Cervicography to triage women with borderline or mild dyskaryotic cervical PAP smears

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate six years experience using cervicography to triage women with borderline or mildly dyskaryotic PAP smears to either immediate colposcopy or cytological surveillance. METHOD: Retrospective study of 1,436 women referred to the cervicography clinic of the Whittington Hospital, London. Women with suspicious cervigrams were examined colposcopically and biopsied. Women with normal appearances at cervicography were followed-up with cytology over a period of a least two years. RESULTS: Cervicography detected 281 out of 307 women with CIN 2/3 and 215 out of 264 women with CIN 1. The sensitivity of cervicography to detect CIN 1, 2 or 3 in women with minor PAP smear abnormalities was 92%. The specificity was 39% and 847 (59%) of the women were referred for colposcopy; 215 (15%) were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Cervicography was a sensitive method to detect CIN in women with mild or borderline dyskaryosis on their PAP smears. However, the low specificity meant that a high proportion of the women were referred for colposcopy, and a significant proportion of women were lost to follow-up. Thus cervicography is not an efficient strategy for managing women with minor PAP smears abnormalities.     

Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy?

Summary. Significant premalignant disease of the cervix was found in 37% of women referred to a colposcopy clinic because of a smear that showed no more than mildly atypical cells, and in 49% of women whose smears showed mild dyskaryosis. This did not seem to be related to the number of times the abnormal smear had been repeated and was not confined to patients whose smears had been reported by only one laboratory. In another group of 102 women whose first abnormal smear was graded as atypical: 10 had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; 9 still had abnormal smears and 27 had been lost to follow-up, possibly because the potential importance of this finding was not recognised by the doctor to whom the smear report had been returned. Women with mildly atypical or mildly dyskaryotic smears are at considerable risk of having cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. All patients with a smear report showing dyskaryosis of any degree of severity should be referred for colposcopy. Those with atypical cytology should be referred for colposcopy if a second smear, repeated after 3 months, is not normal.     

Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy?

Significant premalignant disease of the cervix was found in 37% of women referred to a colposcopy clinic because of a smear that showed no more than mildly atypical cells, and in 49% of women whose smears showed mild dyskaryosis. This did not seem to be related to the number of times the abnormal smear had been repeated and was not confined to patients whose smears had been reported by only one laboratory. In another group of 102 women whose first abnormal smear was graded as atypical: 10 had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; 9 still had abnormal smears and 27 had been lost to follow-up, possibly because the potential importance of this finding was not recognised by the doctor to whom the smear report had been returned. Women with midly atypical or mildly dyskaryotic smears are at considerable risk of having cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. All patients with a smear report showing dyskaryosis of any degree of severity should be referred for colposcopy. Those with atypical cytology should be referred for colposcopy if a second smear, repeated after 3 months, is not normal.     

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia in adolescents with abnormal Pap smear results: a series report

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) in adolescents presenting for cervical colposcopy in an adolescent gynecology office. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review from 1999 to 2002 of the concomitant diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and VIN in our private general pediatric and adolescent practice in patients younger than 22 years of age who underwent cervical colposcopy as well as evaluation of the vulva secondary to gross and microscopic visualized lesions. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients underwent colposcopy for abnormal Pap smears; we found a 10% overall prevalence of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. Forty-four percent (n=27) underwent concomitant evaluation of the vulva; from these, 22% (n=6) fulfilled the characteristics of vulvar and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. CONCLUSION: In the presence of cervical cytology abnormalities, VIN may be more common than recognized and careful screening is definitely warranted.     

Psammoma bodies in a cervicovaginal smear associated with an intrauterine device. A case report

Psammoma bodies were found in a cervicovaginal smear, presumably related to the patient's use of an intrauterine device. Colposcopy, endocervical and uterine curettage, and laparoscopy with pelvic washings ruled out other conditions that may be associated with psammoma bodies.     

The accuracy of repeat cytology in women with mildly dyskaryotic smears

A special colposcopy clinic was established at the Royal Free Hospital to investigate women whose referral smears showed mild dyskaryosis. Of 200 women in the study, 66 (33%) had histologically proven CIN II or CIN III, 59 (29%) had CIN I or human papillomavirus changes, and 54 (27%) were considered normal. These findings demonstrate the importance of adequate diagnosis of this group of women. Of 143 women who had had a single mildly dyskaryotic smear, 45 (31%) had either CIN II or III. Age was not useful for predicting which women were at high risk of significant disease. Careful repeat cervical cytology correlated closely with the histological grade of the lesion. Repeat cytology was associated with an overall 24% false-negative rate, but most missed lesions were of low grade. Repeat cytology correctly identified 82% of all CIN lesions, and 93% of the most significant lesions (CIN II and III). Women who have a mildly dyskaryotic smear followed by a negative smear should not be considered normal, but careful repeat cytology can be considered a reasonably safe practice.     

The accuracy of repeat cytology in women with mildly dyskaryotic smears

Summary. A special colposcopy clinic was established at the Royal Free Hospital to investigate women whose referral smears showed mild dyskaryosis. Of 200 women in the study, 66 (33%) had histologically proven CIN II or CIN III, 59 (29%) had CIN I or human papillomavirus changes, and 54 (27%) were considered normal. These findings demonstrate the importance of adequate diagnosis of this group of women. Of 143 women who had had a single mildly dyskaryotic smear, 45 (31%) had either CIN II or III. Age was not useful for predicting which women were at high risk of significant disease. Careful repeat cervical cytology correlated closely with the histological grade of the lesion. Repeat cytology was associated with an overall 24% false-negative rate, but most missed lesions were of low grade. Repeat cytology correctly identified 82% of all CIN lesions, and 93% of the most significant lesions (CIN II and III). Women who have a mildly dyskaryotic smear followed by a negative smear should not be considered normal, but careful repeat cytology can be considered a reasonably safe practice.     

The Papanicolaou smear and the cervigram. A preliminary report

We reviewed the results of Papanicolaou smears and cervigrams obtained at the same session from 250 patients. Seven Papanicolaou smears were abnormal, and 56 cervigrams were abnormal. Fourteen cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I and two cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III were missed by the Papanicolaou smear but identified by cervicography.     

Endosalpingiosis as a source of psammoma bodies in a Papanicolaou smear. A case report.

Psammoma bodies are concentric, laminated structures produced by cross-sectioning the tips of calcified papillary formations and are usually associated with papillary carcinoma of the thyroid gland, meningiomas and serous papillary tumors of the ovary. These structures have occasionally been seen in cytologic smears obtained from women with endometrial or ovarian carcinoma. A woman had Papanicolaou smears that continued to show psammoma bodies for over two years, eventually leading to a hysterectomy. Even though the presence of psammoma bodies on a Papanicolaou smear should always alert the physician to the possibility of ovarian carcinoma, leading to a thorough search for this malignancy, a variety of benign conditions, such as endosalpingiosis, may also be associated with this finding.     

Macrocephaly-cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita: a report on the natural history of a mild case

Macrocephaly-cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita was first identified as a distinct syndrome in 1997. Since then there have been more than 10 further reports of the condition, several also comprising reviews of the earlier literature. Virtually all reported patients, however, are young children, and there is very little information about the natural evolution of the condition in adolescence and later life. This report describes a patient with features of macrocephaly-cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita, though mildly affected, and her progression into teenage life. Her mild problems, many of which have largely resolved, demonstrate a possible more optimistic view of the condition than is currently held. The difficulties in making the diagnosis in an adult patient are also discussed.     

Primary peritoneal carcinoma presenting as adenocarcinoma on a Pap smear. A case report

BACKGROUND: Primary peritoneal carcinoma is an uncommon malignancy that usually presents with gastrointestinal symptoms from abdominal carcinomatosis. CASE: A postmenopausal woman presented with vaginal bleeding and adenocarcinoma cells on a Pap smear. Colposcopy, endocervical and endometrial curettage, mammography, colonoscopy and pelvic ultrasound were all normal. Computed tomography revealed a large omental cake and ascites, and the CA-125 level was elevated, 2,907 IU/mL. Exploratory laparotomy revealed a primary peritoneal carcinoma with abdominal carcinomatosis. CONCLUSION: Primary peritoneal carcinoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of adenocarcinoma cells arising on a Pap smear in the absence of cervical and endometrial cancer.     

Dicentric marker derived from chromosome 22 associated with mild clinical signs: a case report

Amniocentesis performed after 24 weeks' gestation following ultrasonographic diagnosis of isolated unilateral hydronephrosis showed a de novo extra structurally abnormal chromosome in all cells examined. A combination of conventional and molecular cytogenetic techniques characterized the supernumerary marker as a dicentric and bisatellited marker derived from chromosome 22. At birth the infant presented hypoplasia of the right kidney, hearing loss on the left side and bilateral preauricular pits and skin tags. At three years, growth and neurological development were normal.