Efficacy of preoperative donation of blood for autologous use in radical prostatectomy

To determine the amount of blood lost, the number of transfusions, and the effectiveness of preoperative autologous blood donation in radical prostatectomy, 163 patients' records from 1987 to 1991 were reviewed at four university hospitals and three community hospitals. Calculated red cell volume lost was 1003 +/− 535 mL (mean +/− SD), which corresponds to 44 +/− 18 percent (mean +/− SD) of total red cell volume. Preoperative donation of blood for autologous use reduced the rate of transfusion of allogeneic blood from 66 to 20 percent (p < 0.001). Of the patients who donated 1 to 2 units, 32 percent received allogeneic blood; 14 percent of those who donated 3 units received allogeneic blood. Donation of 4 units reduced the allogeneic transfusion rate to 11 percent. However, as the number of units donated increased (1-3 units), the units not transfused also increased (0-21%). Ninety-one (56%) of 163 patients donated fewer than 3 units. Autologous blood donation is effective in minimizing the transfusion of allogeneic blood to radical prostatectomy patients, but many patients do not donate enough blood (< 3 units). The donation of 3 units of blood for autologous use is recommended for patients who undergo radical prostatectomy.     

Impact of intraoperative red blood cell salvage on transfusion requirements and outcomes in radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: Preoperative autologous blood donation lowers preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) levels, and the collected blood is frequently wasted. Intraoperative red blood cell (RBC) salvage provides fresher autologous blood in proportion to surgical blood loss, making cell salvage (CS) in radical prostatectomy (RP) feasible for study.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective study compared two strategies to reduce allogeneic RBC transfusion requirements in RP: preoperative autologous donation (PAD) versus CS. Patients underwent RP by one surgeon at one institution during two comparable time periods in 2005 (PAD—Group 1) and 2006 (CS—Group 2).
RESULTS: Group 1 patients (n = 40) underwent PAD, collecting 63 autologous RBC units; 36 units (57.1%) were reinfused and 27 (42.9%) were wasted. No Group 1 patient received allogeneic blood. Group 2 patients (n = 63) underwent intraoperative CS and received a mean of 287 mL of salvaged blood. In Group 2, two patients (3.2%) with preoperative Hb levels too low to permit autologous donation each received 2 units of allogeneic RBCs. Group 1 patients had significantly lower preoperative (−1.4 g/dL) and postoperative (−0.8 g/dL) Hb values compared to the CS group. There were no significant differences between groups in procedure times, length of stay, or numbers of cancer recurrences over the 24- to 36-month follow-up period.
CONCLUSION: Perioperative CS can effectively replace PAD for RP patients, offering similar avoidance of allogeneic transfusion, with greater convenience and superior postoperative Hb levels.     

Recombinant human erythropoietin as adjuvant treatment for autologous blood donation in elective surgery with large blood needs (> or = 5 units): a randomized study

BACKGROUND: Autologous blood transfusion presents no infectious or immunologic side effects. The aim of this randomized study was to determine the impact of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) on the donation of 5 units of autologous blood by nonanemic patients who were candidates for elective surgery with transfusion requirements of > or = 5 units. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Starting on Day -35, 420 mL of blood was taken weekly. All patients received 200 mg of iron saccharose complex intravenously at each visit and six subcutaneous injections of rHuEPO (141 U/kg) or placebo between Days -21 and -7. RESULTS: Of 50 patients, 45 completed the study (placebo, 21; rHuEPO, 24). Total red cell production was higher in the rHuEPO group (p = 0.001). Donation of 5 units was possible for 67 percent (placebo group) and 79 percent (rHuEPO group) of patients (p = 0.5). The mean number of blood units donated was 4.6 (placebo group) and 4.7 (rHuEPO group). More patients in the placebo group received allogeneic blood (9/21 [43%] vs. 6/23 [26%]), although the difference did not reach significance (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: In nonanemic patients donating 5 units of blood, rHuEPO associated with intravenous iron increased total red cell production. However, no difference was found between the rHuEPO and placebo groups with regard to the number of units of autologous blood donated of the number of patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusion.     

Safety and efficacy of unmodified whole blood vs. buffy coat-depleted red cell concentrates in autologous transfusion of elective orthopaedic surgery patients

Storing autologous blood as whole blood (WB) has been proposed for increasing the cost-effectiveness of preoperative autologous blood donation programmes. However, experimental data suggest that autologous leucocytes might lead to immunomodulation similar to the effect attributed to allogeneic leucocytes. In a retrospective analysis, the postoperative outcome of 120 patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery and having donated up to two units of autologous WB (AWB) was compared with that of a control group of 52 patients, whose autologous donation had been processed into buffy coat-depleted red cell concentrates (RCC). At least one autologous unit, but no allogeneic units, had been transfused in all analysed patients. Donation schemes were equally efficacious in both groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative infection rates between the two groups. Overall rates were 7.7% in the RCC group and 8.3% in the WB group. Surgical, thromboembolic and other recorded complications, length of postoperative hospital stay and days of the use of antibiotics were also not significantly different between the two groups. The results of this study suggest that transfusion of up to two units of unmodified AWB is as efficacious as the transfusion of autologous RCC and does not negatively influence the postoperative outcome in elective orthopaedic surgery.     

A randomized trial on the efficacy of an autologous blood drainage and transfusion device in patients undergoing elective knee arthroplasty

The purpose of the study reported here was the determination of the efficacy of a postoperative autologous blood drainage and transfusion device in reducing allogeneic red cell requirements in patients undergoing elective knee arthroplasty. The study was a randomized controlled trial with adult patients undergoing unilateral elective arthroplastic knee surgery. Patients underwent suction drainage, attached to an autologous blood drainage and transfusion device, or standard suction drainage. Allogeneic red cells were given according to strict transfusion guidelines based on blood loss and postoperative hemoglobin values. Outcome measures included the mean number of allogeneic red cell concentrates required and the number of patients in each group who required no transfusion. Patients assigned to standard suction drainage had a mean allogeneic red cell utilization of 1.2 units (SD 1.0), as compared to a mean of 0.4 units (SD 0.8) in the group undergoing drainage with the autologous blood drainage and transfusion device (p = 0.0007). The percentage of patients not requiring allogeneic red cells was significantly higher in the latter group (74.3% vs. 32.5%; p = 0.002). The postoperative drainage and transfusion device was efficacious in reducing the amount of allogeneic red cells required by patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, and its use resulted in a 42 percent reduction in the number of patients requiring allogeneic transfusion.     

输血支持在造血干细胞移植中的应用

背景:接受造血干细胞移植的患者经常需要血液制品输注支持,而患者对红细胞和血小板输注的需求差异非常大,这主要依赖于造血干细胞移植的类型和患者本身的疾病性质。目的:评价中山大学附属中山医院接受造血干细胞移植患者移植期间输血的需求和数量。方法:收集中山大学附属中山医院2004-01/2010-06接受造血干细胞移植患者的资料,包括移植的适应证、移植的类型、CD34+细胞的数量、红细胞和血小板的输注数量、费用、脱离输注时间以及中性粒细胞和血小板植入时间;红细胞输注的阈值是血红蛋白计数为70g/L,而血小板的输注阈值是计数为20×109L-1。研究分析了患者移植期间红细胞和血小板输注的需求、输注量、输血费用,以及患者的生存情况。结果与结论:自体造血干细胞移植组中有14例(93%)患者,而异基因造血干细胞移植组中有35例(90%)患者显示了造血细胞植入和脱离输注证据。自体造血干细胞移植组取得脱离红细胞输注天数为14.6d,明显短于异基因造血干细胞移植组。与异基因造血干细胞移植组比较,自体造血干细胞移植组红细胞输注单位明显减少;而异基因造血干细胞移植组的红细胞输注费用明显高于自体造血干细胞移植组。输血花费昂贵,但却是造血干细胞移植中必不可少的一部分,异基因造血干细胞移植组需要更多的输血支持。脱离输注时间有望成为评估造血干细胞移植成功的指标。     

The Collaborative Hospital Transfusion Study: variations in use of autologous blood account for hospital differences in red cell use during primary hip and knee surgery

BACKGROUND: Red cell use in patients undergoing Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) 209 procedures (major joint and limb reconstruction procedures of the lower extremities) has been shown to have large, unexplained interhospital variations. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Abstracted records of 2590 consecutive DRG 209 patients at five university hospitals from January 1992 to December 1993 were stratified by procedure and preoperative blood deposit status. Patient characteristics and transfusion and in-hospital outcomes were compared across hospitals. RESULTS: Blood use among patients who did not preoperatively deposit blood was similar across hospitals. Significant differences were found across hospitals for total hip replacement patients in the percentage of patients preoperatively depositing blood (59-80%), percentage of patients receiving transfusion(s) (51 to > 99%), the mean number of units collected per patient (1.6-2.9), and the mean number of unused autologous units per 100 patients (1-185). No significant differences were found in the percentage of those who deposited blood and then required allogeneic units. There was little variability in length of hospital stay or in last hematocrits. Findings were similar for total knee replacement patients. CONCLUSIONS: Interhospital variations in red cell use for primary total hip and knee reconstruction are primarily due to hospital-specific differences in autologous blood collection and transfusion.     

Perceptions and preferences of autologous blood donors

BACKGROUND: The public's perception of autologous blood donation and transfusion as a worthwhile alternative to allogeneic blood transfusion increased dramatically with discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus. However, new concerns are being raised about the health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the procedure. As more restrictive guidelines for autologous blood donation evolve, opposition from patients concerned about exposure to allogeneic blood may arise. Physicians' ability to reassure patients and garner their support for more restrictive policies requires an understanding of patients' concerns. The motivations, perceptions, and preferences of patients currently participating in autologous blood donation programs were investigated in this study. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Results from two questionnaire studies of 647 autologous blood donors are presented. The questionnaires assessed demographics, risk perceptions, preferences, willingness to pay, and reactions to different interventions designed to decrease patient preference for autologous blood donation. RESULTS: Patients expressed a strong preference for the availability of autologous blood and indicated that they would be willing to pay substantial amounts of money even if the procedure were not covered by insurance. Despite education about the low risks of complications from allogeneic transfusions, an aversion to allogeneic transfusion and a willingness to pay for autologous blood donation persisted. Patients were not reassured by information on better infectious disease testing or physician recommendation against autologous blood donation. CONCLUSION: Patients currently participating in autologous blood donor programs strongly prefer continued access to this procedure, primarily because they remain concerned about the complications of allogeneic transfusions. They may not be significantly reassured despite increasingly rigorous and costly improvements in donor and component screening.     

Large volume apheresis of autologous plasma and preparation of autologous fibrin glue from the plasma.

Autologous blood transfusion (ABT) is useful for prevention of undesirable effects of allogeneic blood transfusion. In our hospital, not only autologous whole blood but also autologous red blood cells, autologous fresh frozen plasma (Auto-FFP), and autologous fibrin glue (Auto-FG) are routinely produced for surgical patients. The Auto-FG is prepared from plasma which is separated from manually collected whole blood. However, when a large volume of Auto-FG is required, the plasma obtained by an apheresis method may be useful. Therefore, a pilot study was conducted to determine whether a collection of 2 U (160 ml) of red blood cells (RBCs) and 400 ml of plasma at 1 apheresis is acceptable. We first performed the apheresis on healthy donors, and then applied for autologous blood donation. The apheresis is safe. The collected plasma is used for the production of Auto-FFP and Auto-FG. The remaining RBCs also are used for ABT. The preparation of Auto-FG is simple, and it is effective for the reduction of allogeneic fibrin glue.     

A survey of autologous blood collection and transfusion in Japan in 1997

BACKGROUND: In spite of the fact that autologous blood is safest for a patient to receive, it is not generally appreciated that adverse reactions during donation and transfusion may occur. This study was conducted to assess the state and the risk of autologous blood transfusion in Japan in 1997. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Results of a nation-wide questionnaire-based survey are presented. The questionnaire assessed the number of autologous blood donations, donation procedures, and the adverse reactions associated with donation, preservation, recombination erythropoietin administration and transfusion. RESULTS: Between November 1996 and October 1997, 10,697,000 ml (or 53,485 units, 200 ml = 1 unit) prestorage blood donation were made by 14,200 patients (averages; 1.9 donations/patient, 753 ml/patient, 398 ml/donation). Of these, 87% were transfused to the patients and the remainder were discarded. Using hemodilution and blood salvage intra- or postoperatively some 2,540,000 ml of blood was collected and > 70% of patient-donors received such blood. Adverse reactions were observed with 1.6% (428/26,905) of donations including 6 angina and 2 asthma attacks. There were 63 (0.2%) problems with 28,705 donations and 117 (0.5%) errors/problems reported for 24,929 units transfused; the most frequent problems were clotting on the units and breakage of the bags during storage. Hypotension using hemodilution (3.7%), coagulation (0.9%) or bacterial contamination (0.4%) using salvage were often observed. A 10-20 ml volume of autologous fresh-frozen plasma was transfused to the wrong recipient. CONCLUSION: Autologous blood transfusion accounts for at least 1.1% (2.8% estimated) of the red cell supply in Japan. Errors and adverse reactions are not infrequent in autologous blood programmes. By introducing systematic safety policies, we will be able to make autologous blood transfusion safer.     

Autologous blood donation and subsequent blood use in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Autologous blood donation is designed to avoid complications from allogeneic blood, leaving units of blood in the general blood supply. It is unclear how efficient these programmes are in accomplishing these goals. It is unclear if autologous donation provokes increased need for any transfusion following surgery and whether it can be avoided in low-risk surgeries. Of 430 patients undergoing unilateral primary knee replacement arthroplasty over 12 months in our hospital, 309 had autologous donations and 121 did not. Of the 121 patients who did not donate, 36% completed surgery without transfusion, whereas only 17% of those who had autologous donations did so (P < 0.05). Age less than 65 years, higher baseline and postoperative haemoglobin levels were associated with lower transfusion rates. Patients who had autologous donations were approximately four times more likely to be transfused. As the number of autologous units donated increased, transfusions following surgery increased. Autologous donation did reduce allogeneic blood transfusions. Therefore, autologous blood donation for unilateral total knee arthroplasty is associated with overall increased transfusion rates, but with reduced need for allogeneic blood, independent of other clinical factors associated with transfusion. Therefore, there is need for reconsideration of these programmes relative to specific surgeries.     

Oral or intravenous iron as an adjuvant to autologous blood donation in elective surgery: a randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the capacity of oral and intravenous (i.v.) iron administration during autologous blood donation (ABD) to improve the efficacy of ABD and to prevent the need for allogeneic blood transfusion in patients without iron deficiency who are undergoing major elective surgery for which a minimum of 3 autologous units have been ordered. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients were enrolled in an open-labeled, randomized, controlled trial and assigned to three treatment groups: patients in Group 1 received 3 x 100 mg of Fe2+ per day given orally for 5 weeks before operation; patients in Group 2 received 200 mg of Fe3+ given intravenously after each donation combined with initial i.v. iron supplementation in patients with hemoglobin under 15 g per dL; and patients in Group 3 were in the control group that received no iron medication. A modest ABD program involving weekly phlebotomy and threshold hemoglobin values for donation of 11.5 g per dL in women and 12.0 g per dL in men was performed. RESULTS: Ninety patients, 15 women and 15 men in each of the three groups, completed the study. The mean net red cell production during ABD was no higher (p>0.2) in the iron-treated groups (Group 1: 473 +/- 178 mL; Group 2: 436 +/- 170 mL; Group 3 (controls): 397 +/- 174 mL). The mean number of autologous units donated per patient did not differ (p>0.7) among the groups (Group 1: 3.1 +/- 0.6; Group 2: 2.9 +/- 0.7; Group 3: 3.0 +/- 0.7). The proportion of patients who needed allogeneic blood transfusion showed no significant (p>0.4) advantage for iron treatment, (Group 1: 7%; Group 2: 20%; Group 3: 10%). CONCLUSION: In non-iron-deficient patients undergoing modest ABD without erythropoietin therapy, neither oral nor i.v. application of iron during the preoperative period enhances the success of preoperative ABD.     

Effects of the Sangvia blood collection system on patients undergoing elective hip surgery

We have conducted a randomized controlled study where 164 patients were randomized to receive autologous salvaged blood collected by Sangvia? Blood Salvage System or allogeneic red cell concentrates if transfusion was indicated by clinical judgement. The study was powered to detect if transfusion of autologous blood reduced the occurrence of postoperative infections. We found no statistical significant difference in postoperative infection rate between the groups, but this may be due to the fact that postoperative infections were diagnosed in only five patients. Increased C-reactive protein concentrations slightly above level of significance indicate that autologous blood transfusions stimulate the patient's immune system. However, there was no indication of increased transfusion reaction rate, including febrile reactions, in the autologous group. Transfusion of autologous blood did not reduce the use of allogeneic red cell concentrates. The mean use of allogeneic red cell concentrates was 0.93 units (both groups combined), indicating that the transfusion policy may have been too liberal. There was a highly significant inverse correlation between pre-operative haemoglobin concentration and transfusion of allogeneic blood. In a patient population with a low frequency of postoperative infection, a larger study is needed to clarify if autologous salvaged blood protects against postoperative infections.     

The effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on the efficacy of autologous blood donation in patients with low hematocrits: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled study was undertaken to determine the effect of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) on erythropoiesis, autologous blood collection, and allogeneic transfusion risk in elective surgery patients with low baseline hematocrits. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients (n = 204) with low baseline hematocrits ( < or = 39%), scheduled for orthopedic surgery within 25 to 35 days, were seen every 3 to 4 days for 21 days. At each visit, 450 mL of blood was collected if the hematocrit was > or = 33 percent, and rHuEPO (600 U/kg) or placebo was administered intravenously. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-three patients were evaluable. The number of autologous units collected from the rHuEPO and control groups, respectively, was 4.5 +/− 1.0 and 3.0 +/− 1.1 (p < 0.001), and marrow production of red cells increased by 668 +/− 222 and 353 +/− 155 mL over and above baseline production (p < 0.05). Allogeneic blood transfusion was required by 31 percent of control and 20 percent of rHuEPO patients (p = 0.09). Excluding 8 patients who received > 6 units, 29 percent of control and 14 percent of rHuEPO patients required allogeneic blood (p = 0.015). Logistic regression modeling determined that the risk of allogeneic transfusion was reduced by rHuEPO (p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: The use of rHuEPO stimulates erythropoiesis, permits the storage of more autologous blood, and reduces allogeneic transfusion risk in patients with low hematocrits who are undergoing elective orthopedic surgery. Additional studies are necessary to determine the optimal schedules of rHuEPO administration and autologous blood collection as well as the cost-effectiveness of this strategy.     

输血支持在造血干细胞移植中的应用

背景：接受造血干细胞移植的患者经常需要血液制品输注支持,而患者对红细胞和血小板输注的需求差异非常大,这主要依赖于造血干细胞移植的类型和患者本身的疾病性质。目的：评价中山大学附属中山医院接受造血干细胞移植患者移植期间输血的需求和数量。方法：收集中山大学附属中山医院2004-01/2010-06接受造血干细胞移植患者的资料,包括移植的适应证、移植的类型、CD34＋细胞的数量、红细胞和血小板的输注数量、费用、脱离输注时间以及中性粒细胞和血小板植入时间;红细胞输注的阈值是血红蛋白计数为70g/L,而血小板的输注阈值是计数为20×109L-1。研究分析了患者移植期间红细胞和血小板输注的需求、输注量、输血费用,以及患者的生存情况。结果与结论：自体造血干细胞移植组中有14例（93%）患者,而异基因造血干细胞移植组中有35例（90%）患者显示了造血细胞植入和脱离输注证据。自体造血干细胞移植组取得脱离红细胞输注天数为14.6d,明显短于异基因造血干细胞移植组。与异基因造血干细胞移植组比较,自体造血干细胞移植组红细胞输注单位明显减少;而异基因造血干细胞移植组的红细胞输注费用明显高于自体造血干细胞移植组。输血花费昂贵,但却是造血干细胞移植中必不可少的一部分,异基因造血干细胞移植组需要更多的输血支持。脱离输注时间有望成为评估造血干细胞移植成功的指标。     

Risk for postoperative infection after transfusion of white blood cell-filtered allogeneic or autologous blood components in orthopedic patients undergoing primary arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to obtain data on the incidence of postoperative infection in patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery and receiving white blood cell (WBC)-filtered blood components prepared according to current standards. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 308 consecutive orthopedic patients who opted for preoperative autologous blood donation (PAD) for primary unilateral hip and knee replacement surgery were enrolled in a prospective observational study of the incidence of postoperative infection. Patients with contraindications for PAD or with any infectious disease were not included in the study. To identify probably confounding factors, differences between patient groups were analyzed first. Identified factors, which differed between groups, and variables describing blood supply were further tested in uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis for their independent influence on development of postoperative infection. Infection rates were compared on the basis of actual transfusion groups. RESULTS: Of the 308 study patients, 101 were not transfused, 85 received their PAD, 100 received allogeneic WBC-filtered red blood cells (RBCs), and 22 were given autologous RBCs and additionally allogeneic WBC-filtered RBCs. Overall the infection rate was 6.82 percent (21/308). Infection rates varied significantly between transfusion groups (no transfusion, 6.9%; autologous RBCs, 1.2%; allogeneic WBC-filtered RBCs, 12.0%; both transfusion types, 4.6%; p = 0.03). Allogeneic recipients showed significantly more infections compared to autologous recipients (p = 0.0053). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed transfusion of allogeneic WBC-filtered RBCs as an independent variable predicting postoperative infection (odds ratio, 23.65; confidence interval, 1.3-422.1; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Differences in postoperative infection rates between allogeneic and autologous recipients are still observable, although universal WBC filtration has been introduced into clinical practice.     

Collection and transfusion of blood and blood components in the United States, 1992

BACKGROUND: Studies were conducted to measure the state of the United States' national blood resource in 1992 and changes therein from 1989. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: With data supplied by the American Red Cross and the American Association of Blood Banks, as well as data from a stratified random-sample survey of 3350 non-American Association of Blood Banks hospitals, statistical methods were applied to estimate national blood activities in 1992. RESULTS: The total US blood supply in 1992 was 13,794,000 units, a decrease of 3.1 percent from 1989. Some 11,307,000 red cell units were transfused to 3,772,000 patients, an average of 3.0 units per transfused patient. Preoperative autologous blood deposits totaled 1,117,000 units, a 70-percent increase over 1989. Of this number, 566,000 units (50.7%) were transfused, 5,000 (4.4%) transferred to the allogeneic supply, and 546,000 (48.9%) discarded. Of 436,000 directed-donation units, 136,000 (31.2%) were transfused, 57,000 (13.1%) transferred to allogeneic supply, and 243,000 (55.7%) discarded. The total allogeneic blood supply, including imports, decreased by 7.4 percent from 1989, and allogeneic blood transfusions, including those to children, decreased by 8.6 percent. Over 8,300,000 platelet units were transfused; of these, some 3,600,000 were apheresis platelets. In addition, 2,255,000 units of plasma and 939,000 units of cryoprecipitate were transfused. CONCLUSION: While the US blood supply was adequate for transfusion needs in 1992, blood collections and red cell transfusions had decreased substantially since 1989.     

A study of an educational intervention to decrease inappropriate preoperative autologous blood donation: its effectiveness and the effect on subsequent transfusion rates in elective hysterectomy

BACKGROUND: Decreasing the overcollection of preoperative autologous blood is difficult to achieve. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an educational intervention designed to outline the risks of preoperative autologous collection can decrease such donations and, if so, to determine how this decrease will affect subsequent transfusion rates. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An educational intervention consisting of a didactic presentation to the Department of Gynecology staff about the risks and benefits of autologous blood was implemented. Written material with similar information was given to patients. Subsequently, the percentage of patients donating autologous blood, the number of autologous units donated, and the rates of transfusion in patients eligible for autologous donation who were admitted for elective abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy were measured. These rates were compared to those in similar patients admitted in the 2 years before the educational intervention. RESULTS: After an educational intervention, the proportion of patients donating autologous blood decreased from 53 percent to 26 percent (p<0.01), and the number of units collected per patient decreased from 0.86 to 0.31 (p<0.01); this resulted in a savings of 80 autologous donations per year. Despite no difference in estimated blood loss (p = 0.46), the overall transfusion rate decreased from 10 percent to 3.7 percent (p = 0.03), while the allogeneic transfusion rate demonstrated no significant change (1.1% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Unnecessary preoperative autologous donations by elective hysterectomy patients can be decreased by educating physicians and patients about the risks of preoperative autologous blood donation. Decreasing such unnecessary donations can decrease the subsequent autologous transfusion rate, with its attendant risks, without increasing the risk of allogeneic transfusion.     

Crossover use of donated blood for autologous transfusion: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists concerning whether the costs and potential risks outweigh the potential benefits of "crossover" use in the general blood supply of unutilized blood that was donated for autologous transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Published articles and reports were identified through systematic search of MEDLINE and review of references cited in previously identified articles, textbooks, and reports. Consultation was made with experts in blood donation and transfusion. Additional peer review was received from the American Medical Association (AMA) Council on Scientific Affairs RESULTS: Concern over infectious disease transmission has led to increased interest in and support for autologous transfusion for individuals having planned surgeries. Different requirements exist for collection, labeling, and screening of blood to be used for autologous versus allogeneic transfusions; therefore, procedures for diverting autologous blood donations to the general blood supply involve considerable expense. Several cost-effectiveness studies of autologous blood donation and transfusion conclude that currently this "crossover" appears to be an expensive procedure yielding little increased benefit from a societal perspective. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations in this report were adopted as AMA Policy at the AMA Annual Meeting in June 1997. The AMA does not encourage blood collection programs to "cross over" units donated for autologous use to the allogeneic blood supply. Practice guidelines are needed, and should be utilized to ensure parsimony in the use of autologous blood donations and transfusions.     

Acute normovolemic hemodilution is a cost-effective alternative to preoperative autologous blood donation by patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: Preoperative autologous blood donation is accepted as a standard of care for radical prostatectomy. Acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) is an alternative method for obtaining autologous blood. The cost and benefits of these two autologous blood-collection techniques are compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy underwent ANH to a target hematocrit level of 28 percent. Blood was transfused in the perioperative period to maintain the hematocrit level > 25 percent. Hematocrit levels, transfusion outcomes and costs, and postoperative outcomes for these patients (hemodilution group) were compared with a matched patient cohort who preoperatively donated 3 units of blood for autologous use in prostatectomy surgery (nonhemodilution group, n = 30). RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent ANH to a hematocrit level of 28.7 +/− 1.7 percent, and 1740 +/− 346 mL (3.5 +/− 0.7 units) of blood were collected. Three (10%) of the patients in each cohort had allogeneic blood exposure. Transfusion costs were 73 percent higher for the nonhemodilution group patients than for the hemodilution group patients ($330 +/− $100 vs. $191 +/− $55, p < 0.001). No differences were found in postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION: An integrated blood conservation program utilizing hemodilution and a defined transfusion trigger can decrease the requirement for preoperative donation of blood for autologous use in radical prostatectomy. Point-of-care autologous blood procurement is more cost-effective than preadmission donation of autologous blood units.