Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium dowel and cores cemented with three luting agents

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the tensile strength of commercially pure titanium dowels and cores cemented with zinc phosphate or resin cements.MethodsTwenty-one extracted human canines were endodontically treated. The root preparations were accomplished using Largo reamers (10 mm in depth and 1.7 mm in diameter). Acrylic resin patterns for the dowel and cores were made, and specimens were cast in commercially pure titanium (n = 7) and divided in three groups: TZ–CP Ti dowels luted with zinc phosphate luting agent, TP–CP Ti dowels luted with Panavia F and TR–CP Ti dowels luted with RelyX U100. Tensile strengths were measured in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The results (N) were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey tests (α = 0.01).ResultsThe ANOVA indicated that there were significant differences among the groups tested. A Tukey multiple comparison procedure was performed and revealed statistically significant higher retention values for the dowel luted with RelyX U100 when compared with zinc phosphate or Panavia F.ConclusionCast commercially pure titanium dowels and cores fixed with RelyX U100 cement presented superior bond strength retention when compared to zinc phosphate and Panavia F.     

Effect of types of luting agent on push-out bond strength of zirconium oxide posts

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different luting agents on the bond strength of zirconium oxide posts in root canals after artificial ageing.Material and methodsThirty single-rooted extracted teeth were collected. Post spaces were prepared. Custom milled zirconium oxide posts (Cercon, Degudent) were fabricated. Specimens were divided into 3 groups (n = 10), according to the luting agents used: group RA, conventional resin luting agent (RelyX ARC); group RU, self-adhesive resin luting agent (RelyX Unicem); and group Z, zinc phosphate luting agent (DeTrey). Specimens were subjected to thermocycling and water storage at 37 °C. Specimens were horizontally sectioned into three sections and subjected to a push-out test with 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. The failure mode was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analysed by using 2-way ANOVA.ResultsThe following bond strength values were obtained: group RA – 8.89 MPa, group RU – 10.30 MPa and group Z – 9.31 MPa. There was no significant difference in bond strength among the groups (P = 0.500). Adhesive failure mode at the cement/post bonded interface was seen in 100%, 66.67% and 83.3% of examined sections in groups RA, RU and Z, respectively. There was no significant difference in bond strength among different root regions (P = 0.367).ConclusionThe type of luting agent had no significant effect on the push-out bond strength of zirconium oxide posts after artificial ageing.Clinical significanceConventional luting agents, such as zinc phosphate cement, seem to provide comparable retention to resin luting agents for cementing custom milled zirconium oxide posts.     

Misfit and microleakage of implant-supported crown copings obtained by laser sintering and casting techniques,luted with glass-ionomer,resin cements and acrylic/urethane-based agents

ObjectivesThis study evaluated the marginal misfit and microleakage of cement-retained implant-supported crown copings.MethodsSingle crown structures were constructed with: (1) laser-sintered Co–Cr (LS); (2) vacuum-cast Co–Cr (CC) and (3) vacuum-cast Ni–Cr–Ti (CN). Samples of each alloy group were randomly luted in standard fashion onto machined titanium abutments using: (1) GC Fuji PLUS (FP); (2) Clearfil Esthetic Cement (CEC); (3) RelyX Unicem 2 Automix (RXU) and (4) DentoTemp (DT) (n = 15 each). After 60 days of water ageing, vertical discrepancy was SEM-measured and cement microleakage was scored using a digital microscope. Misfit data were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls multiple comparisons tests. Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn's tests were run for microleakage analysis (α = 0.05).ResultsRegardless of the cement type, LS samples exhibited the best fit, whilst CC and CN performed equally well. Despite the framework alloy and manufacturing technique, FP and DT provide comparably better fit and greater microleakage scores than did CEC and RXU, which showed no differences.ConclusionsDMLS of Co–Cr may be a reliable alternative to the casting of base metal alloys to obtain well-fitted implant-supported crowns, although all the groups tested were within the clinically acceptable range of vertical discrepancy. No strong correlations were found between misfit and microleakage. Notwithstanding the framework alloy, definitive resin-modified glass-ionomer (FP) and temporary acrylic/urethane-based (DT) cements demonstrated comparably better marginal fit and greater microleakage scores than did 10-methacryloxydecyl-dihydrogen phosphate-based (CEC) and self-adhesive (RXU) dual-cure resin agents.     

Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays

Objectives

The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the 4-year clinical performance of a self-adhesive resin cement, RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE), used for cementation of ceramic inlays. In addition, the influence of selectively acid-etching enamel prior to luting on the clinical performance of the restorations was assessed.

Methods

Sixty-two IPS Empress 2 inlays/onlays were placed in 31 patients by two experienced clinicians. The restorations were luted with RelyX Unicem with (=experimental group: E) or without (=control group: NE) prior enamel etching with phosphoric acid. At baseline, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 4 years after placement, the restorations were assessed by two calibrated investigators using modified USPHS criteria. Ten selected samples of each group were investigated under SEM regarding morphological changes at the cement–inlay interface.

Results

The recall rate at 4 years was 97 %. Two restorations (1 E, 1 NE) were lost, and one (E) had to be replaced due to inlay and tooth fracture resulting in a survival rate of 95 %. No significant differences between the experimental and control group were noticed regarding all criteria (McNemar, p?<?0.05). An obvious deterioration in marginal integrity was observed after 4 years as only 5 % (E?=?7 %; NE?=?3 %) of the restorations exhibited an excellent marginal adaptation. In 90 % of the restorations small, still clinically acceptable marginal deficiencies were observed. SEM of the luting gap showed an increased wear of the RelyX Unicem cement over the 4-year period.

Conclusions

The self-adhesive luting cement RelyX Unicem can be recommended for bonding of ceramic inlays/onlays. Additional selective enamel etching does not improve the clinical performance of the restorations within the 4-year period.

Clinical relevance

The self-adhesive resin composite RelyX Unicem showed acceptable clinical performance after 4 years of clinical service.     

1-Year clinical study of indirect resin composite restorations luted with a self-adhesive resin cement: effect of enamel etching

In vitro studies have recommended enamel-etching before luting indirect restorations with self-adhesive resin cement. However, there is no scientific proof that this procedure has any clinical relevance. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of enamel-etching on the marginal quality of indirect composite resin restorations (inlay/onlay) using the self-adhesive cement RelyX Unicem clicker. Forty-two posterior teeth were selected from 25 patients that presented one or two teeth with large restorations in need of replacement. All teeth were prepared by the same operator and impressed with polyvinylsiloxane material. The composite resin restorations were built over plaster casts using the incremental technique with a LED device for light-curing the increments. The inlays/onlays were cemented according to one of the following protocols: 1. Etched group (ETR) - selective enamel phosphoric-acid etching + RelyX Unicem clicker; 2. Non-etched group (NER) - RelyX Unicem clicker alone. Each surface was light-cured for 60 s. Recalls occurred after 1 week (baseline), 6 and 12 months when the teeth were evaluated according to previously established scores (modified USPHS criteria). The clinical analysis showed little or no visible changes in the marginal quality after 1 year, even though a probe could detect all the restorations margins. Statistical analysis (Fisher's exact test, p<0.05) detected no differences between the groups after 12 months. No restorations failed and no secondary caries were found. Enamel acid etching had no clinical relevance on the marginal quality of indirect composite resin restorations luted with RelyX Unicem clicker after 1 year of follow up.     

Mechanical properties of new self-adhesive resin-based cement

PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare the bonding strength, flexural strength, elastic modulus, water absorption and the expansion after water storage of new self-adhesive resin cements to commercially available dental cements.MethodsTwo types (hand-mix and auto-mix) of new self-adhesive resin cements (SAC-H and SAC-A, Kuraray Medical), one conventional resin cement (Panavia F2.0), three self-adhesive resin cements (Relyx Unicem, Maxcem and G-Cem), and two resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Fuji Luting S and Vitremer) were used. Shear bond strengths, flexural strengths and elastic moduli (ISO 4049), water absorption (ISO 4049), and the expansion rate after water storage were investigated.ResultsBoth SAC-H and SAC-A provided adhesion to enamel and dentin, and had the same bond strength to gold alloy and zirconia as conventional resin cements. SAC-H and SAC-A had greater flexural strengths (86.4–93.5 MPa) than commercial self-adhesive resin cements or glass-ionomer cements. The elastic moduli of self-adhesive and glass-ionomer cements were 5.2–7.4 GPa and 2.3–3.4 GPa, respectively. The water absorption of SAC-H and SAC-A (26.3–27.7 μg/mm³) were significantly lower than commercial self-adhesive resin cements. SAC-H and SAC-A showed significantly lower expansion rates (0.17–0.26%) than commercial self-adhesive cements and glass-ionomer cements after 4 weeks water storage.ConclusionsIt is suggested that the new self-adhesive resin cements exhibited a favorable bonding capability and mechanical properties.     

Effect of pulpal pressure on the microtensile bond strength of luting resin cements to human dentin

ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to examine the effect of pulpal pressure on the microtensile bond strength (mTBS) of luting resin cements to human dentin and the permeability of dentin surfaces pre-treated with an adhesive and a self-etching primer.MethodsCylindrical composite blocks were luted with resin cements (RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE: ARC; Panavia F, Kuraray Medical Inc.: PF; RelyX Unicem, 3M ESPE: UN) in the absence or presence of simulated pulpal pressure. The application of Adper Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE) and ED primer 2.0 (Kuraray) was performed under 0 cm H₂O. After each resin cement was applied, the pulpal pressure group was subjected to 20 cm H₂O of hydrostatic pressure for 10 min during the initial setting period. Testing for mTBS was performed on 0.9 mm × 0.9 mm sectioned beams after 24 h water-storage. Scanning electron microscopy was performed to investigate the fractured surfaces after mTBS testing and additional dentin surfaces that were treated by an etchant, ED primer 2.0 and UN. Fluid permeability was measured on dentin surfaces that were applied with Adper Single Bond 2 and ED primer 2.0.ResultsApplication of pulpal pressure reduced mTBS significantly in groups ARC and PF. Porous bonding interfaces due to water permeability through the cured adhesive were observed on fractured surfaces. Dentin surfaces that were applied with the adhesive and the primer were more permeable than smear layer-covered dentin. The mTBS of UN was significantly lower than ARC and PF regardless of the absence/presence of pulpal pressure.SignificanceFluid permeation during the initial setting period deteriorated the bonding quality of resin cements.     

Curing efficiency of four self-etching,self-adhesive resin cements

ObjectivesTo evaluate the degree of cure (%DC) of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin cements, and one conventional resin cement, in their self- and dual-curing mode.MethodsThe self-etching, self-adhesive resin cements studied were RelyX? Unicem (3M? ESPE? AG), Maxcem? (Kerr Corporation), Biscem? (Bisco, Inc.) and Multilink^® Sprint (Ivoclar Vivadent^® AG) and the classic resin cement was Multilink^® Automix (Ivoclar Vivadent^® AG). Twelve specimens of each material (1.8 mm × 4 mm × 4 mm) were prepared in room temperature (23 ± 1) °C following the manufacturers’ instructions. Six of them were treated as dual-cured, thus irradiated for 20 s with a halogen light curing unit and left undisturbed for 5 min. The other six were treated as self-cured and were not irradiated, but left in dark and dry conditions for 10 min. The assessment of the %DC was made using micro-ATR FTIR spectrometry.ResultsThe %DC in their self-curing mode was very low (10.82–24.93%), with Multilink Sprint exhibiting the highest values among the five. In the dual-curing mode the values obtained were also low (26.40–41.52%), with the exception of Multilink Automix (61.36%). Maxcem was found to have the lowest DC.SignificanceThe low %DC found raises questions as to whether these materials can be successfully used in clinical applications, where light attenuation takes place. Increased irradiation times could potentially lead to higher %DC, in applications where light is not completely blocked by the overlying restoration.     

Is adhesive cementation of endodontic posts necessary?

Recently, the appropriate, durable bond of adhesive systems and composite resin cements to retain endodontic posts was challenged. The question arises whether it would be possible to place glass fiber posts in a less technique sensitive conventional nonadhesive approach. The influence of nonadhesive, self-adhesive, and etch-and-rinse systems on load capability of postendodontic restorations was studied. Human maxillary central incisors were divided into 4 groups (n = 10). Teeth were endodontically treated and restored by using glass fiber posts luted with different cements/composite resin combinations: (1) RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany)/Clearfil Core (Kuraray Europe, Duesseldorf, Germany), (2) RelyX Unicem/LuxaCore, (3) zinc phosphate cement/Clearfil, and (4) LuxaCore (DMG, Hamburg, Germany)/Clearfil. A 2 mm-ferrule preparation was performed. All specimens received adhesively luted all-ceramic crowns and were exposed to thermal cycling and mechanical loading before subsequent static loading. Significant differences between the experimental groups regarding load capability and fracture patterns were observed. The conventional non-adhesive post cementation is less reliable to withstand simulated functional forces compared to adhesive approaches.     

Challenges in luting fibre posts: Adhesion to the post and to the dentine

Objective

To investigate the relationship between physicochemical interactions of resin luting cements with dentine and retention of fibre posts in root canals.

Effect of chlorhexidine application on long-term shear bond strength of resin cements to dentin

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of chlorhexidine [CH] on dentin bond strength of three resin cements after 1 year of water storage.MethodsA flat middle dentin surface was prepared on 120 extracted premolars. The teeth were randomly divided into 6 groups of 20 specimens each according to the resin cement used: Panavia F2.0, Variolink II, and RelyX Unicem, with or without CH application. After cementation of an indirect composite rod [Z250], one subgroup [n = 10] was tested after 24 h in water at 37 °C and the other subgroup [n = 10] was tested after 1 year storage in water plus thermocycling. A shear bond strength [SBS] test was performed. The data [in MPa] were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey tests [P < 0.05].ResultsThree-way ANOVA [resin cement, CH and time] indicated that Variolink II had the highest strength [16.65 ± 3.60] and RelyX Unicem had the lowest strength [9.30 ± 4.07]. Chlorhexidine application increased SBS [13.31 ± 4.61] compared to samples without CH [12.16 ± 5.04] [P = 0.04]. Initial SBS [15.63 ± 4.37] was significantly higher than after 1 year of storage [9.85 ± 3.36] [P < 0.001]. Separate two-way ANOVA for 24-h and 1-year data showed that cement had a significant effect but CH and its interaction had no significant effect at 24 h, whereas at 1 year the two factors and their interaction differed significantly [P ≤ 0.001].ConclusionsChlorhexidine 2% can diminish the loss of bonding effectiveness over time associated to etch-and-rinse and self-etch cements, although it appears not have any effect on self-adhesive cement.     

Effect of three different preparation designs on the marginal adaptation of indirect overlay restoration fabricated from lithium disilicate ceramic material: An in-vitro comparative study

ObjectivesMarginal adaptation is considered one of the key factors influencing the success of indirect restorations. This study aimed to estimate the marginal fit of lithium disilicate overlays with three distinct preparation designs before and after cementation.MethodsThirty maxillary first premolars were divided into the hollow chamfer design (HCD¹) group, butt-joint design (BJD²) group, and conventional occlusal box design (COD³) group (n = 10 each). The samples were scanned using an intra-oral scanner, and overlays were fabricated using computer-assisted design and milled on a computer-assisted machine. The finished restorations were luted using a self-adhesive resin RelyX Ultimate. The marginal gap was assessed using a digital microscope with 230X magnification power. Statistical analysis was conducted using analysis of variance and post hoc (Bonferroni correction) tests, assuming a significance level of 5%.ResultsThe HCD and BJD groups recorded significantly lower marginal gap, (11.39 ± 0.72, 16.29 ± 0.75) and (11.59 ± 0.75, 16.93 ± 0.65) respectively, than the COD group (24.57 ± 1.18, 34.45 ± 1.09) both pre- and post-cementation.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that modification of tooth preparation plays a significant role in the marginal adaptation of the lithium disilicate overlays. The gap was smaller with the HCD and BJD than with the COD, with a statistically significant difference.     

Marginal adaptation of three self-adhesive resin cements vs. a well-tried adhesive luting agent

This in vitro study compared the marginal adaptation of three self-adhesive composite cements with the clinically well-tried dentin adhesive system Panavia F 2.0. A total of 32 Empress 2 all-ceramic MOD-inlays (eight in each group) were luted using the self-adhesive composite cements Maxcem, Multilink Sprint, and RelyX Unicem Clicker; Panavia F 2.0 served as a clinically well-tried control. Each luted inlay underwent long-term water storage of 90 days as well as additional mechanical and thermal loading to simulate oral service. Marginal integrity was evaluated in both dentin and enamel finishing lines using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and dye penetration tests. Dye penetration was lowest for Panavia followed by RelyX Unicem. Maxcem and Multilink showed a considerable dye penetration of up to 60%. After aging, SEM analysis revealed a reduction of “perfect margin” areas for Multilink Sprint and RelyX Unicem in enamel and for Maxcem and Multilink in dentin. Compared with the well-tried system Panavia—which was assumed as the golden standard of adhesive luting systems—only the self-adhesive luting agent RelyX Unicem showed similar results of marginal adaptation after long-term water storage.     

Polymerization efficiency through translucent and opaque fiber posts and bonding to root dentin

PurposeTo investigate the polymerization efficiency through translucent and opaque glass fiber posts and the bond strength of a self-adhesive resin to root dentin.MethodsTranslucent and opaque silanated conical posts, identical in length, diameter and shape (n = 8), were cemented to incisor bovine roots using RelyX Unicem Clicker. Photoactivation was performed only through the posts. The roots were transversally sectioned (cervical, middle and apical thirds) and the push-out test was carried out. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Fisher's LSD method (5%). Failure modes were classified under magnification. An elastomer mold of a bovine incisor root was filled with flowable composite and the posts inserted into the mold. After photoactivation through the post and removal of unpolymerized material, the polymerization efficiency was estimated by percentage of mass gain (n = 5). Data were analyzed using t-test (5%).ResultsThe bond strength of the translucent post was higher than the opaque post for all root thirds. For both posts the bond strength at the cervical third was higher than at the middle and apical thirds. A predominance of adhesive failures was detected for all conditions. Mixed failures were more frequently observed for the opaque post. Almost all the composite polymerized and bonded to the extension of the translucent post, whereas polymerization of the composite was restricted to the cervical area of the opaque post.ConclusionsThe use of translucent post may positively influence the polymerization efficiency and bond strength of resin cement to intraradicular dentin.     

Curing potential and color stability of different resin-based luting materials

PurposeTo determine the curing potential and color stability of resin-based luting materials for aesthetic restorations.Material and MethodsFour resin-based luting agents were tested: traditional dual-activated resin cement (RelyX ARC, ARC), amine-free dual-activated resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, ULT), light-activated resin cement (RelyX Veneer, VEN), and pre-heated restorative resin composite (Filtek Supreme, PHC). Degree of C = C conversion was determined by infrared spectroscopy (n = 3) with direct light exposure or with interposition of 1.5-mm-thick ceramic (e.max Press HT) between the luting material and light. The curing potential considered the ratio between these two scenarios. Color difference (n = 6) was determined by CIELAB (ΔE_ab) and CIEDE2000 (ΔE₀₀) methods, by spectrophotometer measurements made 24 h after photoactivation and 90 days after storage in water. Data was submitted to ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05).ResultsThe luting agents affected both conversion and color stability. With ceramic, ARC produced the highest conversion among the tested groups (75 ± 1%) and the pre-heated composite (PHC) the lowest one (51 ± 3%), but the curing potential was similar for all materials. ULT produced lower ΔE_ab than ARC. PHC presented the lowest color difference when considered both CIELAB and CIE2000 methods (ΔE_ab 2.1 ± 0.4; ΔE₀₀ 1.6 ± 0.2).SignificanceAll luting strategies presented high curing potential. Amine-free dual-activated material was able to reduce color difference than that formulated with the amine component. Pre-heated composite produced the least color variation after storage.     

Dentin bonding of cements. The bonding of cements with dentin in combination with various indirect restorative materials

The number of both luting agents and restorative materials available on the market has rapidly increased. This study compared various types of luting agents when used to bond different indirect, laboratory restorative materials to dentin. Cylinders were produced of six restorative materials (gold alloy, titanium, feldspathic porcelain, leucite-glass ceramic, zirconia, and an indirect resin composite). Following relevant pretreatment, the end surface of the cylinders were luted to ground, human dentin with eight different luting agents (DeTrey Zinc [zinc phosphate cement], Fuji I [conventional glass ionomer cement], Fuji Plus [resin-modified glass ionomer cement], Variolink II [conventional etch-and-rinse resin cement], Panavia F2.0 and Multilink [self-etch resin cements], RelyX Unicem Aplicap and Maxcem [self-adhesive resin cements]). After water storage at 37 °C for one week, the shear bond strength of the specimens was measured and the fracture mode was examined stereo-microscopically. Restorative material and luting agent both had a significant effect on bond strength and there was a significant interaction between the two variables. The zinc phosphate cement and the glass ionomer cements resulted in the lowest bond strengths, whereas the highest bond strengths were found with the two self-etch and one of the self-adhesive resin cements.     

Luting glass ceramic restorations using a selfadhesive resin cement under different dentin conditions

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the bond strength of ceramic restorations luted using a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem, 3M ESPE) under different dentin conditions.

Material and Methods

In the experimental groups, ceramic restorations were luted to bovine incisors with RelyX Unicem under the following conditions: [Dry dentin]: surface was dried using air stream for 15 s; [Moist dentin]: excess dentin moisture was removed with absorbent paper; [Bonding agent]: Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) self-etching adhesive system was previously applied to dentin. In the Control group, cementation was done using an etch-and-rinse adhesive (Excite DSC) and Variolink II resin cement (Ivoclar Vivadent). Photoactivation of the resin cements was performed with UltraLume LED 5 unit (Ultradent). The restorations (n=5 per group) were sectioned into beams and microtensile testing was carried out. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey''s test (p<0.05). Failure modes were classified under Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) (×120 magnification).

Results

The bond strength was dependent on the moisture status of the dentin. Bond strength in the "dry dentin group" was significantly lower than that of all other groups, which showed similar results. A predominance of mixed failures was detected for the control group, while a predominance of adhesive failures was observed for the "bonding agent" and "dry dentin" groups. The "moist dentin" group presented predominantly cohesive failures within the luting material. The previous application of a self-etching adhesive showed no significant effect.

Conclusions

Only excess dentin moisture should be removed for the cementation of ceramic restorations with self-adhesive resin cements.     

Improved mechanical performance of self-adhesive resin cement filled with hybrid nanofibers-embedded with niobium pentoxide

ObjectivesIn this study hybrid nanofibers embedded with niobium pentoxide (Nb₂O₅) were synthesized, incorporated in self-adhesive resin cement, and their influence on physical-properties was evaluated.MethodsPoly(D,L-lactide), PDLLA cotton-wool-like nanofibers with and without silica-based sol–gel precursors were formulated and spun into submicron fibers via solution blow spinning, a rapid fiber forming technology. The morphology, chemical composition and thermal properties of the spun fibers were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), respectively. Produced fibers were combined with a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200, 3 M ESPE) in four formulations: (1) U200 resin cement (control); (2) U200 + 1 wt.% PDLLA fibers; (3) U200 + 1 wt.% Nb₂O₅-filled PDLLA composite fibers and (4) U200 + 1 wt.% Nb₂O₅/SiO₂-filled PDLLA inorganic–organic hybrid fibers. Physical properties were assessed in flexure by 3-point bending (n = 10), Knoop microhardness (n = 5) and degree of conversion (n = 3). Data were analyzed with One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD (α = 5%).ResultsComposite fibers formed of PDLLA-Nb₂O₅ exhibited an average diameter of ∼250 nm, and hybrid PDLLA + Nb₂O₅/SiO₂ fibers were slightly larger, ∼300 nm in diameter. There were significant differences among formulations for hardness and flexural strength (p < 0.05). Degree of conversion of resin cement was not affected for all groups, except for Group 4 (p < 0.05).SignificanceHybrid reinforcement nanofibers are promising as fillers for dental materials. The self-adhesive resin cement with PDLLA + Nb₂O₅ and PDLLA + Nb₂O₅/SiO₂ presented superior mechanical performance than the control group.     

Probability of interface imperfections within SEM cross-sections of adhesively luted GFP

ObjectivesTo calculate the probability of interface imperfections within SEM cross-sections of adhesively luted GFP depending on the level of analysis and the cement application method by means of LOM (light-optical microscopic evaluation method).Material and methodsFour groups of artificial root canals received GFPs (n = 5) under following experimental conditions: I = RelyX? Unicem, applied with application aid, II = RelyX? Unicem, III = Panavia F 2.0 and IV = Variolink II. In groups II–IV only posts were loaded with cement (i.e. conventional post cementation). After GFP cementation, standardized photographs were taken perpendicularly to post surface under light-optical microscope from two opposite sides. The length of homogenous cement interface areas were measured using surface-analyzing software. The homogenous areas were related to length of apical, middle, cervical post section and to complete post length to generate the probabilities (%) of hitting imperfections when using SEM cross-section analysis.ResultsThe probabilities (%) of hitting imperfections within SEM cross-sections for cervical, middle, and apical level of analysis were: I = 78, 64, 82; II = 89, 98, 99; III = 72, 91, 99; and IV = 85, 91, 97, respectively. For complete post length median values of probabilities (%) were: I = 75; II = 95; III = 87; and IV = 91.SignificanceThe probabilities show, that SEM cross-section evaluation concerning detection of cement interface imperfections of adhesively luted GFPs depends on the cement application method and the level of analysis and seeming therefore not always unrestricted representative for the whole specimen.     

Tensile bond strength of indirect composites luted with three new self-adhesive resin cements to dentin

Objective

The aims of this study were to evaluate the tensile bond strengths between indirect composites and dentin of 3 recently developed self-adhesive resin cements and to determine mode of failure by SEM.

Material and Methods

Exposed dentin surfaces of 70 mandibular third molars were used. Teeth were randomly divided into 7 groups: Group 1 (control group): direct composite resin restoration (Alert) with etch-and-rinse adhesive system (Bond 1 primer/adhesive), Group 2: indirect composite restoration (Estenia) luted with a resin cement (Cement-It) combined with the same etch-and-rinse adhesive, Group 3: direct composite resin restoration with self-etch adhesive system (Nano-Bond), Group 4: indirect composite restoration luted with the resin cement combined with the same self-etch adhesive, Groups 5-7: indirect composite restoration luted with self-adhesive resin cements (RelyX Unicem, Maxcem, and Embrace WetBond, respectively) onto the non-pretreated dentin surfaces. Tensile bond strengths of groups were tested with a universal testing machine at a constant speed of 1 mm/min using a 50 kgf load cell. Results were statistically analyzed by the Student''s t-test. The failure modes of all groups were also evaluated.

Results

The indirect composite restorations luted with the self-adhesive resin cements (groups 5-7) showed better results compared to the other groups (p<0.05). Group 4 showed the weakest bond strength (p>0.05). The surfaces of all debonded specimens showed evidence of both adhesive and cohesive failure.

Conclusion

The new universal self-adhesive resins may be considered an alternative for luting indirect composite restorations onto non-pretreated dentin surfaces.