A phase III comparison of high dose ARA-C (HIDAC) versus HIDAC plus mitoxantrone in the treatment of first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia Southwest Oncology Group Study.

The aim of this study is to determine whether the addition of mitoxantrone to high dose cytarabine improves the outcome of treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). One hundred and sixty-two eligible patients, 14-76 years of age, with AML either in first relapse or that failed to respond to initial remission induction therapy, with no CNS involvement were randomized to receive therapy with cytarabine 3 gm/M2 i.v. over 2 h every 12 h for 12 doses on days 1-6 (Arm I) (HIDAC); or HIDAC plus mitoxantrone 10 mg/M2 i.v. daily on days 7 9 (Arm II) (HIDAC + M). Patients achieving complete remission were treated with three courses of consolidation including HIDAC (Ara-C 3 gm/M2 i.v. 12 h days 1 3; 2 gm/M2 over age 50) alone (ARM I) or with mitoxantrone (10 mg/M2 i.v. day 1) (ARM II). Among 162 patients (81 HIDAC, 81 HIDAC + M) evaluated for induction toxicity, there were 10 (12%) induction deaths with HIDAC and 13 (17%) with HIDAC + M (2-tailed P = 0.65). Most early deaths were due to infection and/or hemorrhage. Among 162 patients evaluated for responses to induction therapy, 26/81 (32%) HIDAC and 36/81 (44%) HIDAC + M patients achieved complete remission (two-tailed P = 0.15). Although this difference was not statistically significant in univariate analysis, it was after adjusting for the effects of WBC and PMN percentage in multivariate analysis (P=0.013). Median survivals from study entry were 8 months (HIDAC) and 6 months (HIDAC + M); 2-tailed logrank P = 0.58. Among 48 patients registered for consolidation, the median disease-free survivals from that registration were 8 months with HIDAC and 11 months with HIDAC + M (P = 0.60). There were three treatment-related deaths during consolidation (1 HIDAC, 2 HIDAC + M), all due to infections. In this randomized trial, the addition of mitoxantrone to high-dose cytarabine was associated with a trend toward a higher CR rate. There was less evidence for an advantage in disease-free or overall survival, although any such conclusion is limited by the size of the study.     

Homoharringtonine is safe and effective for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia.

Homoharringtonine (HHT) is a cephalotaxine alkaloid with reported efficacy in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). In a phase II trial, we evaluated HHT 5 mg/m2 by continuous infusion daily for 9 days in patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia and blastic phase of chronic myelogenous leukemia (BLCML). Sixty-six patients were entered. There were 40 males and 26 females with a median age of 41 years (range 15-81). Of 43 patients with relapsed AML, seven achieved a complete remission (16%, 95% confidence interval 5%-27%). Although 11 patients with AML primarily resistant to an anthracycline/cytarabine combination did not respond, two of three patients primarily resistant to low-dose cytarabine achieved complete remission. No patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, biphenotypic leukemia, or BLCML responded. Hypotension during the administration of HHT was the most difficult toxicity encountered, requiring multiple interruptions of therapy in several patients and the administration of intravenous saline. Fluid retention and weight gain occurred in 29% of patients. Transient asymptomatic hyperglycemia was observed in 63% of patients. Other toxicity was mild and included nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, mucositis, hepatic dysfunction, and cardiac arrhythmias. As expected, severe myelosuppression occurred in all patients. HHT is well tolerated, but with unique problems associated with administration. It has demonstrable efficacy in pre-treated patients with AML, but its role in the treatment of this disease remains to be defined.     

Postremission therapy with two different dose regimens of cytarabine in adults with acute myelogenous leukemia

Sixty-seven out of 105 (64%) adults with de novo acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), achieving complete remission after induction chemotherapy, entered two successive postremission treatment protocols. Between 1987 and 1989, 35 patients received an intermediate dose of cytarabine (IDAC) along with other drugs. Between 1990 and 1993, 32 patients received high dose cytarabine (HIDAC) with similar other drugs. Patients treated with IDAC had a median survival of 13.8 months (95% Cl 11.2–23.1 months) and a 2 year survival of 34.3 ± 8.0%. Patients receiving HIDAC had a median survival of 35.5 months (95% Cl, lower limit 29.8 months) and a 2 year survival of 71.6 ± 9.4% (P < 0.002). The 2 year actuarial leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 17.8 ± 6.6% in the IDAC group and 67.3 ± 10.0% months in the HIDAC group (P = 0.004). The HIDAC group had a significant 2 year survival advantage over the IDAC group only in patients younger than 45 years. The 2 year survival in the first group was 83.3 ± 10.8% versus 23.5 ± 10.3% in the IDAC group (P = 0.0001). In patients older than 45 years, no significant differences in 2 year survival was noticed (52.9 ± 15.78 versus 44.4 ± 11.7, P = 0.8). Censoring the 21 patients who underwent bone marrow transplantation (BMT) at BMT did not change significantly the survival analysis of the patients in each group. This study is consistent with previous reports favoring HIDAC intensification in the postremission treatment of young patients with AML.     

中/大剂量阿糖胞苷方案序贯化疗后自体造血干细胞移植治疗成年人急性白血病69例分析

 目的 观察第1次完全缓解（CR1）期成年人急性白血病（AL）患者中／大剂量阿糖胞苷（I／HIDAC）序贯强烈化疗后自体造血干细胞移植（ASCT）的安全性及移植疗效。方法 回顾性分析CR1期无HLA匹配同胞供者的成年人AL患者,早期接受I／HIDAC序贯强烈化疗并ASCT治疗。观察其毒副作用、移植相关死亡率（TRM）及总生存率（OS）和无白血病生存率（LFS）等。结果 69例患者接受I／HIDAC强化治疗中位2（1 ~ 3）疗程。患者均发生WHOⅢ ~ Ⅳ级造血系统毒性,常见的非造血系统毒性为胃肠道、皮肤、黏膜毒性、发热及感染等,多为轻微到中等程度。患者均采集到足量的骨髓和／或外周血干细胞。1例预处理后早期死亡,余患者移植后均完全造血重建。中位随访80.5个月,TRM 10.14 %。预期移植后5年OS在AML和ALL分别为（55.36±3.69）%和（56.90±3.56）%,而5年LFS分别为（55.51±3.70）%和（58.09±3.14）%。结论 成年人AL在取得CR1后早期进行以I／HIDAC为基础的强化／巩固治疗后进行ASCT,患者耐受性良好,可获得较好的长期OS和LFS。     

Combination of cytarabine and topotecan in patients treated for acute myeloid leukemia with persistent disease after frontline induction

Abstract After a first course of induction chemotherapy, 30-40% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) do not achieve a complete response (CR). A second course of an anthracycline and intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC) allows a significant number of patients with persistent AML at day 14 to finally achieve a CR. We hypothesized that use of a topotecan and cytarabine combination in this setting might improve tolerance and efficacy. Cytarabine (1000 mg/m(2)/12 h days 1-4) was combined with topotecan (TA, 1.25 mg/m(2)/day by continuous intravenous infusion [CIV] days 1-4) in 31 consecutive patients with ≥?5% marrow blasts by day 14 of induction. The median follow-up was 36 months. The CR rate was 81%, and the 2-year probability of overall survival and cumulative incidence of relapse were 66% and 38%, respectively. No unexpected toxicity was observed. Comparison with historical controls treated with the combination of a similar schedule of cytarabine and an anthracycline showed a better CR rate (p =?0.054), overall survival (p =?0.03) and cumulative incidence of relapse (p =?0.03). These results were confirmed in a multivariate analysis model. This work shows that the substitution of an anthracycline by topotecan is feasible and associated with significant efficacy for patients with AML with persistent leukemia at day 14 after standard-dose anthracycline induction.     

High-dose mitoxantrone in acute leukaemia: New York Medical College experience

Based on promising preclinical data, a progressive series of evaluations of the use of high-dose mitoxantrone-based chemotherapy was initiated in acute leukaemia patients. A preliminary phase I study demonstrated that up to 80 mg/m² of mitoxantrone in combination with cytarabine 3 g/m² daily for 5 days could be given as induction therapy to leukaemic patients with acceptable toxicity. Pharmacokinetic data from these patients demonstrated that high concentrations of mitoxantrone were achievable in vivo to levels that were extremely cytotoxic in vitro. Subsequently, in a phase II study, 45 patients with untreated acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML) under the age of 60 received mitoxantrone 80 mg/m² in combination with cytarabine 3 g/m² daily for 5 days and etoposide 150 mg/m² for 3 days. Following this induction, patients received five cycles of consolidation with cytarabine 3 g/m² daily for 4 days with mitoxantrone 20 mg/m² for 1 day on cycles 2 and 4, and etoposide 150 mg/m² for 2 days with cytarabine on courses 1,3 and 5. The patients in this study achieved a complete remission (CR) rate of 80% and a 3-year projected probability of survival of 40%. In a second AML study, 54 adults over the age of 60 with untreated AML were randomized to receive either high-dose or standard-dose mitoxantrone with cytarabine as a single induction regimen without consolidation. Patients receiving high-dose mitoxantrone did not experience increased morbidity or mortality compared with those given lower doses. Comparison of CR rates, disease-free and overall survival consistently favoured high-dose mitoxantrone, although the results did not achieve statistical significance. In patients with acute lymphocytic leukaemia (ALL), high-dose mitoxantrone with cytarabine was given as initial therapy in a phase II study involving 37 previously untreated adults. Results demonstrated that this dose-intensive regimen could produce a high CR rate (84%) with acceptable toxicity and compared favourably with experiences with vincristine/prednisone-based induction regimens. These studies demonstrate that high-dose mitoxantrone can be safely and effectively administered to patients with acute leukaemia and suggest that the incorporation of high doses of mitoxantrone into treatment regimens may lead to enhanced antileukaemic efficacy compared with standard doses. Phase III evaluations are planned.     

High-dose, continuous-infusion cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, vincristine, and prednisone for remission induction in refractory adult acute leukemia

Fifteen consecutive patients with refractory adult acute leukemia (RAAL) were treated with a combination of high-dose, continuous-infusion cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, vincristine, and prednisone (Hi-COAP). The initial nine patients received cyclophosphamide 350 mg/m2 as a 24-hour intravenous (IV) infusion over 5 days; cytarabine, 100 mg/m2 IV bolus every 12 hours for ten doses; vincristine, 2.0 mg IV bolus on day 1; and prednisone, 100 mg orally for 7 days. The last six patients had the cyclophosphamide infusion lengthened to 7 days, and the cytarabine increased to 14 doses. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Seven patients (47%) obtained a complete remission and six patients (40%) a partial remission. Median duration of all remissions has been 7.0 months with a range of 1 to 32 months. Toxicity has been limited to primarily myelosuppression with no hemorrhagic cystitis, central nervous system (CNS), hepatic, or pulmonary toxicity noted. Gastrointestinal toxicity was mild, with no effect on nutritional status noted. Median duration of complete responders was 8.5 months. Thus, Hi-COAP demonstrates promising efficacy with minimal toxicity in RAAL and warrants further exploration in multiinstitutional trials.     

Risk factors for high-dose cytarabine neurotoxicity: an analysis of a cancer and leukemia group B trial in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

PURPOSE: We analyzed pretreatment characteristics of patients with postremission acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) during a recent Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial to determine risk factors associated with HIDAC neurotoxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-six patients received at least one course of HIDAC as part of a CALGB protocol designed to determine the optimal dose of cytarabine (ara-C) for postremission treatment of AML. HIDAC consisted of 3 g/m2 ara-C infused over 3 hours at 12-hour intervals on days 1, 3, and 5. The pretreatment characteristics of 170 patients were available for risk analyses. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (10%) experienced neurotoxicity. Univariate analyses demonstrated associations between the occurrence of neurotoxicity and elevated serum creatinine, age, and alkaline phosphatase (AP). Multivariate analysis showed that these variables were independent risk factors. These findings were used to construct a risk model with the following parameters: creatinine greater than or equal to 1.2 mg/dL, age greater than or equal to 40 years, and AP greater than or equal to 3 x normal. Seventeen of 46 (37%) patients with two or more of these criteria developed neurotoxicity compared with one of 124 (1%) patients with one or none. The sensitivity and specificity of this model were 94% and 81%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that patients with two or more of the following parameters may be at increased risk for HIDAC neurotoxicity: (creatinine greater than or equal to 1.2 mg/dL, age greater than or equal to 40, and AP greater than or equal to 3 x normal). However, this model should be confirmed by analysis of additional groups of patients treated with HIDAC.     

Treatment of acute leukemia with idarubicin,etoposide and cytarabine (IDEA). A randomized study of etoposide schedule

Background The differences in toxicity of etoposide following continuous or bolus infusion are unknown.Methods We studied the schedule-dependent toxicity of high-dose etoposide when combined with high-dose cytarabine and idarubicin (IDEA) in 138 patients with acute leukemia. Four groups of patients were studied: group I, relapse; group II, secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML); group III, de novo AML, age >60 years; and group IV, induction failure or blast crisis of myeloproliferative syndrome. Treatment for groups I–III was idarubicin 8 mg/m² per day days 1–3, cytarabine 2000 mg/m² once a day days 1–6, and etoposide 1600 mg/m² total dose. Group IV treatment differed by cytarabine given twice daily days 1–6. Patients were randomized to etoposide as a continuous infusion days 1–6 or as a bolus infusion over 10 h on day 7.Results Continuous infusion etoposide produced significantly more oral mucositis than bolus etoposide. In groups I–III, comparing continuous and bolus etoposide, there was a median of 3 vs 0 days of grade 2 or more oral mucositis (P<0.0001) and 13.5 vs 0 days of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (P=0.0003). Group IV patients had a median 7 vs 0 days of grade 2 or more oral mucositis (P<0.01) and 21 vs 7 days of TPN (P<0.003), respectively. There were no differences in hematologic recovery, length of hospital stay, complete remission rate or overall survival between the two etoposide schedules. Of groups I–III patients, 51% achieved complete remission, and 11% died from treatment-related complications.Conclusion The toxicity profile of high-dose etoposide is schedule-dependent with prolonged exposure producing significantly more non-hematologic toxicity.This work was supported in part by research funds from Adria Laboratories and Kabi Pharmacia Inc.     

The impact of karyotype on remission rates in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia receiving high-dose cytarabine-based induction chemotherapy.

One hundred and twenty-eight patients aged 15 years or over (median 34) with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received 2- or 3-drug induction chemotherapy comprising 5 days of daily high-dose cytarabine (2 g/m2 q12h) and etoposide (100 mg/m2), without (n=62, 1985-90, protocol BF11) or with (n=66, 1990-97, protocol BF12) daily 5 mg/m2 anthracycline (61 idarubicin, 5 mitoxantrone). Twelve patients with t(15;17) were not included. Evaluable karyotypes were obtained in 110 (86%): 30 (27%) favorable, 60 (55%) intermediate, and 20 (18%) adverse. Three patients dying during chemotherapy were inevaluable. Eighty-four (67%) patients remitted with one cycle, and the overall complete remission (CR) rate was 72%. CR rates were comparable for patients with and without evaluable karyotypes. CR rates with BF11 (64% after one cycle; 72% overall) and BF12 (70% after one cycle; 72% overall) were comparable (P=.4 and 1.0 respectively). CR rates after one cycle (86%, 61% and 55%; P=.03) as well as overall CR rates (90%, 69% and 55%; P=.02) were significantly different for patients with favorable, intermediate and adverse karyotypes respectively. In Cox analysis, the karyotype was the only factor found to influence CR independently. We conclude that the karyotype of the leukemic clone is the most important determinant of response to high-dose cytarabine-based induction chemotherapy in AML. The addition of idarubicin to high-dose cytarabine and etoposide does not appear to improve CR rates. A different treatment strategy may be needed to improve CR rates for patients with non-favorable karyotypes.     

High-dose cytosine arabinoside and etoposide in the treatment of relapsed or refractory adult leukemia

Thirteen patients with leukemia were treated with a combination of cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) (3 g/m2 by 1-h infusion every 12 h for 12 doses) and etoposide (100 mg/m2 daily over 1 h for 3 doses). Toxicity of the regimen consisted of severe hematologic suppression, moderate abdominal colic with vomiting and diarrhea, and occasionally severe central nervous system (CNS) toxicity. Two patients received the regimen as consolidation for acute myelogenous leukemia in remission. Of the remaining 11 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)-blast crises or relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), nine patients (82%) obtained CR (or chronic phase) and two patients obtained partial remission (PR). High-dose ara-C and etoposide is an effective but toxic regiment for the treatment of relapsed or refractory myeloid leukemias.     

Mito-flag as salvage therapy for relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to examine the feasibility and toxicity of the combination of mitoxantrone, fludarabine, cytarabine as bolus (B) or continuous infusion (CI) and granulocyte- colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with recurrent and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 29 patients with relapsed (n =17) or refractory (n =12) AML were treated with the Mito-FLAG protocol consisting of mitoxantrone (7 mg/m(2), days 1/3/5), fludarabine (15mg/m(2), every 12 h, days 1-5), cytarabine (Ara-C) as bolus infusion (1000 mg/m(2) over 1 h, every 12 h, days 1-5) (n =15) or as continuous infusion (100-150 mg/m(2) over 24 h, days 1-5) (n =14), and G-CSF (5 mgr;g/ kg/day, day 0 until a neutrophile count of 0.5 x10(9)/l). RESULTS: 17 patients (59%) and 1 patient (3%) achieved complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR), respectively; thus the overall response rate was 62%. Following Mito-FLAG, 5 patients with CR underwent high-dose therapy (HDT) with allogeneic (n = 2) or autologous (n = 3) stem cell transplantation (SCT).With a median follow-up of 28 (range 6-54) months, 4 transplanted patients are alive in CR (n = 2) or in relapse (n = 2). The median duration of event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) was 3.2 and 6.8 months, and probabilities of EFS and OS after 1 year were 14 and 34%, respectively. The 1-year rates for EFS and OS in this group were 18 and 53%, respectively. Median duration of WHO grade 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia was 20 and 23 days, respectively. Nonhematological side effects were moderate, predominantly reaching WHO grades 1-2. Neutropenic fever was seen in 85% of courses, with a median duration of 4 (1-38) days. Four patients (14%) suffered an early death because of aplasia (n = 2), pneumonia (n =1) or progressive AML (1 nonresponding patient). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the Mito-FLAG protocol is feasible and can be safely performed with both schedules of Ara-C. In this study the regimens have shown high efficacy and acceptable toxicity in patients with relapsed or refractory AML. We currently examine the importance of bolus versus continuous infusion of Ara-C as part of the Mito-FLAG regimen in a prospective randomized multicenter trial.     

Chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia in the elderly with cytarabine, mitoxantrone, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor

Remission induction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia typically combines cytarabine with an anthracycline or anthracycline derivative. To date, no specific combination has emerged as more efficacious than any other. To reduce toxicity and shorten the duration of neutropenia, hematopoietic growth factors are often added to the chemotherapy regimen, especially in elderly patients. In all prospective, randomized, growth factor trials to date, daunorubicin has been the drug selected for combination with cytarabine. We hypothesized that mitoxantrone might be as efficacious in this patient population with perhaps less toxicity when combined with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Patients older than age 55 years with a diagnosis of either de novo or secondary, untreated acute myelogenous leukemia were eligible for this clinical trial. Eligible patients were treated with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 infused as a continuous infusion daily for 7 days and mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 bolus intravenously for the first 3 days of cytarabine. A second cycle of chemotherapy was administered on the fourteenth day of treatment if marrow aplasia was not achieved with the first cycle. Once aplasia was achieved, GM-CSF 250 microg/m2 was given subcutaneously daily until neutrophil recovery. Those patients who achieved complete remission were treated with two cycles of intermediate-dose cytarabine (400 mg/m2 daily for 5 days) and with GM-CSF as consolidation therapy. Of the 30 patients treated, the median age was 69 years (range: 55-76 years) and 18 patients were older than 65 years of age. Seven (23%) patients had secondary acute leukemia and 12 (40%) had poor-risk cytogenetics. Nineteen (63%) achieved a complete remission. Eleven patients were either refractory to treatment or died during their treatment. The toxicity encountered was no more than that reported in similar studies using daunorubicin in combination with cytarabine. Long-term survival was poor, with a median disease-free survival of only 8.1 months in patients who achieved complete remission. In this elderly population of patients with high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia, this combination of cytarabine, mitoxantrone, and GM-CSF resulted in an adequate remission rate with acceptable toxicity. Long-term survival, however, was poor and innovative treatment approaches to maintain remission are needed.     

Dose-escalation study of single dose mitoxantrone in combination with timed sequential chemotherapy in patients with refractory or relapsing acute myelogenous leukemia

A dose-escalation study was realized in order to assess the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of high-dose mitoxantrone in a single injection combined with cytarabine and etoposide (EMA regimen) in refractory or relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Between July 1997 and June 1998, 24 patients with relapsed or refractory AML entered the study. All but one patient had normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at baseline. Performance status according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria was less than two in all cases. All patients have been previously treated by mitoxantrone or anthracyclines. Four cohort of ten patients were scheduled with the following doses: (1) mitoxantrone 36 mg/m2 on day 1; (2) mitoxantrone 45 mg/m2 on day 1; (3) mitoxantrone 60 mg/m2 on day 1; (4) mitoxantrone 75 mg/m2 on day 1 in combination with cytarabine 500 mg/m2 per day (days 1-3, and days 8-10), and etoposide 200 mg/m2 per day (days 8-10). All patients received the full doses of the three drugs. The limiting toxicity was defined as WHO grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity and for impairment of cardiac function by Alexander's criteria (moderate or severe toxicity). The occurrence of limiting toxicity in at least three patients from the same dose level determined the MDT. No limiting toxicity was observed in mitoxantrone dose level 1. Two limiting toxicities were observed in mitoxantrone dose level 2 (one mucositis, one moderate cardiac toxicity), and three limiting toxicities in mitoxantrone dose level 3 (1 high transaminase levels, two moderate cardiac toxicities) ending the assay. Overall, 16 patients (67%) achieved complete remission (CR). One drug-addict patient died from cerebral hemorrhage due to severe aspergillosis and was not considered as a limiting toxicity. After EMA chemotherapy, 13 patients received subsequent chemotherapy courses involving anthracyclines or their derivatives. Six patients underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. No late toxicity occurred. The median survival of the entire cohort was 41.4 weeks. We conclude that (i) EMA chemotherapy using a single injection of mitoxantrone is effective in the treatment of refractory or relapsing AML; (ii) the recommended phase II dose of mitoxantrone is 45 mg/m2 administered over 30 min as a single dose in combination with cytarabine and etoposide.     

Combination regimen of cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine), cytarabine and G-CSF (CLAG) as induction therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

The aim of the study was efficacy and toxicity evaluation of combination of 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA) with cytarabine (Ara-C) and G-CSF (CLAG regimen) as reinduction therapy in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The protocol stipulated an infusion of 5 mg/m2 of 2-CdA over 2 hours daily for 5 consecutive days. A 4-hour infusion of Ara-C (2 g/m2) was started 2 hours after each infusion of 2-CdA. G-CSF at a dose 300 microg s.c was given 24 hours before the first dose of 2-CdA for 6 days. In case of WBC>20x10(9)/l G-CSF was started simultaneously with 2-CdA. In the case of complete response (CR) consolidation treatment with 2-CdA containing regimens was started. In case of partial response a second identical course of CLAG was given. Response criteria were established according to those developed by the NCI Sponsored Workshop. Among 20 patients accrued all but 2 received at least one course of CLAG induction therapy in the planned doses. 10/20 (50%) (95% CI 27-73%) patients achieved a CR with a median duration of 22.5 weeks (range 3.5-53 weeks). Two (10%) patients had a PR and 8 were non-responders. One patient underwent peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Overall 4 patients are in continuous CR with a median duration of 16.2 weeks (range 3.5-36.5). Among non-responders two patients did not receive the full dose of treatment because of complications during the cycle, both of them died; 3 died early after complete induction therapy before recovery of the bone marrow and 3 were resistant to CLAG. All 20 patients but one experienced granulocytopenia <0.2x10(9)/l and thrombocytopenia <20x10(9)/l. Median time to reach PMN>0.5x10(9) G/l was 18.7 days and platelets>50x10(9)/l was 27.2 days. In conclusion, the CLAG regimen had significant antileukemic activity and acceptable toxicity as reinduction treatment in refractory or relapsed AML patients.     

Mitoxantrone and cytarabine induction, high-dose cytarabine, and etoposide intensification for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: Children's Cancer Group Study 2951.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the response rate, survival, and toxicity of mitoxantrone and cytarabine induction, high-dose cytarabine and etoposide intensification, and further consolidation/maintenance therapies, including bone marrow transplantation, in children with relapsed, refractory, or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To evaluate response to 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CDA) and etoposide (VP-16) in patients who did not respond to mitoxantrone and cytarabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with relapsed/refractory AML (n = 101) and secondary AML (n = 13) were entered. RESULTS: Mitoxantrone and cytarabine induction achieved a remission rate of 76% for relapsed/refractory patients and 77% for patients with secondary AML, with a 3% induction mortality rate. Cytarabine and etoposide intensification exceeded the acceptable toxic death rate of 10%. The response rate of 2-CDA/VP-16 was 8%. Two-year overall survival was estimated at 24% and was better than historical control data. Patients with secondary AML had similar outcomes to relapsed or refractory patients. Initial remission longer than 1 year was the most important prognostic factor for patients with primary AML (2-year survival rate, 75%), whereas for patients with primary AML, with less than 12 months of initial remission, survival was 13% and was similar to that of refractory patients (6%). CONCLUSION: Mitoxantrone and cytarabine induction is effective with reasonable toxicity in patients with relapsed/refractory or secondary AML. The cytarabine and etoposide intensification regimen should be abandoned because of toxicity. Patients with relapsed AML with initial remissions longer than 1 year have a relatively good prognosis.     

Chemotherapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission

Although the majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) achieve a complete remission with induction chemotherapy, most will ultimately relapse. Therefore, the optimal postremission therapy for AML remains to be defined, and further improvements in treatment strategies are required. Clinical trials have demonstrated that early intensive consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine can produce prolonged responses in up to 40% of patients in remission after standard induction therapy. Equally, however, it has been shown that high-dose cytarabine used in induction therapy can deliver equivalent long-term results. Autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission are also valid alternatives, but the value of low-dose maintenance treatment seems confined to acute promyelocytic leukemia. Further improvement in the treatment of AML is likely to depend on the development of new strategies, such as molecularly targeted or immune therapies.     

Homoharringtonine in combination with cytarabine and aclarubicin resulted in high complete remission rate after the first induction therapy in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia.

To assess the efficacy and toxicity of HAA regimen (homoharritonine 4 mg/m2/day, days 1-3; cytarabine 150 mg/m2/day, days 1-7; aclarubicin 12 mg/m2/day, days 1-7) as an induction therapy in the treatment of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 48 patients with newly diagnosed AML, aged 35 (14-57) years, were entered into this clinical study. The median follow-up was 26 months. Eighty-three percent of patients achieved complete remission (CR), and the first single course of induction HAA regimen resulted in CR rate of 79%. The CR rate of 100, 82 and 33% were achieved in patients with favorable, intermediate and unfavorable cytogenetics, respectively. For all patients who achieved CR, the median time from the initiation of the induction therapy to the evaluation of the remission status was 32 days. For all patients, the estimated 3 years overall survival (OS) rate was 53%, whereas for patients with M5, the estimated OS rate at 3 years was 75%. The toxicities associated with HAA regimen were acceptable, and the most common toxicity was infection. This study suggested that HAA regimen might be a well-tolerable, effective induction regimen in young adult patients with AML.     

Continuous-infusion daunorubicin and carboplatin for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly.

Since continuous infusion of daunorubicin and of carboplatin have shown efficacy and reduced toxicity in early phase studies in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 34 elderly patients with high-risk AML were treated with continuous infusion daunorubicin, 30 mg/m2 per day, from day 1 to day 4, and carboplatin, 200 mg/m2 per day from day 3 to day 7. Seven patients had therapy-related AML and/or AML following a myelodysplastic syndrome at diagnosis, 15 were in first and two in second relapse, and 10 were resistant to previous anthracycline and cytarabine therapy. Nine patients or 26%, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 18-67%, achieved complete remission, including one patient at diagnosis (14%, CI: 0-58%), seven with relapsed AML (41%, CI: 18-67%), and one with resistant AML (10%, CI: 0-45%). Median durations of neutropenia below 0.5 x 10(9)/l and of thrombocytopenia below 20 x 10(9)/l were 24 and 20 days respectively. Severe toxicity included infections in 20 patients (59%), bleeding in two (6%), cardiac anomalies in two (6%), and vomiting in one (3%). Overall four patients (12%) died from chemotherapy related toxicity and 21 (62%) had resistant disease. Median overall survival was 4 months and median disease-free survival 8 months. We conclude that this regimen had efficacy with reduced toxicity in relapsed patients. Higher dosages for the same drugs could be tolerated by better risk patients for precise evaluation of cross reactivity with cytarabine-based regimens.     

Effect of low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor priming (CAG regimen) on the outcome of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of low-dose cytarabine and aclarubicin in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) protocol in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A total of 50 elderly patients including 8 aged over 70 years were enrolled. All patients were treated with CAG regimen including low-dose cytarabine (10mg/m(2) every 12h, days 1-14), aclarubicin (10mg every day, days 1-8), and G-CSF (200 microg/m(2) every day, days 1-14) priming. The overall response rate was 72.0%, and 29 of 50 (58.0%) patients achieved complete remission, including 23 of 35 (65.8%) with previously untreated AML, 6 of 15 (40.0%) with refractory, relapsed or secondary AML, 4 of 8 (50.0%) aged over 70 years, 4 of 10 (40.0%) with unfavorable cytogenetic aberrations. The early death rate was 7.6%. The median overall survival was 14 months. Myelosuppression was mild to moderate, severe nonhematologic toxicity was not observed. Thus CAG priming regimen as the induction therapy is well tolerated and effective in elderly patients with AML.