Blood pressure in children with chronic kidney disease: a report from the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children study

To characterize the distribution of blood pressure (BP), prevalence, and risk factors for hypertension in pediatric chronic kidney disease, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline BPs in 432 children (mean age 11 years; 60% male; mean glomerular filtration rate 44 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)) enrolled in the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children cohort study. BPs were obtained using an aneroid sphygmomanometer. Glomerular filtration rate was measured by iohexol disappearance. Elevated BP was defined as BP >or=90th percentile for age, gender, and height. Hypertension was defined as BP >or=95th percentile or as self-reported hypertension plus current treatment with antihypertensive medications. For systolic BP, 14% were hypertensive and 11% were prehypertensive (BP 90th to 95th percentile); 68% of subjects with elevated systolic BP were taking antihypertensive medications. For diastolic BP, 14% were hypertensive and 9% were prehypertensive; 53% of subjects with elevated diastolic BP were taking antihypertensive medications. Fifty-four percent of subjects had either systolic or diastolic BP >or=95th percentile or a history of hypertension plus current antihypertensive use. Characteristics associated with elevated BP included black race, shorter duration of chronic kidney disease, absence of antihypertensive medication use, and elevated serum potassium. Among subjects receiving antihypertensive treatment, uncontrolled BP was associated with male sex, shorter chronic kidney disease duration, and absence of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker use. Thirty-seven percent of children with chronic kidney disease had either elevated systolic or diastolic BP, and 39% of these were not receiving antihypertensives, indicating that hypertension in pediatric chronic kidney disease may be frequently under- or even untreated. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers may improve BP control in these patients.     

NSAID use and BP in treated hypertensives: a retrospective controlled observational study

The objective of this study was to investigate the association between NSAID use and blood pressure (BP) among a sample of treated hypertensive patients. A controlled observational study was designed in UK primary care setting. Patients with diagnosed hypertension and currently being prescribed antihypertensive medication registered with four general practices, comparing patients also prescribed NSAIDs (exposed) to those not prescribed NSAIDs (unexposed). Majority of the patients were elderly. Systolic and diastolic pressure were the outcome measures. Data were collected for 184 NSAID users and 762 nonusers with a mean age of 68 years. There was no difference in either systolic (adjusted difference 1.9 mmHg, 95% CI -0.7 to 4.5, P=0.15) or diastolic (adjusted difference 1.0 mmHg, 95% CI -0.3 to 2.3, P=0.15) blood pressure. There was no evidence of any interactions according to categories of age, sex, or number of antihypertensive drugs prescribed. Among NSAID users, there was no evidence of any differences in blood pressure according to NSAID type or dose. In conclusion we found no evidence for an association between NSAID usage and BP control in known hypertensive patients receiving antihypertensive medication in primary care. The reported association between NSAID use and BP control appears much less substantial than has been previously suggested.     

Optimal treatment of hypertension in the elderly: A Korean perspective

With the progression of the aging population, common diseases of the elderly have become the center of attention in most developed countries. Hypertension is one of the most common morbid conditions in the elderly and has a great impact on their health status because it is the main risk factor of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. However, a considerable amount of uncertainty remains regarding hypertension in the elderly, such as the benefits of hypertension control in oldest-old populations, the optimal level of blood pressure control, and the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs for the prevention of cognitive dysfunction. While there are many controversial issues concerning the optimal management of hypertension in the elderly, the number of elderly hypertensive patients that require treatment is expected to increase due to the aging population. As a result, knowledge regarding the mechanisms of hypertension in the elderly and specific consideration in managing hypertensive elderly patients are needed to improve the clinical outcome. Furthermore, new therapeutic interventions that are aimed at attenuating age-related vascular changes should be investigated, because hypertension in the elderly, especially isolated systolic hypertension has specific characteristics of increased arterial stiffness in most cases.     

Prevalence and therapeutic control of hypertension in 30,000 subjects in the workplace

-To assess blood pressure (BP) control in a French working population through the use of a careful assessment of BP based on 2 different visits in 1 month, 17 359 men and 12 267 women were evaluated from January 1997 to April 1998. The initial phase was a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study designed to assess the incidence of arterial hypertension in a French working population. Information was collected by the work-site physician during the annual examination. BP was measured with a validated automatic device. Among subjects with BP >/= mm Hg, patients not treated with antihypertensive drugs were invited to have an additional BP measurement taken 1 month later. The prevalence of hypertension (BP >/= mm Hg) based on 2 visits was 16.2% in men and 9.4% in women. When the diagnosis of hypertension was based on 2 visits, its prevalence was 41% lower in men and 36% lower in women compared with that of a diagnosis based on a single visit. Accordingly, the awareness of hypertension was 49% higher in men and 40% higher in women. Overall, 12.5% of hypertensive men and 33.2% of hypertensive women taking antihypertensive medication had their BP levels lowered to < mm Hg by treatment. Although the percentage of hypertensive men and women under current treatment who were aware of their hypertension increased with age, BP control among treated subjects decreased with age. Ineffective BP control with treatment accounted for 33% of BP levels >/= mm Hg in men and 40% of those observed in women. In this large French working population, estimates of hypertension therapeutic control depend heavily on the number of BP measurements. Despite these methodological precautions, insufficient awareness of BP and insufficient BP control through treatment remain 2 major public health problems.     

Patient characteristics and their influence on therapy and its outcome in hypertension of the elderly

A retrospective study was undertaken to analyze the effects of various patient factors on therapy and its outcome in elderly hypertensive subjects. Two hundred and three male hypertensives with a mean age of 63.1 years at entry, were followed in a special hypertension clinic by nurse practitioners under physician supervision, for 2 years or more (mean 3.7 years). Good patient compliance (84%) and blood pressure (BP) reduction were achieved and these were enhanced by advancing age. Neither excessive weight, nor widespread atherosclerosis seemed to interfere with BP control. However, while diastolic BP was well controlled with antihypertensive therapy, systolic BP tended to remain higher than 160 mm Hg in many of the older and more atherosclerotic subjects. Pharmacological treatment did not prevent a gradual although modest deterioration of renal function, which was related to both age and hypertension, and represents a greater problem in black patients. Because of the limitations of such a retrospective study, its conclusions may not be extrapolated for treatment of hypertension in all the elderly.     

Gender differences in hypertension treatment, drug utilization patterns, and blood pressure control among US adults with hypertension: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004

BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend the same approach for treating hypertensive men and women. It is not known, however, whether current US antihypertensive medication utilization patterns and the resulting degrees of blood pressure (BP) control are similar or different among hypertensive women and men. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of the noninstitutionalized civilian US population. Persons aged > or =18 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2004 were classified as hypertensive based on a BP > or =140/90 mm Hg, currently taking antihypertensive medication, or having been diagnosed by a physician. RESULTS: Among hypertensives, the prevalence of antihypertensive medication use was significantly higher among women than men (61.4% vs. 56.8%), especially among middle-aged persons (40-49 years, 53.1% vs. 42.7%) and among non-Hispanic blacks (65.5% vs. 54.6%). Also, treated women were more likely than men to use diuretics (31.6% vs. 22.3%) and angiotensin receptor blockers (11.3% vs. 8.7%). Among treated hypertensives, the proportion taking three or more antihypertensive drugs was lower among women than men, especially among older persons (60-69 years: 12.3% vs. 19.8%, 70-79 years: 18.6% vs. 21.2%, and > or =80 years: 18.8% vs. 22.8%). Only 44.8% of treated women achieved BP control vs. 51.1% of treated men. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertensive women are significantly more likely to be treated than men, but less likely to have achieved BP control. Additional efforts may be needed to achieve therapeutic goals for the US hypertensive population, especially for hypertensive women.     

Reasons for Switching Antihypertensive Medication in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Czech Nationwide Survey

To improve blood pressure (BP) control of their patients, physicians either adjust or switch antihypertensive medication. Currently, there is only limited information available on why physicians decide to switch antihypertensive medications.A questionnaire-based survey was performed between November 2011 and March 2012 in the Czech Republic. General practitioners were asked to fill in questionnaires about their hypertensive patients whose antihypertensive medication they were planning to change. These questionnaires recorded data about patient demographic information, cardiovascular risk factors, BP values, and reasons for switching antihypertensive medication.Two hundred eight-six general practitioners surveyed a total of 4341 hypertensive patients. The mean age of the patients was 59.8 years, 68.9% of patients were overweight or obese. Uncontrolled office systolic and diastolic BP >140/90 mm Hg was present in 89.6% and 81.5% of patients, respectively, despite the fact that 49.4% of patients used a combination of 2 or more antihypertensive drugs. The most common reasons for switching medication were insufficient BP control (73.7%), followed by aiming for a better 24-hour effect (38.4%) and increased cardiovascular risk of the patients (37.7%).The major reason for switching antihypertensive treatment in general practice was insufficient BP control. Switching medication because of adverse drug effects is less frequent than reported a decade ago.     

Blood pressure, antihypertensive treatment and factors associated with good blood pressure control in hypertensive diabetics: the Tarmidas study

Numerous population studies confirm the high prevalence of hypertension in type II diabetic (DM2) subjects and that intensive antihypertensive treatment is more beneficial to diabetic than to nondiabetic hypertensive subjects, yet not many of these are specific to Spain. To assess the degree of blood pressure (BP) control and the effects of antihypertensive drugs in the medical management of hypertension in diabetic patients in specialist care centres throughout Spain, we studied the socio-demographic, clinical and relevant laboratory parameters of 796 hypertensive patients with DM2 (mean age 66.09 (95% confidence interval (CI): 64.08-68.10). The percentage of diabetic patients responding positively to BP control measures was lower when compared to the nondiabetic population in both Spain and Europe. The degree of control was poorer for systolic than for diastolic BP, yet 40.6% of the patients were only on monotherapy. The fact that antihypertensive treatment was modified in only 40% of the poorly controlled patients was also highly significant and could be attributed to a nonstringent use of clinical guidelines. Among the other differences between well-controlled and poorly controlled patients, we found that well-controlled patients presented with lower levels of cholesterol and triglycerides, a lower prevalence of excess weight/obesity, and a greater prevalence of cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular disease despite having a greater percentage of patients on antiplatelet therapy. Better application of therapeutic guidelines and the prevention and treatment of compounding factors could improve the response rate to BP control measures in poorly controlled patients.     

High-risk patients with hypertension: Are we doing enough?

Despite the increasing risk of cardiovascular disease, especially in patients with multiple risk factors, blood pressure (BP) control remains suboptimal. This study investigated real-world BP goal attainment and prescribing patterns for high-risk patients. A retrospective chart review study was conducted in patients treated by eight large primary care physician group practices between December 2003 and May 2006. A total of 1,917 hypertensive patients were identified with ≥1 risk factors: African-American ethnicity (634); diabetes (851); advanced age (1,123); body mass index (BMI) 25 kg/m² (1,614). BP control rate was 46% overall, and similar in the advanced age and overweight/obese subpopulations, but substantially lower (28%) in the diabetic subpopulation. Systolic blood pressure ≥20 mm Hg above the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment Report recommendation was found in 13% of the overall, advanced age and overweight/obese subpopulations, and in 20% of diabetics and 18% of African-Americans. Overall, 62% of patients received ≥2 antihypertensive while 36% of diabetics, 31% of African-Americans, 28% of advanced age, and 26% of overweight/obese patients received ≥3 antihypertensive classes. Despite availability of multiple antihypertensive classes, BP control rates were still suboptimal in this study's high-risk patients. There is a need for awareness and more aggressive treatment in high-risk patients given their increased risk of poor outcomes.     

Blood Pressure J-Curve: Current Concepts

The blood pressure (BP) J-curve debate started in 1979, and we still cannot definitively answer all the questions. However, available studies of antihypertensive treatment provide strong evidence for J-shaped relationships between both diastolic and systolic BP and main outcomes in the general population of hypertensive patients, as well as in high-risk populations, including subjects with coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, left ventricular hypertrophy, and elderly patients. However, further studies are still necessary in order to clarify this issue. This is connected to the fact that most available studies were observational, and randomized trials did not have or lost their statistical power and were inconclusive. Perhaps only the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) and Optimal Blood Pressure and Cholesterol Targets for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Hypertensives (ESH-CHL-SHOT) will be able to finally answer all the questions. According to the current state of knowledge, it seems reasonable to suggest lowering BP to values within the 130?C139/80?C85?mmHg range, possibly close to the lower values in this range, in all hypertensive patients and to be very careful with further BP level reductions, especially in high-risk hypertensive patients.     

Prevalence of high-risk cardiovascular conditions and the status of hypertension management among hypertensive adults 65 years and older in the United States: analysis of a primary care electronic medical records database

This study compared the prevalence of high-risk cardiovascular (CV) conditions, antihypertensive medication treatment patterns, and demographic and clinical characteristics associated with blood pressure (BP) goal attainment between elderly (65 years and older) and nonelderly (younger than 65 years) adults with hypertension. Retrospective cohort study was conducted using an electronic medical record database among patients receiving at least 1 antihypertensive medication. CV risk profiles were assessed by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision diagnosis codes. Treatment patterns were assessed by the number of antihypertensive medications prescribed. BP goal attainment was determined by the mean of the last 2 BP readings during 1 year of follow-up. Logistic regression estimated the odds of achieving BP goal. There were 61,355 nonelderly (mean age, 51.8 years) and 47,796 elderly (mean age, 73.2 years) patients in the study. Elderly patients had statistically significant higher levels of isolated systolic hypertension and complicated hypertension. Elderly patients had statistically significant higher levels of prescribing patterns characterized by multiple antihypertensive medications but statistically significant lower levels of BP goal attainment. Age 65 years and older, African American race, body mass index ≥30, and the presence of complicated hypertension were found to be statistically significant factors contributing to a lower likelihood of BP goal attainment. Despite aggressive antihypertensive treatment, elderly patients are less likely to achieve BP goals.     

Blood pressure during sleep: antihypertensive medication

To investigate whether excessive reduction of blood pressure (BP) by antihypertensive medications correlates with myocardial infarction, especially during sleep in elderly patients, we used telemetry and cuvette dye-dilution methods to assess the direct BP and the hemodynamics of 68 inpatients with essential hypertension during wakefulness and sleep. There were 25 patients greater than or equal to 60 years old (OH-group) and 43 were less than or equal to 59 years old (YH-group). Of the OH-group, 36% showed high BP during the day, with marked decreases (minimum BP less than 110/70 mm Hg) during sleep. Average cardiac index (CI) of the OH-group was low during wakefulness and extremely low during slow-wave sleep. Changes of mean BP in the OH-group correlated with changes in total peripheral vascular resistance index (TPRI) during sleep, but this correlation was not observed in the YH-group. The antihypertensive effects on nocturnal BP of the various medications was: central adrenergic inhibitors less than or equal to beta blockers with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity less than or equal to alpha (alpha beta) blockers less than or equal to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors less than or equal to calcium antagonists. Because BP and CI were found to be very low and TPRI seems to play an important role in BP regulation in sleeping elderly patients, excessive antihypertensive medication may be harmful to this subgroup. However, because the effects on nocturnal BP differ among various antihypertensive treatments, further research is required on the relation between antihypertensive medication and the hemodynamics of sleeping elderly hypertensive patients.     

Efficacy of antihypertensive treatment in the French population. A multicenter survey]

In order to assess the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment in the population, a study was undertaken in 5 French cities during the commercial fairs of Grenoble, Marseilles, Nice, Toulouse and Lille. The blood pressure was measured according to the WHO recommendations in volunteers. The study included a total of 7107 subjects of both sexes, with 4064 subjects in the 35-64 year age group. The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in the 791 hypertensive patients who knew their antihypertensive therapy. Taking < 160/95 mmHg as the criterion of efficacy, 52 to 73% of the hypertensive patients were well controlled. However, if the therapeutic objective of normalisation of the blood pressure (BP < 140/90 mmHg) is taken as the criterion of efficacy, only 23 to 29% of the hypertensive patients were controlled whilst their BP remained significantly higher than that of normotensive controls of the same age. The difference in efficacy of antihypertensive therapy between the cities may be explained by the heterogenicity of the populations whereas the treatment did not differ significantly. After adjustment analysis with respect to sex showed that women were better controlled than men whatever the criterion chosen. The group controlled at BP < 160/95 mmHg only differed from the group < 140/90 with respect to the average BP value which was higher before treatment and decreased less with treatment; though this did not achieve statistical significance. In matters of public health, if the ideal blood pressure is taken as < 140/90 mmHg, this study shows that the objective is only attained in one out of four patients in the population studied.     

Antihypertensive treatment and postprandial blood pressure reduction in the elderly

Recently it has been demonstrated that blood pressure in the elderly decreases after a meal. To evaluate the influence of antihypertensive treatment on postprandial blood pressure reduction in the elderly, the effects of a breakfast (405 kcal) on blood pressure and heart rate were studied in 15 healthy normotensive elderly subjects (mean age 79.5 +/- 6.0 years), in 10 healthy hypertensive elderly subjects (mean age 80.2 +/- 5.7 years) and in 22 hypertensive elderly subjects (mean age 71.4 +/- 5.0 years) treated with antihypertensive medication (diuretics, beta-blockers, vasodilators). In the three groups there was a fall of mean arterial blood pressure of 9.3 +/- 1.9%, 13.8 +/- 1.9% and 7.9 +/- 1.3%, respectively, at 40 min after the start of the breakfast. In all three groups heart rate increased significantly. It is concluded that antihypertensive treatment with the regimens used in this study does not induce an additional fall of blood pressure postprandially. However, the influence of eating should be avoided in the assessment of antihypertensive drug effects in the elderly.     

Home blood pressure measurements associated with better blood pressure control: the J-HOME study

The usefulness of self-measurements of blood pressure (BP) at home (home BP measurements) in hypertensive patients has been reported by many studies. Several national guidelines recommend the use of home BP measurements to achieve better hypertension control. The objective of this study was to clarify the association between home BP measurements and hypertension treatment among 2363 essential hypertensive patients taking antihypertensive drugs. Compared to the 543 (23.0%) patients who had not taken home BP measurements, the 1820 (77.0%) patients who had taken home BP measurements were significantly older, included a higher proportion of males, included a higher proportion with a family history of hypertension, took a greater number of antihypertensive drugs and alpha blockers and took antihypertensive drugs more often in the evening. Home BP measurements were associated with significantly better control of home and office BP levels. Compared to patients who had not taken home BP measurements, the adjusted odds ratios for good control of morning home BPs, evening home BPs and office BPs in patients who had taken home BP measurements were 1.46 (95% confidential interval (CI) 1.33-1.57), 1.35 (95% CI 1.21-1.47) and 1.23 (95% CI 1.06-1.37), respectively. Home BP measurements were associated with good hypertensive management. Our findings suggest that it is important that physicians recommend home BP measurements to their patients.     

Antihypertensive medication adherence and blood pressure control among central Alabama veterans

Medication nonadherence is associated with adverse outcomes. To evaluate antihypertensive medication adherence and its association with blood pressure (BP) control, the authors described population adherence to prescribed antihypertensive medication (proportion of days covered ≥80%) and BP control (mean BP <140/90 mm Hg) among central Alabama veterans during the fiscal year 2015. Overall, 75.1% of patients receiving antihypertensive medication were considered adherent, and 66.1% had adequate BP control. Patients adherent to antihypertensive medication were more likely to have adequate BP control compared with patients classified as nonadherent (67.4% vs 62.0%; adjusted odds ratio 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.22–1.44 [P<.0001]). Among patients who had uncontrolled BP, 73.6% were considered adherent to medication. Adherence to antihypertensive medication was associated with adequate BP control; however, a substantial proportion of patients with inadequate BP control were also considered adherent. Interventions to increase BP control could address more aggressive medication management to achieve BP goals.     

Risers and extreme-dippers of nocturnal blood pressure in hypertension: antihypertensive strategy for nocturnal blood pressure

There is increasing evidence that disruption of diurnal blood pressure (BP) variation is a risk factor for hypertensive target organ damage and cardiovascular events. Especially, the risers (extreme non-dippers), who exhibit a nocturnal BP increase compared with daytime BP, have the worst cardiovascular prognosis, both for stroke and cardiac events. On the other hand, extreme-dippers (with marked nocturnal BP falls) are at risk for non-fatal ischemic stroke and silent myocardial ischemia, particularly extreme-dippers complicated with atherosclerotic arterial stenosis and excessive BP reduction due to antihypertensive medication. Extreme-dipping status of nocturnal BP is closely associated with excessive morning BP surge and orthostatic hypertension. Hypertensive patients who have these conditions and exhibit marked BP variations are likely to have silent cerebral infarct and to be at high-risk with regard to future stroke. Individualized antihypertensive medication targeting disrupted diurnal BP variation might thus be beneficial for such high-risk hypertensive patients.     

Application of guidelines concerning systolic hypertension in patients over 80 years of age: experience in a geriatric institute

Application of the guidelines concerning systolic hypertension in patients over 80 years of age: experience in a geriatric institute In order to compare the blood pressures of elderly hypertensive patients treated in accordance with recent guidelines, the authors measured the casual blood pressure of a population of long stay patients. Recent data from the FRAMINGHAM HEART STUDY shows that, in the general population, only 23% of women over 80 years of age attained the target values, a blood pressure less than 140/90 mmHg, and only 35% of those treated for hypertension. Eighty patients in the long stay unit of Allauch Hospital were studied in this transverse study performed from the 23rd to 25th of August 2005. The blood pressure (SBP, DBP and PP) and heart rate at consultation were measured by the same physician with the same sphygmomanometer (OMRON M4). The prescribed antihypertensive medication was noted; the presence of atrial fibrillation and the echocardiographic data including left atrial (LA) diameter in M-mode were also included. Forty-four of the 80 patients included were hypertensive (84% women, average age 88.7 years; 16% men, average age 86 years) and treated with the same objective of blood pressure (BP < 140/90 mmHg). The patients were treated by monotherapy in 6% of cases, bitherapy in 27% of cases, tritherapy in 6.8% of cases, and quadritherapy in 4.5% of cases. The distribution of antihypertensive agents in the patients over 80 years of age was almost identical to that of the ninety years of age group. The target blood pressure was attained in 67.5% of women and 71.5% of men. The incidence of atrial fibrillation in the hypertensive patients over 80 years of age was 32%, and 85.7% of them had dilated left atrium (>40 mm). The authors conclude that target blood pressures were more often attained (68% vs. 35%) in this Geriatric Institute than in the American general population probably because of environmental and motivational reasons, including those of the medical staff.     

Baseline Characteristics and Early Blood Pressure Control in the CONVINCE Trial

-Blood pressure (BP) control rates around the world are suboptimal. Part 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Educational Survey (NHANES) III indicates that only 27.4% of hypertensive Americans aged 18 to 74 years have a BP of <140/90 mm Hg. We wanted to assess BP control during the first 2 years and to describe the baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of Cardiovascular Endpoints (CONVINCE) Study, an international clinical trial that compares outcomes in hypertensive patients randomized to initial treatment with either controlled-onset extended-release verapamil or the investigator's choice of atenolol or hydrochlorothiazide. At randomization, BP was <140/90 mm Hg in only 20.3% of the 16 602 subjects (average+/-SD age 65.6+/-7.4 years; 56% women, 84% white/7% black/7% Hispanic). The average BP at enrollment was 148/85 mm Hg for patients taking BP medications (n=13 879) and 161/94 mm Hg for previously untreated patients (n=2723). After medication titration, with a transtelephonic computer that recommended an increase in the dose or number of antihypertensive agents whenever the BP was 140/90 mm Hg, 84.8% of the subjects attained the goal BP. During 2 years of treatment, BP control was maintained in 67% to 69% of the subjects (69% to 71% for systolic BP of <140 mm Hg and 90% for diastolic BP of <90 mm Hg). These data suggest that the control of systolic BP is more difficult than the control of diastolic BP. The US national goal of having 50% of hypertensives with a BP of <140/90 mm Hg may be achievable if a forced titration strategy is used. Interested investigators, free care and medications, and well-educated subjects may make the attainment of such a goal easier in the CONVINCE study than in the general population.