The cardiovascular aspect of COVID-19

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), an infectious disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2), has hit the world very hard by affecting millions of people across countries hence posing a major health threat on a global scale. This novel virus is thought to enter and cause infection in its host through the attachment of its structural protein known as the S-glycoprotein to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Given the rapid spread of COVID-19 with its consequences globally, it is mandatory that health caregivers and researchers across all disciplines abreast themselves with the potential effects that this novel virus may have on their fields and the medical society at large. During the infection, the cardiovascular system is affected by unknown pathomechanistic processes, hence accounting for an increased prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) among COVID-19 patients. As cardiovascular researchers, we are more concerned about the cardiovascular aspect of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19. Hence, this concise review addresses these aspects where CVD as a risk factor of COVID-19, the prevalence of CVDs in COVID-19, and the potential cardiovascular disorders which may evolve owing to COVID-19 are discussed. A better understanding of these issues will be pivotal to improve cardiovascular health during this SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.     

SARS-CoV-2 antibody changes in patients receiving COVID-19 convalescent plasma from normal and vaccinated donors

Vaccination has been shown to stimulate remarkably high antibody levels in donors who have recovered from COVID-19. Our objective was to measure patient antibody levels before and after transfusion with COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma (CCP) and compare the antibody levels following transfusion of CCP from vaccinated and nonvaccinated donors. Plasma samples before and after transfusion were obtained from 25 recipients of CCP and COVID-19 antibody levels measured. Factors that effect changes in antibody levels were examined. In the 21 patients who received CCP from nonvaccinated donors, modest increases in antibody levels were observed. Patients who received two units were more likely to seroconvert than those receiving just one unit. The strongest predictor of changes in patient antibody level was the CCP dose, calculated by the unit volume multiplied by the donor antibody level. Using patient plasma volume and donor antibody level, the post-transfusion antibody level could be predicted with reasonable accuracy(R²> 0.90). In contrast, the 4 patients who received CCP from vaccinated donors all had dramatic increases in antibody levels following transfusion of a single unit. In this subset of recipients, antibody levels observed after transfusion of CCP were comparable to those seen in donors who had fully recovered from COVID-19. If available, CCP from vaccinated donors with very high antibody levels should be used. One unit of CCP from vaccinated donors increases patient antibody levels much more than 1 or 2 units of CCP from unvaccinated donors.     

COVID-19 pandemic and exacerbation of ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUNDIn 2020, the world faced the unprecedented crisis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Besides the infection and its consequences, COVID-19 also resulted in anxiety and stress resulting from severe restrictions on economic and social activities, including for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Fresh acute stress exerts stronger influences than continuous stress on UC patients. We therefore hypothesized that the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic would have serious effects on UC patients and performed this retrospective control study.AIMTo determine whether the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic would have serious effects on UC patients included in a retrospective controlled study.METHODSA total of 289 consecutive UC outpatients seen in March and April 2020 were included in this study. Modified UC disease activity index (UC-DAI) scores on the day of entry and at the previous visit were compared. An increase of ≥ 2 was considered to indicate exacerbation. The exacerbation rate was also compared with that in 256 consecutive control patients independently included in the study from the same period of the previous year in the same manner.RESULTSNo significant differences in patient characteristics or pharmacotherapies before entry were seen between the groups. Mean UC-DAI score was significantly higher in subjects during the first wave of COVID-19 (0.67 + 0.07) compared to the previous visit (0.26 + 0.04; P = 0.0000). The exacerbation rate was significantly increased during the first wave of COVID-19, as compared with the previous year (15.9% [46/289] vs 8.9% [23/256]; P = 0.0151).CONCLUSIONThis study demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic caused exacerbations in UC patients, probably through psychological and physical stress.     

A fatal case of COVID-19-associated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis

A 79-year-old Japanese man with polymyalgia rheumatica was admitted to hospital with coronavirus disease (COVID-19). On admission, he was treated with ciclesonide inhalation, ivermectin, and meropenem. He was intubated 6 days after admission, and methylprednisolone therapy was initiated (1000 mg/day). Hypoxemia and chest radiographic findings temporarily improved. However, chest computed tomography showed bilateral ground-glass attenuations, multiple nodules, and consolidation. Aspergillus fumigatus was cultured from the tracheal aspirate and he was diagnosed with COVID-19-associated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) and treated with liposomal amphotericin B. However, he died 28 days after admission.     

Special features of SARS-CoV-2 in daily practice

The severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (commonly known as SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus (designated as 2019-nCoV), which was isolated for the first time after the Chinese health authorities reported a cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China in December 2019. Optimal management of the Coronavirus Disease-2019 disease is evolving quickly and treatment guidelines, based on scientific evidence and experts’ opinions with clinical experience, are constantly being updated. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak as a "Public Health Emergency of International Concern". The total lack of immune protection brought about a severe spread of the contagion all over the world. For this reason, diagnostic tools, patient management and therapeutic approaches have been tested along the way, in the desperate race to break free from the widespread infection and its fatal respiratory complications. Current medical knowledge and research on severe and critical patients’ management and experimental treatments are still evolving, but several protocols on minimizing risk of infection among the general population, patients and healthcare workers have been approved and diffused by International Health Authorities.     

Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 panel,a rapid multiplex PCR method for the diagnosis of COVID-19

IntroductionRapid, simple, and accurate methods are required to diagnose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel (QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2), a rapid multiplex PCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection.MethodsNasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) that were obtained from patients with COVID-19 who were diagnosed at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine were used in this study. When the NPS samples were found to be negative for SARS-CoV-2 after treatment, they were used as negative samples. We evaluated the performance of the QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 comparing SARS-CoV-2 detection with the National Institute of Infectious Diseases in Japan-recommended real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method (NIID-RT-PCR).ResultsIn total, 45 NPS samples were analyzed. The proportion of overall agreement between QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 and NIID-RT-PCR on 45 samples was 91.0% with a sensitivity of 84.0% (21/25), specificity at 100% (20/20), negative predictive value at 83.3% (20/24), and positive predictive value at 100% (21/21). There were no patients with co-infections with pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2.ConclusionsQIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 showed a high agreement in comparison with the NIID-RT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The QIAstat-SARS-CoV-2 also provided a rapid and accurate diagnosis for COVID-19, even when the concurrent detection of other respiratory pathogens was desired, and therefore, has the potential to direct appropriate therapy and infection control precautions.     

Clinical application of SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection and monoclonal antibody therapies against COVID-19

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical application of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus-2(SARS-CoV-2) specific antibody detection and anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific monoclonal antibodies(m Abs) in the treatment of coronavirus infectious disease 2019(COVID-19). The dynamic changes of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies during COVID-19 were studied. Immunoglobulin M(Ig M) appeared earlier and lasted for a short time, while immunoglobulin G(Ig G) appeared later and last...     

新型冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2基因检测及其影像学对照

目的研究新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)核酸基因检测及其影像学对照。方法实时荧光RT-PCR方法检测SARS-CoV-2 ORF1a/b和N基因,分析23例SARS-CoV-2核酸阳性患者临床及影像学资料。结果①无症状感染者3例,COVID-19确诊20例,潜伏期2~24天,成人轻型5例,儿童轻型1例,青年轻型1例,成年普通型13例。②23例SARS-CoV-2基因阳性患者,痰标本的病毒含量和检测效果高于鼻咽拭子标本,N基因粪便比痰和鼻咽拭子阳性持续时间长。③20例COVID-19中,30.0%(6/20)CT扫描未见异常。病毒载量与影像学无正比对应关系。④发病部位以外周带(13/14)和下叶后基底段(11/14)多见,两个或多个肺叶受累(11/14),双侧病变(11/14)。⑤14例CT异常COVID-19中,影像学主要表现为毛玻璃影(10/14)、双肺斑片状阴影(10/14)、晕征(8/14)、细网格征(5/14),以及伴发小叶间隔增厚(5/14)、支气管充气征(5/14)和小血管增粗影(5/14)。结论病毒载量与影像学无正比对应关系,SARS-CoV-2核酸检测联合CT扫描、流行病学史可以提高COVID-19的检出率,不能孤立仅仅依靠核酸PCR检查或CT检查。     

A SARS-CoV-2 targeted siRNA-nanoparticle therapy for COVID-19

1. Download : Download high-res image (156KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Human inhalable antibody fragments neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 variants for COVID-19 therapy

1. Download : Download high-res image (238KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Gastroenterology and liver disease during COVID-19 and in anticipation of post-COVID-19 era: Current practice and future directions

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as a major threat to global public health. The virus causes the clinical syndrome known as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), in which multiple organs can get affected. Apart from manifestations of the respiratory system, which predominate, its clinical presentation is frequently accompanied by symptoms of the gastro-intestinal (GI) tract and liver abnormalities. The correlation of symptoms and abnormalities with disease severity is discussed, leading to ambiguous results from international literature. Moreover, the disease infects patients with co-existing liver and GI disorders affecting both their health status and the availability of healthcare services provided to them. The risk of transmission of the disease during aerosol-generating procedures has changed the diagnostic approach and follow-up algorithms for liver and GI diseases. For the safety of both doctors and patients, telemedicine and distant evaluation have become everyday practice, whereas several routines and emergency visits at outpatient and emergency departments have been postponed or delayed. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is underway, providing hope to humanity and the expectation that the post-COVID-19 era is near. This review aims to update knowledge about the manifestations of COVID-19 related to liver and GI diseases and the effect of the pandemic on the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for these diseases with a special focus on how current practices have changed and what changes will possibly remain in the future.