Spectral entropy and bispectral index as measures of the electroencephalographic effects of sevoflurane

BACKGROUND: Recently, entropy algorithms have been proposed as electroencephalographic measures of anesthetic drug effects. Datex-Ohmeda (Helsinki, Finland) introduced the Entropy Module, a new electroencephalographic monitor designed for measuring depth of anesthesia. The monitor calculates a state entropy (SE) computed over the frequency range of 0.8-32 Hz and a response entropy (RE) computed over the frequency range of 0.8-47 Hz. The authors investigated the dose-response relation of SE and RE during sevoflurane anesthesia in comparison with the Bispectral Index (BIS). METHODS: Sixteen patients were studied without surgical stimulus. Anesthesia was induced by sevoflurane inhalation with a tight-fitting facemask. Sevoflurane concentrations were increased and subsequently decreased and increased two to four times until the measurement was stopped and patients were intubated for surgery. The performances of SE, RE, and BIS to predict the estimated sevoflurane effect site concentration, obtained by simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling, were compared by calculating the correlation coefficients and the prediction probability. RESULTS: State entropy, RE, and BIS values decreased continuously over the observed concentration range of sevoflurane. Correlation coefficients were slightly but not significantly better for entropy parameters (0.87 +/- 0.09 and 0.86 +/- 0.10 for SE and RE, respectively) than for BIS (0.85 +/- 0.12). Calculating the prediction probability confirmed these results with a prediction probability of 0.84 +/- 0.05 and 0.82 +/- 0.06 for SE and RE, respectively, and 0.80 +/- 0.06 for BIS. CONCLUSION: State entropy and RE seem to be useful electroencephalographic measures of sevoflurane drug effect.     

Spectral Entropy as a Measure of Hypnosis in Children

Background: The Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Entropy Module (Datex-Ohmeda Division, Instrumentarium Corp., Helsinki, Finland), using time-frequency balanced Spectral Entropy, is a novel tool for monitoring the hypnotic state during anesthesia. The Entropy Module produces two values, State Entropy (SE) and Response Entropy (RE), and in adults, it has been shown to measure reliably the hypnotic effects of various drugs. In children, Spectral Entropy has been only preliminary studied. The authors' aim was to study Spectral Entropy as a marker of hypnotic state during general anesthesia in infants and children.

Methods: Twenty infants (aged 1 month-1 yr) and 40 children (aged 1-15 yr) were anesthetized for surgery using standardized sevoflurane-nitrous oxide-based anesthesia. The relationships between SE, RE, or Bispectral Index (BIS) and (1) a modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale, (2) non-steady state end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane, (3) steady state end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane, and (4) hemodynamic values were calculated using prediction probability, nonlinear regression, and correlation coefficients, as appropriate. The performances of SE, RE, and BIS were compared.

Results: The prediction probability values (+/- SEM) of SE, RE, and BIS versus the modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale in the induction phase were 0.83 +/- 0.06, 0.88 +/- 0.06, and 0.87 +/- 0.08 for children and 0.76 +/- 0.08,0.79 +/- 0.08, and 0.73 +/- 0.10 for infants; values in the emergence phase were 0.68 +/- 0.05, 0.74 +/- 0.04, and 0.64 +/- 0.05 for children and 0.64 +/- 0.07, 0.69 +/- 0.06, and 0.72 +/- 0.06 for infants, respectively. SE, RE, and BIS values were inversely proportionally related to the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane for children, but for infants, the correlation was much less clear. No significant correlations were found between SE, RE, or BIS values and the hemodynamic values.     

Spectral entropy as a measure of hypnosis in children

BACKGROUND: The Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Entropy Module (Datex-Ohmeda Division, Instrumentarium Corp., Helsinki, Finland), using time-frequency balanced Spectral Entropy, is a novel tool for monitoring the hypnotic state during anesthesia. The Entropy Module produces two values, State Entropy (SE) and Response Entropy (RE), and in adults, it has been shown to measure reliably the hypnotic effects of various drugs. In children, Spectral Entropy has been only preliminary studied. The authors' aim was to study Spectral Entropy as a marker of hypnotic state during general anesthesia in infants and children. METHODS: Twenty infants (aged 1 month-1 yr) and 40 children (aged 1-15 yr) were anesthetized for surgery using standardized sevoflurane-nitrous oxide-based anesthesia. The relationships between SE, RE, or Bispectral Index (BIS) and (1) a modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale, (2) non-steady state end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane, (3) steady state end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane, and (4) hemodynamic values were calculated using prediction probability, nonlinear regression, and correlation coefficients, as appropriate. The performances of SE, RE, and BIS were compared. RESULTS: The prediction probability values (+/- SEM) of SE, RE, and BIS versus the modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale in the induction phase were 0.83 +/- 0.06, 0.88 +/- 0.06, and 0.87 +/- 0.08 for children and 0.76 +/- 0.08,0.79 +/- 0.08, and 0.73 +/- 0.10 for infants; values in the emergence phase were 0.68 +/- 0.05, 0.74 +/- 0.04, and 0.64 +/- 0.05 for children and 0.64 +/- 0.07, 0.69 +/- 0.06, and 0.72 +/- 0.06 for infants, respectively. SE, RE, and BIS values were inversely proportionally related to the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane for children, but for infants, the correlation was much less clear. No significant correlations were found between SE, RE, or BIS values and the hemodynamic values. CONCLUSIONS: Spectral Entropy may be a useful tool for measuring the level of hypnosis in anesthetized children and seems to perform as well as BIS. In infants, the clinical usefulness of both these electroencephalogram-derived methods must be evaluated in further controlled studies.     

Spectral entropy and bispectral index as measures of the electroencephalographic effects of propofol

Recently, Datex-Ohmeda introduced the Entropy Moduletrade mark for measuring depth of anesthesia. Based on the Shannon entropy of the electroencephalogram, state entropy (SE) and response entropy (RE) are computed. We investigated the dose-response relationship of SE and RE during propofol anesthesia in comparison with the Bispectral Indextrade mark (BIS). Twenty patients were studied without surgical stimulus. Anesthesia was induced by a constant propofol infusion of 2000 mg/h (451 +/- 77 microg x min(-1) x kg(-1)) via a large forearm vein. Propofol was infused until substantial burst suppression occurred (more than 50%) or mean arterial blood pressure decreased to <60 mm Hg. Hereafter, infusions were stopped until recovery of BIS values up to 60 was reached. Subsequently, the constant propofol infusion of 2000 mg/h was restarted to increase depth of anesthesia and again decreased (infusion was stopped) within the BIS value range of 40-60. The coefficient of determination (R2) and the prediction probability (P(K)) were calculated to evaluate the performance of SE, RE, and BIS to predict changing propofol effect-site concentrations. R2 values for SE, RE, and BIS of 0.88 +/- 0.08, 0.89 +/- 0.07, and 0.92 +/- 0.06, respectively, were similar. The calculated P(K) values, however, revealed a significant difference between SE and RE compared with BIS, with P(K) = 0.77 +/- 0.09, 0.76 +/- 0.10, and 0.84 +/- 0.06, respectively. BIS seems to show slight advantages in predicting propofol effect-site concentrations compared with SE and RE, as measured by P(K) but not as measured by R2.     

Time-frequency balanced spectral entropy as a measure of anesthetic drug effect in central nervous system during sevoflurane, propofol, and thiopental anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Time-frequency balanced spectral entropy of electroencephalogram (EEG) and frontal electromyogram (FEMG) is a novel measure of hypnosis during anesthesia. Two Entropy parameters are described: Response entropy (RE) is calculated from EEG and FEMG; and State Entropy (SE) is calculated mainly from EEG. This study was performed to validate their performance during transition from consciousness to unconsciousness under different anesthetic agents. METHODS: Response entropy, SE [S/5 Entropy Module, M-ENTROPY (later in text: Entropy), Datex-Ohmeda Division, Instrumentarium Corp., Helsinki, Finland] and BIS (BIS XP, A-2000, Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA) data were collected from 70 patients; 30 anesthetized with propofol 2 mg kg-1, 20 with sevoflurane inhalation, and 20 with thiopental 5 mg kg-1. Loss and regaining of consciousness (LOC, ROC) was tested every 10 s, and sensitivity, specificity, and prediction probability (Pk) were calculated. Behavior of the indices was studied. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and Pk values for consciousness were high and similar for all indices. During regaining of consciousness after propofol bolus, RE, SE, and BIS values recovered by 81 +/- 22%, 75 +/- 26%, and 59 +/- 18% (mean +/- SD), respectively, from the minimum relative to their baseline. After thiopental bolus, RE, SE, and BIS values recovered by 86+/-21%, 88 +/- 13%, and 63 +/- 14%, respectively. The relative rise was higher in RE and SE compared with BIS (P < 0.01). During deep levels of hypnosis, RE and SE decreased monotonously as a function of burst suppression ratio, while BIS showed biphasic behavior. On average, RE indicated emergence from anesthesia 11 s earlier than SE, and 12.4 s earlier than BIS. CONCLUSIONS: All indices, RE, SE, and BIS, distinguished excellently between conscious and unconscious states during propofol, sevoflurane, and thiopental anesthesia. During burst suppression, Entropy parameters RE and SE, but not BIS, behave monotonously. During regaining of consciousness after a thiopental or propofol bolus, RE and SE values recovered significantly closer to their baseline values than did BIS. Response entropy indicates emergence from anesthesia earlier than SE or BIS.     

Evaluation of the sedation level with propofol with electroencephalographic Entropy in comparison with bispectral index monitor

BACKGROUND: Entropy, a newly available electroencephalographic monitor, demonstrates two parameters, response entropy (RE) and state entropy (SE). The aim of this study is to compare RE and SE with bispectral index (BIS) during anesthetic induction with propofol. METHODS: Fifteen patients received target controlled infusion of propofol starting at 3 microg x ml(-1). We measured RE, SE and BIS and recorded effect-site concentrations of propofol at three sedation levels: VR1; conscious state before infusion of propofol, VR2; no response to verbal command, and VR3; no response to verbal command and shaking. Spearman rank correlations and prediction probability for sedation level were analyzed. RESULTS: Effect-site concentrations of propofol at VR1, VR2, and VR3 were 0, 1.8 +/- 0.7, and 2.4 +/- 0.7, respectively. All three parameters showed significant correlations with sedation levels. Prediction probability values of SE, RE, and BIS were 0.905, 0.894, and 0.890, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Response entropy and SE can provide similar information as BIS about the sedation level with propofol.     

Comparative evaluation of the Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Entropy Module and the Bispectral Index monitor during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Different analytical concepts were introduced to quantify the changes of the electroencephalogram. The Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Entropy Module (Datex-Ohmeda Division, Instrumentarium Corp., Helsinki, Finland) was the first commercial monitor based on the entropy generating two indices, the state entropy (SE) and the response entropy (RE). The aim of the current study was to compare the accuracy of SE and RE with the Bispectral Index(R) monitor (BIS(R); Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA) during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia. METHODS: The authors investigated 20 female patients during minor gynecologic surgery. SE, RE, BIS, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and sedation level were recorded every 20 s during stepwise increase (target-controlled infusion, 0.5 microg/ml) of propofol until the patients lost response. Five minutes after loss of response, remifentanil infusion (0.4 microg . kg(-1) . min(-1)) was started. Spearman correlation coefficient and prediction probability were calculated for sedation levels with SE, RE, BIS, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate. The ability of the investigated parameters to distinguish between the anesthesia steps awake versus loss of response, awake versus anesthesia, anesthesia versus first reaction, and anesthesia versus extubation was analyzed with the prediction probability. RESULTS: SE correlates best with sedation levels, but no significant differences of the prediction probability values among SE, RE, and BIS were found. The prediction probability for all investigated steps of anesthesia did not show significant differences among SE, RE, and BIS. SE, RE, and BIS were superior to mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate. CONCLUSION: SE, RE, and BIS revealed similar information about the level of sedation and allowed the authors to distinguish between different steps of anesthesia. Both monitors provided useful additional information for the anesthesiologist.     

Comparative Evaluation of the Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Entropy Module and the Bispectral Index® Monitor during Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia

Background: Different analytical concepts were introduced to quantify the changes of the electroencephalogram. The Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Entropy Module (Datex-Ohmeda Division, Instrumentarium Corp., Helsinki, Finland) was the first commercial monitor based on the entropy generating two indices, the state entropy (SE) and the response entropy (RE). The aim of the current study was to compare the accuracy of SE and RE with the Bispectral Index(R) monitor (BIS(R); Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA) during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.

Methods: The authors investigated 20 female patients during minor gynecologic surgery. SE, RE, BIS, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and sedation level were recorded every 20 s during stepwise increase (target-controlled infusion, 0.5 [mu]g/ml) of propofol until the patients lost response. Five minutes after loss of response, remifentanil infusion (0.4 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) was started. Spearman correlation coefficient and prediction probability were calculated for sedation levels with SE, RE, BIS, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate. The ability of the investigated parameters to distinguish between the anesthesia steps awake versus loss of response, awake versus anesthesia, anesthesia versus first reaction, and anesthesia versus extubation was analyzed with the prediction probability.

Results: SE correlates best with sedation levels, but no significant differences of the prediction probability values among SE, RE, and BIS were found. The prediction probability for all investigated steps of anesthesia did not show significant differences among SE, RE, and BIS. SE, RE, and BIS were superior to mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate.     

熵指数监测全麻患者镇静水平的准确性

目的 评价反应熵和状态熵监测全麻患者镇静水平的准确性.方法 择期行腹部手术患者20例,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,入室后监测反应熵(RE)、状态熵(SE)及脑电双频谱指数(BIS),静脉注射异丙酚、维库溴铵和芬太尼麻醉诱导,气管插管后机械通气,吸入七氟烷、间断静脉注射维库溴铵和芬太尼维持麻醉.分别于入室时、意识消失前10min、意识消失即刻、气管插管时、手术1 h、意识恢复前10 min、意识恢复即刻、拔管后10 min时记录RE、SE和BIS.结果 RE、SE和BIS在意识改变前后差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05),RE、SE和BIS判断意识消失的临界值分别为76、73和68,灵敏度分别为94%、95%和92%,特异度分别为92%、94%和9l%,临界值判断意识消失的准确度分别为93%、95%、94%;判断意识恢复的临界值分别为82、75和70,灵敏度分别为95%、95%和91%,特异度分别为93%、96%和93%,临界值判断意识恢复的准确度分别为98%、96%和97%.结论 熵指数能够准确地监测全麻患者镇静水平.     

Spectral entropy as an electroencephalographic measure of anesthetic drug effect: a comparison with bispectral index and processed midlatency auditory evoked response

BACKGROUND: The authors compared the behavior of two calculations of electroencephalographic spectral entropy, state entropy (SE) and response entropy (RE), with the A-Line ARX Index (AAI) and the Bispectral Index (BIS) and as measures of anesthetic drug effect. They compared the measures for baseline variability, burst suppression, and prediction probability. They also developed pharmacodynamic models relating SE, RE, AAI, and BIS to the calculated propofol effect-site concentration (Ceprop). METHODS: With institutional review board approval, the authors studied 10 patients. All patients received 50 mg/min propofol until either burst suppression greater than 80% or mean arterial pressure less than 50 mmHg was observed. SE, RE, AAI, and BIS were continuously recorded. Ceprop was calculated from the propofol infusion profile. Baseline variability, prediction of burst suppression, prediction probability, and Spearman rank correlation were calculated for SE, RE, AAI, and BIS. The relations between Ceprop and the electroencephalographic measures of drug effect were estimated using nonlinear mixed effect modeling. RESULTS: Baseline variability was lowest when using SE and RE. Burst suppression was most accurately detected by spectral entropy. Prediction probability and individualized Spearman rank correlation were highest for BIS and lowest for SE. Nonlinear mixed effect modeling generated reasonable models relating all four measures to Ceprop. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with BIS and AAI, both SE and RE seem to be useful electroencephalographic measures of anesthetic drug effect, with low baseline variability and accurate burst suppression prediction. The ability of the measures to predict Ceprop was best for BIS.     

Spectral Entropy as an Electroencephalographic Measure of Anesthetic Drug Effect: A Comparison with Bispectral Index and Processed Midlatency Auditory Evoked Response

Background: The authors compared the behavior of two calculations of electroencephalographic spectral entropy, state entropy (SE) and response entropy (RE), with the A-Line(R) ARX Index (AAI) and the Bispectral Index (BIS) and as measures of anesthetic drug effect. They compared the measures for baseline variability, burst suppression, and prediction probability. They also developed pharmacodynamic models relating SE, RE, AAI, and BIS to the calculated propofol effect-site concentration (Ceprop).

Methods: With institutional review board approval, the authors studied 10 patients. All patients received 50 mg/min propofol until either burst suppression greater than 80% or mean arterial pressure less than 50 mmHg was observed. SE, RE, AAI, and BIS were continuously recorded. Ceprop was calculated from the propofol infusion profile. Baseline variability, prediction of burst suppression, prediction probability, and Spearman rank correlation were calculated for SE, RE, AAI, and BIS. The relations between Ceprop and the electroencephalographic measures of drug effect were estimated using nonlinear mixed effect modeling.

Results: Baseline variability was lowest when using SE and RE. Burst suppression was most accurately detected by spectral entropy. Prediction probability and individualized Spearman rank correlation were highest for BIS and lowest for SE. Nonlinear mixed effect modeling generated reasonable models relating all four measures to Ceprop.     

脑电熵在麻醉深度监测中的应用现状

脑电熵是对脑电信号不规则性、无序性、不可预知性的量化指标.脑电熵(近似熵、Shannon 熵、谱熵)是临床监测麻醉深度的良好指标.Dutex-Ohmeda公司推出的EntropyTM模块是时一域平衡谱熵,它引入了状态熵(state entropy,SE)与反应熵(response entropy.RE)两个参数指标.状态熵,只是覆盖了脑电图(electroencephalogram,EEG)频率范围(0.8 Hz-32 Hz),因此主要反映大脑皮层状态;反应熵则覆盖了包括EEG 和肌电图(electromyogram,EMG)在内的频率范围(0.8 Hz-47 Hz),其数值受肌电活动的影响.在镇静监测方面,EntropyTM模块与脑电双频指数(bispectral index,BIS)监护仪对镇静水平的监测能力相似;在镇痛监测方面,反应熵可能对确定麻醉过浅及疼痛刺激所致的患者麻醉苏醒有意义.脑电熵像其他数量化脑电图一样,仍源于脑电,只是计算方法不同,因此,临床仍期待新型麻醉深度监测方法的问世.     

Isoflurane and sevoflurane decrease entropy indices more than halothane at equal MAC values

Recently, bispectral index (BIS) values were demonstrated to be different for various anesthetics as a result of differential effects on electroencephalographic (EEG) signals. Entropy is similar to the BIS monitor, as both process raw EEG to derive a number. We hypothesized that entropy may also be anesthetic agent-specific. Thirty adult patients undergoing spinal surgery were randomized to receive halothane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane. Entropy indices were recorded at various minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) values—0.5, 0.75, 1.0 and 1.5—both during wash-in and wash-out of the agent. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), response entropy (RE), and state entropy (SE) were noted. Statistical analysis was done using a one-way analysis-ofvariance test. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Ten patients in each group completed the study. The demographics and baseline values of HR, MAP, RE, and SE were comparable in all three groups. During the study period, for a given MAC value, both RE and SE remained low in the isoflurane and sevoflurane groups compared to the halothane group. For a given MAC, the RE and SE were comparable during wash-in and wash-out phases. Halothane produced higher entropy values as compared to isoflurane and sevoflurane at equivalent MAC levels.     

State entropy and bispectral index: correlation with end tidal sevoflurane concentrations

AIM: Aim of this study was to evaluate the difference between the correlations of state entropy (SE) and bispectral index (BIS) with different end tidal concentrations (Et) of sevoflurane. METHODS: A total of 40 ASA I/II patients submitted to abdominal surgery were enrolled in the study. After premedication with fentanyl, anesthesia was induced with propofol and atracurium and maintained with sevoflurane in oxygen and air. The values of Et sevoflurane, SE and BIS were recorded during the operating room stay. The mean Et sevoflurane was calculated and the correlations of SE and BIS with Et sevoflurane were determined with Pearson test separately at values of Et sevoflurane below and higher the mean Et sevoflurane. Student's t-test was used to verify if the difference between the correlations was significant (P<0.05). RESULTS: The mean Et sevoflurane was 1.5%. During anesthesia the correlation with Et sevoflurane was -0.75 for SE and -0.70 for BIS. At Et sevoflurane higher than 1.5% the correlation with Et sevoflurane was -0.41 for SE and -0.14 for BIS. At Et sevoflurane below 1.5% the correlation with Et sevoflurane was -0.65 for SE, and -0.8 for BIS. The difference between the correlations of Et sevoflurane with SE and BIS resulted statistically significant. CONCLUSION: During sevoflurane anesthesia SE shows a better correlation than BIS with Et sevoflurane. Although at low Et sevoflurane the correlation is better with BIS, at high Et sevoflurane the correlation is better with SE.     

A comparison of state and response entropy versus bispectral index values during the perioperative period

Cerebral monitoring indices are associated with a large degree of inter-patient variability and electrical signal interference during surgery. We designed this clinical study to test the hypothesis that use of the spectral entropy (Entropy) module is associated with less frequent intraoperative interference with the displayed indices than the bispectral index (BIS) monitor when used during general anesthesia with propofol and desflurane. Thirty consenting patients scheduled for major laparoscopic surgery procedures were enrolled in this prospective study. The elapsed time to obtain a baseline index value was recorded, as well as the simultaneous state entropy (SE), response entropy (RE), and BIS values at specific time intervals during the induction, maintenance, and emergence periods in patients administered a standardized general anesthetic technique. During the maintenance period, the changes in these indices were evaluated after a bolus dose of propofol (20 mg IV) and a 2% increase or decrease in the inspired concentration of desflurane. As expected, the baseline SE values were less than the RE and BIS values (88 +/- 2 versus 96 +/- 3 and 96 +/- 4, respectively). However, the SE and RE values correlated with the BIS value during the induction (r = 0.77 and 0.78, respectively) and emergence (r = 0.86 and 0.91, respectively) periods. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for detection of consciousness also indicated a similar performance of the SE (0.93 +/- 0.04) relative to the RE (0.98 +/- 0.04) and BIS (0.97 +/- 0.04). During the maintenance period, the responses to changes in propofol and desflurane concentrations were consistent with all three indices. Finally, the entropy indices were less interfered with by the electrocautery unit during the operation (12% versus 62% for the BIS monitor). Because the average selling prices of the Entropy and BIS disposable electrode strips (14.25 dollars versus 14.95 dollars USD, respectively) are comparable, we conclude that the Entropy module is a cost-equivalent alternative to the BIS monitor.     

Using Permutation Entropy to Measure the Electroencephalographic Effects of Sevoflurane

Background: Approximate entropy (AE) has been proposed as a measure of anesthetic drug effect in electroencephalographic data. Recently, a new method called permutation entropy (PE) based on symbolic dynamics was also proposed to measure the complexity in an electroencephalographic series. In this study, the AE and PE were applied to electroencephalographic recordings for revealing the effect of sevoflurane on brain activity. The dose-response relation of PE during sevoflurane anesthesia was compared with that of AE.

Methods: Nineteen patients' electroencephalographic data were collected during the induction of general anesthesia with sevoflurane. PE and AE were applied to the electroencephalographic recordings, and the performance of both measures was assessed by pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and prediction probability. To ensure an accurate complexity measure of electroencephalographic recordings, a wavelet-based preprocessor was built in advance.

Results: Both PE and AE could distinguish between the awake and anesthetized states and were highly correlated to each other (r = 0.8, P = 0.004). The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model adequately described the dose-response relation between PE and AE and sevoflurane effect site concentration. The coefficient R2 between PE and effect site concentration was 0.89 +/- 0.07 for all patients, compared with 0.60 +/- 0.14 for AE. Prediction probabilities of 0.86 +/- 0.04 and 0.79 +/- 0.09 for PE and AE showed that PE has a stronger ability to differentiate between the awake and anesthetic states.     

Application of Bispectral Index and Narcotrend index to the measurement of the electroencephalographic effects of isoflurane with and without burst suppression

BACKGROUND: The Narcotrend monitor (MonitorTechnik, Bad Bramstedt, Germany) has recently been introduced as an intraoperative monitor of anesthetic state, based on a classification scheme originally developed for visual assessment of the electroencephalogram. The authors compared the performance of the Narcotrend index (software version 4.0) to the Bispectral Index (BIS, version XP; Aspect Medical Systems, Natick, MA) as electroencephalographic measures of isoflurane drug effect during general anesthesia. METHODS: The authors observed 15 adult patients scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy with a combined epidural-isoflurane general anesthesia technique. At least 45 min after induction of general anesthesia, during a phase of constant surgical stimulation, end-tidal isoflurane concentrations were varied between 0.5 and 2.0 multiples of minimum alveolar concentration, and the BIS and the Narcotrend index were recorded. The prediction probability (PK) was calculated for the BIS and the Narcotrend index to predict isoflurane effect compartment concentration for each measure. The correlation analysis of the BIS and the Narcotrend index with the isoflurane effect compartment concentration was obtained by pharmacodynamic modeling based on two sigmoidal curves to account for the discontinuity in both indices with the onset of burst suppression. RESULTS: The prediction probabilities were indistinguishable (BIS PK = 0.72 +/- 0.07 (mean +/- SD); range, 0.61-0.84; Narcotrend index PK = 0.72 +/- 0.10; range, 0.51-0.87), as were the correlations between the electroencephalographic measures and isoflurane effect compartment concentrations (BIS R = 0.82 +/- 0.12; Narcotrend index R = 0.85 +/- 0.09). The pharmacodynamic models for the BIS and the Narcotrend index yielded nearly identical results. CONCLUSIONS: The BIS and the Narcotrend index detected the electroencephalographic effects of isoflurane equally. Combining two fractional sigmoid Emax models adequately described the data before and after the onset of burst suppression.     

Changes in the bispectral index and the spectral edge frequency 90 during different phases of anesthesia with sevoflurane

INTRODUCTION: Electroencephalographic monitoring is one of the techniques used to measure hypnosis during anesthesia. Efforts to find a means to apply this monitoring function are justified by cases of intraoperative awakening and are in the interest of guaranteeing patient welfare and controlling anesthesia. OBJECTIVES: To determine the changes in two electroencephalographic parameters, the bispectral index (BIS) and the spectral edge frequency 90 (SEF90), during the different phases of anesthesia.Patients and method. Forty-eight patients undergoing abdominal surgery were studied prospectively. Anesthesia was induced by propofol, fentanyl or sevoflurane. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and O2/N2O at a concentration of 70% to maintain BIS between 40 and 60. Variables monitored were heart rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation (with a pulse oximeter), expired CO2 partial pressure, inspired and expired sevoflurane partial pressure, esophageal temperature, SEF90 (defined as the frequency below which 90% of the power in the electroencephalogram resides) and BIS. All variables were recorded during three phases: induction, maintenance and recovery from anesthesia. We then performed an analysis of variance, with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: During induction mean BIS decreased from 95.6 to 34.7 after intubation, while SEF90 fell from 20.5 Hz to 11.9 Hz. During maintenance BIS, SEF90 and expired sevoflurane partial pressure remained constant. During recovery mean BIS increased from 59.2 to 92.3 upon extubation, and SEF90 went from 15.1 to 22.2 Hz; although heart rate increased, blood pressure did not. The mean electroencephalographic values recorded when movement occurred were 77 for BIS (range 58-96) and 18 for SEF90 (range 13-18). CONCLUSION: Electroencephalographic monitoring is useful for distinguishing between states of consciousness and unconsciousness during anesthesia, and is valid for the phases of induction and recovery. BIS values over 58 and SEF90 values over 13 may indicate inadequate hypnosis.     

Response entropy increases during painful stimulation

Frontal electromyography (FEMG) may increase during painful stimulation and indicate patient arousal. The Datex-Ohmeda Entropy Module calculates state entropy (SE) of the electroencephalogram (EEG; 0.8-32 Hz) and response entropy (RE) of EEG and FEMG (0.8-47 Hz). We determined whether RE increases above SE (RE--SE), an indication of FEMG, increase during painful stimuli and if this is related to paralysis or level of anesthesia. With the unanesthetized baseline measurement, SE was 89 +/- 2 and RE was 98 +/- 2. During paralysis and anesthesia with either 0.8% (n = 10) or 1.4% (n = 10) isoflurane, SE decreased to 63 +/- 7 and 34 +/- 14, respectively, and the RE--SE difference decreased 90%. Before recovery from paralysis, arterial catheter or head pin placement increased RE--SE above unanesthetized levels in eight patients (five treated with 0.8% and three with 1.4% isoflurane), consistent with an increase in FEMG. The elevated RE--SE difference was related to a significant increase in SE, blood pressure, and heart rate. After recovery from paralysis, tetanic stimulation of the ulnar nerve increased the RE--SE difference above unanesthetized levels in 8 of 20 patients (6 treated with 0.8% and 2 with 1.4% isoflurane). In these patients, SE increased significantly. The remaining 12 patients did not show an increase in RE--SE during tetanic stimulation and SE did not increase. We conclude that increased RE during painful stimulation was not dependent on recovery from paralysis but was seen more often in patients anesthetized with 0.8% compared with 1.4% isoflurane. This suggests that RE reflects FEMG and may be useful to identify inadequate anesthesia and patient arousal during painful stimuli.     

Application of Bispectral Index® and Narcotrend® Index to the Measurement of the Electroencephalographic Effects of Isoflurane with and without Burst Suppression

Background: The Narcotrend(R) monitor (MonitorTechnik, Bad Bramstedt, Germany) has recently been introduced as an intraoperative monitor of anesthetic state, based on a classification scheme originally developed for visual assessment of the electroencephalogram. The authors compared the performance of the Narcotrend(R) index (software version 4.0) to the Bispectral Index(R) (BIS(R), version XP; Aspect Medical Systems, Natick, MA) as electroencephalographic measures of isoflurane drug effect during general anesthesia.

Methods: The authors observed 15 adult patients scheduled to undergo radical prostatectomy with a combined epidural-isoflurane general anesthesia technique. At least 45 min after induction of general anesthesia, during a phase of constant surgical stimulation, end-tidal isoflurane concentrations were varied between 0.5 and 2.0 multiples of minimum alveolar concentration, and the BIS(R) and the Narcotrend(R) index were recorded. The prediction probability (PK) was calculated for the BIS(R) and the Narcotrend(R) index to predict isoflurane effect compartment concentration for each measure. The correlation analysis of the BIS(R) and the Narcotrend(R) index with the isoflurane effect compartment concentration was obtained by pharmacodynamic modeling based on two sigmoidal curves to account for the discontinuity in both indices with the onset of burst suppression.

Results: The prediction probabilities were indistinguishable (BIS(R) PK = 0.72 +/- 0.07 (mean +/- SD); range, 0.61-0.84; Narcotrend(R) index PK = 0.72 +/- 0.10; range, 0.51-0.87), as were the correlations between the electroencephalographic measures and isoflurane effect compartment concentrations (BIS(R) R2 = 0.82 +/- 0.12; Narcotrend(R) index R2 = 0.85 +/- 0.09). The pharmacodynamic models for the BIS(R) and the Narcotrend(R) index yielded nearly identical results.