Factors Influencing Quality of Life after Surgical and Nonsurgical Interventions of Persistent Endodontic Disease

IntroductionNonsurgical endodontic retreatment and apical surgery are predictable procedures for the management of endodontically treated teeth with persistent disease. However, there is no information available that compares these treatment modalities based on patients’ oral health–related quality of life (OHRQOL). The aims of this study were to compare the OHRQOL of patients who received nonsurgical endodontic retreatment versus those who received apical surgery and to identify correlations between OHRQOL, clinician-assessed healing outcome, and other factors.MethodsPatients who received treatment at 2 dental hospitals with a recall period of 6–24 months were invited to participate. They underwent follow-up examination and were surveyed with the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Healing outcomes were determined by clinical and radiographic evaluation. Potential influencing factors for OHIP-14 scores were investigated.ResultsOne hundred fifty patients (75 patients from each group) participated in the study. There were no differences in OHIP-14 scores between both groups at the follow-up. The overall adverse impact on OHRQOL was low, with patients experiencing greater impact in the domains of “physical pain” and “psychological discomfort.” Women and patients who had preoperative pain reported a greater impact. There was an overall high healed and healing rate for both groups. No correlation was found between OHIP-14 scores and healing outcome.ConclusionsPatients who received nonsurgical endodontic retreatment and apical surgery reported comparable OHRQOL, with women and patients with preoperative pain reporting greater impact. Both treatments are viable options for the management of persistent endodontic disease based on clinician- and patient-reported outcome assessments.     

Prevalence of persistent pain after endodontic treatment and factors affecting its occurrence in cases with complete radiographic healing

AIMS: To (i) determine the prevalence of persistent dento-alveolar pain following nonsurgical and/or surgical endodontic treatment conducted in a teaching dental hospital and (ii) identify the risk factors associated with persistent pain after apparently successful root canal treatment. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 175 patients/teeth were reviewed 12-59 months following treatment. The patients were examined clinically and radiographically and a detailed pain history obtained. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between potential risk factors and persistent pain after successful endodontic treatment. RESULTS: The prevalence of persistent pain after successful root canal treatment was 12% (21/175). Treatment success was determined by the absence of clinical and radiographic signs of dental disease. The factors that were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with persistent pain following endodontic treatment were: 'duration of preoperative pain' [odds ratio (OR) = 8.6], 'preoperative pain from the tooth' (OR = 7.8), 'preoperative tenderness to percussion' (OR = 7.8), 'previous chronic pain problems' (OR = 4.5), 'gender' (OR = 4.5) and 'history of painful treatment in the orofacial region' (OR = 3.8). 'Type of treatment received (surgical or nonsurgical treatment)' showed borderline significance at the 10% level. CONCLUSIONS: The presence and duration of preoperative pain from the tooth site, lasting at least 3 months, a positive history of previous chronic pain experience or painful treatment in the orofacial region, and female gender were important risk factors associated with persistent pain after successful endodontic treatment.     

Incidence of Altered Sensation after Mandibular Premolar and Molar Periapical Surgery

IntroductionAltered sensation is a rare but disturbing adverse event after mandibular premolar and molar periapical surgery procedures, and its incidence is not known. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of altered sensation after periapical surgery procedures in mandibular premolars and molars.MethodsThis retrospective study includes patients who received periapical surgery in endodontic clinics of a university hospital in the United States. Data were obtained by review of the records for patients who met the inclusion criteria, and statistical analysis of possible predictive factors was performed using the 2-tailed Fisher exact test (α = 0.05).ResultsSixty-two patients (63 teeth, 13 premolars and 50 molars) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were analyzed in the study. The first follow-up visit occurred 3 to 37 days after surgery. Altered sensation was observed in 9 patients. Observation of altered sensation was significantly higher (odds ratio = 7.19) after premolar surgeries (5/13) compared with molar surgeries (4/50).ConclusionsDespite the limited size and retrospective nature of this study, it was concluded that the incidence of altered sensation after periapical surgery appears to be relatively high (14%), with a higher incidence found in premolars compared with molars.     

Severe Pain after Endodontic Surgery: An Analysis of Incidence and Risk Factors

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of postoperative pain after endodontic microsurgery and to identify potential predictors for severe pain.MethodsOne hundred seventy-three patients who underwent endodontic microsurgery at a private practice were included in the study. The patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire to assess their postoperative pain levels for 5 days after surgery. The questionnaires were analyzed to record the changes in pain levels over time. The presence and size of preoperative lesions and bone thickness were determined on preoperative cone-beam computed tomographic scans. Statistical analyses were performed to identify predictors for developing severe pain after surgery. A binary logistic regression model was established to predict the occurrence of severe pain.ResultsSevere pain was most prevalent on day 1 (17.3%) and gradually decreased until a small increase on day 5. The average pain level also peaked on day 1 postoperatively and gradually decreased afterward. No significant difference was observed between patients who reported severe pain and those who did not report severe pain regarding tooth position (anterior vs posterior), lesion size, and presence of fenestration. However, sex, age, and bone thickness were all significant predictors of severe postoperative pain, with odds ratios of 2.8, 0.96, and 1.41, respectively.ConclusionsSevere pain was reported only in a small number of patients after endodontic microsurgery. Younger patients, females, and patients with thicker bone covering the apex are significantly more likely to develop severe pain.     

Postoperative pain after the removal of root canal filling material using different techniques in teeth with failed root canal therapy: a randomized clinical trial

Objectives: This study evaluated the intensity and duration of postoperative pain after the removal of root canal filling material in retreatment procedures of upper incisor teeth with chronic apical periodontitis, using different techniques.

Materials and methods: One hundred and thirty-five patients requiring retreatment of upper incisor teeth with chronic apical periodontitis were included in the study. The patients were assigned to three groups of 45 patients, according to the method used to remove old canal filling material. In group 1, canal filling material was removed using hand files. In group 2, the canal filling material was removed with ProTaper universal retreatment (PTUR) instruments. In group 3, Reciproc instruments were used to remove canal filling material. Teeth were then medicated with calcium hydroxide and sealed using temporary filling material. The presence of postoperative pain was assessed after 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72?h, 7 days, and finally after 10 days.

Results: In all time intervals, except for 72?h, 7 days and 10 days, group 1 participants reported more intense postoperative pain than those in groups 2 and 3 (p?=?0.02). In all time intervals, there was no difference in the pain scores between groups 2 and 3 (p?=?0.08). In all groups, the intensity of postoperative pain decreased over time. The required time to remove canal filling material was less for the Reciproc group compared to the hand and ProTaper retreatment groups (p?=?0.032).

Conclusions: Hand files caused greater postoperative pain after non-surgical endodontic retreatment (NSER) of upper incisor teeth with chronic apical periodontitis compared to the ProTaper retreatment and Reciproc files.     

Contribution of Endodontic Pathology to Persistent Orofacial Pain: A Case Report

Identifying the etiology and correct diagnoses for long-standing orofacial pain can be very challenging, especially in patients who have both odontogenic and nonodontogenic pain. This case report describes the successful management of a complex case of chronic orofacial pain in a patient with nonodontogenic chronic pain conditions and a maxillary molar tooth with persistent periapical pathology after endodontic treatment. The debilitating orofacial pain began after initial nonsurgical root canal treatment of the maxillary molar 3 years before presenting to our clinic. The initial clinical and radiographic assessment by our multidisciplinary team found that there were potentially both peripheral endodontic pathology and central pain mechanisms contributing to the long-standing pain. The diagnosis was shared with the patient's neurologist, who prescribed gabapentin, a centrally acting analgesic, and partial pain reduction was achieved. The odontogenic component of the orofacial pain was then addressed, by treating the persistent periapical infection and buccal bone fenestration of the roots of the maxillary molar. Treatments included both nonsurgical retreatment and surgical endodontic therapy (including root resection, root-end preparation, and retrofilling), and each significantly improved the patient's ongoing orofacial pain. After the successful endodontic treatments, the patient reported minimal pain and normal oral function. The case report highlights the importance of systematically treating endodontic pathology in a patient with long-standing orofacial pain, with both odontogenic and nonodontogenic components.     

3-year Outcome of Patients with Persistent Pain after Root Canal Treatment: The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

IntroductionWe measured the long-term outcomes of patients reporting persistent pain 6 months after root canal treatment (RCT) and assessed the characteristics differing patients with pain chronification from those with pain resolution.MethodsForty-five patients previously found to have persistent pain 6 months post-RCT from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network were approached for a 3-year follow-up, and 27 participated in the survey. The frequency of self-reported pain, its impact on the ability to perform daily activities, and health care use were measured. The differences between patients whose persistent pain continued and those whose pain resolved were assessed.ResultsFive patients met criteria for pain at 3.4 years (range, 3.1–3.9 years) post-RCT, which was moderate in intensity, occurred for about 3 days in the preceding month, and kept 1 patient from usual activities. Additional health care was received by 4 of 5 patients whose pain continued compared with 7 of 22 patients whose pain resolved. A longer duration of preoperative pain and higher pain intensity and interference at 6 months were found among patients with pain chronification. Of 13 patients with specific diagnoses for the persistent pain derived at 65 ± 41 days (∼8 months) post-RCT, 10 improved regardless of the diagnosis or treatment, and 11 had a temporomandibular disorder and/or headache as comorbid diagnoses (6) or causes (6) of the persistent “tooth” pain.ConclusionsProgression of persistent post-RCT pain occurred in 19% of patients. The majority (56%) of patients improved without additional interventions. Both the group that improved and the group that continued to experience pain had a mixture of odontogenic and nonodontogenic etiologies.     

Quantitative Assessment of Mechanical Allodynia and Central Sensitization in Endodontic Patients

IntroductionPatients seeking endodontic treatment commonly present with reduced mechanical pain thresholds (ie, mechanical allodynia [MA]) in the offending teeth. In patients with moderate to severe pain, MA may manifest in the teeth contralateral to the offending teeth because of the onset of central sensitization (CS). We hypothesize that there are quantitative differences in MA and CS in patients with different pulp and periradicular diagnoses.MethodsPatients (n = 70) receiving endodontic treatment in the graduate endodontic clinic at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio and healthy volunteers (n = 10) were included in this cross-sectional study. The mechanical pain threshold from molar teeth was measured by a digital bite force transducer on the offending tooth (ipsilateral) and the contralateral tooth. Ipsi- and contralateral MA among different endodontic diagnoses were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn post hoc test and the Student t test for differences between sexes. Multivariate regression models analyzed predictors for MA and CS.ResultsPeriradicular diagnoses of asymptomatic apical periodontitis, symptomatic apical periodontitis, and chronic apical abscess cases were significantly associated with MA. CS, seen as contralateral MA, was only detected in pulpal diagnosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, previously initiated treatment, symptomatic apical periodontitis, and chronic apical abscess. Females experienced significantly lower pain thresholds than males on both sides. MA and CS were significantly correlated in both sexes. The preoperative pain level and duration were significant predictors for MA and CS only in female patients. Lastly, age was a significant predictor for MA in females.ConclusionsThe magnitude of MA and CS varied with different endodontic diagnoses, with CS being correlated with increases in MA. Only in female patients were age, preoperative pain duration, and intensity significant predictors for the development of MA and CS.     

Long-term Outcomes of Full Pulpotomy in Permanent Molars for Patients Treated in a Single,Short Session under Special Conditions

IntroductionEndodontic procedures for patients requiring treatment in a single, short session need to be validated. This study aimed at evaluating the long-term outcome of full pulpotomy in permanent molars performed with reinforced zinc oxide–eugenol cement (Intermediate Restorative Material [IRM], Dentsply Sirona, Versailles, France) immediately restored using stainless steel crowns under general anesthesia.MethodsThe absence of clinical signs and symptoms and the evolution of the periapical index between the treatment date and the longest follow-up time were used to grade the pulpotomy outcome as “effective,” “uncertain,” or “ineffective.” The impact of different criteria on the pulpotomy outcome was tested (ie, the etiology of the lesion, tooth maturity, endodontic difficulty related to the coronal shape and the root canal shape, and endodontic difficulty related to the radiographic root canal appearance).ResultsAmong the 608 teeth (338 patients) treated in a single session with IRM full pulpotomy and stainless steel preformed crowns, 263 (143 patients) were evaluated after a median follow-up period of 24 months. Overall, 89% of the pulpotomies were effective, 7.6% were of uncertain outcome, and 3.4% were ineffective. No tested criteria influenced the rate of effectiveness.ConclusionsLong-term outcomes of IRM pulpotomy are similar to those of calcium silicate–based cement pulpotomy observed in the literature. This procedure should not be restricted to patients treated under general anesthesia because it is relevant for all special conditions that impose the provision of endodontic treatment in a single, short session, such as dental care emergencies during humanitarian crises or pandemic periods.     

Failure of Regenerative Endodontic Procedures: Case Analysis and Subsequent Treatment Options

IntroductionRegenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) are considered effective treatments for immature necrotic permanent teeth, with favorable outcomes. However, failed cases require subsequent treatment. This study aimed to review and analyze failed cases after REPs and suggest a treatment algorithm to aid clinical decision-making.MethodsA total of 111 REP cases were selected that were conducted between 2015 and 2020. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on clinical and radiographic evaluations. The criteria for failure included persistence of clinical signs or symptoms and/or periapical radiolucency showing persistent apical periodontitis. Cases requiring any treatment intervention, including extraction, were also considered failures.ResultsSixteen cases were included as failures. The etiology of pulpal disease was stratified into dental trauma (56%), dens evaginatus (25%), and dental caries (12.5%), with the remaining one case having an undocumented cause. The primary reasons for treatment failure were persistent infection (81.3%) and root resorption (18.7%). The identification time of failure varied, with 6 cases (37.5%) detected in less than 6 months and 10 cases (62.5%) later than 6 months after REPs. Sixteen failed cases received 5 different interventions: second REPs, apexification, conventional root canal treatment, surgical approach, and extraction.ConclusionsInterventions for failed REPs are challenging. Consideration of the treatability of the tooth, accessibility to the canal, and the presence of an apical seat might be key factors in clinical decision-making to obtain a successful outcome.     

The impact of cardiovascular disease and endodontic outcome: a systematic review of longitudinal studies

Objectives

To date, the relationship between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and endodontic treatment outcomes remains elusive with mixed reports. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review of longitudinal cohort studies was to evaluate whether CVD was a risk factor for endodontic outcome.

Materials and methods

Two reviewers independently conducted a comprehensive electronic database search to July 2020. The bibliographies of all relevant articles, textbooks, and gray literature were manually searched. The methodological quality of evidence was appraised by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and GRADE. The authors considered any publication on CVD and endodontic outcome. Endodontic outcome referred to either healing or survival of endodontically treated tooth. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used.

Results

Three articles met the inclusion criteria with a low risk of bias. Patients with CVD demonstrated a 67% higher risk for negative endodontic outcomes compared with patients who were healthy (RR = 1.67, P = 0.001, 95% confidence interval 1.53–1.81).

Conclusion

With the limitations of this systematic review, the overall confidence by GRADE was moderate suggesting that CVD might be a risk factor for endodontic outcomes.

Clinical relevance

The results support an association between CVD and endodontic outcomes.

     

Characteristics of Endodontic Emergencies during Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak in Wuhan

IntroductionIn late 2019, an outbreak of a new coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was detected in Wuhan, China. A great percentage of patients with this disease developed symptoms of dry cough, malaise, and a high fever. During this time, several patients requiring assessment and treatment of endodontic emergencies were directed to the School and Hospital of Stomatology at Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. We examined the characteristics of these patients.MethodsA total of 96 patients with a mean age of 42.24 ± 18.32 years visited the general and emergency department of the School and Hospital of Stomatology at Wuhan University because of endodontic emergencies during the peak period of February 22 to March 2, 2020. Patient information was collected and organized by date of visit, sex, age, and systemic disease history. Body temperature was measured and acquired for each patient, a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemiologic investigation questionnaire was given to each patient, an endodontic diagnosis was determined for the offending tooth, and a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) was used to record pain levels.ResultsOf the total patient visits during this period, 50.26% of visits were for endodontic treatment. No patients had a fever (>37.2°C). One patient with a confirmed COVID-19 history was admitted after recovery. Three admitted patients had been exposed to confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients. Twelve admitted patients (12.5%) with a mean age of 62.42 ± 13.77 years had a history of systemic diseases. The most common age group for endodontic emergencies was 45–64 years (30.21%), and patients of this group showed a significantly higher mean VNRS score compared with that of the 6- to 19-year age group and the 20- to 34-year age group (P < .05). The majority of endodontic emergency diagnoses were diseases of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (53.10%). Patients who were diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, symptomatic apical periodontitis, and acute apical abscess showed a significantly higher mean VNRS score than that of other groups (P < .05).ConclusionsEndodontic emergencies, with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis being the most common, consist of a much higher proportion of dental emergencies in a COVID-19 high-risk area than normally. Vital pulp therapy can advantageously reduce treatment time, resulting in a reduced risk of infection for vital pulp cases. Rubber dams, personal protective equipment, and patient screening are of great importance during the COVID-19 outbreak in protecting clinicians.     

Efficacy and Safety of Postoperative Medications in Reducing Pain after Nonsurgical Endodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of postoperative medications in decreasing pain after nonsurgical endodontic treatment using a network meta-analytic approach.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched (until July 31, 2019). Two reviewers selected eligible randomized controlled trials and extracted and meta-analyzed data to estimate the treatment effects of pain assessed on a 0–100 scale (mean difference [MD]); 95% credible interval [CrI], and surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA]) at 6–8, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively after the administration of various interventions. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was applied to eligible trials. The overall quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach obtained from the CINeMA Web application (University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland).ResultsEight interventions among 11 studies were identified: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), NSAIDs + acetaminophen, NSAIDs + benzodiazepines, NSAIDs + opioids, corticosteroids, opioids, acetaminophen, and placebo. Compared with placebo, nonsurgical endodontic treatment pain 6–8 hours postoperatively improved with NSAIDs + acetaminophen (MD = −22; 95% CrI, −38 to −7.2; SUCRA = 73%; moderate confidence) and NSAIDs (MD = −21; 95% CrI, −34 to −7.6; SUCRA = 68%; very low confidence). At 12 and 24 hours, only NSAIDs were effective in decreasing postoperative pain. At 48 hours, no treatment resulted in significant pain reduction. Corticosteroids and opioids did not significantly decrease pain. No major safety concerns were reported.ConclusionsVery low- to moderate-quality evidence suggests that NSAIDs or NSAIDs + acetaminophen administered after nonsurgical endodontic treatment lead to a clinically relevant decrease in postoperative pain for patients with irreversible pulpitis or pulpal necrosis and are the most effective treatments available. Postoperative corticosteroids or opioids did not significantly decrease postoperative pain.     

Preoperative Intraligamentary Injection of Dexamethasone Can Improve the Anesthetic Success Rate of 2% Lidocaine during the Endodontic Management of Mandibular Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

IntroductionThe aim of this randomized, double-blind clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of preoperative administration of intraligamentary injections of diclofenac sodium and dexamethasone on the anesthetic efficacy of 2% lidocaine given as an inferior alveolar nerve block in the endodontic management of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.MethodsOne hundred seventeen patients randomly received 1 of the 3 intraligamentary injections before the endodontic treatment: 0.9% normal saline, 25 mg/mL diclofenac sodium, or 4 mg/mL dexamethasone. After 30 minutes, patients received an inferior alveolar nerve block with 2% lidocaine and 1:80,000 epinephrine. The teeth were tested with electric pulp testing after 10 minutes. In case of a positive response, the anesthesia was considered as “failed.” If the electric test response was negative, a rubber dam was applied, and endodontic treatment was started. Any pain during the treatment was recorded. The anesthesia was considered successful if the patients experienced no pain or faint/weak/mild pain during root canal access preparation and instrumentation (Heft-Parker visual analog scale score <55 mm). The effect of intraligamentary injections on maximum heart rates was also recorded. The anesthetic success rates were analyzed with the Pearson chi-square test at 5% significance.ResultsThe control, diclofenac sodium, and dexamethasone groups had anesthetic success rates of 32%, 37%, and 73%, respectively. Dexamethasone was significantly more successful than the control and diclofenac sodium groups (P < .001, χ²₂ = 14.7). There were no differences between the control and diclofenac groups (P > .05). All the solutions did not significantly affect heart rates.ConclusionsThe administration of an intraligamentary injection of dexamethasone before endodontic intervention of mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis increases the success rates of an inferior alveolar nerve block with 2% lidocaine.     

Clinical Effect Evaluation of Concentrated Growth Factor in Endodontic Microsurgery: A Cross-Sectional Study

IntroductionConcentrated growth factor (CGF) is the third-generation platelet concentrate product. This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of CGF during endodontic microsurgery had a positive influence on surgical outcomes.MethodsFifty-four patients who underwent endodontic microsurgery from January 2017 to November 2021 were enrolled. They were assigned to the CGF and the control groups according to whether CGF was used during the surgery and followed up at 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery. Preoperative classification of the cases and follow-up radiographic outcomes were based on Kim’s classification and Molven’s criteria, respectively, and evaluated by 2 calibrated endodontists. The Student t test and χ² test were used to assess the baseline of 2 groups. Rank sum test was used to determine whether CGF had an impact on the surgical outcome.ResultsThirty-one patients (41 periapical lesion sites) were included in the CGF group, and 23 patients (26 periapical lesion sites) were included in the control group. The overall success rate of endodontic microsurgery was greater than 90%. The baseline of the 2 groups had no difference (P < .05). In the CGF group, the success rate was always 100% in 3 follow-ups, whereas the success rate was 84.2%, 92.8%, and 90%, respectively, in the control group. The success rate between the CGF group and the control group was statistically significant in all 3 follow-up points (P < .05).ConclusionsThe application of CGF during endodontic microsurgery might have a positive influence on surgical outcomes, thus, its prognosis. However, higher-grade evidence is needed to demonstrate its role.