention of infections in neutropenic patients with acute non-lymphocytic leukemia.     

Empiric antimicrobial therapy of domestically acquired acute diarrhea in urban adults

From June 1985 to September 1987, 202 adults were enrolled in a randomized, double-blinded study comparing ciprofloxacin (500 mg) with sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim (160 mg/800 mg) or placebo for adults with acute diarrhea. All patients were treated on the day of presentation and received medication on a twice-daily schedule (every 12 hours) for 5 days. Bacterial isolates from these patients included 35 Campylobacter, 18 Shigella, and 15 Salmonella. Treatment at the time of presentation with ciprofloxacin compared with placebo shortened the duration of diarrhea (2.4 vs 3.4 days), and increased the percentage of patients cured or improved by treatment days 1, 3, 4, and 5. Similar significant differences for sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim compared with placebo were not seen.     

An Evaluation of Arbaprostil at Multiple Doses for the Treatment of Acute Duodenal Ulcer: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo-Controlled International Trial

Six hundred and thirty patients were enrolled in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating two arbaprostil dosages (25 micrograms and 50 micrograms) qid for 4 wk for the treatment of acute duodenal ulcers. The healing rates in the placebo, 25-micrograms, and 50-micrograms treatment groups were 39%, 51%, and 60%, respectively. Smoking was found to adversely affect the healing rates in all the treatment groups. Pain severity was less with either arbaprostil treatment. The only side effect found was diarrhea: 10%, 14%, and 32% in the placebo, 25-micrograms, and 50-micrograms treatment groups, respectively. Severe diarrhea occurred in 1% of those patients who received the 50-micrograms dosage regimen, but in none of the other two groups. Arbaprostil at these two dosage levels, when given for 4 wk, appears to be a safe and efficacious agent for the treatment of acute duodenal ulcers.     

Arbaprostil [15(R)-15-methyl prostaglandin E2] in a single nighttime dose of either 50 or 100 micrograms in acute duodenal ulcer

To determine the efficacy of single nighttime doses of arbaprostil [15(R)-15-methyl prostaglandin E2], 50 or 100 micrograms for 4 wk, a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled multiclinic trial was undertaken. Success was defined as complete healing of the ulcer documented by endoscopy. Fifty-one of 64 patients enrolled were considered evaluable. Ulcer healing was documented in 64.3%, 85.7%, and 31.2% of the 100-micrograms arbaprostil, 50-micrograms arbaprostil, and placebo treatment groups (p value vs. placebo = 0.003 and 0.002, respectively). No difference in side effects or changes in laboratory parameters were found between the treatment groups except that diarrhea, usually mild, was found more often in the 100-micrograms arbaprostil group (60.0%) than in the 50-micrograms arbaprostil (31.8%) or placebo groups (23.5%) (p value 100 micrograms arbaprostil vs. placebo = 0.02). A single nighttime administration of arbaprostil seems to be a safe and efficacious agent for the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer.     

Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli as a cause of traveler's diarrhea: clinical response to ciprofloxacin.

The purpose of this study was to determine the role of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) in the development of traveler's diarrhea and the clinical response of patients with EAEC diarrhea following treatment with ciprofloxacin. Sixty-four travelers with diarrhea and no other recognized enteropathogen were enrolled in treatment studies in Jamaica and Mexico from July 1997 to July 1998. EAEC was isolated from 29 travelers (45.3%). There was a significant reduction in the duration of posttreatment diarrhea in the 16 patients treated with ciprofloxacin, as compared with that in the 13 patients who received placebo (mean of 35.3 versus 55.5 hours; P = .049). There was a nonsignificant reduction in the mean number of unformed stools passed during the 72 hours after enrollment in the ciprofloxacin-treated group (5.6), as compared with that in the placebo group (7.5) (P = .128). This study provides additional evidence that EAEC should be considered as a cause of antibiotic-responsive traveler's diarrhea.     

Double-blind controlled study of the efficacy of nifuroxazide versus placebo in the treatment of acute diarrhea in adults

In a double-blind, controlled randomized trial, 88 adult patients with acute diarrhea (more than three watery stools per day) received either 400 mg of nifuroxazide twice daily or placebo for 5 days. The mean duration of diarrhea in the nifuroxazide group was 2.09 days versus 3.26 days in the placebo group (p less than 0.004). The number of bowel movements per day diminished and mucus disappeared more quickly in patients treated by nifuroxazide than in patients of the placebo group. Nifuroxazide was well tolerated and no side effects were observed. Nifuroxazide is an effective therapy for acute diarrhea and can be prescribed from the onset of diarrhea without waiting for stool culture results which can be late or negative.     

Management of recurrent urinary tract infections with patient-administered single-dose therapy

In a randomized crossover trial, 38 women with recurrent urinary tract infections were assigned to use either continuous prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or intermittent self-administered therapy (single-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole taken for acute urinary symptoms). The infection rate for patients on prophylaxis was 0.2 episodes/patient-year compared with 2.2 infections/patient-year for patients on self-administered therapy (p less than 0.001). Thirty-five of thirty-eight symptomatic episodes diagnosed by patients as infection were confirmed microbiologically, and 30 of the 35 infections responded clinically and microbiologically to patient-administered therapy with single-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. No complications were seen in the 5 patients in whom therapy failed. The annual costs of prophylaxis and self-therapy were similar ($256 and $239, respectively) and both were less expensive than conventional therapy in women having 2 or more infections per year. In selected women, self-therapy is efficacious and economical compared with conventional therapy or prophylaxis.     

Antimicrobial therapy of bacterial diarrhea in adult residents of Mexico--lack of an effect.

Two clinical trials in adults in Mexico are reported. In the first trial, long-term residents of Mexico with acute fecal leukocyte-positive diarrhea were randomized to receive trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), clioquinol or a placebo. Neither antimicrobial shortened the illness for all cases or for those with shigellosis or enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhea. In a second study, US and Mexican students received enoxacin, TMP/SMX or a placebo on a blind random basis. While the placebo-treated subjects with bacterial diarrhea tended to be more ill after treatment than other groups, no statistical differences were seen in treatment groups. These studies cast doubts on the value of antimicrobial drugs for 'invasive' and other forms of bacterial diarrhea in adults living in endemic areas and indicate the importance of a placebo control group when conducting clinical trials in these populations.     

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycobacterium marinum determined by E-test and agar dilution

Mycobacterium marinum is recognized as a cutaneous pathogen requiring antibiotic treatment. We compared the E-test with a reference agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of M. marinum to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, doxycycline, rifampicin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ethambutol. MICs obtained after 6 d showed agreement between the E-test and agar dilution within +/- 2 dilutions in 95% of all cases for amikacin, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline and rifampicin. Inhibitory concentrations of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were difficult to define using the E-test because of gradually decreased growth in the presence of increasing concentrations. For clarithromycin, results were generally 1-3 dilution steps lower with the E-test and for ethambutol they were often > 3 dilution steps lower. These differences always appeared in the low MIC range and did not affect the categorization of the strains as susceptible to these 2 antimicrobial agents. All strains were interpreted as susceptible to all tested antibiotics, except for doxycycline, according to recommended breakpoints. Overall, our results suggest that the E-test can be considered an alternative for susceptibility testing of certain antibacterial agents against M. marinum.     

A randomized clinical trial of ciprofloxacin and metronidazole to treat acute pouchitis.

Metronidazole is effective for the treatment of acute pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, but it has not been directly compared with other antibiotics. This randomized clinical trial was designed to compare the effectiveness and side effects of ciprofloxacin and metronidazole for treating acute pouchitis. Acute pouchitis was defined as a score of 7 or higher on the 18-point Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) and symptom duration of 4 weeks or less. Sixteen patients were randomized to a 2-week course of ciprofloxacin 1,000 mg/d (n = 7) or metronidazole 20 mg/kg/d (n = 9). Clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, and histologic features were assessed before and after therapy. Both ciprofloxacin and metronidazole produced a significant reduction in the total PDAI score as well as in the symptom, endoscopy, and histology subscores. Ciprofloxacin lowered the PDAI score from 10.1+/-2.3 to 3.3+/-1.7 (p = 0.0001), whereas metronidazole reduced the PDAI score from 9.7+/-2.3 to 5.8+/-1.7 (p = 0.0002). There was a significantly greater reduction in the ciprofloxacin group than in the metronidazole group in terms of the total PDAI (6.9+/-1.2 versus 3.8+/-1.7; p = 0.002), symptom score (2.4+/-0.9 versus 1.3+/-0.9; p = 0.03), and endoscopic score (3.6+/-1.3 versus 1.9+/-1.5; p = 0.03). None of patients in the ciprofloxacin group experienced adverse effects, whereas three patients in the metronidazole group (33%) developed vomiting, dysgeusia, or transient peripheral neuropathy. Both ciprofloxacin and metronidazole are effective in treating acute pouchitis with significant reduction of the PDAI scores. Ciprofloxacin produces a greater reduction in the PDAI and a greater improvement in symptom and endoscopy scores, and is better tolerated than metronidazole. Ciprofloxacin should be considered as one of the first-line therapies for acute pouchitis.     

Efficacy of rifaximin compared with ciprofloxacin for the treatment of acute infectious diarrhea: a randomized controlled multicenter study

Background/Aims

Ciprofloxacin has been widely prescribed for acute infectious diarrhea. However, the resistance to this drug is increasing. Rifaximin is a novel but poorly absorbed rifamycin derivative. This study evaluated and compared the efficacies of rifaximin and ciprofloxacin for the treatment of acute infectious diarrhea.

Methods

We performed a randomized controlled multicenter study in Korea. Patients with acute diarrhea were enrolled and randomized to receive rifaximin or ciprofloxacin for 3 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to last unformed stool (TLUS). Secondary endpoints were enteric wellness (reduction of at least 50% in the number of unformed stools during 24-hour postenrollment intervals), general wellness (subjective feeling of improvement), and proportion of patients with treatment failure.

Results

Intent-to-treat analysis (n=143) showed no significant difference between the rifaximin and ciprofloxacin groups in the mean TLUS (36.1 hours vs 43.6 hours, p=0.163), enteric wellness (49% vs 57%, p=0.428), general wellness (67% vs 78%, p=0.189), or treatment failure rate (9% vs 12%, p=0.841). The adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusions

These results suggest that rifaximin is as safe and effective as ciprofloxacin in the treatment of acute infectious diarrhea.     

Therapy of travelers' diarrhea with rifaximin on various continents

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of rifaximin, a virtually nonabsorbed antibiotic, 600 and 1200 mg per day, with placebo in patients with travelers' diarrhea. METHODS: This was a multicenter, 1:1:1 randomized, parallel-group, double-blind study, conducted in Antigua, Guatemala; Guadalajara and Morelia, Mexico; and the coast of Kenya north and south of Mombasa. Adult patients with acute travelers' diarrhea were recruited; exclusion criteria included primarily medication that could influence the outcome. Subjects were treated for 3 days, three times daily; follow-up lasted 5 days. For each 24-h period, the subjects completed a diary card. Pre- and posttreatment stool, blood, and urine samples were assessed. RESULTS: Among the 380 volunteers, median time to the last unformed stool was 32.5 and 32.9 h in both rifaximin groups, compared with 60.0 h with placebo (p = 0.0001). Also, secondary clinical outcome measures were favorably influenced by the active agent. No relevant side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Rifaximin is efficacious and safe for treatment of travelers' diarrhea at daily doses of 600 mg or higher.     

Prolonged diarrhea due to ciprofloxacin-resistant campylobacter infection

BACKGROUND: Campylobacter causes >1 million infections annually in the United States. Fluoroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin) are used to treat Campylobacter infections in adults. Although human infections with ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter have become increasingly common, the human health consequences of such infections are not well described. METHODS: A case-control study of persons with sporadic Campylobacter infection was conducted within 7 FoodNet sites during 1998-1999. The E-test system (AB Biodisk) was used to test for antimicrobial susceptibility to ciprofloxacin; ciprofloxacin resistance was defined as a ciprofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration of > or =4 microg/mL. We conducted a case-comparison study of interviewed persons who had an isolate tested. RESULTS: Of 858 isolates tested, 94 (11%) were ciprofloxacin resistant. Among 290 persons with Campylobacter infection who did not take antidiarrheal medications, persons with ciprofloxacin-resistant infection had a longer mean duration of diarrhea than did persons with ciprofloxacin-susceptible infection (9 vs. 7 days [P=.04]). This difference was even more pronounced among the 63 persons who did not take antidiarrheal medications or antimicrobial agents (12 vs. 6 days [P=.04]). In a multivariable analysis-of-variance model, the persons with ciprofloxacin-resistant infection had a longer mean duration of diarrhea than did the persons with ciprofloxacin-susceptible infection (P=.01); this effect was independent of foreign travel. The association between ciprofloxacin resistance and prolonged diarrhea is consistent across a variety of analytical approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter infection have a longer duration of diarrhea than do persons with ciprofloxacin-susceptible Campylobacter infection. Additional efforts are needed to preserve the efficacy of fluoroquinolones.