Late cytomegalovirus infection after oral ganciclovir prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review our experience with a consecutive group of 41 renal transplant recipients (R) who received a kidney from a cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositive donor (D(+)) and had 3 months of prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir. Patients were prospectively monitored clinically and with determinations of CMV antigenemia for at least 6 months. Patients were followed for a mean period of 247+/-16 days. CMV antigenemia developed in 51% of patients (53% D(+)R(-), 47% D(+)R(+)) after the transplant, but in no case was antigenemia seen during the period of oral ganciclovir therapy. Antigenemia developed at a median of 167 days post transplant (range 99-522 days) and peak antigen counts ranged from <1-3940, and tended to be higher in D(+)R(-) recipients. Infection was symptomatic in 67% of the antigenemic patients and symptoms tended to be more marked in the D(+)/R(-) than in the D(+)/R(+) group. All symptomatic patients were treated with intravenous ganciclovir (21 days) followed by 9 weeks of oral ganciclovir and responded with resolution of symptoms and antigenemia. No evidence of tissue-invasive disease was seen. Recurrence of antigenemia was observed exclusively in the D(+)R(-) group, occurred with less severe manifestations of CMV infection, and invariably responded to retreatment with ganciclovir. Our results suggest that oral ganciclovir prophylaxis is effective in preventing CMV infection during the 3-month period of prophylaxis, that a 3-month period of prophylaxis appears to be sufficient for D(+)R(+) recipients, but a longer period of oral ganciclovir prophylaxis may be needed in D(+)R(-) recipients. Clinicians caring for renal transplant recipients should be vigilant to the possibility of late CMV infection, especially in D(+)R(-) recipients.     

Cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients

We have retrospectively analyzed the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in 250 consecutive renal allograft transplants performed in 244 recipients. The mean follow-up was 35.1+/-25.4 months. Immunosuppression was cyclosporine- or tacrolimus-based triple therapy. CMV infection prophylaxis with ganciclovir for 3 months post transplant was prescribed in CMV-seronegative recipients of allografts from seropositive donors (D+R-) and in all recipients treated with OKT3. CMV antigenemia was monitored by the pp65-antigen assay. Thirteen of 57 D+R- recipients (22.8%) developed CMV antigenemia. One recipient had a breakthrough of CMV antigenemia during ganciclovir prophylaxis; 12 D+R- recipients developed CMV antigenemia 147.5+/-173.8 days after transplantation. Four of 13 (30.7%) D+R- recipients had asymptomatic CMV infection, 8 (61.6%) had CMV infection with non-specific symptoms including fever, and 1 (7.7%) developed CMV pneumonia. Six of 13 (46.1%) D+R- patients had been treated with intensified immunosuppressive therapy before CMV infection. In the low-risk CMV groups (D+R+; D-R+; D-R-), 28 recipients (14.5%) developed CMV antigenemia 42.5+/-15.2 days post transplantation. Ten of the 28 (35.7%) recipients had asymptomatic CMV infection, 17 (60.7%) developed CMV infection with non-specific symptoms, and 1 (3.6%) developed CMV pneumonia. Twenty-one of 28 (75.0%) had intensified immunosuppressive therapy before CMV infection. In conclusion, ganciclovir prophylaxis diminished and delayed the onset of CMV infection but did not totally prevent it from occurring in D+R- renal transplant recipients. Clinicians should be vigilant to the possibility of CMV infection in both seronegative and seropositive recipients, especially after anti-rejection therapy.     

Oral valganciclovir as preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus infection post allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Antiviral compounds including ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir are routinely used in the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease; however, these agents have a poor oral bioavailability and have the inconvenience and expense of intravenous administration. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral valganciclovir (VGCV) for preemptive treatment of CMV reactivation in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 15 patients receiving allogeneic HSCT from related (n=9) or unrelated (n=6) donors. In all patients, either the donor, host, or both were CMV Ig G positive pretransplant. Indication for therapy was preemptive treatment of CMV infection defined as one or two consecutive positive tests of pp65 antigenemia assay or CMV-polymerase chain reaction (PCR). VGCV was administered orally in a dosage of 900 mg b.i.d. for 2 weeks, followed by 450 mg b.i.d. for 2 additional weeks. RESULTS: Patients developed a positive CMV-PCR after a median of 52 days (range 37-427) post HSCT and a positive pp65 antigenemia after a median time of 74 days (range 37-427) post HSCT. Preemptive treatment with VGCV was started a median time of 56 days (range 37-429) after transplant. In all, 11 patients (73%) completed the 28 days of therapy with VGCV. All patients showed a complete clearance of the virus. The median time to achieve a negative CMV-PCR was 6 days (range 4-18). A relapse of CMV infection after VGCV preemptive therapy occurred in 6 patients (40%). No patient developed early or late CMV disease. Six patients (40%) presented hematological toxicity including neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia that required drug discontinuation in 4 cases. CONCLUSION: VGCV administered as preemptive therapy for CMV infection in patients receiving an allogeneic HSCT showed promise for treating this frequent complication. Prospective randomized studies in this setting are mandatory to yield more definitive results.     

High-dose acyclovir and pre-emptive ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in myeloablative and non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation

We evaluated high-dose acyclovir and pre-emptive ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in myeloablative and non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. One hundred and seventy-four consecutive patients who were at risk for CMV infection (either recipient or donor seropositive) and received either intensive chemoradiotherapy and a T cell-depleted stem cell transplant followed by delayed add-back of donor T cells (TCDT: n = 98), or a non-myeloablative preparative regimen followed by an unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cell transplant (NMT: n = 76) from an HLA-identical sibling donor were studied. All received high-dose acyclovir (HDACV) from day - 7 for 3 months post-transplant in conjunction with weekly CMV pp65 antigenemia monitoring and pre-emptive treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (not CMV-specific) and ganciclovir. The actuarial probabilities of developing pp65 antigenemia were 83 +/- 4% after TCDT and 41 +/- 6% after NMT (P < 0.00001) with reactivation occurring earlier in the TCDT group (the median 36 days vs 55 days). We observed no reactivation of CMV in seronegative recipients with a seropositive donor (n = 23). A total of 11 patients (5 in TCDT, 6 in NMT) developed CMV disease within 400 days after transplantation, and one death was clearly attributable to CMV interstitial pneumonitis (IP). This strategy was associated with effective control of CMV antigenemia in the majority of patients and near-complete eradication of fatal CMV IP.     

Initial low-dose valganciclovir as a preemptive therapy is effective for cytomegalovirus infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients is effective in decreasing the incidence of CMV disease. Intravenous ganciclovir is a commonly used preemptive therapy, but as we have recently shown, oral valganciclovir (VGC) is a useful alternative. However, the optimal dose of VGC has not been determined. We prospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of an initial low-dose of VGC (900?mg QD) as preemptive therapy in 20 patients with low-level CMV antigenemia following allogeneic HSCT. Patients were screened weekly for CMV pp65 antigenemia after engraftment. Preemptive therapy with VGC (900?mg QD) was initiated if more than two CMV antigen-positive cells per 50,000 leukocytes were detected. CMV antigen-positive cells disappeared from all 20 patients after 14-29?days (median 20?days) of VGC treatment. None of the patients developed CMV disease nor did they require more than the conventional VGC dose (900?mg BID). Neutropenia (<500/μL) developed in three patients who required granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor support, but there were no other significant side effects. These observations suggest that the initial dose of VGC in preemptive therapy for CMV can be safely decreased to 900?mg QD for patients with low-level CMV antigenemia.     

Prevention dof recurrent cytomegalovirus disease in renal and liver transplant recipients: effect of oral ganciclovir

Background: Although the primary treatment of symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in organ transplant recipients is successful in >90% of individuals, relapsing disease, particularly in those with primary infection, remains an important problem. Previously, we had observed that the rate of symptomatic recurrence was >60% in those with primary disease (seronegative for CMV prior to transplant), and approximately 20% in those who were seropositive prior to transplant. The present study was undertaken to determine whether a maintenance regimen of oral ganciclovir for 2–3 months added to the routine 14–21 days of intravenous ganciclovir would further prevent symptomatic CMV recurrence. Methods: From May 1995 until June 1998, all kidney and liver transplant recipients with confirmed tissue‐invasive CMV disease or CMV syndrome were treated with 14–21 days of intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg b.i.d. with dose adjusted for renal dysfunction) followed by 2–3 months of oral ganciclovir (2 g daily). The incidence of recurrence of CMV disease and/or viremia during and after oral therapy was then determined over a mean follow‐up of 530.6 days. Results: Thirty‐seven patients, 19 kidney and 18 liver transplant recipients, were studied; 5 had biopsy‐proven tissue‐invasive disease (13.5) and 32 suffered a CMV syndrome (86.5). Twenty‐one of these patients (58.6) were seronegative for CMV prior to transplant and received an allograft from a seropositive donor (D+/R?). Overall, 10 patients (27.0) developed CMV recurrence. Eight of 21 patients who were D+/R? for CMV (38.1) developed recurrence as opposed to 2 of 16 patients with other serologic status (12.5) (P=0.14). Patients with recurrent CMV disease and/or viremia had a peak antigenemia assay titer during their initial CMV event of 319.2 positive cells/2 slides compared with 109.8 positive cells/2 slides for patients without recurrent CMV infection (P=0.14); the trend of having a higher peak antigenemia assay titer among patients who recurred occurred both in patients who were at risk of primary CMV infection (D+/R? for CMV) and in those who were not. Two patients developed recurrent infection with strains of CMV that were resistant to ganciclovir. Conclusions: This new therapeutic regimen of oral ganciclovir following intravenous ganciclovir slightly reduced the overall rate of recurrent CMV disease and/or viremia, but it still did not adequately prevent CMV recurrence in patients who are at risk of primary infection prior to transplant. Of particular concern, 2 patients with primary infection treated with this regimen developed ganciclovir‐resistant recurrent disease ( Note Presented in part at the American Society of Transplant Physicians Meeting, May 1999, Chicago, Illinois.
).     

A randomised trial comparing cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay vs screening bronchoscopy for the early detection and prevention of disease in allogeneic bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplant recipients

Preemptive antiviral therapy is often employed for CMV prevention following allogeneic BMT. Two common strategies are a screening bronchoscopy for CMV post-BMT or regular CMV antigenemia testing with ganciclovir administration for a positive result. In a randomised trial, we prospectively compared the efficacy of these two preemptive strategies. Consecutive patients were randomised to either a bronchoscopy for CMV on day 35 post BMT or weekly CMV antigenemia testing. If the bronchoscopy was positive for CMV, patients received preemptive ganciclovir for 8-10 weeks. If the antigenemia was positive for CMV, patients received a minimum of 2 weeks of preemptive ganciclovir. The primary endpoint was the development of active CMV disease. One hundred and eighteen allogeneic BMT patients were enrolled (60 in the antigenemia arm and 58 in the bronchoscopy arm). The two groups were comparable with respect to baseline demographic data, underlying disease, conditioning regimen, and immunosuppression. Active CMV disease developed in 7/58 (12.1%) patients in the bronchoscopy arm vs 1/60 patients (1.7%) in the CMV antigenemia arm (P = 0.022). Based on the screening test, 13.8% of patients received preemptive ganciclovir in the bronchoscopy arm vs 48.3% of patients in the antigenemia arm (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the rate of graft-versus-host disease, bacteremia, invasive fungal infections or mortality between the two groups. Preemptive therapy based on regular CMV antigenemia monitoring is superior to screening bronchoscopy for the prevention of CMV disease after allogeneic BMT.     

Current antiviral strategies for controlling cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: prevention and therapy

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a cause of significant morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Ganciclovir prophylaxis, or preemptive treatment based on detection of antigenemia or CMV DNA by PCR, effectively prevents CMV disease during the first 100 days after transplant in allograft recipients. In recipients of T-cell depleted transplant or if severe acute graft-versus-host disease is present, ganciclovir prophylaxis or preemptive treatment should be started with an induction course of ganciclovir (5 mg/kg BID) and given at least 5 days per week and continued until day 100 after transplant. Although prevention of CMV disease before day 100 is highly effective, there is a continued risk of late-onset CMV disease after day 100. In CMV-seropositive recipients, the incidence of late CMV disease may be as high as 17%. Strategies to prevent late CMV infection and disease are needed. In seronegative recipients, seronegative or leukocyte-reduced blood products are effective in preventing acquisition of CMV through blood products. Controversy exists about the optimal strategy of preventing CMV disease in seropositive autologous HSCT recipients. The outcome of CMV pneumonia remains poor despite treatment with ganciclovir in combination with CMV hyperimmune globulin or intravenous immunoglobulin. Owing to continued clinical significance of CMV in the HSCT setting, new and more effective anti-CMV drugs with improved pharmacokinetic properties are urgently needed.     

High incidence of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infection among lung transplant recipients receiving preemptive therapy.

Preemptive antiviral therapy in transplant patients is thought to be less likely to lead to antiviral resistance than is routine prophylaxis. Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive lung transplant patients (R+) were assigned to receive pp65 antigen-guided ganciclovir therapy, and seronegative recipients of organs from seropositive donors (D+/R-) were assigned to receive initially preemptive and then routine ganciclovir prophylaxis. The incidence of infection with ganciclovir-resistant (ganR) CMV was assessed retrospectively. GanR CMV infection developed in 4 (9%) of 45 patients, at a median of 4.4 months (range, 3.1-6.6 months) after transplantation, and was more common among D+/R- patients than among R+ patients (3 of 11 vs. 1 of 34; P =.04). The incidence among patients who received preemptive therapy was similar to that among patients who received routine prophylaxis. All ganR isolates contained a UL97 mutation. GanR CMV infection occurs in nearly 10% of lung transplant recipients, despite preemptive antiviral therapy, and is more common among D+/R- patients.     

巨细胞病毒pp65抗原血症检测

目的：评估巨细胞病毒（CMV）pp65白细胞抗原血症在骨髓移植或外周血干细胞移植后活动性CMV感染早期诊断和CMV 病的预测、指导CMV亚临床期感染的抗病毒治疗及抗病毒疗效判断中的价值。方法：1999年9月－2000年4月共收集 210份乙二胺四乙酸（EDTA）抗凝血，骨髓移植或外周血干细胞移植患者36例。移植前用ELISA法检测患者CMV特异性抗体IgG和IgM，移植后3周起采用CMV Brite试验盒每周检测1次CMV pp65抗原血症，并计数抗原 阳性细胞，直到移植后100d或治疗后抗原阴转、死亡或出院。移植后患者第1次检测到bp65抗原阳性细胞即开始更昔洛韦抗病毒治疗。结果：36例骨髓移植或干细胞移植患者于移植前CMV特异性抗体IgG均阳性，IgM均阴性；移植后16例出现CMV pp65抗原血症，其中15例 出现有症状的CMV感染或CMV病，14例接受更昔洛韦抗病毒治疗，12例治疗后抗原血症阴转、症状消失、死亡2例（病死率14．2％），未经抗病毒治疗者2例均死亡（P＜0．01）。16例pp65抗原阳性患者中，仅2例CMV特异性抗体IgM阳性。10名健康对照组的CMV特异性抗体IgG均阳性，IgM均阴性；pp65抗原血症 检测均阴性。结论：本研究结果提示，人CMV pp65白细胞抗原血症检测可作为骨髓移植后CMV病的预测指标，指导移植后抗病毒治疗的开展和疗效评价。pp65白细胞抗原症出现即开始抗病毒治疗可明显降低病死率。     

Use of the cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia assay for preemptive therapy in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a real‐world review

Abstract: Despite advances in surveillance strategies and antivirals, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to pose problems to patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs). The bone marrow transplant (BMT) unit at the Singapore General Hospital embraced the preemptive strategy in late 2003. Although several studies have demonstrated its usefulness, we conducted this review to document CMV‐related events at our institution. Forty‐six patients underwent CMV surveillance using the CMV pp65 antigenemia (CMV Ag) assay from January 2004 to December 2005. Twenty‐seven patients had CMV infection, and 19 remained antigenemia‐negative. No differences were found between the 2 groups for the following potential risk factors for CMV infection: age, total number of co‐morbidities, duration of neutropenia after conditioning, baseline creatinine, type of conditioning regimen (conventional vs. reduced intensity), type of transplant (matched sibling vs. others), recipient CMV status, donor CMV status, and use of total body irradiation. Two patients received alemtuzumab; both developed CMV Ag. Twelve episodes of CMV infection occurred after the 100th post‐HSCT day. Two patients developed CMV disease. One of them could be considered a failure of the preemptive strategy, as she had CMV gastritis diagnosed on the same day that she became pp65‐positive. The other developed CMV disease despite prompt institution of ganciclovir, although she had multiple post‐HSCT complications requiring enhanced immunosuppression, as well as relapsed disease. One‐year disease‐free survival was 55.5% in those with CMV infection and 52.3% in those without infection. Survival was not affected by CMV infection.     

Cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia-guided early treatment with ganciclovir versus ganciclovir at engraftment after allogeneic marrow transplantation: a randomized double-blind study

To determine whether cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemiaguided ganciclovir treatment may be as effective, may require less treatment, and thus may cause less marrow toxicity than ganciclovir administered at engraftment, 226 marrow transplant recipients were randomized at engraftment to receive placebo (antigenemia-ganciclovir group) or ganciclovir (ganciclovir group) until day 100 in a double-blind study. In patients with antigenemia of 3 or more positive cells in 2 slides and/or viremia, study drug was discontinued and ganciclovir was started for at least 3 weeks or until negative CMV antigenemia and resumed only if antigenemia recurred. More patients in the antigenemia-ganciclovir group developed CMV disease before day 100 after transplantation compared with the ganciclovir group (14% v 2.7%, P = .002). Of the 16 patients with CMV disease before day 100 in the antigenemia-ganciclovir group, 10 (8.8%) had disease before or during the first episode of antigenemia and 6 (5.3%) developed disease after discontinuation of ganciclovir. Untreated low-grade antigenemia progressed to CMV disease in 19% of patients with grade 3-4 compared with 0% of patients with grade 0-2 acute graft-versus-host disease (P = .04). There was no significant difference in CMV disease by day 180 after transplantation and thereafter. CMV-related death, transplant survival, and neutropenia were not significantly different between the groups. In the ganciclovir group, more invasive fungal infections occurred (P = .03) and more ganciclovir was used (P < .0001). Thus, delaying the start of ganciclovir until highgrade antigenemia and discontinuing ganciclovir based on negative antigenemia results in more CMV disease by day 100 than ganciclovir administered at engraftment. However, ganciclovir at engraftment is associated with more early invasive fungal infections and more late CMV disease resulting in similar survival rates.     

A short-term preemptive treatment for cytomegalovirus infection in seropositive patients after liver transplantation

Background/purpose

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a challenge following liver transplantation. Preemptive treatment is an effective strategy for CMV infection. However, how long preemptive treatment should be applied is not defined.

Methods

Clinical records of preemptive treatment for CMV infection in patients who underwent liver transplantation were collected. CMV antigenemia (pp65) was monitored weekly during hospital stay and subsequently on follow up whenever indicated clinically. Antiviral treatment was administered based on positive antigenemia (>1 positive cell per 500,000 leukocytes) and discontinued when antigenemia became negative.

Results

CMV infection was diagnosed in 58 (43.9%) of 132 liver transplantation patients. All 58 patients were seropositive for CMV before transplantation. CMV infection was first diagnosed at a median time of 20?days (interquartile range [IQR] 15.3?C26) after transplantation. Twelve (20.7%) patients developed repeated infections. Only one of 58 patients (1.7%) was suspected to have invasive disease. The median (IQR) duration of antiviral treatment was 7 (7?C12) days. Of these patients with CMV infection, 14 (24.1%) patients developed acute rejection peri-anti-CMV treatment and 36 (62.1%) developed other infectious complications.

Conclusion

Preemptive treatment is an effective way to halt the progression of asymptomatic CMV infection. A brief course of antiviral treatment is enough for seropositive patients with CMV infection after liver transplantation.     

Prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease after lung transplantation: results using a unique regimen employing delayed ganciclovir

BACKGROUND: Many lung transplant programs employ lengthy regimens of IV ganciclovir therapy to prevent disease due to cytomegalovirus (CMV). In 1994, we introduced a regimen of delayed ganciclovir prophylaxis for CMV infection. This consisted of 2 weeks of IV ganciclovir therapy, initiated 3 to 4 weeks after transplantation, with subsequent viral monitoring and preemptive therapy as needed. When not receiving ganciclovir, patients received oral acyclovir, 800 mg tid, for 6 months. CMV-seronegative patients with seropositive donors also received four doses of CMV hyperimmune globulin. This study analyzes the CMV outcomes of 54 patients who received the delayed regimen compared to 33 historical control subjects who received only acyclovir prophylaxis (n = 28) or oral acyclovir and 2 to 4 weeks of ganciclovir early after transplantation (n = 5). METHODS: CMV detection was by shell vial culture or IgG seroconversion; after 1996, CMV detection was by blood antigenemia. The diagnosis of CMV disease also required a typical clinical syndrome or pathologic evidence of CMV. The main outcome was the actuarial incidence of CMV infection and disease. In order to account for the effect of other important risk factors for CMV infection, the time to CMV infection and disease was also studied as dependeant variables in a Cox proportional-hazard analysis, with the delayed regimen and other important risk factors as independent variables. RESULTS: The delayed regimen reduced the actuarial incidence of CMV infection from 80 to 48% (p < 0.001) and CMV disease from 31 to 10% (p < 0.01). No seropositive patient receiving the delayed regimen developed CMV disease. Twelve of the 54 patients in the study group required additional IV antiviral treatment, but the total use of ganciclovir averaged only 18 days per patient. In a Cox proportional-hazards model, the use of delayed ganciclovir was the only factor that showed a significant association with freedom from CMV infection (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24 to 0.75; p = 0.003) and CMV disease (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.86; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: A regimen of CMV prophylaxis employing 2 weeks of IV ganciclovir initiated 3 to 4 weeks after lung transplantation followed by virologic monitoring and preemptive therapy as needed provides good protection against CMV disease.     

Randomized multicenter trial of foscarnet versus ganciclovir for preemptive therapy of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

The present study compared foscarnet with ganciclovir for preemptive therapy of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after allogeneic blood or marrow stem cell transplantation (SCT). Patients with CMV infection, as detected by weekly antigenemia or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in blood leukocytes, were randomized to intravenous therapy for 2 weeks with either foscarnet at 60 mg/kg or ganciclovir at 5 mg/kg administered every 12 hours; if CMV infection remained detectable, patients received an additional 2 weeks of intravenous foscarnet at 90 mg/kg or ganciclovir at 6 mg/kg given once daily for 5 days per week, after which therapy was stopped. Primary efficacy endpoint was the occurrence of CMV disease or death from any cause within 180 days after SCT. A total of 213 patients were treated with either foscarnet (n = 110) or ganciclovir (n = 103). Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free survival within 180 days after SCT were similar in the 2 treatment groups (P =.6). During study treatment, severe neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9)/L) occurred in 11 (11%) patients on ganciclovir versus 4 (4%) patients on foscarnet (P =.04), and impaired renal function was observed in 5 (5%) patients on foscarnet versus 2 (2%) patients on ganciclovir (P =.4). Neutropenia or thrombocytopenia required discontinuation of ganciclovir in 6 (6%) patients but in no foscarnet-treated patient (P =.03). After allogeneic SCT, preemptive therapy of CMV infection with foscarnet shows similar efficacy as with ganciclovir, but is associated with a lower proportion of patients who develop severe neutropenia and who require discontinuation of antiviral therapy due to hematotoxicity.     

Ganciclovir therapy in cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in immunocompetent pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcome of immunocompetent pediatric patients who had positive cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia and received ganciclovir. METHODS: A retrospective review was done of patients who had a CMV infection based on positive antigenemia. Medical charts were reviewed for the following information: age, sex, underlying disease, symptoms and signs, laboratory results, complementary diagnostic procedures, duration and dose of ganciclovir therapy, concomitant medications, complications, and outcome. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients with positive CMV antigenemia were identified; 15 patients were excluded from the study because of their underlying diseases. Of the remaining 49 patients, 26 (53%) were female; the median age was 11.5 months (range 0.3-132 months). Sixty-one percent (30/49) of these patients received ganciclovir (5-10 mg/kg/day) for a median of 14 days (range 7-42 days). Clinical findings included: fever, anemia, hepatomegaly, failure to thrive, elevated liver enzymes, splenomegaly, seizures, and thrombocytopenia. Sixty-three percent (19/30) of the treated patients had negative antigenemia at the end of therapy. CMV antigenemia remained positive in six (20%) patients. Nine patients received a second course of ganciclovir. CONCLUSIONS: Ganciclovir was effective in 80% of patients, as determined by negative antigenemia at the end of therapy.     

Cytomegalovirus antigen detection in peripheral blood leukocytes after allogeneic marrow transplantation.

Detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia was compared with shell vial centrifugation cultures for rapid detection of CMV infection. In a prospective study, 59 CMV seropositive patients were monitored weekly during the first 100 days after allogeneic marrow transplantation for virus excretion from urine, throat, and blood and for antigenemia by direct staining of peripheral leukocytes using an antibody pool directed against pp 65. Antigenemia was present in 21 of 22 patients with culture-proven CMV infection and in 3 of 37 without culture-proven CMV infection (sensitivity 95%, specificity 91%). The median time of onset of antigenemia and shell vial cultures was day 47 and 55 after transplant, respectively (P = .0006). Among patients who developed CMV disease without preceding cultures, antigenemia was detected in all patients with CMV pneumonia (N = 6) and in two of three patients with gastrointestinal disease by a median of 10 and 7 days, respectively, before the onset of disease (P = .0002). Levels of antigenemia were significantly higher in patients with disease or viremia than in patients with excretion from urine or throat (P less than .05). Whether the antigenemia assay is more sensitive than rapid culture methods to focus antiviral prophylaxis in marrow transplant patients must be determined in controlled studies.     

单倍体骨髓移植后巨细胞病毒感染的防治

目的:研究单倍型骨髓移植后,巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染的预防策略及发病情况。方法:98例单倍型骨髓移植患者,62例及1例CMVpp65阳性供者,接受更昔若韦预防治疗,受者5 mg／kg,2次／d,移植前-9 d～-2 d,31例移植后出现CMV抗原血症阳性患者,其中18／60例预防组,13／35例非预防组阳性病例,接受更昔若韦5 mg／kg,2次／d×2周,后改为5 mg／kg,1次／d,到CMVpp65转阴。移植后CMVpp65每周检测1次。结果:预防组18／60例移植后出现CMV抗原血症阳性,出现中位时间56(25～84)d。非预防组13／35例CMVpp65阳性,中位时间52(19～75)d,前者1例患者(1．6％)发展为CMV结肠炎,后者4例(11．4％),2例CMV肺炎,1例CMV结肠炎,1例CMV脑炎。结论:单倍型骨髓移植后,用CMVpp65检测CMV抗原血症是一种简便,可靠的方法。低剂量短疗程,静脉注射更昔若韦提前预防CMV病可能是一种有效的方法。     

Valganciclovir prophylaxis in patients at high risk for the development of cytomegalovirus disease

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in antiviral therapies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading opportunistic infection in the transplant population. Valganciclovir (VGC), the L-valyl ester prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), provides an excellent oral alternative to GCV for the prevention of CMV in transplant recipients. We investigated the use of VGC for CMV prevention in high-risk renal and pancreas transplant recipients. METHODS: Patients at high risk for development of CMV disease were defined as either those who had donor positive, recipient-negative serostatus (D+/R-), or those who received antilymphocyte antibody (ALA) therapy for either rejection treatment or induction. A retrospective review was conducted of all kidney and pancreas transplants performed between August 2001 and December 2003. A total of 341 transplants were performed, of which 109 received VGC, and 88 were included in this analysis. RESULTS: The overall incidence of CMV disease was 5.7% (5/88). All of the CMV episodes were in patients who were D+/R- (17.2% [5/29] versus 0% [0/59], P<0.001). Of these patients, all the episodes of CMV were in patients who received VGC prophylaxis for<100 days post transplant (29% [5/17] versus 0% [0/12], P=0.06). The overall incidence of leukopenia was 11% and thrombocytopenia was 7%, with the incidence between the D+/R- group and the ALA group being similar. CONCLUSION: VGC is an effective agent in preventing CMV disease in kidney and pancreas transplant recipients who are at high risk for developing the disease. The optimal length of prophylaxis in D+/R- patients is still undefined, while 3 months of prophylaxis appears to be sufficient in patients who received ALA therapy.     

Cytomegalovirus infection after autologous stem cell transplantation: incidence and outcome in a group of patients undergoing a surveillance program

This study was performed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), with the aim of performing preemptive therapy in patients with antigenemia. Starting from 2001, 171 consecutive ASCTs were performed in 136 patients; 102 of these patients were seropositive for CMV at the onset of hematological disease. In all these patients, a CMV pp65 antigenemia assay was determined weekly, starting from the day when the absolute neutrophil count went above 500/microL, and until day 60 after ASCT; subsequently, antigenemia was determined only when a CMV infection was suspected. Among the 136 transplanted patients, 40 (29.4%) presented a positive antigenemia; all of them were seropositive for CMV before ASCT; and no cases of primary infection were seen. The incidence of CMV infection in the seropositive population was 40/102 (39.3%); 6 patients (5 with multiple myeloma and 1 with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) who received 2 ASCTs developed CMV infections after both transplantations, so that positive antigenemia developed after 46/171 (26.9%) transplantations. First positive antigenemia presented a median of 32 days (range 7-57) after stem cell reinfusion. The median antigenemia level at the first appearance was 2/200,000 (range 1-1000). No significant prognostic factors could be shown. Enteritis was present in 5 patients; 2 of them also had fever, and 1 of them also had thrombocytopenia. In 5 patients fever without any other clinical signs or symptoms was present; 30 patients were asymptomatic. Fourteen patients were treated with anti-CMV drugs. CMV reactivation was successfully treated in all patients, and no patient died from CMV disease.