A case of interstitial lung diseases in patient treated with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX)

FOLFOX/bevacizumab has been shown to be a promising chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced or metastatic colorectral cancer. We reported a case of intestinal lung diseases occurring in association with the use of this combination chemotherapy. The patient presented here is a 71-year-old man with lung metastasis of rectal cancer who was treated with FOLFOX4/ bevacizumab. He complained of high fever in the eleventh course of a FOLFOX4/bevacizumab regimen. Chemotherapy was stopped. But fourteen days after, he suffered from dyspnea and soon went into respiratory failure of WHO grade 3 with severe hypoxemia. He was diagnosed with interstitial pneumonitis. Corticosteroid therapy consisting of metylprednisolone(1 g/day) for tree days was significantly effective in treatment of respiratory failure. Drug-induced interstitial pneumonitis was suspected from chest X-ray and CT. We performed DLST of oxaliplatin, l-levofolinate, 5-FU and bevacizumab for him. He was positive for oxaliplatin and l-levofolinate and 5-FU, and negative for bevacizumab. Interstitial pneumonitis induced by FOLFOX/bevacizumab chemotherapy is rare, but six patients had developed, one of whom died in post-marketing surveillance. The possibility of interstitial pneumonitis should always be considered when a patient presents with a respiratory disorder while undergoing systemic chemotherapy.     

Interstitial lung disease in a patient treated with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFOX) for metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

Oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (FOLFOX) is a common chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced colorectal cancer. Here, we present a case of interstitial lung disease associated with FOLFOX therapy.

Case report

A 74-year-old man with a history of metastatic colorectal cancer was admitted with a four week history of progressive dyspnoea and evidence of severe respiratory failure. He had recently completed six cycles of FOLFOX chemotherapy in the months prior to presentation. Investigations did not reveal convincing evidence of infection or pulmonary embolism. CT chest demonstrated widespread pulmonary infiltrates and interlobular septal thickening. The patient was commenced on both broad spectrum antibiotic therapy and high dose corticosteroid treatment however his respiratory failure continued to progress. The patient died four days after admission due to progressive respiratory failure. Subsequent post-mortem examination demonstrated evidence of diffuse alveolar damage without evidence of tumour infiltration, infection or pulmonary embolism.

Conclusions

Although infrequent, pulmonary toxicity can occur in association with FOLFOX therapy. Cessation of therapy and prompt initiation of corticosteroids may improve outcomes.     

FOLFOX4治疗晚期肝癌的临床研究

目的:观察FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期肝癌的疗效。方法:72例晚期肝癌患者,分为治疗组与对照组。治疗组采用FOLFOX4方案化疗,对照组采用最佳支持治疗。参照RECIST标准对该方案疗效进行评估,按照WHO抗癌药物毒副反应的分度标准评价毒副反应。结果:治疗组中40例晚期肝癌患者均可评价疗效,共完成化疗109个周期。肿瘤完全缓解（CR）0例,部分缓解（PR）8例,稳定（SD）19例,进展（PD）13例。CR+PR率20.0%,总有效率67.5%。不良反应主要为胃肠道反应、骨髓抑制及外周神经毒性,对症治疗可缓解,均可以耐受。结论:FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期肝癌临床疗效满意,安全性高,毒副反应轻,值得临床推广应用。     

Anaphylactic reaction to oxaliplatin--a case of colon cancer

Oxaliplatin (L-OHP) is a new third-generation platinum which is efficacious in treating advanced unresectable recurrent colorectal cancer as a first-line regimen. The marketing authorization was given in Japan in March, 2005. Its increased use has resulted in rare serious adverse effects, including anaphylactic shock. We experienced a case that developed anaphylactic shock by L-OHP. We report a 69-year-old man who was treated for recurrent colorectal cancer who underwent systemic chemotherapy with FOLFOX 4. After eight cycles he developed severe L-OHP associated neuropathy and lung metastases was a progressive tendency. The FOLFOX 4 regimen was discontinued and another modality, FOLFIRI regimen, was used. After eight cycles of FOLFIRI regimen, lung and liver metastases showed progressive disease for response assessment by RECIST criteria. Although a patient was stopped L-OHP for neurotoxicity, neuropathy was disappeared after 4 months interval. Therefore, we reintroduced L-OHP, FOLFOX 4 regimen. Anaphylactic shock occurred in the second cycle of reintroduction of the FOLFOX 4 regimen (total 10 cycles), 30 minutes after infusion of L-OHP. L-OHP infusion was immediately withdrawn and he was treated with intravenous hydroxyzine hydrochloride and methylprednisolone. The anaphylaxis symptoms resolved in 30 minutes. Chemotherapy based on L-OHP for unresectable recurrence colorectal cancer causes anaphylactic shock as a rare severe complication. The prediction factor is not proved. We should take steps for early detection of anaphylactic reaction and perform the appropriate treatment.     

Outcome of FOLFOX and Modified DCF Chemotherapy Regimen in Patients with Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Objectives: Chemotherapy is used as an indispensable therapy for advanced gastric cancer. Different chemotherapy regimens have been used for this purpose. Toxicity due to the Chemotherapy drugs is one limiting factor. In this study we aim to compare the efficacy and toxicity of two regimens FOLFOX (leucoverin, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) and modified DCF (mDCF) (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods: In this analytical cross-sectional study, 47 patients treated with FOLFOX regimen and 57 patients treated with mDCF regimen were recruited, Patients in both groups were compared for demographic findings, response rate, mortality rate, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: In FOLFOX and mDCF group, complete response (CR) occurred in 4.3% and 5.3%, partial response (PR) in 42.6% and 29.8%, stable disease in 34% and 52.6% and disease progression in 19.1% and 12.3%, respectively (p=0.25). Overall response rate was 48.9% and 56.1%, respectively. There was no significant difference between two regimens in OS and PFS (p=0.22). mDCF compared to FOLFOX had significantly higher hematologic, gastrointestinal complications, as well as creatinine rise, stomatitis and hair loss, but peripheral neuropathy was significantly lower. Conclusion: The results of current study showed that in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, FOLFOX regimen compared to mDCF regimen have similar ORR, OS and PFS. Toxicity rate are also lower in FOLFOX group, thus it seems a better regimen for chemotherapy.     

FOLFOX4方案治疗中晚期肝癌的临床疗效

目的 探讨FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期肝癌的临床疗效及毒副反应.方法 17例晚期肝癌患者接受FOLFOX4方案(L-OHP 85mg/m2静脉滴注d1;CF 200 mg/m2静脉滴注d1.2;5-Fu 400 mg/m2静脉滴注d1,2;5-Fu 600 mg/m2持续静脉滴注d1,2;每3周重复)全身化疗,每例至少化...     

FOLFOX方案治疗局部进展期或转移性胃癌

目的 观察FOLFOX方案治疗局部进展期或转移性胃癌的疗效及不良反应.方法 经组织学证实的局部进展期或转移性胃腺癌患者96例,其中手术切除后行辅助化疗者21例,无法手术切除、行姑息化疗者75例,接受FOLFOX方案化疗(奥沙利铂85 ms/m2,静脉滴注2 h,第1天;亚叶酸钙200 mg/m2,静脉滴注2 h,第1～2天;5-氟尿嘧啶400 mg/m2,静脉注射,第1～2天;5-氟尿嘧啶600 ms/m2,持续静脉灌注44 h;每2周重复),中位化疗6个周期.4个周期后进行疗效评价.结果 21例手术切除后接受辅助化疗的患者中,16例复发,11例死亡,中位无病生存期(TTP)为24.0个月,中位生存期为37.6个月,3年生存率为51.8%.75例接受姑息化疗的转移性胃癌患者中,无CR病例,PR 30例,SD 20例,PD 25例,总有效率为40.0%,中位TTP为5.9个月,中位生存期为12.0个月.FOLFOX方案化疗的主要不良反应为血液学毒性、恶心呕吐和末梢神经感觉异常,多为Ⅰ～Ⅱ度,Ⅲ度不良反应主要为恶心呕吐(6例)和末梢神经感觉异常(4例).结论 奥沙利铂联合5-氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙的化疗方案作为辅助化疗或姑息化疗用于局部进展期或转移性胃癌均有较好疗效,且毒性反应轻,患者耐受性好.     

A case of heavily pretreated rectal cancer with disseminated intravascular coagulation that improved following reintroduction of FOLFOX plus bevacizumab

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a complication that may be experienced by patients with solid tumors. The prognosis of solid tumors with DIC is much poorer than those without DIC. Although treatment of the underlying disease is critical for improvement of DIC, the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy in patients with DIC associated with colorectal cancer are not clear. A 50-year-old man with advanced rectal cancer and multiple liver metastases experienced DIC during third-line treatment with cetuximab plus irinotecan, following 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) plus bevacizumab and 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab. Combination chemotherapy consisting of FOLFOX plus bevacizumab was reintroduced. Although platelet and fresh-frozen plasma transfusions were required daily before chemotherapy, the patient’s laboratory values improved after two cycles of chemotherapy, without severe toxicity. The patient was discharged, and FOLFOX plus bevacizumab has been continued on an outpatient basis without sign of recurrence of DIC as of December 2010 (4 months after initiation of chemotherapy). This case suggests that reintroduction of combination chemotherapy with FOLFOX plus bevacizumab is effective and feasible in patients with colorectal cancer with DIC and that chemotherapy may be a treatment option for such patients.     

晚期十二指肠癌肝转移一线化疗方案的临床观察

目的:探讨晚期十二指肠癌肝转移患者一线化疗方案的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾分析本院2008年6月至2016年1月收治的晚期十二指肠癌肝转移患者23例,6例未化疗,17例化疗,其中GEMOX方案8例、FOLFOX方案9例。采用Log-rank法进行生存分析。采用RECIST 1.1版与NCI-CTC 4.0版标准评价近期疗效和不良反应。结果:17例化疗患者均可评价疗效和不良反应,共完成化疗83个周期,中位化疗4个周期(2~12个周期)。GEMOX组获PR 1例、SD 5例、PD 2例,DCR为75.0%。FOLFOX组获SD 5例、PD 4例,DCR为55.6%。两组均无CR病例。23例肝转移患者的中位OS为9.8个月。17例化疗患者的中位OS为13.2个月,6例未化疗患者的中位OS为4.4个月,差异有统计学意义(P=0.032)。GEMOX组的中位OS为13.2个月,FOLFOX组的中位OS为10.3个月,差异无统计学意义(P=0.816)。GEMOX组的中位PFS为4.9个月,FOLFOX组的中位PFS为2.5个月,差异无统计学意义(P=0.468)。常见不良反应多为1-2级,主要为白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、贫血、乏力及恶心等。结论:肝转移影响晚期十二指肠癌患者的预后。化疗可延长晚期十二指肠癌肝转移患者的生存。GEMOX方案和FOLFOX方案均对晚期十二指肠癌肝转移一线治疗有效,且耐受性良好。GEMOX方案可能有更好的生存获益。     

新辅助化疗在局部晚期胃癌治疗中的应用

背景与目的：由于临床上治疗局部晚期胃癌的效果仍较差,近几年来,新辅助化疗在局部晚期胃癌治疗中的作用又成为热点.本研究探讨FOLFOX改良新辅助化学方案治疗局部晚期胃癌的疗效及毒副作用.方法：2002年12月-2006年12月,有39例局部晚期胃癌患者入组本次临床研究.入组患者接受的新辅助化疗方案：奥沙利铂（Oxa）145 mg/m2,第1天,静滴2 h,继而亚叶酸钙（CF）500 mg及氟尿嘧啶（5-FU）3.5 g/m2分别置入微量泵内持续滴注5 d,每隔2周为一个周期,共2个周期.观察新辅助化疗后肿瘤原发病灶的缓解情况,并观察毒副反应.结果：所有接受新辅助化疗后的患者临床有效率（CR＋PR）为62.0%（24/39）,SD 11例（28.2%）,PD 4例（10.3%）,39例患者均进行了手术,3例无法手术切除,手术切除率为92.3%（36/39）.毒副反应主要为白细胞减少症、腹泻、恶心、呕吐、脱发、口腔炎.结论：以FOLFOX改良新辅助化疗方案在局部晚期胃癌的治疗中近期疗效显著,耐受性良好.     

FOLFOX4化疗方案联合免疫治疗在中晚期肝癌中的应用价值(附2例报告)

目的:探讨FOLFOX4化疗方案联合全身免疫治疗在中晚期肝细胞癌中的应用价值及疗效。方法:回顾性分析2例在空军军医大学唐都医院就诊的中晚期肝癌患者资料，给予FOLFOX4全身化疗联合胸腺法新的免疫治疗后患者病情缓解，疾病完全控制。分析FOLFOX4化疗方案在中晚期肝癌中的应用价值，及联合应用时机选择。结果:2例中晚期患者中，其中1例患者合并有双肺转移瘤，全身化疗后7个周期肺转移瘤消失，肿瘤标志物降至正常。另1例患者肝癌破裂根治术后，患者腹腔转移瘤切除术后，给予全身联合治疗，患者2年内病情稳定，肿瘤标志物正常。结论:FOLFOX4化疗方案在中晚期肝癌患者中的效果是肯定的，联合胸腺法新的全身辅助免疫治疗有助于增强全身化疗的疗效，改善患者的总体生存预后。     

FOLFOX4 方案二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床观察

  目的 评价奥沙利铂联合亚叶酸钙和5氟脲嘧啶组成的FOLFOX4方案二线治疗晚期胃癌的有效性及安全性。方法 34例经过紫杉类药物为主方案治疗后失败的晚期胃癌患者，给予FOLFOX4方案化疗，治疗后按WHO标准进行评价。结果 全组34例，可评价疗效的有33例，其中CR1例，PR6例，SD14例，PD12例，RR率为21．2％，中位缓解时间5个月，中位TTP4．2个月，中位生存期6个月；可评价毒性的有34例，毒副反应主要是骨髓抑制、恶心、呕吐等消化道反应及外周感觉神经毒性，经对症处理，可以逆转。结论 FOLFOX4方案二线治疗晚期胃癌疗效肯定，安全性较好，值得深入研究。     

TP方案治疗NP方案化疗失败的非小细胞肺癌的疗效观察

目的评价NP方案化疗后进展的晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）应用TP方案化疗的疗效和毒副反应。方法34例NSCLC均曾接受过NP方案化疗2周期,出现病情进展后接受TP方案化疗,紫杉醇135mg／m^2,d1,顺铂20mg／m^2,d1-4,21d为1周期,完成2周期评价疗效,观察毒副反应。结果34例中CR0例,PR3例（8．82％）,SD6例（17．65％）,PD25例（73．53％）,总有效率为8．82％。主要毒副反应是骨髓抑制和胃肠道反应。结论TP方案对NP方案化疗失败的晚期NSCLC有一定疗效,但有效率较低,提示有交叉耐药性。     

Metastatic rectal cancer responding to third-line therapy employing bevacizumab after failure of oxaliplatin and irinotecan: case report

A 61-year-old female with surgically treated rectal cancer that had metastasized to lung and lymph nodes was treated with bevacizumab (BV) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) as third-line chemotherapy after treatment failures with infusional 5-FU, LV and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX regimen); and infusional 5-FU, LV and irinotecan (FOLFIRI regimen). After four cycles of treatment, a computed tomography scan revealed reduced sizes of the lung and lymph node metastases. Tumor response has still been maintained after six cycles of treatment, and the chemotherapeutic response was evaluated as partial response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumor guidelines. Manageable toxicity included grade 2 hypertension, grade 1 epistaxis and grade 1 stomatitis. Although there are no clinical trial results supporting the use of BV-containing therapy as third-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer, BV plus 5-FU and LV was effective and feasible in our patient with colon cancer that had progressed after treatment with 5-FU, irinotecan and oxaliplatin.     

SOX方案与FOLFOX4方案一线治疗老年晚期结直肠癌的疗效对比

目的:比较奥沙利铂联合替吉奥(SOX方案)与FOLFOX4方案一线治疗老年晚期结直肠癌的有效性和安全性.方法:将86例老年晚期结直肠癌患者分为两组:43例采用SOX方案为观察组,43例采用FOL-FOX4方案为对照组.每例患者至少完成2个周期化疗后评价疗效及毒性.结果:观察组与对照组的有效率(RR)分别为51.2％和48.8％,疾病控制率(DCR)分别为81.4％和76.7％,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);两组患者的1年生存率分别为53.49％和48.83％,中位肿瘤进展时间(TTP)分别为8.4个月和8.1个月,差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05).观察组的白细胞减少、恶心呕吐发生率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论:SOX与FOLFOX4方案一线治疗老年晚期结直肠癌疗效相似,但SOX方案的耐受性较FOLFOX4方案更好.     

Elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer: tolerability and activity of chemotherapy

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the most common gastrointestinal tumor in Western countries and is increasing in elderly patients. In recent years, new treatments based on the use of 5-fluorouracil associated with oxaliplatin or CPT-11 have shown promising activity. The aim of the present study was to analyze the tolerability and activity of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin or CPT-11 in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: Patients aged 70 years or older with advanced colorectal cancer were treated with 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 in bolus and 600 mg/m2 in a 22-hr continuous infusion on days 1-2) plus folinic acid (100 mg/m2) associated to oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2 on day 1, FOLFOX regimen) or CPT-11 (180 mg/m2 on day 1, FOLFIRI regimen), every 14 days. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with a median age of 76 years (range, 70-82) were treated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease. We observed a partial response in 8/29 (27.6%), stable disease in 11/29 (37.9%) and progressive disease in 10/29 (34.5%). Median survival was 21 months; 1-year survival probability was 89.8%. Grade III leukopenia was observed in 2/29 (7%) patients and grade III diarrhea in 1/29 patients. No other grade III-IV toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: FOLFOX and FOLFIRI appear to be active and well tolerated regimens for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer.     

5-fluorouracil leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in the treatment of metastatic colon cancer with severe liver dysfunction

Colon cancer patients with severe hepatic dysfunction secondary to liver metastases have limited treatment options. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) infusional therapy has been attempted, but data suggesting significant clinical benefit are lacking. Although both 5-FU and oxaliplatin have been well tolerated as single agents in patients with severe hepatic dysfunction, the combination of these drugs in this setting has not been investigated. We report on three patients with severe liver dysfunction secondary to metastatic colon cancer treated with a combination of 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin (FOLFOX). All three patients tolerated chemotherapy well without any significant toxicity. Liver function tests improved within 2 weeks from the start of treatment. Clinical outcomes consisted of two partial responses and one disease stabilization. Two patients progressed after 4 and 7 months from FOLFOX initiation while treatment is ongoing in the third patient. FOLFOX chemotherapy is feasible and can be associated with positive outcomes in patients with metastatic colon cancer and severe hepatic dysfunction. This regimen should be investigated further in similar clinical settings.     

不同化疗方案在晚期胃癌患者中的疗效对比

目的：比较SP与FOLFOX4两种化疗方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效。方法选取84例晚期胃癌患者,按照随机数字表法分为SP组与FOLFOX4组,每组42例。SP组患者接受SP化疗方案,FOLFOX4组患者接受FOLFOX4化疗方案,比较两组患者的临床疗效、中位疾病进展时间、中位生存时间及两组患者化疗过程中出现的不良反应。结果 SP组患者临床有效率为55.00%,FOLFOX4组患者临床有效率为46.15%,两组疗效比较差异无统计学意义（P﹥0.05）;两组患者中位疾病进展时间及中位生存时间比较差异均无统计学意义（P﹥0.05）;在不良反应发生方面,SP组白细胞减少、恶心呕吐、腹泻发生率低于FOLFOX4组,差异有统计学意义（P﹤0.05）;贫血、手足综合征、肝功能异常、口腔黏膜炎等不良反应,两组比较差异无统计学意义（P﹥0.05）。结论 SP方案与FOLFOX4方案在治疗晚期胃癌方面均具有较好的临床疗效,且SP方案患者白细胞减少、恶心呕吐、腹泻等不良反应发生率低,值得临床上进一步研究应用。     

HCPT联合FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期胃癌、大肠癌疗效观察

目的评价羟基喜树碱(HCPT)联合FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期胃癌、大肠癌的近期疗效和毒副反应。方法28例晚期消化道癌患者,先给予草酸铂(L-OHP)85mg/m2静脉点滴2h d1,亚叶酸钙(CF)200mg/m2静脉点滴2h d1~d2,随后5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)400mg/m2静脉推注,5-FU600mg/m2静脉点滴22h d1~d2,同时给予HCPT6 mg/m2静脉点滴3h d1~d3。2周重复,4周期后评价疗效。结果全组28例,其中完全缓解(CR)2例(7.1%),部分缓解(PR)16例(57.1%),稳定(SD)4例(14.3%),进展(PD)6例(21.4%)。总有效率(CR PR)64.3%。胃癌16例,11例有效,有效率68.8%。大肠癌12例,7例有效,有效率58.3%。毒副反应主要是恶心呕吐,白细胞减少,神经感觉毒性,无化疗相关死亡。结论HCPT联合FOLFOX4方案治疗晚期消化道癌疗效肯定,毒副反应能耐受。     

晚期十二指肠癌患者一线化疗的临床疗效及预后因素分析

目的 探讨晚期十二指肠癌患者一线化疗方案的疗效与安全性以及影响预后的因素。方法 回顾分析本院2008年6月至2016年1月收治的晚期十二指肠癌患者40例,9例未接受化疗,31例接受化疗,其中GEMOX方案13例、FOLFOX方案13例、卡培他滨单药2例和吉西他滨单药3例。采用RECIST 1.1版与NCI CTC 4.0版标准评价化疗的近期疗效和不良反应。生存分析采用Kaplan Meier法并行Log rank检验,多因素分析采用Cox比例风险回归模型。结果 31例化疗患者均可评价疗效和不良反应,共完成化疗146个周期,中位化疗4个周期（2～12个周期）。GEMOX方案组获PR 1例、SD 10例、PD 2例,疾病控制率（DCR）为84.6％;FOLFOX方案组获SD 6例、PD 7例,DCR为46.2％;单药组：卡培他滨获SD 2例,吉西他滨获SD 1例、PD 2例,DCR为60.0％。31例化疗患者的中位生存期（OS）为15.7个月,9例未化疗患者的中位OS为4.4个月,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.001）。GEMOX方案组的中位OS为279个月,FOLFOX方案组为152个月,单药组为152个月,差异无统计学意义（P=0.656）。GEMOX方案组的中位无进展生存期（PFS）为7.8个月,FOLFOX方案组为4.0个月,单药组为5.1个月,差异无统计学意义（P=0.053）。常见不良反应多为1～2级,主要为白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、贫血、乏力及恶心等。单因素分析显示,浸润深度、分化程度、是否肝转移及是否化疗与晚期十二指肠癌的预后有关（P＜0.05）。Cox多因素分析显示,分化程度、是否肝转移及是否化疗是影响晚期十二指肠癌患者预后的独立因素。结论 GEMOX方案、FOLFOX方案、卡培他滨单药及吉西他滨单药一线化疗均对晚期十二指肠癌有效,且耐受性良好;其中GEMOX方案可能有更好的生存获益。分化程度、是否肝转移及是否化疗可能是影响晚期十二指肠癌患者的预后因素,临床上可作参考。