Effect of 2% chlorhexidine on dentin microtensile bond strengths and nanoleakage of luting cements

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of pre-treatment by chlorhexidine on the microtensile bond strength (mTBS) of resin cements and nanoleakage at the resin–dentine interfaces.

Methods

Cylindrical composite blocks were luted to human dentine using resin cements (RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE: ARC; Panavia F, Kuraray Medical Inc.: PF; RelyX Unicem, 3M ESPE: UN) with/without pre-treatment by 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CAVITY CLEANSER, Bisco, Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA). CAVITY CLEANSER was applied on the acid etched dentine for 60 s in the ARC group, and on smear layer-covered dentine in the PF and UN groups. After storage in water for 24 h, the bonded teeth were sectioned into 1 mm thick slabs and further into 0.9 mm × 0.9 mm beams. After immersion in water or ammoniacal silver nitrate for 24 h, the beams were stressed to failure in tension. The fractured surfaces were examined by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) using backscattered electron mode. The silver-stained slabs were used to examine nanoleakage within the bonded interface by FE-SEM.

Results

The resin cement and chlorhexidine treatment had significant effects (p < 0.0001) on mTBS; while the storage media had no significant effect (p = 0.435). The mTBS of ARC was significantly higher than the other cements. Chlorhexidine reduced mTBS and produced pronounced nanoleakage when PF and UC were luted to dentine.

Conclusions

Pre-treatment with chlorhexidine affected the integrity of dentine bonding with PF and UC, while there was no adverse effect on coupling of ARC.     

Effect of surface preparation on bond strength of resin luting cements to dentin

This study examined the effects of using two different burs for dentin surface preparation on the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) of three resin luting cements. Flat, deep dentin surfaces from 45 extracted human third molars were divided into three groups (n = 15) according to bur type: (i) diamond bur and (ii) tungsten carbide bur. The controls were abraded with #600-grit SiC paper. Both burs operated in a high-speed handpiece under water-cooling. Composite blocks were luted onto the dentin using one of three cements: RelyX ARC (ARC, 3M ESPE), Panavia F2.0 (PF, Kuraray) and RelyX Unicem (UN, 3M ESPE) following the manufacturers' instructions. For ARC, the dentin surface was treated with 32% phosphoric acid. The bonded specimens were stored at 37 degrees C for 24 hours and sectioned into 0.9 x 0.9 mm beams for microTBS testing. The data were analyzed using the two-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests. Representative fractured beams from each group were prepared for fractographic analysis under SEM. Two-way ANOVA revealed that the effects of "dentin surface preparation" and "luting cement" were statistically significant (p < 0.001); however, the interaction of these two factors was not significant (p > 0.05). ARC showed no significant difference in microTBS among the three differently prepared dentin surfaces. The microTBS of PF and UN was significantly lower when bonding to dentin prepared with a diamond bur (p < 0.05), compared to the control. For Panavia F2.0, higher bond strengths were achieved on the dentin surface prepared with a tungsten carbide bur. Proper bur selection is essential to optimizing the dentin adhesion of self-etch resin luting cements.     

Nanoleakage,ultramorphological characteristics,and microtensile bond strengths of a new low-shrinkage composite to dentin after artificial aging

ObjectivesTo study the microtensile bond strengths and nanoleakage of low-shrinkage composite to dentin. The null hypotheses tested were (1) aging does not affect the bonding of low-shrinkage composite; (2) there is no difference in microtensile bond strengths and nanoleakage using different bonding strategies.Methods32 extracted molars were assigned to one of four groups: LS System Adhesive (LS, 3M ESPE); dentin etched for 15 s with phosphoric acid + LS System Adhesive (LSpa); Adper Single Bond Plus (SB, 3M ESPE); SB + LS Bond (SBLS). Occlusal dentin was exposed and restored with Filtek LS (3M ESPE). The samples were tested after 24 h or after 20,000 thermocycles and 6 months of aging. Teeth were sectioned with a cross-section of 0.8 ± 0.2 mm² and fractured at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were submitted to ANOVA/Duncan's post hoc test, at p < 0.05. Five slabs from each group were selected and immersed in 50 wt% ammoniacal silver nitrate. Then, specimens were processed for SEM, the silver penetration was measured and data analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis at p < 0.05.ResultsNo statistically significant difference was found among the experimental groups for the factor dentin treatment (p = 0.165) and aging (p = 0.091). All experimental groups exhibit some degree of nanoleakage. There was no adhesion of Filtek LS applied directly over dentin surfaces treated with SB.SignificanceThe new low-shrinkage resin composite showed compatibility only with its dedicated adhesive. Pre-etching did not improve the bond strengths to low-shrinkage resin composite. Some degree of nanoleakage was evident in all groups.     

Mechanical properties of new self-adhesive resin-based cement

PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare the bonding strength, flexural strength, elastic modulus, water absorption and the expansion after water storage of new self-adhesive resin cements to commercially available dental cements.MethodsTwo types (hand-mix and auto-mix) of new self-adhesive resin cements (SAC-H and SAC-A, Kuraray Medical), one conventional resin cement (Panavia F2.0), three self-adhesive resin cements (Relyx Unicem, Maxcem and G-Cem), and two resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Fuji Luting S and Vitremer) were used. Shear bond strengths, flexural strengths and elastic moduli (ISO 4049), water absorption (ISO 4049), and the expansion rate after water storage were investigated.ResultsBoth SAC-H and SAC-A provided adhesion to enamel and dentin, and had the same bond strength to gold alloy and zirconia as conventional resin cements. SAC-H and SAC-A had greater flexural strengths (86.4–93.5 MPa) than commercial self-adhesive resin cements or glass-ionomer cements. The elastic moduli of self-adhesive and glass-ionomer cements were 5.2–7.4 GPa and 2.3–3.4 GPa, respectively. The water absorption of SAC-H and SAC-A (26.3–27.7 μg/mm³) were significantly lower than commercial self-adhesive resin cements. SAC-H and SAC-A showed significantly lower expansion rates (0.17–0.26%) than commercial self-adhesive cements and glass-ionomer cements after 4 weeks water storage.ConclusionsIt is suggested that the new self-adhesive resin cements exhibited a favorable bonding capability and mechanical properties.     

Self-adhesive resin cement versus zinc phosphate luting material: A prospective clinical trial begun 2003

ObjectivesThe literature demonstrates that conventional luting of metal-based restorations using zinc phosphate cements is clinically successful over 20 years. This study compared the clinical outcomes of metal-based fixed partial dentures luted conventionally with zinc phosphate and self-adhesive resin cement.MethodsForty-nine patients (mean age 54 ± 13 years) received 49 metal-based fixed partial dentures randomly luted using zinc phosphate (Richter & Hoffmann, Berlin, Germany) or self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem Aplicap, 3M ESPE, Germany) at the University Medical Center Regensburg. The core build-up material was highly viscous glass ionomer; the finishing line was in dentin. The study included 42 posterior, 5 anterior crowns and two onlays. Forty-seven restorations were made of precious alloys, 2 of non-precious alloys. The restorations were clinically examined every year. The clinical performance was checked for plaque (0–5; PI, Quigley-Hein), bleeding (0–4; PBI; Mühlemann) and attachment scores. The examination included pulp vitality and percussion tests.StatisticsMeans of scores, standard deviation, cumulative survival and complication rates were calculated using life tables.ResultsThe mean observation time was 3.16 ± 0.6 years (min: 2.0; max: 4.5 years). During that time no restoration was lost, no recementation became necessary. One endodontic treatment was performed in the self-adhesive composite group after 2.9 years. At study end bleeding (1.44 RelyX Unicem vs. 1.25 zinc phosphate) and plaque (1.64 RelyX Unicem vs. 1.0 zinc phosphate) scores showed no statistically significant difference.SignificanceThe self-adhesive resin cement performed clinically as well and can be used as easily as zinc phosphate cement to retain metal-based restorations over a 38-month observation period.     

Microhardness of resin cements in the intraradicular environment: Effects of water storage and softening treament

ObjectivesTo analyze the microhardness of four dual-cure resin cements used for cementing fiber-reinforced posts under the following conditions: after 7 days of storage in water, after additional 24 h of immersion in 75% ethanol, and after 3 months of storage in water. Hardness measurements were taken at the cervical, middle and apical thirds along the cement line.MethodsRoot canals of 40 bovine incisors were prepared for post space. Fibrekor^® glass fiber-reinforced posts (Jeneric/Pentron) of 1 mm in diameter were cemented using Panavia F 2.0 (Kuraray), Variolink (Ivoclar-Vivadent), Rely X Unicem (3M ESPE) or Duolink (Bisco) (N = 10). After 7 days of water storage at 37 °C, half the sample (N = 5) was longitudinally sectioned and the initial microhardness measured along the cement line from cervical to apex. These same samples were further immersed in 75% ethanol for 24 h and reassessed. The remaining half (N = 5) was kept unsectioned in deionized water at 37 °C for 3 months, followed by sectioning and measuring. Data were analyzed by a series of two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests at α = 5%.ResultsStatistically significant differences were identified among the cements, thirds and conditions. Significant interactions were also observed between cements and thirds and between cements and conditions. Panavia F exhibited significantly higher initial microhardness than the other three cements, which showed no statistical difference among themselves. Variolink and Duolink showed significantly higher microhardness values in the cervical third, without significant difference among the thirds for the other cements. Immersion in ethanol significantly reduced the hardness values for all cements, regardless of the thirds. Storage in water for 3 months had no influence on the hardness of most of the cements, with the exception of Unicem that showed a significant increase in the hardness values after this period.SignificanceResults showed heterogeneity in the microhardness of the cements inside the canal. All cements presented some degree of softening after ethanol treatment, which suggests instability of the polymer. The quality of curing of resin cements in the root canal environment seems unpredictable and highly material dependent.     

Effect of saliva contamination on bond strength of resin luting cements to dentin

Objectives

This study examined the effect of saliva contamination on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of resin luting cements to dentin.

Methods

For RelyX ARC (ARC, 3M ESPE), dentin surfaces were etched with 32% phosphoric acid. The subgroups were: ARC-control (uncontaminated), ARC-I (saliva contamination, blot-dried), ARC-II (saliva contamination, rinse, blot-dried) and ARC-III (saliva contamination, rinse, re-etch, rinse, blot-dried). For Panavia F 2.0 (PF, Kuraray), the subgroups were: PF-control (uncontaminated), PF-I (saliva contamination, dried), PF-II (saliva contamination, rinse, dried), PF-III (primer, saliva contamination, dried), PF-IV (primer, saliva contamination, dried, primer re-applied) and PF-V (primer, saliva contamination, rinse, dried, primer re-applied). Composite blocks were luted onto dentin using the two cements. Bonded specimens were sectioned into 0.9 mm × 0.9 mm beams for μTBS testing. Representative fractured beams were prepared for fractographic analysis.

Results

For ARC, salivary contamination of etched dentin (ARC-I) significantly lowered bond strength (p = 0.001). Rinsing saliva off with water (ARC-II) restored bond strength to control level. Re-etching dentin surface after rinsing (ARC-III) resulted in the lowest bond strength (p < 0.001). For PF, salivary contamination of dentin before (PF-I) and after application of primer (PF-III and PF-IV) significantly lowered bond strength (p < 0.001). Rinsing saliva off with water and re-application of primer (PF-II and PF-V) improved bond strength.

Conclusion

Saliva contamination during luting deteriorated the bond quality of resin cements. Decontamination by rinsing with water was most effective in restoring the bond strength of RelyX ARC. Decontamination by water-rinsing and primer re-application after rinsing improved the bond strength of Panavia F 2.0.     

Acoustic emission analysis of the effect of simulated pulpal pressure and cavity type on the tooth–composite interfacial de-bonding

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of in vitro pulpal pressure and cavity type on the tooth–composite bonding interface by means of acoustic emission (AE) analysis.MethodsClasses I and II cavities on extracted third molars were prepared and assigned to four groups of seven teeth each: (1) direct composite restoration without simulated pulpal pressure (SPP) in class I cavity, (2) direct composite restoration with SPP in class I cavity, (3) direct composite restoration without SPP in class II cavity, (4) direct composite restoration with SPP in class II cavity. The teeth were restored with Filtek Z250 composite and Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose adhesive system (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). AE events were recorded for 2000 s during light-curing. Groups 2 and 4 were subjected to 20 cm H₂O hydrostatic pressure throughout the procedures. The data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA. After the AE test, teeth were sectioned longitudinally in mesio-distal direction, the tooth–composite interface was examined using SEM.ResultsSPP in Groups 2 (4.57 ± 1.40) and 4 (3.43 ± 1.13) yielded significantly higher AE events number than those of Groups 1 (3.43 ± 1.51) and 3 (1.71 ± 0.95) where the SPP was not applied (p < 0.05). The number of AE events of class I cavity in Groups 1 and 2 were significantly higher than those of class II cavity in Groups 3 and 4 (p < 0.05). SEM examination showed that all groups had intact enamel–composite interface, while micro-gaps were observed at the dentin–composite interface, mainly at the pulpal floor of the cavity. The class I cavities with SPP in Group 2 showed wider gaps more frequently than class II cavities without SPP in Group 3.SignificanceThe SPP and class I cavity with high C-factor triggered more AE events, confirming its negative impact on the bonding interface.     

Effect of oxalate desensitizer on the bonding durability of adhesive resin cements to dentin

PurposeThis study investigated whether the tubular occluding effect of oxalate desensitizer (OX) during adhesive cementation improved bonding of a self-etch and two etch-and-rinse resin cements to dentin after 6 months.MethodsA flat dentin surface was prepared on 120 extracted premolars, which were randomly divided into six groups of 20 teeth each according to the adhesive resin cement system used: ED primer II/Panavia F2.0, Excite DSC (Ex DSC)/Variolink II, and One-Step Plus (OS Plus)/Duolink, with or without OX (BisBlock) application. After cementation of an indirect composite rod, two subgroups (n = 10) were tested after 24 h and 6 months of water storage plus thermocycling, and shear bond strengths were recorded in MPa.ResultsStatistical tests showed that although oxalate had a borderline significant negative effect on initial bonding of ED primer II/Panavia F2.0, it significantly improved bonding durability (p < 0.05). OX severely compromised the initial bond strength of Ex DSC/Variolink II (p < 0.001) but had no effect on the reduction in bonding after aging. OX was compatible with OS Plus/Duolink and did not affect the loss of bonding strength after 6 months (p > 0.05).ConclusionCombining an oxalate desensitizer with three types of resin cements had different effects on bond strength to dentin after aging, depending on the interaction of oxalate with the adhesive system associated to the resin cement.     

Curing efficiency of four self-etching,self-adhesive resin cements

ObjectivesTo evaluate the degree of cure (%DC) of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin cements, and one conventional resin cement, in their self- and dual-curing mode.MethodsThe self-etching, self-adhesive resin cements studied were RelyX? Unicem (3M? ESPE? AG), Maxcem? (Kerr Corporation), Biscem? (Bisco, Inc.) and Multilink^® Sprint (Ivoclar Vivadent^® AG) and the classic resin cement was Multilink^® Automix (Ivoclar Vivadent^® AG). Twelve specimens of each material (1.8 mm × 4 mm × 4 mm) were prepared in room temperature (23 ± 1) °C following the manufacturers’ instructions. Six of them were treated as dual-cured, thus irradiated for 20 s with a halogen light curing unit and left undisturbed for 5 min. The other six were treated as self-cured and were not irradiated, but left in dark and dry conditions for 10 min. The assessment of the %DC was made using micro-ATR FTIR spectrometry.ResultsThe %DC in their self-curing mode was very low (10.82–24.93%), with Multilink Sprint exhibiting the highest values among the five. In the dual-curing mode the values obtained were also low (26.40–41.52%), with the exception of Multilink Automix (61.36%). Maxcem was found to have the lowest DC.SignificanceThe low %DC found raises questions as to whether these materials can be successfully used in clinical applications, where light attenuation takes place. Increased irradiation times could potentially lead to higher %DC, in applications where light is not completely blocked by the overlying restoration.     

Effect of water aging on microtensile bond strength of dual-cured resin cements to pre-treated sintered zirconium-oxide ceramics

ObjectivesTo evaluate the hydrolytic stability of different dual-cure resin cements when luted to zirconia ceramic.MethodsEighteen cylinder-shaped zirconia blocks (Cercon Zirconia, Dentsply) were conditioned with: Group 1, no treatment; Group 2, sandblasting (125 μm alumina–Al₂O₃-particles); Group 3, tribochemical silica coating (50 μm silica-modified Al₂O₃ particles). Ceramic blocks were duplicated in composite resin (Tetric Evo Ceram, Ivoclar-Vivadent). Composite disks were luted to pre-treated ceramic surfaces using: (1) Clearfil Esthetic Cement (CEC; Kuraray); (2) Rely X Unicem (RXU; 3M ESPE); (3) Calibra (CAL; Dentsply Caulk). After 24 h, bonded samples were cut into microtensile sticks (1 mm²). Half of the sticks were loaded in tension until failure (cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min). The remaining half was tested after 6 months of water storage at 37 °C. Data was analyzed with three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (P <0.05). Fractographic analysis was performed by SEM.ResultsAfter 24 h, bond strength of CEC to zirconia was significantly higher than that of RXU and CAL, independently from the ceramic pre-treatment (P <0.001). Using CAL, all samples failed prematurely except when luting to sandblasted surfaces. After 6 months of water aging, bond strength of CEC significantly decreased. RXU did not significantly alter bond strengths. Adhesion of sandblasted specimens luted with CAL fell over time. Micromorphological alterations were evident after water storage.SignificanceResin–ceramic interfacial longevity depended on cement selection rather than on surface pre-treatments. CEC and RXU were both suitable for luting zirconia. Water aging played an important role in the durability of zirconia-to-composite chemical bonds.     

Influence of surface treatments and resin cement selection on bonding to densely-sintered zirconium-oxide ceramic

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of surface conditioning on the microtensile bond strength of zirconium-oxide ceramic to dual-cured resin cements.MethodsEighteen cylinder-shaped zirconium-oxide ceramic blocks (Cercon^® Zirconia, Dentsply) were treated as follows: (1) Sandblasting with 125 μm aluminum-oxide (Al₂O₃) particles; (2) tribochemical silica coating using 50 μm Al₂O₃ particles modified by silica; (3) no treatment. Each ceramic cylinder was duplicated in composite resin (Tetric Evo Ceram, Ivoclar-Vivadent) using a silicon mold. Composite cylinders were bonded to conditioned ceramics using: (1) Calibra (Densply Caulk); (2) Clearfil Esthetic Cement (Kuraray); (3) Rely × Unicem (3 M ESPE). After 24 h bonded specimens were cut into microtensile sticks that were loaded in tension until failure. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls test for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05). Failure mode was recorded and the interfacial morphology of debonded specimens was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Surface topography and ceramic average surface roughness were analyzed under an atomic force microscope (AFM).ResultsSignificant changes in zirconia surface roughness occurred after sandblasting (p < 0.001). Bond strength of Clearfil cement to zirconia was significantly higher than that of Rely × Unicem and Calibra, regardless of the surface treatment (p < 0.001). When using Calibra, premature failures occurred in non-treated and silica coated zirconia surfaces.SignificanceThe phosphate monomer-containing luting system (Clearfil Esthetic Cement) is recommended to bond zirconia ceramics and surface treatments are not necessary.     

Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to different treated indirect composites

Objectives

The objective of this study was to determine microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin of three self-adhesive and a total-etch resin cements used for luting different treated indirect composites.

Materials and methods

Composite overlays (Filtek Z250) were prepared. Their intaglio surfaces were ground with 600-grit SiC papers and randomly assigned to three different surface treatments: no treatment, silane application (RelyX Ceramic Primer), and silane agent followed by a bonding agent (Adper Scotchbond 1 XT). The composite overlays were luted to flat dentin surfaces of extracted human third molars using the following self-adhesive resin cements: RelyX Unicem, Maxcem Elite and G-Cem, and a total-etch resin cement, RelyX ARC. The bonded assemblies were stored in water (24 h, 37 °C) and subsequently prepared for μTBS testing. Beams of approximately 1 mm² were tested in tension at 1 mm/min in a universal tester (Instron 3345). Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls tests (α?=?0.05).

Results

A significant influence of the resin cement used was detected. Composite surface treatment and the interaction between the resin cement applied and surface treatment did not affect μTBS.

Conclusions

Surface treatment of indirect resin composite did not improve the μTBS results of dentin/composite overlay complex. Self-adhesive resin cements tested obtained lower μTBS than the total-etch resin cement RelyX ARC. Specimens luted with Maxcem Elite exhibited the highest percentage of pretesting failures.

Clinical relevance

Surface treatment of indirect resin composite with silane or silane followed by a bonding agent did not affect bond strength to dentin.     

Comparison of four silane primers and an isocyanate primer for bonding of tri-n-butylborane resin to a leucite-reinforced glass ceramic

PurposeThe purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of an isocyanate monomer and four different silane monomers as primer components for bonding a leucite-reinforced glass ceramic (GN-Ceram Block).MethodsFour different methyl-methacrylate based primers, each with three different concentrations (1, 4, or 16wt%) of 2-methacryloxyethylisocyanate (MOI), 3-methacryloxypropylmethyldimethoxysilane (MDS), 3-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (MTS), and 3-acryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (ATS) were prepared. A commercially available silane primer (ESPE?Sil) was also used as a control. The GN-Ceram Block specimen was ground with silicon carbide paper, rinsed, primed, and then bonded to a resin composite disk using a tri-n-butylborane-initiated self-curing luting agent. After 24-h immersion in water, the shear bond strengths were determined.ResultsThe highest level of bond strength was obtained with 4wt% MTS (45.2 MPa) and 4wt% ATS (38.7 MPa), followed by 4wt% MOI (29.8 MPa), ESPE?Sil (28.1 MPa), and 4wt% MDS (27.9 MPa). For each MTS, ATS, MOI, and MDS, the bond strengths for concentrations of 4wt% and 16wt% were not significantly different. No significant differences were found between 4wt% ATS, 4wt% MOI, ESPE?Sil, and 4wt% MDS. The use of any of these primers led to a significant increase in bond strength compared to an unprimed control (13.8 MPa).ConclusionsThe type and concentration of monomers dissolved in the primer influence the bond strength between a tri-n-butylborane resin and a leucite-reinforced glass ceramic GN-Ceram Block. The effectiveness of MOI was found to be comparable to that of MDS, ATS, and ESPE?Sil, but inferior to that of MTS.     

Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of etch-and-rinse and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin

Purpose: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of indirect composite restorations to dentin using three commercial resin cements after 24 hours and 30 days of water storage. Materials and Methods: The medium dentin of third human molars was exposed (N = 30, n = 10 per group). Three commercial resin cements were used to cement indirect resin composite restorations to dentin: the auto‐cured C&B Cement/All Bond 2, the dual‐cured RelyX ARC/Adper Single Bond 2, and the self‐adhesive dual‐cured RelyX Unicem. Teeth were sectioned after water storage at 37°C (24 hours and 30 days) to obtain beams with a bonded area of 0.8 mm². The specimens were tested in a universal testing machine at a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. Scanning electron microscopic fractographic and interfacial micromorphology analyses were performed. Data were analyzed using two‐way ANOVA and Tukey′s test (α= 0.05). Results: Mean bond strength (MPa) after 24 hours: C&B Cement 19.5 ± 3.8, RelyX ARC 40.8 ± 9.4, RelyX Unicem 31.3 ± 7.4; after 30 days: C&B Cement 24.5 ± 5.1, RelyX ARC 44.2 ± 8.5, RelyX Unicem 28.3 ± 7.1. The mean bond strengths of both dual‐cure cements were significantly higher than that obtained with C&B Cement after 24 hours. A significant increase in the bond strength of C&B Cement was verified after 30 days, reaching values statistically equivalent to those produced by RelyX Unicem and RelyX ARC. The self‐adhesive cement preserved the same level of bond strength after 30 days. Fractographic analysis revealed a prevalence of cohesive fractures in the hybrid layer for C&B Cement, mixed (cohesive in the cement, hybrid layer, and adhesive) for RelyX ARC, and cohesive in the cement for RelyX Unicem. No distinguishable hybrid layer or resin tags were observed in the interaction of RelyX Unicem with dentin. Conclusions: The particular interaction of each cement with dentin results in specific bond strength and failure patterns that varied among groups in both evaluation times. Even though the self‐adhesive cement tested exhibited no authentic hybrid layer, it was able to promote reliable adhesion with the underlying dentin.     

Volumetric polymerization shrinkage and its comparison to internal adaptation in bulk fill and conventional composites: A μCT and OCT in vitro analysis

ObjectiveTo quantify the volumetric polymerization shrinkage (VPS) of different conventional and bulk fill resin composites, through micro-computed tomography (μCT), and qualitative comparison of gap formation through optical coherence tomography (OCT).MethodsBox-shaped class I cavities were prepared in 30 third-molars and divided into 5 groups (n = 6): G1- Filtek Z100 (Z100); G2- Tetric Evoceram Bulk Fill (TEC); G3- Tetric EvoFlow Bulk fill (TEF); G4- Filtek Bulk fill (FBU); and G5- Filtek Bulk fill Flowable (FBF). All groups were treated with Adper Single Bond Plus adhesive and light cured (Bluephase 20i). Each tooth was scanned three times using a μCT apparatus: after cavity preparation (empty scan); after cavity filling (uncured scan) and after light curing of the restorations (cured scan). The μCT images were imported into a three-dimensional rendering software, and volumetric polymerization shrinkage percentage was calculated (%) for each sample. In the same images, interfacial gaps in the pulpal floor were qualitatively evaluated. After μCT evaluation, the pulpal floor from each tooth was polished until a thin tooth structure was obtained and OCT images were obtained by scanning the pulpal portion. Gap formation was observed and qualitatively compared to the μCT images.ResultsVPS means ranged from 2.31 to 3.96% for the studied resin composites. The bulk fill materials, either high viscosity or flowable, were not statistically different from each other (p > 0.05). The conventional resin composite Z100 presented statistically higher VPS than both high viscosity bulk fill materials studied (p < 0.05), although it was statistically similar to the flowable bulk fill materials studied (p > 0.05). Both μCT and OCT methodologies enabled gap formation visualization, and images from both technologies could be associated. Gap formation was mostly observed for G1-Z100, G4-FBU, and G5-FBF. VPS% and pulpal gap formation could not be completely associated with each other for all groups and samples. Voids were observed in most of the resin composite fillings, and most VPS were observed in the occlusal area of the samples.SignificanceVolumetric polymerization shrinkage was material-dependent, although bulk fill materials did not differ from each other. Both μCT and OCT enabled interfacial pulpal gap formation visualization. VPS and gap formation cannot be completely associated with one another.     

粘接处理剂对自粘接树脂水门汀和RMGIC的牙本质粘接强度的影响

目的:实验评价牙本质粘接处理剂对自粘接树脂水门汀和树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)的牙本质微拉伸粘接强度的影响.方法:选用离体人无龋第三恒磨牙24颗,用低速切片机垂直于牙体长轴方向将磨牙冠(牙合)中1/3交界线处切开待用.实验组牙本质表面涂布牙本质粘接处理剂,对照组不涂粘接处理剂.后将试样分别用自粘接树脂水门汀(Unicem,3M ESPE;seT PP,SDI)或树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀(Fuji CEM,GC)原位对位粘接.水浴中储存24h后,用低速切片机把样本切割成约1mm×1mm×8mm条状,随后进行微拉伸测试.用扫描电镜观察粘接界面形貌.结果:无论是否使用粘接处理剂,Unicem的牙本质粘接强度显著高于seT PP 和Fuji CEM(P <0.01).与对照组相比,实验组的粘接强度显著提高(P <0.05).结论:粘接处理剂表面处理增强自粘接树脂水门汀及树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀的牙本质粘接强度.     

Challenges in luting fibre posts: Adhesion to the post and to the dentine

Objective

To investigate the relationship between physicochemical interactions of resin luting cements with dentine and retention of fibre posts in root canals.

Influence of bonding surface and bonding methods on the fracture resistance and survival rate of full-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic after cyclic loading

ObjectivesThe purpose of this laboratory study was to evaluate the influence of bonding method and type of dental bonding surface on fracture resistance and survival rate of resin bonded occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic after cyclic loading.MethodsFourty-eight extracted molars were divided into three groups (N = 16) depending on the preparation: within enamel, within dentin/enamel or within enamel/composite resin filling. Lithium disilicate occlussal veneers were fabricated with a fissure-cusp thickness of 0.3–0.6 mm. Restorations were etched (5% HF), silanated and adhesively luted using a dual-curing luting composite resin. Test groups were divided into two subgroups, one using a only a self-etching primer, the other additionally etching the enamel with phosphoric acid. After water storage (37 °C; 21 d) and thermocycling (7500 cycles; 5–55 °C), specimens were subjected to dynamic loading in a chewing simulator (600,000 cycles; 10 kg/2 Hz). Surviving specimens were loaded until fracture using a universal testing machine.ResultsAll specimens survived artificial aging, several specimens showed some damage. ANOVA revealed that enamel etching provided statistically significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher fracture resistance than self-etching when bonding to enamel and dentin. Self-etching provided statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) higher fracture resistance for the enamel-composite group than for the enamel group. Enamel etching provided statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) higher fracture resistance for the enamel and dentin group than for groups enamel and enamel-composite.SignificanceEtching enamel improved the fracture resistance of occlusal veneers when bonding to dentin and enamel and increased the survival rate when bonding to enamel.     

Adhesion procedures for CAD/CAM indirect resin composite block: A new resin primer versus a conventional silanizing agent

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of both a resin primer containing methyl methacrylate (MMA) and a silanizing agent on bonding to indirect resin composite blocks, using two types of build-up hybrid resin composites.MethodsSHOFU BLOCK HC (Shofu) specimens were blasted with alumina, after which one of two surface treatments was applied: CERA RESIN BOND (Shofu, the Silane group) or HC primer (Shofu, the MMA group). Resin composites made using either Solidex Hardura (SDH, Shofu) or Ceramage Duo (CMD, Shofu) were built up and micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) values were measured after storage in water for either 24 h or 6 months (n = 24 per group). The fracture surfaces after μTBS measurements and the resin block/build-up resin interfaces were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).ResultsThe bond strength of the Silane/SDH group significantly decreased after 6 months (p < 0.001), whereas in the MMA group there was no significant loss after 24 h or 6 months (p = 0.99). In the CMD group, the bond strength after 6 months was significantly lowered in both the Silane group (p < 0.001) and the MMA group (p < 0.001), but the latter still showed greater adhesion. SEM images demonstrated that the matrix resin was partially destroyed at the fracture surfaces of the MMA group and fracture surface unevenness was observed.ConclusionsA primer containing MMA produced stronger bonding to CAD/CAM resin even after long-term aging compared to a silane treatment.