Initial Experience with New Intraluminal Devices for GERD Barrett’s Esophagus and Obesity

Background

Transoral intraluminal surgery is less painful. However, endoscopic antireflux procedures have been unsuccessful, endoscopic foregut mucosal excision procedures are often difficult to perform, and endoscopic intra-luminal suturing is both imprecise and too shallow. We have endeavored to correct these deficiencies and report here new devices for GERD, obesity, and Barrett’s mucosal excision.

Method

A retrospective review of ex vivo and in vivo animal experiments using sharp blade mucosal excision for esophageal and gastric mucosa and a suturing device with transverse needles designed to full thickness penetrate the gastric wall were completed. A total of 338 excisions were performed in 134 ex vivo tissue experiments and in 119 in vivo attempts. Suture needle testing was performed in ex vivo human stomachs and porcine stomachs and in in vivo canine and baboon stomachs.

Results

One excision perforation (0.9%) occurred in a live animal. Satisfactory mucosal excision depth for the Barrett’s device was reproducible. Progressive suture actuation reliability improved from 83% during ex vivo testing to 96.7% in in vivo experiments.

Conclusion

The results demonstrate feasibility, reliability, and safety for gastric and esophageal mucosal excision. Suturing reliability improved and further studies will be performed to finalize the instrument designs, the operative techniques, and the other device applications.

     

From Heartburn to Barrett’s Esophagus,and Beyond

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects an estimated 20% of the population in the USA, and its prevalence is increasing worldwide. About 10–15% of patients with GERD will develop Barrett’s esophagus (BE).

Aims

The aims of this study were to review the available evidence of the pathophysiology of BE and the role of anti-reflux surgery in the treatment of this disease.

Results

The transformation of the squamous epithelium into columnar epithelium with goblet cells is due to the chronic injury produced by repeated reflux episodes. It involves genetic mutations that in some patients may lead to high-grade dysplasia and cancer. There is no strong evidence that anti-reflux surgery is associated with resolution or improvement in BE, and its indications should be the same as for other GERD patients without BE.

Conclusions

Patients with BE without dysplasia require endoscopic surveillance, while those with low- or high-grade dysplasia should have consideration of endoscopic eradication therapy followed by surveillance. New endoscopic treatment modalities are being developed, which hold the promise to improve the management of patients with BE.

     

Current Concepts in Treatment of Barrett’s Esophagus With and Without Dysplasia

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery - Around 10–15% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease will develop Barrett’s esophagus (BE). The development of novel endoscopic...     

Long-term Follow-up After Anti-reflux Surgery in Patients with Barrett’s Esophagus

Background  

Factors associated with the risk of progression of Barrett’s esophagus remain unclear, and the impact of therapy on this risk remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess patients followed long-term after anti-reflux surgery for Barrett’s esophagus.     

Expression of C1q Complement Component in Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Aims  

C1q, an element of the first component of complement, is known to be expressed by interdigitating and follicular dendritic cells in the spleen, where it has been suggested that C1q is involved in capturing immune complexes. The present study investigated whether C1q is expressed in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma and, if so, whether its expression is associated with dendritic cells.     

Barrett’s Esophagus: Environmental Influences in the Progression of Dysplasia

Barretts esophagus (BE) is composed of multiple lineages including Paneth cells and endocrine cells in addition to gastric and intestinal cells. Although the origin of the BE stem cell is a matter of conjecture, the stem cells are clearly multipotent, and therefore the phenotype is restricted by genomic imprinting (termed restricted potency). Recent evidence suggests that the microenvironment may select various lineages. In this regard the proportion of gastric and specialized intestinal metaplastic cells has been attributed to the composition of the refluxate, acid or bile, respectively. Experimental evidence also implicates specific xenobiotics in this process, including bile acids. In particular we discuss the potential biologic roles of bile acids in epithelial adaptation from in vivo and in vitro models.