Shockwave lithotripsy: anecdotes and insights

Shockwave lithotripters have evolved considerably since the introduction of the Dornier HM3 machine 20 years ago. Although shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) remains the preferred treatment for the majority of symptomatic upper urinary-tract calculi, newer lithotripters are not as effective and may have a higher risk of side effects. Lack of progress in lithotripter evolution is attributable to inadequate understanding of how and why shockwaves produce effects on stone and tissue. Current knowledge suggests that stones fragment by the mechanisms of compression fracture, spallation, squeezing, and acoustic cavitation, while tissue damage from shockwaves is secondary to cavitation and non-cavitational forces such as sheer stress. It appears likely that most tissue damage from shockwaves is caused by cavitation. As the understanding of SWL matures, new lithotripter designs may emerge that truly represent an improvement on the original Dornier HM3 machine.     

The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy

PURPOSE: The comminution of kidney stones in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is a dose dependent process caused primarily by the combination of 2 fundamental mechanisms, namely stress waves and cavitation. The effect of treatment strategy with emphasis on enhancing the effect of stress waves or cavitation on stone comminution in SWL was investigated. Because vascular injury in SWL is also dose dependent, optimization of the treatment strategy may produce improved stone comminution with decreased tissue injury in SWL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an in vitro experiment system that mimics stone fragmentation in the renal pelvis spherical BegoStone (Bego USA, Smithfield, Rhode Island) phantoms (diameter 10 mm) were exposed to 1,500 shocks at a pulse repetition rate of 1 Hz in an unmodified HM-3 lithotripter (Dornier Medical Systems, Kennesaw, Georgia). The 3 treatment strategies used were increasing output voltage from 18 to 20 and then to 22 kV every 500 shocks with emphasis on enhancing the effect of cavitation on medium fragments (2 to 4 mm) at the final treatment stage, decreasing output voltage from 22 to 20 and then to 18 kV every 500 shocks with emphasis on enhancing the effect of stress waves on large fragments (greater than 4 mm) at the initial treatment stage and maintaining a constant output voltage at 20 kV, as typically used in SWL procedures. Following shock wave exposure the size distribution of fragments was determined by the sequential sieving method. In addition, pressure waveforms at lithotripter focus (F2) produced at different output settings were measured using a fiber optic probe hydrophone. RESULTS: The rate of stone comminution in SWL varied significantly in a dose dependent manner depending on the treatment strategies used. Specifically the comminution efficiencies produced by the 3 strategies after the initial 500 shocks were 30.7%, 59% and 41.9%, respectively. After 1,000 shocks the corresponding comminution efficiencies became similar (60.2%, 68.1% and 66.4%, respectively) with no statistically significant differences (p = 0.08). After 1,500 shocks the final comminution efficiency produced by the first strategy was 88.7%, which was better than the corresponding values of 81.2% and 83.5%, respectively, for the other 2 strategies. The difference between the final comminution efficiency of the first and second strategies was statistically significant (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Progressive increase in lithotripter output voltage can produce the best overall stone comminution in vitro.     

Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shockwaves

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is strong evidence that cavitation bubble activity contributes to stone breakage and that shockwave-bubble interactions are involved in the tissue trauma associated with shockwave lithotripsy. Cavitation control may thus be a way to improve lithotripsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: High-speed photography was used to analyze cavitation bubble activity at the surface of artificial and natural kidney stones during exposure to lithotripter shockwaves in vitro. RESULTS: Numerous individual bubbles formed on the surfaces of stones, but these bubbles did not remain independent but rather combined to form clusters. Bubble clusters formed at the proximal and distal ends and at the sides of stones. Each cluster collapsed to a narrow point of impact. Collapse of the proximal cluster eroded the leading face of the stone, and the collapse of clusters at the sides of stones appeared to contribute to the growth of cracks. Collapse of the distal cluster caused minimal damage. CONCLUSION: Cavitation-mediated damage to stones is attributable, not to the action of solitary bubbles, but to the growth and collapse of bubble clusters.     

Prefocal alignment improves stone comminution in shockwave lithotripsy

BACKGROUND: The Dornier HM-3 machine continues to be one of the most effective lithotripters in use. However, tissue damage occurs in most, if not all, shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) treatments. Cavitation appears to contribute to desired stone comminution as well as to undesired tissue damage. Studies of cavitation in electrohydraulic shockwave lithotripters indicate that the greatest cavitation activity occurs, not at the geometric focus, F2, but at a site proximal to F2 by 1 to 3 cm. In clinical practice, however, stones are aligned with F2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro stone comminution, hemolysis, and free-radical production were assessed along the focal axis, and pig kidneys treated with SWL in vivo were sectioned to determine the extent of hemorrhagic injury along the focal axis. Model gypsum stones received 200 shockwaves in vitro at 18 kV. RESULTS: At F2, the average number of fragments >1.5 mm was 1.3 +/- 0.5, and the weight loss was 11.3 +/- 1.1%. At 2 cm from F2 (F2-2 cm), these values increased to 4 +/- 2.8 and 16.1 +/- 4.2%, respectively. Samples of 10% hematocrit blood were similarly exposed. Hemolysis was equivalent at F2-2 cm (14.7 +/- 2.3%) and F2 (15.2 +/- 3%) but decreased significantly at all other positions. Samples of iodine solution received 1500 shockwaves at 20 kV. Hydroxyl radical production was greatest at F2-2 cm (0.384 +/- 0.035 microM) and decreased significantly distal to this position. The volume of tissue injury in pig kidneys was greatest with prefocal shockwave exposure. CONCLUSION: Stone comminution may be achieved more rapidly without greater tissue damage by a simple shift in stone alignment to F2-2 cm.     

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with distal ureteral calculi does not influence the prostate specific antigen value.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Distal ureteral calculi can be treated with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in situ, which has a high rate of success. As the prostate is in vicinity of this part of the ureter, it is possible that the shockwaves may pass through the prostate also. We evaluated the effect of SWL on the serum concentration of prostate specific antigen (PSA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 44 men with distal ureteral calculi located a maximum of 20 mm from the ureteral orifice and without any history of recent urinary tract infection, benign prostatic hyperplasia, or prostate cancer underwent SWL with the Dornier HM-4 lithotripter. Their serum PSA values were measured 5 minutes before SWL as well as 3 hours and 1, 7, and 30 days afterward. The differences of these PSA values were estimated. From a control group of 10 healthy donors, two consecutive PSA values were obtained 30 days apart. RESULTS: Of these patients, 93% (41/44) were stone free within 1 month according to plain radiographs and ultrasonography. No statistically significant difference was observed between the PSA concentration before and after treatment or between the patients who underwent SWL and the control group. CONCLUSION: Treatment of distal ureteral calculi with SWL does not affect the serum PSA concentration.     

Percutaneous stone implantation in the pig kidney: a new animal model for lithotripsy research

PURPOSE: This report describes a new animal model for research on the parameters of shockwave delivery and the mechanisms of shockwave action in SWL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Female pigs (approximately 45 kg) were anesthetized for creation of an upper pole peripheral caliceal access. The tract was dilated with a 30F Nephromax balloon and Amplatz sheath, and a 24F rigid nephroscope was used to guide a gypsum artificial stone into a lower pole calix. An internal ureteral stent was then placed. After a 2-hour recovery period, lithotripsy was performed using an unmodified Dornier HM3 lithotripter. Following SWL, en bloc excision of the urinary tract was performed, and the stone fragments were collected. RESULTS: As observed by nephroscopy, most stones were surrounded by urine that was free of clot or debris. Urine output was >1 mL/kg per minute by the time the animal was positioned for SWL after a 2-hour observation period. When the conditions of shockwave (SW) exposure were 400 SWs, 20 kV, and 120 SW/min, the efficiency of stone fragment recovery was 85% +/- 2% (N = 6 stones). CONCLUSIONS: This procedure provides a minimally invasive method for placement of model stones of clinically relevant size within the pig kidney. Stone implantation is efficient and permits experiments to be conducted in 1 day. Stone fragmentation can be quantitated, and the animal can serve as its own control. Long-term experiments are also feasible. Overall, this new animal model is appropriate for experimentation on the parameters of SW delivery in SWL.     

Optimizing results of lithotripsy using robust electromagnetic probe.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A significant impediment to the measurement of the pressures and forces created by lithotripter shockwaves has been their destructive properties, which have rendered most measuring devices impractical. We have developed and tested a robust electromagnetic probe to measure cavitational forces in vitro in the focal zones of extracorporeal lithotripters. The probe responds to the pressure gradient generated by the radial motion of cavitation bubbles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effects of shockwaves from the Dornier MPL 9000 electrohydraulic lithotripter were measured over the lifetime of multiple electrodes. RESULTS: The pulse energy from the electrodes dropped off rapidly after approximately 50% of the lifetime quoted by the manufacturer. The electrodes were more efficient at higher power settings. As a result, we altered our protocol for the treatment of ureteral stones to use a higher kilovoltage and a second electrode whenever necessary. Stone-free rates after shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in situ for stones < 11 mm have increased from 68.2% to 83.3%, and the retreatment rate has dropped from 23% to 15%. Despite significantly higher power settings (23.7 kV v 18.7 kV; P < 0.0001), the need for sedoanalgesia has remained relatively constant (26% v 31%). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of cavitational forces from lithotripters using a robust electromagnetic probe is useful in planning treatment strategy. We have demonstrated a clinically measurable improvement since implementing our new treatment protocol. Because the probe responds directly to cavitational forces, it should also prove useful for the objective comparison of different SWL machines.     

Synchronous twin-pulse technique to improve efficacy of SWL: preliminary results of an experimental study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is the treatment of choice for the majority of renal and ureteral stones. The Dornier HM3 lithotripter has good results but with some limitations and complications. A number of second- and third-generation machines have been developed employing different energy sources, focusing devices, and coupling media. These devices overcome some of the limitations and lessen the complications but at the expense of the success rate. Use of the consecutive double-pulse technique (as in the MFL 5000) and of combined under-table and over-table modules consecutively (as in the Siemens Lithostar Plus) improves the efficacy of fragmentation. The aim of this study was to study the effects of the use of synchronous twin pulses generated by under-table and over-table identical shockwave reflectors for stone fragmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a lithotripter with two identical shockwave generators and identical reflectors (twin heads). One reflector was under the table and fixed, while the second reflector was over the table and hangs on a C-arm so that the angle between the axes of the two reflectors could be changed. The second focal points (F2) of the two reflectors lay in the same position. A lucent lightweight acrylic water tank with one side sealed by a silicon rubber membrane was fixed to the SWL table so that the membrane coupled with the water cushions of both reflectors. The tank was filled with degassed water and the targeted material was fixed on a holder and immersed in the water so as to be at F2. Comparison of the use of one shockwave source and two shockwave sources simultaneously was done relative to: (1) cavitation effect on aluminum foil; (2) quality of disintegration, shape of the focal zone, and ideal position of F2 using ceramic blocks; and (3) disintegrative efficacy using dental bone cement. RESULTS: The cavitation effect became more localized with the use of two reflectors. Also, the volume and rate of stone disintegration increased with the use of the two reflectors, with production of fine (<2-mm) fragments. The focal zone became smaller and conical with no propagation of shockwaves beyond F2. These results were more evident if the angle between the axes of the reflectors was 90 degrees. CONCLUSION: This new technique of SWL may improve the efficacy of treatment of urinary tract stones. It also may be less harmful to the renal tissues, but animal experiments must be carried out to prove this.     

Shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones in patients with urinary diversion after radical cystectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During recent years, survival of patients with invasive bladder cancer has been improved by early diagnosis and radical treatment. Urinary lithiasis is not rare in patients who have been submitted to radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. We have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of SWL for these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 11 patients who presented to our lithotripsy department suffering from urinary lithiasis after radical cystectomy. They were all cancer free at the time of treatment, and all underwent SWL on the Dornier HM-3 lithotripter as a first-line treatment. The mean stone burden was 1.85 cm(2), and the stone-to-patient ratio was 1:1. RESULTS: The stone-free rate 1 month after SWL was 63.7%. Patients who were not stone free underwent a second SWL, and the stone-free rate after the second SWL session was 81.8%. We performed percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in one patient after the second SWL session because of the large stone burden remaining (3.2 cm(2)). The remaining patient was submitted to ureterolithotomy. CONCLUSION: Application of SWL gives very good results in the treatment of urinary lithiasis in patients with a urinary diversion. Indeed, the results are equivalent to those achieved in patients without urinary diversion.     

Shock wave lithotripsy for uric acid stones

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for patients with uric acid stones. METHODS: From December 1987 to December 2003, a total of 443 patients with uric acid stones in the kidney or ureter accepted SWL using ultrasound-guided lithotripters together with alkali therapy. Among them, 168 patients with an average stone burden of 9.1 mm were treated using an EDAP LT-01 piezoelectric lithotripter. The other patients, with an average stone burden of 9.6 mm, were treated using a Dornier Compact S electromagnetic lithotripter. RESULTS: The average duration of treatment using the EDAP LT-01 device was 52.1 minutes with a pulse frequency of 1.25-2.5 shocks per second at 100% power. The average treatment parameters on the Dornier Compact S device were 3,196 shocks at 14.8 kV. For the EDAP LT-01, the 3-month stone-free rate was 86.4%, with a retreatment rate of 24.2%. For the Dornier Compact S, the 3-month stone-free rate was 90.3%, with a retreatment rate of 29.0%. Auxiliary therapy with the push-back technique was needed in 0.45% of patients with upper ureteral stones that could not be localized using ultrasound. The treatment results were best for stones smaller than 20 mm. No anaesthesia was required for any patient. CONCLUSION: SWL with ultrasound localization for uric acid stones is safe and effective. The combination of SWL with urine alkalization may further improve the stone-free rate.     

Conversion of an HM3 lithotripter into a research device

PURPOSE: To describe the conversion of a Dornier HM3 lithotripter into a research device and evaluate its performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A used HM3 lithotripter was donated to our university by the St. Thomas' Hospital in London. It was disassembled, shipped to our laboratory, partially assembled, and modified as a research lithotripter. Pressure measurements at several positions and kidney stone model fragmentation tests were performed to evaluate the modified system. Results were compared with information published by other authors and data obtained in our laboratory using another electrohydraulic research lithotripter. RESULTS: Pressure records showed typical lithotripter waveforms with a rapid rise to about 50 MPa, followed by decay to a negative peak of approximately 9 MPa. Maximum compressional peaks were obtained at F2 and 25 mm below F2. Kidney stone model fragmentation was typical for electrohydraulic shockwave lithotripters. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of pressure measurements with data obtained by other authors on the same lithotripter several years ago indicate that the pressure waveform has not changed significantly. A much smaller water tank, a small X-Y-Z positioner, and no X-ray imaging system facilitate the use of this shockwave generator for in vitro experiments with small samples such as vials containing cell suspensions, having the advantage of a reliable, well-known, and well-characterized commercial shockwave generator.     

Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stones break better when the rate of shockwave (SW) delivery is slowed. It has been hypothesized that the greater cavitation accompanying a fast rate shields pulse propagation, thus interfering with the delivery of SW energy to the stone. We tested this idea by correlating waveforms measured at the SW focus with cavitation viewed using high-speed imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A series of U30 gypsum stones held in a 2-mm mesh basket were exposed to 200 SWs at 30 or 120 SW/min from a research electrohydraulic lithotripter (HM3 clone). Waveforms were collected using a fiberoptic probe hydrophone. High-speed imaging was used to observe cavitation bubbles in the water and at the stone surface. Results: Stone breakage was significantly better at 30 SW/min than at 120 SW/min. The rate had little effect on SW parameters in the water free field. In the presence of particulates released from stones, the positive pressure of the SW remained unaffected, but the trailing tensile phase of the pulse was significantly reduced at 120 SW/min. CONCLUSIONS: Cavitation bubbles do not persist between SWs. Thus, mature bubbles from one pulse do not interfere with the next pulse, even at 120 SW/min. However, cavitation nuclei carried by fine particles released from stones can persist between pulses. These nuclei have little effect on the compressive wave but seed cavitation under the influence of the tensile wave. Bubble growth draws energy from the negative-pressure phase of the SW, reducing its amplitude. This likely affects the dynamics of cavitation bubble clusters at the stone surface, reducing the effectiveness of bubble action in stone comminution.     

Salvage extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy after failed distal ureteroscopy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: When intervention is necessary, controversy remains as to the best treatment modality for stones of the distal ureter. In general, ureteroscopy is favored over extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) as the treatment of choice for distal ureteral stones. Although uncommon, ureteroscopy failures have traditionally necessitated repeat ureteroscopy to retrieve retained stone fragments. We evaluated the efficacy of salvage SWL for failed primary distal ureteroscopy in the community setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1989 to December 2000, 6099 patients underwent SWL with the Dornier HM4 lithotripter at our institution. We retrospectively identified 31 patients who had undergone the SWL after a failed distal ureteroscopy. RESULTS: The average stone size in these patients was 9.4 mm, the average time interval from ureteroscopy to SWL was 17.2 days, and the average number of shockwaves delivered was 2386. All patients had had stents placed after ureteroscopy. Twenty-seven patients (87%) had resolution of their stone burden after one SWL session. The remaining four patients underwent additional procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteroscopy is an effective modality for the treatment of distal ureteral stones. However, when unsuccessful, a salvage procedure may be necessary. Extracorporeal lithotripsy is a less invasive procedure with comparable success rates in the distal ureter. This report suggests that salvage SWL is an appropriate option for patients in whom distal ureteroscopic stone extraction fails.     

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of small distal ureteral stones smaller or equal to 5 mm in size is still highly controversial. In distal ureteral stones larger than 5 mm in size, ureteroscopy (URS) has been shown in many studies to be superior to shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). The objective was to analyze the stone-free rate after treatment of distal ureteral stones with in situ SWL or URS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 3,857 SWL treatments were performed at our institution between 1996 and 2001. During this period 45 in situ SWL procedures were performed with the Dornier MFL 5000 lithotripter on distal ureteral stones regardless of the stone size. A total of 262 URS treatments were performed on distal ureteral stones. URS for small (5 mm or less) distal ureteral stones was performed in 110 cases. RESULTS: Distal ureteral stones smaller or equal to 5 mm in size were treated successfully stone free in 78% in one SWL session. Patients required a second SWL in 14% of the cases and 8% of the patients required a third SWL session. URS patients were successfully stone free after the procedure in 97% of the cases. Failed URS that needed an additional URS were performed in 2 and 1% of the patients had one SWL in situ treatment. CONCLUSIONS: URS treatment has shown to be the therapy of choice for distal ureteral stones. It is more effective than SWL treatment in this stone location. In experienced hands URS is a safe though even more invasive procedure than SWL. This can be expected as urologists perform more than 40 URS procedures per year.     

Single-center experience using three shockwave lithotripters with different generator designs in management of urinary calculi

PURPOSE: We retrospectively reviewed the treatment outcomes of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in a single center using either the Wolf Piezolith 2300 (a piezoelectric lithotripter), the Dornier MPL9000 (an electrohydraulic lithotripter), or the Dornier Compact Delta (an electromagnetic lithotripter) from January 1992 to June 2002. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 3123 (1449 Piezolith 2300, 780 MPL9000, and 894 Compact Delta) solitary radiopaque urinary stones of < or =15 mm receiving primary SWL were identified. "Stone free" was defined as the absence of evidence of stone on plain radiography. Treatment outcomes were assessed by the stone-free rate 3 months after one treatment session, the retreatment rate, the auxiliary procedure rate, the complication rate, and the effectiveness quotient (EQ). In order to have a better assessment of the efficacy of individual lithotripters, multiple logistic regression was performed to control various factors affecting treatment outcomes, including lithotripter-type, patients' sex and age, history of previous SWL, the stone characteristics (side, site, and size), and the presence of a stent or nephrostomy tube. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the stone site distribution and mean stone size among the three groups. The overall EQ for the Piezolith 2300, MPL9000, and Compact Delta were 0.345, 0.303, and 0.257, respectively. However, using the multiple logistic regression model, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of a patient being stone-free after 3 month for the Piezolith 2300 and MPL9000 (using the Compact Delta as the referent category) were 1.38 (95% CI 1.15, 1.65) and 1.72 (95% CI 1.39, 2.11), respectively. Patients treated using the MPL9000 had significantly less re-treatment (AOR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.48, 0.69) than the other groups. No significant difference in the auxiliary procedure rate and complication rate for the three machines was observed. CONCLUSION: Based on multivariate analysis results, the Dornier MPL9000 had the best treatment outcomes in terms of stone-free rate and re-treatment rate among the three lithotripters.     

Progressive increase of lithotripter output produces better in-vivo stone comminution

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) has become a first-line intervention for treatment of nephrolithiasis. However, few studies have examined the effects of modifications in the method of shockwave energy administration on comminution efficiency. We propose that a gradual increase in output voltage will produce superior stone fragmentation in comparison with a constant or a decreasing output voltage by optimizing the stress wave and cavitation erosion forces on renal calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BegoStone phantoms were implanted in the renal pelvis of 11 pigs that underwent SWL at a pulse repetition rate of 1 Hz. Animals in the increasing strategy group (N = 4) were subjected to 18, 20, and 22 kV for 600, 600, and 800 shocks, respectively. The second group (N = 4) received a decreasing strategy of 22, 20, and 18 kV for 800, 600, and 600 shocks, respectively. The third group (N = 3) received all 2000 shocks at 20 kV, mimicking the clinical protocol. RESULTS: A progressively decreasing strategy and constant output voltage produced a mean comminution efficiency, or percentage of stone fragments <2 mm, of 89.0% +/- 3.3% and 87.6% +/- 1.7%, respectively. The mean comminution efficiency was improved to 96.5% +/- 1.4% by using the increasing strategy (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A progressive increase in lithotripter output voltage during SWL can produce greater stone fragmentation than protocols employing constant or decreasing output voltage.     

Cavitation microjets as a contributory mechanism for renal calculi disintegration in ESWL

The rarefaction shock wave produced by an extracorporeal shockwave lithotripter can result in liquid failure at numerous discrete sites near the second focus. When the liquid fails, vapor-filled cavities can grow to relatively large sizes and subsequently collapse with enormous violence. This phenomenon, called acoustic cavitation, has been shown to cause severe erosion in materials exposed to cavitation fields. It is proposed in this paper that ESWL devices generate acoustic cavitation in vivo and that the high speed liquid microjets produced during cavitation bubble collapse play an important role in renal calculi disintegration.     

In-Vivo relation between CT attenuation value and shockwave fragmentation

PURPOSE: To use CT attenuation numbers as a means of determining the susceptibility of an artificial stone to in-vivo fragmentation with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four types of artificial kidney stones having different CT attenuation values were used. One randomly selected stone was implanted in the renal pelvis of a kidney of 12 young pigs and exposed in vivo to 2500 shockwaves (21 kV) using an electrohydraulic lithotripter. Bilateral nephrectomy was performed after SWL. Fragments were strained through a mesh with a 3.1-mm grid, and the debris left on the mesh was dried and weighed. Fragmentation coefficients (FCs) were associated with CT attenuation values using a statistical model. RESULTS: The relation between FC and CT number was significant, indicating that as CT attenuation increases, FC is reduced. Larger stone fragments were obtained from stones with higher CT numbers. Initial stone weight was not a significant explanation for variations in FC. CONCLUSION: The CT values could be helpful in selecting patients for SWL in the future. However, other parameters such as stone porosity, shape, and roughness also will have to be considered.     

10-year experience with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the state of Colorado

PURPOSE: To evaluate trends in the utilization of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and the potential need for medical prophylaxis of urolithaisis in the state of Colorado. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined patient and stone characteristics of individuals undergoing SWL for renal or upper-ureteral stones over a 10-year period (1987-1996) at the Kidney Stone Center of the Rocky Mountains. There were no significant changes in the in-state physician referral patterns nor SWL treatment criteria over this time interval. All patients were treated on the Dornier HM3 lithotripter. From September 1999 to December 1999, 198 consecutive patients undergoing SWL filled out a 10-point questionnaire regarding their interest in medical prophylaxis of urolithiasis. RESULTS: The number of patients from Colorado rose 32.5%: from 15.7 per 100,000 population in 1987 to 20.8 per 100,000 in 1996. Patient demographics such as sex, race, age, and history of nephrolithiasis did not change. Furthermore, there were no significant changes in the treated stone size or stone location. The overall increase in treatment numbers was attributable equally to increases in the number of upper ureteral and renal stones. Of the 198 patients questioned, 114 (58%) were recurrent stone formers, but only 52 (45%) of these had been offered a metabolic evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Over the 10 years since the introduction of WSL in Colorado, there has been a gradual increase in its utilization. This higher utilization is probably multifactorial. Patients undergoing SWL have a strong desire to prevent future stone episodes and are very interested in medical prophylaxis of their stone disease.     

Potential for cavitation-mediated tissue damage in shockwave lithotripsy

PURPOSE: Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) injures renal tissue, and cavitation has been reported to mediate some of these effects. Much of the work characterizing the cavitation injury of SWL has been performed in small animals or in vitro. We describe experiments that promote cavitation during SWL and estimate the spatial distribution of the resulting hemorrhagic lesion in a large-animal (porcine) model of clinical lithotripsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The lower pole calix of the left kidney in female farm pigs was targeted for SWL with a Dornier HM3 lithotripter. Intraventricular injections of polystyrene microspheres were made before and at intervals during lithotripsy to blanket systemic circulation with cavitation nuclei. Following SWL, the abdominal viscera were inspected and the kidneys were processed for morphologic analysis. RESULTS: Extensive surface hemorrhage occurred over both the targeted and contralateral kidneys, along with widespread petechial hemorrhage over the spleen, intestines, and peritoneum. The targeted kidneys developed subcapsular hematomas. Histology revealed focal and diffuse damage to the targeted kidneys and vascular rupture in both kidneys with complete necrosis of the walls of intralobular arteries and veins. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the potential for unfocused shockwaves to damage blood vessels outside the focal zone of the lithotripter when the vasculature is seeded with cavitation nuclei. The wide distribution of damage suggests that the acoustic field of a lithotripter delivers negative pressures that exceed the cavitation threshold far off the acoustic axis. The findings underscore that conditions permissive for cavitation can lead to dramatic sequelae during SWL.