共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Minji K. Lee Kathleen J. Yost Jennifer S. McDonald Ryne W. Dougherty Roanna L. Vine David F. Kallmes 《The spine journal》2017,17(6):821-829
Background Context
The majority of validation done on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) has been in patients with mild or moderate disability. There is paucity of research focusing on the psychometric quality of the RMDQ in patients with severe disability.Purpose
To evaluate the psychometric quality of the RMDQ in patients with severe disability.Study Design/Setting
Observational clinical study.Sample
The sample consisted of 214 patients with painful vertebral compression fractures who underwent vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.Outcome Measures
The 23-item version of the RMDQ was completed at two time points: baseline and 30-day postintervention follow-up.Methods
With the two-parameter logistic unidimensional item response theory (IRT) analyses, we derived the range of scores that produced reliable measurement and investigated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).Results
Scores for 214 (100%) patients at baseline and 108 (50%) patients at follow-up did not meet the reliability criterion of 0.90 or higher, with the majority of patients having disability due to back pain that was too severe to be reliably measured by the RMDQ. Depending on methodology, MCID estimates ranged from 2 to 8 points and the proportion of patients classified as having experienced meaningful improvement ranged from 26% to 68%. A greater change in score was needed at the extreme ends of the score scale to be classified as having achieved MCID using IRT methods.Conclusions
Replacing items measuring moderate disability with items measuring severe disability could yield a version of the RMDQ that better targets patients with severe disability due to back pain. Improved precision in measuring disability would be valuable to clinicians who treat patients with greater functional impairments. Caution is needed when choosing criteria for interpreting meaningful change using the RMDQ. 相似文献2.
Ronald H.M.A. Bartels Roland D. Donk Wim I.M. Verhagen Allard J.F. Hosman André L.M. Verbeek 《The spine journal》2017,17(11):1625-1632
Background Context
The results of meta-analyses are frequently reported, but understanding and interpreting them is difficult for both clinicians and patients. Statistical significances are presented without referring to values that imply clinical relevance.Purpose
This study aimed to use the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) to rate the clinical relevance of a meta-analysis.Study Design
This study is a review of the literature.Patient Sample
This study is a review of meta-analyses relating to a specific topic, clinical results of cervical arthroplasty.Outcome Measure
The outcome measure used in the study was the MCID.Methods
We performed an extensive literature search of a series of meta-analyses evaluating a similar subject as an example. We searched in Pubmed and Embase through August 9, 2016, and found articles concerning meta-analyses of the clinical outcome of cervical arthroplasty compared with that of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in cases of cervical degenerative disease. We evaluated the analyses for statistical significance and their relation to MCID. MCID was defined based on results in similar patient groups and a similar disease entity reported in the literature.Results
We identified 21 meta-analyses, only one of which referred to MCID. However, the researchers used an inappropriate measurement scale and, therefore, an incorrect MCID. The majority of the conclusions were based on statistical results without mentioning clinical relevance.Conclusions
The majority of the articles we reviewed drew conclusions based on statistical differences instead of clinical relevance. We recommend introducing the concept of MCID while reporting the results of a meta-analysis, as well as mentioning the explicit scale of the analyzed measurement. 相似文献3.
Vincent J. Alentado Stephanie Caldwell Heath P. Gould Michael P. Steinmetz Edward C. Benzel Thomas E. Mroz 《The spine journal》2017,17(2):236-243
Background Context
Multiple studies have determined minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds for EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) scores in lumbar fusion patients. However, a comprehensive understanding of predictors for a clinically significant improvement (CSI) postoperatively does not exist.Purpose
To determine medical, radiographic, and surgical predictors for obtaining a CSI following lumbar fusion surgery.Study Design
This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent instrumented lumbar fusion.Patient Sample
We included patients who underwent lumbar fusion for any indication between 2008 and 2013.Outcome Measures
Outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative EQ-5D Index scores.Materials and Methods
The medical records of patients who received a lumbar fusion for any indication were retrospectively reviewed to identify patient medical and surgical characteristics. A blinded reviewer assessed radiographs for each patient to examine sagittal alignment following fusion. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the achievement of a CSI based on two commonly cited MCID values.Results
A total of 231 patients fit the inclusion criteria; 58% exceeded an MCID value for an EQ-5D score of 0.100, and 16% exceeded an MCID value of 0.390. Statistically significant independent predictors of not obtaining a CSI for an MCID threshold of 0.100 included a higher preoperative EQ-5D score (odds ratio [OR]=44.8) and L5-S1 fusion (OR=3.3). For an MCID value of 0.390, a higher preoperative EQ-5D score (OR=2,080.8) and a diagnosis of depression (OR=7.1) were predictive of not achieving a CSI, whereas spondylolisthesis (OR=4.1) was predictive of obtaining a CSI postoperatively. For both MCID values, patients who achieved a CSI had better postoperative quality of life (QOL) scores for all metrics measured, despite worse QOL scores preoperatively.Conclusions
This study is the first to use a combination of medical, surgical, and postoperative sagittal balance variables as determinants for the achievement of a CSI after lumbar fusion. The awareness of these predictors may allow for better patient selection and surgical approach to decrease the probability of acquiring a poor outcome postoperatively. 相似文献4.
Andrew J. Hahne Jon J. Ford Rana S. Hinman Matthew C. Richards Luke D. Surkitt Alexander Y.P. Chan Sarah L. Slater Nicholas F. Taylor 《The spine journal》2017,17(3):346-359
Background Context
Physical therapy is commonly sought by people with lumbar disc herniation and associated radiculopathy. It is unclear whether physical therapy is effective for this population.Purpose
To determine the effectiveness of physical therapist-delivered individualized functional restoration as an adjunct to guideline-based advice in people with lumbar disc herniation and associated radiculopathy.Study Design
This is a preplanned subgroup analysis of a multicenter parallel group randomized controlled trial.Patient Sample
The study included 54 participants with clinical features of radiculopathy (6-week to 6-month duration) and imaging showing a lumbar disc herniation.Outcome Measures
Primary outcomes were activity limitation (Oswestry Disability Index) and separate 0–10 numerical pain rating scales for leg pain and back pain. Measures were taken at baseline and at 5, 10, 26, and 52 weeks.Methods
The participants were randomly allocated to receive either individualized functional restoration incorporating advice (10 sessions) or guideline-based advice alone (2 sessions) over a 10-week period. Treatment was administered by 11 physical therapists at private clinics in Melbourne, Australia.Results
Between-group differences for activity limitation favored the addition of individualized functional restoration to advice alone at 10 weeks (7.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3–15.1) and 52 weeks (8.2, 95% CI 0.7–15.6), as well as back pain at 10 weeks (1.4, 95% CI 0.2–2.7). There were no significant differences between groups for leg pain at any follow-up. Several secondary outcomes also favored individualized functional restoration over advice.Conclusions
In participants with lumbar disc herniation and associated radiculopathy, an individualized functional restoration program incorporating advice led to greater reduction in activity limitation at 10- and 52-week follow-ups compared with guideline-based advice alone. Although back pain was significantly reduced at 10 weeks with individualized functional restoration, this effect was not maintained at later timepoints, and there were no significant effects on leg pain, relative to guideline-based advice. 相似文献5.
Background Content
Lumbar axial back pain arising from degenerative disc disease continues to be a challenging clinical problem whether treated with nonsurgical management, local injection, or motion segment stabilization and fusion.Purpose
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of intraosseous basivertebral nerve (BVN) ablation for the treatment of chronic lumbar back pain in a clinical setting.Study Design
Patients meeting predefined inclusion or exclusion criteria were enrolled in a study using radiofrequency energy to ablate the BVN within the vertebral bodies adjacent to the diagnosed level. Patients were evaluated at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.Patient Sample
Seventeen patients with chronic, greater than 6 months, low back pain unresponsive to at least 3 months of conservative care were enrolled. Sixteen patients were treated successfully following screening using magnetic resonance imaging finding of Modic type I or II changes and positive confirmatory discography to determine the affected levels. The treated population consisted of eight male and eight female patients; the mean age was 48 years (34–66 years).Outcome Measures
Self-reported outcome measures were collected prospectively at each follow-up interval. Measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale score, and Medical Outcomes Trust 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).Materials and Methods
This is an industry-sponsored study to evaluate the effectiveness of intraosseous nerves in the treatment of chronic back pain. Consented and enrolled patients underwent ablation of the BVN using radiofrequency energy (INTRACEPT System, Relievant Medsystems, Inc, Redwood City, CA, USA) guided in a transpedicular or extrapedicular approach. Preoperative planning determined targeted ablation zone and safety zones.Results
Mean baseline ODI of the treated cohort was 52±13, decreasing to a mean of 23±21 at 3 months follow-up (p<.001). The statistically significant improvement in ODI observed at 3 months was maintained through the 12-month follow-up. The mean baseline visual analogue scale score decreased from 61±22 to 45±35 at 3 months follow-up (p<.05), and the mean baseline physical component summary increased from 34.5±6.5 to 41.7±12.4 at 3 months follow-up (p=.03).Conclusion
Ablation of the BVN for the treatment of chronic lumbar back pain significantly improves patients' self-reported outcome early in the follow-up period; the improvement persisted throughout the 1-year study period. 相似文献6.
Deven A. Karvelas Sean D. Rundell Janna L. Friedly Alfred C. Gellhorn Laura S. Gold Bryan A. Comstock Patrick J. Heagerty Brian W. Bresnahan David R. Nerenz Jeffrey G. Jarvik 《The spine journal》2017,17(3):380-389
Background
The association between early physical therapy (PT) and subsequent health-care utilization following a new visit for low back pain is not clear, particularly in the setting of acute low back pain.Purpose
This study aimed to estimate the association between initiating early PT following a new visit for an episode of low back pain and subsequent back pain–specific health-care utilization in older adults.Design/Setting
This is a prospective cohort study. Data were collected at three integrated health-care systems in the United States through the Back Pain Outcomes using Longitudinal Data (BOLD) registry.Patient Sample
We recruited 4,723 adults, aged 65 and older, presenting to a primary care setting with a new episode of low back pain.Outcome Measures
Primary outcome was total back pain–specific relative value units (RVUs), from days 29 to 365. Secondary outcomes included overall RVUs for all health care and use of specific health-care services including imaging (x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or computed tomography [CT]), emergency department visits, physician visits, PT, spinal injections, spinal surgeries, and opioid use.Methods
We compared patients who had early PT (initiated within 28 days of the index visit) with those not initiating early PT using appropriate, generalized linear models to adjust for potential confounding variables.Results
Adjusted analysis found no statistically significant difference in total spine RVUs between the two groups (ratio of means 1.19, 95% CI of 0.72–1.96, p=.49). For secondary outcomes, only the difference between total spine imaging RVUs and total PT RVUs was statistically significant. The early PT group had greater PT RVUs; the ratio of means was 2.56 (95% CI of 2.17–3.03, p<.001). The early PT group had greater imaging RVUs; the ratio of means was 1.37 (95% CI of 1.09–1.71, p=.01.)Conclusions
We found that in a group of older adults presenting for a new episode of low back pain, the use of early PT is not associated with any statistically significant difference in subsequent back pain–specific health-care utilization compared with patients not receiving early PT. 相似文献7.
Dustin B. Wygant Paul A. Arbisi Kevin J. Bianchini Robert L. Umlauf 《The spine journal》2017,17(4):505-510
Background Context
Waddell et al. identified a set of eight non-organic signs in 1980. There has been controversy about their meaning, particularly with respect to their use as validity indicators.Purpose
The current study examined the Waddell signs in relation to measures of somatic amplification or over-reporting in a sample of outpatient chronic pain patients. We examined the degree to which these signs were associated with measures of over-reporting.Study Design/Setting
This study examined scores on the Waddell signs in relation to over-reporting indicators in an outpatient chronic pain sample.Patient Sample
We examined 230 chronic pain patients treated at a multidisciplinary pain clinic. The majority of these patients presented with primary back or spinal injuries.Outcome Measures
The outcome measures used in the study were Waddell signs, Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form.Methods
We examined Waddell signs using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and analysis of variance (ANOVA), receiver operating characteristic analysis, classification accuracy, and relative risk ratios.Results
Multivariate analysis of variance and ANOVA showed a significant association between Waddell signs and somatic amplification. Classification analyses showed increased odds of somatic amplification at a Waddell score of 2 or 3.Conclusions
Our results found significant evidence of an association between Waddell signs and somatic over-reporting. Elevated scores on the Waddell signs (particularly scores higher than 2 and 3) were associated with increased odds of exhibiting somatic over-reporting. 相似文献8.
9.
Xin Rong Beiyu Wang Chen Ding Yuxiao Deng Hua Chen Yang Meng Weijie Yan Hao Liu 《The spine journal》2017,17(12):1926-1931
Background Context
Facet tropism is defined as the angular difference between the left and the right facet orientation. Facet tropism was suggested to be associated with the disc degeneration and facet degeneration in the lumbar spine. However, little is known about the relationship between facet tropism and pathologic changes in the cervical spine and the mechanism behind.Purpose
This study was conducted to investigate the biomechanical impact of facet tropism on the intervertebral disc and facet joints.Study Design
A finite element analysis study.Methods
The computed tomography (CT) scans of a 28-year-old male volunteer was used to construct the finite element model. First, a symmetrical cervical model from C2 to C7 was constructed. The facet orientations at each level were simulated using the data from our previously published study. Second, the facet orientations at the C5–C6 level were altered to simulate facet tropism with respect to the sagittal plane. The angular difference of the moderate facet tropism model was set to be 7 degrees, whereas the severe facet tropism model was set to be 14 degrees. The inferior of the C7 vertebra was fixed. A 75 N follower loading was applied to simulate the weight of the head. A 1.0 N?m moments was applied on the odontoid process of the C2 to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.Results
The intradiscal pressure (IDP) at the C5–C6 level of the severe facet tropism model increased by 49.02%, 57.14%, 39.06%, and 30.67%, under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation moments, in comparison with the symmetrical model. The contact force of the severe facet tropism model increased by 35.64%, 31.74%, 79.26%, and 59.47% from the symmetrical model under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively.Conclusions
Facet tropism with respect to the sagittal plane at the C5–C6 level increased the IDP and facet contact force under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The results suggested that facet tropism might be the anatomic risk factor of the development of cervical disc degeneration or facet degeneration. Future clinical studies are in need to verify the biomechanical impact of facet tropism on the development of degenerative changes in the cervical spine. 相似文献10.
Xiaofei Cheng Kai Zhang Xiaojiang Sun Changqing Zhao Hua Li Bin Ni Jie Zhao 《The spine journal》2017,17(8):1127-1133
Background Context
Laminectomy with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) has been shown to achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes, but it leads to potential adverse consequences associated with extensive disruption of posterior bony and soft tissue structures.Purpose
This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach (BDUA) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and laminectomy with PLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) with stenosis.Study Design
This is a prospective cohort study.Patient Sample
This study compared 43 patients undergoing BDUA+TLIF and 40 patients undergoing laminectomy+PLIF.Outcome Measures
Visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) score.Methods
The clinical outcomes were assessed, and intraoperative data and complications were collected. Radiographic outcomes included slippage of the vertebra, disc space height, segmental lordosis, and final fusion rate. This study was supported by a grant from The National Natural Science Foundation of China (81572168).Results
There were significant improvements in clinical and radiographic outcomes from before surgery to 3 months and 2 years after surgery within each group. Analysis of leg pain VAS and ZCQ scores showed no significant differences in improvement between groups at either follow-up. The mean improvements in low back pain VAS and ODI scores were significantly greater in the BDUA+TLIF group than in the laminectomy+PLIF group. No significant difference was found in the final fusion rate at 2-year follow-up. The BDUA+TLIF group had significantly less blood loss, shorter length of postoperative hospital stay, and lower complication rate compared with the laminectomy+PLIF group.Conclusions
When compared with the conventional laminectomy+PLIF procedure, the BDUA+TLIF procedure achieves similar and satisfactory effects of decompression and fusion for DLS with stenosis. The BDUA+TLIF procedure appears to be associated with less postoperative low back discomfort and quicker recovery. 相似文献11.
Jan Triebel Greta Snellman Bengt Sandén Fredrik Strömqvist Yohan Robinson 《The spine journal》2017,17(5):656-662
Background Context
Proper patient selection is of utmost importance in the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Among other factors, gender was previously found to influence lumbar fusion surgery outcome.Purpose
This study investigates whether gender affects clinical outcome after lumbar fusion.Study Design
This is a national registry cohort study.Patient sample
Between 2001 and 2011, 2,251 men and 2,521 women were followed prospectively within the Swedish National Spine Register (SWESPINE) after lumbar fusion surgery for DDD and CLBP.Outcome measures
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), quality of life (QoL) parameter EQ5D, and labor status and pain medication were collected preoperatively, 1 and 2 years after surgery.Methods
Gender differences of baseline data and PROM improvement from baseline were analyzed. The effect of gender on clinically important improvement of PROM was determined in a multivariate logistic regression model. Furthermore, gender-related differences in return-to-work were investigated.Results
Preoperatively, women had worse leg pain (p<.001), back pain (p=.002), lower QoL (p<.001), and greater disability than men (p=.001). Postoperatively, women presented greater improvement 2 years from baseline for pain, function, and QoL (all p<.01). Women had better chances of a clinically important improvement than men for leg pain (odds ratio [OR]=1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19–1.61, p<.01) and back pain (OR=1.20,95% CI:1.03–1.40, p=.02) as well as ODI (OR=1.24, 95% CI:1.05–1.47, p=.01), but improved at a slower pace in leg pain (p<.001), back pain (p=.009), and disability (p=.008). No gender differences were found in QoL and return to work at 2 years postoperatively.Conclusions
Swedish women do not have worse results than men after spinal fusion surgery. Female patients present with worse pain and function preoperatively, but improve more than men do after surgery. 相似文献12.
Ho-Joong Kim Kyoung-Tak Kang Sung-Cheol Park Oh-Hyo Kwon Juhyun Son Bong-Soon Chang Choon-Ki Lee Jin S. Yeom Lawrence G. Lenke 《The spine journal》2017,17(5):671-680
Background Context
There have been conflicting results on the surgical outcome of lumbar fusion surgery using two different techniques: robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation and conventional freehand technique. In addition, there have been no studies about the biomechanical issues between both techniques.Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical properties in terms of stress at adjacent segments using robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion technique (robot-assisted, minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion, Rom-PLIF) and freehand technique (conventional, freehand, open approach, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, Cop-PLIF) for instrumented lumbar fusion surgery.Study Design
This is an additional post-hoc analysis for patient-specific finite element (FE) model.Patient Sample
The sample is composed of patients with degenerative lumbar disease.Outcome Measures
Intradiscal pressure and facet contact force are the outcome measures.Methods
Patients were randomly assigned to undergo an instrumented PLIF procedure using a Rom-PLIF (37 patients) or a Cop-PLIF (41), respectively. Five patients in each group were selected using a simple random sampling method after operation, and 10 preoperative and postoperative lumbar spines were modeled from preoperative high-resolution computed tomography of 10 patients using the same method for a validated lumbar spine model. Under four pure moments of 7.5?Nm, the changes in intradiscal pressure and facet joint contact force at the proximal adjacent segment following fusion surgery were analyzed and compared with preoperative states.Results
The representativeness of random samples was verified. Both groups showed significant increases in postoperative intradiscal pressure at the proximal adjacent segment under four moments, compared with the preoperative state. The Cop-PLIF models demonstrated significantly higher percent increments of intradiscal pressure at proximal adjacent segments under extension, lateral bending, and torsion moments than the Rom-PLIF models (p=.032, p=.008, and p=.016, respectively). Furthermore, the percent increment of facet contact force was significantly higher in the Cop-PLIF models under extension and torsion moments than in the Rom-PLIF models (p=.016 under both extension and torsion moments).Conclusions
The present study showed the clinical application of subject-specific FE analysis in the spine. Even though there was biomechanical superiority of the robot-assisted insertions in terms of alleviation of stress increments at adjacent segments after fusion, cautious interpretation is needed because of the small sample size. 相似文献13.
Remko Soer Patrick Vroomen Roy Stewart Maarten Coppes Patrick Stegeman Pieter Dijkstra Michiel Reneman 《The spine journal》2017,17(4):603-609
Background Context
The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (ÖMPQ) has good psychometric properties to predict return to work in patients with acute low back pain. Although it is used in patients with chronic back pain and nonworkers, there is no evidence on the factor structure of the ÖMPQ in these populations. This is deemed an important prerequisite for future prediction studies.Purpose
This study aimed to analyze the factor structure of the ÖMPQ in working and nonworking patients with chronic back pain.Study Design/Setting
This is a cross-sectional study in a university-based spine center.Patient Sample
The patient sample consists two cohorts of working and nonworking adult patients (>18 years) with specific and nonspecific chronic back pain.Outcome Measures
The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire.Methods
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed in working (N=557) and nonworking (N=266) patients for three, four, five, and six factors identified in literature. A goodness of fit index was calculated by a chi-square. Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was calculated, and the number of factors identified was based on RMSEA values <.05. A Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) and a normed fit index (NFI) >0.90 are considered to indicate acceptable fit.Results
In working patients, a five-factor solution had the best fit (RMSEA<0.05; NFI and TLI >0.90), but substantial adaptations should be made to get proper fit (removal of the work-related items). In nonworking patients, a four-factor analysis had the best fit (RMSEA<0.05). For both samples, items related to duration could not fit in the overall model.Conclusions
Factor structure of the ÖMPQ was not confirmed in working and nonworking patients with chronic back pain. Substantial adaptations should be made to obtain a factor structure with acceptable fit. 相似文献14.
Cun-Xin Zhang Ting Wang Jin-Feng Ma Yang Liu Zheng-Gang Zhou De-Chun Wang 《The spine journal》2017,17(7):1017-1025
Background Context
Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is the main cause of low back pain, and nucleus pulposus (NP) cell apoptosis is an important risk factor of IDD. However, the molecular mechanism of this disease remains unknown.Purpose
To assess the potential protective effect of CDDO-ethyl amide (EA) against high-glucose-induced oxidative stress injury in NP cells and to investigate the mechanism of antioxidative effects and apoptotic inhibition.Study Design/Setting
To find new molecule to inhibit intervertebral disc degeneration.Methods
Viability, reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and apoptosis were examined in NP cells. The protein expression levels of HO-1 and Nrf2 were measured through Western blotResults
CDDO-EA elicited cytoprotective effects against NP cell apoptosis and ROS accumulation induced by high glucose. CDDO-EA treatment increased the HO-1 and Nrf2 expression abrogated by HO-1, Nrf2, and mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors.Conclusions
The phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of Nrf2 are crucial for HO-1 overexpression induced by CDDO-EA, which is essential for the cytoprotection against high–glucose-induced oxidative stress in NP cells. 相似文献15.
Geoff P. Bostick 《The spine journal》2017,17(11):1722-1728
Background Context
Psychological treatments delivered by non-psychologists have been proposed as a way to increase access to care to address important psychological barriers to recovery in people with low back pain (LBP).Purpose
This review aimed to synthesize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assess the effectiveness of psychological interventions delivered by non-psychologists in reducing pain intensity and disability in adults with LBP, compared with usual care.Study Design
A systematic review without meta-analysis was carried out.Methods
Randomized controlled trials including adult patients with all types of musculoskeletal LBP were eligible. Interventions included those based on psychological principles and delivered by non-psychologists. The primary outcomes of interest were self-reported pain intensity and disability. Information sources included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Registrar for Controlled Trials. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was used for the evaluation of internal validity.Results
There were 1,101 records identified, 159 were assessed for eligibility, 16 were critically appraised, and 11 studies were included. Mild to moderate risk of bias was present in the included studies, with personnel and patient blinding, treatment fidelity, and attrition being the most common sources of bias. Considerable heterogeneity existed for patient population, intervention components, and comparison groups. Although most studies demonstrated statistical and clinical improvements in pain and disability, few were statistically superior to the comparison group.Conclusions
Consistent with the broader psychological literature, psychological interventions delivered by non-psychologists have modest effects on low back pain and disability. Additional high quality research is needed to understand what patients are likely to respond to psychological interventions, the appropriate dose to achieve the desired outcome, the amount of training required to implement psychological interventions, and the optimal procedures to ensure treatment fidelity. 相似文献16.
Stéphane Genevay Delphine S. Courvoisier Kika Konstantinou Francisco M. Kovacs Marc Marty James Rainville Michael Norberg Jean-François Kaux Thomas D. Cha Jeffrey N. Katz Steven J. Atlas 《The spine journal》2017,17(10):1464-1471
Background Context
Classification criteria are recommended for diseases that lack specific biomarkers to improve homogeneity in clinical research studies. Because imaging evidence of lumbar disc herniations (LDHs) may not be associated with symptoms, clinical classification criteria based on patient symptoms and physical examination findings are required.Purpose
This study aimed to produce clinical classification criteria to identify patients with radicular pain caused by LDH.Study Design
The study design was a two-stage process. Phase 1 included a Delphi process and Phase 2 included a cohort study.Patient Sample
The patient sample included outpatients recruited from spine clinics in five countries.Outcome Measures
The outcome measures were items from history and physical examination.Materials and Methods
In Phase 1, 17 spine experts participated in a Delphi process to select symptoms and signs suggesting radicular pain caused by LDH. In Phase 2, 19 different clinical experts identified patients they confidently classified as presenting with (1) radicular pain caused by LDH, (2) neurogenic claudication (NC) caused by lumbar spinal stenosis, or (3) non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) with referred leg pain. Patients completed survey items and specialists documented examination signs. A score to predict radicular pain caused by LDH was developed based on the coefficients of the multivariate model. An unrestricted grant of less than US$15,000 was received from MSD: It was used to support the conception of the Delphi, data management, and statistical analysis. No fees were allocated to participating spine specialists.Results
Phase 1 generated a final list of 74 potential symptoms and signs. In Phase 2, 209 patients with pain caused by LDH (89), NC (63), or NSLBP (57) were included. Items predicting radicular pain caused by LDH (p<.05) were monoradicular leg pain distribution, patient-reported unilateral leg pain, positive straight leg raise test <60° (or femoral stretch test), unilateral motor weakness, and asymmetric ankle reflex. The score had an AUC of 0.91. An easy-to-use weighted set of criteria with similar psychometric characteristics is proposed (specificity 90.4%, sensitivity 70.6%).Conclusions
Classification criteria for identifying patients with radicular pain caused by LDH are proposed. Their use could improve the homogeneity of patients enrolled in clinical research studies. 相似文献17.
Background Context
Epidural steroid injection is commonly used in patients with chronic low back pain. Applying a mixture of a local anesthetic (LA) and steroid using the interlaminar (IL), transforaminal, and caudal techniques is a preferred approach.Purpose
The present study aims to investigate the efficacy of interlaminar epidural steroid administration in patients with multilevel lumbar disc pathology (LDP) and to assess the possible correlation of the procedure's success with age and body mass index (BMI).Study Design
A randomized controlled trial was performed.Patient Sample
We administered interlaminar epidural steroid to a total of 98 patients with multilevel LDP.Outcome Measures
The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scoring were performed on the study population at pretreatment (PRT), posttreatment, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 PRT months. A possible correlation of BMI and age with the procedure success was evaluated.Methods
The LA group (Group L, n=50) received 10?mL 0.25% bupivacaine, whereas the steroid+LA group (Group S, n=48) received 10?mL 0.25% bupivacaine+40?mg methylprednisolone at L4–L5 intervertebral space in prone position under the guidance of C-arm fluoroscopy.Results
There was no statistical difference in the PRT VAS and ODI scores between the groups (p<.05), whereas the VAS and ODI scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 posttreatment months were higher in Group L, compared with Group S (p<.05). Age and BMI were not found to be related with the success of the procedure.Conclusions
Our study results showed that the VAS and ODI scores were lower in patients with multilevel LDP receiving steroid, following the administration of IL epidural injection. However, further studies are required to establish a robust conclusion on the dispersion of IL epidural injections in the epidural area and the dose of steroid. 相似文献18.
Caleb J. Behrend Etienne M. Schönbach Alexander R. Vaccaro Ellen Coyne Mark L. Prasarn Glenn R. Rechtine 《The spine journal》2017,17(8):1061-1065
Background Context
Determining pain intensity is largely dependent on the patient's report.Purpose
The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that patients initially reporting a pain score of 10 out of 10 on the visual analog scale (VAS) would experience symptom improvement to a degree similar to patients reporting milder pain.Study Design
This study is a retrospective chart review.Patient Sample
A total of 6,779 patients seeking care for spinal disorders were included in the study.Outcome Measures
The outcome measures used in the study were pain scores on the VAS pain scale, smoking status, morbid depression, gender, and the presence of known secondary gain.Materials and Methods
Patients with lumbar degenerative disk disease with or without spinal stenosis who reported a VAS pain score of 10 out of 10 were identified. Changes in reported VAS pain, patient age, smoking status, morbid depression, gender, and the presence of known secondary gain were examined.Results
A total of 160 individuals (2.9%) reported a maximum pain score of 10 out of 10 on a VAS at their initial presentation. The patients had a median improvement of 3 points in reported VAS pain between the first visit and the last follow-up appointment. The odds to improve by at least 40% on the VAS were 1.500 (95% confidence interval 1.090–2.065) compared with patients reporting submaximal pain. The proportion of patients with identifiable secondary gain was higher (p=.001) than that of patients with submaximal pain. Patients whose pain scores improved dramatically (ie, at least 4 points on the VAS) tended to be older (p=.001), to less often have secondary gain from their disease (p=.007), and to have a negative current smoking status (p=.002). Patients whose pain remained 10 out of 10 during the course of treatment smoked more frequently (p=.016).Conclusions
Our analysis supports the need to consider the influence of secondary gain on the patients' reported VAS pain scores. Maximum pain seems to be a more acute phenomenon with some likelihood to significantly improve. 相似文献19.
20.