The North Carolina Obstetrics Access and Professional Liability Study: A Rural-Urban Analysis

During the 1980s a rapid rise in the costs of malpractice coverage for obstetrical services caused many practitioners to stop delivering babies. Other factors also influenced the decision by physicians to exclude obstetrics from their practices, including: increases in malpractice claims made against obstetrical providers and the subsequent fear of being sued; closures of hospital obstetrics units; issues involving Medicaid; and the daily stresses inherent in providing obstetrical care. Rural areas were particularly vulnerable to these factors. North Carolina was not unlike other states in recognizing a severe drop in access to obstetrical services in many communities, and policies were proposed to address this problem through tort reform, malpractice subsidies, and Medicaid program expansion. The exodus of obstetrical providers seemed especially critical in rural areas, and this article presents a metropolitan-nonmetropolitan analysis of the results of a survey of all obstetricians and gynecologists active and licensed to practice in North Carolina. The analysis is focused on provider responses to proposed policies and also examines the clinical support networks for these physicians to determine if this might also be an area for future policy activity. Important differences were found between rural and urban providers in terms of intensity of obstetrical practice, adequacy of backup, Medicaid participation and caseload, ideas about tort reform, and recent changes in obstetrical practice. The results indicate that policies to increase demand or income can help solve the rural obstetrical access problem but that states should pay equal attention to the clinical support system for practitioners.     

Availability of Rural Minnesota Obstetric Services: Is It a Problem?

In the late 1980s several published articles predicted a crisis in the availability of obstetric care due to declining numbers of rural obstetrical providers. Several state and national studies documented the adverse impact of malpractice and time demands on both urban and rural physicians. But only limited information is available to document current trends in rural obstetrical practice and assess whether or not the predicted crisis occurred. This study sought to provide that updated information for rural Minnesota. A telephone survey of all rural Minnesota obstetrical providers was used to document the number, location, and specialty of rural obstetrical providers, their practice limitations, and plans for future practice. This data was combined with state perinatal statistics for each county to further assess obstetrical care availability and perinatal outcomes. All rural Minnesota obstetricians and certified nurse midwives provide obstetrical care as did 69 percent of all rural family physicians. Only 27 percent of rural obstetrical providers put any type of restrictions on their obstetrical practices. During the past year, 67 currently practicing rural physicians have stopped providing obstetrical care while 55 new obstetrical providers have begun rural practice. Two to 3 percent of current rural providers plan to retire or discontinue obstetrical services during the next five years. The provider demographics from the survey identified eight counties with no prenatal providers, and 12 additional communities of decreased provider availability. However, only two of the counties with no prenatal providers and five of the counties with areas of limited providers had increased percentages of adverse prenatal outcomes such as low birthweight or late prenatal care. This study concluded that Minnesota does not have a serious statewide problem with availability of rural obstetrical providers. However, a few isolated regions of the state have limited provider availability, including limited availability of local high-risk services and consultants.     

Relationship of infant mortality to the availability of obstetrical care in Indiana.

BACKGROUND. Projects that are currently under way in Indiana to improve access to obstetrical care have not addressed the availability of these services in nonmetropolitan areas. This study was designed to identify all physicians who were providing obstetrical services in every county throughout the state to determine if there is a correlation between the availability of these services and the infant mortality rate in nonmetropolitan counties. METHODS. A state-wide physician profile maintained by the Indiana Academy of Family Physicians was cross-referenced with a telephone survey of all hospitals in the state to identify those physicians providing obstetrical services within each county in Indiana. The number of physicians in each county was then compared with the number of births per year by mothers from that county to determine whether nonmetropolitan counties had sufficient physicians to provide obstetrical services. Finally, these findings were compared with the most recent infant mortality rate for each nonmetropolitan county. RESULTS. A total of 610 family physicians, 311 obstetricians, and 75 general practitioners were providing obstetrical care in Indiana. There were 10 counties that did not have a physician who delivered babies practicing in that county. Thirty-two counties had more women who needed obstetrical care than the current number of physicians could serve. There was a negative correlation between physician availability and infant mortality in Indiana's nonmetropolitan counties (r = -.38; P less than .02). CONCLUSIONS. Access to care for pregnant patients is a major problem in rural Indiana and hampers Indiana's ability to reduce its current infant mortality rate.     

Impact of Physicians'' Perceptions of Malpractice and Adaptive Changes on Intention to Cease Obstetrical Practice

Physicians who provide obstetrical care in rural areas face exposure to liability action and confront a critical decision--whether to continue to offer these services. This paper draws upon social-psychological and decision theories to investigate this decision. Ninety-four percent of all obstetricians and family and general physicians practicing in the 12 nonmetropolitan counties of one state responded to a mail survey that asked about their intention to continue or discontinue obstetrical practice, two dimensions of subjective risk (perceived likelihood of threats in the malpractice environment and perceived magnitude of negative consequences from being sued), and adaptive changes to protect against malpractice. The results suggest that (a) perceived extent of negative consequences (but not perceived likelihood of malpractice threats) drives intention to leave obstetrics, (b) the professional and reputational impacts of a suit--not the dollar amount of award or settlement--predicts intention to stop practicing obstetrics, and (c) physicians planning to continue providing obstetrical care in the future have made recent practice changes that may further exacerbate access problems.     

Child participation in WIC: Medicaid costs and use of health care services

OBJECTIVES: We used data from birth certificates, Medicaid, and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) to examine the relationship of child participation in WIC to Medicaid costs and use of health care services in North Carolina. METHODS: We linked Medicaid enrollment, Medicaid paid claims, and WIC participation files to birth certificates for children born in North Carolina in 1992. We used multiple regression analysis to estimate the effects of WIC participation on the use of health care services and Medicaid costs. RESULTS: Medicaid-enrolled children participating in the WIC program showed greater use of all types of health care services compared with Medicaid-enrolled children who were not WIC participants. CONCLUSIONS: The health care needs of low-income children who participate in WIC may be better met than those of low-income children not participating in WIC.     

Addressing barriers to perinatal care: a case study of the Access to Maternity Care Committee in Washington State

Access to obstetrical services has deteriorated in recent years, as large numbers of physicians have discontinued or restricted obstetrical practice. In Washington State, one response to this access crisis has been the establishment of the Access to Maternity Care Committee (AMCC), an ad hoc group composed primarily of private sector obstetrical providers and representatives of State government responsible for the delivery of health care to women and children. The major objectives of the AMCC is to improve access to obstetrical services for socially vulnerable women, both rural inhabitants and the medically indigent. The committee has been successful in serving as a forum in which to resolve many of the administrative problems that have arisen between private sector obstetrical providers and the State's Medicaid Program, the major source of payment for the one-third of pregnant women who are medically indigent. Building upon the trust that the committee members developed in working together, the AMCC served as a major force in persuading the State legislature to expand substantially its investment in perinatal care by increasing Medicaid eligibility, raising provider reimbursement, and improving social service for pregnant women. Such ad hoc coalitions between the private and public sector may be quite effective in addressing obstetrical access problems in other States.     

The effect of two publicly funded insurance programs on use of dental services for young children

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the use of dental services for preschool aged children enrolled in North Carolina Medicaid, a traditional program based on a fee-for-service schedule, and North Carolina Health Choice (NCHC), an State Children's Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP) dental insurance program structured similarly to private insurance. STUDY POPULATION: All children (165,858) 1-5 years of age enrolled in Medicaid and S-CHIP (NCHC) at some time during one study year (October 1, 1999-September 30, 2000). DATA SOURCES/EXTRACTION METHODS: Medicaid and NCHC enrollment and dental claims files were obtained for individual children. STUDY DESIGN: An observational study with a retrospective cohort design. Use of dental services for each child was measured as having at least one dental claim during the outcome period (October 1, 1999-September 30, 2000). Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to compare the effect of two differently administered insurance programs on the use of dental services, controlling for demographic, enrollment, and county characteristics. PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: Children enrolled solely in S-CHIP (NCHC) were 1.6 times more likely (95 percent confidence intervals (CI)=1.50-1.79) to have a dental visit than those enrolled solely in Medicaid. Prediction models for children enrolled for 12 months indicated that those enrolled in S-CHIP (NCHC) had a significantly higher probability of having a dental visit (50 percent) than those enrolled in both plans (44 percent) or Medicaid only (39 percent), a trend found in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: The S-CHIP (NCHC) program appears to provide children with increased access to dental care compared to children in the Medicaid program.     

Rebuilding a rural obstetrical program: a case study.

The rebuilding of an obstetrical department of a small rural hospital (40 beds) in rural Nevada is described. The number of births at the hospital increased from 20 in 1981 to more than 300 for the past four years. The market share of obstetrical patients in the county increased from less than 10 percent in 1981, to an average of 80 percent for the last five years. The five major steps contributing to the success of this rebuilding program are described. Obstetrical malpractice liability insurance and the shaky financial viability of rural hospitals are discussed as the two major threats to rebuilding a rural obstetrical program. The experience in this setting suggests that rural residents want and desire local obstetrical care and that a team approach can rebuild a rural obstetrical capacity in a relatively short time.     

Educational and health services innovation to improve care for rural Hispanic communities in the US

BACKGROUND: Access to comprehensive and quality health care services is difficult for socioeconomically disadvantaged groups in rural regions. Barriers to health care for rural Latinos include lack of insurance, language barriers and cultural differences. For the Latino immigrant population in rural areas, barriers to access are compounded. HEALTH NEEDS OF RURAL AREAS: THE CASE OF WALHALLA, SC: The town of Walhalla, South Carolina is a rural community located in Oconee County, the northwest corner of the state. Disparities exist between rural and urban residents in several health categories, and these disparities illustrate the need to provide competent, appropriate and affordable healthcare to rural populations. The Hispanic population of Oconee has dramatically increased in the past decade, and the majority of these immigrants have no health insurance and have limited access to health services. DESIGNING A PROGRAM TO FIT THE COMMUNITY--THE "WALHALLA EXPERIENCE": The purpose of the Accessible and Culturally Competent Health Care Project (ACCHCP) is to provide care for underserved populations in Oconee County, South Carolina while providing rural educational opportunities for health services students. Funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration of DHHS, the program is designed to offer culturally appropriate, sensitive, accessible, affordable and compassionate care in a mobile clinic setting. In this interdisciplinary program, nurse practitioners, health educators, bilingual interpreters, medical residents and Clemson University students and professors all played key roles. Women in the community also serve as Promotoras or lay health advisors. The program is unique in using educational initiatives and innovative strategies for bringing health care to this underserved community and offers important information for rural health care initiatives targeting minority groups. This paper reports on the challenges and successes in the development and implementation of the ACCHCP program in Walhalla, South Carolina.     

Health services access and use among older adults in North Carolina: urban vs rural residents.

OBJECTIVES. This study compared health service use and satisfaction with health care among older adults living in urban vs rural counties in North Carolina. METHODS. A stratified random sample of 4162 residents of one urban and four rural counties of North Carolina was surveyed to determine urban/rural variation in inpatient and outpatient health service use, continuity of care and satisfaction with care, and barriers (transportation, cost) to care. RESULTS. Inpatient and outpatient service use did not vary by residence in controlled analyses. Continuity of care was more frequent in rural counties. Transportation was not perceived as a barrier to health care more frequently in rural than in urban counties, but cost was a greater barrier to care among rural elderly people. CONCLUSIONS. In this sample, older persons living in rural counties within reasonable driving distance of urban counties with major medical centers used health services as frequently and were as satisfied with their health care as persons in urban counties. Cost of care, however, was a significant and persistent barrier among rural elderly people, despite Medicare coverage.     

Socialized medicine: a solution to the cost crisis in health care in the United States

Despite growing concern with cost containment, most health policy analysts have ignored vast potential savings on medically irrelevant spending for excess administration, profits, high physician incomes, marketing, and legal involvement in medicine. Indeed, many recent reforms encourage administrative hypertrophy, entrepreneurialism and litigation. A universal national health program could abolish billing and consequently the need for much of the administrative apparatus of health care, and decrease spending for profits and marketing. In this article we analyze the administrative savings that could be realized from instituting a Canadian-style national health insurance program or a national health service similar to that in Britain, and the potential savings from additional reforms to curtail profits, marketing and litigation. Our calculations based on 1983 data suggest that national health insurance would save $42.6 billion annually: $29.2 billion on health administration and insurance overhead, $4.9 billion on profits, $3.9 billion on marketing, and $4.6 billion on physician's incomes. A national health service would save $65.8 billion: $38.4 billion on health administration and insurance overhead, $4.9 billion on profits, $3.9 billion on marketing, and $18.6 billion on physician's incomes. Complete nationalization of all health related industries and reform of the malpractice system would save at least $87.2 billion per year. We conclude that a national health program, in addition to improving access to health care for the oppressed, could achieve cost containment without rationing of care.     

Safety Practices Among Limited Resource Farmers in North Carolina

SUMMARY

The purpose of our NC Farm Safety Project is to reduce the incidence of farm injuries and illnesses among limited resource farmers in North Carolina by implementing an intervention program that stresses educational strategies. Limited resource farmers in the state are identified as farm families, who have a combined gross income of less-than $50,000 per year. A pilot-test was conducted to determine the educational safety programs needed by limited resource farmers in North Carolina. The target population in the pilot survey consisted of 2656 limited resource farmers representing 26 counties. Of this population, 335 were selected to participate in a farm injuries and illness telephone survey.

Some conclusions drawn are: (1) only a fourth of the farmers had medical insurance and they were mostly part-time farmers, (2) most of the farmers indicated that they were interested in participating in a farm machinery safety workshop, and (3) only a third of the farmers had first aid kits.     

Programming, budgeting, and control in the North Carolina "Willie M." program: a case of public sector accountability

In eight years of program operation, the State of North Carolina has spent upwards of $200 million on its Willie M. program. In doing so, the state has developed a model program of services for severely emotionally disturbed children. This paper describes the program legacy wrought by the Willie M. class action suit against the State of North Carolina. The response of the state is reported in terms of the programming, budgeting, and control challenges generated by North Carolina's voluntary settlement of the suit.     

Educational and health services innovation to improve care for rural Hispanic communities in the USA

BACKGROUND: Access to comprehensive and quality healthcare services is difficult for socioeonomically disadvantaged groups in rural regions. Barriers to health care for rural Latinos include lack of insurance, language barriers and cultural differences. For the Latino immigrant population in rural areas, barriers to access are compounded. HEALTH NEEDS OF RURAL AREAS: THE CASE OF WALHALLA, SC: The town of Walhalla, South Carolina, USA, is a rural community located in Oconee County, the northwest corner of the state. Disparities exist between rural and urban residents in several health categories, and these disparities illustrate the need to provide competent, appropriate and affordable healthcare to rural populations. The Hispanic population of Oconee has dramatically increased in the past decade, and the majority of these immigrants have no health insurance and have limited access to health services. DESIGNING A PROGRAM TO FIT THE COMMUNITY--THE "WALHALLA EXPERIENCE": The purpose of the Accessible and Culturally Competent Health Care Project (ACCHCP) is to provide care for underserved populations, in Oconee County, South Carolina while providing rural educational opportunities for health services students. Funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration of DHHS, the program is designed to offer culturally appropriate, sensitive, accessible, affordable and compassionate care in a mobile clinic setting. In this interdisplinary program, nurse practitioners, health educators, bilingual interpreters, medical residents and Clemson University students and professors all played key roles. Women in the community also serve as promotoras or lay health advisors. The program is unique in using educational initiatives and innovative strategies for bringing health care to this underserved community and offers important information for rural healthcare initiatives targeting minority groups. This article reports on the challenges and successes in the development and implementation of the ACCHCP program in Walhalla, South Carolina.     

Medicaid and SCHIP coverage: findings from California and North Carolina

This article examines experiences under Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), drawing on surveys of over 3,000 enrollees in California and North Carolina in 2002. In both States, Medicaid enrollees were less likely than SCHIP enrollees to have parents who were covered by employer-sponsored insurance (ESI). With the exception of dental care and provider perceptions, access experiences were fairly comparable across the two programs, despite differences in the characteristics of the children served by the two programs. Relative to being uninsured, Medicaid enrollment was found to improve access to care along a number of different dimensions, controlling for other factors. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the need for continued evaluation of access to care for both programs.     

Medicaid and SCHIP coverage: findings from California and North Carolina

This article examines experiences under Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), drawing on surveys of over 3,000 enrollees in California and North Carolina in 2002. In both States, Medicaid enrollees were less likely than SCHIP enrollees to have parents who were covered by employer-sponsored insurance (ESI). With the exception of dental care and provider perceptions, access experiences were fairly comparable across the two programs, despite differences in the characteristics of the children served by the two programs. Relative to being uninsured, Medicaid enrollment was found to improve access to care along a number of different dimensions, controlling for other factors. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the need for continued evaluation of access to care for both programs.     

Mid-level practitioners in rural health care

The use of mid-level practitioners (nurse practitioners, physician's assistants, and so on) is advocated to improve the access of rural people to health care. A remote rural area of southern Appalachia is served by a network of three clinics staffed by mid-level practitioners (MLPs) and an M.D. During the first three years of operation 76% of the geographically defined target population of 5,500 received services. MLPs provided care in half of the 40,252 medical encounters and 89% of their contacts were managed without consultation with or referral to the M.D. They managed 36% of first-year visits, 51% of second-year visits, and 54% of third-year visits. Concurrent with this shift in patient care responsibility from M.D. to MLP, differences in the types of conditions managed by M.D. and MLP decreased with time. Population surveys indicate that consumer satisfaction with MLP services is high and that health care from this system is perceived as being more accessible than care from alternative sources. In this setting the role of the MLP evolved in the direction of, but was not limited to, that of an M.D. substitute. Experience with this delivery system suggests that, as members of a health care team, MLPs can manage a majority of problems encountered in rural primary care with a high level of consumer satisfaction and improved access.Dr. Blake is a Clinical Scholar in the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine; his address is Clinical Scholars Program, Wing B, Building 207 H, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514. Ms. Guild is a Research Associate in the Health Services Research Center and Adjunct Instructor in the Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina.     

The Effect of Malpractice Liability on the Delivery of Rural Obstetrical Care*

A telephone survey of all non-governmental obstetricians, family physicians, general practitioners, and osteopathic physicians in rural Arizona was undertaken to determine the effect of medical liability issues on the availability of rural obstetrical services. One hundred ninety-one (88.8%) responded, and after exclusion of those who had never provided obstetrical care, 126 physicians remained for evaluation. These included 32 obstetricians, 55 family physicians, 25 general practitioners, and 14 osteopaths. During the past three years, 26 (20.6%) had discontinued providing obstetrical services, citing liability issues as the reason. An additional 12 physicians (9–5%) planned to discontinue obstetrics upon expiration of their 1986 malpractice insurance policy. By the end of 1986, the number of obstetrical providers in rural Arizona will have decreased by 30.1 percent. Women in many rural areas already have pregnancy outcomes that are inferior to their urban counterparts. A further decrease in the availability of obstetrical providers may have additional adverse effects on pregnancy outcomes.     

Health Care Utilization Patterns for Young Children in Rural Counties of the I‐95 Corridor of South Carolina

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess health care utilization patterns for young children with Medicaid insurance in the rural counties of the I‐95 corridor in South Carolina relative to other regions of the state. We hypothesize that young children received less well care and higher levels of tertiary care in the rural counties along the I‐95 corridor (I‐95) of South Carolina. Design/Methods: A Medicaid cohort of children less than 3 years of age was used to compare Early, Periodic, Diagnosis, Screening and Treatment (EPSDT) visits; preventable emergency department (ED) visits; and inpatient visits between I‐95, other rural and urban county groupings. Results: The adjusted odds of a child having had 80% of the recommended EPSDT visits were reduced for I‐95 compared to other rural counties. The odds of a preventable inpatient or ED visit were increased for all rural counties, with the highest rates in the other rural counties. Conclusions: Children accessed well care less in the I‐95 corridor compared to other rural areas of South Carolina. Rural children accessed tertiary care more often than urban children, a finding most prominent outside the I‐95 corridor, likely attributable to more available access of tertiary care in rural counties outside the I‐95 corridor.