Comparison of different gonadotrophin preparations in intrauterine insemination cycles for the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND: A comparison of the effectiveness of different gonadotrophin preparations in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles for patients with unexplained infertility was performed. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-one patients were prospectively randomized using computer-generated random numbers into three groups: 81 in the Follitropin alpha (Group I), 80 in the urinary FSH (uFSH) (Group II) and 80 in the hMG (Group III). The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate with duration of stimulation, total gonadotrophin dose, number of dominant follicles, clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage rate and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate being secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the rFSH group (25.9% in Follitropin alpha, 13.8% in uFSH and 12.5% in HMG groups; P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in terms of duration of stimulation, but mean FSH dose consumed per cycle was significantly lower in the recombinant FSH (rFSH) group compared with others (825 IU in Follitropin alpha, 1107 IU in uFSH and 1197 IU in HMG groups; P = 0.001). The number of follicles > or =16 mm diameter was significantly higher in the rFSH group compared with the uFSH and HMG groups (2.6 in Follitropin alpha, 1.3 in uFSH and 1.4 in HMG groups; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: rFSH may result in a better outcome in IUI cycles for unexplained infertility.     

GnRH antagonist-induced inhibition of the premature LH surge increases pregnancy rates in IUI-stimulated cycles. A prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Our prospective randomized controlled trial was designed to assess whether the use of GnRH antagonists can improve the success rate of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS)/intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatments, via inhibition of the premature LH rise. METHODS: A total of 104 patients were randomly divided, using a randomization list, into two groups: in group A (n = 52), recombinant FSH (rFSH) was given with GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix, and in group B (n = 52), the patients received rFSH alone in a manner similar to that of group A. The primary outcome measure was clinical pregnancy rate per couple. RESULTS: The pregnancy rate per patient was 53.8% in group A and 30.8% in group B (P = 0.017). The rate of premature LH surge was 7% in group A and 35% in group B (P < 0.0001). A premature luteinization was observed in two cycles of 144 in group A (1.4%) and in 16 cycles of 154 in group B (10.4%) (P = 0.001). The mean values of LH and progesterone were significantly lower in patients receiving GnRH antagonist than in those who did not (3.3 +/- 3.3 mIU/ml in group A versus 9.9 +/- 7.9 mIU/ml in group B, P < 0.0001, for LH; 1.3 +/- 1.1 ng/ml versus 2.1 +/- 1.9 ng/ml for group A and B, respectively, P < 0.0001, for progesterone). CONCLUSION: The use of GnRH antagonist in COS/IUI cycles improves pregnancy rate, preventing the premature LH rise and luteinization.     

Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: an analysis of factors affecting outcome

A total of 811 intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles in which clomiphene citrate/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) was used for ovarian stimulation were analysed retrospectively to identify prognostic factors regarding treatment outcome. The overall pregnancy rate was 12.6% per cycle, the multiple pregnancy rate 13.7%, and the miscarriage rate 23.5%. Logistic regression analysis revealed five predictive variables as regards pregnancy: number of the treatment cycle (P = 0.009), duration of infertility (P = 0.017), age (P = 0.028), number of follicles (P = 0.031) and infertility aetiology (P = 0.045). The odds ratios for age < 40 years, unexplained infertility aetiology (versus endometriosis) and duration of infertility < or = 6 years were 3.24, 2.79 and 2.33, respectively. A multifollicular ovarian response to clomiphene citrate/HMG resulted in better treatment success than a monofollicular response, and 97% of the pregnancies were obtained in the first four treatment cycles. The results indicate that clomiphene citrate/HMG/IUI is a useful and cost-effective treatment option in women < 40 years of age with infertility duration < or = 6 years, who do not suffer from endometriosis.     

Recombinant human FSH versus highly purified urinary FSH: a randomized study in intrauterine insemination with husbands' spermatozoa

A randomized trial was carried out comparing recombinant FSH (rFSH) and highly purified urinary FSH (uFSH) in intrauterine insemination (IUI) with husbands' spermatozoa. A total of 45 women received rFSH (139 cycles), while 46 women received uFSH (155 cycles). The starting dose was 150 IU/day s.c., beginning on the second day, and on days 6-7 the dose was adjusted according to ovarian response, assessed by vaginal ultrasound and plasma oestradiol concentration. The pregnancy rate according to the intention to treat was 57.8% in rFSH versus 52.2% in uFSH, the corrected pregnancy rates 56.8% and 52.2%, and the cumulative pregnancy rates 69.6% and 61.0%, but the differences were not statistically significant. The per cycle pregnancy rate was 18.12% in rFSH and 15.48% in u-FSH, also not statistically significant. In the rFSH group, the consumption of FSH ampoules per cycle was significantly lower (19.20 +/- 7.02 versus 23. 80 +/- 10.78; P < 0.0001). The ratio of oestradiol/FSH ampoules was significantly higher in rFSH (56.45 +/- 31.26 versus 46.41 +/- 29. 25; P < 0.001). These data indicate that, in IUI cycles, rFSH has a higher potency than uFSH.     

Ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination with donor sperm: a randomized study comparing clomiphene citrate in fixed protocol versus highly purified urinary FSH

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to compare the results of intrauterine donor insemination (DI) under ovarian stimulation with either clomiphene citrate (CC), in a fixed protocol, or FSH, with ovarian monitoring. METHODS: Forty-nine patients were randomized using a computer-generated list to receive highly purified urinary FSH (starting dose of 150 IU) and were subjected to periodic vaginal ultrasound and estradiol determinations. HCG was given when > or =2 follicles (> or =17 mm) were identified and estradiol reached >400 pg/ml. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) was performed 36 h later. The other 51 received CC on a fixed protocol (100 mg/day from the day 5-10 of the ovarian cycle) with HCG being administered on the day 12, and IUI performed 36 h later. Up to six IUI cycles were performed on all patients if pregnancy was not reached before. Women failing to conceive in the CC group underwent IUI with FSH. The main outcome measures were intrauterine gestational sac observed by transvaginal ultrasound, per cycle and per woman pregnancy rate (PR) and multiple PR. RESULTS: The per cycle PR was significantly higher in the FSH group, 14.4% (30/209) versus 6.1% (16/261), as well as the per woman PR, 61.2% (30/49) versus 31.4% (16/51). 12.5% (2/16) of pregnancies obtained in the CC group were multiple, compared with 20% (6/30) in the FSH group. There were no triplets or higher order pregnancies in CC versus two in FSH (6.7% of pregnancies). Patients failing to conceive with CC, who later underwent intrauterine DI with FSH, had similar results to the primary FSH group: 54.3% PR per patient (19/35) and 16.0% per cycle (19/118), with a multiple PR of 31.6% (6/19). The PR for women starting with CC cycles and, if pregnancy was not obtained, continuing with six FSH cycles, was 69.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The PR obtained with CC stimulation was approximately half that obtained with FSH. There was a trend to lower multiple PR with CC. It is recommended that each case should be considered on an individual basis and the treatment options discussed with patients. In our opinion, CC could be a reasonable approach for young women with good prognosis, whereas in the remaining cases FSH would be the preferable method.     

Evaluation of intrauterine insemination with washed spermatozoa from the husband in the treatment of infertility.

In this study, we examined the efficacy of intrauterine insemination with washed spermatozoa from the husband (AIH/IUI) in the treatment of infertility. A total of 127 treatment cycles were completed (1.95 cycles per patient). The indications for AIH/IUI were male subfertility (group I: 53 couples), cervical factor (group II: four couples), male and cervical factor (group III: six couples) and unexplained infertility (group IV: two couples). Sperm washing caused a reduction of the sperm concentration from 52 x 10(6)/ml to 44 x 10(6)/ml (P less than 0.08) and motility from 49% to 45% (P less than 0.03). Twelve pregnancies were achieved (18.5% per couple and 9.5% per cycle): eight pregnancies in group I (15.1%), one in group II (25%) and three in group III (50%). Of the 12 pregnancies, eight occurred in the first insemination cycle, three in the second and one in the third (1.4 cycles/pregnancy). Sperm motility was significantly higher in the pregnant than in the non-pregnant group (65.5% versus 46.4%, respectively; P less than 0.004), whereas no significant difference was observed in the sperm concentration between these two groups (39 x 10(6)/ml and 54 x 10(6)/ml, respectively). In conclusion, AIH/IUI is a technically easy and non-invasive procedure which offers a satisfactory pregnancy rate in selected couples with male subfertility and/or cervical factor infertility.     

The clinical efficacy of low-dose step-up follicle stimulating hormone administration for treatment of unexplained infertility

The present study was designed to compare the clinical efficacy of low-dose step-up follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) administration with conventional FSH protocol (FSH was injected daily starting with a dose of 150 IU), both combined with intrauterine insemination (IUI), for the treatment of unexplained infertility. A total of 97 unexplained infertility couples was randomly assigned to one or other of the two treatment groups, either conventional FSH with IUI (48 patients) or low-dose step-up FSH with IUI (49 patients), and only the first treatment cycle was evaluated in each protocol. The difference in pregnancy rates per cycle was not statistically significant between the low-dose FSH group and the conventional group [seven of 49 (14.3%) and seven of 48 (14.6%) respectively]. A significant reduction in the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was observed in the low-dose group (8.3% versus 27.1%, P < 0.05). The incidence of moderate OHSS requiring hospitalization was reduced significantly in the low-dose group (low-dose 0% versus conventional 16.7%, P < 0.01). However, the low-dose protocol did not completely prevent multiple pregnancies. Our results suggest that the low-dose step-up FSH treatment appeared to be useful for the treatment of unexplained infertility because of the high pregnancy rates and the significant decrease in the incidence of OHSS.     

Vaginal misoprostol enhances intrauterine insemination

This study examined whether the prostaglandin E(1) analogue misoprostol (400 microgram), when placed vaginally at the time of intrauterine insemination (IUI) improves pregnancy rates. A prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized and double-blind study involving 274 women in 494 IUI cycles resulted in a total of 64 pregnancies (13% per cycle). Misoprostol cycles totalled 253, with 43 pregnancies (17% per cycle), whereas placebo cycles totalled 241, with 21 pregnancies (9% per cycle). The cumulative pregnancy rate with misoprostol treatment was significantly greater than with placebo (P = 0.004, Cox proportional hazards regression). The benefit of misoprostol was seen in clomiphene cycles (14 versus 4%, P = 0.006), and was indicated in FSH cycles (33 versus 15%, borderline significance) and natural cycles (15.6 versus 7.7%, not significant), but was not seen in clomiphene/FSH cycles (18.2 versus 23.5%, not significant). Misoprostol treatment did not increase pain score on the day of IUI (1.1 versus 1.4) and at 1 day post IUI (0.6 versus 0.8). Complications were rare in both groups [six (2%) subject cycles in the misoprostol cycles compared with two (1%) in the placebo group]. It is concluded that the use of vaginal misoprostol may improve the chance for pregnancy in women having IUI in a wide variety of cycle types.     

Effect of GnRH antagonists in FSH mildly stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles: a multicentre randomized trial

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of GnRH antagonists in mild controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles is debated. METHODS: Two-hundred and ninety-nine couples with unexplained or mild male factor infertility were enrolled in this international multicentre randomized controlled trial. Women allocated to the GnRH antagonist group (n=148) received 50 IU recombinant FSH starting on day 3 of the menstrual cycle and Ganirelix 0.25 mg daily starting from the day in which a follicle with a mean diameter of 13-14 mm was visualized at ultrasound. Women allocated to the control group (n=151) were administered only 50 IU recombinant FSH starting on day 3 of the menstrual cycle. Couples were recruited only for their first treatment cycle. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the two treatment groups were similar. Clinical pregnancy rates per initiated cycle in women who did and did not receive GnRH antagonists were 12.2 and 12.6%, respectively (P=1.00). The relative risk of conception (95% confidence interval) for the use of GnRH antagonists was 1.0 (0.5-1.9). CONCLUSIONS: In mild COH and IUI cycles, any benefit of the use of GnRH antagonists in improving pregnancy rates is <2-fold increase.     

Infertility: Late low-dose pure follicle stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in intra-uterine insemination cycles

At present, there is general agreement that ovarian stimulationimproves pregnancy rates after intra-uterine insemination (IUI).Also, ovulation induction with gonadotrophins is associatedwith higher success rates than clomiphene citrate in IUI cycles.However, the drawbacks to the use of gonadotrophin stimulationbefore IUI include the risks of ovarian hyperstimulation andmultiple gestation, and the relative cost of a treatment cyclein view of the medication costs and the need for increased monitoringby hormone assays and ultrasonographic measurements. In thepresent prospective randomized trial, the efficacy and safetyof ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate (50 mg/day for5 days) and IUI (clomiphene/IUI group) were compared with thoseof late low-dose pure follicle stimulating hormone (FSH, 75IU/day from day cycle 7 until the leading follicle reached >17mm in diameter) and IUI (FSH/IUI group) in ovulatory women whowere infertile because of unexplained infertility (n=40)or malesubfertility (n =60). The mean length of treatment in the FSHgroup was 6.4±2.5 days. Multiple follicular developmentwas seen in 25% of clomiphene-stimulated cycles but only in8% of those treated with FSH. Pregnancy rate per cycle in clomiphene/IUIand FSH/IUI groups was 4% (4/98) and 13% (12/94) respectively(P=0.02). All pregnancies obtained were singleton. There weretwo and one clinical abortions in the clomiphene/IUI (50%) andFSH/IUI (8%) groups respectively. No patient developed ovarianhyperstimulation syndrome. Use of our therapeutic scheme, whichproved to be efficacious, safe and economic for ovarian stimulationin IUI cycles, is advocated before the institution of in-vitrofertilization (IVF) or gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT)therapy in infertile patients with patent Fallopian tubes. Thislate low-dose technique of administering pure FSH is suitablefor use in offices without immediate access to oestradiol results.     

Cancer and male infertility: Gamete intra-Fallopian transfer or in-vitro fertilization after failed ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility?

A prospective randomized study was designed to compare gameteintra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) and in-vitro fertilization (IVF)and embryo transfer in the treatment of couples who have failedto conceive after at least three cycles of ovarian stimulationand intrauterine insemination (IUI). A total of 69 couples withprimary unexplained infertility of at least 2 years' durationplus at least three failed cycles of ovarian stimulation andIUI were randomly allocated to either GIFT or IVF/embryo transfer.The clinical pregnancy rate was 34% after GIFT treatment and50% after IVF/embryo transfer. This difference was not statisticallysignificant. The twin rate in the IVF/embryo transfer groupwas higher than in the GIFT group (53 versus 17%, P = 0.005).We conclude that patients with unexplained infertility and failedovarian stimulation and IUI can still achieve encouraging pregnancyrates with IVF/embryo transfer or GIFT. Since IVF/embryo transferis the least invasive of the two procedures and may yield diagnosticinformation, we would favour this therapy; however, the numberof embryos transferred should be reduced to two to reduce therisk of twin pregnancy.     

Intercycle variability of ovarian reserve tests: results of a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess prospectively the intercycle variability (ICV) of basal FSH (bFSH), clomiphene citrate challenge test (CCCT) (analysis of the CCCT was performed by the parameter: sum bFSH + sFSH) and exogenous FSH ovarian reserve test (EFORT) (analysis of the EFORT included the following parameters: estradiol (E(2)) increment and inhibin B increment 24 h after administration of FSH), and secondarily to assess the influence of the variability of these ovarian reserve tests. METHODS: Eighty-five regularly menstruating patients, aged 18-39 years, participated in this prospective study, randomized, by a computer-designed four-blocks system into two groups. Forty-three patients underwent a CCCT, and 42 patients underwent an EFORT. Each test was performed 1-4 times in subsequent cycles, one test per cycle. During the first three cycles, patients were treated with intrauterine insemination (IUI). Follicle number and oocyte yield during IVF ovarian stimulation in the fourth cycle were taken as measures for ovarian reserve. RESULTS: The per cycle variance of bFSH ranged from 1.8 to 4.4 (maximum to minimum ratio of 2.44, P < 0.0001), while that of CCCT ranged from 21.3 to 70.6 (3.31, P < 0.0001). No significant change in per cycle variance was found for the E(2) increment (1.25, P > 0.2) and inhibin B increment (1.31, P > 0.2), which were the EFORT parameters. A large ICV of CCCT and bFSH test results was strongly associated with lower ovarian reserve. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the ICV of the inhibin B increment and the E(2) increment in the EFORT is stable in consecutive cycles, which indicates that this reproducible test is a more reliable tool for determination of ovarian reserve than bFSH and CCCT. Women with limited ovarian reserve show a strong ICV of bFSH and FSH response to clomiphene citrate.     

A comparative randomized multicentric study comparing the step-up versus step-down protocol in polycystic ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate follicular development and ovulation comparing the low-dose step-up and the step-down protocols, in women with clomiphene citrate (CC)-resistant polycystic ovaries. METHODS: Eighty-three women were randomized, and treated with recombinant (r) FSH (Puregon) using either the step-up (n=44) or step-down (n=39) protocol. They were followed up for three cycles unless pregnancy occurred. RESULTS: Monofollicular development occurred in 68.2% of the 85 cycles in the step-up group, as compared with 32% of the 72 cycles in the step-down group (P<0.0001). Hyperstimulation was statistically less frequent using the step-up procedure (4.7 versus 36%, P<0.0001). Both protocols used the same number of FSH units per cycle (951+/-586 versus 967+/-458 in step-up and step-down respectively, P=not significant). However, the duration of ovarian stimulation was statistically different (15.2+/-7.0 days in step-up versus 9.7+/-3.1 in step-down, P<0.001). Ovulation was observed in 70.3% of the cycles using the step-up procedure as compared with 51.3% using the step-down procedure (P<0.01). The cumulative rate of clinical gestations during the study did not differ between the two groups (38.6% in the step-up versus 30.8% in the step-down procedure). CONCLUSIONS: The step-up protocol using rFSH (Puregon), is more efficient in obtaining a monofollicular development and ovulation than the step-down protocol, in women with CC-resistant polycystic ovaries. Although the duration of stimulation is longer, the rate of ovarian hyperstimulation is much lower using the step-up protocol.     

Ovarian response to repeated controlled stimulation in in-vitro fertilization cycles in patients with ovarian endometriosis

In-vitro fertilization (IVF) is an effective infertility treatment for women with endometriosis, but most women need to undergo several cycles of treatment to become pregnant. This case-control study was designed to assess how consistently women with ovarian endometriosis respond to ovarian stimulation in consecutive treatment cycles compared to women with tubal infertility. We compared outcome measures in 40 women with a history of surgically confirmed ovarian endometriosis and 80 women with tubal infertility, all of whom had at least three IVF treatment cycles. The groups were matched for age and early follicular follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentration at their first IVF cycle. Outcome measures included number of follicles, number of oocytes, peak oestradiol concentration and number of FSH ampoules required per follicle. Cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates were calculated in both groups. The ovarian endometriosis group had a significantly poorer ovarian response and required significantly more ampoules of FSH per cycle, a difference that became greater with each subsequent cycle. However, cumulative pregnancy (63.3 versus 62.6% by fifth cycle) and live birth (46.8 versus 50.9% by fifth cycle) rates were similar in both groups. In conclusion, despite decreased ovarian response to FSH, ovarian endometriosis does not decrease the chances of successful IVF treatment.     

The type of catheter has no impact on the pregnancy rate after intrauterine insemination: a randomized study

BACKGROUND: This study was done to test the hypothesis that intrauterine insemination (IUI) using a soft-tip catheter results in a higher live birth rate than IUI using a hard-tip catheter. METHODS: Five hundred and forty patients were randomized into those inseminated with a soft-tip catheter (group 1, n = 267) and those inseminated with a hard-tip catheter (group 2, n = 269). Four patients were excluded. Main outcome measures included pregnancy rate and live birth rate per cycle. RESULTS: Both groups were similar with regard to female age, duration of infertility, ovarian stimulation and sperm quality. No significant differences were observed between group 1 and group 2 regarding clinical pregnancy rate per cycle (20 versus 19%), live birth rate per cycle (15 versus 14%), multiple live birth rate per cycle (4 versus 6%) and multiple live birth per total of live births (5 versus 8%, overall 6%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our hypothesis that IUI using a soft tip catheter results in a higher live birth rate per cycle than IUI using a hard-tip catheter was not confirmed in this study. Multiple live birth rate after treatment with low-dose gonadotrophins and IUI can be kept low (6%).     

An economic evaluation of laparoscopic ovarian diathermy versus gonadotrophin therapy for women with clomiphene citrate resistant polycystic ovary syndrome

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy and gonadotrophin ovulation induction for women with clomiphene citrate resistant polycystic ovary syndrome have been shown to result in similar pregnancy rates, but their relative cost-effectiveness has not been evaluated. METHODS: A cost-minimization study was undertaken alongside a randomized controlled trial in women with anovulatory infertility secondary to clomiphene resistant polycystic ovary syndrome. Inclusion criteria were age less than 39 years, body mass index less than 35 kg/m(2), failure to ovulate with 150 mg of clomiphene citrate for 5 days in the early follicular phase, more than 12 months of infertility and no other causes of infertility. Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy was compared with three cycles of urinary or recombinant gonadotrophins. Direct and indirect costs were based on the results of a randomized trial. RESULTS: The cost of a live birth was one third lower in the group that underwent laparoscopic ovarian diathermy compared to those women who received gonadotrophins (19 640 New Zealand dollars and 29 836 New Zealand dollars, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This economic evaluation shows that treating women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome with laparoscopic ovarian diathermy results in a significant reduction in both direct and indirect costs.     

Aromatase inhibition reduces gonadotrophin dose required for controlled ovarian stimulation in women with unexplained infertility

BACKGROUND: Adding clomiphene citrate (CC) to FSH for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) decreases FSH dose required for optimum stimulation. However, because of its anti-estrogenic effects, CC may be associated with lower pregnancy rates offsetting the FSH-dose reduction benefit. Previously, we reported the success of aromatase inhibition in inducing ovulation without antiestrogenic effects. METHODS: A prospective pilot study that included women with unexplained infertility undergoing COS and intrauterine insemination. Thirty-six women received the aromatase inhibitor letrozole + FSH, 18 women received CC + FSH and 56 women received FSH only. Each woman received one treatment regimen in one treatment cycle. All patients were given recombinant or highly purified FSH (50-150 IU/day) starting on day 3 to 7 until day of hCG. RESULTS: The FSH dose needed was significantly lower in letrozole + FSH and CC + FSH groups compared with FSH-only without a difference in number of follicles >1.8 cm. Pregnancy rate was 19.1% in the letrozole + FSH group, 10.5% in the CC + FSH group and 18.7% in the FSH-only group. Both pregnancy rate and endometrial thickness were significantly lower in CC + FSH group compared with the other two groups. Estradiol (E2) levels were significantly lower in the letrozole + FSH group compared with the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to CC, aromatase inhibition with letrozole reduces FSH dose required for COS without the undesirable antiestrogenic effects sometimes seen with CC.     

Inhibin A and inhibin B reflect ovarian function in assisted reproduction but are less useful at predicting outcome

To test the hypothesis that dimeric inhibin A and/or inhibin B concentrations represent improved markers of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome over follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), 78 women who achieved pregnancy within three assisted reproduction treatment cycles were matched to 78 women who underwent at least three assisted reproductive treatment cycles and failed to achieve pregnancy. Baseline serum inhibin B and FSH were obtained between days 1 and 4 in a cycle prior to ovarian stimulation, and inhibin A and B were measured immediately before the ovulatory stimulus and in follicular fluid from the lead follicle. Comparing pregnant and non-pregnant subjects at baseline, younger age (34.0 +/- 0.5 versus 36.0 +/- 0.5 years; P < 0.003) and a combination of FSH lower than the median value (11.2 IU/l) and inhibin B higher than the median value (76.5 pg/ml) were associated with pregnancy (P < 0.03), but FSH (11.7 +/- 0.5 versus 12.9 +/- 0.9 IU/ml) and inhibin B (89.0 +/- 10.2 versus 79.7 +/- 7.7 pg/ml) were not independently associated. At the time of the ovulatory stimulus, serum inhibin A (52.8 +/- 3.8 versus 40.0 +/- 2.7 IU/ml; P < 0.004), inhibin B (1623.8 +/- 165.1 versus 859.2 +/- 94.8 pg/ml; P < 0.0009) and the number of oocytes retrieved (14.6 +/- 0.8 versus 10.1 +/- 0.6; P < 0.0001) were predictive of pregnancy when controlled for age. Inhibin A was correlated with the number of embryos (r = 0.4; P < 0.0001). However, neither inhibin A nor inhibin B provided additional information in predicting successful outcome over age and number of oocytes. We conclude that: (i) in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology, age and number of oocytes retrieved are the strongest predictors of success; (ii) of the parameters available prior to cycle initiation, a combination of lower FSH and higher inhibin B was associated with a greater chance for a successful outcome but an absolute cut-off could not be defined; and (iii) during ovarian stimulation, higher concentrations of inhibin A and inhibin B in serum are associated with successful IVF and mark ovarian reserve as a measure of oocyte number and quality.     

Endocrinology: Ovarian response in consecutive cycles of ovarian stimulation in normally ovulating women

Ovarian stimulation combined with intra-uterine insemination(IUI) is an effective treatment of non-tubal infertility butmost women undergo several cycles of treatment to achieve apregnancy. This prospective study was designed to assess theconsistency (or variation) of ovarian responses and the effectof various ovarian stimulation protocols on this consistencyin consecutive cycles of ovarian stimulation and IUI in womenwith non-ovulatory infertility. A total of 86 regularly menstruatingovulating patients each completed three to six cycles of ovarianstimulation and IUI (n = 347 cycles). Ovarian stimulation wasachieved by sequential clomiphene citrate/human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG), HMG-only or combined gonadotrophin-releasing hormoneanalogue—HMG protocols in 33, 29 and 24 patients respectively,and each patient used the same protocol consistently throughoutthe study. Standard methods were used to monitor ovarian responseand to perform IUI. Using each patient as her own control, repeatedmeasurements analysis of variance revealed consistency of ovarianresponse in consecutive ovarian stimulation cycles, as shownby the number and mean diameter of maturing pre-ovulatory follicles,peak plasma oestradiol, duration of stimulation and mean HMGrequirements. This consistency existed using any of the ovarianstimulation protocols. We conclude that regularly menstruatingand ovulating women are likely to have similar ovarian responsesin consecutive cycles of ovarian stimulation and IUI if thesame ovarian stimulation protocol is used consistently. Thisis expected to reduce the frequency of treatment monitoringand clinic visits and to help schedule the timing of IUI.     

Multiple follicular recruitment and intrauterine insemination outcomes compared by age and diagnosis.

We studied the outcome of our intrauterine insemination (IUI) programme, evaluating female age and diagnosis. One-hundred-and-twenty-six patients less than 36 years of age (mean 30.91 +/- 3.02 years) completed 306 cycles of multiple follicular recruitment (MFR) and timed IUI; 64 patients greater than or equal to 36 years of age (mean 38.36 +/- 2.08 years) completed 166 cycles (total 190 patients, 472 cycles). The male partners' semen was prepared for IUI with wash and swim-up techniques. Diagnostic groups were: male factor (n = 26), idiopathic (n = 33), endometriosis (n = 19), ovulatory disorder (n = 7), other (n = 19) and combined factors (n = 86). Pregnancy rates (% per couple, % per cycle) [overall (31.58, 12.7)] [less than 36 years (38.10, 15.69)] [greater than 36 years (18.75, 7.23)] were greater in the less than 36 years group (P less than 0.025). The probability of conception after three treatment cycles was 0.402 overall, 0.481 for age less than 36 years and 0.252 for age greater than or equal to 36 years. The probability of conception for male factor and idiopathic infertility patients was 0.469 and 0.411 respectively. An age effect was found on pregnancy rates in the idiopathic group only. In conclusion, MFR + IUI is a valuable treatment especially for male factor patients and patients less than 36 years old, with idiopathic infertility.