Higher 2-Year Cumulative Incidence of Mental Health Disorders Following Antibiotic Spacer Placement for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection following Total Joint Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe relationship of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treatment on the development and relapse of mood disorders remains largely unreported. This study aims to compare the incidence of different mental health disorders following antibiotic spacer placement for chronic PJI when compared to aseptic revisions and primary procedures.MethodsPatients who underwent antibiotic spacer for septic total hip and knee arthroplasty (PJI THA/TKA) were identified in the PearlDiver Database using Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) codes for hip and knee antibiotic spacers. Patients who underwent aseptic revision and primary-THA/TKA were also identified using CPT codes. The incidences of depressive, anxiety, bipolar, psychotic, and stress disorders were identified within 2 years following the index procedures via Kaplan–Meier Analysis.ResultsThe risk of depressive (hazard ratio (HR): 1.5; P < .001) and stress (HR: 1.5; P < .001) disorders were significantly higher in those who underwent PJI-THA when compared to aseptic revision, with the added risk of bipolar when compared to primary THA. The risk of depressive (HR: 1.6; P < .001), stress (HR: 1.4; P < .001), bipolar (HR: 1.3; P < .001), and psychotic disorders (HR: 1.5; P = .003) were significantly higher in those who underwent PJI-TKA when compared to aseptic revision, with the added risk of anxiety when compared to primary TKA.ConclusionPatients who undergo spacer placement for septic-THA/TKA have a disproportionately higher incidence of mental health disorders within 2 years following surgery when compared those undergoing aseptic revisions and primary procedures. Due to this higher risk, physicians should strongly consider collaborative care with psychiatrists or mental health professionals.Level of EvidenceIII.     

High Mortality After Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infection is Related to Preoperative Morbidity and the Disease Process but Not Treatment

BackgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) mortality rate is approximately 20%. The etiology for high mortality remains unknown. The objective of this study was to determine whether mortality was associated with preoperative morbidity (frailty), sequalae of treatment, or the PJI disease process itself.MethodsA multicenter observational study was completed comparing 184 patients treated with septic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to a control group of 38 patients treated with aseptic revision TKA. Primary outcomes included time and the cause of death. Secondary outcomes included preoperative comorbidities and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCMI) measured preoperatively and at various postoperative timepoints.ResultsThe septic revision TKA cohort experienced earlier mortality compared to the aseptic cohort, with a higher mortality rate at 90 days, 1, 2, and 3 years after index revision surgery (P = .01). There was no significant difference for any single cause of death (P > .05 for each). The mean preoperative CCMI was higher (P = .005) in the septic revision TKA cohort. Both septic and aseptic cohorts experienced a significant increase in CCMI from the preoperative to 3 years postoperative (P < .0001 and P = .002) and time of death (P < .0001 both) timepoints. The septic revision TKA cohort had a higher CCMI 3 years postoperatively (P = .001) and at time of death (P = .046), but not one year postoperatively (P = .119).ConclusionCompared to mortality from aseptic revision surgery, septic revision TKA is associated with earlier mortality, but there is no single specific etiology. As quantified by changes in CCMI, PJI mortality was associated with both frailty and the PJI disease process, but not treatment.     

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Satisfaction 1 to 3 Years After Revisions of Total Knee Arthroplasties for Unexplained Pain Versus Aseptic Loosening

BackgroundIt is unknown if patients are relieved of pain after knee arthroplasty revision for unexplained pain. The aim of this cross-sectional case-control study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and satisfaction 1 to 3 years after revision of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) for the indications of unexplained pain versus aseptic loosening.MethodsWe included 384 patients undergoing TKA revision for the indications of unexplained pain and aseptic loosening from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020 from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register. A total of 81 patients were revised for unexplained pain and 303 for aseptic loosening. Questionnaires including PROMs (Oxford Knee Score, EQ-5D-5L, and Forgotten Joint Score) and satisfaction with the surgery on a 0-100 scale (100 = not satisfied; 0 = very satisfied) were sent to digitally secured mailboxes. Time from revision to data collection was a median 3.1 years (range, 1.4-4.4 years).ResultsMedian Oxford Knee Score was 25 (interquartile range [IQR] 15) versus 31 (IQR 18) 1-3 years after revisions for unexplained pain versus aseptic loosening, P = .009. Median EQ-5D-5L was 0.6 (IQR 0.4) versus 0.8 (IQR 0.3) for unexplained pain versus aseptic loosening, P = .009. Median Forgotten Joint Score was 50 (IQR 7) versus 50 (IQR 16) for unexplained pain versus aseptic loosening, P = .905. Satisfaction was 75 (IQR 38) for unexplained pain and 50 (IQR 73) for aseptic loosening, P < .001.ConclusionPatients undergoing TKA revision for the indication of unexplained pain had worse results on PROMs than those revised for aseptic loosening. Likewise, patients revised for unexplained pain were less satisfied compared to patients revised for aseptic loosening. This information is valuable to both surgeons and patients when candidates for revision surgery are selected, to obtain the best possible outcomes.     

Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection Increases Following Early Aseptic Revision Surgery of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundIt is important to identify risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty in order to mitigate the substantial social and economic burden. The objective of this study is to evaluate early aseptic revision surgery as a potential risk factor for PJI following total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsPatients who underwent primary THA or TKA with early aseptic revision were identified in 2 national insurance databases. Control groups of patients who did not undergo revision were identified and matched 10:1 to study patients. Rates of PJI at 1 and 2 years postoperatively following revision surgery were calculated and compared to controls using a logistic regression analysis.ResultsIn total, 328 Medicare and 222 Humana patients undergoing aseptic revision THA within 1 year of index THA were found to have significantly increased risk of PJI at 1 year (5.49% vs 0.91%, odds ratio [OR] 5.61, P < .001 for Medicare; 7.21% vs 0.68%, OR 11.34, P < .001 for Humana) and 2 years (5.79% vs 1.10%, OR 4.79, P < .001 for Medicare; 8.11% vs 1.04%, OR 9.05, P < .001 for Humana). Similarly for TKA, 190 Medicare and 226 Humana patients who underwent aseptic revision TKA within 1 year were found to have significantly higher rates of PJI at 1 year (6.48% vs 1.16%, OR 7.69, P < .001 for Medicare; 6.19% vs 1.28%, OR 4.89, P < .001 for Humana) and 2 years (8.42% vs 1.58%, OR 6.57, P < .001 for Medicare; 7.08% vs 1.50%, OR 4.50, P < .001 for Humana).ConclusionEarly aseptic revision surgery following THA and TKA is associated with significantly increased risks of subsequent PJI within 2 years.     

Increased Revisions in Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty After Periarticular Open Reduction Internal Fixation Compared With Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis

BackgroundPrior studies on conversion total knee arthroplasty (cTKA) have reported increased technical challenges and risk of complications compared with primary knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare two-year postoperative complication/revision rates between patients undergoing cTKA after prior periarticular open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and those undergoing primary TKA.MethodsPatients who underwent cTKA after prior periarticular ORIF of the ipsilateral knee were identified in a national all-payer claims database from 2010 to 2018. This ORIF-cTKA cohort was propensity matched to participants undergoing primary TKA based on age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, and obesity status. Univariate analysis was performed to analyze differences in two-year complication and revision rates.ResultsAfter propensity matching, 823 patients were included in the ORIF-cTKA cohort and 1640 patients in the primary TKA cohort. No differences in demographics or comorbidities existed between cohorts. Relative to the primary TKA cohort, the ORIF-cTKA cohort had significantly higher incidences of all-cause revision (5.47% vs 2.47%, P = .001), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI; 4.74% vs 1.34%, P < .001), and intraoperative or postoperative periprosthetic fracture (1.58% vs 0.55%, P = .01) at two years postoperatively. There was also a nonsignificant trend toward increased rates of aseptic loosening (1.82% vs 0.91%, P = .052) in the ORIF-cTKA.ConclusionRelative to primary TKA, cTKA after periarticular ORIF is associated with significantly increased rates of all-cause revision, PJI, and periprosthetic fracture at two years postoperatively. Surgeons should counsel these patients about the increased risks of these postoperative complications and consider treating them as high risk for PJI in the perioperative period.     

Prior Knee Arthroscopy Is Associated With Increased Risk of Revision After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundKnee arthroscopy (KA) is frequently performed to provide improved joint function and pain relief. However, outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after prior KA are not fully understood. The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between prior KA within 2 years of TKA on revision rates after TKA.MethodsData were collected from the Humana insurance database using the PearlDiver Patient Records Database from 2006 to 2017. Subjects were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases procedure codes to identify primary TKA. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based upon a history of prior KA. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine association between KA and outcomes at 2-year postoperative period.ResultsIn total, 138,019 patients were included in this study, with 3357 (2.4%) patients receiving a KA before TKA and 134,662 (97.6%) patients who did not. The most common reason for KA was osteoarthritis (40.0%), followed by medial tear of the meniscus (26.0%) and chondromalacia (21%.0). After adjustment, prior KA was associated with increased revision rate (odds ratio [OR], 1.392; P = .003), postoperative stiffness (OR, 1.251; P = .012), periprosthetic joint infection (OR, 1.326; P < .001), and aseptic loosening (OR, 1.401; P = .048).ConclusionPrior KA is significantly associated with increased 2-year TKA revision rate. The most common etiology for arthroscopy was osteoarthritis. The results of the study, showing that arthroscopy before TKA substantially increases the rates of revision, PJI, aseptic loosening, and stiffness, lend further credence to the idea that patients may be better served by nonsurgical management of their degenerative pathology until they become candidates for TKA. Subjecting this population to arthroscopy appears to offer limited benefit at the cost of poorer outcomes when they require arthroplasty in the future.Level of EvidenceLevel III therapeutic study.     

Is Conversion TKA a Primary or Revision? Clinical Course and Complication Risks Approximating Revision TKA Rather Than Primary TKA

BackgroundConversion total knee arthroplasty (convTKA) is associated with increased resource utilization and costs compared with primary TKA. The purpose of this study is to compare 1) surgical time, 2) hospitalization length (LOS), 3) complications, 4) infection, and 5) readmissions in patients undergoing convTKA to both primary TKA and revision TKA patients.MethodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried from 2008 to 2018. Patients undergoing convTKA (n = 1,665, 0.5%) were defined by selecting Current Procedural Terminology codes 27,447 and 20,680. We compared the outcomes of interest to patients undergoing primary TKA (n = 348,624) and to patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA (n = 8213). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the relative risk of postoperative complications.ResultsCompared with patients undergoing primary TKA, convTKA patients were younger (P < .001), had lower body mass index (P < .001), and were less likely to be American Society of Anesthesiologist class III/IV (P < .001). These patients had significantly longer operative times (122.6 vs 90.3 min, P < .001), increased LOS (P < .001), increased risks for any complication (OR 1.94), surgical site infection (OR 1.84), reoperation (OR 2.18), and readmissions (OR 1.60) after controlling for confounders. Compared with aseptic TKA revisions, operative times were shorter (122.6 vs 148.2 min, P < .001), but LOS (2.91 vs 2.95 days, P = .698) was similar. Furthermore, relative risk for any complication (P = .350), surgical site infection (P = .964), reoperation (P = .296), and readmissions (P = .844) did not differ.ConclusionConversion TKA procedures share more similarities with revision TKA rather than primary TKA procedures. Without a distinct procedural and diagnosis-related group, there are financial disincentives to care for these complex patients.Level of EvidenceII.     

Surgical Helmet Systems Are Associated With a Lower Rate of Prosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Combined Results From the New Zealand Joint Registry and Surgical Site Infection Improvement Programme

BackgroundThis study aimed to identify the risk factors, in particular the use of surgical helmet systems (SHSs), for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Data recorded by the New Zealand Surgical Site Infection Improvement Programme (SSIIP) and the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) were combined and analyzed.MethodsPrimary TKA procedures performed between July 2013 and June 2018 that were recorded by both the SSIIP and NZJR were analyzed. Two primary outcomes were measured: (1) PJI within 90 days as recorded by the SSIIP and (2) revision TKA for deep infection within 6 months as recorded by the NZJR. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for both outcomes with results considered significant at P < .05.ResultsA total of 19,322 primary TKAs were recorded by both databases in which 97 patients had a PJI within 90 days as recorded by the SSIIP (0.50%), and 90 patients had a revision TKA for deep infection within 6 months (0.47%) as recorded by the NZJR. An SHS was associated with a lower rate of PJI (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, P = .008) and revision for deep infection (adjusted OR = 0.55, P = .022) than conventional gowning. Male sex (adjusted OR = 2.6, P < .001) and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score >2 were patient risk factors for infection (OR = 2.63, P < .001 for PJI and OR = 1.75, P = .017 for revision for deep infection).ConclusionUsing contemporary data from the SSIIP and NZJR, the use of the SHS was associated with a lower rate of PJI after primary TKA than conventional surgical gowning. Male sex and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score continue to be risk factors for infection.     

The Impact of Epilepsy on Complication Rates After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score–Matched Cohort Study

BackgroundIt is unclear how epilepsy may affect total joint arthroplasty outcomes. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of epilepsy on prosthesis-related complications following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using a national database. Patients who have epilepsy underwent a primary THA (n = 6,981) and TKA (n = 4,987) and were matched 1:4 (THA, n = 27,924; TKA, n = 19,948). Rates of low-energy falls and prosthesis-related complications within 2 years postoperatively were compared for patients who did and did not have epilepsy with multivariable logistic regression.ResultsAfter primary TKA, patients who have epilepsy exhibited significantly higher rates of aseptic revision (4.3% versus 3.5%, odds ratio [OR] 1.21, P = .017) and revision for prosthetic joint infection (1.8% versus 1.3%, OR 1.29, P = .041). THA patients who have epilepsy exhibited significantly higher rates of prosthetic dislocation (3.2% versus 1.9%, OR 1.54, P < .001), periprosthetic fracture (2.2% versus 0.8%, OR 2.39, P < .001), and aseptic loosening (1.7% versus 1.1%, OR 1.40, P = .002). Rates of low-energy falls within 2 years after TKA (14.1% versus 6.4%, OR 2.19, P < .001) and THA (33.6% versus 7.5%, OR 5.95, P < .001) were also significantly higher for patients who have epilepsy.ConclusionEpilepsy was associated with significantly higher rates of falls (P < .001) and prosthesis-related complications after primary THA (P < .05) and TKA (P < .05). Precautions should be implemented in this population during intraoperative and perioperative decision-making to reduce complication risk.Level of EvidenceLevel III.     

Etiology and Complications of Early Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Within 90 Days

BackgroundThe etiology, complications, and rerevision risks of early aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) within 90 days are insufficiently documented.MethodsA national insurance claims database (PearlDiver Technologies, Fort Wayne, IN) was queried for patients who underwent unilateral aseptic revision THA within 90 days of the index procedure using administrative codes. Patients who underwent revision for infection, without minimum 2-year follow-up, and younger than 18 years were excluded. This cohort was matched based on gender, age, and Charlson Comorbidity Index to a control group of patients who underwent primary THA without revision within 90 days. Two-year rerevision and 90-day complication rates were recorded. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used as appropriate for statistical comparison.ResultsFour hundred two patients met the inclusion criteria for early aseptic revision within 90 days of the index procedure and were matched to the control group. The overall 2-year rerevision rate was higher in the early revision group compared with control group (14.9% vs 2.5%, P < .001). Complications within 90 days occurred more frequently in the early revision group, including blood transfusion (10.2% vs 3.2%, P < .001), deep vein thrombosis (9.0% vs 3.2%, P = .001), and pulmonary embolism (2.74% vs 0.75%, P = .031). The most common reasons for early aseptic revision were dislocation (41.5%), fracture (38.1%), and loosening (17.4%).ConclusionEarly aseptic revision THA is associated with significantly higher 90-day complication rates and 2-year rerevision rates compared with a control group of primary THA without revision. The most common reasons for acute early revision were dislocation, fracture, and mechanical loosening.Level of EvidenceLevel III.     

Long-Term Wear-Related Complications of Cross-Linked Versus Conventional Polyethylene After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

BackgroundHighly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) liners have been developed to address the wear-related problems associated with conventional polyethylene (CPE) such as osteolysis or aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this systematic meta-analysis, we compared the long-term efficacy in preventing radiological osteolysis and revision surgery between HXLPE and CPE.MethodsWe included 14 studies that compared HXLPE and CPE reporting the incidence of wear-related complications with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. We investigated 5 wear-related complications: osteolysis, excessive wear, linear wear rate, revision surgery due to wear, and progress of osteolysis/aseptic loosening. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis to estimate odds ratio (OR) and a proportional meta-analysis to estimate the incidence of each complication.ResultsAmong 1,175 THAs, 220 osteolysis and 78 wear-related revisions were detected. The use of HXLPE reduced the risk of overall osteolysis (OR 0.30; P = .001), excessive wear (OR 0.10; P < .001), linear wear rate (weighted mean difference 0.09; P < .001), the risk of overall wear-related revisions (OR 0.06; P < .001), and revisions due to aseptic loosening (OR 0.23; P = .015). As per the proportional meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of osteolysis, excessive wear, and the overall wear-related revision rate were 14%, 8%, and 3% in HXLPE and 25%, 33%, and 20% in CPE, respectively.ConclusionThe current evidence shows that HXLPE dramatically reduced the rate of osteolysis and wear-related revision surgery. However, as polyethylene wear and osteolysis still lead to revision surgery, ongoing clinical and retrieval studies are required to analyze long-term outcomes.     

High Rate of Re-Revision in Patients Less Than 55 Years of Age Undergoing Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThere are limited data on the outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty in young patients. We sought to characterize the re-revision-free survival and risk factors for re-revision in patients less than 55 years who underwent aseptic revision TKA.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 197 revision TKAs at a mean follow-up of 5 years. Mean age was 49 years; mean body mass index was 31 kg/m². Twenty-seven (14%) patients had at least 1 prior revision TKA. The most common indications for revision included instability (29%), arthrofibrosis (26%), and aseptic loosening (24%). Constraint included the following: 59 posterior-stabilized (30%), 123 varus-valgus constrained (62%), and 15 hinged (8%). Components revised included the following: 93 femur/tibia (47%), 68 polyethylene-only (35%), 19 femur-only (10%), and 17 other (9%). Survivorship free from re-revision was calculated via the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate Cox proportional regression was utilized to identify risk factors for re-revision.ResultsSurvivorship free from any re-revision at 5 years was 80%. In the multivariate analysis, patients with a prior revision (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.78, P = .02), an isolated polyethylene exchange (HR = 3.0, P = .004), and a hinged prosthesis (HR = 3.47, P = .05) were significant risk factors for lower revision-free survival. Forty-two patients (21%) underwent re-revision, most commonly for periprosthetic joint infection (7%), instability (6%), and aseptic loosening (5%). Re-revision occurred in 18/68 (26%) patients undergoing an isolated polyethylene exchange.ConclusionPatients less than 55 years undergoing revision TKA have a modest 5-year revision-free survival of 80%. Patients with prior revision TKAs (HR = 2.78), hinge type prostheses (HR = 3.47), and polyethylene-only revisions (HR = 3.0) had higher revision rates.     

Single-Stage Revision of the Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Improved Functional Outcomes: A Propensity Score–Matched Cohort Study

BackgroundSingle-stage revision is an alternative to the standard 2-stage revision, potentially minimizing morbidities and improving functional outcomes. This study aimed at comparing single-stage and 2-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with regard to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complication rates.Methods:A total of 185 consecutive revision TKA patients for chronic PJI with complete preoperative and postoperative PROMs were investigated. A total of 44 patients with single-stage revision TKA were matched to 88 patients following 2-stage revision TKA using propensity score matching, yielding a total of 132 propensity score–matched patients for analysis. Patient demographics and clinical information including reinfection and readmission rates were evaluated.Results:There was no significant difference in preoperative PROMs between propensity score–matched single-stage and 2-stage revision TKA cohorts. Postoperatively, significantly higher PROMs for single-stage revision TKA were observed for Knee disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score physical function (62.2 vs 51.9, P < .01), physical function short form 10A (42.8 vs 38.1, P < .01), PROMIS SF Physical (44.8 vs 41.0, P = .01), and PROMIS SF Mental (50.5 vs 47.1, P = .02). There was no difference between propensity score–matched single-stage and 2-stage revision TKA cohorts for clinical outcomes including reinfection rates (25.0% vs 27.2%, P = .78) and 90-day readmission rates (22.7% vs 25.0%, P = .77).ConclusionThis study illustrated that single-stage revision TKA for chronic PJI may be associated with superior patient-reported outcomes compared to 2-stage revision for the infected TKA using a variety of PROMs. Improved PROMs were not accompanied by differences in complication rates between both cohorts, suggesting that single-stage revision TKA may provide an effective alternative to 2-stage revision in patients with chronic TKA PJI.     

Utility and Prognostic Ability of a Diagnostic Injection Before Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundDiagnostic injections are commonly utilized in the workup of painful total knee arthroplasties (TKA), particularly when the diagnosis remains unclear. However, current literature provides limited evidence regarding the utility and prognostic capability of anesthetic injections in this scenario. This study sought to establish the role of diagnostic injections in predicting successful revision TKA.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted on 144 consecutive aseptic revision TKAs receiving diagnostic anesthetic injections. Instability (57.6%) and aseptic loosening (33.3%) comprised most revision etiologies. Patient-reported percentage pain relief after the injection was statistically correlated with KOOS JR, Knee Society Score, UCLA Activity Level, and satisfaction scores.ResultsAbout 74.3% (107/144) of revision TKAs reported >50% pain relief after injection. There were no differences in pain relief based on revision indication (P = .841). Improvement from preoperative activity level was greater in the >50% pain relief group (P = .024). Four-month patient satisfaction did not differ between patients who reported >50% and ≤50% pain relief (67% vs. 66%, P = .130). About 64% of patients who reported >50% pain relief were satisfied at minimum 1-year follow-up, compared with only 47% of those who reported ≤50% pain relief after diagnostic injection (P < .001).ConclusionStudy results show that patients reporting >50% pain relief after diagnostic injection have improvements in activity level and maintain greater satisfaction at minimum 1-year than those reporting ≤50% pain relief. Expectations for improvement after revision TKA should be tempered if diagnostic anesthetic injection yields minimal subjective pain relief.     

Utilization of Debridement,Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty Over a Decade in the United States

BackgroundReported clinical outcomes have varied for debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) and little is known regarding trends in utilization. We sought to evaluate the rate of DAIR utilization for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) over a decade and clinical factors associated with these trends.MethodsA retrospective study of primary TKAs and THAs was performed using Medicare data from 2005 to 2014 using the PearlDiver database platform. Current Procedural Technology and International Classification of Diseases Ninth Edition codes identified patients who underwent a surgical revision for PJI, whether revision was a DAIR, as well as associated clinical factors including timing from index arthroplasty.ResultsThe proportion of revision TKAs and THAs performed using DAIR was 27% and 12% across all years, respectively. This proportion varied by year for TKAs and THAs with a linear trend toward increasing relative use of DAIR estimated at 1.4% and 0.9% per year (P < .001; P < .001). DAIR for TKA and THA performed within 90 days increased at a faster rate, 3.4% and 2.1% per year (P < .001; P < .001). Trends over time in TKA DAIRs showed an association with Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), 0-5 group increasing at 2.0% per year (P = .03) and patients >85 years (P = .04).ConclusionThe proportion of revision arthroplasty cases for PJI managed with DAIR has been increasing over time in the United States, with the most substantial increase seen <90 days from index arthroplasty. Age, gender, and ECI had a minimal association with this trend, except in the TKA population >85 years and in those with a very low ECI score.     

Higher Activity Level Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Not Deleterious to Mid-Term Implant Survivorship

BackgroundThe impact of a patient’s activity level following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial, with some surgeons concerned about increased polyethylene wear, aseptic loosening, and revisions. The purpose of this study is to report on implant survivorship and outcomes of high activity patients compared to low activity patients after TKA.MethodsA retrospective review identified 1611 patients (2038 knees) that underwent TKA with 5-year minimum follow-up. Patients were divided in 2 groups based on their University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity level: low activity (LA) (UCLA ≤5) and high activity (HA) (UCLA ≥6). Outcomes included range of motion, Knee Society scores, complications, and reoperations. Parametric survival analysis was performed to evaluate the significance of activity level on survivorship while controlling for age, gender, preoperative pain, Knee Society clinical scores, Knee Society functional scores, and body mass index (BMI).ResultsMean follow-up was 11.4 years (range 5.1-15.9). The LA group had significantly more female patients, were older, had higher BMI, and had lower functional scores preoperatively (all with P < .001). The HA group had significantly higher improvements in Knee Society scores (P < .001) and pain postoperatively (P < .001). Revisions were performed in 4% of the LA group and 1.7% knees of the HA group (P = .003). After controlling for age, gender, preoperative pain, Knee Society clinical scores, Knee Society functional scores, and BMI, a higher postoperative activity level remained a significant factor for improved survivorship with an odds ratio of 2.4 (95% confidence interval 1.2-4.7, P = .011). The all-cause 12-year survivorship was 98% for the HA group and 95.3% for the LA group (P = .003). The aseptic 12-year survivorship was 98.4% for the HA group and 96.3% for the LA group (P = .02).ConclusionHighly active patients had increased survivorship at 5-year minimum follow-up compared to lower activity patients after TKA. Patient activity level after TKA may not need to be limited with modern implants.     

Ten-Year Follow-Up of High-Flexion Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched-Control Study

BackgroundHigh-flexion total knee arthroplasty (HF-TKA) prostheses were designed with hopes of improving knee function. Studies have suggested increased failure with HF-TKAs. The purpose is to compare clinical results of HF-TKA versus conventional TKA (C-TKA) from the same implant system with long-term follow-up.MethodsThis review of prostheses implanted between 2004 and 2007 matched 145 of 179 possible HF-TKAs with 145 of 1347 possible C-TKAs. Mean follow-up was 121.5 ± 20.3 months. We were unable to match 12 HF-TKAs. HF-TKAs with less than 8-year follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome was failure requiring revision. Secondary outcomes included range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Scores (KSS), and radiolucent lines.ResultsIn the matched cohort, there were 15 HF-TKA reoperations, 8 of which involved component revisions. There were 12 reoperations in the C-TKA cohort but no component revisions (P = .001). The analysis of the unmatched cohorts revealed a higher revision rate for HF-TKAs (P = .039) (HF-TKA: 10/179 vs C-TKA: 27/1347). At final follow-up, HF-TKAs exhibited more prosthesis radiolucent lines without evidence of loosening. Particularly, HF-TKAs demonstrated more femoral zone IV radiolucencies (38.7%) at final follow-up compared with C-TKAs (13.8%) (P < .001). There were no differences found between cohorts in ROM or KSS.ConclusionThis study found an increased incidence of failure requiring revision with the HF-TKA in the matched and unmatched analyses. Higher incidences of radiolucent lines were found with HF-TKA. With no observed differences in ROM or KSS and a higher rate of failure with HF-TKA, there appears to be no advantage for use of the HF-TKA.     

Does Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Increase the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BackgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is among the leading causes of failure in total joint arthroplasty. A recently proposed risk factor for PJI is symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (sBPH). This study aims to determine if sBPH is associated with PJI following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsUsing the Mariner all-payer claims database, 1745 patients with sBPH undergoing primary THA were propensity-matched with 3490 controls, and 3053 patients with sBPH undergoing primary TKA were propensity-matched with 6106 controls. Additionally, the same 1745 patients with sBPH undergoing THA were compared to 317,360 prematched controls, and the same 3053 patients with sBPH undergoing TKA were compared to 557,730 prematched controls. Univariate analysis was conducted using chi-squared or ANOVA where appropriate.ResultsAt two years postoperatively, patients with sBPH were not at significantly increased risk for PJI following primary THA (1.54% vs 1.43%; P = .745) and TKA (1.99% vs 2.14%; P = .642) relative to postmatch controls. Compared to matched controls, THA patients with sBPH had an increased 90-day incidence of anemia (P < .001), blood transfusion (P < .001), and urinary tract infection (UTI; P < .001). Total knee arthroplasty patients with sBPH had an increased 90-day incidence of anemia (P < .001), blood transfusion (P < .001), cellulitis (P = .023), renal failure (P = .030), heart failure (P = .029), and UTI (P < .001) relative to matched controls.ConclusionIn primary THA and TKA, sBPH does not appear to be an independent risk factor for PJI within two years postoperatively. However, clinicians should be cognizant of the significantly increased risk for postoperative UTI in this patient population.     

Manipulation Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With Increased Rates of Infection and Revision

BackgroundStiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a disabling complication and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is often performed as an early intervention. Few studies have focused on the revision risk, infection risk, demographics, and clinical outcomes in Medicare patients undergoing MUA following primary TKA.MethodsWe reviewed 142,440 patients who had primary TKA from a national database and identified 3,652 patients (2.6%) who underwent MUA. Patient demographics and comorbid conditions were evaluated to identify risk factors. Incidence of revision and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) at 1-, 2-, and 5-year time points in a cohort of MUA patients was compared to patients who did not undergo MUA. Multivariate Cox regressions were used for statistical analyses.ResultsThe incidence of MUA was higher in Black versus White individuals (4.1 versus 2.5%, P < .001). Revision risk was significantly greater in the MUA group at 1-, 2-, and 5-year time points with a hazard ratio (HR) of, 3.81, 3.90, and 3.22 respectively, P < .001. One- and 2-year revision risk was significantly greater when MUA occurred at 6 to 12 months post-TKA when compared to <3 months, P < .05. Risk of PJI was significantly greater in the MUA group with a HR of 2.2, 2.2, and 2.1 at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively P < .001.ConclusionThe incidence of MUA was 2.6%. There was an increased incidence of revision surgery and PJI in patients undergoing MUA. Patients at increased risk for stiffness following TKA should be closely monitored and treated with early intervention to minimize risk of poor outcomes.     

Increased Synovial Inflammatory Markers in Aseptic Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation

BackgroundIn cases of total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation, a synovial fluid aspiration is often performed to evaluate for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). It is currently unclear how aseptic dislocation of a THA influences synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count and polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%). The primary aim of this study is to investigate the influence of THA dislocation on synovial WBC count and PMN%.MethodsTwenty-eight patients who underwent a synovial aspiration of a THA between 2014 and 2019 were identified and enrolled in our case-control study. Patients with an aseptic THA dislocation and synovial hip aspiration were matched against patients without dislocation, patients undergoing hip aspiration before aseptic THA revision surgery, and patients undergoing hip aspiration before septic THA revision surgery.ResultsSynovial WBC count was significantly increased in the dislocation vs aseptic THA revision group (P = .015), as well as between the septic revision group vs dislocation and aseptic THA revision group (both P < .001). The PMN% did not differ significantly between the dislocation and aseptic revision groups (P = .294). Mean C-reactive protein values were 12.4 ± 14.9 mg/dL in THA dislocation, 24.1 ± 37.7 mg/dL in THA without infection compared to 85.7 ± 84.9 mg/dL in THA infection group (P < .001).ConclusionThis study shows that THA dislocation has a significant impact on synovial WBC count in joint aspiration. Our data suggest that in the setting of THA dislocation, synovial WBC and PMN% may not be the best method to evaluate for PJI. Further research should be performed to establish new thresholds for these synovial inflammatory markers in the setting of THA dislocation and PJI.Level of evidenceLevel III; retrospective trial.