Different screening definitions have little impact on polypectomy rate estimates

BACKGROUND:

Polypectomy rate is a surrogate quality indicator for screening colonoscopy. Various methods for identifying screening colonoscopies have been used and it is unclear how different definitions affect the estimated polypectomy rate.

OBJECTIVE:

To estimate polypectomy rates and how they vary according to the definition of a screening colonoscopy, using patient- and endoscopist-reported indications.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional analysis of endoscopists and their patients 50 to 75 years of age who underwent colonoscopy was conducted. Based on questionnaire responses, four patient indications were derived: perceived screening; perceived nonscreening; medical history indicating nonscreening; and combination of the three indications. Endoscopist indication was derived from a questionnaire completed immediately after colonoscopy. Polypectomy status was obtained from provincial physician billing records. Polypectomy rates were computed, while accounting for physician and hospital level clustering, using all four patient indications, endoscopist indication, and the agreement between patient and endoscopist indications. The effect of indications on polypectomy rate was estimated adjusting for age, sex and family history of colorectal cancer.

RESULTS:

A total of 2134 patients and 45 endoscopists were included. The proportion of colonoscopies classified as screening according to the nine indications ranged from 32.2% to 70.9%. Polypectomy rates ranged between 22.6% and 26.2% for screening colonoscopy, and between 27.1% and 30.8% for nonscreening colonoscopy. Adjusted ORs for indication ranged between 0.74 and 0.94.

DISCUSSION:

Although the proportion of colonoscopies identified as screening varied considerably among the indications, the estimated polypectomy rates were similar.

CONCLUSION:

The findings suggest that the way screening is defined does not greatly affect the estimates of polypectomy rate.     

Comparing patient and endoscopist perceptions of the colonoscopy indication

BACKGROUND

Determining whether a colonoscopy is performed for screening or nonscreening purposes can facilitate clinical practice and research. However, there is no simple method to determine the colonoscopy indication using patient medical files or health administrative databases.

OBJECTIVE

To determine patient-endoscopist agreement on the colonoscopy indication.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among staff endoscopists and their patients at seven university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal, Quebec. The study participants were 50 to 75 years of age, they were able to understand English or French, and were about to undergo colonoscopy. Self- (endoscopist) and interviewer-administered (patient) questionnaires ascertained information that permitted classification of the colonoscopy indication. Patient colonoscopy indication was defined as the following: perceived screening (routine screening, family history, age); perceived nonscreening (follow-up); medical history that implied nonscreening; and a combination of the three preceding indications. Agreement between patient and endoscopist indications was measured using concordance and Kappa statistic.

RESULTS

In total, 702 patients and 38 endoscopists participated. The three most common reasons for undergoing colonoscopy were routine screening/regular check-up (33.8%), follow-up to a previous problem (30.2%) and other problem (24.6%). Concordance (range 0.79 to 0.85) and Kappa (range 0.58 to 0.70) were highest for perceived nonscreening colonoscopy. Recent large bowel symptoms accounted for 120 occurrences of disagreement in which the patient perceived a nonscreening colonoscopy while the endoscopist perceived a screening colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient self-report may be an acceptable means for rapidly assessing whether a colonoscopy is performed for screening or nonscreening purposes. Delivery of patient-centred care may help patients and endoscopists reach a shared understanding of the reason for colonoscopy.     

Qualitative study of physician perspectives on classifying screening and nonscreening colonoscopy using administrative health data: Adding practice does not make perfect

BACKGROUND:

Previously developed screening colonoscopy algorithms based on diagnostic and endoscopy procedural variables have not been sufficiently accurate for use in epidemiological and health services research.

OBJECTIVE:

To increase understanding of the administrative health database variables that could help to discern screening and nonscreening colonoscopy.

METHODS:

A qualitative study using physician focus groups was conducted in Montreal (Quebec), Calgary (Alberta) and Toronto (Ontario). Specialty-specific focus group sessions were held among family physicians and gastroenterologists – the physicians responsible for referring patients to and performing screening colonoscopy, respectively. Interview guides were developed to better understand physician clinical and billing practices. Discussions were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the constant comparative approach.

RESULTS:

Forty family physicians and seven gastroenterologists participated in five focus group sessions. Patient variables included demographics (age) and medical history (colorectal cancer risk factors/symptoms, medication for colorectal cancer risk factors/symptoms, gastrointestinal disorders, severe disease). Clinical practice variables included timing of the colonoscopy (evenings, weekends, holidays, during hospitalization; same-day endoscopist consultation and colonoscopy), use of services (hospitalization, annual examination, transfer from other facility) and procedure use patterns (large bowel or other medical/surgical procedure before and subsequent to colonoscopy). However, wide variability in clinical and billing practices will likely preclude the development of a reasonably accurate screening colonoscopy algorithm. Physicians suggested adding a screening colonoscopy code to the administrative health data.

CONCLUSIONS:

Failure to acknowledge the limitations of the provincial administrative health databases to identify screening colonoscopy may lead to incorrect conclusions and the establishment of inappropriate health care policies.     

Point-of-care, peer-comparator colonoscopy practice audit: The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Quality Program--Endoscopy

BACKGROUND

Point-of-care practice audits allow documentation of procedural outcomes to support quality improvement in endoscopic practice.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a colonoscopists’ practice audit tool that provides point-of-care data collection and peer-comparator feedback.

METHODS

A prospective, observational colonoscopy practice audit was conducted in academic and community endoscopy units for unselected patients undergoing colonoscopy. Anonymized colonoscopist, patient and practice data were collected using touchscreen smart-phones with automated data upload for data analysis and review by participants. The main outcome measures were the following colonoscopy quality indicators: colonoscope insertion and withdrawal times, bowel preparation quality, sedation, immediate complications and polypectomy, and biopsy rates.

RESULTS

Over a span of 16 months, 62 endoscopists reported on 1279 colonoscopy procedures. The mean cecal intubation rate was 94.9% (10th centile 84.2%). The mean withdrawal time was 8.8 min and, for nonpolypectomy colonoscopies, 41.9% of colonoscopists reported a mean withdrawal time of less than 6 min. Polypectomy was performed in 37% of colonoscopies. Independent predictors of polypectomy included the following: endoscopy unit type, patient age, interval since previous colonoscopy, bowel preparation quality, stable inflammatory bowel disease, previous colon polyps and withdrawal time. Withdrawal times of less than 6 min were associated with lower polyp removal rates (mean difference −11.3% [95% CI −2.8% to −19.9%]; P=0.01).

DISCUSSION

Cecal intubation rates exceeded 90% and polypectomy rates exceeded 30%, but withdrawal times were frequently shorter than recommended. There are marked practice variations consistent with previous observations.

CONCLUSION

Real-time, point-of-care practice audits with prompt, confidential access to outcome data provide a basis for targeted educational programs to improve quality in colonoscopy practice.     

Predictors of serious complications associated with lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in a major city-wide health region

BACKGROUND:

There are limited data regarding complications associated with colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy in usual clinical practice in Canada.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the risk factors for lower gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy-associated complications in usual clinical practice.

METHODS:

All outpatient lower GI endoscopies performed in Winnipeg (Manitoba) between April 1, 2004 and March 31, 2006, were identified from the provincial physicians’ claims database. All subsequent hospital admissions within 30 days that documented potential complications associated with lower GI endoscopies were identified from the electronic hospital discharges database and reviewed. Multivariate generalized estimating equation regression analysis was performed to determine independent factors (patient, endoscopist and procedure) associated with the risk of developing complications.

RESULTS:

There were 29,990 outpatient lower GI endoscopies performed in Winnipeg during the years studied. Seventy-seven (0.26%) procedures were associated with complications requiring hospitalization within 30 days of the index procedure. Stricture dilation (rate ratio [RR] 23.14; 95% CI 6.70 to 76.51), polypectomy (RR 5.93; 95% CI 3.66 to 9.62), increasing patient age (for each year increase in age, RR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05) and performance of endoscopy by low-volume endoscopists (fewer than 200 procedures per year, RR 2.28; 95% CI 1.18 to 4.42) and family physicians (RR 2.23; 95% CI 1.39 to 3.58) were independently associated with complications.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of the present study suggest that increasing patient age, complex procedures and performance of the index procedure by low-volume endoscopists are independent risk factors for lower GI endoscopy-associated complications in usual clinical practice. This suggests that it may be time to consider implementing minimum volume requirements for endoscopists performing non-screening lower GI endoscopies.     

Serious events in older Ontario residents receiving bowel preparations for outpatient colonoscopy with various comorbidity profiles: a descriptive, population-based study

BACKGROUND:

Polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparations (PEGBPs) and sodium picosulfate (NaPS) are commonly used for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Little is known about adverse events associated with these preparations, particularly in older patients or patients with medical comorbidities.

OBJECTIVE:

To characterize the incidence of serious events following outpatient colonoscopy in patients using PEGBPs or NaPS.

METHODS:

The present population-based retrospective cohort study examined data from Ontario health care databases between April 1, 2005 and December 31, 2007, including patients ≥66 years of age who received either PEGBP or NaPS for an outpatient colonoscopy. Patients with cardiac or renal disease, long-term care residents or patients receiving concurrent diuretic therapy were identified as high risk for adverse events. The primary outcome was a serious event (SE) defined as a composite of nonelective hospitalization, emergency department visit or death within seven days of the colonoscopy.

RESULTS:

Of the 50,660 outpatients ≥66 years of age who underwent a colonoscopy, SEs were observed in 675 (2.4%) and 543 (2.4%) patients in the PEGBP and NaPS groups, respectively. Among high-risk patients (n=30,168), SEs occurred in 481 (2.8%) and 367 (2.8%) of patients receiving PEGBP and NaPS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The SE rate within seven days of outpatient colonoscopy was 24 per 1000 procedures, and among high-risk patients was 28 per 1000 procedures. The rates were similar for PEGBP and NaPS. Clinicians should be aware of the risks associated with colonoscopy in older patients with comorbidities.     

Patient satisfaction with colonoscopy: A literature review and pilot study

BACKGROUND:

Current guidelines recommend that colonoscopic colorectal cancer screening be undertaken every 10 years after the age of 50 years. However, because the procedure does not meet criteria that promote screening uptake, patient satisfaction with colonoscopy may encourage repeat screening.

OBJECTIVE:

To systematically review the literature and conduct a pilot study of patient satisfaction with the colonoscopy experience.

METHODS:

All cohort studies from January 1997 to August 2008 in the MEDLINE database that measured either patient satisfaction with colonoscopy, patient willingness to return for colonoscopy under the same conditions or patient preference for colonoscopy compared with other large bowel procedures were identified. The search was supplemented by journal citation lists in the retrieved articles.

RESULTS:

Of the 29 studies identified, 15 met the inclusion criteria. Consistently, the vast majority of patients (approximately 95%) were very satisfied with their colonoscopy experience. Patient satisfaction was similar for screening and nonscreening colonoscopy. Patient willingness to return for the procedure ranged from 73% to 100%. Of the five studies that examined modality preference, three studies reported the majority of patients preferred colonography to colonoscopy and two studies reported the reverse. Our pilot study findings mirrored those of other studies that were conducted in the United States. The major limitation of the included studies was that patients who were most dissatisfied may have gone elsewhere to have their colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients were very satisfied with colonoscopy. The majority were willing to return for repeat testing under the same conditions, and colonoscopy was not preferred over other modalities. However, studies were limited by methodological shortcomings.     

Rates of minor adverse events and health resource utilization postcolonoscopy

BACKGROUND:

Little is known about minor adverse events (MAEs) following outpatient colonoscopies and associated health care resource utilization.

OBJECTIVE:

To estimate the rates of incident MAE at two, 14 and 30 days postcolonoscopy, and associated health care resource utilization. A secondary aim was to identify factors associated with cumulative 30-day MAE incidence.

METHODS:

A longitudinal cohort study was conducted among individuals undergoing an outpatient colonoscopy at the Montreal General Hospital (Montreal, Quebec). Before colonoscopy, consecutive individuals were enrolled and interviewed to obtain data regarding age, sex, comorbidities, use of antiplatelets/anticoagulants and previous symptoms. Endoscopy reports were reviewed for intracolonoscopy procedures (biopsy, polypectomy). Telephone or Internet follow-up was used to obtain data regarding MAEs (abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting, blood in the stools, rectal or anal pain, headaches, other) and health resource use (visits to emergency department, primary care doctor, gastroenterologist; consults with nurse, pharmacist or telephone hotline). Rates of incident MAEs and health resources utilization were estimated using Bayesian hierarchical modelling to account for patient clustering within physician practices.

RESULTS:

Of the 705 individuals approached, 420 (59.6%) were enrolled. Incident MAE rates at the two-, 14- and 30-day follow-ups were 17.3% (95% credible interval [CrI] 8.1% to 30%), 10.5% (95% CrI 2.9% to 23.7%) and 3.2% (95% CrI 0.01% to 19.8%), respectively. The 30-day rate of health resources utilization was 1.7%, with 0.95% of participants seeking the services of a physician. No predictors of the cumulative 30-day incidence of MAEs were identified.

DISCUSSION:

The incidence of MAEs was highest in the 48 h following colonoscopy and uncommon after two weeks, supporting the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology’s recommendation for assessment of late complications at 14 days. Predictors of new onset of MAEs were not identified, but wide CrIs did not rule out possible associations. Although <1% of participants reported consulting a physician for MAEs, this figure may represent a substantial number of visits given the increasing number of colonoscopies performed annually.

CONCLUSION:

Postcolonoscopy MAEs are common, occur mainly in the first two weeks postcolonoscopy and result in little use of health resources.     

The quality of screening colonoscopies in an office-based endoscopy clinic

BACKGROUND:

Wait times for hospital screening colonoscopy have increased dramatically in recent years, resulting in an increase in patient referrals to office-based endoscopy clinics. There is no formal regulation of office endoscopy, and it has been suggested that the quality of service in some office locations may be inferior to hospital procedures.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the quality of office-based screening colonos-copies at a clinic in Oakville, Ontario, with published benchmarks for cecal intubation, withdrawal times, polyp detection, adenoma detection, cancer detection and patient complications.

METHODS:

Demographic information on consecutive patients and colonoscopy reports by all nine gastroenterologists at the Oakville Endoscopy Centre between August 2006 and December 2007 were prospectively obtained.

RESULTS:

A total of 3741 colonoscopies were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 57.1 years and 51.9% were women. The cecal intubation rate was 98.98% with an average withdrawal time of 9.75 min. A total of 3857 polyps were retrieved from 1725 patients (46.11%), and 1721 adenomas were detected in 953 patients (25.47%). A total of 126 patients (3.37%) had advanced polyps and 18 (0.48%) were diagnosed with colon cancer. One patient (0.027%) had a colonic perforation and two patients had postpolypectomy bleeding (0.053%). These results meet or exceed published benchmarks for quality colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS:

The Oakville Endoscopy Centre data demonstrate that office-based colonoscopies, performed by well-trained physicians using adequate sedation and hospital-grade equipment, result in outcomes at least equal to or better than those of published academic/community hospital practices and are therefore a viable option for the future of screening colonoscopy in Canada.     

Screening Colonoscopy in the US: Attitudes and Practices of Primary Care Physicians

Background

Rising colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in the last decade are attributable almost entirely to increased colonoscopy use. Little is known about factors driving the increase, but primary care physicians (PCPs) play a central role in CRC screening delivery.

Objective

Explore PCP attitudes toward screening colonoscopy and their associations with CRC screening practice patterns.

Design

Cross-sectional analysis of data from a nationally representative survey conducted in 2006–2007.

Participants

1,266 family physicians, general practitioners, general internists, and obstetrician-gynecologists.

Main Measures

Physician-reported changes in the volume of screening tests ordered, performed or supervised in the past 3 years, attitudes toward colonoscopy, the influence of evidence and perceived norms on their recommendations, challenges to screening, and practice characteristics.

Results

The cooperation rate (excludes physicians without valid contact information) was 75%; 28% reported their volume of FOBT ordering had increased substantially or somewhat, and the majority (53%) reported their sigmoidoscopy volume decreased either substantially or somewhat. A majority (73%) reported that colonoscopy volume increased somewhat or substantially. The majority (86%) strongly agreed that colonoscopy was the best of the available CRC screening tests; 69% thought it was readily available for their patients; 59% strongly or somewhat agreed that they might be sued if they did not offer colonoscopy to their patients. All three attitudes were significantly related to substantial increases in colonoscopy ordering.

Conclusions

PCPs report greatly increased colonoscopy recommendation relative to other screening tests, and highly favorable attitudes about colonoscopy. Greater emphasis is needed on informed decision-making with patients about preferences for test options.KEY WORDS: colorectal cancer screening, primary care physicians, colonoscopy screening practices     

Adenoma detection rates decline with increasing procedural hours in an endoscopist’s workload

BACKGROUND:

Operator fatigue may negatively influence adenoma detection (AD) during screening colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVE:

To better characterize factors affecting AD, including the number of hours worked, and the number and type of procedures performed before an index screening colonoscopy.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving individuals undergoing a screening colonoscopy at a major tertiary care hospital in Montreal, Quebec. Individuals were identified using an endoscopic reporting database; AD was identified by an electronic chart review. A hierarchical logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between patient- and endoscopist-related variables and AD.

RESULTS:

A total of 430 consecutive colonoscopies performed by 10 gastroenterologists and two surgeons were included. Patient mean (± SD) age was 63.4±10.9 years, 56.3% were males, 27.7% had undergone a previous colonoscopy and the cecal intubation rate was 95.7%. The overall AD rate was 25.7%. Age was associated with AD (OR 1.06 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.08]), while female sex (OR 0.44 [95% CI 0.25 to 0.75]), an indication for average-risk screening (OR 0.47 [95% CI 0.27 to 0.80]) and an increase in the number of hours during which endoscopies were performed before the index colonoscopy (OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.76 to 0.99]) were associated with lower AD rates. On exploratory univariable analysis, a threshold of 3 h of endoscopy time performed before the index colonoscopy was associated with decreased AD.

CONCLUSION:

The number of hours devoted to endoscopies before the index colonoscopy was inversely associated with AD rate, with decreased performance possibly as early as within 3 h. This metric should be confirmed in future studies and considered when optimizing scheduling practices.     

Effect of hysterectomy on colonoscopy completion rate

BACKGROUND:

Several studies show that colonoscopies are technically more difficult to perform in women than men, especially in women who have undergone abdominal and gynecological surgeries. A review of the literature indicates an increased rate of noncompletion of colonoscopies in most cases; however, no studies have investigated the procedural complication rate, sedation requirements and perception of pain in colonoscopies.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether women who have undergone a previous hysterectomy have a higher noncompletion rate when undergoing a colonoscopy, and to assess whether there is a higher percentage of complications. Furthermore, the present study also aimed to ascertain whether these women required more sedation and whether their perception of pain is greater than that of women who did not undergo previous abdominal surgeries.

METHODS:

The present study was a prospective cohort study of women, 45 to 80 years of age, who underwent colonoscopy (n=508). A total of 229 patients were eligible for the study; they completed a questionnaire, and were subsequently divided into control and hysterectomy groups. Gastroenterologists performed all procedures. After colonoscopy, the patient and endoscopist completed a pain perception questionnaire. Cecal intubation rates were also recorded.

RESULTS:

No significant difference for cecal intubation rates were detected between the two groups (95.7% and 98.7% in hysterectomy and control groups, respectively; P=0.176). The crude OR for the success rate was 0.29 (95% CI 0.05 to 1.90). There was no significant difference between groups regarding sedation or the type of colonoscope. No correlation between the gastroenterologists’ evaluation of pain and patients’ pain was observed.

CONCLUSION:

Hysterectomy did not significantly diminish the cecal intubation rate, and there was no detectable difference in pain perception or sedative dose. Colonoscopy remains an excellent screening and diagnostic tool for all women.     

Severe complications associated with varicella: Province of Quebec,April 1994 to March 1996

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the frequency and severity of serious complications associated with varicella in Quebec; the frequency and severity of cases of congenital varicella; and hospital costs associated with hospitalizations for varicella.

STUDY DESIGN:

All hospitalizations related to varicella were identified through the use of a hospital data bank and pertinent data were collected from hospital records.

SETTING:

Province of Quebec with a population of 6,895,960 people.

STUDY POPULATION:

All cases with a principal or secondary diagnosis of varicella hospitalized in Quebec between April 1, 1994 and March 31, 1996.

OUTCOME MEASURES:

Types of complications and reason for hospitalization, risk of complications and calculation of associated costs were studied.

RESULTS:

Nine hundred nine eligible hospitalizations were identified between April 1, 1994 and March 31, 1996. In all, 583 (64.1%) hospitalizations were for the treatment of complications, 127 (14.0%) for administration of intravenous acyclovir and 199 (21.9%) for supportive care. Healthy people accounted for 644 (70.8%) hospitalizations and immunosuppressed individuals for 136 (15.0%). Among children, one-half of the principal complications were skin infections, while 13.5% and 8.4% of principal complications were pneumonia and neurological complications, respectively. Among adults, the most common complication was pneumonia, with a rate of 43.5%, followed by thrombocytopenia and skin infections, with rates of 22.2% and 14.8%, respectively. The complication rate was 29.2 cases/10,000 cases of varicella.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although perceived as a benign childhood disease by the general population, varicella may be accompanied by severe complications. Morbidity associated with varicella is one of the elements that must be considered when evaluating the usefulness of varicella vaccine.Key Words: Communicable diseases control, Disease notification, Population surveillance, Public health, VaricellaVaricella is usually a benign disease in children. More severe forms of the disease and complications occur proportionately more frequently among adolescents, adults and immunosuppressed people (1-3). In the United States, the average annual number of hospitalizations for varicella has been estimated at 3837, 70% of which were among children under the age of 10 years (1). The risk of hospitalization increases with age: 42 and 127 hospitalizations/10,000 cases were reported for 15- to 19-year olds and for adults 20 years old and over, respectively, compared with about 10 hospitalizations/10,000 for children aged 14 years and younger (1).According to an American study of 4884 cases of varicella carried out over two years in the early 1990s, 100 presented at least one complication, for a rate of 205 cases with complications/10,000 cases of varicella, and 30 had to be hospitalized (hospitalization rate 61/10,000) (2).Among people 19 years of age or younger, skin and soft tissue infections were predominant, and were the cause of over 50% of hospitalizations; among adults, varicella pneumonia was the most common complication. Among both groups, encephalitis, dehydration and hepatitis were among the other, less common causes of hospitalization (2).In Canada, the Canadian Medical Association Journal (4) noted a rate of 2.3 hospitalizations/100,000 in 1984, with hospitalization rates of 27.5/100,000 among infants younger than one year of age, 17.5/100,000 among one- to four-year olds and 5.5/100,000 among five- to 14-year olds (4). In a university-affiliated paediatric hospital in Calgary, Alberta, serving a population of 1.2 million and with approximately 6500 admissions/year, 165 children were hospitalized for varicella (2.6 cases of varicella/1000 admissions) between January 1, 1983 and December 31, 1992 (5).In the present study, we evaluated the morbidity associated with varicella using hospitalized cases and costs related to these hospitalizations.     

Preoperative Colonoscopy for Detection of Synchronous Neoplasms after Insertion of Self-Expandable Metal Stents in Occlusive Colorectal Cancer: Comparison of Covered and Uncovered Stents

Background/Aims

In patients with occlusive colorectal cancers, a complete preoperative evaluation of the colon proximal to the obstruction is often impossible. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of preoperative colonoscopy after stent placement and to determine whether the success rate of colonoscopy differs between covered and uncovered stents.

Methods

Seventy-three patients with malignant colorectal obstruction were enrolled prospectively. In patients with a resectable cancer, a preoperative colonoscopy was performed after insertion of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS). The success rate of complete preoperative colonoscopy was compared between covered and uncovered stents.

Results

Forty-five of 73 patients who underwent stent placement had a resectable cancer (61.6%). A complete preoperative colonoscopy was possible in 40 of 45 patients (88.9%). The success rate of complete preoperative colonoscopy was significantly lower in the covered-stent group when the obstructing mass lesion was located in the sigmoid colon (p=0.024). Synchronous cancer was detected in one patient (2.2%). Stent migration was observed in four patients with a covered stent.

Conclusions

A preoperative complete colonoscopy after SEMS placement was feasible and safe in most patients with malignant colorectal obstruction. Uncovered stents seem to have more advantages than covered stents in preoperative colonoscopy proximal to the obstruction.     

Variation in physician reimbursement for endoscopy across Canada

BACKGROUND

Endoscopy accounts for a significant proportion of income for physicians practicing gastroenterology. Fees are set provincially, and the consistency with regard to compensation for colonoscopy and gastroscopy across the provinces has yet to be established.

OBJECTIVE

To compare and contrast provincial endoscopy fees across Canada and internationally.

METHODS

Provincial and territorial ministries responsible for health care were contacted for their most current fee schedule. This was reviewed, and the billing amounts for colonoscopy and endoscopy collected. International contacts were made with regard to rates outside of Canada.

RESULTS

The mean (± SD) national fee for gastroscopy was $114.19±$31.47 per procedure, with a range of $52.50 to $156.10. Physician billing nationally averaged $170.99±$33.49 per colonoscopy procedure, with a range of $105.00 to $223.00. The province of Quebec provided the least amount of compensation for both procedures, and the province of Nova Scotia provided the most for both procedures.

CONCLUSION

Physician fees for gastroscopy and colonoscopy vary widely among the provinces, and, on average, seem to be less than international rates.     

Computer-based virtual reality colonoscopy simulation improves patient-based colonoscopy performance

BACKGROUND:

Colonoscopy simulators that enable one to perform computer-based virtual colonoscopy now exist. However, data regarding the effectiveness of this virtual training are limited.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether virtual reality simulator training translates into improved patient-based colonoscopy performance.

METHODS:

The present study was a prospective controlled trial involving 18 residents between postgraduate years 2 and 4 with no previous colonoscopy experience. These residents were assigned to receive 16 h of virtual reality simulator training or no training. Both groups were evaluated on their first five patient-based colonoscopies. The primary outcome was the number of proctor ‘assists’ required per colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes included insertion time, depth of insertion, cecal intubation rate, proctor- and nurse-rated competence, and patient-rated pain.

RESULTS:

The simulator group required significantly fewer proctor assists than the control group (1.94 versus 3.43; P≤0.001), inserted the colonoscope further unassisted (43 cm versus 24 cm; P=0.003) and there was a trend to intubate the cecum more often (26% versus 10%; P=0.06). The simulator group received higher ratings of competence from both the proctors (2.28 versus 1.88 of 5; P=0.02) and the endoscopy nurses (2.56 versus 2.05 of 5; P=0.001). There were no significant differences in proctor-, nurse- or patient-rated pain, or attention to discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS:

Computer-based colonoscopy simulation in the initial stages of training improved novice trainees’ patient-based colonoscopy performance.     

Practice and documentation of performance of colonoscopy in a central Canadian health region

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the reporting and performance of colonoscopy in a large urban centre.

METHODS:

Colonoscopies performed between January and April 2008 in community hospitals and academic centres in the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (Manitoba) were identified from hospital discharge databases and retrospective review of a random sample of identified charts. Information regarding reporting of colonoscopies (including bowel preparation, photodocumentation of cecum/ileum, size, site, characteristics and method of polyp removal), colonoscopy completion rates and follow-up recommendations was extracted. Colonoscopy completion rates were compared among different groups of physicians.

RESULTS:

A total of 797 colonoscopies were evaluated. Several deficiencies in reporting were identified. For example, bowel preparation quality was reported in only 20%, the agent used for bowel preparation was recorded in 50%, photodocumentation of colonoscopy completion in 6% and polyp appearance (ie, pedunculated or not) in 34%, and polyp size in 66%. Although the overall colonoscopy completion rate was 92%, there was a significant difference among physicians with varying medical specialty training and volume of procedures performed. Recommendations for follow-up procedures (barium enema, computed tomography colonography or repeat colonoscopy) were recorded for a minority of individuals with reported poor bowel preparation or incomplete colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS:

The present study found many deficiencies in reporting of colonoscopy in typical, city-wide clinical practices. Colonoscopy completion rates varied among different physician specialties. There is an urgent need to adopt standardized colonoscopy reporting systems in everyday practice and to provide feedback to physicians regarding deficiencies so they can be rectified.     

Polyethylene glycol versus sodium picosulfalte bowel preparation in the setting of a colorectal cancer screening program

BACKGROUND:

Adequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy is an important predictor of colonoscopy quality.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the difference in terms of effectiveness between different existing colon cleansing products in the setting of a colorectal cancer screening program.

METHODS:

The records of consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy at the Montreal General Hospital (Montreal, Quebec) between April 2013 and April 2014 were retrospectively extracted from a dedicated electronic digestive endoscopic institutional database.

RESULTS:

Overall, 2867 charts of patients undergoing colonoscopy were assessed, of which 1130 colonoscopies were performed in a screening setting; patients had adequate bowel preparation in 90%. Quality of preparation was documented in only 61%. Bowel preparation was worse in patients receiving sodium picosulfate (PICO) alone compared with polyethylene glycol, in a screening setting (OR 0.3 [95% CI 0.2 to 0.6]). Regardless of the preparation type, the odds of achieving adequate quality cleansing was 6.6 for patients receiving a split-dose regimen (OR 6.6 [95% CI 2.1 to 21.1]). In multivariable analyses, clinical variables associated with inadequate bowel preparation in combined population were use of PICO, a nonsplit regimen and inpatient status. The polyp detection rate was very high (45.6%) and was correlated with withdrawal time.

CONCLUSION:

Preparation quality needs to be more consistently included in the colonoscopy report. Split-dose regimens increased the quality of colon cleansing across all types of preparations and should be the preferred method of administration. Polyethylene glycol alone provided better bowel cleansing efficacy than PICO in a screening setting but PICO remains an alternative in association with an adjuvant.     

Modified Cattell's pancreaticojejunostomy,buttressing for soft pancreases and an isolated biliopancreatic loop are safety measurements that improve outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a pilot study

Background:

Pancreatic anastomotic leak is one of the most serious complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Various factors have been implicated as contributors to pancreatic anastomotic leaks, the incidence of which has been as high as 28% in some series.

Objectives:

We describe technical modifications to Cattell''s technique for pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), with buttressing of ‘soft’ pancreases and use of an isolated biliopancreatic loop for reconstruction following a PD.

Methods:

We report our early experience using this technique in 50 patients who underwent PD between May 2002 and June 2006.

Results:

There was no mortality in our series. The postoperative morbidity rate was 32% (16/50), with major complications occurring in seven (14%) patients. Pancreatic leak occurred in one patient (2%) and bile leak in one patient (2%). Both patients were managed conservatively.

Conclusions:

Reconstruction after PD using an isolated biliopancreatic loop and modifications to Cattell''s technique for PJ, with buttressing of the soft pancreas, can be performed with a low risk of pancreatic anastomotic leakage.