Quetiapine in combination with citalopram in patients with unipolar psychotic depression

This 6-week, open-label, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of quetiapine in combination with citalopram in adult patients (n=25) with ICD-10/DSM-IV unipolar psychotic depression. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to Week 6 in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-21) score. Secondary endpoints were change from baseline to Week 6 in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale scores. Spontaneously reported adverse events (AEs), the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS), and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) side effects rating scale scores were recorded. Patients' average age was 51.4 years and baseline weight was 72.6 kg. Quetiapine (50-750 mg/day, mean dose+/-SD: 303+/-118 mg/day), in combination with citalopram (20-60 mg/day, mean dose+/-SD: 34+/-12 mg/day), provided significant improvements in depression. Mean (+/- SD) HAM-D-21 was reduced to 13.25+/-10.87 at Week 6 from a baseline value of 31.21+/-5.18. Significant improvement of psychotic symptoms (mean+/-SD) was indicated by the decrease from baseline (59.25+/-6.60) to Week 6 (35.25+/-15.60) in BPRS scores. No serious AEs occurred. The mean change in weight was +2.1 kg. Mean (+/- SD) weight at visit 1 was 72.72 (+/-16.34) kg and mean (SD) weight at visit 4 was 74.79 (+/-18.69) kg. Quetiapine in combination with citalopram appears to be effective and is well tolerated in the treatment of unipolar psychotic depression. Further studies of larger, double-blind, parallel-group design are warranted to confirm these findings.     

Aripiprazole as an adjunctive treatment for refractory unipolar depression

INTRODUCTION: Aripiprazole may be an effective adjunctive treatment in outpatients with unipolar depression that has been refractory to treatment with SSRI or SNRI medication. METHODS: Fifteen subjects with a current DSM-IV diagnosis of MDD which had not responded to SSRI or SNRI treatment were enrolled in a 12 week open-label study of aripiprazole with a maximum dose of 30 mg/day. Patients' current episode averaged 10.4+/-16.6 years, with a range of 3 months to 54 years. Baseline severity averaged 30.1+/-7.1 on HDRS-24, and 19.7+/-8.4 on BDI. Patients had been treated with a mean dose of 79.2+/-28.2 mg/day of fluoxetine equivalents for an average of 1 year prior to starting the study. Five subjects were on SNRI medications and 10 on SSRIs. RESULTS: Seven of 14 (50.0%) subjects were classified as treatment responders, as defined by at least 50% reduction in the HDRS-24 at week 12. Four subjects (28.6%) achieved remission, based on STAR D criteria (HDRS-17 score相似文献   

Yi-gan san for the treatment of borderline personality disorder: an open-label study

BACKGROUND: Numerous medications have been tested on patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Although many of these medications have been demonstrated to be useful, no clear main treatment for BPD has emerged. Despite the efficacy of some of the medicines, acceptability and side effects have proven to be barriers to their use. Recent studies indicate that the traditional Chinese herbal medicine yi-gan san (YGS, yokukan-san in Japanese) may be safe and useful in treating behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia patients. We aimed at evaluating both efficacy and safety of yi-gan san in patients with well-defined BPD. METHODS: Twenty female outpatients diagnosed with BPD according to DSM-IV criteria and the revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines completed a 12-week open-label study with yi-gan san at an average daily dosage of 6.4+/-1.9 g (2.5-7.5 g). Psychometric instruments to assess efficacy included the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression (HAM-D), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), and Aggression Questionnaire (AQ). RESULTS: Most psychometric scale scores exhibited a highly significant improvement (total BPRS; BPRS somatic concern, anxiety, tension, depressive mood, hostility, suspiciousness, motor retardation, uncooperativeness, and excitement subscale; CGI; GAF; AQ) over time. CONCLUSIONS: In this open-label pilot study, patients treated with YGS showed statistically significant reduction on self-rated and clinician-rated scales. The present findings suggest that yi-gan san might be effective for the treatment of a number of BPD symptoms, including low mood, impulsivity, and aggression.     

Combination therapy with amisulpride and antidepressants: clinical observations in case series of elderly patients with psychotic depression

Psychotic depression is classified as a clinical subtype of major depressive disorder. The combination of an antidepressant with an antipsychotic agent has been demonstrated to be efficacious for the treatment of psychotic depression. However, in elderly patients with psychotic depression, little information is available on the efficacy of such combinations. Therefore, we have evaluated combination treatment for 5 weeks with amisulpride and antidepressants in non-demented elderly patients with psychotic depression. Eleven patients were treated with either citalopram 20-40 mg/day (n=5) or mirtazapine 30-60 mg/day (n=6), and amisulpride 75-100 mg/day for 5 weeks. Clinical status was evaluated at baseline and after 3 and 5 weeks using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale--17 items (HDRS) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-S). In 5 of the 11 patients there was remission of depression, while in another 5 patients there was partial remission of depression and in one patient there was no remission. Finally, there was resolution of psychotic symptoms in all the patients involved. One patient developed tremor and rigidity but insisted on continuing with the drug since her psychopathology has improved considerably after the addition of amisulpride to antidepressant treatment. In conclusion, some of the elderly patients with psychotic depression may benefit from the combination of amisulpride and antidepressant pharmacotherapy.     

Amisulpride versus risperidone in the treatment of depression in patients with schizophrenia: a randomized, open-label, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of amisulpride on depression in patients with schizophrenia, in comparison to risperidone. METHOD: In this open-label, 12-week study, patients with stable schizophrenia and a comorbid major or minor depressive episode (DSM-IV) taking risperidone were randomized into a risperidone-continuation group (N = 45) or an amisulpride-switch group (N = 42). The main outcome measures were changes from baseline on the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Secondary efficacy measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the Global Assessment of Functioning. Safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events and extrapyramidal symptoms. RESULTS: The mean dose at endpoint was 4.2 mg/day for risperidone and 458.3 mg/day for amisulpride. Improvements in the CDSS and BDI scores were significantly greater in the amisulpride-switch group than in the risperidone-continuation group at weeks 8 and 12, and at the endpoint. The amisulpride-switch group also showed a significantly greater reduction in the score for the PANSS depression/anxiety factor, and the total score from baseline to endpoint. No significant difference was observed between the two groups for treatment-emergent adverse events or change from baseline for extrapyramidal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Switching from risperidone to amisulpride in patients with stable schizophrenia with comorbid depression improved depressive symptoms significantly compared to continuing with risperidone.     

Quetiapine for the treatment of borderline personality disorder; an open-label study

PURPOSE: Only a few studies have commented on the use of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) features, including affective dysregulation and aggression. We aimed at evaluating both efficacy and safety of quetiapine in a sample of consecutive BPD patients. GENERAL METHODS: 29 BPD outpatients entered, and 23 completed, a 12 week, open-label, regime of quetiapine at an average daily dosage of 540 mg (range: 400-800 mg). Efficacy assessment psychometric instruments included: Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression (HAM-D); Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS); Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF); Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI); and Aggression Questionnaire (AQ). FINDINGS: Both completer and intent-to-treat analysis showed that most psychometric scales' scores exhibited a highly significant (HAM-D: p=.003; BPRS Hostility and Suspiciousness subscales; CGI; GAF; AQ: all at p=.000) improvement over time. Six patients dropped out early from treatment due to side effects; quetiapine was associated with two cases of transient thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Present findings would suggest that quetiapine may be effective for the treatment of a number of BPD features, including low mood and aggression. However, monitoring blood counts in patients receiving quetiapine seems to be justified.     

Adding a low dose atypical antipsychotic drug to an antidepressant induced a rapid increase of plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in patients with treatment-resistant depression

Only two-thirds of depressive patients respond to antidepressant treatment. Recently, addition of an atypical antipsychotic drug to ongoing treatment with an antidepressant has been considered effective and well-tolerated. In the present study, we examined the effects of various atypical antipsychotic drugs as adjuvant to antidepressants, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants and mood stabilizers, on plasma BDNF levels in refractory depressed patients. Forty-five patients who met the DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder (n = 31) or bipolar disorder (10 with bipolar I, 4 with bipolar II) were enrolled in the study. Twenty-one were male and 24 were female, and their ages ranged from 28 to 71 (mean ± SD = 49 ± 12) years. Plasma BDNF levels were measured using a sandwich ELISA. The plasma BDNF levels in responders (those showing a decline in HAM-D scores of 50% or more) were significantly increased 4 weeks after the administration of each atypical antipsychotic drug, while the levels in non-responders were not changed. Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between the changes in HAM-D scores and the changes in plasma BDNF levels. These results suggest that adding an atypical antipsychotic drug to ongoing treatment with an antidepressant or mood stabilizer is useful and well-tolerated for refractory depressed patients, and the efficacy of atypical antipsychotics as an adjuvant might involve an increase of plasma BDNF levels.     

Fluoxetine versus sertraline in the treatment of patients with undifferentiated somatoform disorder: a randomized, open-label, 12-week, parallel-group trial

The present study was conducted to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of fluoxetine and sertraline in the treatment of undifferentiated somatoform disorder (USD), using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15), which was specifically designed for assessing the severity of somatic symptoms. A randomized, 12-week, open-label trial of fluoxetine (10-60 mg/d) and sertraline (25-350 mg/d) in patients with USD was conducted. Six visits, at baseline and weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12, were scheduled. Assessments for effectiveness and tolerability were conducted at each visit. The primary effectiveness measure was the mean change in PHQ-15 total score, from baseline to the end of treatment. Secondary effectiveness measures were the mean changes in total scores on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), from baseline to the end of treatment. A total of 45 subjects were enrolled; of them, 28 were randomly assigned to receive fluoxetine and 17 to receive sertraline. The total score on the PHQ-15 from baseline to the end of treatment significantly decreased in the fluoxetine (-10.7, p<0.0001) and sertraline (-10.3, p<0.0001) treatment groups, with no between-group difference (F=0.0701, p=0.7924). Overall, both treatments were well tolerated and no serious adverse event was reported. This study suggests that both agents may have a potential role in the treatment of USD. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and/or head-to-head comparison study with larger samples are required to draw more definite conclusions.     

Switching from conventional antipsychotics to ziprasidone: A randomized,open-label comparison of regimen strategies

In clinical psychopharmacology, the optimal method of switching from treatment A to treatment B with regard to efficacy and tolerability is an important area of study. We investigated the effects on efficacy and tolerability of switching patients from conventional antipsychotics to ziprasidone. This was a 6-week open-label, randomized study of 54 patients with persistent schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Patients received ziprasidone 40 mg BID for 2 days, with titration up to 80 mg BID thereafter. The switch from conventional antipsychotics to ziprasidone was achieved using one of three discrete schedules: (1) abrupt discontinuation of conventional antipsychotics on day 1; (2) fast taper—50% of conventional antipsychotic dosage on days 1 through 7, followed by discontinuation and (3) slow taper—100% of conventional antipsychotic dosage on days 1 and 2, followed by 50% on days 3 through 7, then discontinuation. We found some evidence that the slow-taper strategy was associated with greater reductions in BPRS total scores early in the study compared to the other two strategies. However, these differences did not remain significant at endpoint, suggesting that there was no overall difference between the strategies.     

Topiramate augmentation in patients with resistant major depressive disorder: a double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial

Background

Despite evolution of new antidepressant treatment, clinicians still encounter challenges in the treatment of depressed patients. Looking for new medications that can potentiate the effects of current antidepressants seems to be necessary. Our objective is to survey the efficacy of topiramate augmentation in resistant major depressive disorder (MDD).

Method

This augmentation trial was designed as an 8-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Fifty three patients with DSM-IV diagnosis of MDD who had failed to respond to at least 8 weeks of treatment with an adequate dose of one of the SSRIs (fluoxetine, citalopram or serteraline) were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive a flexible dose of topiramate (100-200 mg/day) or placebo beside their current antidepressant medication for a period of eight weeks. Outcome measures were Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI).

Results

42 patients completed the study and there were 6 and 5 dropouts in topiramate and placebo groups, respectively. The topiramate group demonstrated significant improvement over the study period based on mean HAM-D score at week 8 compared to baseline (P = .000, Z = 3.699). Those receiving topiramate demonstrated to have a mean decrease of 32.0% in HAM-D score, compared to only 5.5% for those receiving placebo. Depressed mood, suicidality, insomnia (early, middle and late), agitation and anxiety symptoms were significantly improved in the topiramate group.

Conclusion

Our double-blind placebo-controlled study demonstrated that topiramate augmentation potentiate the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in treatment of resistant major depressive disorder. Of note is that our study is preliminary and larger double-blind studies are needed to confirm the results.     

Sertraline treatment of patients with major depressive disorder who failed initial treatment with paroxetine or fluvoxamine

This study was undertaken to examine the long-term effectiveness and safety of switching to sertraline from other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of non-remitted or treatment-intolerant major depressive disorder. The study included 25 patients with major depressive disorder according to DSM-IV-TR criteria. None had achieved remission with paroxetine or fluvoxamine, but each had been used in an adequate dose for an adequate time period or had been intolerant of these SSRIs. Most patients (n=22, 88%) were non-remitters. Switching was accomplished by gradual cross-titration and tapering. We conducted assessments at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. Outcomes were assessed using the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report, Japanese version (QIDS-SRJ) score (primary outcome), the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale. Mean QIDS-SRJ and HDRS scores improved significantly from baseline to week 8 and week 24. At the respective endpoints of weeks 8 and 24, remitters on QIDS-SRJ (≤5) were 2 of 25 (8%) and 4 of 25 (16%). At weeks 8 and 24, 11 of 25 (44%) were responders on QIDS-SRJ (≥50% reduction). Five patients (20%) terminated early, before week 8, because of side effects and/or lack of efficacy. These preliminary data suggest that the switching strategy from paroxetine or fluvoxamine to sertraline might be effective and well-tolerated in patients with non-remitted or treatment-intolerant major depressive disorder.     

Extended release carbamazepine in the treatment of pathological gambling: an open-label study

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and tolerability of extended release carbamazepine was tested in the treatment of pathological gambling (PG). METHOD: Non-depressed outpatients with DSM-IV PG received flexibly dosed extended release carbamazepine in a prospective 10-week open-label trial following a two-week observation period. Subjects were evaluated at baseline and at one week intervals during a four week titration period, and every two weeks thereafter for assessment of gambling behavior, mood, and adverse experiences. The primary efficacy measure was the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale modified for PG (YBOCS-PG). RESULTS: Eight subjects (6 men, 2 women) had at least one post-baseline visit, and five subjects (63%) completed the protocol. Significant improvement was found on the YBOCS-PG (P< .001). Seven of the eight subjects with post-baseline assessment (88%) were considered responders (i.e., achieved "much" or "very much" improvement on the CGI). Four subjects (50%) abstained from gambling during their final month of study participation. Several patients were dropped because of adverse experiences. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that extended release carbamazepine may be effective in the treatment of PG.     

The early non-increase of serum BDNF predicts failure of antidepressant treatment in patients with major depression: A pilot study

In the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), early non-improvement of symptoms after initiation of antidepressant treatment is a highly sensitive and specific marker for final treatment failure. On the other hand, meta-analyses of clinical studies investigating serum BDNF (sBDNF) concentration before and after antidepressant treatment showed an increase of sBDNF during treatment, which was correlated with amelioration of depressive symptoms. No study has yet investigated the predictive value of early changes of sBDNF for final treatment outcome of the individual patient. The aim of this study was to investigate in patients with MDD, whether i) the non-increase of sBDNF in the early course of treatment is a specific and sensitive marker for final treatment failure, ii) whether the sensitivity and specificity of early non-improvement for treatment failure can be increased by combining it with the marker “early non-increase of sBDNF”. For this purpose, we performed a pilot study with 41 inpatients with MDD according to DSM-IV, who were treated in a naturalistic setting. Depression severity and sBDNF were measured in weekly intervals from baseline to week six with the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-21) and ELISA, respectively. The individual markers sBDNF non-increase and HAMD-21 non-improvement from baseline to day 7 or 14 predicted later non-response and non-remission with moderate to high specificity. The combined marker sBDNF non-increase plus HAMD-21 non-improvement at day 14 increased the specificity for non-response and non-remission to 100%. Our data provide the first evidence that the absence of an early increase of sBDNF in conjunction with early non-improvement might be a highly specific peripheral marker predictive for treatment failure in patients with MDD. If replicated, this combined marker could be considered useful for prospective confirmatory trials in patients with MDD.     

Refractory psychotic symptoms in a patient with homozygous sickle cell disease: a 24-month follow-up

The present report describes a case of a 33-year old male patient with homozygous sickle cell disease (SCD) with comorbid psychotic symptoms. The systematical evaluation revealed an intimate association between acute SCD complications, associated with hematological abnormalities, and psychotic symptoms worsening. Clozapine was effective in controlling psychotic symptoms refractory to previous antipsychotic trials.     

Cavum septum pellucidum in subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis: compared with first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE: The cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) is a space between the two leaflets of the septum pellucidum, and is a putative marker of disturbance in early brain development. We examined whether CSP was present more frequently in subjects at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis compared to first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia (genetic high risk, GHR) and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: We evaluated CSP in 87 subjects (30 UHR, 23 GHR, and 34 HC) according to a published grading system using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with 0.45-mm slice thickness. We also assessed two other criteria: presence of CSP on at least one MRI slice, and abnormally large CSP (i.e., > or =6 mm in length). Correlational analysis between CSP measures and clinical symptoms was also examined. RESULTS: Based on the grading scale, the UHR group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of abnormal CSP (grades 2, 3, and 4) compared to the HC group, but there were no significant differences in the incidence of abnormal CSP between the UHR and GHR or the GHR and HC groups. There were no significant differences among the groups in the presence of CSP on at least one MRI slice or abnormally large CSP based on the length of CSP. In addition, no significant correlations between CSP measures and clinical symptoms were found. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that abnormal CSP might be associated with susceptibility to psychosis, although the CSP itself might be a normal anatomical variant. Further studies using a larger sample are needed to clarify issues on neurodevelopmental perspective in subjects at high risk for psychosis.     

Striatal and cortical midline circuits in major depression: implications for suicide and symptom expression

Background

In major depression, the neural mechanisms underlying suicide related thoughts and behaviors as well as the expression of other depressive symptoms are incompletely characterized. Evidence indicates that both the striatum and cortical midline structures (CMS) may be involved with both suicide and emotional dysregulation in unipolar illness. The aim of this study was to identify striatal–CMS circuits associated with current depression severity and suicidal ideation (SI) as well as a history of self-harm.

Methods

Twenty-two male subjects with recurrent unipolar depression were studied using functional MRI. All subjects were unmedicated and without current psychiatric comorbidity. Correlational analyses were used to determine whether striatal–CMS functional connectivity was associated with any of the three clinical variables.

Results

A network involving the bilateral striatum and anterior CMS was found to be associated with depressive symptom severity. Current SI was associated with a similar but less extensive circuit in the left hemisphere. A distinct striatal motor/sensory network was associated with self-harm behaviors, but not current SI or depression severity.

Conclusions

The striatal–anterior CMS circuit likely plays a significant role in the expression of depressive symptoms and SI. In contrast, a striatum–motor/sensory cortex network may be a trait marker of suicide-related behaviors. If replicated, this result might eventually lead to the development of a biomarker that would be useful for studies of pharmacologic and/or psychotherapeutic suicide prevention interventions.     

Prediction of relapse in melancholic depressive patients in a 2-year follow-up study with corticotropin releasing factor test

Purpose

To study the power of CRF stimulation test to predict relapse in a sample of melancholic depressive patients in depressed phase, followed-up over a two-year period from the moment they achieved complete remission of depressive symptoms.

Methods

Fifty-one outpatients diagnosed with unipolar depressive disorder with melancholic features according to DSM-IV were assessed with the CRF test. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-IV) was used for diagnosis. Monthly follow-up visits were held over a two-year period after remission; relapse was established using HDRS according to Frank's criteria [Frank E, Prien RF, Jarret RB, Keller MB, Kupfer DJ, Lavori PW, et al. Conceptualization and rationale for consensus definitions of terms in major depressive disorder: remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991;48:851–5]. Forty-three patients completed the study. Non-controlled antidepressant treatment protocols were used. Predictive statistical analysis was performed through logistic regression.

Findings

The final predictive model included three variables: net area under cortisol curve (NAUCC), previous suicide attempt, and stress during follow-up. Sensitivity was of 89%, and specificity was of 92%. NAUCC has shown a predictive power of 80%, with an optimal cut-off point of 251.24 μg/ml/min.

Conclusions

Cortisol is the hormone of the HPA axis which shows the highest power to predict relapse. NAUCC is the most relevant variable. The complete predictive model is a complex combination of biological, clinical and psychoenvironmental variables (NAUCC, previous suicide attempts, and stress during follow-up). Further studies with better control of the psychoenvironmental variables are required to obtain more precise neuroendocrine findings.     

Alterations in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal/thyroid (HPA/HPT) axes correlated with the clinical manifestations of depression

The alterations of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axes are important neuroendocrine abnormalities in depression. We aimed to identify some potential associations between these alterations and the clinical manifestations of depression in a sample of Chinese origin. 565 depressed patients of Chinese Han region were collected and seven kinds of hormones in HPA and HPT axes were detected. A 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) and a 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14) were used to evaluate the baseline condition of each patient. 519 patients were enrolled into analysis. The patients with dysfunction of HPA axis had susceptibility to agitation symptoms (HAMD9 item) and cognitive disorders (HAMD2, 3 and 9 items), while those with normal function of HPA axis had susceptibility to shallow sleep (HAMD5 item). The patients with dysfunction of HPT axis had susceptibility to difficulty in falling asleep (HAMD4 item), weight loss (HAMD16 item) and gastrointestinal symptoms (HAMD12 item). Besides, the patients with dysfunctions of both HPA and HPT axes showed remarkable retardation symptoms (HAMD8 item). These findings might provide some evidences for the clinical subgrouping and management individualization of depressed patients according to the neuroendocrine alterations.     

Comparative remission rates of schizophrenic patients using various remission criteria

Rationale

New standardized criteria for remission in schizophrenia were presented in 2005 which need to be examined in regard to their significance for clinical trials.

Objectives and methods

Data of six antipsychotic drug trials (n = 2463) were analyzed by evaluating the proportion of participants who meet the new remission criteria, their symptomatic components, other criteria for remission and simple response-measures (at least 50% Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) reduction and an at least 50% PANSS reduction or a CGI-severity score of “mild or better”).Results: A total of 23.3%/27.2% (last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF)/completer analysis (CO)) of the patients with positive symptoms at baseline met the severity criteria of remission at 4 weeks, 10.5%/20.3% (worst case/CO) met the severity and time criteria at 28 weeks (three studies) and 10.9%/32.4% (worst case/CO) met the severity and time criteria at 52 weeks (one study). At 4 weeks 4.5%/5.5% (LOCF/CO) met the severity criteria when a more stringent severity threshold of “very mild or better” was applied. Absence of symptoms was attained only sporadically. The psychotic symptoms component was met by fewer patients than the negative component. The criteria were more stringent than “at least 50% BPRS reduction” and “CGI-severity score not more than mild” and – for the long-term results – than “at least 50% PANSS reduction”. In the short-term analysis, the criteria were less stringent than “at least 50% PANSS reduction”.

Conclusions

The applicability of the severity component of the new criteria in clinical trials was confirmed. The time criterion remains difficult to evaluate.     

Cognitive dysfunctions in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder compared to the patients with schizophrenia patients: relation to overvalued ideas

OBJECTIVE: The clinical overlaps between schizophrenia and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) seem to be related to thought disorders involving obsessions, overvalued ideas, and delusions. Overvalued ideas are beliefs falling in between obsessions and delusions and are stronger than obsessions but weaker than delusions. The goal of the present study was to compare patients with OCD to those with schizophrenia in terms of cognitive functions and to relate cognition and overvalued ideas in OCD. METHODS: Twenty three patients with OCD (free of depression), 24 patients with schizophrenia, and 22 healthy subjects matched to patients in age, gender, education, and hand dominance were included in the study. All subjects were administered neurocognitive tests assessing verbal learning-memory, executive functions, verbal fluency, attention and verbal working memory. RESULTS: Patients with schizophrenia showed worse performance on cognitive tests than the OCD and control groups. The severity of overvalued ideas was significantly correlated to cognitive functions in the OCD group. There were no significant differences in cognitive functions between schizophrenia group and the OCD patients who had higher scores on the Overvalued Ideas Scale (OVIS). CONCLUSION: Overvalued ideas in OCD may be related to cognitive dysfunctions in OCD and this subtype of OCD may have similar characteristics to schizophrenia in terms of cognition.