Complication of jejunal pouch interposition after proximal gastrectomy: case report

Interposition of a jejunal pouch after proximal gastrectomy is a popular reconstruction method in Japan, because it produces a good quality of life soon after surgery. Many reports have described its usefulness. However, there are few reports describing its complications. We report here for the first time a case of pouch stasis needing surgery. A 23-year-old man underwent proximal gastrectomy with interposed jejunal pouch for traumatic strangulated diaphragmatic hernia. Three years later, he complained of persistent vomiting. Since surgery, he had eaten as much as other young people. An upper gastrointestinal series showed dilatation of the jejunal pouch and stasis of contrast medium. Since conservative therapy was not effective, surgery was performed. In the operative findings, the jejunal pouch was extremely dilated, the remaining stomach had become atrophic, and moreover, the anastomosis was severely distorted. It was considered that frequent excessive ingestion caused irreversible dilatation of the jejunal pouch, resulting in pouch stasis. Even though the jejunal pouch is interposed for reconstruction, it is very important to give nutritional guidance to patients, especially young patients, to prevent pouch stasis caused by excessive food ingestion.     

Serious complications after a proximal gastrectomy with a jejunal pouch interposition for gastric cancer

Proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition is a common surgical method in Japan, because the procedure has been shown to give a better post-operative quality of life. Some complications are associated with it. However, esophageal candidiasis and linear marginal ulcer along the gastrojejunal anastomosis after the surgical method has never previously been reported. We herein report a case of a patient who developed serious complications after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition. A 68-year-old man underwent proximal gastrectomy with a jejunal pouch interposition for reconstruction for type 1 gastric cancer. Twenty-three months after the procedure, he complained of dysphagia and epigastric pain. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed esophageal candidiasis. The patient improved symptomatically following antifungal medication with fluconazole. Eleven months later, the patient developed severe pneumonia. In subsequent days, a melena episode occurred. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a linear marginal ulcer along three-fourths of the gastrojejunal anastomosis. The ulcer was drug resistant. The patient died of respiratory failure. Jejunal pouch interposition after a proximal gastrectomy can be associated with significant complications. Further studies are required to identify the best condition of the procedure.     

Anti-reflux pouch-esophagostomy after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal pouch interposition reconstruction

Reflux esophagitis is a serious postoperative complication for patients undergoing gastrectomy. We designed a new jejunal pouch-esophagostomy to prevent reflux after proximal gastrectomy. After proximal gastrectomy, ajejunal segment about 17 cm long was folded. Side-to-side jejuno-jejunostomy was made using a linear stapler with 100-mm staples along the length at the anti-mesenteric side. A 10-cm-longjejunal pouch with a 7-cm-long apical bridge was made. Esophago-jejuno end-to-side anastomosis (pouch-esophagostomy) was made with circular stapler at the right anterior wall the apical bridge. We add "partial posterior fundoplication" like wrapping using the apical bridge of the jejunal pouch. Patients with this new anti-reflux anastomosis showed no reflux on barium meal study even in the right anterior oblique deep Trendelenburg's position. Jejunal pouch reconstruction with partial posterior wrapping provides a satisfactory result with regard to preventing reflux esophagitis.     

Postoperative evaluation of the jejunal pouch reconstruction following proximal and distal gastrectomy for cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of the jejunal pouch reconstruction following subtotal proximal and distal gastrectomy, a retrospective study examining the postoperative condition of patients who underwent different methods of reconstruction after gastrectomy for cancer was undertaken. METHODOLOGY: Various parameters indicative of postoperative function were evaluated at one year postoperatively, and two major groups were examined. The "proximal gastrectomy" group was composed of patients who underwent either 1) proximal gastrectomy with an interposed jejunal pouch (PG-pouch), 2) proximal gastrectomy with simple jejunal interposition (PG-inter), or 3) total gastrectomy with simple jejunal interposition (TG). The "distal gastrectomy" group was composed of patients who underwent either 4) distal gastrectomy with an interposed jejunal pouch (DG-pouch), 5) distal gastrectomy with simple jejunal interposition (DG-inter), or 6) distal gastrectomy with Billroth 1 reconstruction (B-1). RESULTS: Volume of meal intake was better preserved and the incidence of abdominal symptoms were less frequent in the PG-pouch and DG-pouch groups. In the PG-inter, DG-inter and DG-pouch groups, none of the patients experienced heartburn or had endoscopic findings consistent with reflux esophagitis, while 2 patients (20.0%) in the PG-pouch group complained of heartburn with evidence of reflux esophagitis on endoscopy. Increase in blood acetaminophen level was milder in both the PG-pouch and DG-pouch groups, signifying improved gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS: The jejunal pouch interposition following proximal and distal gastrectomy seems to confer clinical benefit in terms of postoperative function, especially in the form of meal intake, abdominal symptoms, and gastric emptying. The side effect of an improved reservoir may be the incidence of reflux esophagitis seen in 2 patients in the PG-pouch group.     

Evaluation of reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy: prospective comparative study of jejunal interposition and jejunal pouch interposition

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To prevent various distresses after proximal gastrectomy, reconstruction by interposed jejunal pouch has been advocated as an organ-preserving surgical strategy to ensure favorable quality of life for the patients. METHODOLOGY: Proximal gastrectomy was performed in 9 patients with gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Four patients were randomly selected for reconstruction by jejunal pouch interposition (JPI group), while 5 had reconstruction by jejunal interposition (JI group). The patients who underwent JPI and JI were followed up to evaluate resumption of normal diet, change in body weight, and clinical symptoms. RESULTS: The JPI group showed a significant dietary advantage. Three months after surgery, JPI patients could eat more than 80% of the volume of their preoperative meals, whereas JI patients ate less than 50%. The percentage of postoperative body weight loss was higher in the JI group than in the JPI group because the volume of the remnant stomach was more adequate in the latter. Moreover, it was easier to enter the remnant stomach and duodenum for endoscopic fiberscopy in the JPI group for the treatment of hepato-biliary pancreatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: JPI is an effective method for preservation of gastric function after proximal gastrectomy.     

Proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and TGRY anastomosis for proximal gastric cancer

AIM: To compare the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition (PGJI) with those undergoing total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis (TGRY).METHODS: From January 2009 to January 2011, thirty-five patients underwent PGJI, and forty-one patients underwent TGRY. The surgical efficacy and short-term follow-up outcomes were compared between the two groups.RESULTS: There were no differences in the demographic and clinicopathological characteristics. The mean operation duration and postoperative hospital stay in the PGJI group were statistically longer than those in the TGRY group (P = 0.00). No anastomosis leakage was observed in two groups. No statistically significant difference was found in endoscopic findings, Visick grade or serum albumin level. The single-meal food intake in the PGJI group was more than that in the TGRY group (P = 0.00). The PG group showed significantly better hemoglobin levels in the second year (P = 0.02). The two-year survival rate was not significantly different (PGJI vs TGRY, 93.55% vs 92.5%, P = 1.0).CONCLUSION: PGJI is a safe, radical surgical method for proximal gastric cancer and leads to better outcomes in terms of the single-meal food intake and hemoglobin level, compared with TGRY in the short term.     

New method for jejunal pouch interposition reconstruction after distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recently pouch reconstruction has been reported to improve quality of life and functional results after surgery for gastric cancer. Although jejunal pouch reconstruction after distal gastrectomy has favorable results for patients' quality of life, it is complicated and takes a long time to complete. We developed a new technique using a linear stapling device to avoid this problem. METHODOLOGY: The duodenum and the jejunum are simultaneously divided with a 100-mm linear stapler 0.5 cm distal to the pyrolus ring and 20 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz, respectively. A 100-mm linear stapler is introduced into two approximated segments of the jejunum through two small stab wounds 10 cm and 15 cm distal to the stump, respectively, and side-to-side anastomosis is performed along the antimesenteric borders. The anterior wall of the pouch is cut along the prospective line of anastomosis with the gastric remnant. The anterior wall of the stomach is cut along the planned suture line having a length similar to that of the pouch. The posterior walls of the stomach and the jejunal pouch are placed back-to-back on the planned anastomotic line. End-to-end posterior anastomosis between the gastric remnant and the jejunal pouch is simultaneously performed with gastrectomy using a 100-mm linear stapler. End-to-end anterior anastomosis is created by hand. RESULTS: This technique has been used in 4 patients, and there have been no complications related to the pouch or anastomoses. Mean operative time was 255 +/- 37 min (range: 205-290 min). CONCLUSIONS: Shortening of operative time can be attributed to adoption of end-to-end posterior anastomosis between the stomach and the jejunal pouch using the linear stapling device simultaneously with gastrectomy.     

Results of follow-up endoscopy in patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The present study evaluates the findings of long-term follow-up endoscopy in patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer. METHODOLOGY: A total of 55 patients (45 males, 10 females; 32 to 79 years; mean, 55.9 years), who underwent proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition, were enrolled in the present study. We reviewed the findings of follow-up endoscopy of all patients with particular reference to the development of esophagitis, jejunitis, jejunal ulcer and secondary tumors. RESULTS: We found reflux esophagitis in 6 patients (10.9%) between 12 and 35 months with an average of 22 months after surgery. Jejunitis was discovered in 5 patients (9.0%) between 6 and 96 months with an average of 29 months after surgery. Jejunal ulcer was revealed in 6 patients (10.9%) between 6 and 75 months with an average of 37 months after surgery. Tumors of the remnant stomach, early gastric cancer and gastric adenoma, were identified in 2 patients (3.6%) at 24 months and 69 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Jejunal interposition combined with proximal gastrectomy does not always prevent complications related to regurgitation of gastric content, and may not be a suitable treatment in view of postoperative endoscopic surveillance. Further studies are required to identify an appropriate surgical approach to proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.     

Clinical outcome of jejunal pouch double-tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The importance of the duodenal passage and the need for pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy are matters of controversy. METHODOLOGY: Twenty consecutive patients with early gastric cancer were studied 20who underwent jejunal pouch double-tract (JPD) reconstruction after total gastrectomy. Nutritional variables were examined for > or =10 years postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean operation time was 204 minutes. There was no anastomotic leakage and no hospital mortality. Anastomotic stenosis between the esophagus and a jejunal pouch developed in 2 patients (10%), and reflux esophagitis was observed in 4 (20%). Symptoms were controlled by conserva tive treatment within 3 years after surgery. Body mass indices in all patients were significantly decreased from 1 month (p<0.05) to 10 years (p<0.005) after the operation. The mean body weight decrease occurring during the first to the tenth postoperative year was 12.7% overall, but 17.8% and 9.1% in patients aged > or =60 years and <60 years, respectively. The body weight decreases from 3 (p<0.05) to 6 (p<0.01), and at 9 years (p<0.01) were significantly lower before 60 years of age than after. CONCLUSIONS: JPD reconstruction facilitates long-term recovery of body weight after total gastrectomy and should be considered before the aged of 60.     

Factors associated with early recurrence after curative surgery for gastric cancer

AIM: To characterize patterns of gastric cancer recurrence and patient survival and to identify predictors of early recurrence after surgery.METHODS: Clinicopathological data for 417 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor and node status was reclassified according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis classification for carcinoma of the stomach. Survival data came from both the patients' follow-up records and telephone followups.Recurrent gastric cancer was diagnosed based on clinical imaging, gastroscopy with biopsy, and/or cytological examination of ascites, or intraoperative findings in patients who underwent reoperation.Predictors of early recurrence were compared in patients with pT1 and pT2-4a stage tumors. Pearson's χ 2 test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare differences between categorical variables. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared via the log-rank test. Variables identified as potentially important for early recurrence using univariate analysis were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis.RESULTS: Of 417 gastric cancer patients, 80(19.2%)were diagnosed with early gastric cancer and the remaining 337(80.8%) were diagnosed with locally advanced gastric cancer. After a median follow-up period of 56 mo, 194 patients(46.5%) experiencedrecurrence. The mean time from curative surgery to recurrence in these 194 patients was 24 ± 18 mo(range, 1-84 mo). Additionally, of these 194 patients,129(66.5%) experienced recurrence within 2 years after surgery. There was no significant difference in recurrence patterns between early and late recurrence(P 0.05 each). For pT1 stage gastric cancer, tumor size(P = 0.011) and pN stage(P = 0.048) were associated with early recurrence of gastric tumors.Patient age, pT stage, pN stage, Lauren histotype,lymphovascular invasion, intraoperative chemotherapy,and postoperative chemotherapy were independent predictors of early recurrence in patients with pT2-4a stage gastric cancer(P 0.05 each).CONCLUSION: Age, pT stage, pN stage, Lauren histotype, lymphovascular invasion, intraoperative chemotherapy, and postoperative chemotherapy are independent factors influencing early recurrence of pT2-4a stage gastric cancer.     

Marginal ulcer on the jejunum after proximal gastrectomy by jejunal interposition

Marginal ulcer after proximal gastrectomy has never been previously reported, despite that this procedure preserves the fundic gland area of the stomach, which secretes gastric acid. In this report, we describe a patient who developed a marginal ulcer on the oral side of the gastrojejunal anastomosis after proximal gastrectomy by jejunal interposition. This case serves as a reminder that gastric acid secretion of the remnant stomach must be carefully monitored after proximal gastrectomy in gastric cancer surgery.     

Higher incidence of gastric remnant cancer after proximal than distal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Proximal gastrectomy has been widely accepted as a standard operation for early stage gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach. Therefore, cancer of the distal gastric remnant is now increasing. The aims of this study were to clarify and compare the incidences of gastric remnant cancer after proximal and distal gastrectomy. METHODOLOGY: Data on a consecutive series of 809 cases of gastrectomy performed for early gastric cancer from 1991 to 2003 in Shikoku Cancer Center were analyzed retrospectively with respect to the incidence of gastric remnant cancer. RESULTS: We performed distal gastrectomy in 624 patients and proximal gastrectomy in 47 patients during the study period. After those operations, the gastric remnants of 457 cases and 33 cases, respectively, were surveyed periodically by endoscopic examination at our hospital. Among those surveyed cases, 10 patients (2.2%) and 3 patients (9.1%) were diagnosed as having gastric remnant cancer, respectively. The gastric remnant cancer-free survival after proximal gastrectomy was significantly lower than that after distal gastrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the higher incidence of gastric remnant cancer after proximal gastrectomy, it is more important to survey the gastric remnant after proximal gastrectomy periodically by postoperative endoscopic examination.     

Role of pyloroplasty after proximal gastrectomy for cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The necessity of pyloroplasty as a drainage procedure after proximal gastrectomy remains controversial in terms of the postoperative quality of life. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate whether pyloroplasty is necessary after proximal gastrectomy. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-five patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition between 1993 and 2000 were studied. They were divided into two groups: Group A, jejunal interposition without pyloroplasty (n=17); Group B, jejunal interposition with pyloroplasty (n=18). The subjects were interviewed and examined to assess their symptoms, food intake and body weight at 6, 12, and 24 months after the operation. Endoscopy and a radioisotope gastric emptying test were performed one year postoperatively. RESULTS: A low incidence of epigastric fullness, nausea, and vomiting and a high frequency of patients with greater than 80% of pre-illness food intake were found in Group B. A high recovery of bodyweight was also achieved in Group B. On the other hand, a high incidence of reflux gastritis or bile regurgitation was found in Group B. Gastric emptying was significantly delayed in Group A. CONCLUSIONS: Pyloroplasty as a drainage procedure after proximal gastrectomy is necessary in terms of the clinical symptoms, dietary intake, recovery of body weight, or gastric emptying.     

Delayed gastric emptying after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastric surgery may potentiate delayed gastric emptying. The aims of the study were to determine the frequency and causes of delayed gastric emptying in patients who had undergone distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma and to assess which factors predispose to its development. METHODOLOGY: 209 patients, who had undergone gastrectomy, were evaluated. RESULTS: Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 4.3% of patients receiving a Billroth-I, and 15.5% of patients receiving a Roux-Y reconstruction (p = 0.01). The patients who had these consecutive symptoms following Roux-Y operation were all clinically diagnosed as having Roux stasis syndrome. The delayed gastric emptying after Roux-Y operation was more frequent in patients receiving extensive lymph node dissection than those receiving conventional dissection (p<0.05). The symptoms spontaneously subsided, and postoperative body weight loss was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the strong association between delayed gastric emptying and the Roux-Y procedure, it enables a relatively early return to oral intake.