Intrachromosomal mitotic nonallelic homologous recombination is the major molecular mechanism underlying type‐2 NF1 deletions

Nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) is responsible for the recurrent rearrangements that give rise to genomic disorders. Although meiotic NAHR has been investigated in multiple contexts, much less is known about mitotic NAHR despite its importance for tumorigenesis. Because type‐2 NF1 microdeletions frequently result from mitotic NAHR, they represent a good model in which to investigate the features of mitotic NAHR. We have used microsatellite analysis and SNP arrays to distinguish between the various alternative recombinational possibilities, thereby ascertaining that 17 of 18 type‐2 NF1 deletions, with breakpoints in the SUZ12 gene and its highly homologous pseudogene, originated via intrachromosomal recombination. This high proportion of intrachromosomal NAHR causing somatic type‐2 NF1 deletions contrasts with the interchromosomal origin of germline type‐1 NF1 microdeletions, whose breakpoints are located within the NF1‐REPs (low‐copy repeats located adjacent to the SUZ12 sequences). Further, meiotic NAHR causing type‐1 NF1 deletions occurs within recombination hotspots characterized by high GC‐content and DNA duplex stability, whereas the type‐2 breakpoints associated with the mitotic NAHR events investigated here do not cluster within hotspots and are located within regions of significantly lower GC‐content and DNA stability. Our findings therefore point to fundamental mechanistic differences between the determinants of mitotic and meiotic NAHR. Hum Mutat 31:1163–1173, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Characterization of the nonallelic homologous recombination hotspot PRS3 associated with type-3 NF1 deletions

Nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) is the major mechanism underlying recurrent genomic rearrangements, including the large deletions at 17q11.2 that cause neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Here, we identify a novel NAHR hotspot, responsible for type-3 NF1 deletions that span 1.0 Mb. Breakpoint clustering within this 1-kb hotspot, termed PRS3, was noted in 10 of 11 known type-3 NF1 deletions. PRS3 is located within the LRRC37B pseudogene of the NF1-REPb and NF1-REPc low-copy repeats. In contrast to other previously characterized NAHR hotspots, PRS3 has not developed on a preexisting allelic homologous recombination hotspot. Furthermore, the variation pattern of PRS3 and its flanking regions is unusual since only NF1-REPc (and not NF1-REPb) is characterized by a high single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) frequency, suggestive of unidirectional sequence transfer via nonallelic homologous gene conversion (NAHGC). By contrast, the previously described intense NAHR hotspots within the CMT1A-REPs, and the PRS1 and PRS2 hotspots underlying type-1 NF1 deletions, experience frequent bidirectional sequence transfer. PRS3 within NF1-REPc was also found to be involved in NAHGC with the LRRC37B gene, the progenitor locus of the LRRC37B-P duplicons, as indicated by the presence of shared SNPs between these loci. PRS3 therefore represents a weak (and probably evolutionarily rather young) NAHR hotspot with unique properties.     

Identification of recurrent type‐2 NF1 microdeletions reveals a mitotic nonallelic homologous recombination hotspot underlying a human genomic disorder

Nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) is one of the major mechanisms underlying copy number variation in the human genome. Although several disease‐associated meiotic NAHR breakpoints have been analyzed in great detail, hotspots for mitotic NAHR are not well characterized. Type‐2 NF1 microdeletions, which are predominantly of postzygotic origin, constitute a highly informative model with which to investigate the features of mitotic NAHR. Here, a custom‐designed MLPA‐ and PCR‐based approach was used to identify 23 novel NAHR‐mediated type‐2 NF1 deletions. Breakpoint analysis of these 23 type‐2 deletions, together with 17 NAHR‐mediated type‐2 deletions identified previously, revealed that the breakpoints are nonuniformly distributed within the paralogous SUZ12 and SUZ12P sequences. Further, the analysis of this large group of type‐2 deletions revealed breakpoint recurrence within short segments (ranging in size from 57 to 253‐bp) as well as the existence of a novel NAHR hotspot of 1.9‐kb (termed PRS4). This hotspot harbored 20% (8/40) of the type‐2 deletion breakpoints and contains the 253‐bp recurrent breakpoint region BR6 in which four independent type‐2 deletion breakpoints were identified. Our findings indicate that a combination of an open chromatin conformation and short non‐B DNA‐forming repeats may predispose to recurrent mitotic NAHR events between SUZ12 and its pseudogene. Hum Mutat 33:1599–1609, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Extended runs of homozygosity at 17q11.2: an association with type‐2 NF1 deletions?

Large deletions in the NF1 gene region at 17q11.2 are caused by nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR). The recurrent type‐2 NF1 deletions span 1.2 Mb, with breakpoints in the SUZ12 gene and SUZ12P. Type‐2 NF1 deletions occur preferentially during mitosis and are associated with somatic mosaicism. A panel of 16 type‐2 NF1 deletions was used as a model system in which to investigate whether extended homozygosity across 17q11.2 might be associated with somatic deletion. Using SNP arrays, a 3.2 Mb interval encompassing the NF1 deletion region was found to harbor runs of homozygosity (ROHs) in different human populations. However, ROHs ≥500 kb directly flanking the NF1 deletion region on both sides were not found to occur disproportionately in NF1 patients harboring type‐2 deletions compared to controls. Although low allelic diversity in 17q11.2 is unlikely to be a key factor in promoting NAHR‐mediated somatic type‐2 deletions, a specific ROH of 588 kb (roh1), located some 525 kb proximal to the deletion interval, was found to occur more frequently (P=0.012) in the type‐2 deletion patients compared with controls. We postulate that roh1 may act remotely, via an as yet unknown mechanism, to increase the frequency of somatic recombination between the distally duplicated SUZ12 sequences. Hum Mutat 30:1–10, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Identification of Large NF1 Duplications Reciprocal to NAHR‐Mediated Type‐1 NF1 Deletions

Approximately 5% of all patients with neurofibromatosis type‐1 (NF1) exhibit large deletions of the NF1 gene region. To date, only nine unrelated cases of large NF1 duplications have been reported, with none of the affected patients exhibiting multiple café au lait spots (CALS), Lisch nodules, freckling, or neurofibromas, the hallmark signs of NF1. Here, we have characterized two novel NF1 duplications, one sporadic and one familial. Both index patients with NF1 duplications exhibited learning disabilities and atypical CALS. Additionally, patient R609021 had Lisch nodules, whereas patient R653070 exhibited two inguinal freckles. The mother and sister of patient R609021 also harbored the NF1 duplication and exhibited cognitive dysfunction but no CALS. The breakpoints of the nine NF1 duplications reported previously have not been identified and hence their underlying generative mechanisms have remained unclear. In this study, we performed high‐resolution breakpoint analysis that indicated that the two duplications studied were mediated by nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) and that the duplication breakpoints were located within the NAHR hotspot paralogous recombination site 2 (PRS2), which also harbors the type‐1 NF1 deletion breakpoints. Hence, our study indicates for the first time that NF1 duplications are reciprocal to type‐1 NF1 deletions and originate from the same NAHR events.     

NF1 microdeletions in neurofibromatosis type 1: from genotype to phenotype

In 5‐10% of patients, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) results from microdeletions that encompass the entire NF1 gene and a variable number of flanking genes. Two recurrent microdeletion types are found in most cases, with microdeletion breakpoints located in paralogous regions flanking NF1 (proximal NF1‐REP‐a and distal NF1‐REP–c for the 1.4 Mb type‐1 microdeletion, and SUZ12 and SUZ12P for the 1.2 Mb type‐2 microdeletion). A more severe phenotype is usually associated with NF1 microdeletion patients than in those with intragenic mutations. We characterized NF1 microdeletions in 70 unrelated NF1 microdeleted patients using a high‐resolution NF1 custom array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Genotype‐phenotype correlations were studied in 58 of these microdeletion patients and compared to 389 patients with intragenic truncating NF1 mutations and phenotyped in the same standardized way. Our results confirmed in an unbiased manner the existence of a contiguous gene syndrome with a significantly higher incidence of learning disabilities and facial dysmorphism in microdeleted patients compared to patients with intragenic NF1 mutations. Microdeleted NF1 patients also showed a trend toward significance for childhood overgrowth. High‐resolution array‐CGH identified a new recurrent ～1.0 Mb microdeletion type, designated as type‐3, with breakpoints in the paralogous regions middle NF1‐REP‐b and distal NF1‐REP–c. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Alu-related 5q35 microdeletions in Sotos syndrome

Haploinsufficiency of the NSD1 gene due to 5q35 microdeletions or intragenic mutations causes Sotos syndrome (SoS). In 46 of the 49 Japanese deletion cases, common deletion breakpoints were located at two flanking low copy repeats (LCRs), implying that non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) between LCRs is the major mechanism for the common deletion. In the other three cases of atypical deletions, the mechanism(s) of deletions remains unanswered. We characterized the atypical microdeletions using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and Southern blot hybridization. All the deletion breakpoints in the three cases were successfully determined at the nucleotide level. Two deletions are 1.07 Mb (SoS19) and 1.23 Mb (SoS109) in size, and another consisted of two deletions with sizes of 28 kb and 0.72 Mb, intervened by an intact 29-kb segment (SoS44). All deletions were smaller than a typical 1.9-Mb common deletion. Alu elements were identified in both deletion breakpoints in SoS19, one of deletion breakpoints in SoS109, and both deletion breakpoints of the proximal 28-kb deletion in SoS44. Alu-mediated NAHR is strongly suggested at least in two of atypical deletions. Finally, qPCR is a very useful method to determine deletion breakpoints even in repeat-related regions.     

Structures and molecular mechanisms for common 15q13.3 microduplications involving CHRNA7: benign or pathological?

We have investigated four ～1.6‐Mb microduplications and 55 smaller 350–680‐kb microduplications at 15q13.2–q13.3 involving the CHRNA7 gene that were detected by clinical microarray analysis. Applying high‐resolution array‐CGH, we mapped all 118 chromosomal breakpoints of these microduplications. We also sequenced 26 small microduplication breakpoints that were clustering at hotspots of nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR). All four large microduplications likely arose by NAHR between BP4 and BP5 LCRs, and 54 small microduplications arose by NAHR between two CHRNA7‐LCR copies. We identified two classes of ～1.6‐Mb microduplications and five classes of small microduplications differing in duplication size, and show that they duplicate the entire CHRNA7. We propose that size differences among small microduplications result from preexisting heterogeneity of the common BP4–BP5 inversion. Clinical data and family histories of 11 patients with small microduplications involving CHRNA7 suggest that these microduplications might be associated with developmental delay/mental retardation, muscular hypotonia, and a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders. However, we conclude that these microduplications and their associated potential for increased dosage of the CHRNA7‐encoded α7 subunit of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are of uncertain clinical significance at present. Nevertheless, if they prove to have a pathological effects, their high frequency could make them a common risk factor for many neurobehavioral disorders. Hum Mutat 31:1–11, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Palindrome‐Mediated and Replication‐Dependent Pathogenic Structural Rearrangements within the NF1 Gene

Palindromic sequences can form hairpin structures or cruciform extrusions, which render them susceptible to genomic rearrangements. A 197‐bp long palindromic AT‐rich repeat (PATRR17) is located within intron 40 of the neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene (17q11.2). Through comprehensive NF1 analysis, we identified six unrelated patients with a rearrangement involving intron 40 (five deletions and one reciprocal translocation t(14;17)(q32;q11.2)). We hypothesized that PATRR17 may be involved in these rearrangements thereby causing NF1. Breakpoint cloning revealed that PATRR17 was indeed involved in all of the rearrangements. As microhomology was present at all breakpoint junctions of the deletions identified, and PATRR17 partner breakpoints were located within 7.1 kb upstream of PATRR17, fork stalling and template switching/microhomology‐mediated break‐induced replication was the most likely rearrangement mechanism. For the reciprocal translocation case, a 51 bp insertion at the translocation breakpoints mapped to a short sequence within PATRR17, proximal to the breakpoint, suggesting a multiple stalling and rereplication process, in contrast to previous studies indicating a purely replication‐independent mechanism for PATRR‐mediated translocations. In conclusion, we show evidence that PATRR17 is a hotspot for pathogenic intragenic deletions within the NF1 gene and suggest a novel replication‐dependent mechanism for PATRR‐mediated translocation.     

Consideration of the haplotype diversity at nonallelic homologous recombination hotspots improves the precision of rearrangement breakpoint identification

Precise characterization of nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) breakpoints is key to identifying those features that influence NAHR frequency. Until now, analysis of NAHR‐mediated rearrangements has generally been performed by comparison of the breakpoint‐spanning sequences with the human genome reference sequence. We show here that the haplotype diversity of NAHR hotspots may interfere with breakpoint‐mapping. We studied the transmitting parents of individuals with germline type‐1 NF1 deletions mediated by NAHR within the paralogous recombination site 1 (PRS1) or paralogous recombination site 2 (PRS2) hotspots. Several parental wild‐type PRS1 and PRS2 haplotypes were identified that exhibited considerable sequence differences with respect to the reference sequence, which also affected the number of predicted PRDM9‐binding sites. Sequence comparisons between the parental wild‐type PRS1 or PRS2 haplotypes and the deletion breakpoint‐spanning sequences from the patients (method #2) turned out to be an accurate means to assign NF1 deletion breakpoints and proved superior to crude reference sequence comparisons that neglect to consider haplotype diversity (method #1). The mean length of the deletion breakpoint regions assigned by method #2 was 269‐bp in contrast to 502‐bp by method #1. Our findings imply that paralog‐specific haplotype diversity of NAHR hotspots (such as PRS2) and population‐specific haplotype diversity must be taken into account in order to accurately ascertain NAHR‐mediated rearrangement breakpoints.     

Analysis of Crossover Breakpoints Yields New Insights into the Nature of the Gene Conversion Events Associated with Large NF1 Deletions Mediated by Nonallelic Homologous Recombination

Large NF1 deletions are mediated by nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR). An in‐depth analysis of gene conversion operating in the breakpoint‐flanking regions of large NF1 deletions was performed to investigate whether the rate of discontinuous gene conversion during NAHR with crossover is increased, as has been previously noted in NAHR‐mediated rearrangements. All 20 germline type‐1 NF1 deletions analyzed were mediated by NAHR associated with continuous gene conversion within the breakpoint‐flanking regions. Continuous gene conversion was also observed in 31/32 type‐2 NF1 deletions investigated. In contrast to the meiotic type‐1 NF1 deletions, type‐2 NF1 deletions are predominantly of post‐zygotic origin. Our findings therefore imply that the mitotic as well as the meiotic NAHR intermediates of large NF1 deletions are processed by long‐patch mismatch repair (MMR), thereby ensuring gene conversion tract continuity instead of the discontinuous gene conversion that is characteristic of short‐patch repair. However, the single type‐2 NF1 deletion not exhibiting continuous gene conversion was processed without MMR, yielding two different deletion‐bearing chromosomes, which were distinguishable in terms of their breakpoint positions. Our findings indicate that MMR failure during NAHR, followed by post‐meiotic/mitotic segregation, has the potential to give rise to somatic mosaicism in human genomic rearrangements by generating breakpoint heterogeneity.     

NF1 microdeletion breakpoints are clustered at flanking repetitive sequences

Neurofibromatosis type 1 patients with a submicroscopic deletion spanning the NF1 tumor suppressor gene are remarkable for an early age at onset of cutaneous neurofibromas, suggesting the deletion of an additional locus that potentiates neurofibromagenesis. Construction of a 3.5 Mb BAC/PAC/YAC contig at chromosome 17q11.2 and analysis of somatic cell hybrids from microdeletion patients showed that 14 of 17 cases had deletions of 1.5 Mb in length. The deletions encompassed the entire 350 kb NF1 gene, three additional genes, one pseudogene and 16 expressed sequence tags (ESTs). In these cases, both proximal and distal breakpoints mapped at chromosomal regions of high identity, termed NF1REPs. These REPs, or clusters of paralogous loci, are 15-100 kb and harbor at least four ESTs and an expressed SH3GL pseudogene. The remaining three patients had at least one breakpoint outside an NF1REP element; one had a smaller deletion thereby narrowing the critical region harboring the putative locus that exacerbates neurofibroma development to 1 Mb. These data show that the likely mechanism of NF1 microdeletion is homologous recombination between NF1REPs on sister chromatids. NF1 microdeletion is the first REP-mediated rearrangement identified that results in loss of a tumor suppressor gene. Therefore, in addition to the germline rearrangements reported here, NF1REP-mediated somatic recombination could be an important mechanism for the loss of heterozygosity at NF1 in tumors of NF1 patients.     

Recurrent HERV‐H‐Mediated 3q13.2–q13.31 Deletions Cause a Syndrome of Hypotonia and Motor,Language, and Cognitive Delays

We describe the molecular and clinical characterization of nine individuals with recurrent, 3.4‐Mb, de novo deletions of 3q13.2–q13.31 detected by chromosomal microarray analysis. All individuals have hypotonia and language and motor delays; they variably express mild to moderate cognitive delays (8/9), abnormal behavior (7/9), and autism spectrum disorders (3/9). Common facial features include downslanting palpebral fissures with epicanthal folds, a slightly bulbous nose, and relative macrocephaly. Twenty‐eight genes map to the deleted region, including four strong candidate genes, DRD3, ZBTB20, GAP43, and BOC, with important roles in neural and/or muscular development. Analysis of the breakpoint regions based on array data revealed directly oriented human endogenous retrovirus (HERV‐H) elements of ～5 kb in size and of >95% DNA sequence identity flanking the deletion. Subsequent DNA sequencing revealed different deletion breakpoints and suggested nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) between HERV‐H elements as a mechanism of deletion formation, analogous to HERV‐I‐flanked and NAHR‐mediated AZFa deletions. We propose that similar HERV elements may also mediate other recurrent deletion and duplication events on a genome‐wide scale. Observation of rare recurrent chromosomal events such as these deletions helps to further the understanding of mechanisms behind naturally occurring variation in the human genome and its contribution to genetic disease.     

The Contribution of Whole Gene Deletions and Large Rearrangements to the Mutation Spectrum in Inherited Tumor Predisposing Syndromes

Heterozygous whole gene deletions (WGDs), and intragenic microdeletions, account for a significant proportion of mutations underlying cancer predisposition syndromes. We analyzed the frequency and genotype–phenotype correlations of microdeletions in 12 genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, PMS2, NF1, NF2, APC, PTCH1, and VHL) representing seven tumor predisposition syndromes in 5,897 individuals (2,611 families) from our center. Overall, microdeletions accounted for 14% of identified mutations. As expected, smaller deletions or duplications were more common (12%) than WGDs (2.2%). Where a WGD was identified in the germline in NF2, the mechanism of somatic second hit was not deletion, as previously described for NF1. For neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2, we compared the mechanism of germline deletion. Unlike NF1, where three specific deletion sizes account for most germline WGDs, NF2 deletion breakpoints were different across seven samples tested. One of these deletions was 3.93 Mb and conferred a severe phenotype, thus refining the region for a potential NF2 modifier gene to a 2.04‐Mb region on chromosome 22. The milder phenotype of NF2 WGDs may be due to the apparent absence of chromosome 22 loss as the second hit. These observations of WGD phenotypes will be helpful for interpreting incidental findings from microarray analysis and next‐generation sequencing.     

A previously unrecognized microdeletion syndrome on chromosome 22 band q11.2 encompassing the BCR gene

Susceptibility of the chromosome 22q11.2 region to rearrangements has been recognized on the basis of common clinical disorders such as the DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome (DG/VCFs). Recent evidence has implicated low-copy repeats (LCRs); also known as segmental duplications; on 22q as mediators of nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) that result in rearrangements of 22q11.2. It has been shown that both deletion and duplication events can occur as a result of NAHR caused by unequal crossover of LCRs. Here we report on the clinical, cytogenetic and array CGH studies of a 15-year-old Hispanic boy with history of learning and behavior problems. We suggest that he represents a previously unrecognized microdeletion syndrome on chromosome 22 band q11.2 just telomeric to the DG/VCFs typically deleted region and encompassing the BCR gene. Using a 32K BAC array CGH chip we were able to refine and precisely narrow the breakpoints of this microdeletion, which was estimated to be 1.55-1.92 Mb in size and to span approximately 20 genes. This microdeletion region is flanked by LCR clusters containing several modules with a very high degree of sequence homology (>95%), and therefore could play a causal role in its origin.     

New chromosomal syndromes

Mental retardation occurs in 2-3% of the general population either in isolation or in combination with facial dysmorphism and/or malformations. Chromosomal abnormalities are a most common etiology. Karyotype displays chromosome aberrations in about 10% of patients but it has a limited resolution (5 Mb). Recently, the development of new molecular cytogenetic tools, especially array CGH, allowed to detect smaller abnormalities and increased the diagnosis capability of 15-20%. Among these newly detected rearrangements, some of them are recurrent and define new recognized syndromes. We will first briefly explain the non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) mechanism that underlines the origin of recurrent microdeletions and microduplications. Then we will describe eight new syndromes, four microdeletions (del 17q21.31, del 3q29, del 15q24, del 2q32.3q33) and four microduplications (dup 22q11.2, dup 7q11.23, dup 17p11.2, duplication of MECP2). A better knowledge of these new recurrent chromosomal syndromes will allow to improve care for patients, to develop targeted chromosomal diagnosis and to identify genes involved in neurocognitive functions.     

Absence of cutaneous neurofibromas in an NF1 patient with an atypical deletion partially overlapping the common 1.4 Mb microdeleted region

The majority of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) microdeletions in 17q11.2 span approximately 1.4 Mb and have breakpoints that lie within the proximal and distal NF1-low copy repeats, termed NF1-REPs. Less frequent are patients with atypical deletions and non-recurring breakpoints. NF1 patients with gross deletions have been reported to manifest a more severe clinical phenotype than NF1 patients with intragenic mutations, and display early onset and extensive growth of neurofibromas. It has been suggested that the deletion of a neighboring gene or genes in addition to the NF1 gene may modify the expression of the disease, particularly with regard to the high burden of cutaneous neurofibromas. Thus, atypical deletions partially overlapping with the common 1.4 Mb microdeletion interval could prove useful in identifying possible genetic modifiers in the NF1 gene region whose haploinsufficiency might promote neurofibroma growth. Here we report a 20-year-old female who has an atypical deletion with a proximal breakpoint in NF1 intron 21 and a distal deletion breakpoint in the ACCN1 gene. The deletion spans 2.7 Mb and was mediated by an intrachromosomal non-homology-driven mechanism, for example, non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). Remarkably, this patient did not exhibit cutaneous neurofibromas. However, genotype-phenotype comparisons in this and other previously reported patients with atypical deletions partially overlapping the commonly deleted 1.4 Mb interval do not identify a specific deleted region that is associated with increased neurofibroma growth.     

Fifty microdeletions among 112 cases of Sotos syndrome: low copy repeats possibly mediate the common deletion

Sotos syndrome (SoS) is an autosomal dominant overgrowth syndrome with characteristic craniofacial dysmorphic features and various degrees of mental retardation. We previously showed that haploinsufficiency of the NSD1 gene is the major cause of SoS, and submicroscopic deletions at 5q35, including NSD1, were found in about a half (20/42) of our patients examined. Since the first report, an additional 70 SoS cases consisting of 53 Japanese and 17 non-Japanese have been analyzed. We found 50 microdeletions (45%) and 16 point mutations (14%) among all the 112 cases. A large difference in the frequency of microdeletions between Japanese and non-Japanese patients was noted: 49 (52%) of the 95 Japanese patients and only one (6%) of the 17 non-Japanese had microdeletions. A sequence-based physical map was constructed to characterize the microdeletions. Most of the microdeletions were confirmed to be identical by FISH analysis. We identified highly homologous sequences, i.e., possible low copy repeats (LCRs), in regions flanking proximal and distal breakpoints of the common deletion, This suggests that LCRs may mediate the deletion. Such LCRs seem to be present in different populations. Thus the different frequency of microdeletions between Japanese and non-Japanese cases in our study may have been caused by patient-selection bias.     

A novel translocation t(10;17)(p13;q11.2) harboring two cryptic deletions identified by array‐CGH and characterized by SUZ12 overexpression in a patient with chronic thrombocytosis

No specific translocation is associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). However, an interstitial deletion involving subband 17q11.2 which includes the NF1 gene, although rare, is a recurrent aberration in several myeloid disorders including MPNs. For the first time, we report an acquired novel translocation involving 10p13 and 17q11.2 in a 62‐year‐old Caucasian female which was referred for investigation of chronic and persistent unexplained thrombocytosis. The patient had no history of hematological sequelae and genomic testing for JAK2, CALR, and MPL mutations were negative. She was subsequently diagnosed with a triple negative essential thrombocythemia. Array‐CGH analysis noted that the translocation harbored two cryptic deletions, one of which involved 17q11.2 encompassing the NF1 gene. One of the junction breakpoints involved the SUZ12 gene. Immunohistochemical assessment of the marrow trephine showed increased megakaryocytic expression of the SUZ12 protein, as well as EZH2 and Ki67; biochemical abnormalities suggestive of excess megakaryocytic hyperplasia. This novel translocation may affect the expression of SUZ12 and its downstream targets, and may represent a unique pathogenomic etiology which drives chronic thrombocytosis in essential thrombocythemia.     

Dissecting loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in neurofibromatosis type 1-associated neurofibromas: Importance of copy neutral LOH

Dermal neurofibromas (dNFs) are benign tumors of the peripheral nervous system typically associated with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients. Genes controlling the integrity of the DNA are likely to influence the number of neurofibromas developed because dNFs are caused by somatic mutational inactivation of the NF1 gene, frequently evidenced by loss of heterozygosity (LOH). We performed a comprehensive analysis of the prevalence and mechanisms of LOH in dNFs. Our study included 518 dNFs from 113 patients. LOH was detected in 25% of the dNFs (N = 129). The most frequent mechanism causing LOH was mitotic recombination, which was observed in 62% of LOH‐tumors (N = 80), and which does not reduce the number of NF1 gene copies. All events were generated by a single crossover located between the centromere and the NF1 gene, resulting in isodisomy of 17q. LOH due to the loss of the NF1 gene accounted for a 38% of dNFs with LOH (N = 49), with deletions ranging in size from ～80 kb to ～8 Mb within 17q. In one tumor we identified the first example of a neurofibroma‐associated second‐hit type‐2 NF1 deletion. Analysis of the prevalence of mechanisms causing LOH in dNFs in individual patients (possibly under genetic control) will elucidate whether there exist interindividual variation. Hum Mutat 32:78–90, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.