Slow wave sleep and dopaminergic treatment in Parkinson’s disease: a polysomnographic study

Background – In Parkinson’s disease (PD), there is entanglement of disease‐inherent and treatment‐induced sleep abnormalities. So far, there has been no study specifically investigating the influence of diurnal dopaminergic medication (DM) on nocturnal slow wave sleep (SWS). Methods – Polysomnographic analysis in 62 PD patients. Results – PD patients had a sleep efficiency of 70 ± 17% and an SWS amount of 16 ± 11%. Linear regression analysis showed no significant correlation between the amounts of SWS and DM. However, patients with a medium DM dosage (300–600 mg of levodopa equivalents) preserved a SWS percentage >25% (p = 0.035, χ² test) more frequently than patients with higher or smaller DM. The DM dosage had no effect on other main sleep parameters. Psychotropic comedication had no effect on SWS percentage. In contrast, SWS amount was inversely correlated with both disease duration and age. It was independent of rapid eye movement sleep amount. The natural female bonus effect on SWS amount was absent in women with PD. Conclusion – Diurnal dopaminergic treatment has no major impact on SWS in PD, which, however, decreases with disease duration. Disease‐dependent, but treatment‐independent decrease in SWS suggests primary degeneration of sleep‐regulating systems in PD.     

Polysomnographic sleep measures in Parkinson's disease patients with treatment-induced hallucinations

Prior studies of sleep in Parkinson's disease (PD) have been compromised by inadequate comparison groups, mixed medication regimens, and absence of quantitative data collection. This is the first study to compare polysomnographic sleep measures in PD patients on only dopaminergic medications with and without hallucinations. We performed two consecutive nights of polysomnography in 10 nondepresed, nondemented PD patients, 5 with and 5 without hallucinations. All patients were being treated with carbidopa/levodopa and a dopaminergic agonist only. Hallucinators and nonhallucinators were group-matched for age, PD duration, severity, and medication doses. Both groups had abnormal sleep records. In particular, there was a reduction in K-complexes and spindle formation, and the frequent occurrence of motor activation during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep consistent with REM behavior disorder. The hallucinator group had a significantly lower sleep efficiency (0.25 in hallucinators vs 0.61 in nonhallucinators, p = 0.006), a reduced total REM sleep time (mean total REM sleep time, 3 minutes in hallucinators vs 50 in nonhallucinators; p = 0.005), and a reduced REM percentage (mean, 5% in hallucinators vs 20% in nonhallucinators; p = 0.011). This study demonstrates that advanced PD patients treated with dopaminergic agents have abnormal sleep patterns and that those with dopaminergic-induced hallucinations have significantly greater REM aberrations than nonhallucinating PD patients.     

Midbrain serotonin transporters in de novo and L‐DOPA‐treated patients with early Parkinson’s disease – a [123I]‐ADAM SPECT study

Background: Dopaminergic availability is known to linearly decline in Parkinson’s disease (PD). In contrast, temporal characteristics of serotonergic markers like the serotonin transporter (SERT) in relation to clinical staging of PD and dopaminergic cell loss are less clear. This study investigated SERT availability using [¹²³I]‐ADAM and single‐photon emission tomography (SPECT) in drug‐naive, de novo patients, i.e., in a PD stage where dopaminergic decline starts to lead to the occurence of the characteristic motor symptoms. Methods: Nine de novo patients with PD and 9 age‐matched healthy controls were studied. Measurements were repeated after 3 months of levodopa treatment in patients with PD, and dopaminergic transporter (DAT) binding was examined at baseline using [¹²³I]‐FP‐CIT SPECT. Results: No alterations of SERT availability were found between groups, and neither correlation between SERT and DAT nor effects of levodopa treatment on SERT was found in patients with PD. Conclusions: These preliminary findings indicate that midbrain SERT is preserved in unmedicated patients at this early stage of PD, supporting the view that serotonergic decline temporally follows dopaminergic cell loss.     

Long‐term safety and efficacy of levodopa‐carbidopa intestinal gel in advanced Parkinson's disease

Background: Levodopa‐carbidopa intestinal gel (designated as carbidopa‐levodopa enteral suspension in the United States) provides stable plasma levodopa concentrations and reduces motor fluctuations in advanced Parkinson's disease patients through continuous delivery of levodopa via percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy. We report long‐term safety and efficacy outcomes from an open‐label phase 3 treatment program. Methods: PD patients (n = 262) who completed a 12‐week double‐blind study and its 52‐week open‐label extension or a separate 54‐week open‐label study were enrolled in this ongoing phase 3 open‐label, multinational study (NCT00660673). Safety and efficacy assessments were collected every 6 months. Results: Mean total duration of exposure to levodopa‐carbidopa intestinal gel was 4.1 years (range, 1.2 to 6.9 years). The overall discontinuation rate was 34% (average annual discontinuation rate, 10%). Although most patients (94%) reported an adverse event, the rate of adverse events decreased over time; 53% experienced a serious adverse event. Of patients in this extension study, 54% required jejunal tube replacement during the study, and 37% required percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement. Most patients were on levodopa monotherapy. Patients maintained reductions in “off” time and increases in mean “on” time without dyskinesia from initial levodopa‐carbidopa intestinal gel infusion to he study end point (P < 0.001; n = 81). Activities of daily living and quality‐of‐life assessments demonstrated significant improvements that persisted through the study. Conclusions: This long‐term study demonstrates sustained and clinically meaningful benefits from levodopa‐carbidopa intestinal gel in advanced PD patients. Although adverse event rates decreased over time, vigilance is required for device‐related complications and adverse events. © 2018 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society     

Intrajejunal levodopa infusion in Parkinson's disease: A pilot multicenter study of effects on nonmotor symptoms and quality of life

Switching from oral medications to continuous infusion of levodopa/carbidopa gel reduces motor complications in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), but effects on nonmotor symptoms (NMSs) are unknown. In this prospective open‐label observational study, we report the effects of intrajejunal levodopa/carbidopa gel infusion on NMS in PD based on standard assessments utilizing the nonmotor symptoms scale (NMSS) along with the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS 3 motor and 4 complications) and quality of life (QoL) using the Parkinson's disease questionnaire (PDQ‐8). Twenty‐two advanced PD patients (mean age 58.6 years, duration of disease 15.3 years) were followed for 6 months. A statistically significant beneficial effect was shown in six of the nine domains of the NMSS: cardiovascular, sleep/fatigue, attention/memory, gastrointestinal, urinary, and miscellaneous (including pain and dribbling) and for the total score of this scale (NMSST) paralleling improvement of motor symptoms (UPDRS 3 motor and 4 complications in “best on” state) and dyskinesias/motor fluctuations. In addition, significant improvements were found using the Parkinson's disease sleep scale (PDSS) and the PDQ‐8 (QoL). The improvement in PDQ‐8 scores correlated highly significantly with the changes in NMSST, whereas a moderately strong correlation was observed with UPDRS changes. This is the first demonstration that a levodopa‐based continuous dopaminergic stimulation is beneficial for NMS and health‐related quality of life in PD in addition to the reduction of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society     

Levodopa response differs in Parkinson's motor subtypes: A task‐based effective connectivity study

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a circuit‐level disorder with clinically‐determined motor subtypes. Despite evidence suggesting each subtype may have different pathophysiology, few neuroimaging studies have examined levodopa‐induced differences in neural activation between tremor dominant (TD) and postural instability/gait difficulty (PIGD) subtype patients during a motor task. The goal of this functional MRI (fMRI) study was to examine task‐induced activation and connectivity in the cortico‐striatal‐thalamo‐cortical motor circuit in healthy controls, TD patients, and PIGD patients before and after levodopa administration. Fourteen TD and 12 PIGD cognitively‐intact patients and 21 age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls completed a right‐hand, paced tapping fMRI paradigm. Collectively, PD patients off medication (OFF) showed hypoactivation of the motor cortex relative to healthy controls, even when controlling for performance. After levodopa intake, the PIGD patients had significantly increased activation in the left putamen compared with TD patients and healthy controls. Psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed that levodopa increased effective connectivity between the posterior putamen and other areas of the motor circuit during tapping in TD patients, but not in PIGD patients. This novel, levodopa‐induced difference in the neural responses between PD motor subtypes may have significant implications for elucidating the mechanisms underlying the distinct phenotypic manifestations and enabling the classification of motor subtypes objectively using fMRI.     

A polysomnographic study in parkinsonian patients treated with intestinal levodopa infusion

Sleep disorders are very common in advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) and have a significant negative impact on the quality of life of patients. Questionnaire-based studies suggest that sleep quality might improve following levodopa–carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) infusion. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of LCIG infusion and subsequent oral medication changes on polysomnography (PSG) and sleep symptoms in advanced PD patients. Eleven PD patients underwent PSG at baseline and after 3.8 ± 1.2 months of LCIG treatment. LCIG infusion therapy was halted during PSG. Patients were assessed with the Unified-PD-rating-Scale and completed the PD-Sleep-Scale-version-2 (PDSS-2), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the RBD single question. Subjective sleep quality improved in all patients. PSG showed a reduction of the number of awakenings in sleep, a trend towards a lower apnea–hypopnea index and no change in sleep latency, total sleep time and sleep efficiency. There was a positive correlation between the number of awakenings and PDSS-2 scores for “difficulty staying asleep”, “muscle cramps of arms or legs” and “urge to move arms or legs”. Motor complications and activities of daily living improved with LCIG. Subjective sleep quality improved significantly and the PSG study showed a less fragmented sleep pattern in advanced PD patients treated with LCIG infusion.     

Improvements in nocturnal symptoms with ropinirole prolonged release in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease

Background: The 24‐week, double‐blind Efficacy and Safety Evaluation in PD–Adjunct (EASE‐PD Adjunct) study randomized patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) suboptimally controlled with levodopa to once‐daily placebo or adjunctive ropinirole prolonged release (2–24 mg/day). We investigated the effect of ropinirole prolonged release on nocturnal symptoms in these patients. Methods: Total and grouped item PD Sleep Scale (PDSS) scores were analyzed post hoc in patients with baseline PDSS total scores ≤ 100 (troublesome nocturnal symptoms) and >100. Results: Baseline PDSS total score was ≤ 100 in 93 of 198 (47%) and 89 of 189 (47%) patients receiving ropinirole prolonged release and placebo, respectively; this subgroup displayed evidence at baseline of greater daily awake ‘off’ time, reduced night‐time sleep and worse quality of life, than the PDSS >100 subgroup. Significant improvements with ropinirole prolonged release versus placebo in PDSS score from baseline to Week 24 last observation carried forward were observed for those with baseline PDSS ≤ 100 [adjusted mean treatment difference 9.0 (95% CI: 2.76, 15.33; P = 0.0051)], but not >100. The PDSS ≤ 100 subgroup demonstrated treatment benefits for PDSS groupings of motor symptoms on waking and global quality of sleep. Changes in daytime sleepiness were similar between treatment groups. The PDSS >100 subgroup demonstrated significant treatment benefit for global quality of sleep. The unadjusted odds ratio for a positive response with ropinirole prolonged release relative to placebo, for the PDSS ≤ 100 subgroup, was 2.90 (95% CI: 1.42, 5.95, P = 0.004). Conclusions: Once‐daily ropinirole prolonged release improves nocturnal symptoms in patients with advanced PD not optimally controlled with levodopa who suffer troublesome nocturnal disturbance.     

Quality of life in early Parkinson's disease treated with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone

We aimed to investigate whether treatment with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone when compared with levodopa/carbidopa improves quality of life in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with no or minimal, nondisabling motor fluctuations. This is a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind study. One hundred eighty‐four patients on 3 to 4 equal doses of 100/25 to 200/50 mg levodopa/carbidopa or levodopa/benserazide, 0 to 3 hours of nondisabling OFF time over a 48 hour period and no dyskinesia were randomized to levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone or levodopa/carbidopa treatment for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was quality of life as assessed by the PDQ‐8. Secondary outcome measures were the UPDRS parts I–IV, and the Wearing Off Card. Treatment with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone resulted in significantly greater improvements in PDQ‐8 scores compared to treatment with levodopa/carbidopa (mean difference 1.4 points, P = 0.021). Statistically significant improvements were seen predominantly in nonmotor domains (depression, personal relationships, communication, stigma, all P < 0.05; dressing P = 0.056). Patients who were randomly assigned to levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone also showed significantly greater improvement in UPDRS part II scores (P = 0.032) with UPDRS part III scores showing borderline significance. Differences in UPDRS parts I and IV and Wearing Off Card scores were not significant. Treatment with levodopa/carbidopa/entacapone results in improved quality of life compared with levodopa/carbidopa in PD patients with mild or minimal, nondisabling motor fluctuations. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society     

Neural substrates of levodopa‐responsive gait disorders and freezing in advanced Parkinson's disease: A kinesthetic imagery approach

Gait disturbances, including freezing of gait, are frequent and disabling symptoms of Parkinson's disease. They often respond poorly to dopaminergic treatments. Although recent studies have shed some light on their neural correlates, their modulation by dopaminergic treatment remains quite unknown. Specifically, the influence of levodopa on the networks involved in motor imagery (MI) of parkinsonian gait has not been directly studied, comparing the off and on medication states in the same patients. We therefore conducted an [H₂¹⁵0] Positron emission tomography study in eight advanced parkinsonian patients (mean disease duration: 12.3 ± 3.8 years) presenting with levodopa‐responsive gait disorders and FoG, and eight age‐matched healthy subjects. All participants performed three tasks (MI of gait, visual imagery and a control task). Patients were tested off, after an overnight withdrawal of all antiparkinsonian treatment, and on medication, during consecutive mornings. The order of conditions was counterbalanced between subjects and sessions. Results showed that imagined gait elicited activations within motor and frontal associative areas, thalamus, basal ganglia and cerebellum in controls. Off medication, patients mainly activated premotor‐parietal and pontomesencephalic regions. Levodopa increased activation in motor regions, putamen, thalamus, and cerebellum, and reduced premotor‐parietal and brainstem involvement. Areas activated when patients are off medication may represent compensatory mechanisms. The recruitment of these accessory circuits has also been reported for upper‐limb movements in Parkinson's disease, suggesting a partly overlapping pathophysiology between imagined levodopa‐responsive gait disorders and appendicular signs. Our results also highlight a possible cerebellar contribution in the pathophysiology of parkinsonian gait disorders through kinesthetic imagery. Hum Brain Mapp 36:959–980, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel infusion long‐term therapy in advanced Parkinson’s disease

Background: Infusion of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (Duodopa^®; Abbott) was introduced in Sweden in 1991 as an experimental treatment in advanced Parkinson’s disease and obtained EU approval in 2004. There is compelling evidence for short‐term use of this treatment; however, long‐term data are scarce. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was performed. The primary objective was to assess the duration of treatment for all Swedish patients starting long‐term levodopa/carbidopa gel therapy between January 1991 and June 2008. Secondary aims were to study demographics, treatment with anti‐Parkinson’s disease drugs and other concomitant medications, and reasons for discontinuation of levodopa/carbidopa gel. Results: Of 150 identified patients, 135 were included in the study. On average, patients were 49 years at diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease and 63 years when infusion therapy was initiated. The median treatment time on infusion was 3.4 years (range, 0–16 years). The restricted mean treatment time was nearly 8 years; 81 patients were still on treatment at the end of the study. Levodopa was used as monotherapy in a majority of patients. Dosage of the drug was stable over time. Thirty‐one patients discontinued infusion prior to the cutoff date and 23 patients died. Device‐related problems were the most common reason for discontinuation. Patients were more likely to discontinue infusion therapy before 2000. The year of infusion initiation was significantly earlier in the dropout group compared with a matched group of continuing patients. Conclusions: Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel infusion is a long‐term treatment alternative in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease.     

Medication impairs probabilistic classification learning in Parkinson's disease

In Parkinson's disease (PD), it is possible that tonic increase of dopamine associated with levodopa medication overshadows phasic release of dopamine, which is essential for learning. Thus while the motor symptoms of PD are improved with levodopa medication, learning would be disrupted. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effect of levodopa medication on learning on the weather prediction task (WPT), which involves probabilistic classification learning. 11 PD patients and 13 matched controls completed 200 trials of the WPT, with the patients either on or off their usual levodopa medication. Consistent with prior studies, when PD patients were assessed on medication, overall WPT performance was significantly worse than controls. However, when these patients were studied following withdrawal from medication, overall performance was equivalent to controls, and significantly better than when on medication. The significant deterioration of learning on the WPT in PD patients when on compared to off medication supports the proposal that tonic increase of dopamine with dopaminergic medication masks phasic changes in dopamine release essential for learning. These results highlight the need for careful ‘titration’ of dopaminergic medication to produce the desired improvement of the motor symptoms without the associated detrimental effects on cognition and learning.     

A Double‐Blind,Randomized, Placebo and Active‐Controlled Study of Nebicapone for the Treatment of Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson's Disease

To determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of nebicapone, a new catechol‐O‐methyltransferase inhibitor for the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease (PD), we conducted a multicenter, randomized, 8‐week double‐blind, placebo‐ and active‐controlled, parallel‐group study comparing nebicapone 50 mg, 100 mg, or 150 mg, entacapone 200 mg (active control) or placebo administered concomitantly with levodopa/carbidopa or levodopa/benserazide. Two hundred and fifty‐two PD patients with motor fluctuations treated with levodopa/carbidopa or levodopa/benserazide (4–8 daily doses) were enrolled and 250 patients were eligible for intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis on the basis of having at least one efficacy assessment. The primary endpoint was 8‐week change from baseline in absolute “Off” time duration noted in self‐scoring diaries. At 8 weeks of treatment the mean daily “Off” time decreased significantly compared to placebo for nebicapone 150 mg (?106 min; 95%CI: ?192; ?21) and entacapone 200 mg (?81 min; 95%CI: ?142; ?19). The decrease in “Off” time with nebicapone 50 mg or 100 mg did not reach statistical significance. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were reported by 32% to 49% of patients in any treatment group, with no observed dose relationship in the nebicapone groups. Clinically relevant elevations in aspartate transaminase (AST) and/or alanine transaminase (ALT) were observed in 4 of 46 patients with the nebicapone 150 mg dose. The results of this study show that nebicapone 150 mg is efficacious for the treatment of motor fluctuations in PD patients. However, the risk of increasing liver transaminases and its clinically relevance deserves further evaluation.     

Levodopa inhibits habit-learning in Parkinson’s disease

Mixed dopaminergic medication, comprising dopamine agonists and levodopa, may affect habit-learning in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, the specific impact of levodopa on this effect is unknown. We assessed habit-learning in 20 non-demented PD-patients both with and without levodopa. We observed intact habit-learning in PD-patients OFF-medication. In contrast, the administration of 200 mg of levodopa impaired habit-learning. We conclude that potential deficits in habit-learning in PD may be attributed to the intake of levodopa.     

Selecting deep brain stimulation or infusion therapies in advanced Parkinson’s disease: an evidence-based review

Motor complications in Parkinson’s disease (PD) result from the short half-life and irregular plasma fluctuations of oral levodopa. When strategies of providing more continuous dopaminergic stimulation by adjusting oral medication fail, patients may be candidates for one of three device-aided therapies: deep brain stimulation (DBS), continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion, or continuous duodenal/jejunal levodopa/carbidopa pump infusion (DLI). These therapies differ in their invasiveness, side-effect profile, and the need for nursing care. So far, very few comparative studies have evaluated the efficacy of the three device-aided therapies for specific motor problems in advanced PD. As a result, neurologists currently lack guidance as to which therapy could be most appropriate for a particular PD patient. A group of experts knowledgeable in all three therapies reviewed the currently available literature for each treatment and identified variables of clinical relevance for choosing one of the three options such as type of motor problems, age, and cognitive and psychiatric status. For each scenario, pragmatic and (if available) evidence-based recommendations are provided as to which patients could be candidates for either DBS, DLI, or subcutaneous apomorphine.     

Randomized double-blind cross-over study of Sinemet-controlled release (CR4 50/200) versus Sinemet 25/100 in Parkinson's disease

Sinemet-controlled release (CR4) consisting of 50 mg carbidopa/200 mg levodopa was compared with Sinemet 25/100 in 24 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients during a 16-week double-blind cross-over study. The mean age of the patients was 66.2 years, their mean duration of PD was 9.3 years. All of the patients had response fluctuations consisting mainly of the 'wearing-off' phenomenon. Some of the patients also experienced the 'on-off' phenomenon. All patients were evaluated using the unified Parkinson disease rating scale. The following significant differences were noted on Sinemet CR4. More patients noted a decrease in dyskinesias and response fluctuations; more patients experienced a decrease in stage when 'on'; more patients were 'on' longer during the day, and more patients were globally improved. The mean number of doses per day were significantly less on Sinemet CR4 (mean 5.0, range 3-8) than on Sinemet 25/100 (mean 6.2, range 4-11 doses/day). The mean dose of levodopa in Sinemet CR4 was 1,186 +/- 458 mg and the mean dose of carbidopa was 797 +/- 115 mg. The mean dose of levodopa in Sinemet 25/100 was 873 +/- 304 mg and the mean dose of carbidopa was 218 +/- 76 mg. This study indicates that Sinemet CR4 is a useful addition for patients with response fluctuations.     

Unmasking levodopa resistance in Parkinson's disease

Some motor and nonmotor features associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) do not seem to respond well to levodopa (or other forms of dopaminergic medication) or appear to become resistant to levodopa treatment with disease progression and longer disease duration. In this narrative review, we elaborate on this issue of levodopa resistance in PD. First, we discuss the possibility of pseudoresistance, which refers to dopamine‐sensitive symptoms or signs that falsely appear to be (or have become) resistant to levodopa, when in fact other mechanisms are at play, resulting in suboptimal dopaminergic efficacy. Examples include interindividual differences in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics and underdosing because of dose‐limiting side effects or because of levodopa phobia. Moreover, pseudoresistance can emerge as not all features of PD respond adequately to the same dosage of levodopa. Second, we address that for several motor features (eg, freezing of gait or tremor) and several nonmotor features (eg, specific cognitive functions), the response to levodopa is fairly complex, with a combination of levodopa‐responsive, levodopa‐resistant, and even levodopa‐induced characteristics. A possible explanation relates to the mixed presence of underlying dopaminergic and nondopaminergic brain lesions. We suggest that clinicians take these possibilities into account before concluding that symptoms or signs of PD are totally levodopa resistant. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society     

Periodic leg movements and REM sleep without atonia in Parkinson's disease with camptocormia

Camptocormia (a flexion of the trunk that only appears when standing or walking) affects a minority of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). As it responds poorly to levodopa and is associated with reduced midbrain and pons volume, it may result from non‐dopaminergic, brainstem lesions. As several sleep abnormalities in PD also result from non‐dopaminergic brainstem lesions, we monitored sleep in 24 non‐demented PD patients with (n = 12) and without (n = 12) camptocormia and in 12 controls. Nearly half (42%) patients with camptocormia had abnormal periodic leg movement indices (>15/h), versus 17% patients without camptocormia and 8% of controls (p = 0.02). In addition, the percentage of enhanced muscle activity during REM sleep (measured on the chin and on the limb muscles) tended to be higher in patients with than without camptocormia (51 ± 39% vs. 20 ± 25%, p = 0.06). The other sleep and REM sleep characteristics (sleep and REM sleep onset latencies, sleep time and sleep stage percentages, REMs density, arousal, and apnea‐hypopnea indices) were not different between these two PD groups. Lesions causing this axial dystonia may spare the sleep systems but affect the control of movements during sleep. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society     

A double-blind crossover comparison of Sinemet CR4 and standard Sinemet 25/100 in patients with Parkinson''s disease and fluctuating motor performance.

Fourteen Parkinsonian patients with fluctuations in therapeutic response to levodopa completed a double-blind, crossover trial of controlled-release levodopa/carbidopa (Sinemet CR4) vs standard Sinemet 25/100 (STD). Significant increases in mean interdose interval and per cent of the waking day spent "on", as well as reductions in the number of daily medication doses and number of "off" episodes were noted. In the double-blind part of the study, relative to open treatment with STD, ten patients rated themselves as improved while taking CR4, whereas only three considered themselves improved with STD. Difficulties using CR4 included an increased "lag-time" to the onset of antiparkinson effect, a tendency to produce increasingly severe dyskinesia late in the day, and a somewhat lessened predictability of motor response. Nonetheless, since the overall level of motor function through the day was equal to or better than that attained with STD, but with fewer medication administrations, Sinemet CR4 should prove a useful antiparkinsonian agent.