Indirekte traumatische Zwerchfellruptur

BACKGROUND: Indirect diaphragmatic rupture (DR) is defined as acquired complete split of the diaphragm after blunt trauma and occurs in 1-5% of massively traumatized patients. The diagnosis is often difficult. However, particular trauma mechanisms and associated injuries may suggest the existence of DR. METHODS: A retrospective study was done of 21 consecutive patients from 1993 to 2004 at an university hospital. RESULTS: This study revealed a striking combination of DR with pelvic fractures (12/21, 57%). Of 19 polytraumatized patients, diagnosis was made initially in 13 (68%) and with a delay in six (32%). Right-sided injuries were common (8/21, 38%). Thus a 'protective' function of the liver does not exist. Diaphragmatic rupture can be missed in ventilated patients until extubation leads to herniation of abdominal organs into the thorax. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragmatic rupture should be excluded in all severely abdominally traumatized patients, in particular those with concomitant pelvic fracture. Computed tomography with oral contrast medium is diagnostic in most cases. Access by laparotomy should be preferred after acute trauma, since additional intra-abdominal injuries are frequent.     

Indirekte Frakturen des Fibulaschaftes

Ohne Zusammenfassung (Mit 4 Abbildungen.)     

Videolaryngoskopie versus direkte Laryngoskopie zur elektiven endotrachealen Intubation

Background

We compared the ease of viewing the glottis under direct vision during conventional laryngoscopy with the quality of indirectly viewing on a monitor during laryngoscopy with a Macintosh videolaryngoscope in a multicenter study.

Patients and methods

After ethical approval and written informed consent of 300 patients with no anticipated difficult airway, conventional laryngoscopy with a Macintosh videolaryngoscopy blade was performed and the quality of the view of the glottis was assessed and documented according to the Cormack and Lehane scoring system as modified by Yentis and Lee. Subsequently, the indirect viewing conditions on the monitor were documented without changing the position of the blade. Differences between both distributions were analyzed using the Bland-Altman Test.

Results

Videolaryngoscopy improved the laryngoscopy score by 1 grade in 72 cases, by 2 grades in 17 cases and by 3 grades in 2 cases. A relevant improvement (from grades III/IV to II) was found in 28 patients. Viewing conditions worsened in 3 cases by 1 grade, in 4 cases by 2 grades and in 3 cases by 3 grades. A statistical analysis of the data gave a bias of 0.31 and an SD bias of 0.77.The 95% confidence interval of the distribution ranged from ?1.12 to 1.81.

Conclusion

Videolaryngoscopy can lead to better viewing conditions but in rare cases it may result in worse viewing conditions.