Two-year follow-up intravascular ultrasound analysis after bare metal stent implantation in 120 lesions.

The objective of this study was to examine long-term changes after bare metal stent implantation in a relatively large number of patients. There are few reports of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies performed on stented and nonstented (reference) segments beyond 6 months after bare metal stenting. Using IVUS, we evaluated serial changes in stented and reference segments between 6 and 24 months after stent implantation in 110 patients with 120 lesions. Serial IVUS images were acquired at five equidistant intrastent sites and at two different reference segment sites. Measurements were made of the external elastic membrane (EEM), stent, lumen, and intimal hyperplasia (IH = stent - lumen) area. For the whole patient group, between 6 and 24 months, the mean IH area in stented segments decreased from 2.6 +/- 1.0 to 2.3 36+/- 0.9 mm2 (P < 0.001), and the mean lumen area increased from 6.2 +/- 2.0 to 6.5 +/- 1.9 mm2 (P < 0.001). The mean IH area decreased in 91 lesions (76%) and increased in 29 lesions (24%) between 6 and 24 months. There were no significant changes in EEM or lumen area in the reference segments. Late angiographic restenosis (diameter stenosis > or = 50%) occurred in three lesions between 6 and 24 months. A late target lesion revascularization was performed for one lesion. In the period of time between 6 and 24 months after stenting, IH regression occurred in most (76%) stent lesions, resulting in late lumen increase. However, IH progression was observed in 24% of in-stent lesions. No significant changes of EEM or lumen area occurred in the reference segments.     

Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound findings of the late catch-up phenomenon after intracoronary beta-radiation for the treatment of in-stent restenosis

We report one-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) outcomes of in-stent restenosis (ISR) patients treated with intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT). The benefit of IVBT for treating ISR is well documented. However, few data exist on significant angiographic and intravascular ultrasonic in-stent lumen deterioration beyond the habitual 6-month analysis after the index radiation procedure or so-called late catch-up process in the treatment of ISR. Twenty-five consecutive patients with ISR were treated with IVBT using the Beta-Cath System (a 40 mm 90 Sr per 90 gamma source). Quantitative angiographic and IVUS analysis was performed in all of them at 6 and 12 months. IVBT was successful in all patients. Four patients (16%) developed recurrent angiographic binary restenosis at 6-month follow-up, all located within the adjacent reference segments, with 2 being associated with geographical miss. An additional 4 patients (16%) presented with recurrent ISR at 12-month follow-up, all within the stented segment. Significant in-stent lumen loss (0.16 +/- 0.42 mm to 0.34 +/- 0.46 mm; p = 0.008) and in-stent intimal hyperplasia growth (+11.2 +/- 0.48 mm3; p = 0.03) was observed between 6 and 12 months. Intracoronary beta-radiation for the treatment of ISR was associated with significant luminal deterioration (late catch-up) within the stents between 6 and 12 months due to an important late progression of in-stent intimal hyperplasia.     

Serial intravascular ultrasound comparison of the extent and distribution of intimal hyperplasia six months after stent implantation for de novo versus in-stent restenosis lesions

The aim of this study was to compare intimal hyperplasia (IH) growth at 6 months in patients with de novo lesions treated with stents versus IH regrowth in patients with treated in-stent restenosis. Intravascular ultrasound was performed after intervention and at the 6-month follow-up visit as part of a standardized protocol across several clinical trials. At 6 months, the lumen was larger in the de novo group (mean lumen cross-sectional area [CSA] 6.31 +/- 2.2 vs 4.48 +/- 1.9 mm(2), p = 0.0001; minimum lumen CSA 4.2 +/- 1.8 vs 2.59 +/- 1.5 mm(2), p = 0.0001). However, the total increase in the mean IH CSA volume was the similar in the de novo and ISR groups (2.89 +/- 1.6 vs 2.64 +/- 1.94 mm(2), respectively; p = 0.11). We found that IH regrowth in restented in-stent restenosis lesions was similar to that in de novo stent implantation and that the final lumen CSA was an important component of in-stent restenosis recurrence.     

Relationship between neointimal regrowth and mechanism of acute lumen gain during the treatment of in-stent restenosis with or without supplementary intravascular radiation.

We investigated whether neointimal regrowth is related to the mechanism of acute lumen gain during the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions both with and without adjunct intravascular brachytherapy. From the WRIST (Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial) cohort, 54 ISR patients ((192)Ir, 29; placebo, 25) were treated with nonrepeat stenting percutaneous interventions (excimer laser, rotational atherectomy, and/or balloon angioplasty) prior to (192)Ir or placebo therapy. Using Simpson's method, serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analyses (pre- and posttreatment and 6-month follow-up) were analyzed to obtain stent, lumen, and intimal hyperplasia (IH) volumes that were then adjusted for stent length to create stent, lumen, and IH volume indexes. In the placebo group, the acute reduction of neointima (1.6 +/- 1.4 mm(3)/mm) was counteracted by intimal regrowth (2.1 +/- 1.7 mm(3)/mm). The amount of intimal regrowth correlated directly with the intimal reduction due to the intervention (r = 0.76; P < 0.001), but not with the amount of additional stent expansion. In the (192)Ir-treated group, intimal regrowth was significantly less than in the placebo group (-0.3 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.7 mm(3)/mm; P < 0.001) despite a similar initial intimal reduction (1.3 +/- 0.9 vs. 1.6 +/- 1.4 mm(3)/mm; P = NS). No correlation was found between intimal reduction at the time of the procedure and intimal regrowth in the (192)Ir group. In this study, neointimal regrowth following treatment of ISR lesions correlates directly with the extent of acute intimal volume reduction, but not with the extent of additional stent expansion. This relation is not seen in ISR segments treated with radiation, where intimal regrowth is substantially inhibited.     

Three-year follow-up after intracoronary beta-radiation therapy for in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND: Most studies that proved intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) to be highly effective to reduce recurrent restenosis after treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) have looked at time periods up to 12 months. Whether the beneficial effect from radiation is sustained during long-term follow-up remains a concern. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of IRT using a beta-emitter during a 3-year follow-up period. METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight consecutive symptomatic patients (mean age, 63 +/- 11 years) with 134 in-stent restenotic lesions were treated for ISR with IRT (noncentred beta-emitter, Novoste; radiation dosis 21.1 +/- 3.1 Gy). Six-month angiographic follow-up was obtained in 104 patients (81%) with 105 lesions (78%). All patients underwent 36-month clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Six-month angiographic restenosis rate was 22% in stent (29% in lesion) with an in-stent late loss of 0.49 +/- 0.62 mm. Target lesion resvascularization (TLR) at 6-month follow-up was performed in 23 cases (18%). MACE (death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularisation) was observed in 24 patients (19%). At 36-month follow-up, TLR increased to 36 cases (28%) and MACE was observed in 47 patients (37%). In a multivariate analysis, minimal lumen diameter before treatment of ISR using IRT was the only predictor of recurrent TLR at 36 months (OR = 0.131; 95% CI, 0.068-0.254; p = 0.002). In a subgroup of patients (N = 15) without restenosis at 6-month angiography but with clinically driven recurrent late angiography (mean, 18 +/- 7 months); in-lesion late loss increased from 0.47 +/- 0.54 mm at 6 months to 1.27 +/- 0.76 mm at repeated angiography (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: There is a considerable number of delayed recurrent restenosis post IRT for ISR. This is due to ongoing late loss more than 6-month post IRT. The minimal lumen diameter before IRT predicts the need for recurrent TLR at 36 months.     

冠状动脉内192Ir射线对糖尿病患者支架内再狭窄复发治疗作用的血管内超声分析

目的用血管内超声(IVUS)分析冠状动脉(冠脉)内192Ir射线治疗对糖尿病患者支架内再狭窄(ISR)复发的作用机制及疗效. 方法 67例患者分为放疗组和对照组,在放疗后即刻和6个月后行冠脉造影和IVUS检查,术后随访1年. 结果两组术后6个月支架内的最小管腔内径、面积和平均面积均减少,分别为(-0.216±0.354)与(-0.679±0.467)mm、(-0.708±1.332)与(-2.482±1.542)mm2、(-0.546±1.366)与(-2.020±2.048)mm2,均为P＜0.01,对照组较放疗组的减少更为明显;两组治疗后的平均新生内膜面积和新生内膜百分比均增加,分别为(0.593±0.941)与(2.102±1.741)mm2、(10.48±18.46)与(38.29±36.76),均为P＜0.001,对照组较放疗组的增加更为明显;冠脉造影显示,放疗组的再狭窄复发率低于对照组(47.2%与84.2%,P＜0.01).术后1年,靶血管再成形术及靶病变再成形术的发生率放疗组也低于对照组(25.6%与56.5%,11.1%与37.5%,P＜0.05). 结论 IVUS分析证实,冠脉内192Ir射线可抑制支架内的新生内膜形成,减少糖尿病患者ISR的复发,并且降低1年靶血管及靶病变再次成形术的发生率.     

ISR II study: a long-term evaluation of sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with in-stent restenotic native coronary artery lesions.

The aim of this pilot study was to determine the safety and long-term efficacy of treating intrastent restenosis (ISR) with the slow-release sirolimus-eluting stent Bx Velocity (Cypher stent) without intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance. Of patients who received a bare metal stent implantation and presented an ISR, 30-80% of the patients will develop a second restenosis within the stent, at the stent edges or both. To date, intravascular brachytherapy using beta- and gamma-radiation has been the only effective treatment for ISR. Twenty-three patients with ISR and evidence of ischemia were treated with Cypher stent. Clinical information was collected 1, 8, 12, and 24 months after stent implantation. During the first 8 months of the study, in-stent lumen diameter remained essentially unchanged from postprocedure in 80% of the case. The target lesion repeat revascularization (TLR) was 17%, of which 50% were oculostenotic reflexes. Only one patient presented a restenosis greater than 70%. During the 2-year study period, the TLR rate was 17%; the major adverse coronary event rate was 26%, and the non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) rate was 9%. There were no reports of death, coronary artery bypass grafting, or Q-wave MI during the study. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using sirolimus-eluting stents without IVUS guidance for the treatment of ISR, providing long-term stability of immediate results.     

Insufficient tissue ablation by rotational atherectomy leads to worse long-term results in comparison with balloon angioplasty alone for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis: insights from the intravascular ultrasound substudy of the ARTIST randomized multicenter trial.

The ARTIST trial demonstrated a worse outcome for patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) treated with rotational atherectomy (RA) and adjunctive balloon angioplasty (PTCA) as compared to PTCA alone. This intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy compares effects of lumen enlargement and examines reasons for failure of RA in this setting. IVUS (n = 56) was performed after each interventional step and at follow-up. Volumetric lumen gain measured 79 +/- 68 mm(3) after PTCA (13 +/- 4 atm) as compared to 44 +/- 26 mm(3) after RA and adjunctive PTCA (7 +/- 3 atm; P < 0.0001). RA itself enlarged lumen by only 19 +/- 17 mm(3) and stent volume was 47% smaller as compared to high-pressure PTCA. Low-pressure strategy after RA did not prevent tissue growth during follow-up (19 +/- 25 vs. 36 +/- 38 mm(3); RA vs. PTCA; P = 0.09). Consequently, net lumen gain after PTCA was 82% higher compared to RA (46 +/- 54 vs. 25 +/- 24 mm(3); P = 0.09). Further stent expansion is the key mechanism to achieve luminal gain by PTCA of ISR. Neointimal ablation by RA has only minor effects. Low-pressure PTCA does not prevent recurrent tissue growth and failed for treatment of ISR due to insufficient stent expansion.     

Use of Taxus polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stents for treatment of in-stent restenosis in real world patients: results of clinical and angiographic follow-up at six months in a single-center registry.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stents in a real world group of unselected patients with coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions. METHODS: This is a prospective single-center registry of a consecutive series of 94 patients with 104 ISR lesions, without previous brachytherapy, over a period of 1 year. Quantitative coronary angiographic analyses were performed at baseline and at 6-month angiographic follow-up. Clinical follow-up were obtained at 6 months. RESULTS: Pre-intervention mean reference vessel diameter was 2.62 +/- 0.50 mm and mean lesion length was 13.95 +/- 6.78 mm. Baseline ISR patterns were mostly either Type I focal (32.7%) or Type II diffuse intrastent (48.1%). At 6-month angiographic follow-up, the in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis was 3.8% (4/105) and 7.6% (8/105) respectively, and the in-stent and in-segment late loss was 0.30 +/- 0.50 mm and 0.57 +/- 0.54 mm, respectively. Seven of these eight restenosed lesions had a diffuse or proliferative ISR pattern prior to intervention. Lesions that restenosed had longer mean stent length per lesion (37.3 mm vs. 22.5 mm in nonrestenosed group; P = 0.001) and more likely to have had a pattern of total occlusion pre-intervention (25.0% vs. 3.1% in nonrestenosed group; P = 0.046). At 6-month clinical follow-up, the MACE rate was 8.5% and target lesion revascularization rate was 7.4%. There was no death but subacute stent thrombosis occurred in 1 patient (1.1%) at 3 days after intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel-eluting Taxus stent for the treatment of ISR effectively suppresses recurrent neointimal proliferation, and was safe and efficacious at 6-month follow-up.     

Intravascular ultrasound analysis of beta radiation therapy for diffuse in-stent restenosis to inhibit intimal hyperplasia.

We evaluated the efficacy of beta-radiation therapy ((188)Re-MAG(3)) to inhibit intimal hyperplasia (IH) in diffuse in-stent restenosis by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis in 50 patients. Nine patients who did not agree with radiation therapy, and therefore underwent rotational atherectomy and balloon angioplasty for diffuse in-stent restenosis in the same study period, were selected for control groups. Serial IVUS comparisons were available in 44 of 50 patients with radiation therapy and 7 of 9 control patients. At 6-month follow-up, there was less significant increase of IH area in patients with radiation therapy than in control patients (Delta IH area = 0.1 +/- 0.8 mm(2) vs. 2.6 +/- 1.8 mm(2), P > 0.001 in mean values, and 0.6 +/- 1.4 mm(2) vs. 2.9 +/- 2.1 mm(2), P = 0.026 in values of follow-up lesion site, respectively). In conclusion, beta-radiation therapy might be an effective treatment modality to inhibit intimal hyperplasia in patients with diffuse in-stent restenosis.     

Efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound evaluation

BACKGROUND: The increase in the use of stents has seen the increasing emergence of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Reports suggest that the Cutting Balloon (Interventional Technologies, San Diego, California) may be a useful treatment modality for this new clinical entity. METHODS: In this study, we compared the efficacy of Cutting Balloon angioplasty (CBA) with conventional balloon angioplasty (PTCA) for ISR in 47 patients (47 lesions). Results were evaluated with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The CBA group included 25 patients (mean age, 65 +/- 78 years; 7 females) and the PTCA group included 22 patients (mean age, 69 +/- 51 years; 6 females). RESULTS: The procedural success rate was 100% in both groups. IVUS showed that luminal area acute gain was larger in the CBA group (2.5 +/- 0.8 mm2) compared to the PTCA group (1.8 +/- 1.0 mm2), while late loss was smaller in the CBA group (0.5 +/- 0.4 mm2) compared to the PTCA group (1.3 +/- 0.5 mm2). The change in total area was similar in both groups. The increase in area at the stented portion was 0.4 +/- 0.8 mm2 in the CBA group and 1.2 +/- 0.5 mm2 in the PTCA group. The restenosis rate at follow-up (mean follow-up, 5.4 months) was higher in PTCA patients (59%) than in the CBA patients (24%). CONCLUSION: CBA may result in no increase in total vessel area, a constant stent area, a decrease in plaque area, and an increase in lumen area (induced by the decrease in plaque area). Our IVUS findings suggest that compared to PTCA, the dilatation mechanism of CBA may be associated with reduced dilatation of both the total vessel area and the stent area for ISR. The mechanism of this modality may minimize injury to the intimal membrane and may potentially be a primary device for in-stent restenosis in the future.     

Sirolimus-eluting stent in chronic total occlusion: the SICTO study

Coronary stenting can significantly reduce the restenosis and reocclusion rates after successful balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusions (CTO). Nevertheless, recanalization of CTO remains among the worst predictors for in-stent restenosis and reocclusion. This multicenter, nonrandomized study assessed the safety and effectiveness of the CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stent in reducing angiographic in-stent late loss in totally occluded native coronary arteries. A total of 25 eligible patients were treated with the CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stent. Baseline clinical and angiographic data were collected and 6-month follow-up angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were performed. Clinical follow-up was required at 30 days, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Study stent implantation was successful in all patients, with a mean stent length of 28.4 +/- 11 mm. Six-month angiographic outcomes showed that mean lumen diameter stenosis did not change (2.22 +/- 0.56 mm postprocedure; 2.26 +/- 0.60 mm at 6 months follow-up; P = NS). Similarly, mean percent diameter stenosis did not change significantly (15.7 +/- 8.6% postprocedure, 19.3 +/- 11% at follow-up; P = NS). The absolute late lumen loss was -0.03 +/- 0.28 mm with a 6-month in-stent restenosis rate of 0%. IVUS follow-up revealed in-stent obstruction volume of only 4.9 +/- 6.8%. Long-term clinical follow-up showed target lesion revascularization at 12 months was only 4%, with target vessel revascularization of only 12%. The CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stent was safe and effective in the treatment of CTO compared to historical data with bare metal stents.     

Two-year follow-up of the quantitative angiographic and volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis after nonpolymeric paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation: late "catch-up" phenomenon from ASPECT Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study used serial angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis to evaluate the long-term efficacy of a nonpolymeric, paclitaxel-eluting stent coating on intimal hyperplasia (IH) 2 years after implantation. BACKGROUND: Long-term efficacy of patients treated with nonpolymeric paclitaxel-eluting stents beyond 1 year has not been well determined. METHODS: Patients were randomized to placebo or 1 of 2 doses of paclitaxel (low dose, 1.28 microg/mm2; high dose, 3.10 microg/mm2). Complete after-procedure, 6-month, and 2-year angiographic and IVUS data were available in 53 patients (17, 17, and 19 patients, respectively). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar among the 3 groups. Although 6-month minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was significantly smaller in placebo compared with paclitaxel-eluting stent patients (1.9 +/- 0.6 mm in placebo, 2.5 +/- 0.6 mm in low-dose, and 2.6 +/- 0.5 mm in high-dose patients, p = 0.004), the MLDs at 2 years were similar (2.3 +/- 0.6 mm, 2.3 +/- 0.7 mm, and 2.0 +/- 0.8 mm, respectively, p = 0.4). Despite a stepwise reduction in IH accumulation at 6 months (23 +/- 18 mm3 in placebo, 14 +/- 11 mm3 in low-dose, and 10 +/- 12 mm3 in high-dose, p = 0.017), the increase of IH volume from 6 months to 2 years was significantly greater in the high-dose patients (13 +/- 14 mm3 in high-dose vs. 4 +/- 7 mm3 in low-dose patients, p = 0.074; and vs. 1 +/- 13 mm3 in placebo, p = 0.019). Late target lesion revascularization (beyond 1 year) was performed in 2 high-dose patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the suppression of IH after non-polymeric paclitaxel-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents at 6 months, a "late catch-up" IH growth was found in the high-dose patients at 2-year follow-up.     

Mechanism of cutting balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound study.

We investigated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) the mechanism of action of cutting balloon (CB) angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis. Seventy-one consecutive restenotic lesions of 66 patients were studied by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and IVUS before, immediately after, and, in 20 cases, at 24-hr time interval after CB. CB was selected according to 1:1 CB-to-stent ratio and inflated at 8 atm for 60-90 sec. Both IVUS planar and volumetric (Simpson's rule, 25 patients) analysis were carried out. IVUS measurements included external elastic membrane area (EEMA), stent area (SA), minimal lumen area (MLA), and restenosis area (RA). Following CB, QCA analysis showed increase of minimal lumen diameter (1.17 +/- 0.46 vs. 2.45 +/- 0.51 mm; P < 0.0001) and decrease of diameter stenosis (64% +/- 13% vs. 21% +/- 9%; P < 0.0001). IVUS measurements showed a significant increase of MLA (2.18 +/- 0.80 vs. 7.31 +/- 1.8 mm(2); P < 0.0001), SA (9.62 +/- 2.6 vs. 10.7 +/- 2.75 mm(2); P < 0.0001), and EEMA (17.27 +/- 5 vs. 18.1 +/- 5 mm(2); P < 0.0001) and a decrease of RA (7.43 +/- 2.63 vs. 3.45 +/- 1.39 mm(2); P < 0.0001). No significant change was observed in the original plaque + media area (7.65 +/- 3 vs. 7.38 +/- 2.9 mm(2); P = NS). Thus, of the total lumen enlargement (5.13 +/- 1.85 mm(2)), 23% was the result of increase in mean SA, whereas 77% was the result of a decrease in mean RA. These changes were associated with a 5% increase in EEMA. IVUS volumetric changes paralleled planar variations. Angiographic and IVUS changes were well maintained at 24 hr. CB enlarges coronary lumen mainly by in-stent tissue reduction associated with a moderate degree of additional stent expansion. Favorable QCA and IVUS acute results are maintained at 24 hr.     

Efficacy and feasibility of helixcision for debulking neointimal hyperplasia for in-stent restenosis.

The Helixcision system is a novel 6 Fr-compatible catheter designed to debulk tissue for in-stent restenosis lesions. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and feasibility of this new system for removing neointimal hyperplasia. A total of 32 in-stent restenosis lesions in 32 patients were treated with helixcision followed by balloon angioplasty. Debulking efficacy was assessed with serial baseline intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in a subset of 18 lesions. To investigate longitudinal efficacy, 3D analysis was also performed in 12 lesions with automated pullback to calculate average cross-sectional areas across the stent. Prior to procedure, the angiographic reference diameter was 2.60 +/- 0.46 mm. Immediately after procedure, minimum lumen diameter improved from 0.84 +/- 0.33 to 2.19 +/- 0.41 mm (P < 0.0001). IVUS showed a significant reduction of intimal area (IA) after helixcision (from 4.95 +/- 2.04 to 2.88 +/- 1.48 mm(2); P < 0.001). Adjunctive balloon angioplasty further improved lumen area (LA) mainly by stent expansion rather than IA reduction at the site of minimum lumen area. The degrees of IA reduction and LA improvement were closely similar in volumetric analysis. Thirty-day and 6-month clinical follow-up were available in 97% (n = 31) and 72% (n = 23) of the enrolled patients, respectively. At 30-day follow-up, no major adverse cardiac event was reported except for periprocedural CK elevation in two patients (6%). Target legion revascularization within 6 months was performed in six patients (26%). Preliminary results of helixcision indicate that this system is safe and feasible for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. The concordant results between 2D and 3D IVUS analyses suggest that this unique technology can achieve uniform longitudinal debulking throughout the stent. The long-term outcomes appeared to be favorable, considering the relatively diffuse lesion morphology.     

Comparison of intravascular ultrasound and angiographic assessment of coronary reference segment size in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

During percutaneous coronary intervention, the reference segment is assessed angiographically. This report described the discrepancy between angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment of reference segment size in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Preintervention IVUS was used to study 62 de novo lesions in 41 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The lesion site was the image slice with the smallest lumen cross-sectional area (CSA). The proximal and distal reference segments were the most normal-looking segments within 5 mm proximal and distal to the lesion. Plaque burden was measured as plaque CSA/external elastic membrane (EEM) CSA. Using IVUS, the reference lumen diameter was 2.80 +/- 0.42 mm and the reference EEM diameter was 4.17 +/- 0.56 mm. The angiographic reference diameter was 2.63 +/- 0.36 mm. Mean difference between the IVUS EEM diameter and angiographic reference diameter was 1.56 +/- 0.55 mm. The mean difference between the IVUS reference lumen diameter and angiographic reference lumen diameter was 0.18 +/- 0.44 mm. Plaque burden in the reference segment correlated inversely with the difference between IVUS and quantitative coronary angiographic reference lumen diameter (slope = -0.12, 95% confidence interval -0.17 to -0.07, p <0.001), but it was not related to the absolute angiographic reference lumen diameter. Thus, reference segment diameters in type 2 diabetic patients were larger using IVUS than angiography, especially in the setting of larger plaque burden. In conclusion, these findings combined with inadequate remodeling may explain the angiographic appearance of small arteries in diabetic patients.     

Effects of intracoronary beta-radiation therapy after coronary angioplasty: an intravascular ultrasound study

BACKGROUND: Endovascular radiation is emerging as a potential solution for the prevention and treatment of restenosis. Its effects on the morphology of unstented vessels cannot be determined by angiography and therefore require the use of intravascular ultrasound. METHODS AND RESULTS: Through a 5F noncentered catheter for delivery of a 90Sr/Y source train, 12, 14, or 16 Gy at 2 mm was delivered to native coronary arteries after successful balloon angioplasty in 30 patients. Four patients required stent deployment in the first week. Quantitative coronary angiography and IVUS were performed during the initial procedure and at 6-month follow-up. Binary angiographic restenosis was present in 3 of 30 patients, with target lesion and vessel revascularization performed in 3 and 5 patients, respectively. Angiographic late loss was -0.02+/-0.60 mm, with a -0.09+/-0.46 loss index. IVUS demonstrated no significant reduction in lumen area (from 5.69+/-1.72 mm2 after treatment to 6. 04+/-2.63 mm2 at follow-up), with no significant change in external elastic membrane area (13.71+/-4.54 to 14.22+/-4.71 mm2) over the 6-month follow-up. Wall area was 8.01+/-3.85 mm2 after radiation therapy and 8.19+/-3.44 mm2 at follow-up (P=NS). No significant differences were noted between the different dose groups. CONCLUSIONS: beta-Radiation therapy resulted in a low restenosis rate with negligible late loss by angiography. By IVUS, beta-radiation was shown to inhibit neointima formation, with no reduction of total vessel area at 6-month follow-up.     

Impact of intracoronary radiation on in-stent restenosis involving ostial lesions.

The aim of this study was to compare 6-month clinical outcomes of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) involving the ostium treated with intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) compared to placebo therapy, and also to nonostial lesions treated with IRT. Coronary interventions in ostial lesions have a high rate of recurrence of restenosis. The impact of IRT on ostial ISR has been inadequately characterized. We assessed patients enrolled in gamma (192-iridium) and beta (90-yttrium, 32-phosphorus) radiation trials for ISR at the Washington Hospital Center. Of patients receiving IRT, 105 (8%) patients had ostial ISR and 1,289 (92%) patients had nonostial ISR. Twenty-seven patients had ostial ISR and received placebo therapy. Baseline demographic and angiographic and procedural details were similar, except ostial IRT patients had a trend toward shorter lesions (15.4 +/- 10.8 vs. 24.1 +/- 12.2 mm; P < 0.001) and had a higher rate of saphenous vein graft disease (46% vs. 19%; P < 0.001) compared to nonostial IRT patients. At 6 months, ostial lesions treated with IRT for ISR had a reduced rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared to ostial lesions treated with placebo (15% vs. 43%; P = 0.004). Outcomes at 6 months were similar for the ostial and nonostial IRT groups including TLR (15% vs. 14%; P = 0.80) and composite major adverse cardiac events (18% vs. 15%; P = 0.46). Intracoronary radiation therapy is effective for ostial in-stent restenotic lesions and should be comfortably used for this challenging anatomic location.     

Intravascular ultrasound-guided emergency coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent placement without post-procedural systemic anticoagulation.

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided stent placement and to determine the clinical outcome during the first 30 days in those patients who were treated with antiplatelet therapy rather than anticoagulants because they met the IVUS criteria for optimal stent placement. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. PATIENTS: 126 patients with successful, non-elective Palmaz-Schatz stent placement. INTERVENTIONS: IVUS was performed to assess the attachment of stent struts, the coverage of the dissection, and the intrastent minimal lumen area. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intrastent lumen area, clinical outcome during the first 30 days. RESULTS: In all patients IVUS showed complete apposition and coverage of the dissection. In 23 patients (18%) the IVUS lumen area criterion was achieved. In 75 patients, further balloon dilatation was performed and in 41 IVUS criteria were finally fulfilled. The minimal intrastent lumen area increased from a mean (SD) of 6.81 (1.15) mm2 to 9.56 (2.61) mm2 (P < or = 0.01) between the first and final IVUS investigations. 64 patients (51%) who met the IVUS criteria were treated with aspirin (100 mg) and ticlopidine (250 mg) twice a day. During the first 30 days none of the following events occurred: death, myocardial infarction, repeat intervention, aortocoronary bypass surgery, and subacute stent thrombosis. CONCLUSION: The additional information provided by IVUS examination helped the operator to decide whether further dilatation was needed after a coronary stent had been placed. For patients who met the IVUS criteria for optimal stent placement, antiplatelet therapy was associated with an excellent clinical outcome during the first 30 days.     

Volumetric intravascular ultrasound imaging to illustrate the extent of coronary plaque burden in type 2 diabetic patients

BACKGROUND: Although angiography is the gold standard for coronary imaging, its efficacy in outlining diffuse coronary atherosclerosis in diabetic patients remains questionable. We aimed to compare quantitative cineangiographic analysis (QCA) with three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: IVUS runs of 104 significant coronary lesions in 88 diabetic patients were performed. Arterial remodeling index was calculated as vessel area at minimal lumen area divided by mean reference vessel area. RESULTS: No difference between the two analysis modes was shown for lesion length and minimal lumen diameter, whereas a significant discrepancy between QCA and IVUS was found for diameter stenosis (10 +/- 9% vs. 41 +/- 8%; P<.001) and vessel diameter (3.01 +/- 0.66 vs. 4.53 +/- 0.70 mm; P<.001). A significant difference on arterial remodeling at lesion site was found between insulin-treated diabetic patients and non-insulin-treated diabetic patients (remodeling index: 0.98 +/- 0.16 vs. 1.07 +/- 0.21; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary angiographic diagnosis in diabetic patients may be distorted due to a large plaque burden over longer vessel segments and the resulting absence of plaque-free reference segments. This distortion was found to be more pronounced in QCA analysis requiring a reference diameter, whereas volumetric IVUS imaging illustrated coronary artery dimensions more accurately according to anatomic structures. Constrictive arterial remodeling was observed more frequently in type 2 diabetic patients treated with insulin.