Tumor lysis syndrome in a patient with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma

A first course of combination chemotherapy for large volume metastatic disease in a patient with Merkel cell carcinoma resulted in a tumor lysis syndrome. After this course a nearly complete response was documented. This case report extends further the chemosensitivity of Merkel cell carcinoma and demonstrates the need for tumor lysis syndrome prophylaxis in patients with bulky disease or fast-growing tumors.     

Fatal acute tumor lysis syndrome with metastatic breast carcinoma

A 53-year-old woman presented with an extensively metastatic and rapidly growing breast adenocarcinoma, markedly elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and mildly elevated blood urea nitrogen. She received 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide. Eighteen hours after chemotherapy she was noted to have hyperuricemia, hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia, and acute renal failure. She experienced cardiac arrest and died 72 hours after receiving chemotherapy. A postmortem liver biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma undergoing necrosis. This case represented the acute tumor lysis syndrome that occurred after chemotherapy of breast carcinoma. Patients with metastatic breast carcinoma and similar presentations should be considered for prophylactic therapy with allopurinol and hydration before chemotherapy.     

Clinical and economic benefits of irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

The combination of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid has clinical and survival benefits over 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid alone in the setting of first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of this cost-effectiveness analysis was to compare the economic implications, from a UK health commissioner perspective, of the two treatment arms (de Gramont regimen) in this setting. Resource utilisation data collected prospectively during the study were used as a basis for estimating cumulative drug dosage, chemotherapy administration, and treatment of complications during first line therapy. Resource utilisation associated with further chemotherapy in patients who had progressed during the study was derived from a retrospective case note review. Drug acquisition costs were derived from the British National Formulary (September, 2001) and unit costs for clinical consultation and services were taken from the latest relevant cost database. Cumulative costs per patient associated with further chemotherapy were lower in the irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid treatment arm. Based on incremental costs per life-year gained of 14 794 pounds sterling, the combination of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid can be considered cost-effective by commonly accepted criteria compared with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid alone. Thus, clinical and economic data demonstrate that irinotecan, either in combination with irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in the first line setting or as monotherapy in the second line setting, has a major role in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Tumor lysis syndrome after treatment with gemcitabine for metastatic transitional cell carcinoma

Tumor lysis syndrome is a set of life threatening complication that can arise from treatment of high tumor burden, drug sensitive, and rapidly proliferating neoplasm particularly of hematological origin. It is rarely described in patients with solid tumors. We report the first case of tumor lysis syndrome in a man with metastatic renal pelvic transitional cell carcinoma after gemcitabine treatment. Despite aggressive therapy, he died 2 weeks after TLS was diagnosed. Our experience demonstrates that administration of gemcitabine for metastatic renal pelvic transitional cell carcinoma may induce acute tumor lysis syndrome, which necessitates frequent laboratory monitoring and prompt initiation of appropriate therapeutic measures.     

Efficacy and safety of an irinotecan plus bolus 5-fluorouracil and L-leucovorin regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer in Japanese patients: experience in a single institution in Japan

BACKGROUND: Short-term infusion of 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin has been considered as standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, until infusion of 5-fluorouracil regimens and oxaliplatin was approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan early in 2005, combination of irinotecan with bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin had been the standard treatment. This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a modified irinotecan with bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimen in Japanese colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: Forty-six patients untreated with chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer received a modified form of the irinotecan with bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimen, consisting of intravenous irinotecan (100 mg/m2) and l-leucovorin (10 mg/m2), and then 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus infusion, weekly for 4 weeks, repeated every 6 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 48% (95% confidence interval, 34-62%), and 48% of patients had stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 8.3 months and overall survival was 20.3 months. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxicity was as follows: neutropenia, 50%; diarrhea, 4%; fatigue, 13%; nausea, 7%; and vomiting, 7%. Neither treatment-related nor all-cause mortality occurred within 60 days of chemotherapy initiation. Despite the limited availability of oxaliplatin, 29 patients received an oxaliplatin-based regimen after progression. CONCLUSION: A modified irinotecan plus bolus 5-fluorouracil/l-leucovorin regimen was an active and well-tolerated regimen in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer, showing a different toxicity profile from Western patients.     

Drug Insight: Metastatic colorectal cancer--oral fluoropyrimidines and new perspectives in the adjuvant setting

Capecitabine and uracil/ftorafur (UFT) are prodrugs of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) that can be administered orally. Both drugs have been shown to be as effective as bolus 5-FU and folinic acid (FA), both as adjuvant treatment, and for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. However, as the addition of oxaliplatin to 5-FU has been shown to improve disease-free survival in adjuvant therapy, oxaliplatin/5-FU is currently regarded as the standard adjuvant treatment, rather than fluoropyrimidine monotherapy. For the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, improved response rates and prolonged survival have been reported when irinotecan or oxaliplatin was added to 5-FU/FA; a further increase in efficacy was shown when bevacizumab, an antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, was added to chemotherapy. Studies investigating the substitution of infusional 5-FU with oral compounds in combination therapy (e.g. FOLFOX versus capecitabine/oxaliplatin) are ongoing, but preliminary results in metastatic patients advise caution because of increased toxicity when used with irinotecan, and statistically non-significant trends of a decreased efficacy when used with oxaliplatin. Therefore, the combined use of oral 5-FU prodrugs plus irinotecan or oxaliplatin is not recommended at present. Oral 5-FU prodrugs, however, offer a convenient and less toxic treatment option in adjuvant treatment and in the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma in patients who do not want an intensified regimen, those that have contraindications for implanted venous access devices, and those who are not candidates for a combination therapy with irinotecan and oxaliplatin.     

Contradictory KRAS mutation test results in a patient with metastatic colon cancer: A clinical dilemma in the era of personalized medicine

The KRAS oncogene is mutated in 40‒50% of colorectal cancers and confers resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy. In the clinic, agents such as cetuximab or panitumumab target the EGFR receptor for therapeutic benefit. Cetuximab was approved by the FDA in 2012 as first-line therapy for KRAS mutation-negative (wild-type), EGFR-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer, in combination with FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, leucovorin). Herein we report a case of metastatic colon cancer with conflicting testing results for the KRAS oncogene from two different reference laboratories. The discordant reports complicated the decision-making process regarding the administration of targeted anti-EGFR personalized therapy. As the second test result was wild-type from the same original pathological specimen, the patient was treated with cetuximab-containing combination chemotherapy and appeared to have a response after prior disease progression. It is unclear whether the observed response was fully due to regression of wild-type KRAS-containing tumor or any component of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity to a heterogeneous tumor in this patient.     

Current status of second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

Decisions regarding the optimal systemic therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) have become more complex with the identification and development of multiple effective agents for this disease. Multiple treatment options are now available in the second-line setting for patients with metastatic CRC who have progressed despite prior chemotherapy. The exact choice of second-line therapy depends on the first-line treatment that was administered. Irinotecan as a salvage therapy for patients with metastatic CRC who have progression following front-line 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based therapies was confirmed in a number of phase II/III studies. Many patients who received irinotecan/5-FU-based therapy as first-line treatment benefit from the combination of oxaliplatin and 5-FU/leucovorin (FOLFOX) in terms of response, time to progression, and relief of tumor-related symptoms. Other considerations include the integration of targeted therapies into chemotherapy regimens. The results of a randomized phase II trial have demonstrated that the addition of cetuximab to irinotecan in patients with irinotecan-resistant tumors represents another active treatment option for these patients. The activity of bevacizumab as part of second-line therapy is currently under investigation and results from phase III trials are expected within the next year. In summary, the availability of 5 drugs that are active in CRC provides us, for the first time, with choice--and dilemma--regarding optimal second-line therapy in patients with metastatic CRC.     

Severe spontaneous acute tumor lysis syndrome and hypoglycemia in patient with germ cell tumor

Tumor lysis syndrome has been observed in patients with bulky, treatment-sensitive tumors, in particular hematological malignancies, especially after medical treatment (chemotherapy, corticosteroids, radiation, hormonal agents, and biological response modifiers). Tumor lysis syndrome has been observed also in solid malignancies and it very rarely occurs spontaneously. Tumor lysis syndrome-associated metabolic abnormalities include hyperuricemia, hyperphosphatemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia and uremia. Severe hypoglycemia is another rare metabolic disorder, uncommonly associated with solid malignancies. The case described here is peculiar for the abrupt onset of these two rare conditions in a patient with a metastatic germ cell tumor.     

晚期结直肠癌内科治疗进展

晚期转移性结直肠癌的5年生存率低于10％。5-FU／LV方案治疗的中位生存期大约12个月。最近化疗方案的更新延长了患者的中位生存期。研究发现奥沙利铂、伊立替康联合5-FU／LV或者卡培他滨等化疗方案使中位生存期延长到20个月。奥沙利铂，伊立替康联合5-FU／LV比传统的单药5-FU／LV使生活质量改善时间延长。目前转移性结直肠癌标准的一线治疗方案为FOLFOX和FOLFIRI。正在进行的研究关注新的分子靶向药物（molecular targeted therapy）联合化疗治疗转移性结直肠癌，且部分试验取得了较好的疗效。本文将对5-FU、新一代化疗药物以及分子靶向药物在转移性结肠癌治疗的演进及新进展作一综述。     

Immunotherapy with dendritic cells and CpG oligonucleotides can be combined with chemotherapy without loss of efficacy in a mouse model of colon cancer

Although immunotherapy has shown promising results in the treatment of cancer, clinical studies assessing immunologic approaches in patients with advanced cancer will seldom be conducted in the absence of conventional treatment strategies such as chemotherapy. Here we investigate the combination of chemotherapy with CpG oligonucleotide and dendritic cell-based immunotherapy in the C26 mouse model of colon carcinoma. The coinjection of antigen-pulsed, mature dendritic cells and CpG oligonucleotides together with a peritumoral injection of CpG oligonucleotides elicits a CD8 T-cell response resulting in tumor rejection and long-term protection in the C26 model. Tumor-bearing mice were treated weekly for 4 weeks by this immunotherapy protocol, by 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin or irinotecan, or by the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. We observed that immunotherapy was more effective in reducing tumor growth and increasing survival than 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan. Immunotherapy was well tolerated, whereas therapeutic doses of 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan were associated with dose-limiting toxicity. Furthermore, the efficacy of immunotherapy combined with either 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan was similar to that of immunotherapy alone. Addition of immunotherapy to either 5-fluorouracil or irinotecan treatment strongly decreased the toxicity of chemotherapy. Immunotherapy both with and without chemotherapy generated a memory immune response, leading to tumor rejection in mice rechallenged with C26 tumor cells up to several months after treatment. In summary, immunotherapy with a combination of dendritic cells and CpG oligonucleotides is superior to chemotherapy in the C26 tumor model. This immunotherapy protocol can be combined with current chemotherapy agents with no loss in therapeutic activity.     

Targeted therapy of colorectal cancer: clinical experience with bevacizumab

Advanced colorectal cancer remains an urgent health concern, despite improvements in systemic chemotherapy. Targeted therapeutics promise effective tumor therapy with minimal side effects. Angiogenesis (the formation of new blood vessels) is essential for tumor growth and metastasis and may be an ideal target in the search for new antineoplastic agents. Vascular endothelial growth factor is one of the best characterized of the proangiogenic growth factors that regulate angiogenesis and is a logical target in colorectal cancer therapy. Bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech Inc.; South San Francisco, CA), a humanized murine monoclonal antibody directed at vascular endothelial growth factor, is being evaluated in the treatment of various types of cancer. It has shown promising efficacy in phase II clinical trials in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Addition of bevacizumab at a dose of 5 mg/kg to chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin) resulted in a higher objective response rate (40% versus 17%), longer time to disease progression (9.0 versus 5.2 months), and longer median survival time (21.5 versus 13.8 months). Hypertension and thrombosis were the principal safety concerns, but were manageable. Further phase II/III studies of bevacizumab, administered with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin, with or without irinotecan and/or oxaliplatin, in colorectal cancer, are under way.     

Triplet Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Toward the Best Way to Safely Administer a Highly Active Regimen in Clinical Practice

A major problem concerning the addition of more drugs in a chemotherapy combination is designing a proper schedule assuring the balance between dose intensity of each drug, efficacy of the combination, and tolerability lessening the burden of drug toxicity. We evaluated triplet chemotherapy-based intensive regimens proposed as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Using a FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) combination regimen, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer now have the possibility of longer survival, but disappointingly, with increased toxicities. Triplet chemotherapy regimen according to 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan /5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, characterized by timed flat-infusion 5-FU administration, without leucovorin, obtained efficacy equivalent to other reported similar combination regimens (5-FU, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin), with increased received 5-FU dose intensity and lower grade 3 to 4 neutropenia. To guarantee the proper balance between dose intensities, efficacy, and toxicity, triplet chemotherapy schedules could be further improved by abrogation of folinic acid and bolus 5-FU, a new and easy modality of 5-FU administration, such as timed flat-infusion 5-FU, associated with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin; this could favor diffusion of this intensive treatment in clinical practice.     

Concurrent proton beam radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy for the metastatic liver tumor of gastric carcinoma: a case report

We report a case of a woman with a metastatic liver tumor from gastric carcinoma, who has been successfully treated with concurrent proton beam therapy and systemic chemotherapy. A 76-year-old woman underwent distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for advanced gastric carcinoma on January 17, 2002. She received five courses of sequential chemotherapy with methotrexate-5-fluorouracil after the surgical resection. A metastatic liver tumor was detected in the caudate lobe of the liver by computed tomography at 6 months after the surgical resection. We employed concurrent proton beam therapy and systemic chemotherapy which consisted of 5-fluorouracil (250 mg/body per day, as a 24-h intravenous injection for 4 weeks) and low dose cisplatin (10 mg/body on days 1-5 every week for 4 weeks). Proton beam therapy targeting the metastatic liver tumor was performed in a daily fraction of 3 Gy, 5 days per week, with a total dose of 66 Gy over 30 days. The tumor disappeared 3 months after the treatment and no recurrence has been observed for 2 years after termination of the treatment. Throughout the entire course of treatment, the patient received injections of granulocyte stimulating factor subcutaneously for grade 3 leukopenia. She never complained of abdominal symptoms, such as epigastralgia, nausea or diarrhea. Liver failure related to proton irradiation has not been observed. This concurrent proton beam radiotherapy with systemic chemotherapy could be an effective treatment modality for metastatic liver tumor from gastric carcinoma.     

Perspectives on the role of sequential or combination chemotherapy for first-line and salvage therapy in advanced colorectal cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality. Surgical resection of all known metastatic disease can be curative in selected patients. The majority of patients, however, require the consideration of systemic chemotherapy as optimal palliative treatment for their diseases. Using new effective chemotherapeutic agents such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin has resulted in a clear and clinically significant improvement in survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The optimal sequences and combinations of these agents as initial and salvage chemotherapy along with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin are controversial. It seems clear that it is important for all patients to have access to all 3 drugs at some point in their therapy for optimal results. Recent randomized trials of first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer in which patients were likely to have access to all 3 effective drugs demonstrated median survivals of 18-20 months. This compares favorably to median survivals of approximately 12 months for patients treated with 5-FU-based regimens alone prior to the availability of effective salvage therapy. A small but meaningful number of patients might develop resectable disease with curative intent as the result of significant tumor response to combination chemotherapy. Herein, we review recent developments in combination and sequential chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer and the implications for the optimal treatment in these patients.     

Outpatient therapy with irinotecan and low-dose cisplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to 5-fluorouracil

Chemotherapy with irinotecan hydrochloride and low-dose cisplatin was tested for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer showing resistance to 5-fluorouracil. Eleven consecutive patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer (performance status: 0 to 2), who had shown tumor progression on chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, were treated with irinotecan (60 mg/m2) plus cisplatin (6 mg/m2) by 90-min intravenous infusion. Treatment was repeated weekly for 3 weeks during admission and then fortnightly on an outpatient basis. Objective responses were observed in four patients (36%; 95% confidence interval: 11%-69%). The median duration of response was 5.5 months and six patients are still alive. The time to disease progression was longer in the no change group (7.0+/-3.6 months: mean +/- SD) than in the responder group (5.5+/-1.9 months), and there was no difference of median survival between the two groups (10.0 versus 10.3 months). The overall median survival was 8.2 months (range: 4 to 12+ months). This treatment was well tolerated. Six patients experienced grade 1 or 2 leucopenia, while grade I diarrhea and nausea occurred in three and five patients, respectively. Based on the good response, excellent quality of life, and convenience, the present regimen seems to be reasonable second-line outpatient chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer showing resistance to 5-fluorouracil.     

Phase II trial of capecitabine/irinotecan and capecitabine/oxaliplatin in advanced gastrointestinal cancers

Combination protocols of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) plus irinotecan or oxaliplatin have demonstrated high activity in metastatic colorectal cancer. Capecitabine, an oral 5-FU prodrug, may replace infusional 5-FU/LV in combination protocols with irinotecan or oxaliplatin. We therefore initiated a phase II study with capecitabine plus either irinotecan or oxaliplatin to determine the efficacy and toxicity of specific combination protocols in patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. Capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) taken orally twice a day on days 1-14, plus oxaliplatin 70 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, or irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8; repeated every 3 weeks in an outpatient setting. Patient and tumor characteristics were as follows: median age, 68 years (range, 34-77 years); sex: 10 women, 33 men; tumor types: 35 colorectal cancer; 8 other GI tumors including 5 gastric, 2 pancreatic, and 1 duodenal cancer. All 43 patients treated were evaluable for toxicity (capecitabine/oxaliplatin, 24 patients; capecitabine/irinotecan, 19 patients), and 39 were evaluable for efficacy (capecitabine/oxaliplatin, 22; capecitabine/irinotecan, 17). Grade 3/4 toxicities (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Version 2.0) were limited to diarrhea, 9 patients (capecitabine/irinotecan, n = 5; capecitabine/oxaliplatin, n = 4); hand-foot syndrome, 1 patient (capecitabine/irinotecan); nausea, 2 patients (capecitabine/oxaliplatin); vomiting, 1 patient (capecitabine/oxaliplatin); and peripheral neuropathy, 1 patient (capecitabine/oxaliplatin). No grade 3/4 myelosuppression was noted for either protocol. Capecitabine/irinotecan and capecitabine/oxaliplatin demonstrated significant clinical activity in colorectal cancer and other GI cancers as first-line and salvage therapy. Capecitabine/oxaliplatin and capecitabine/irinotecan show an excellent safety profile and clinical activity in colorectal cancer and other advanced GI tumors. The main toxicity in both arms was manageable diarrhea. This trial served as basis for a randomized multicenter phase II study comparing capecitabine/oxaliplatin and capecitabine/irinotecan as first-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.     

Irinotecan in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: improved survival and cost-effect compared with infusional 5-FU

In a recent multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label study (Rougier and colleagues, Lancet 1998, 352, 1407-1412), irinotecan significantly increased survival without any deterioration in quality of life compared with best-estimated infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) therapy in the setting of second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the cost-effectiveness analysis reported here was to compare the economic implications, from a U.K. perspective, of replacing 5-FU therapy [either as a single agent (Lokich regimen, B2) or in combination with folinic acid (de Gramont regimen, B1, or AIO regimen, B3)] with irinotecan as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Resource utilisation data collected prospectively during the study, supplemented by both a questionnaire to investigators and local expert clinical opinion, were used as a basis for estimating cumulative drug dosage, chemotherapy administration and treatment of complications. Drug acquisition costs were derived from the British National Formulary (March 1998), and unit costs for clinical consultation and services were derived from relevant 1996/1997 cost databases. Although cumulative drug acquisition costs per patient were higher with irinotecan than with infusional 5-FU therapy, these were at least partially offset by lower cumulative costs per patient associated with administration of therapy and treatment of complications in the irinotecan arm than in the 5-FU arm. Based on the incremental costs per life year gained (LYG), irinotecan was considered to be cost-effective by commonly accepted criteria compared with either the B1 or B2 regimens. Irinotecan was cost-saving compared with the B3 regimen (that is significant survival gain and a reduction in costs). Thus, not only is there strong evidence for the use of irinotecan as standard second-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer,but the results of this prospective economic evaluation have shown that irinotecan also represents good value for money in this clinical setting.     

A case of heavily pretreated rectal cancer with disseminated intravascular coagulation that improved following reintroduction of FOLFOX plus bevacizumab

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a complication that may be experienced by patients with solid tumors. The prognosis of solid tumors with DIC is much poorer than those without DIC. Although treatment of the underlying disease is critical for improvement of DIC, the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy in patients with DIC associated with colorectal cancer are not clear. A 50-year-old man with advanced rectal cancer and multiple liver metastases experienced DIC during third-line treatment with cetuximab plus irinotecan, following 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) plus bevacizumab and 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab. Combination chemotherapy consisting of FOLFOX plus bevacizumab was reintroduced. Although platelet and fresh-frozen plasma transfusions were required daily before chemotherapy, the patient’s laboratory values improved after two cycles of chemotherapy, without severe toxicity. The patient was discharged, and FOLFOX plus bevacizumab has been continued on an outpatient basis without sign of recurrence of DIC as of December 2010 (4 months after initiation of chemotherapy). This case suggests that reintroduction of combination chemotherapy with FOLFOX plus bevacizumab is effective and feasible in patients with colorectal cancer with DIC and that chemotherapy may be a treatment option for such patients.     

Developments in combination chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

In the last 5 years, major advances have occurred in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Following a period of over 30 years in which 5-fluorouracil was the only proven treatment for colorectal cancer, survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer has nearly doubled following the introduction of irinotecan (Campto, Aventis) and oxaliplatin (Eloxatin, Sanofi-Synthelabo). Furthermore, recent studies have demonstrated additional improvements in response and survival when combination chemotherapy drugs are administered with biologic agents that target angiogenesis and tumor growth pathways. The benefit of these newer drugs is now being realized in the adjuvant setting, where the addition of oxaliplatin to infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovrin has led to improvements in disease-free survival. Further adjuvant studies are testing the benefit of the addition of biologic therapies to oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based combination chemotherapy.